KR20210097024A - Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease - Google Patents

Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20210097024A
KR20210097024A KR1020210006201A KR20210006201A KR20210097024A KR 20210097024 A KR20210097024 A KR 20210097024A KR 1020210006201 A KR1020210006201 A KR 1020210006201A KR 20210006201 A KR20210006201 A KR 20210006201A KR 20210097024 A KR20210097024 A KR 20210097024A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
cystic
acid
bacillus
active treatment
composition
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020210006201A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Other versions
KR102549525B1 (en
Inventor
김광훈
김로원
이정은
임헌주
Original Assignee
공주대학교 산학협력단
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 공주대학교 산학협력단 filed Critical 공주대학교 산학협력단
Publication of KR20210097024A publication Critical patent/KR20210097024A/en
Priority to KR1020230081221A priority Critical patent/KR20230098121A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR102549525B1 publication Critical patent/KR102549525B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N37/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids
    • A01N37/02Saturated carboxylic acids or thio analogues thereof; Derivatives thereof
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N29/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing halogenated hydrocarbons
    • A01N29/02Acyclic compounds or compounds containing halogen attached to an aliphatic side-chain of a cycloaliphatic ring system
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01PBIOCIDAL, PEST REPELLANT, PEST ATTRACTANT OR PLANT GROWTH REGULATORY ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR PREPARATIONS
    • A01P3/00Fungicides

Abstract

The present invention relates to an active treatment agent which can effectively control Olpidiopsis porphyrae var. koreanae that causes the greatest damage to laver farms, thereby preventing disease of laver, promoting the growth of laver, and improving the quality of the harvested laver. More specifically, the present invention relates to an active treatment agent composition for simultaneous control of Olpidiopsis porphyrae var. koreanae and Pythium porphyrae comprising a mixture of lactic acid, propionic acid, and hydrochloric acid.

Description

김의 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물{Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease}Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

본 발명은 김 양식장에 가장 큰 피해를 주는 낭균병과 붉은갯병을 동시에 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김의 병해를 방지하면서 김의 생장을 촉진하고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있는 김의 낭균병과 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제에 관한 것이다. The present invention can effectively control both cystic bacillus and red seaweed, which cause the greatest damage to laver farms, at the same time, thereby promoting the growth of laver and improving the quality of the harvested laver while preventing the disease of laver. It relates to an active treatment agent for the simultaneous control of

해조류는 전세계적으로 식품 및 식이 보조제, 동물 사료, 화학 물질 및 바이오 연료로 수천 년동안 사용돼 왔다. 특히 아시아에서는 식품으로서의 해조류 활용이 주로 이루어지고 있어 김, 미역, 다시마의 양식 산업이 발전해왔다. 2017년 통계에 따르면, 주 양식종인 김, 미역, 다시마 중에서도 김은 총 생산량의 29.6%, 총 생산금액의 71%를 차지하고 있으며, 수출금액 5억 달러를 달성하여 주요 수출 품목으로 자리잡고 꾸준한 성장세를 보이고 있다.Seaweed has been used for thousands of years worldwide as food and dietary supplements, animal feed, chemicals and biofuels. In particular, in Asia, seaweed is mainly used as food, and the aquaculture industry of laver, seaweed, and kelp has developed. According to statistics in 2017, seaweed accounts for 29.6% of the total production and 71% of the total production value among laver, seaweed, and kelp, which are the main cultivated species. is showing

우리나라에서 양식되는 김의 종류에는 방사무늬김(Pyropia yezoensis), 잇바디돌김(Pyropia dentata), 모무늬돌김(Pyropia seriata)이 있으며, 특히 양식장에서는 생산성이 높은 품종이 선호됨에 따라 방사무늬김 양식이 꾸준히 증가하는 추세이다. 김의 생산량은 해수, 기후 및 해양 조건 등의 자연적 요인과 김 엽체의 퇴색 및 김발에서의 엽체 유실을 일으키는 갯병에 의해 크게 영향을 받는다. 특히 갯병의 경우 김의 품질을 저하시키거나, 생산량을 감소시켜 어민들에게 큰 피해를 주고 있다. 우리나라에서 발생하는 대표적인 갯병은 낭균병(Olpidiopsis blight), 녹반병(Green-spot disease), 붉은갯병(Red-rot disease)이 있으며, 비교적 수온이 높은 양식 초기인 11~12월과 끝 무렵인 2~3월에 주로 발병한다.The types of laver cultivated in Korea include Pyropia yezoensis , Pyropia dentata , and Pyropia seriata . there is an increasing trend. The production of laver is greatly affected by natural factors such as seawater, climatic and marine conditions, as well as seaweed causing fading of laver fronds and loss of fronds from laver. In particular, in the case of seaweed, the quality of laver is reduced or production is reduced, causing great damage to fishermen. The representative fish diseases that occur in Korea are Olpidiopsis blight, Green-spot disease, and Red-rot disease. Occurs mainly in March.

갯병 중에서도 Oomycete강에 속한 붉은갯병균(Pythium porphyrae)과 낭균 (Olpidiopsis spp.)에 의해 발병하는 붉은갯병과 낭균병은 김 양식장에 가장 큰 피해를 주고 있다. 이는 붉은갯병균과 낭균은 김을 직접적으로 감염시키는 유주자를 계속해서 형성, 방출할 수 있는 두 질병균의 생식 및 감염기작 특성과 관련이 깊다. 이로 인해 김 양식장에 두 가지 갯병이 동시에 출현하는 경우 김 양식장에 큰 피해를 주게 되며, 김 양식장에서는 거의 항상 붉은갯병과 낭균병이 함께 발생한다. Among the seaweed, red seaweed and cysticercosis caused by Pythium porphyrae and Olpidiopsis spp. belonging to the Oomycete River cause the greatest damage to seaweed farms. This is closely related to the reproductive and infection mechanism characteristics of the two pathogens, which are capable of continuously forming and releasing scavengers that directly infect seaweed. For this reason, if two types of seaweed appear at the same time in laver farms, it will cause great damage to the laver farms, and red seaweed and cystic bacillus almost always occur together in laver farms.

