NL2032761A - Method for constructing scene point for surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in watershed - Google Patents
Method for constructing scene point for surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in watershed Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NL2032761A NL2032761A NL2032761A NL2032761A NL2032761A NL 2032761 A NL2032761 A NL 2032761A NL 2032761 A NL2032761 A NL 2032761A NL 2032761 A NL2032761 A NL 2032761A NL 2032761 A NL2032761 A NL 2032761A
- Authority
- NL
- Netherlands
- Prior art keywords
- soil
- scene
- scene point
- constructing
- percentile
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 239000002352 surface water Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 143
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 230000004224 protection Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000004016 soil organic matter Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 244000223760 Cinnamomum zeylanicum Species 0.000 description 17
- 235000017803 cinnamon Nutrition 0.000 description 17
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 14
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 13
- 241000234314 Zingiber Species 0.000 description 11
- 235000006886 Zingiber officinale Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 235000008397 ginger Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 244000105017 Vicia sativa Species 0.000 description 3
- 244000050907 Hedychium coronarium Species 0.000 description 2
- 101100345589 Mus musculus Mical1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002262 irrigation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003973 irrigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 244000105624 Arachis hypogaea Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000002791 Brassica napus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000004977 Brassica sinapistrum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000012766 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012765 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. spontanea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012271 agricultural production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000009120 camo Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005607 chanvre indien Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011487 hemp Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020232 peanut Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/29—Geographical information databases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A20/00—Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
- Y02A20/152—Water filtration
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure discloses a method for constructing a scene point for a surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in a watershed, which includes obtaining land use type and distribution of a target watershed, obtaining meteorological data and soil texture data where the watershed is located to determine specific locations and crop types of the scene point, and determining a final scene point from preliminary screened alternative scene points based on factors such as expert decision— making and judgment. By Ineans of the construction. method, of a scene point for an exposure model, a large number of collected meteorological data and soil quality data are screened to obtain a small number of alternative scene points, then a representative scene point is finally determined by recalculating and analyzing the small number of alternative scene points.
Description
METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING SCENE POINT FOR SURFACE WATER PESTICIDE
EXPOSURE MODEL OF DRYLAND CROPS IN WATERSHED
The present disclosure relates to the technical field of sur- face water pesticide exposure of dryland crops in a watershed, in particular to a method for constructing a scene point for a sur- face water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in watershed.
Due to abundant water resources, large-scale crops are usual- ly planted in a watershed, and the crops are sprayed with pesti- cides many times during the growth cycle. After being used in the field, a large part of pesticides will enter the soil, run off in- to the surface water with the surface runoff or leaching into the groundwater with the soil pore water and flow into rivers, which causes great pollution to the river and the downstream ecology.
An exposure scene is a scene about how the exposure occurs, which includes various environmental conditions, risk source fea- tures and various activities that lead to the exposure when the exposure occurs. The exposure scene is a combination of various conditions related to agricultural production and pesticide use in a certain region, and is indispensable when using a model for ex- posure assessment. Without scene information, the model will not be able to run. The construction of the exposure scene is a highly comprehensive systematic work that requires comprehensive consid- eration of various factors. Therefore, the construction of the ex- posure scene is one of the key points of pesticide ecological risk assessment. A standard exposure scene represents typical “the re- alistic worst case” of a region, that is, the actual conditions that are most conducive to the pesticide pollution. The construc- tion of the standard exposure scene follows certain principles, if pesticides have low risks under the standard exposure scene, then pesticides should be safe to apply under other actual conditions.
The dryland crop-surface water exposure scene simulates the entry of pesticides into surface water after dryland crop application.
Scene information includes land use data, topographic data, mete- orological data, scil data, crop data and surface water related parameters of dryland crops.
In view of the above problems, the present disclosure aims to provide a method for constructing a scene point for a surface wa- ter pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in a watershed, in which, alternative scene points compliant with principles are screened by using meteorological data and soil data, and targeted pesticide exposure scene points along the watershed is determined, so that the simulation of pesticide exposure in a small region of the exposure scene points and the selection of a key pesticide va- riety list are carried out in the future.
