KR20230144373A - System for evaluating lecture - Google Patents

Abstract

This technology discloses an evaluation system using a blockchain network. A specific implementation example of this technology is that service providers and school contributions can be evaluated through coins between each evaluator and service provider, thereby improving participation in evaluation, and the authentication results for each evaluator are verified through a blockchain network. Since service provision and school contribution are evaluated by an authorized evaluator based on this, the reliability of the evaluation results can be improved and the anonymity of the evaluator can be guaranteed.

Description

Evaluation system using blockchain network {SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING LECTURE}

The present invention relates to an evaluation system using a blockchain network. More specifically, in performing evaluations for each predetermined evaluation item, the anonymity of the evaluator can be improved by using the blockchain network, and thus, academic studies including lectures can be improved. It is about technology that can improve the reliability and participation in the evaluation results of activities.

Recently, research on a lecture evaluation system that can improve the quality of lectures by collecting student opinions is being actively conducted at universities, as students who have taken the lecture evaluate the lecturer's teaching ability through online surveys.

Accordingly, while teachers with good lecture evaluation results are given rewards (incentives), teachers with poor evaluation results are sometimes disadvantaged in terms of reappointment or promotion.

However, most evaluators do not retake the same course, except in some cases where they retake the course, and they evaluate the course as a pre-stage of confirming grades, so there is a strong tendency to think of the course evaluation itself as a formal process. This leads to a decrease in the sincerity and fairness of the overall course evaluation results.

Meanwhile, this kind of evaluation is based on the premise of anonymity, but because the evaluation data is recorded, there is a problem that the reliability of anonymity is also lowered from the evaluator's perspective.

Therefore, a separate method is needed to ensure the anonymity of course evaluation, improve the reliability of course evaluation results, and encourage active participation of evaluators and faculty.

Therefore, the present invention is intended to improve the anonymity of the evaluator by using a blockchain network when performing evaluation for each predetermined evaluation item, thereby improving reliability and participation in the lecture evaluation results. In addition to lecture evaluations, this can also be used to evaluate school contributions, such as evaluating faculty and staff's administrative services or participating in various school competitions.

The object of the present invention is not limited to the object mentioned above, and other objects and advantages of the present invention that are not mentioned can be understood through the following description and will be more clearly understood through the examples of the present invention. In addition, it will be readily apparent that the objects and advantages of the present invention can be realized by means and combinations thereof as indicated in the claims.

An evaluation system using a blockchain network according to an embodiment of the present invention,

A management server that generates a set coin for each set evaluation item and delivers it to at least one evaluator;

an evaluation unit that pays a coin matching the evaluation item of a coin delivered to at least one evaluator based on the management server to the service provider as an evaluation result; and

One feature is that it includes a reward unit that performs electronic commerce or commercial transactions with coins paid by the service provider.

Preferably, the evaluation items are:

It is at least one of evaluation item 1 for the professor's lecture content, evaluation item 2 for the faculty member's administrative service, and evaluation item 3 for the school's contribution, and the evaluator is a student who took the lecture included in evaluation item 1, and evaluation item 2 For assessment item 3, all students and faculty are students, staff, and professors, and for assessment item 3, the service provider is at least a professor among assessment item 1, faculty and staff for assessment item 2, and students, staff, and professors for assessment item 3. It could be one.

Preferably, the management server is,

In the case of evaluation item 1, the first coin can be issued in a set number based on the number of credits taken and the number of people registered for the course, and the issued first coin can be delivered to the students who have applied for each course.

Preferably, the management server is,

In the case of evaluation item 2, a predetermined number of second coins can be issued and the generated second coins can be delivered to all students.

Preferably, the management server is,

In the case of evaluation item 3, a set number of third coins may be issued as prize money for each competition, and the third coin may be provided to at least one of the students, faculty, and professors who won the competition.

Preferably each type of coin is

It may include usage time information and evaluation history information that matches each evaluation item.

Preferably, the management server is,

If the usage time information for the coin is exceeded, the remaining issued coins may be destroyed.

Preferably the management server is

It may be equipped to use a blockchain network to perform authentication for each evaluator who participated in the evaluation and to deliver at least one of three types of coins to the authorized evaluator upon successful authentication.

According to one embodiment, the contribution of service providers and schools can be evaluated through coins between each evaluator and service provider, thereby improving participation in evaluation, and permission is granted based on the authentication results for each evaluator through a private blockchain network. Since the service provision and school contribution are evaluated by a qualified evaluator, the reliability of the evaluation results can be improved and the anonymity of the evaluator can be clearly guaranteed.

The following drawings attached to this specification illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention, and together with the detailed description of the invention described later, serve to further understand the technical idea of the present invention. Therefore, the present invention includes the matters described in such drawings. It should not be interpreted as limited to only .
1 is a configuration diagram of an evaluation system to which an embodiment is applied.
Figure 2 is a diagram showing the processing process of the evaluation system shown in Figure 1.