우리나라 김 양식장에서는 갯병을 방제하기 위한 방안으로 35% 염산인 무기산을 주로 사용해왔다. 1994년 산처리제의 사용기준을 고시로 제정한 후 무기산의 사용이 제한되면서, 1998년부터 무기산을 대체하기 위해 유기산에 무기산을 혼합한 혼합액을 활성처리제로 개발하여 사용하고 있다. 현재 김 양식장에서 사용할 수 있는 모든 활성처리제는 염산 8.0~9.5%, 유기산 10% 이상을 포함하도록 되어 있다. 현실적으로 유기산은 매우 비싸 실제로 10% 이상을 사용하는 경우는 거의 없으며, 염산이 들어가지 않으면 부착물 찌꺼기 등이 제거되지 않아 어민들이 아예 사용을 하지 않으므로 현실성이 없다. In Korean laver farms, inorganic acid, which is 35% hydrochloric acid, has been mainly used as a method to control seaweed. Since the use of inorganic acids was restricted after enacting the standard for use of acid treatment agents as a notification in 1994, a mixed solution mixed with organic acids and inorganic acids has been developed and used as an active treatment agent to replace inorganic acids since 1998. Currently, all active treatment agents that can be used in laver farms contain 8.0~9.5% hydrochloric acid and 10% or more organic acid. Realistically, organic acids are very expensive, so it is rarely used more than 10%, and if hydrochloric acid is not added, it is unrealistic because fishermen do not use it at all because the deposits are not removed.

활성처리제의 주성분으로 들어가는 유기산은 산성을 띠는 유기화합물로 곰팡이, 미생물의 성장을 억제하며 식품의 부패 방지에도 널리 쓰이고 있다. 유기산의 항균 효과 및 작용 범위는 유기산의 종류 및 생화화적 특성에 의해 차이를 보인다. 갯병과 관련된 유기산의 항균효과는 붉은갯병을 일으키는 붉은갯병균에 대해서 젖산, 말산, 구연산, 글루콘산, 타타르산의 효능이 보고된 바 있지만, 낭균병에 대한 유기산의 항균효과는 보고된 바 없다. 또한 기존의 갯병 방제 방안이었던 염산을 처리할 시에도 숙주인 김 세포 내의 낭균은 손상을 주지 않아 방제 효과가 없음이 보고되어 낭균병 방제에 효과적인 활성처리제의 개발이 시급하다. The organic acid, which is the main component of the active treatment agent, is an acidic organic compound that inhibits the growth of mold and microorganisms and is widely used to prevent food spoilage. The antibacterial effect and action range of organic acids are different depending on the type and biochemical characteristics of the organic acid. As for the antibacterial effect of organic acids related to cystic larvae, the efficacy of lactic acid, malic acid, citric acid, gluconic acid, and tartaric acid has been reported for the red cyst bacillus that causes cystic larvae. In addition, it is reported that there is no control effect because it does not damage the cystic bacteria in the laver cells, which is the host, even when hydrochloric acid is treated, which was the existing method for controlling cystic bacteria.

이에 더하여 김 양식장에서는 낭균병과 붉은갯병이 거의 항상 발병하기 때문에 두 질병을 동시에 잡지 않으면 실질적인 갯병 구제는 이루어지지 않는다. 하나의 질병만을 제어하는 경우에는 도리어 다른 질병이 손쉽게 퍼질 가능성이 높아지게 되는데 두 질병을 모두 잡을 수 있는 처리제가 없어서 그동안 골머리를 앓아 왔다. 어민들은 그저 높은 농도의 염산을 처리하는 것으로만 대응하다 보니 많은 불법행위와 그에 따른 다양한 사회적 문제가 발생하여 왔다. In addition, since cystic bacillus and cystic leprosy almost always occur in seaweed farms, effective control of cystic leprosy cannot be achieved unless both diseases are caught at the same time. In the case of controlling only one disease, the possibility of spreading other diseases easily increases, but there is no treatment that can catch both diseases. As fishermen respond only by treating high concentrations of hydrochloric acid, many illegal activities and various social problems have occurred.

또한 염산을 대체하고자 개발된 활성처리제는 염산에 비해 처리 비용이 높고, 처리 시간이 길 뿐만 아니라, 현재까지도 무기산인 염산의 불법 사용이 만연해 사회적으로 문제가 되고 있다. In addition, the active treatment agent developed to replace hydrochloric acid has a higher treatment cost and longer treatment time than hydrochloric acid.

등록특허 제10-1752610호Registered Patent No. 10-1752610 공개특허 제10-2000-0060843호Patent Publication No. 10-2000-0060843 일본 등록특허 제3595004호Japanese Registered Patent No. 3595004 일본 등록특허 제3631466호Japanese Patent No. 3631466

본 발명은 낭균병과 붉은갯병을 동시에 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김의 병해를 방지하면서 김의 생장을 촉진하고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있는 김의 난균성 갯병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 한다. The present invention provides an active treatment agent composition for controlling laver oomycete disease, which can effectively control cystic bacillus and red seaweed at the same time, thereby promoting the growth of laver and improving the quality of harvested laver while preventing the disease of laver. aim to

전술한 목적을 달성하기 위한 본 발명은 프로피온산 및 염산의 혼합물을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물에 관한 것이다.The present invention for achieving the above object relates to an active treatment agent composition for controlling Cystic disease, characterized in that it comprises a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.

하기 실시예에서 확인할 수 있듯이 종래 난균성 갯병의 방제에 사용되던 염산은 낭균병의 방제에는 큰 효과를 나타내지 못하며, 유기산의 낭균병에 대한 항균 효과 역시 보고된 바 없었다. 그러나 본 발명의 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합물은 낭균병을 매우 효과적으로 방제할 수 있다.As can be seen in the following examples, hydrochloric acid, which has been conventionally used to control oomycete cyst, does not show a great effect on the control of cystic bacillus, and the antibacterial effect of organic acid on cystic bacillus has not been reported either. However, the mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid of the present invention can very effectively control Cysbacteria.

본 발명의 조성물은 또한 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합에 의해 붉은갯병의 방제에 대한 시너지 효과를 나타내어 낭균 뿐 아니라 붉은갯병의 방제에도 효능이 우수하여 낭균 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물로 사용할 수 있다. 본 발명의 조성물에 의하면 낭균병과 붉은갯병을 동시에 방제할 수 있으므로 실질적인 난균성 갯병의 구제가 가능하다. The composition of the present invention also exhibits a synergistic effect on the control of cysts by mixing propionic acid and hydrochloric acid, and thus has excellent efficacy in controlling cystic bacteria as well as cystic larvae, and can be used as an active treatment composition for simultaneous control of cystic bacteria and cystic larvae. there is. According to the composition of the present invention, since it is possible to simultaneously control Cystic bacillus and red cyst, it is possible to substantially control oomycete cyst.

