NL2033205B1 - Optimization method for subsoiling shovel - Google Patents
Optimization method for subsoiling shovel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NL2033205B1 NL2033205B1 NL2033205A NL2033205A NL2033205B1 NL 2033205 B1 NL2033205 B1 NL 2033205B1 NL 2033205 A NL2033205 A NL 2033205A NL 2033205 A NL2033205 A NL 2033205A NL 2033205 B1 NL2033205 B1 NL 2033205B1
- Authority
- NL
- Netherlands
- Prior art keywords
- curved
- shovel
- analysis
- optimization
- subsoiling
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01B—SOIL WORKING IN AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY; PARTS, DETAILS, OR ACCESSORIES OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINES OR IMPLEMENTS, IN GENERAL
- A01B13/00—Ploughs or like machines for special purposes ; Ditch diggers, trench ploughs, forestry ploughs, ploughs for land or marsh reclamation
- A01B13/08—Ploughs or like machines for special purposes ; Ditch diggers, trench ploughs, forestry ploughs, ploughs for land or marsh reclamation for working subsoil
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01B—SOIL WORKING IN AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY; PARTS, DETAILS, OR ACCESSORIES OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINES OR IMPLEMENTS, IN GENERAL
- A01B13/00—Ploughs or like machines for special purposes ; Ditch diggers, trench ploughs, forestry ploughs, ploughs for land or marsh reclamation
- A01B13/08—Ploughs or like machines for special purposes ; Ditch diggers, trench ploughs, forestry ploughs, ploughs for land or marsh reclamation for working subsoil
- A01B13/10—Special implements for lifting subsoil layers
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Foundations (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides an optimization method for a subsoiling shovel, including performing force analysis on a curved subsoiling shovel to obtain 5 a two-dimensional structural diagram, carrying out two-dimensional diagram drawing and three-dimensional modeling of the curved subsoiling shovel successively according to measured working parameters and actual dimensions of a subsoiler to obtain a three-dimensional model, importing the three-dimensional model to finite element analysis software for analysis to obtain an analysis result, 10 and obtaining set load condition, constraints and performance indicators and performing topology optimization on material distribution of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the analysis result to obtain an optimization result. In the present invention, topology optimization is carried out so that the resistance to a subsoiler in the process of advancing becomes smaller. Thus, the energy efficiency of tillage 15 is improved.
Description
OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR SUBSOILING SHOVEL
The present invention relates to the technical field of design and manufacture of agricultural machinery, and in particular, to an optimization method for a subsoiling shovel.
Subsoiling is a tillage method for effectively breaking a plow pan. A key working part for subsoiling operation, namely a subsoiling shovel, may be impeded by great resistance with high energy consumption in the working process of breaking the plow pan. Besides, since it is difficult to accurately obtain tilling depth information in real time during subsoiling, the quality of the subsoiling operation cannot be guaranteed. These severely limit the promotion and application of the subsoiling operation. Traditional subsoiling implements may be faced with problems such as great subsoiling resistance, serious implement abrasion and high energy consumption during the subsoiling operation. Moreover, due to great subsoiling resistance, some large-sized traction apparatuses for farming machinery, for example, a large tractor, may press soil repeatedly, causing farmland soil to be further compacted, leading to the degradation of farmland quality.
An objective of the present invention provides an optimization method for a subsoiling shovel in order to overcome the drawbacks in the prior art.
To achieve the above objective, the present invention provides the following solution.
An optimization method for a subsoiling shovel includes: performing force analysis on a curved subsoiling shovel to obtain a two- dimensional structural diagram; carrying out two-dimensional diagram drawing and three-dimensional modeling of the curved subsoiling shovel successively according to measured working parameters and actual dimensions of a subsoiler to obtain a three-dimensional model; importing the three-dimensional model to finite element analysis software for analysis to obtain an analysis result; and obtaining set load condition, constraints and performance indicators and performing topology optimization on material distribution of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the analysis result to obtain an optimization result.
