NZ212988A - Vertical shaft rock crusher with split tub for easy maintenance of anvils - Google Patents

Description

212988 Priority Date(s): Complete Specification Filed: class: to J. ■ jtaaasteo.. " 5Vi'jULl'9£l6r Publication Date: P.O. Journal, No: ..,.s®s. rti] 20NWBB51 Patents Form No. 5 NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION "VERTICAL SHAFT IMPACT CRUSHER WITH SPLIT TUB" E,WE CEDARAPIDS, INC. of 916-16th Street, N.E. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402, U.S.A. a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, U.S.A., hereby declare the invention, for which /S-/we pray that a patent may be granted to upS/us , and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement (followed by page 1A) The present invention concerns rock crushers and particularly impact crushers of the vertical shaft type.

As is well known, the anvils in a vertical shaft impact crusher wear at a rate second only to the impeller 5 shoes and so must also be replaced at periodic intervals. Typically the anvils are carried by an anvil ring seated within the upper end of the crusher housing or "tub", as it is often called. But fine and coarse rock, angular and sharp edged from fracturing, accumulates on top and behind the 10 anvils and the anvil ring. So densely packed does the accumulation become that removal of the anvils and the anvil ring is both difficult and time consuming. After removing the crusher lid it often needs two men with hammers and bars up to one hour to chip away the accumulation before the ring and anvils 15 can be detached. Even a single rock can bar removal of the anvil ring. 212988 Not only must the anvils be replaced when worn out but for economy's sake they must also be rotated. As is likewise well known, the anvils wear unevenly, those in one sector abrading the most while those in a sector diametrically 5 opposite abrading the least, the wear on the remaining anvils graduating between the two extremes. It is not uncommon to have a 30% to 50% difference between the most and least worn anvils. The reason for this, as will be explained more fully later on, has to do with the nature of the feed tube carried 10 by the crusher lid, as well as with the direction of the feed into the hopper from the conveyor. Usually the crusher operator first replaces the most worn anvils, after having excavated the accumulation of rock above them as previously described. Some anvils will have remaining wear life but 15 often the operator will also replace those anyway rather than endure the down time involved in replacing them a few days later. There is then not only a mismatch, unworn and worn anvils in the crusher, but it is most difficult afterwards, until a complete set of new anvils is installed, to arrange 20 anvil replacement in order that all anvils are equally worn before they are discarded. This is because the next anvils needing replacement are among those of graduated wear between the most and least worn, again causing a mismatch. When the least worn at last must be discarded there is approximately 25 30% to 50% wear on those which first replaced the most worn anvils. At this time it is common to exchange the least worn anvils for the most worn ones either by moving them individually or by rotating the anvil ring 180°. But however rotation of the anvils is performed in current practice, v NOV 1985 manual labor is required to knock out the accumulated rock above. Even then it is often still difficult or impossible as a practical matter either to rotate the anvil ring in place or to remove it for rotation because of liming, corrosion and the 5 like between the anvil ring and the tub in which the ring is seated. Hence, in most cases the anvils must be individually removed from the anvil ring and replaced 180° from their previous location.

Accordingly, the primary object of the invention is 10 the provision of a vertical impact crusher ih which the anvils can be replaced and/or the anvil ring and anvils as a unit easily rotated to even out anvil wear, all with a minimum of time and labor.

The aim of the invention is achieved by, in effect, 15 splitting the tub behind the anvil ring (where no rock accumulates) into upper and lower portions or tubs and securing the anvil ring or other anvil retaining means to the upper tub only. Hence, after removal of the lid and hopper, the upper tub complete with the anvil ring and anvils can be lifted off 20 (by a crane) as a unit from the lower tub and inverted on the ground. When this is done, it has been found in practice, the mere inversion of the upper tub and the attendant jars as it strikes the ground very effectively dislodges all the accumulated rock. Especially when the anvils are of the liftout 25 type, being retained by gravity in wedging seats, inversion of the upper tub allows the individual anvils to be easily removed. At most, only a blow or two by a hammer is necessary.