본 발명의 조성물을 사용하여 붉은갯병에 대한 방제 효과를 더욱 증폭시키기 위해서는 젖산을 추가로 함유하는 것이 더욱 바람직하다. In order to further amplify the control effect against erythrasma using the composition of the present invention, it is more preferable to further contain lactic acid.

김 양식어장 활성처리제 사용기준 중 제4조 활성처리제의 성분 허용함유량에 따르면, 유기산을 주성분으로 하는 활성처리제 중 염소이온, 황산이온, 질산이온의 합계 함량은 8% 이상 9.5% 이하이다. 따라서, 본 발명의 조성물 중 염산의 중량비는 8%~9.5%인 것이 바람직하지만, 상기 범위를 배제하는 것은 아니다. 실시예에서도 확인할 수 있듯이 상기 범위보다 낮은 농도인 5 중량%의 HCl을 함유한는 경우에도 우수한 방제효과를 나타내었으며, 상기 범위를 벗어난다고 해서 방제 효능이 감소하는 것은 아니다. 본 발명의 조성물 중 염산은 조성물의 시너지 효과를 나게 하는 주요한 성분 중의 하나로, 염산 그 자체로는 해당 농도에서 난균성 갯병의 방제효과를 나타내지 않으나 프로피온산과의 혼합 시 방제 효과를 현저하게 상승시키는 효과가 있으며, 젖산과의 혼합 시 붉은갯병에 대한 방제 효과에 시너지 효과를 나타내었다. According to the permissible component content of the active treatment agent in Article 4 of the active treatment agent usage standards for seaweed farms, the total content of chlorine ions, sulfate ions, and nitrate ions in the active treatment agent containing organic acids as the main component is 8% or more and 9.5% or less. Accordingly, the weight ratio of hydrochloric acid in the composition of the present invention is preferably 8% to 9.5%, but the above range is not excluded. As can be seen in the Examples, even when containing 5 wt% of HCl, which is a concentration lower than the above range, an excellent control effect was exhibited, and the control efficacy is not reduced just because it is out of the above range. Hydrochloric acid in the composition of the present invention is one of the main components that produce a synergistic effect of the composition, and hydrochloric acid itself does not show the control effect of oomycete cyanobacteria at the corresponding concentration, but when mixed with propionic acid, the effect of remarkably increasing the control effect In addition, when mixed with lactic acid, it showed a synergistic effect on the control effect on red seaweed.

본 발명의 조성물 중 프로피온산의 농도는 0.5~10 중량%인 것이 바람직하다. 또한, 젖산이 추가로 함유된 조성물에서 젖산과 프로피온산의 중량비는 1:9~9:1인 것이 바람직하며, 낭균병과 붉은갯병에 대한 방제 효과가 유사하게 나타나는 7:3~5:5인 것이 더욱 바람직하다. 그러나 낭균병과 붉은갯병의 발생 양상에 따라 상기 비율은 적절하게 조정될 수 있다. 즉, 젖산의 비율이 증가할수록 붉은갯병의 방제에 유리하고, 프로피온산의 비율이 증가할수록 낭균병의 방제에 유리하기 때문에 난균성 갯병 중 붉은갯병과 낭균병의 발생빈도를 고려하여 상기 비율 내 젖산과 프로피온산의 중량비는 적절하게 조절될 수 있다. The concentration of propionic acid in the composition of the present invention is preferably 0.5 to 10% by weight. In addition, in the composition containing additional lactic acid, the weight ratio of lactic acid and propionic acid is preferably 1:9 to 9:1, and more preferably 7:3 to 5:5, which shows similar control effects against Cystic bacillus and cysticercosis. desirable. However, the ratio can be appropriately adjusted according to the occurrence pattern of Cystic bacillus and Rhododendron blight. That is, as the ratio of lactic acid increases, it is advantageous for the control of cystic bacilli, and as the ratio of propionic acid increases, it is advantageous for the control of cystic. The weight ratio of propionic acid may be appropriately adjusted.

본 발명의 활성처리제 조성물은 해수로 희석하여 김을 5초~1분간 처리하는 것에 의해 난균성 갯병을 방제할 수 있다. 희석배율은 10~100배(v/v)일 수 있으나, 이에 한정되는 것은 아니며 난균성 갯병의 종류나 발생빈도에 따라 적절하게 조절할 수 있다.The active treatment composition of the present invention can control oomycete cysts by diluting seawater and treating seaweed for 5 seconds to 1 minute. The dilution ratio may be 10 to 100 times (v/v), but is not limited thereto, and may be appropriately adjusted according to the type or frequency of occurrence of oomycete cyst.

이상과 같이 본 발명의 김의 난균성 갯병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물에 의하면 붉은갯병 뿐 아니라 종래 효과적인 활성처리제가 없었던 낭균병에 대해 동시에 방제 효과를 나타내고, 낮은 농도에서도 붉은갯병과 낭균병 모두를 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김 양식장의 피해를 막고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있다. As described above, according to the active treatment composition for controlling seaweed oomycete of the present invention, it exhibits a control effect not only on red seaweed but also on cystic bacillus, which has not been an effective active treatment agent in the prior art, and effectively treats both cystic bacilli and cystic bacillus at low concentrations. It can prevent damage to laver farms and improve the quality of harvested laver.

도 1은 방사무늬김의 현미경 사진 및 배양 사진.
도 2는 붉은갯병균 및 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체의 현미경 사진.
도 3은 프로피온산과 젖산의 처리 농도에 따른 붉은갯병의 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 4는 프로피온산 또는 젖산과 염산 혼합용액의 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 5는 프로피온산 또는 젖산과 염산 혼합용액의 희석배율에 따른 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 6은 9.5% 염산 수용액의 희석배율에 따른 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 7은 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 8은 9.5% 염산 수용액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 9는 프로피온산과 염산 혼합용액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 10은 젖산과 염산 혼합용액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 11은 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 12는 프로피온산과 젖산의 혼합비율에 따른 붉은갯병과 낭균병의 방제 효과를 보여주는 그래프.
1 is a photomicrograph and cultured photo of radioactive laver.
Figure 2 is a microscopic photograph of the seaweed thallus infected with rhododendron bacillus and cysticercosis.
Figure 3 is a graph showing the anti-infection efficacy of red seaweed according to the treatment concentration of propionic acid and lactic acid.
Figure 4 is a graph showing the anti-infection efficacy of propionic acid or a mixed solution of lactic acid and hydrochloric acid against red seaweed.
5 is a graph showing the anti-infection efficacy for red seaweed according to the dilution ratio of propionic acid or a mixed solution of lactic acid and hydrochloric acid.
6 is a graph showing the efficacy of inhibiting infection against red seaweed according to the dilution ratio of a 9.5% aqueous hydrochloric acid solution.
7 is a graph showing the anti-infection efficacy against red seaweed according to the dilution ratio of the mixed solution of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
8 is a graph showing the efficacy of inhibiting infection against Cystic bacillus according to the dilution ratio of a 9.5% aqueous hydrochloric acid solution.
9 is a graph showing the anti-infection efficacy against Cystic bacillus according to the dilution ratio of a mixed solution of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Figure 10 is a graph showing the efficacy of inhibiting infection against Cystic bacillus according to the dilution ratio of the mixed solution of lactic acid and hydrochloric acid.
11 is a graph showing the anti-infection efficacy against Cystic bacillus according to the dilution ratio of the mixed solution of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
12 is a graph showing the control effect of red cyst and cysticercosis according to the mixing ratio of propionic acid and lactic acid.