Preferably, importing the three-dimensional model to finite element analysis software for analysis to obtain an analysis result includes: performing meshing on the three-dimensional model to obtain a mesh model of the curved subsoiling shovel; obtaining a load and a boundary condition of the curved subsoiling shovel; and carrying out displacement fringe analysis and stress fringe analysis of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the mesh model, the load and the boundary condition to obtain the analysis result.
Preferably, the finite element analysis software is ANSYS software.
Preferably, software for the three-dimensional modeling is UG software.
Preferably, a format of the three-dimensional model is prt.
Preferably, after obtaining set load condition, constraints and performance indicators and performing topology optimization on material distribution of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the analysis result to obtain an optimization result, the optimization method further includes: determining structural features of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the optimization result; constructing an optimization function for the curved subsoiling shovel based on the structural features; determining constraints based on stress information, frequency information and boundary information of the curved subsoiling shovel; and optimizing the optimization function by particle swarm optimization based on the constraints to obtain the mass of the optimized curved subsoiling shovel.
According to specific embodiments provided in the present invention, the present invention has the following technical effects:
The present invention provides an optimization method for a subsoiling shovel, including performing force analysis on a curved subsoiling shovel to obtain a two- dimensional structural diagram, carrying out two-dimensional diagram drawing and three-dimensional modeling of the curved subsoiling shovel successively according to measured working parameters and actual dimensions of a subsoiler to obtain a three-dimensional model, importing the three-dimensional model to finite element analysis software for analysis to obtain an analysis result, and obtaining set load condition, constraints and performance indicators and performing topology optimization on material distribution of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the analysis result to obtain an optimization result. In the present invention, topology optimization is carried out so that the resistance to the subsoiler in the process of advancing becomes smaller. Thus, the energy efficiency of tillage is improved.
To describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or in the prior art more clearly, the accompanying drawings required in the embodiments will be briefly described below. Apparently, the accompanying drawings in the following description show merely some embodiments of the present invention, and other drawings can be derived from the accompanying drawings by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a two-dimensional structural diagram according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a diagram of force analysis according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a front view of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a side view of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of modeling of a subsoiler frame according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of modeling of a soil preparation roller of a subsoiler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8. is a side view of an assembly diagram of a curved subsoiler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 9is a front view of a curved subsoiler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of a three-dimensional model of a curved subsoiler according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a simplified model of a curved shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of meshing of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of the mesh quality of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram of a boundary condition of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 15 is a first diagram of displacement fringes of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 16 is a second diagram of displacement fringes of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 17 is a first diagram of stress fringes of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 18 is a second diagram of stress fringes of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 19 is a first schematic diagram of an optimization result of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 20 is a second schematic diagram of an optimization result of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 21 is a third schematic diagram of an optimization result of a curved subsoiling shovel according to an embodiment of the present invention.
An objective of the present invention is to provide an optimization method for a subsoiling shove. Topology optimization is carried out so that the resistance to a subsoiler in the process of advancing becomes smaller. Thus, the energy efficiency of tillage is improved.
To make the above-mentioned objective, features and advantages of the present invention clearer and more comprehensible, the present invention will be further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the present invention provides an optimization method for a subsoiling, including the following steps:
Step 100: force analysis is performed on a curved subsoiling shovel to obtain a two-dimensional structural diagram, where the two-dimensional structural diagram is as shown in FIG. 2. In this embodiment, force analysis is also performed on the curved subsoiling shovel to obtain a diagram of force analysis, as shown in FIG. 3.
Step 200: two-dimensional diagram drawing and three-dimensional modeling of the curved subsoiling shovel are carried out successively according to measured 5 working parameters and actual dimensions of a subsoiler to obtain a three- dimensional model, where a front view and a side view of the three-dimensional model are as shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5.
Step 300: the three-dimensional model is imported to finite element analysis software for analysis to obtain an analysis result.
Step 400: set load condition, constraints and performance indicators are obtained, and topology optimization is performed on material distribution of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the analysis result to obtain an optimization result.
Specifically, in this embodiment, a frame and a soil preparation roller of the subsoiler are modeled, respectively, as shown in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7. A roller and hollow blades of the soil preparation roller are suspended behind the subsoiling shovel to perform soil crushing operation.