Another feature inherent in the split tub design is ou the ability to rotate all the anvils as a unit so as to even 212988 *• - ;If l^20 NOV 1985 ;out anvil wear without the need to remove individual anvils or to lift out the anvil ring from within the tub in order to do so. After, say, 30% to 50% wear of the anvils in the heavy wear sector, the lid and hopper are removed and then the upper 5 tub and anvils as a unit rotated 180°, thus placing the least worn anvils in the heavy wear sector and the most worn anvils in the least wear sector, the two sets of anvils between those two sectors thus being reversed in graduation of wear. Thereafter operation of the crusher will largely even out anvil 10 wear until all the anvils are nearly equally worn to the prescribed limit. All the anvils are then ready for replacement in the manner previously described by lifting off the upper tub and inverting it on the ground. Obviously, the saving in time and labor and in anvil utility and economy is substantial 15 compared with current practices. ;The features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the drawings and the more detailed description which follows and the drawings, in which: ;Figure 1 is a vertical section, taken approximately 20 along the line 1-1 of Figure 2, through the upper half of a vertical shaft impact crusher embodying the features of the invention. ;Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along the line 2-2 of Figure 1 and also illustrating the disposition of the 25 gradations of anvil wear relative to the direction of material feed into the crusher. ;Figure 3, which appears with Figure 1, is a detail view taken along the line 3-3 of Figure 1. ;The construction of the crusher is basically quite conventional, the essential difference being the cylindrical housing which is split into a lower tub 10 and an upper tub 11. The upper edge of the lower tub 10 is surmounted by a 5 gasket 12 upon which seats an annular flange plate 13 forming the base of the upper tub 11. The inner annular edge of the plate 13 is encircled by an upstanding annular anvil ring support 14 which is braced against the inner wall o£ the upper tub 11 by short radial gusset plates 14a. The lower and upper 10 tubs 10 and 11 are secured together by an array of equally spaced or indexed upstanding wedge tangs 15 welded to the exterior of the lower tub 10 adjacent its top edge, the tangs 15 extending up through slots in the flange plate 13 and apertured thereabove to receive elongated wedges 16. Similar 15 upstanding wedge tangs 17 are secured adjacent the top edge of the upper tub 11 and extend up through open ended slots in the rim of a circular lid 18, the tangs 17 also being apertured thereabove to receive elongated wedges 19. The latter and wedges 16 thus secure the lower and upper tubs 10 and 11 and 20 the lid 18 together during operation of the crusher. ;The lid 18 is centrally apertured to receive a conventional cylindrical feed tube 20 surrounded by a feed hopper 21, both secured to the lid 18. The feed tube 20 extends down below the lid 18 and opens on to a typical circular impeller 25 table 22 fitted with replaceable impeller shoes 23 outboard of the feed tube 20. The impeller table 22 is secured atop a fly wheel 24 driven by a vertical main shaft 25 in any suitable , ; nmanner. The anvil ring support 14 embraces an anvil ring 26 ^which is supported therewithin by a trio of short lugs 27 '20N0VB85J ;6 ;212988 ;welded atop the ring 26 and extending radially outwards therefrom. The lugs 27 sit in corresponding ones of several steps 28 cut into the top of the ring support 14 (see Figure 3) and are retained by complementary stepped blocks 29 bolted at 30 5 to the adja'cent inner wall of the upper tub 11. The inner face of the anvil ring 26 carries a circle of anvils 31 retained by gravity in wedging sockets 32 welded to the anvil ring 26, all as is typical. Note that the anvil ring 26 is disposed such that the joint between the tubs 10 and 11 is 10 behind the ring 26. This protects the gasket 12 from abrasion by dust swirling below in the tub 10. Vertical adjustment of the anvils 31 is accomplished by removing the blocks 29 and then lifting and rotating the anvil ring 26 until the lugs 27 sit upon the steps 28 of the desired elevation, whereafter the 15 blocks 29 are reinstalled. ;Accordingly, when the anvils 31 are to be changed the lid wedges 19 are removed and the lid 18 lifted off. Then the tub wedges 16 are removed and the entire upper tub 11 together with the anvils 31 is lifted off and inverted on the 20 ground. The accumulated rock above the anvil ring 26, indicated at 33 in Figure 1, is thereby sufficiently jostled so that it largely falls free to the ground. If the anvils 31 do not then also fall free of their own accord from their wedging sockets 32, no more than a blow or two from a hammer will 25 dislodge them. When the upper tub 11 is righted, fresh anvils 31 can be dropped into their sockets 32 and the upper tub 11 and lid 18 reassembled on the crusher. ;The phenomenon of unequal wear of the anvils 31 is indicated in Figure 2. Assuming that feed into the hopper 21, ;12988 ;.<£V ;as from a conveyor, is in the direction of the arrow F, the descending rock in the feed tube 20 will form a sort of vortex V eccentric to the crusher's axis, much like water down a drain, with the center line of the greatest and least quan-5 tities of material lying in the direction of feed F, the greatest quantity being disposed away from and the least toward the incoming material. Assuming also that the direction of rotation of the impeller table 22 is as shown by the arrow R, of the material flung outwards by the impeller 10 shoes 23 the greatest quantity will therefore strike the anvils 31 in the 9:30 to 11:30 o'clock position, and the least amount the anvils 31 in the 3:30 to 5:30 o'clock position, relative to the orientation of Figure 2, as indicated by the two groups of stippled anvils 31 in that Figure. Hence the 15 wear on the former anvils will be greatest and that on the latter least. Put another way, the center line of the area of greatest anvil wear forms an obtuse included angle, and the center line of least anvil wear an acute included angle, with and on opposite sides of the direction of feed F. Anvil wear 20 between these two diametrically opposite locations graduates from the greatest to the least. ;The difference in anvil wear between the greatest and the least can be substantial. For instance, after 133 hours of operation of an actual crusher embodying the inven-25 tion, 2-5/16 inches were worn from the anvils in the area of greatest wear but only 1-1/4 to 1-5/16 inches from those in the area of least wear. At that time, the wedges 16 were removed and the upper tub 11 and lid 18 lifted and rotated 180°, thus reversing the relative positions of the anvils. ;20 NOV 1985' ;lceOL ;8 ;212988 ;* After reassembly and an additional 218 hours of operation, the wear on all the anvils was nearly equal, varying from 3-9/16 to 3-5/16 inches. Hence by simply rotating the upper tub 11 from time to time, without need to disturb the anvil ring or to remove the anvils individually, anvil wear can be kept relatively equal until all are worn' to the limit. All anvils can then be replaced at once, in the manner previously described, rather than only piecemeal and with the difficulties inherent in the prior art. The consequent savings in down time and anvil cost are obvious. Note that the upper tub 11 need not be rotated 180° each time but, owing to the equal spacing of the wedge tangs 15, lesser degrees of rotation are available in order, for instance, to accommodate a change in the direction of feed F and thus a change in the areas of greatest and least anvil wear.