이하 첨부된 실시예를 들어 본 발명을 보다 상세히 설명한다. 그러나 이러한 실시예는 본 발명의 기술적 사상의 내용과 범위를 쉽게 설명하기 위한 예시일 뿐, 이에 의해 본 발명의 기술적 범위가 한정되거나 변경되는 것은 아니다. 이러한 예시에 기초하여 본 발명의 기술적 사상의 범위 안에서 다양한 변형과 변경이 가능함은 당업자에게는 당연할 것이다. Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying examples. However, these embodiments are merely examples for easily explaining the content and scope of the technical idea of the present invention, and thereby the technical scope of the present invention is not limited or changed. It will be natural for those skilled in the art that various modifications and changes can be made within the scope of the technical spirit of the present invention based on these examples.

[실시예][Example]

김 및 균주의 배양Cultivation of seaweed and strains

1) 방사무늬김(Pyropia yezonesis)1) Radial laver ( Pyropia yezonesis )

방사무늬김은 목포 해조류 바이오연구센터에서 분양받아 PES(Provasoli Enriched Seawater) 배지에서 단독 배양하였다. 여과지(Whatman No. 2)로 여과한 해수를 고압증기멸균기로 121℃, 1.2기압의 조건에서 20분간 멸균하여 사용하였다. 배양조건은 10℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, 백색광(>50 μmol/m2·s1)을 사용하였으며 통기배양 하였다. 배양 배지는 7일 주기로 교체하였다.Radial laver was purchased from the Mokpo Seaweed Bio Research Center and cultured alone in PES (Provasoli Enriched Seawater) medium. Seawater filtered with filter paper (Whatman No. 2) was sterilized for 20 minutes at 121°C and 1.2 atm using an autoclave. Culture conditions were 10°C, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, white light (>50 μmol/m 2 ·s 1 ), and aeration was performed. The culture medium was changed every 7 days.

도 1의 A는 방사무늬김의 현미경 이미지(scale bar : 20㎛)이며, B는 PES 배지에서 방사무늬김의 엽체를 배양하는 사진이다.1A is a microscopic image (scale bar: 20 μm) of radiograss, and B is a photograph of culturing the thallus of radiopatterned laver in PES medium.

2) 붉은 갯병균(Pythium porphyrae)2) Red Pythium porphyrae

붉은갯병균은 진도군 회동에서 채집한 붉은갯병에 감염된 김 엽체에서 분리하여 배양하였다. 도 2의 A는 붉은갯병균에 감염된 김 엽체의 현미경 사진이다. 도 1에서의 정상 세포와는 달리 도 2의 A에서는 균사가 실처럼 김 세포를 뚫고 지나가는 흔적을 볼 수 있으며, 뚫린 세포들은 정상 김 세포보다 김 세포가 수축하며 빨간색을 나타낸다. 채집된 김의 감염 부위를 잘라 cornmeal agar 배지에서 분리 될 때까지 계대배양하였다. 분리된 균주는 cornmeal agar 배지에서 21일의 주기로 20℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle에서 계대 배양하였다. 실험에 사용할 시에는 계대배양 조건과 같은 빛, 온도로 Arasaki B 배지에서 7~10일간 현탁배양 하여 분리된 균사를 사용하였다.The rhododendron bacillus was isolated and cultured from the laver fronds infected with rhododendron collected in Hoe-dong, Jindo-gun. FIG. 2A is a microscopic photograph of a seaweed frond infected with rhododendron bacillus. Unlike normal cells in FIG. 1 , in FIG. 2A , traces of hyphae passing through laver cells like threads can be seen, and the perforated cells show red color due to contraction of laver cells than normal laver cells. Infected parts of collected seaweed were cut and subcultured until separated from cornmeal agar medium. The isolated strain was subcultured in cornmeal agar medium at 20° C., 12:12 hr L:D cycle with a cycle of 21 days. When used in the experiment, the mycelium isolated by suspension culture in Arasaki B medium for 7 to 10 days under the same light and temperature as the subculture conditions was used.

3) 낭균(Olpidiopsis pyropiae)3) Cyst ( Olpidiopsis pyropiae )

낭균은 진도군 회동에서 채집한 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체를 방사무늬김으로 병균을 전이시켜 분리 배양하였다. 도 2의 B는 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체의 현미경 사진으로, 낭균병 감염에 의해 김 세포가 노랗게 변한 것을 보여준다. 배양조건은 15℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, 백색광(>50 μmol/m2·s1)을 사용하였으며 5~7일 주기로 새로운 방사무늬김을 넣어 주어 낭균을 유지하였다.Cystic bacteria were isolated and cultured by transferring the bacteria to the laver fronds infected with cystic bacilli collected in Hoe-dong, Jindo-gun. B of FIG. 2 is a micrograph of laver fronds infected with Cystic bacteria, showing that the seaweed cells have turned yellow due to Cystic bacteria infection. The culture conditions were 15° C., 12:12 hr L:D cycle, white light (>50 μmol/m 2 ·s 1 ), and new radiopatterns were added every 5 to 7 days to maintain Cyst bacteria.