Specific structural or functional descriptions of the embodiments are disclosed for illustrative purposes only and may be modified and implemented in various forms. Accordingly, the embodiments are not limited to the specific disclosed form, and the scope of the present specification includes changes, equivalents, or substitutes included in the technical spirit.

Terms such as first or second may be used to describe various components, but these terms should be interpreted only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another component. For example, a first component may be named a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be named a first component.

When a component is referred to as being “connected” to another component, it should be understood that it may be directly connected or connected to the other component, but that other components may exist in between.

Singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. In this specification, terms such as “comprise” or “have” are intended to designate the presence of the described features, numbers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof, and are intended to indicate the presence of one or more other features or numbers, It should be understood that this does not exclude in advance the possibility of the presence or addition of steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

Unless otherwise defined, all terms used herein, including technical or scientific terms, have the same meaning as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the relevant technical field. Terms as defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having meanings consistent with the meanings they have in the context of the related technology, and unless clearly defined in this specification, should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense. No.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail by explaining preferred embodiments of the present invention with reference to the attached drawings.

FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of an evaluation system according to an embodiment, and FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a processing algorithm of the evaluation system 100 of FIG. 1. Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the evaluation system 100 according to an embodiment may include at least one of a management server 1, an evaluation unit 2, and a reward unit 3, and The system 100 can deliver coins for each evaluation item issued by the management server 1 to at least one evaluator and perform commercial transactions with the service provider using the coins received as a result of the evaluator's evaluation.

The management server (1) issues each coin for evaluation item 1 for the professor's lecture content, evaluation item 2 for the faculty member's administrative service, and evaluation item 3 for the school contribution, and each coin is distributed to each issued evaluation item. Distribute to evaluators (at least one professor, staff member, or student) performing the evaluation.

Here, the evaluator performs authentication for the evaluator using data (registration information of professors, faculty, and students) already registered in the management server (1) through a private blockchain network, and as a result of the authentication, three types of evaluators are provided to the authorized evaluator. At least one of the coins is distributed.

Here, the private (closed) blockchain network is a blockchain that allows participation in a blockchain network between evaluators with legal responsibility. For example, the scope of evaluators is determined according to the regulations established in the management server (1). is decided. Other examples could be a separate central management server or a financial institution.

As it is a blockchain in which a small number of evaluators approved as a result of authentication participate, confidentiality is strengthened and transmission speed is faster than existing blockchain networks.

In other words, the difference between a private blockchain network and an open blockchain can be represented in Table 1 below.

[Table 1]

Here, a series of processes for authenticating the evaluator using a private blockchain network are performed on the evaluator determined by the regulations of the management server (1), and are the same as the authentication for payments performed by authorized banking institutions, etc. Because it is similar, it is not specifically disclosed in this specification, but will be understood at the level of those skilled in the art.

Meanwhile, the management server (1) issues the first coin that matches evaluation item 1 of the professor's lecture content and distributes it to students who have registered for the lecture, and the number of first coins issued is determined by the number of credits taken and the number of students enrolled in the course. It is determined based on, and the first coin issued includes information on the set usage time and evaluation items. Here, the designated usage time information is the semester start and semester end dates, and the evaluation item information is an evaluation of the lecture content of the professor who applied for the course.

The evaluation department (2) can evaluate the content of the professor's lecture based on the students who have taken the course and deliver a portion of the coins matching evaluation item 1 received as a result of the evaluation to the professor who is the service provider.

Here, the maximum number of first coins that can be issued is determined according to the credits for each lecture and the number of students taking each lecture. It is distributed to evaluators (students) taking each lecture.

For example, referring to Table 2 below, based on 1000 coins per credit and 10 coins per student, if there are 50 students taking the course for 3 credits, the maximum amount of the first coin issued by the management server (1) is The number is 3

And if the number of coins that can be provided by the service provider (professor) per student determined according to the evaluation department (2) is a maximum of 10 coins, the maximum coins that the service provider can receive is 50

Course evaluators (students) can freely pay the first coin for the course in multiple installments not only at the end of the semester but also during the entire course period. However, by placing an upper limit on the number of coins that evaluators can pay to specific lectures, we prevent coins from being concentrated only in specific lectures, and we also specify an upper limit on the number of coins that individual lectures by service providers (professors) can receive, so that only specific service providers can receive coins. Make sure coins do not accumulate excessively.

[Table 2]

Accordingly, the service provider (professor) can estimate students' evaluation of the lecture using the coins collected for each lecture. Additionally, the evaluation unit (2) adds up the coins provided to the service provider for each lecture during the usage period (start and end of semester) and transfers them to the management server (1).

And the reward department 3 can perform electronic commerce or commercial transactions by the service provider (professor) using the first coin received from the evaluator. For example, the first coin for evaluation item 1 can be paid for items purchased at restaurants and stores on campus through e-commerce or commercial transactions, or can be cashed through the school as an incentive for those who excel in class. At this time, the reward unit 3 determines and stores transaction conditions with the first coin of a pre-registered e-commerce or commerce shopping mall, store, etc., and performs payment processing for e-commerce and authentication of evaluators (students).