Further, after each component of the subsoiler is modeled, all the components are assembled through virtual assembly to obtain an assembly diagram, thereby visually showing the three-dimensional structural diagram of the subsoiler. The assembly is also carried out in UG software. Virtual assembly is carried out according to the assembly relationships of the components. The side view and the front view of the assembly diagram are as shown in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9.
Preferably, step 300 includes: performing meshing on the three-dimensional model to obtain a mesh model of the curved subsoiling shovel; obtaining a load and a boundary condition of the curved subsoiling shovel; and carrying out displacement fringe analysis and stress fringe analysis of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the mesh model, the load and the boundary condition to obtain the analysis result.
Specifically, three-dimensional modeling is carried out by using UG in this embodiment. The resulting three-dimensional diagram is imported to ANSYS for finite element simulative analysis. Topology optimization is then carried out based on the analysis result to improve the configuration of the subsoiler so that the subsoiler performs better in subsoiling operation. Since the three-dimensional modeling is carried out in the UG software, the file may be missed or cannot be opened when imported to ANSYS. Therefore, each three-dimensional diagram made in UG is converted into the format of prt for operation.
Further, with the three-dimensional structural diagram of the key part subsoiling shovel of the subsoiler, the finite element analysis in this embodiment only requires importing of the three-dimensional structural diagram to the ANSYS finite element analysis software for calculation, as shown in FIG. 10 and FIG. 11. A shovel tip and a shovel column of the subsoiling shovel are both made of 65 Mn, and the physical properties thereof are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Physical Properties of Material of Subsoiling Shovel
Name Elasticity Poisson's Density Tensile Yield
Modulus Ratio (kg/m3) Strength Limit (GPa) (MPa) (MPa) 65Mn 210 0.288 7820 735 430
In this embodiment, the first step of the finite element analysis is to perform meshing on the three-dimensional model of the subsoiling shovel to generate elements. The meshing is performed using the ANSYS software, and the model after the meshing is as shown in FIG. 12. The mesh element quality is as shown in
FIG. 13. As can be seen from the figure, the element quality is mostly above 0.9 and all above 0.85, which meet the mesh quality requirements.
Still further, in this embodiment, the load is a force of 1800 N applied to the shovel tip and a shovel shaft of the subsoiling shovel in the working process of the subsoiling shovel. The boundary condition is that the shovel column of the subsoiling shovel is suspended and fixed behind the subsoiler which is restrained by the frame. The ANSYS software sets the boundary condition at screw hole A in
FIG. 14 to limit the degree of freedom of the shovel shaft.
Alternatively, displacement fringes in this embodiment are as shown in FIG. 15 and
FIG. 16. The maximum displacement of the subsoiling shovel is 43.997 mm, which is small and meets the requirement of this study. Stress fringes in the working process of the subsoiling shovel are as shown in FIG. 17 and FIG. 18. In an area of stress concentration surrounding a dismantling hole, the maximum stress on the subsoiling shovel in the working process is 212.56 MPa.
Each physical property of the material is compared with a simulation result, as shown in Table 2. From the comparison result, it can be seen that the maximum stress of the subsoiling shovel in the working process is 212.56 MPa and the safety factor is 2.02, which are accepted. This indicates that the strength of the subsoiling shovel in the working process meets the specified requirement and the structure design of the subsoiling shovel is reasonable. By calculating the stress and deformation of the subsoiling shovel in the working process, the maximum deformation of the curved subsoiling shovel is calculated to be 43.997 mm, while the maximum stress to be 212.56 Mpa and the safety factor to be 2.02 MPa. The strength and the stiffness meet the design requirements.
Table 2 Comparison Between Each Physical Property of Material and Simulation
Result
Name Material Maximum Yield Strength Safety Accepted
Stress (MPa) Factor or Not (MPa)
Subsoiling 65Mn shovel 212.56 430 2.02 Accepted
Optimization analysis is performed on the curved subsoiling shovel by topology optimization in this embodiment. Topology optimization is a mathematical method of optimizing material distribution in a given area based on the given load condition, constraints and performance indicators and is a kind of structure optimization. With the material distribution as the object of optimization, an optimal distribution scheme may be found in the design space with uniform material distribution by the topology optimization. Thus, the topology optimization has more degrees of design freedom than dimension optimization and shape optimization, can obtain bigger design space, and is one of the most promising aspect of structure optimization.
