KR102549525B1 - Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease - Google Patents

Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR102549525B1
KR102549525B1 KR1020210006201A KR20210006201A KR102549525B1 KR 102549525 B1 KR102549525 B1 KR 102549525B1 KR 1020210006201 A KR1020210006201 A KR 1020210006201A KR 20210006201 A KR20210006201 A KR 20210006201A KR 102549525 B1 KR102549525 B1 KR 102549525B1
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
seaweed
acid
disease
hydrochloric acid
infection
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020210006201A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Other versions
KR20210097024A (en
Inventor
김광훈
김로원
이정은
임헌주
Original Assignee
공주대학교 산학협력단
주식회사 케이앤에스
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 공주대학교 산학협력단, 주식회사 케이앤에스 filed Critical 공주대학교 산학협력단
Publication of KR20210097024A publication Critical patent/KR20210097024A/en
Priority to KR1020230081221A priority Critical patent/KR20230098121A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR102549525B1 publication Critical patent/KR102549525B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N37/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids
    • A01N37/02Saturated carboxylic acids or thio analogues thereof; Derivatives thereof
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N29/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing halogenated hydrocarbons
    • A01N29/02Acyclic compounds or compounds containing halogen attached to an aliphatic side-chain of a cycloaliphatic ring system
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01PBIOCIDAL, PEST REPELLANT, PEST ATTRACTANT OR PLANT GROWTH REGULATORY ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR PREPARATIONS
    • A01P3/00Fungicides

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

본 발명은 김 양식장에 가장 큰 피해를 주는 난균성 갯병를 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김의 병해를 방지하면서 김의 생장을 촉진하고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있는 김의 난균성 갯병 방제를 위한 활성처리제에 관한 것으로, 보다 상세하게는 젖산과 프로피온산 및 염산의 혼합물을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병과 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물에 관한 것이다. The present invention can effectively control oomycotic gabybyeong, which causes the greatest damage to seaweed farms, to promote the growth of seaweed while preventing the disease of seaweed, and to control oomycotic seaweed disease of seaweed, which can improve the quality of harvested seaweed. It relates to an active treatment agent, and more particularly, to an active treatment composition for simultaneous control of cystomycosis and red foot disease, characterized in that it contains a mixture of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.

Description

김의 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물{Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease}Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease}

본 발명은 김 양식장에 가장 큰 피해를 주는 낭균병과 붉은갯병을 동시에 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김의 병해를 방지하면서 김의 생장을 촉진하고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있는 김의 낭균병과 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제에 관한 것이다. The present invention can effectively control cysticercosis and cystitis, which cause the greatest damage to laver farms, at the same time, thereby promoting growth of laver and improving the quality of harvested laver while preventing disease of laver. It relates to an active treatment agent for simultaneous control of.

해조류는 전세계적으로 식품 및 식이 보조제, 동물 사료, 화학 물질 및 바이오 연료로 수천 년동안 사용돼 왔다. 특히 아시아에서는 식품으로서의 해조류 활용이 주로 이루어지고 있어 김, 미역, 다시마의 양식 산업이 발전해왔다. 2017년 통계에 따르면, 주 양식종인 김, 미역, 다시마 중에서도 김은 총 생산량의 29.6%, 총 생산금액의 71%를 차지하고 있으며, 수출금액 5억 달러를 달성하여 주요 수출 품목으로 자리잡고 꾸준한 성장세를 보이고 있다.Seaweeds have been used worldwide for thousands of years as food and dietary supplements, animal feed, chemicals and biofuels. Especially in Asia, where seaweeds are mainly used as food, the aquaculture industry of seaweed, seaweed, and kelp has developed. According to statistics in 2017, among the main aquaculture species such as seaweed, seaweed, and kelp, seaweed accounts for 29.6% of total production and 71% of total production value. is showing