In order to achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the tech- nical solutions adopted in the present disclosure are as follows: a method for constructing a scene point for a surface water pesti- cide exposure model of dryland crops in a watershed includes fol- lowing steps: 1) obtaining a land use distribution map in the watershed; 2) principles of constructing the scene point, wherein the principles include a site selection principle, a crop selection principle and a water body selection principle; 3) constructing a scene a, preliminarily screening the scene point: calculating per- centile and protection degree for each division region of the wa- tershed according to soil characteristics and precipitation condi- tions, and determining one or more alternative scene points pre- liminarily in the watershed according to collected precipitation and soil organic matter content of each division region; and b, determining the scene point: determining a specific loca- tion and a crop type of the scene point according to a crop plant- ing area, the protection degree and soil texture; and in the al- ternative scene points screened preliminarily, determining, based on expert decision-making and judgment, a final scene point ac- cording to planting situation, the soil texture and soil species distribution factors of a specific dryland crop.
Further, in the step of formulating the principle of con- structing the scene point, the site selection principle includes: annual precipitation: selecting a region with 70th to 90th percentile annual precipitation range; soil organic matter: se- lecting a region with 10th to 30th percentile organic matter range; soil texture: selecting a region with loam or moderate clay; the crop selection principle includes: selecting the dryland crops with a larger planting area in the watershed, or selecting local characteristic and typical crops; and the water body selection principle: water body types include ponds and rivers.
Further, the sub-step of preliminarily screening the scene point for constructing the scene includes: calculating percentile of the precipitation and the organic matter of various soil spe- cies by using a Percentile function, calculating the 70th to 90th percentile annual precipitation range and the 10th to 30th percen- tile organic matter range, and screening out points compliant with the protection degree around 95th as the alternative scene points.
Further, in the sub-step of preliminarily screening the scene point, a formula for calculating the protection degree is:
P=1-X{(1-Y) wherein, X represents percentile of the organic matter; Y represents percentile of the precipitation.
Further, in the sub-step of determining the scene point for constructing the scene, principles of the expert decision-making and judgment include: whether the soil texture is the loam or the moderate clay; whether the crop planting area is one of main local dryland crop planting regions, and is representative of crop planting situation in an entire region; and whether the construct- ed scene point meets the protection degree around 95th.
The beneficial effects of the present disclosure are: by means of the construction method of a scene point for an exposure model, a large number of collected meteorological data and soil quality data are screened to obtain a small number of alternative scene points, then, a representative scene point is finally deter-
mined by recalculating and analyzing the small number of alterna- tive scene points. On this basis, in the collection of pesticide varieties in the later period, the detailed collection and analy- sis of soil quality data is greatly reduced, so that in a rela- tively short period of time, the representative pesticide exposure varieties in the watershed are obtained, and the ecological envi- ronment of the watershed can be duickly restored by replacing or stopping their use in a targeted manner.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of constructing a scene point for a surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in a wa- tershed of the present disclosure; and
FIG. 2 is a land use distribution map in Shaying watershed of the present disclosure.
In order to enable those skilled in the art to better under- stand the technical solutions of the present disclosure, the tech- nical solutions of the present disclosure are further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
With reference to a method for constructing a scene point for a surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in a wa- tershed shown in FIG. 1, taking Shaying River as an example, a method for constructing a scene point for an exposure model in- cludes the following steps: 1) obtaining a land use distribution map in the watershed: the land use distribution map in Shaying River watershed is ob- tained from Resource and Environmental Science Data Center of In- stitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,
Chinese Academy of Sciences (see FIG. 2), land use data in the wa- tershed is analyzed, and the land use type in the study region is mainly dryland. 2) principles of constructing the scene point: when con- structing exposure scene, the general principle is the principle of “the realistic worst case”, that is, when determining the fea- tures of each factor included in the scene, it is necessary to se-
lect some “worst” feature that exists in reality as much as possi- ble, that is, the feature most conducive to pesticide pollution.