The optimization result of the curved subsoiling shovel is as shown in FIG. 19 to
FIG. 21. In this embodiment, it can be seen that the topology optimization can not only make the stress on the subsoiling shovel uniform but also achieve weight reduction, causing the gravity of the subsoiler in the advancing process to be reduced, as shown in Table 3. Thus, soil compaction can be alleviated, and the working efficiency can be improved. Besides, both material and power can be saved.
Table 3 Comparison between Weights of Curved Subsoiling Shovel Before and
After Optimization on Weight Reduction
Indicator Before Optimization After Optimization
Weight 25.427 kg 18 kg
An overall understanding of the internal force of the subsoiler is provided based on the finite element analysis and the topology analysis, and in combination with the external force to the subsoiler in the foregoing force analysis, a reference is provided for the overall force analysis of the subsoiler and for the study of forces on and the working stroke of the subsoiler. Meanwhile, in combination with the analysis of soil indicators, a locally appropriate subsoiling mode is screened out.
Specifically, after being determined, the optimization result is further deeply optimized by particle swarm optimization or a genetic algorithm in this embodiment.
The specific steps are as follows: determining structural features of the curved subsoiling shovel based on the optimization result; constructing an optimization function for the curved subsoiling shovel based on the structural features; determining constraints based on stress information, frequency information and boundary information of the curved subsoiling shovel; and optimizing the optimization function by particle swarm optimization based on the constraints to obtain the mass of the optimized curved subsoiling shovel.
Alternatively, the structural features include a density of the curved subsoiling shovel at each position, and structural parameters such as a curvature, a wall thickness and a height.
Relying on the three-dimensional model of the actual curved subsoiling shovel, this embodiment provides an optimization design method for a curved subsoiling shovel based on particle swarm optimization. Compared with a conventional design scheme of a curved subsoiling shovel, this optimization design method allows for effective reduction in the mass of the curved subsoiling shovel, a decrease in the overall manufacturing cost of the curved subsoiling shovel and hence promotion of the market competitiveness thereof on the basis of guaranteeing that the curved subsoiling shovel meets the requirements of safe and stable operation.
The present invention has the following beneficial effects:
In the present invention, topology optimization is carried out so that the resistance to a subsoiler in the process of advancing becomes smaller.
Thus, the energy efficiency of tillage is improved.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL2033205A NL2033205B1 (en) | 2022-09-30 | 2022-09-30 | Optimization method for subsoiling shovel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL2033205A NL2033205B1 (en) | 2022-09-30 | 2022-09-30 | Optimization method for subsoiling shovel |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NL2033205B1 true NL2033205B1 (en) | 2023-07-10 |
Family
ID=83996869
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
NL2033205A NL2033205B1 (en) | 2022-09-30 | 2022-09-30 | Optimization method for subsoiling shovel |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
NL (1) | NL2033205B1 (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103810327A (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2014-05-21 | 西北农林科技大学 | Equal-strength thinning and widening resistance reducing design method for soil subsoiling shovel handle |
CN107439061A (en) * | 2017-08-25 | 2017-12-08 | 东北农业大学 | Matched curve moldeed depth pine spade |
CN111373888A (en) * | 2020-04-22 | 2020-07-07 | 沈阳工业大学 | Layered deep loosening mechanism and deep loosening method thereof |
-
2022
- 2022-09-30 NL NL2033205A patent/NL2033205B1/en active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103810327A (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2014-05-21 | 西北农林科技大学 | Equal-strength thinning and widening resistance reducing design method for soil subsoiling shovel handle |
CN107439061A (en) * | 2017-08-25 | 2017-12-08 | 东北农业大学 | Matched curve moldeed depth pine spade |