Afterwards, the management server (1) deletes unused coins or undistributed remaining coins among the issued coins if the specified usage period information is exceeded. Accordingly, coins issued during the usage time at the beginning and end of the semester can be used for e-commerce or commercial transactions, but afterward, the first coin matching evaluation item 1 is used and unused or undistributed coins are deleted. Therefore, the anonymity of the evaluator can be guaranteed, and the participation of professors in course evaluation and the reliability of the evaluation results can be improved.

Meanwhile, the management server (1) issues a second coin that matches evaluation item 2 for the administrative service of the faculty member and distributes the issued second coin to all students, and the former student who received the second coin is sent to the evaluation department (2) ), the second coin is delivered to the faculty member as a result of the evaluation of the faculty member's administrative service. At this time, the second coin is given as a reward to the faculty member as a result of the evaluation of the faculty member's administrative service. Here, the number of second coins is determined by the designer as a fixed number.

Faculty and staff who have received the second coin can carry out e-commerce or commercial transactions with the second coin at restaurants and stores on campus designated according to the reward department (3), or cash it out for use as incentives for excellent employees.

Afterwards, the management server (1) deletes unused coins or undistributed remaining coins among the issued coins when the set usage period information of the second coin is exceeded. Accordingly, coins issued during the usage time at the beginning and end of the semester can be used, and thereafter, the use of the second coin matching evaluation item 2 and unused or undistributed coins are deleted. Therefore, an evaluation of the administrative services of the teaching staff is carried out.

Additionally, the management server (1) issues a third coin that matches evaluation item 3 according to the student's contribution to the school, and delivers the issued third coin to the evaluation unit (2).

The evaluation department (2) distributes the issued third coins to at least one of the students, staff, and professors who contributed to the school based on a predetermined reward amount. Here, school contribution refers to spreading the name of the school by participating in various competitions and winning prize money (participation prize or prize money), and the number of third coins is determined based on the prize money earned.

The third coin delivered to at least one of the students, staff, and professors who contributed to the school based on the designated reward can be used through commerce or e-commerce at restaurants and stores on campus determined in accordance with the reward department (3), or can be cashed out for reward purposes. You can.

Afterwards, the management server (1) deletes unused coins or undistributed remaining coins among the issued coins if the designated usage period information of the third coin is exceeded.

In one embodiment, participation in evaluation can be improved by evaluating service providers and school contributions through coins between each evaluator and service provider, and permission is granted based on the authentication results for each evaluator through a private blockchain network. Since the service provision and school contribution are evaluated by the evaluator, the reliability of the evaluation results can be improved and the anonymity of the evaluator can be guaranteed.

Although the embodiments have been described with limited drawings as described above, those skilled in the art can apply various technical modifications and variations based on the above. For example, the described techniques are performed in a different order than the described method, and/or components of the described system, structure, device, circuit, etc. are combined or combined in a different form than the described method, or other components are used. Alternatively, appropriate results may be achieved even if substituted or substituted by an equivalent.

In one embodiment, participation in evaluation can be improved by evaluating the contribution of service providers and schools through coins between each evaluator and service provider, and authorized evaluators based on the authentication results for each evaluator through a blockchain network. Since the evaluation of service provision and school contribution is performed, the reliability of the evaluation results can be improved and the anonymity of the evaluator can be guaranteed.

100: Evaluation system
1: Management server
2: Evaluation department
3: Reward Department

Claims (6)

A management server that generates a set coin for each set evaluation item and delivers it to at least one evaluator;
an evaluation unit that pays a coin matching the evaluation item of a coin delivered to at least one evaluator based on the management server to the service provider as an evaluation result; and
An evaluation system using a blockchain network, characterized in that it includes a reward department that performs electronic commerce or commercial transactions with coins paid by the service provider. The method of claim 1, wherein the evaluation items are:
At least one of evaluation item 1 for the professor's lecture content, evaluation item 2 for the faculty member's administrative service, and evaluation item 3 for the school's contribution,
The evaluators are students who took the course included in evaluation item 1, former students and professors for evaluation item 2, and students, employees, and professors for evaluation item 3.
An evaluation system using a blockchain network, wherein the service provider is at least one of a professor for evaluation item 1, a faculty member for evaluation item 2, and a student, faculty, and professor for evaluation item 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the management server,
In the case of evaluation item 1, a blockchain network is provided that issues the first coin in a set number based on the number of credits taken and the number of people who have registered for the course and delivers the issued first coin to the students who have registered for each course. Evaluation system used. The method of claim 2, wherein the management server,
In the case of evaluation item 2, an evaluation system using a blockchain network is provided to issue a predetermined number of second coins and deliver the generated second coins to all students. The method of claim 2, wherein the management server,
In the case of evaluation item 3, a blockchain network is provided to issue a set number of third coins as prize money for each competition and deliver the third coins to at least one of the students, faculty, and professors who won the competition. Evaluation system used. The method of claim 2, wherein the management server,
An evaluation system using a blockchain network, characterized in that it is provided to destroy the remaining coins issued when the usage time information of the coin is exceeded.