낭균의 감염 유도 및 감염률의 측정Induction of cyst infection and measurement of infection rate

1) 붉은갯병 1) Red seaweed

Arasaki B 배지에서 7~10일간 현탁배양한 균사 형태의 붉은갯병균을 멸균된 해수에 24~30hr 동안 노출시켜 유주자의 방출을 유도하였다. 방출된 유주자의 세포수는 3.7%의 formaldehyde를 1/500로 희석한 고정액에 고정시킨 후 hemocytometer를 이용하여 측정하였다. 2.5×103 cell/ml의 유주자를 방사무늬김과 함께 멸균된 해수에서 배양하여 감염시켰다. 감염의 관찰 및 촬영은 광학현미경(OLYMPUS, BX50)과 cellSens program을 이용하였다. 감염률 측정은 image program인 Adobe Photoshop을 이용하여 촬영된 사진의 전체 면적 대비 감염면적을 비교하여 측정하였다.The release of spores was induced by exposing the mycelium-type red sea bacillus suspended in Arasaki B medium for 7 to 10 days to sterilized seawater for 24 to 30 hr. The number of released resident cells was measured using a hemocytometer after fixing 3.7% formaldehyde in a fixative diluted 1/500. 2.5×10 3 cell/ml zoospores were cultured in sterilized seawater together with radiopatterns to infect them. Infection was observed and photographed using an optical microscope (OLYMPUS, BX50) and cellSens program. The infection rate was measured by comparing the infected area to the total area of the photograph taken using Adobe Photoshop, an image program.

이하 실시예에서, 처리액의 종류 및 희석배율에 따른 감염률, 감염세포 수의 통계적 차이는 one-way ANOVA를 통해 확인하였다. 사후검정(Post-hoc test)을 통해 각각의 처리액의 종류 및 희석배율에 따른 차이를 확인하였다.In the following examples, the statistical difference in the infection rate and the number of infected cells according to the type of treatment solution and the dilution factor was confirmed through one-way ANOVA. The difference according to the type and dilution ratio of each treatment solution was confirmed through post-hoc test.

2) 낭균병2) Cystobacteria

낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체에서 유주자를 방출시킨 후, 유주자가 포함된 감염수를 40 μm 필터로 여과하여 방사무늬김을 감염시켰다. 감염의 관찰 및 촬영은 붉은갯병과 동일한 방법으로 진행하였다. After releasing the spores from the laver fronds infected with Cystic bacillus, the infected water containing the spores was filtered through a 40 μm filter to infect radiopatterns. Observation and imaging of infection was carried out in the same manner as that of the rhododendron disease.

붉은갯병에 대한 활성처리제 효능 검정Efficacy test of the active treatment agent against red seaweed

1) 프로피온산과 젖산 처리 농도에 따른 감염 분석1) Infection analysis according to the concentration of propionic acid and lactic acid treatment

붉은갯병 감염 저해 효과가 우수한 프로피온산과 젖산의 최소 효과 농도를 분석하기 위하여 농도별(0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 wt%) 시료를 준비한 후 붉은갯병에 감염된 엽체에 15초간 처리하였다. 처리 직후 엽체를 멸균 해수에 세척하고 3일간 배양하여 대조구의 감염이 80%이상 진행된 것을 확인한 후 처리구의 갯병 감염률을 비교 측정하였다. In order to analyze the minimum effective concentrations of propionic acid and lactic acid, which have excellent inhibitory effects on rhododendron infection, samples for each concentration (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 wt%) were prepared and then treated on the leaflets infected with rhododendron for 15 seconds. Immediately after the treatment, the fronds were washed in sterile seawater and cultured for 3 days to confirm that the infection of the control group had progressed to 80% or more, and then the infection rate of the treatment group was compared and measured.

도 3은 그 결과를 도시한 것으로, 프로피온산(PPA)은 0.25% 처리 시까지는 대조군의 감염률과 유의미한 차이가 없었으며, 0.5% 처리구의 감염률(52.7%)은 대조군의 감염률(90.9%)보다 낮았고, 1% 처리구에서 가장 낮은 감염률(5.63%)을 보였다. 또한, 도 3에서 젖산(LA)은 프로피온산에 비해 낮은 농도에서 효과를 나타냄을 확인할 수 있다. 0.1% 처리구의 감염률 84.5%는 0.25% 처리구의 감염률 4.0%와 0.5% 처리구의 감염률 4.2% 및 1% 처리구의 감염률 3.9%보다 높았으나, 대조구의 감염률 90.9%보다는 유의하게 낮았다.3 shows the results, propionic acid (PPA) was not significantly different from the infection rate of the control group until 0.25% treatment, the infection rate of the 0.5% treatment group (52.7%) was lower than the infection rate of the control group (90.9%), The 1% treatment group showed the lowest infection rate (5.63%). In addition, in FIG. 3 , it can be seen that lactic acid (LA) exhibits an effect at a lower concentration than propionic acid. The infection rate of 84.5% in the 0.1% treatment group was higher than the infection rate of 4.0% in the 0.25% treatment group, 4.2% in the 0.5% treatment group, and 3.9% in the 1% treatment group, but it was significantly lower than the infection rate of 90.9% in the control group.

프로피온산의 pH는 1% 용액에서 2.99, 0,1% 용액에서 3.83이었으며, 젖산의 pH는 1% 용액에서 2.24, 0.1% 용액에서 3.02로 젖산이 프로피온산에 비해 산성이 강하였다. The pH of propionic acid was 2.99 in 1% solution and 3.83 in 0.1% solution, and the pH of lactic acid was 2.24 in 1% solution and 3.02 in 0.1% solution. Lactic acid was stronger than propionic acid.

2) 유기산과 염산 혼합액의 처리에 따른 감염 분석2) Infection analysis according to the treatment of organic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture

김 양식어장 활성처리제 사용기준에 따르면 유기산을 주성분으로 하는 활성처리제에서 각 성분의 허용함유량은, 유기산은 10% 이상, 염소이온, 황산이온, 질산이온의 합계 함량은 8%이상 9.5%이하, 황산이온, 질산이온은 각각 2%이하이다.According to the standards for use of the active treatment agent for seaweed farms, the allowable content of each component in the active treatment agent containing organic acids as the main component is 10% or more for organic acids, and the total content of chlorine ions, sulfate ions and nitrate ions is 8% or more and 9.5% or less, sulfuric acid ions and nitrate ions are each less than 2%.

이에 프로피온산(10 w%) + 염산(9 w% 또는 5 w%), 젖산(10 w%) + 염산(9 w% 또는 5 w%)의 조성을 갖는 활성처리제를 제조하였다. 활성처리제를 1/30로 멸균된 해수를 이용하여 희석한 후, 붉은갯병에 감염된 엽체에 15초간 처리한 다음 즉시 멸균 해수에 세척하였다. 이후 3일간 배양하여 대조구의 감염이 80% 이상 진행되었을 때 처리구의 감염률을 비교 측정하였다. Accordingly, an active treatment agent having a composition of propionic acid (10 w%) + hydrochloric acid (9 w% or 5 w%), lactic acid (10 w%) + hydrochloric acid (9 w% or 5 w%) was prepared. After the active agent was diluted 1/30 with sterilized seawater, it was treated for 15 seconds on the thallus infected with rhododendron, and then immediately washed with sterile seawater. After culturing for 3 days, the infection rate of the treated group was compared and measured when the infection of the control group progressed more than 80%.