However, it should be noted that the “worst” herein does not refer to extremely bad conditions, but relatively bad conditions that 5 exist in reality. Only in this way can the obtained exposure value not be too conservative, and the high-level assessment can reflect its significance.
In the scene point construction of a surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in the Shaying River watershed, on the basis of following the general principle, combined with the characteristics of dryland crops and surface water, some specific principles need to be followed in the actual construction, which include: a site selection principle: ® annual precipitation: regions with high annual precipita- tion (within 70th to 90th percentile precipitation range, the larger the average annual precipitation, the easier it is to cause pesticides to enter surface water bodies with surface runoff, or leaching into groundwater) are selected; 2) soil organic matter: regions with low organic matter con- tent (within 10th to 30th percentile organic matter range, the or- ganic matter content is low, the pesticides are not easy to de- grade, and it is easy to cause the pesticides to enter the surface water) are selected; 3) soil texture: loam or moderate clay (for loam or moderate clay, pesticides are not easily leached into groundwater, but are more likely to enter surface water with surface runoff; for sand, loam or sandy soil, pesticides are easily leached into groundwa- ter) is selected. a crop selection principle: the dryland crops with a larger planting area in the Shaying
River watershed, such as common wheat, corn, peanuts, rapeseed, fruit trees, etc., are selected. At the same time, considering the representativeness of the scene, local characteristic and typical crops are also selected. a water body selection principle:
Commonly considered water types include ponds, rivers and so on. In the Shaying River watershed, the water body type of river is mainly considered. 3) constructing a scene a, preliminarily screening the scene point: soil data of counties and cities in the Shaying River watershed is collected from “China Soil Database” of the Nanjing Institute of Soil Sci- ence, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and basic soil characteristics of all counties and cities in the Shaying River watershed are col- lected, including: province, county and city, soil species name, soil subtype, land use, soil texture, soil species area and organ- ic matter content. Soil species data whose land use is dryland in the watershed is screened out, and the average organic matter in the topsoil layer of each soil species is calculated. A total of 81 soil species meet the requirements. See Table 1 for soil spe- cies data (partial data).
Table 1 Soil species data of counties and cities in Shaying
River watershed area average county and Soil species soil tex-
Province soil subtype (Hec- soil organic city name ture tares) matter(%)
Henan Xuchang Black soi! Chao soil 42333.3 SiC 0.99
Lingbao stand
Henan xuchang cinnamon soil 219533.3 SCL 0.86 loess
Less ginger calcareous
Henan xuchang grey black sand ginger 22533.3 LC 1.42 ginger soil black soil
Young cinna-
Henan xuchang cinnamon soil 42266.7 SiCL 0.82 mon soil
Henan xuchang silt Chao soil 5247333 LC 1.07
Dehydrated two- Dehydrated
Henan Yanling 132133.3 CL 0.8 component soil soil
Henan Zhengzhou white surface calcareous 163600 SCL 1.16 soil cinnamon soil
Thin hemp Neutral
Henan Zhengzhou bone stone coarse bone 1159000 SL 3.11 soil soil
Irrigation
Henan Zhengzhou thin tidal clay 33666.7 SiC 1.17