우리나라에서 양식되는 김의 종류에는 방사무늬김(Pyropia yezoensis), 잇바디돌김(Pyropia dentata), 모무늬돌김(Pyropia seriata)이 있으며, 특히 양식장에서는 생산성이 높은 품종이 선호됨에 따라 방사무늬김 양식이 꾸준히 증가하는 추세이다. 김의 생산량은 해수, 기후 및 해양 조건 등의 자연적 요인과 김 엽체의 퇴색 및 김발에서의 엽체 유실을 일으키는 갯병에 의해 크게 영향을 받는다. 특히 갯병의 경우 김의 품질을 저하시키거나, 생산량을 감소시켜 어민들에게 큰 피해를 주고 있다. 우리나라에서 발생하는 대표적인 갯병은 낭균병(Olpidiopsis blight), 녹반병(Green-spot disease), 붉은갯병(Red-rot disease)이 있으며, 비교적 수온이 높은 양식 초기인 11~12월과 끝 무렵인 2~3월에 주로 발병한다.Types of seaweed cultivated in Korea include radiation-patterned seaweed ( Pyropia yezoensis ), it-body stone seaweed ( Pyropia dentata ), and hair-patterned seaweed ( Pyropia seriata ). is a growing trend. The production of seaweed is greatly influenced by natural factors such as seawater, climate and marine conditions, and by seaweed disease, which causes the loss of fronds in seaweed fronds and fading of seaweed fronds. In particular, in the case of seaweed bottles, the quality of seaweed is deteriorated or production is reduced, causing great damage to fishermen. The representative dog diseases in Korea are Olpidiopsis blight, Green-spot disease, and Red-rot disease. Occurs mainly in March.

갯병 중에서도 Oomycete강에 속한 붉은갯병균(Pythium porphyrae)과 낭균 (Olpidiopsis spp.)에 의해 발병하는 붉은갯병과 낭균병은 김 양식장에 가장 큰 피해를 주고 있다. 이는 붉은갯병균과 낭균은 김을 직접적으로 감염시키는 유주자를 계속해서 형성, 방출할 수 있는 두 질병균의 생식 및 감염기작 특성과 관련이 깊다. 이로 인해 김 양식장에 두 가지 갯병이 동시에 출현하는 경우 김 양식장에 큰 피해를 주게 되며, 김 양식장에서는 거의 항상 붉은갯병과 낭균병이 함께 발생한다. Among seaweed diseases, cystitis and cystomycosis caused by Pythium porphyrae and Olpidiopsis spp. belonging to the Oomycete River cause the greatest damage to seaweed farms. This is closely related to the characteristics of the reproduction and infection mechanisms of the two disease bacteria, which can continuously form and release zoospores that directly infect seaweed. As a result, if two types of seaweed disease appear at the same time in the seaweed farm, it will cause great damage to the seaweed farm.

우리나라 김 양식장에서는 갯병을 방제하기 위한 방안으로 35% 염산인 무기산을 주로 사용해왔다. 1994년 산처리제의 사용기준을 고시로 제정한 후 무기산의 사용이 제한되면서, 1998년부터 무기산을 대체하기 위해 유기산에 무기산을 혼합한 혼합액을 활성처리제로 개발하여 사용하고 있다. 현재 김 양식장에서 사용할 수 있는 모든 활성처리제는 염산 8.0~9.5%, 유기산 10% 이상을 포함하도록 되어 있다. 현실적으로 유기산은 매우 비싸 실제로 10% 이상을 사용하는 경우는 거의 없으며, 염산이 들어가지 않으면 부착물 찌꺼기 등이 제거되지 않아 어민들이 아예 사용을 하지 않으므로 현실성이 없다. In laver farms in Korea, mineral acid, which is 35% hydrochloric acid, has been mainly used as a measure to control seaweed disease. In 1994, the use of acid treatment agents was enacted as a notification, and the use of inorganic acids was restricted. Since 1998, a mixture of organic acids and inorganic acids has been developed and used as an active treatment agent to replace inorganic acids. Currently, all active treatment agents that can be used in seaweed farms contain 8.0 to 9.5% of hydrochloric acid and 10% or more of organic acid. In reality, organic acids are very expensive, so they rarely use more than 10% in practice, and if hydrochloric acid is not used, deposits and residues are not removed, so fishermen do not use them at all, so it is not realistic.

활성처리제의 주성분으로 들어가는 유기산은 산성을 띠는 유기화합물로 곰팡이, 미생물의 성장을 억제하며 식품의 부패 방지에도 널리 쓰이고 있다. 유기산의 항균 효과 및 작용 범위는 유기산의 종류 및 생화화적 특성에 의해 차이를 보인다. 갯병과 관련된 유기산의 항균효과는 붉은갯병을 일으키는 붉은갯병균에 대해서 젖산, 말산, 구연산, 글루콘산, 타타르산의 효능이 보고된 바 있지만, 낭균병에 대한 유기산의 항균효과는 보고된 바 없다. 또한 기존의 갯병 방제 방안이었던 염산을 처리할 시에도 숙주인 김 세포 내의 낭균은 손상을 주지 않아 방제 효과가 없음이 보고되어 낭균병 방제에 효과적인 활성처리제의 개발이 시급하다. Organic acid, which is the main component of the active treatment agent, is an acidic organic compound that suppresses the growth of mold and microorganisms and is widely used to prevent spoilage of food. The antibacterial effect and range of action of organic acids show differences depending on the type and biochemical characteristics of organic acids. As for the antibacterial effect of organic acids related to dog's disease, the efficacy of lactic acid, malic acid, citric acid, gluconic acid, and tartaric acid has been reported against the bacillus that causes rosacea, but the antibacterial effect of organic acids against cystomycosis has not been reported. In addition, it has been reported that there is no control effect because the host bacillus in the seaweed cells is not damaged even when hydrochloric acid is treated, which was the existing method of controlling ciliary disease.