대조군의 감염률은 83.7%였으며, 10% 프로피온산 처리구의 감염률 61.9%나 5% 염산 처리구의 감염률 69.2%, 9.5% 염산 처리구의 감염률 65.3%에 비해 10% 프로피온산과 5% 염산 또는 9.5% 염산 혼합물 처리구의 감염률은 각각 3.4%와 3.0%로 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합물 처리 시 효과가 매우 현저하였다.The infection rate of the control group was 83.7%, compared with the infection rate of 61.9% in the 10% propionic acid treatment group, 69.2% in the 5% hydrochloric acid treatment group, and 65.3% in the 9.5% hydrochloric acid treatment group, the 10% propionic acid and 5% hydrochloric acid or 9.5% hydrochloric acid mixture treatment group Infection rates were 3.4% and 3.0%, respectively, and the effect was very remarkable when treated with a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.

반면, 10% 젖산 처리구의 감염률은 1.9%로 이미 매우 낮았기 때문에 추가로 5% 염산 또는 9.5% 염산을 혼합한 경우에도 젖산만 처리한 것에 비해 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. On the other hand, since the infection rate of the 10% lactic acid treatment group was already very low at 1.9%, even when additional 5% hydrochloric acid or 9.5% hydrochloric acid was mixed, there was no significant difference compared to that treated with lactic acid alone.

3) 유기산과 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 감염 분석3) Analysis of infection according to dilution ratio of organic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture

유기산과 염산 혼합액을 희석하여 처리한 것을 제외하고는 2)와 동일한 방법에 의해 감염을 분석하였다.Infection was analyzed in the same manner as in 2) except that the organic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture was diluted and treated.

10% 프로피온산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액은 희석배율이 증가할수록 감염률이 증가하였으며, 80배 희석액의 감염률은 대조군과 유사하였다. 참고로 9.5% 염산만을 희석하여 처리한 경우에는 대조군과 감염률에서 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(도 6 참조). 프로피온산의 50배 희석 처리구의 감염률은 21.3%로 대조군의 감염률 86.1%의 25% 수준으로 크게 감소하였다. 상기 용액 중 프로피온산의 농도는 0.2%로 해당 농도의 프로피온산 용액(도 3)이나, 염산 용액(도 6) 단독으로는 붉은갯병 방제효과를 나타내지 않아 혼합용액의 시너지 효과가 있음을 시사하였다.The infection rate of the 10% propionic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid mixture increased as the dilution ratio increased, and the infection rate of the 80-fold dilution solution was similar to that of the control group. For reference, when only 9.5% hydrochloric acid was diluted and treated, there was no significant difference in infection rate with the control group (see FIG. 6 ). The infection rate of the 50-fold dilution treatment group of propionic acid was 21.3%, which was significantly reduced to 25% of the infection rate of 86.1% of the control group. The concentration of propionic acid in the solution was 0.2%, suggesting that there is a synergistic effect of the mixed solution because the propionic acid solution (FIG. 3) or the hydrochloric acid solution (FIG. 6) alone at the corresponding concentration did not show the effect of controlling erythrasma.

10% 젖산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액은 희석배율이 증가할수록 감염률이 증가하는 경향을 보여주었으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 50배, 60배, 80배 희석액의 감염률은 각각 3.3, 4.2, 5.2%로 대조군의 감염률 86.1%에 대해 약 3.8~6.0% 수준이었다. 젖산은 그 자체로 감염 억제 효과가 매우 크기 때문에 프로피온산에 비해서는 염산과의 혼합에 의한 시너지 효과가 약했지만, 역시 도 3과 도 6을 참조하여 농도를 환산해 보았을 때 혼합에 의한 시너지 효과를 나타내는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.The 10% lactic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid mixture showed a tendency to increase the infection rate as the dilution ratio increased, but there was no significant difference. The infection rates of the 50-fold, 60-fold, and 80-fold dilutions were 3.3, 4.2, and 5.2%, respectively, which was about 3.8 to 6.0% compared to the infection rate of 86.1% in the control group. Since lactic acid itself has a very large infection inhibitory effect, the synergistic effect by mixing with hydrochloric acid was weak compared to propionic acid, but again, when converting the concentration with reference to FIGS. 3 and 6, the synergistic effect of mixing is shown could confirm that

4) 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액 처리에 따른 감염 분석4) Analysis of infection by treatment with lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture

젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산을 하기 표 1의 농도가 되도록 혼합하여 활성저해제를 제조한 후 희석액을 처리한 것을 제외하고는 2)와 동일한 방법에 의해 붉은갯병 감염 저해 정도를 평가하였다. 그 결과는 표 1과 도 7에 도시하였다. 도 7에서 A, B, C는 각각 하기 표 1의 1, 2, 3의 실험군을 나타낸다.Lactic acid, propionic acid, and hydrochloric acid were mixed so as to have the concentrations shown in Table 1 below to prepare an activity inhibitor, and then the degree of inhibition of erythrasma infection was evaluated in the same manner as in 2) except that the diluent was treated. The results are shown in Table 1 and FIG. 7 . 7, A, B, and C represent the experimental groups 1, 2, and 3 of Table 1, respectively.

Figure pat00001
Figure pat00001

9.5% 염산과 표 1의 조성물의 희석비율에 따른 용액의 pH를 유리전극(Hemilton, Liq-Glass BNC) 이 부착된 pH meter (NeoMet, pH/ISE Meter pH-250L) 로 측정하고 그 결과를 표 2에 기재하였다.The pH of the solution according to the dilution ratio of 9.5% hydrochloric acid and the composition in Table 1 was measured with a pH meter (NeoMet, pH/ISE Meter pH-250L) with a glass electrode (Hemilton, Liq-Glass BNC) attached, and the results are shown in the table. 2 is described.