Chao soil
Gangging Dehydrated
Henan Zhengzhou 59666.7 LS 0.41 sandy soil soil
Red stiff petal
Henan Zhengzhou red clay 155733.3 LC 0.72 soil
Thick silt tide Irrigation
Henan Zhengzhou 22733.3 SiC 1.09 clay Chao soil
Calcium
Henan Zhengzhou Ballast soil coarse bone 28533.3 SL 1.25 soil
Live red stiff
Henan Zhengzhou red clay 57200 LC 1.47 petal soit
Ginger lying
Henan Zhengzhou cinnamon soil 27666.7 CL 0.89 loess
Lingbao stand
Henan Zhengzhou cinnamon soil 219533.3 SCL 0.86 loess calcareous
Henan Zhengzhou loessial soil 138000 SiCL 0.95 cinnamon soil
Mongolia gold
Henan Zhengzhou Chao soil 21066.7 L 0.87 soil
Neutral gravel ballast
Henan Zhengzhou coarse bone 29733.3 SL 2.13 soil soil
Wet light Salinized
Henan Zhengzhou 34466.7 SCL 0.77 saline soil Chao soil
Warm and
Salinized
Henan Zhengzhou medium saline 4133.3 CL 0.70
Chao soil soil
Henan Zhengzhou lying loess cinnamon soll 71800 CL 1.12
Little Mongo-
Henan Zhengzhou Chao soil 10600 SCL 0.6 lia gold soil
Henan Zhengzhou Waist sand Chao soil 8666.7 L 0.83
- wattw- compound soit
Henan Zhengzhou Waist sand silt Chao soil 13800 LC 1.07
Ginger lying
Henan Zhengzhou cinnamon soil 27666.7 CL 0.89 loess
Lingbao stand
Henan Zhengzhou cinnamon soil 219533.3 SCL 0.86 loess calcareous
Henan Zhengzhou loessial soil 138000 SiCL 0.95 cinnamon soil “Note: meaning of the soil tezture includes, C: clay; S: sand;
L: loam; and Si: silty soil.
Precipitation data: the data comes from the “China Ground Da- ta 1981-2010 Climate Standard Value Dataset” or local meteorologi- cal administration, and the data includes district station number, province, station name, longitude, latitude and average annual precipitation over 30 years. The average annual precipitation of 18 counties and cities in the Shaying watershed is collected, see
Table 2 (partial data).
Table 2 Average annual precipitation of counties and cities in the Shaying watershed “disteice
Average annual station Province station name longitude latitude precipitation (mm) number 57075 Henan Ruzhou 112.52 3410 63457 57078 Henan Ruyang 112.28 34.09 674.68 57083 Henan Zhengzhou 113.39 34.43 639.03 57089 Henan Xuchang 113.52 34.02 728.37 57095 Henan Yanling 114.09 34.07 738.74 57099 Henan Taikang 114.51 34.04 794.00 57162 Henan Songxian 112.05 34.09 691.14 57171 Henan Pingdingshan 113.07 33.46 925.63 57186 Henan Luohe 114.03 33.36 811.61 57192 Henan Huaiyang 114.51 33.44 788.93 57194 Henan Shangcai 114.16 33.17 864.15 57196 Henan Xiangxcheng 114.52 33.28 796.38 58100 Henan Dancheng 115.1 33.39 778.37
58101 Henan Luyi 115.29 33.52 755.99 58108 Anhui Jieshou 115.2 33.14 898.54 58109 Anhui Taihe 115.37 33.11 904.18 58203 Anhui Fuyang 115,44 32.52 966.47
Percentile of the precipitation and the organic matter of various soil species are calculated by using a Percentile function to obtain the 10th to 30th percentile organic matter range and the 70th to 90th percentile annual precipitation range in the water- shed.
Protection degree represents the conservation degree of the scene point and the protection of crops. If protection degree is too high, simulation results are too conservative and meaningless, and if protection degree is too low, most crops cannot be protect- ed. Therefore, the protection degree around 95th is selected. The protection degree of soil species is calculated according to per- centile of soil organic matter and corresponding percentile of the precipitation, and a calculation formula is:
P=1-X(1-Y) wherein, X represents the percentile of the organic matter; Y represents the percentile of the precipitation.