CN111373888A (en) * | 2020-04-22 | 2020-07-07 | 沈阳工业大学 | Layered deep loosening mechanism and deep loosening method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
JIAN LIU ET AL: "Design and analysis of double plough body mechanism of sugarcane subsoiler", PROCEEDINGS OF THE SPIE, SPIE, US, vol. 12261, 20 September 2022 (2022-09-20), pages 1226122 - 1226122, XP060163940, ISSN: 0277-786X, ISBN: 978-1-5106-5738-0, DOI: 10.1117/12.2638709 * |
LYSYCH M N: "Review of numerical methods for modeling the interaction of soil environments with the tools of soil tillage machines", JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONFERENCE SERIES, INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING, BRISTOL, GB, vol. 1399, no. 4, 5 December 2019 (2019-12-05), pages 44014, XP020345940, ISSN: 1742-6596, [retrieved on 20191205], DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1399/4/044014 * |
MA LIUXUAN ET AL: "Computer aided design and simulation analysis for matsune shovel of stubble harvester", MECHANIC AUTOMATION AND CONTROL ENGINEERING (MACE), 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON, IEEE, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA, 26 June 2010 (2010-06-26), pages 381 - 383, XP031722918, ISBN: 978-1-4244-7737-1 * |
SONG WEI ET AL: "Increasing the width of disturbance of plough pan with bionic inspired subsoilers", SOIL AND TILLAGE RESEARCH, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 220, 8 March 2022 (2022-03-08), XP087019685, ISSN: 0167-1987, [retrieved on 20220308], DOI: 10.1016/J.STILL.2022.105356 * |
WANG WEI ET AL: "The finite element analysis be making application for subsoiler design", INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (ITAIC), 2011 6TH IEEE JOINT INTERNATIONAL, IEEE, 20 August 2011 (2011-08-20), pages 222 - 224, XP031967964, ISBN: 978-1-4244-8622-9, DOI: 10.1109/ITAIC.2011.6030315 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Li et al. | Biomimeitc design of a stubble-cutting disc using finite element analysis | |
Zeng et al. | Modelling the interaction of a deep tillage tool with heterogeneous soil | |
Topakci et al. | Deep tillage tool optimization by means of finite element method: Case study for a subsoiler tine | |
Shinde et al. | Design optimization in rotary tillage tool system components by computer aided EngineeringAnalysis | |
Wang et al. | Optimisation of installation parameters of subsoiler’wing using the discrete element method | |
Shinde et al. | Design analysis of rotary tillage tool components by CAD-tool: rotavator | |
Xirui et al. | Design and experiment of a bionic vibratory subsoiler for banana fields in southern China | |
Li et al. | Comparison of two subsoiler designs using the discrete element method (DEM) | |
Eltom et al. | Effect of trash board on moldboard plough performance at low speed and under two straw conditions | |
NL2033205B1 (en) | Optimization method for subsoiling shovel | |
Liu et al. | Structural bionic design for digging shovel of cassava harvester considering soil mechanics | |
Mollazade et al. | Application of dynamical analysis to choose best subsoiler’s shape using ANSYS | |
Jahanbakhshi et al. | Simulation and mechanical stress analysis of the lower link arm of a tractor using finite element method | |
Shinde et al. | Computer aided engineering analysis and design optimization of rotary tillage tool components | |
Zhang et al. | Study on rotary tillage cutting simulations and energy consumption predictions of sandy ground soil in a Xinjiang cotton field | |
Guo et al. | Bionic optimization research of soil cultivating component design | |
Torotwa et al. | 3D finite element analysis of the tillage and straw cutting performance of a curved-edged toothed disc | |
Niu et al. | Simulation and experimental study on drag reduction and anti-adhesion of subsoiler with bionic surface | |
Wang et al. | Bionic Optimization Design of Rotary Tiller Based on Fuzzy Algorithm | |
Constantin et al. | Structural analysis with finite elements of a subsoiler working part. | |
NL2033168B1 (en) | Design method for double-wing subsoiling shovel based on topology optimization | |
Topakci et al. | Technology Structural Optimisation of a Subsoiler: Structural Optimisation of a Subsoiler | |
Reddy et al. | Dynamic analysis on tillage equipment used in agriculture using ansys software | |
Liuxuan et al. | Computer aided design and simulation analysis for matsune shovel of stubble harvester | |
Awuah et al. | Performance Evaluation of Jerusalem Artichoke Digging Tool in Cohesive Soil Using Discrete Element Method |