Figure pat00002
Figure pat00002

낭균병에 대한 활성처리제 효능 검정Efficacy test of active treatment agent against Cystic disease

1) 유기산과 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 감염 분석1) Analysis of infection according to dilution ratio of organic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture

붉은갯병과 동일한 방법에 의해 유기산과 염산 혼합액을 희석하여 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체에 처리하고, 감염 세포의 수를 관측하였다.In the same manner as for cystic larvae, the mixed solution of organic acid and hydrochloric acid was diluted and treated on laver fronds infected with Cystic bacillus, and the number of infected cells was observed.

먼저 도 8은 9.5% 염산의 희석배율에 따른 낭균의 감염률을 나타낸 그래프로 9.5% 염산 희석액의 처리에 따라 감염률은 대략 20% 정도가 감소하였으나, 유의적이지는 않았다. First, FIG. 8 is a graph showing the infection rate of Cystobacteria according to the dilution factor of 9.5% hydrochloric acid. The infection rate decreased by about 20% according to the treatment with the 9.5% hydrochloric acid dilution, but it was not significant.

도 9는 10% 프로피온산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액의 희석액 처리에 따른 낭균 감염률을 도시한 그래프이다. 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합액 30, 40, 50배 희석처리구의 감염 세포 수는 대조군의 감염 세포 수(98.6개) 보다 적었다. 30배 희석 처리구의 감염 세포 수(6.6개)와 40배 희석 처리구의 감염 세포 수(10.5개)는 유의미한 차이가 없었으며, 50배 희석 처리구의 감염 세포 수(30.2개) 보다 적었다. 9 is a graph showing the rate of infection with Cystobacteria according to the dilution treatment of a mixture of 10% propionic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid. The number of infected cells in the group treated with a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid diluted 30, 40, and 50 times was lower than the number of infected cells in the control group (98.6 cells). There was no significant difference between the number of infected cells in the 30-fold dilution treatment group (6.6) and the number of infected cells in the 40-fold dilution treatment group (10.5 cells), which was less than the number of infected cells in the 50-fold dilution treatment group (30.2 cells).

10% 젖산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액은 희석배율이 증가할수록 감염률이 증가하는 경향을 보여주었다. 30배, 40배, 50배 희석액 처리 시의 감염 세포 수는 각각 60.6개, 73.8개, 89.8개로 대조군의 감염 세포 수 98.6개에 비해 61~91% 수준이었다. 50배 희석처리 시의 감염 세포 수는 대조군과 유의한 차이는 없었다. 붉은갯병에 대해서는 젖산이 함유된 희석액이 강력한 효과를 나타내었으나, 낭균에 대해서는 젖산의 희석액이 프로피온산에 비해 효과가 낮았다.The 10% lactic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid mixture showed a tendency to increase the infection rate as the dilution ratio increased. The number of infected cells when treated with 30-fold, 40-fold, and 50-fold dilutions was 60.6, 73.8, and 89.8, respectively, which was 61 to 91% of the number of infected cells in the control group, 98.6. The number of infected cells in the 50-fold dilution treatment was not significantly different from the control group. The diluent containing lactic acid showed a strong effect against red seaweed, but the dilution of lactic acid had a lower effect than propionic acid against Cystic bacteria.

2) 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액 처리에 따른 감염 분석2) Analysis of infection by treatment with lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture

젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산을 하기 표 3의 농도가 되도록 혼합하여 활성저해제를 제조한 후 희석액을 처리한 것을 제외하고는 1)와 동일한 방법에 의해 낭균병 감염 저해 정도를 평가하였다. 그 결과는 표 3과 도 11에 도시하였다.The degree of inhibition of Cystic bacillus infection was evaluated in the same manner as in 1), except that lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid were mixed to the concentrations shown in Table 3 below to prepare an inhibitor, and then the diluent was treated. The results are shown in Table 3 and FIG. 11 .

Figure pat00003
Figure pat00003

난균성 갯병 방제용 조성물의 농도에 따른 붉은갯병과 낭균병의 방제 효과 확인Confirmation of the control effect of red cyst and cystic bacteria according to the concentration of the composition for controlling oomycete cysticercosis

붉은갯병과 낭균병의 동시 방제를 위한 조성물의 최적 조성을 확인하기 위하여, 9.5% 염산 및 젖산과 프로피온산의 혼합물을 젖산과 프로피온산의 비율을 변화시키며 방제 효과를 비교하였다.In order to confirm the optimal composition of the composition for the simultaneous control of rhododendron and Cystic disease, the control effect was compared with 9.5% hydrochloric acid and a mixture of lactic acid and propionic acid by changing the ratio of lactic acid and propionic acid.

도 12는 30배 희석액을 사용한 처리 결과를 보여주는 그래프로, LA는 젖산을 CP는 프로피온산을 나타낸다. 도 12로부터 프로피온산과 젖산의 중량비가 7:5~3:5인 경우 붉은갯병과 낭균병을 동시에 우수한 효율로 방제할 수 있음을 보여준다. 12 is a graph showing the treatment results using a 30-fold dilution, LA is lactic acid and CP is propionic acid. From FIG. 12, it is shown that when the weight ratio of propionic acid and lactic acid is 7:5 to 3:5, it is possible to simultaneously control red seaweed and Cystobacteria with excellent efficiency.

Claims (9)

프로피온산 및 염산의 혼합물을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
An active agent composition for controlling Cystic disease, characterized in that it comprises a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
프로피온산 및 염산의 혼합물을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
Active treatment composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and cysticercosis, characterized in that it comprises a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
청구항 2에 있어서,
젖산을 추가로 함유하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
3. The method according to claim 2,
Active treatment composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and cysticercosis, characterized in that it further contains lactic acid.
청구항 2 또는 청구항 3에 있어서,
조성물 중 염산의 농도는 8~9.5 중량%인 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
4. The method according to claim 2 or 3,
The concentration of hydrochloric acid in the composition is 8 to 9.5% by weight of the active treatment agent composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and red cyst.
청구항 2 또는 청구항 3에 있어서,
조성물 중 프로피온산의 농도는 0.5~10 중량%인 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
4. The method according to claim 2 or 3,
The concentration of propionic acid in the composition is 0.5 to 10% by weight of the active treatment agent composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and erythrasma.
청구항 3에 있어서,
상기 조성물 중 젖산과 프로피온산의 중량비는 1:9~9:1인 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
4. The method according to claim 3,
The active treatment composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and red cyst, characterized in that the weight ratio of lactic acid and propionic acid in the composition is 1:9 to 9:1.
청구항 6에 있어서,
상기 조성물에서 붉은갯병에 비해 낭균병이 심할수록 조성물 중 프로피온산의 함량을 높게 조절하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
7. The method of claim 6,
The active treatment composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and cystic bacillus, characterized in that the higher the content of propionic acid in the composition, the more severe the cystic bacillus compared to cystic bacillus in the composition.
청구항 2 또는 청구항 3에 있어서,
상기 활성처리제 조성물을 해수로 희석하여 5초~1분간 처리하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
4. The method according to claim 2 or 3,
The active treatment composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and erythrasma, characterized in that the active treatment composition is diluted with seawater and treated for 5 seconds to 1 minute.
청구항 8에 있어서,
상기 희석배율은 10~100배(v/v)인 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
9. The method of claim 8,
The dilution ratio is 10 to 100 times (v / v), characterized in that the active treatment agent composition for the simultaneous control of Cystic bacillus and red cyst.
KR1020210006201A 2020-01-29 2021-01-15 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease KR102549525B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020230081221A KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020200010527 2020-01-29
KR20200010527 2020-01-29