Table 3 Protection degree of some scene points average average protec- area soil soil annual
Prov- county Soil species tion soil subtype {Hec- tex- organic precipita- ince and city name de- tares) ture matter ta- gree(%) (%) tion{mm)
Ping- grey-green
Henan Grey Chao soil 20400 SL 0.45 925.63 0.995 dingshan sandy soil
Shuangmiao Sticky yellow
Anhui Fuyang 44333.3 CL 0.69 966.47 0.993
Chao Liver Soil cinnamon soil
White ginger sand ginger
Anhui Fuyang 233666.7 CL 0.76 966.47 0.988 soil black soil
Zheng- Gangqing Dehydrated
Henan 59666.67 LS 0.41 639.03 0.988 zhou sandy soi soil
Wolong bot-
Henan Luohe tom sand-ash Grey Chao soit 6333.3 SCL 0.55 811.61 0.983 two-compound soil
Dai'an Chao Sticky yellow
Anhui Fuyang 102000 LC 0.82 966.47 0.983
Liver Soil cinnamon soil
Little Mongolia
Henan Zhoukou Chao soi! 10600 SCL 0.60 823.80 0.982
Gold Soi!
Medium alka- Alkaline Chao
Anhui Tathe 5066.7 SiC 0.66 904.18 0.981 fine silt soil
Ping- brown lying
Henan cinnamonsoil 127600 SCL 0.72 925.63 0.973 dingshan loess
Suwang sand
Anhui Fuyang core two com- Chao soil 40466.7 CL 1.09 966.47 0.961 bined soil
Bottom sand dehumidifica- Dehydrated
Henan Luohe 2800 CL 0.68 811.61 0.961 tion two- soil component soil
Ping- Yellow cin-
Henan stiff loess 4857333 CL 0.80 925.63 0.960 dingshan namon soil
Anhui Fuyang black mud soil Chao soil 285800 C 1.15 966.47 0.956 zheng- Little Mongolia
Henan Chao soil 10600 SCL 0.60 639.03 0.953 zhou Gold Soil black ginger sand ginger
Anhui Fuyang 445866.7 LC 1.18 966.47 0.951 soil black soil 16 calculated points that meet the protection degree around 95th are taken as alternative scene points, and the basic charac- teristics of the alternative scene points are shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Basic characteristics of alternative scene points average average protec- area soil soil annual
Prov- county Soil species tion soil subtype (Hec- tex- organic precipi- ince andcity name de- tares) ture matter tation gree(%) {%) {mm)
Shuangmiao Sticky yellow
Anhui Fuyang 44333.3 CL 0.69 966.47 0.993
Chao Liver Soil cinnamon soil
White ginger sand ginger
Anhui Fuyang 233666.6 CL 0.76 966.47 0.988 soil black soil
Zheng- Gangging Dehydrated
Henan 59666.6 LS 0.41 639.03 0.988 zhou sandy soil soil
Henan Luohe Wolong bot- Grey Chao soil 6333.3 SCL 0.55 811.61 0.983 tom sand-ash two- compound soil
Dai'an Chao Sticky yellow
Anhui Fuyang 102000 LC 0.82 966.47 0.983
Liver Soil cinnamon soil
Zhouko Little Mongo-
Henan Chao soil 10600 SCL 0.60 823.80 0.982 u lia Gold Soil
Medium Alkaline Chao
Anhui Taihe 5066.6 SiC 0.66 904.18 0.981 alkaline silt soil
Ping- brown lying
Henan dingsha cinnamon soil 127600 SCL 0.72 925.63 0.973 loess n
Suwang sand
Anhui Fuyang core two Chao soil 40466.6 CL 1.09 966.47 0.961 combined soil
Bottom sand dehumidifica-
Dehydrated
Henan Luohe tion two- | 2800 CL 0.68 811.61 0.961 soi component soil
Ping- yellow cinna-
Henan dingsha stiff loess 4857333 CL 0.80 925.63 0.960 mon soil n
Anhui Fuyang black mud soil Chao soil 285800 C 1.15 966.47 0.956
Zheng- Little Mongo-
Henan Chao soil 10600 SCL 0.60 639.03 0.953 zhou lia gold soil black ginger sand ginger
Anhui Fuyang 445866.6 LC 1.18 966.47 0.951 soil black soil
Ping- calcareous
Henan dingsha loessial soil 138000 SiCL 0.95 925.63 0.917 cinnamon soil n
Songxia brown lying
Henan cinnamonsoil 127600 SCL 0.72 691.14 0.916 n loess b, determining the scene point:
The scene is a composite of various information related to crops. Therefore, the determination of the scene point needs to be based on a large amount of basic data, combined with judgment and decision-making of experts in the industry. When determining the scene, first whether the soil texture is loam or moderate clay is considered, because in the loam or moderate clay, pesticides are not easy to degrade, and pesticides easily enter surface water with surface runoff; secondly, whether the crop planting area of the scene is one of the main local dryland crop planting regions, and is representative of crop planting situation in an entire re- gion are considered; finally, the constructed scene point meets the protection degree around 95th according to the basic princi- ples of scene construction. According to the principles of con- structing the scene, with the above screening methods, Ping- dingshan in Henan is finally determined as a dryland crop-surface water pesticide exposure scene point in the Shaying River water- shed by means of field research. The basic features of the scene point are shown in Table 5.
Table 5 Basic features of scene point average annual county Soil spe- soil sub- soil tex- average soil organ- protection
Province precipitation ( and city cies type ture ic matter (%) degree (%) mm) yellow
Ping-
Henan stiff loess cinnamon CL 0.80 925.63 96.0 dingshan soil
In the embodiment, based on the general principle of “the re- alistic worst case”, scene point construction of dryland crops in the Shaying River watershed is carried out, which mainly includes preliminarily screening the scene point and determining the scene point. Finally, after a comprehensive judgment, Pingdingshan in
Henan is determined as a surface water pesticide exposure scene point for dryland crops in the Shaying River watershed, whose pro- tection degree is 96th.
The above shows and describes the basic principles, main fea- tures and advantages of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art should understand that the present disclosure is not lim- ited by the above-mentioned embodiments, and the foregoing embodi- ments and descriptions in the specification are only intended to illustrate the principles of the present disclosure. Without de- parting from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, the present disclosure will have various changes and improvements, and these changes all fall within the scope of the claimed disclosure.
The claimed scope of the present disclosure is defined by the ap- pended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (5)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210157791.3A CN114529199A (en) | 2022-02-21 | 2022-02-21 | Method for constructing surface water pesticide exposure model scene point of drainage basin dry land crops |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NL2032761A true NL2032761A (en) | 2023-08-25 |
NL2032761B1 NL2032761B1 (en) | 2024-02-02 |
Family
ID=81624825
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
NL2032761A NL2032761B1 (en) | 2022-02-21 | 2022-08-16 | Method for constructing scene point for surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in watershed |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN114529199A (en) |
NL (1) | NL2032761B1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113588875B (en) * | 2021-07-12 | 2023-03-14 | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所 | Experimental device for verifying accuracy of exposure evaluation of PRAESS model on carpropamid |
-
2022
- 2022-02-21 CN CN202210157791.3A patent/CN114529199A/en active Pending
- 2022-08-16 NL NL2032761A patent/NL2032761B1/en active
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
BROWN COLIN D ET AL: "Exposure to sulfosulfuron in agricultural drainage ditches: field monitoring and scenario-based modelling", PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, vol. 60, no. 8, 22 March 2004 (2004-03-22), Hoboken, USA, pages 765 - 776, XP093099910, ISSN: 1526-498X, DOI: 10.1002/ps.876 * |
LAUREN PADILLA ET AL: "Development of groundwater pesticide exposure modeling scenarios for vulnerable spring and winter wheat-growing areas", INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, US, vol. 13, no. 6, 13 May 2017 (2017-05-13), pages 992 - 1006, XP072313598, ISSN: 1551-3777, DOI: 10.1002/IEAM.1925 * |