Claims (8)

WHAT Jf'A'E CLAIM ISt-

1. A crusher of the kind described including a stationary housing having an upright cylindrical wall, a removable lid closing the upper end of the housing, and a plurality of stationary anvils within the housing circum- 5 ferentially disposed in a ring within and around the housing wall, the anvils being retained in position by anvil retaining means carried by the housing wall, characterized by: the housing comprising upper and lower portions, the anvil retaining means being secured to the upper housing portion, 10 the upper housing portion being attached to the lower housing portion by releasable means effective so that upon release of the releasable means the upper housing portion together with the anvils can be moved as a unit from an initial position on the lower housing portion to at least one other position 15 thereon rotatably disposed with respect to the housing axis from said initial position.

2. The crusher of claim 1 further characterized in that after release of the releasable means the upper housing portion and the anvils can be moved as a unit to any one of a plurality of uniformly indexed other positions on the lower 5 housing portion rotatably disposed with respect to the housing axis from said initial position.

3. The crusher of claim 1 or 2 further characterized in that the anvil retaining means together with the anvils can be vertically adjusted as a unit along the housing axis relative to and within the upper housing portion. 212988

4. The crusher of claim 3 further characterized in that said adjustment includes removing the lid, lifting the anvil retaining means together with the anvils as a unit from a first vertical position, rotating the same relative to the upper housing portion, and lowering the same to a second vertical position.

5. The crusher of claim 4 further characterized by releasable means retaining the anvil retaining means and the anvils in said vertical positions.

6. The crusher of claim 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 further characterized in that upon release of the releasable means and removal of the lid the upper housing portion together with the anvils can also be lifted as a unit from the lower housing portion and inverted on the ground to facilitate removal of the anvils from the anvil retaining means.

7. The crusher of claim 6 further characterized in that the anvils are retained in the anvil retaining means at least in part by gravity, whereby upon inversion of the upper housing portion and the anvils on the ground after lifting of same as aforesaid the anvils may be individually removed from the anvil retaining means.

8. The crusher of claim 6 further characterized in that said movement as a unit of the upper housing portion together with the anvils from said initial position to said other position or positions is accomplished by lifting the same from the lower housing portion, rotating the same about its axis, and replacing the same back onto the lower housing portion. BALDWIN, SON & CAREY ATTORNEYS FOR THE APPLICANTS