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020230081221A Division KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20210097024A true KR20210097024A (en) 2021-08-06
KR102549525B1 KR102549525B1 (en) 2023-06-30

Family

ID=77315314

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020210006201A KR102549525B1 (en) 2020-01-29 2021-01-15 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease
KR1020230081221A KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020230081221A KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (2) KR102549525B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102612026B1 (en) 2022-10-14 2023-12-08 공주대학교 산학협력단 Disease-Resistant P. tenera Variants

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS595004B2 (en) 1978-03-15 1984-02-02 東洋紡績株式会社 Hollow fiber membrane separation equipment
JPS631466B2 (en) 1976-06-04 1988-01-12 Linde Ag
KR20000060843A (en) 1999-03-19 2000-10-16 곽효섭 organic acid treatment for laver cultivation
JP3631466B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-03-23 扶桑化学工業株式会社 Cultured laver treatment agent, cultured laver treatment solution, and cultured laver treatment method
KR20060061253A (en) * 2004-12-01 2006-06-07 다이이치 세이모 가부시키가이샤 Laver treating method and agent for exterminating seaweeds and preventing diseases of laver
KR100856757B1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2008-09-05 (주)대성케미칼 Acidic agent for use in a laver farm
KR101752610B1 (en) 2016-12-08 2017-06-29 명지테크 주식회사 Active treatment agent for laver farming
KR20200000147A (en) * 2018-06-22 2020-01-02 한국산업기술대학교산학협력단 Laser cleaning apparatus

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS631466B2 (en) 1976-06-04 1988-01-12 Linde Ag
JPS595004B2 (en) 1978-03-15 1984-02-02 東洋紡績株式会社 Hollow fiber membrane separation equipment
KR20000060843A (en) 1999-03-19 2000-10-16 곽효섭 organic acid treatment for laver cultivation
JP3631466B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-03-23 扶桑化学工業株式会社 Cultured laver treatment agent, cultured laver treatment solution, and cultured laver treatment method
KR20060061253A (en) * 2004-12-01 2006-06-07 다이이치 세이모 가부시키가이샤 Laver treating method and agent for exterminating seaweeds and preventing diseases of laver
KR100856757B1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2008-09-05 (주)대성케미칼 Acidic agent for use in a laver farm
KR101752610B1 (en) 2016-12-08 2017-06-29 명지테크 주식회사 Active treatment agent for laver farming
KR20200000147A (en) * 2018-06-22 2020-01-02 한국산업기술대학교산학협력단 Laser cleaning apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
22nd International Seaweed Symposium. 2016.06.19-24* *
현대해양. 박종면 기자. 2019.01.07 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102612026B1 (en) 2022-10-14 2023-12-08 공주대학교 산학협력단 Disease-Resistant P. tenera Variants

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR102549525B1 (en) 2023-06-30
KR20230098121A (en) 2023-07-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Granéli et al. Increase in the production of allelopathic substances by Prymnesium parvum cells grown under N-or P-deficient conditions
Fukami et al. Stimulative and inhibitory effects of bacteria on the growth of microalgae
JP4977011B2 (en) Prevention method for crustacean mold and fish mold using Bacillus subtilis
KR20230098121A (en) Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease
Granke et al. Effects of temperature, concentration, age, and algaecides on Phytophthora capsici zoospore infectivity
HRP20020754A2 (en) Method of controlling zoological and aquatic plant growth
CN105340965A (en) Application of copper-carbon nanocomposite to algae control
Suikkanen et al. Allelopathic effects of Baltic Sea spring bloom dinoflagellates on co-occurring phytoplankton
KR100856757B1 (en) Acidic agent for use in a laver farm
Singhal et al. The effects of argulosis-saprolehniasis on the growth and production of Cyprinus carpoi
Matsuyama et al. Toxic effects of harmful algal blooms on finfish and shellfish
Montasser et al. Effects of some fungi and bacteria as bio-control agents against citrus nematode Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb
KR101957208B1 (en) Pseudoruegeria sp. M32A2M strain having algicidal activity against Alexandrium tamarense and uses thereof
Effiong et al. Sustainable utilization of agricultural straw for harmful algal blooms control: a review
US20050158840A1 (en) Biological process for colour reduction of pulp and paper effluent
KR102489018B1 (en) A Paucibacter sp. strain having algicidal activity against Microcystis aeruginosa and uses thereof
Wang et al. Allelopathic effects of macroalga Corallina pilulifera on the red-tide forming alga Heterosigma akashiwo under laboratory conditions
KR102351383B1 (en) Composition for controlling red tide comprising Fictibacillus sp. or their medium as effective component
Shen et al. Allelopathic effects of Prorocentrum donghaiense and Karenia mikimotoi on each other under different temperature
CN101268764A (en) Method for separating high quality oosperm of asropyle platichthys stellatus pallas
Budzałek et al. Allelopathic effect of Ulva intestinalis L. on the Baltic filamentous cyanobacterium Nostoc sp.
Mohammed Al-Shemmary et al. Response of sorghum to effect of two azo dye bacteria
Abdelaziz et al. Protective role of endophytic fungi and salicylic acid as therapeutic nutrients to improve immune responses of tomato plants against fusarial wilt disease
Stuart et al. Larval rearing advancements for yellowtail amberjack (Seriola lalandi) in southern California
Mustafayeva et al. THE CURRENT STATE OF HYDROBIONTS OF THE AYDAR-ARNASAY SYSTEMS OF LAKES

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
AMND Amendment
E601 Decision to refuse application
AMND Amendment
N231 Notification of change of applicant
X701 Decision to grant (after re-examination)
GRNT Written decision to grant