LINDERS J ET AL: "FOCUS SURFACE WATER SCENARIOS IN THE EU EVALUATION PROCESS UNDER 91/414/EEC. Report prepared by the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios", 31 May 2003 (2003-05-31), XP093099916, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40147679_FOCUS_surface_water_scenario_development/link/55b5fa4608aec0e5f436ce12/download> [retrieved on 20231109] * |
THAMIRES SÁ DE OLIVEIRA KAMINSKI ET AL: "Parameterization of a Brazilian scenario in the USEPA Pesticide in Water Calculator tool to estimate the environmental exposure of pesticide in surface waters", INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, US, vol. 18, no. 5, 2 February 2022 (2022-02-02), pages 1387 - 1398, XP072495028, ISSN: 1551-3777, DOI: 10.1002/IEAM.4567 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN114529199A (en) | 2022-05-24 |
NL2032761B1 (en) | 2024-02-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Xu et al. | A multi-scale study on land use and land cover quality change: the case of the Yellow River Delta in China | |
CN105009768B (en) | A kind of maximum allowable input method for determination of amount of Watershed Scale chemical nitrogen fertilizer | |
Khan et al. | Hydrological modeling of upper Indus Basin and assessment of deltaic ecology | |
Gobin et al. | Soil erosion assessment at the Udi‐Nsukka Cuesta (southeastern Nigeria) | |
Joshi et al. | Estimating soil loss from a watershed in Western Deccan, India, using revised universal soil loss equation | |
Kar et al. | Spatial distribution of soil hydro-physical properties and morphometric analysis of a rainfed watershed as a tool for sustainable land use planning | |
Wang et al. | Significant differences in agro-hydrological processes and water productivity between canal-and well-irrigated areas in an arid region | |
Arifin et al. | Analysis of Changes in Land Use Patterns for Erosion and Sediment Prediction | |
Patıl et al. | Identification of potential zones on the estimation of direct runoff and soil erosion for an ungauged watershed based on remote sensing and GIS techniques | |
Farzana et al. | Application of swat model for assessing water availability in Surma River basin | |
NL2032761B1 (en) | Method for constructing scene point for surface water pesticide exposure model of dryland crops in watershed | |
Celine et al. | Assessing the implications of extension of rubber plantation on the hydrology of humid tropical river basin | |
Waithaka et al. | Assessing the effects of land use/land cover change on discharge using SWAT model in river ruiru watershed, kiambu county, Kenya | |
Singh et al. | Developing a conceptual model for water accounting in peri-urban catchments | |
Kumar | Impacts of climate change and land-use change on the water resources of the Upper Kharun Catchment, Chhattisgarh, India | |
Barman et al. | Introspect into Reservoir Sedimentation in Some Chotanagpur Plateau Drainage Basin | |
Satapathy et al. | Estimation of Surface Runoff Using SWAT Model and ArcGIS Approach. | |
Manan et al. | Correlation between runoff volume and land use changes using SCS-CN method for Sungai Gombak catchment | |
Mudigandla et al. | Rainfall runoff modelling of IB sub-basin of Mahanadi river system using SWAT model | |
Ahn et al. | Comparison of SWAT streamflow and water quality in an agricultural watershed using KOMPSAT-2 and landsat land use information | |
Anejionu et al. | Modelling nonpoint source pollution of the southern section of Enugu State through GIS and Remote Sensing | |
Shee et al. | Hydrological Impact of Landuse Conversion | |
Samipour et al. | Distributed Sub-Daily Agro-Hydrological Modeling of a Sugarcane Farming System with Combinational Free/Controlled Subsurface Drainage Management | |
Chen et al. | Impact of Urbanization on Hydrological Processes: A Case Study of Xinji River in Southern China | |
Chen et al. | Parameter dynamics of distributed hydrological model in simulating or forecasting flood processes of urbanizing watersheds |