이에 더하여 김 양식장에서는 낭균병과 붉은갯병이 거의 항상 발병하기 때문에 두 질병을 동시에 잡지 않으면 실질적인 갯병 구제는 이루어지지 않는다. 하나의 질병만을 제어하는 경우에는 도리어 다른 질병이 손쉽게 퍼질 가능성이 높아지게 되는데 두 질병을 모두 잡을 수 있는 처리제가 없어서 그동안 골머리를 앓아 왔다. 어민들은 그저 높은 농도의 염산을 처리하는 것으로만 대응하다 보니 많은 불법행위와 그에 따른 다양한 사회적 문제가 발생하여 왔다. In addition to this, since cystomycosis and red mud disease almost always occur in seaweed farms, substantial dog disease relief is not achieved unless both diseases are simultaneously caught. In the case of controlling only one disease, there is a high possibility that other diseases will spread easily. As fishermen respond only by handling high concentrations of hydrochloric acid, many illegal activities and various social problems have occurred.

또한 염산을 대체하고자 개발된 활성처리제는 염산에 비해 처리 비용이 높고, 처리 시간이 길 뿐만 아니라, 현재까지도 무기산인 염산의 불법 사용이 만연해 사회적으로 문제가 되고 있다. In addition, the active treatment agent developed to replace hydrochloric acid has a higher treatment cost and longer treatment time than hydrochloric acid, and illegal use of hydrochloric acid, an inorganic acid, is still widespread, which has become a social problem.

등록특허 제10-1752610호Registered Patent No. 10-1752610 공개특허 제10-2000-0060843호Patent Publication No. 10-2000-0060843 일본 등록특허 제3595004호Japanese Patent Registration No. 3595004 일본 등록특허 제3631466호Japanese Patent Registration No. 3631466

본 발명은 낭균병과 붉은갯병을 동시에 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김의 병해를 방지하면서 김의 생장을 촉진하고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있는 김의 난균성 갯병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 한다. The present invention can effectively control cystomycosis and red seaweed at the same time, thereby promoting the growth of seaweed and improving the quality of harvested seaweed while preventing diseases of seaweed. aims to

전술한 목적을 달성하기 위한 본 발명은 프로피온산 및 염산의 혼합물을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물에 관한 것이다.The present invention for achieving the above object relates to an active treatment agent composition for controlling cystococci, characterized in that it comprises a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.

하기 실시예에서 확인할 수 있듯이 종래 난균성 갯병의 방제에 사용되던 염산은 낭균병의 방제에는 큰 효과를 나타내지 못하며, 유기산의 낭균병에 대한 항균 효과 역시 보고된 바 없었다. 그러나 본 발명의 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합물은 낭균병을 매우 효과적으로 방제할 수 있다.As can be seen in the following examples, hydrochloric acid, which has been conventionally used for the control of oomycete disease, does not show a significant effect on the control of cystomycosis, and the antibacterial effect of organic acids against cystomycosis has not been reported either. However, the mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid of the present invention can very effectively control cysticercosis.

본 발명의 조성물은 또한 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합에 의해 붉은갯병의 방제에 대한 시너지 효과를 나타내어 낭균 뿐 아니라 붉은갯병의 방제에도 효능이 우수하여 낭균 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물로 사용할 수 있다. 본 발명의 조성물에 의하면 낭균병과 붉은갯병을 동시에 방제할 수 있으므로 실질적인 난균성 갯병의 구제가 가능하다. The composition of the present invention also exhibits a synergistic effect on the control of rosacea by mixing propionic acid and hydrochloric acid, so it is effective in controlling not only cysts but also rosacea. It can be used as an active treatment composition for simultaneous control of cysts and rosacea. there is. According to the composition of the present invention, since it is possible to simultaneously control cysticercosis and rosacea, it is possible to substantially rescue oomycete disease.

본 발명의 조성물을 사용하여 붉은갯병에 대한 방제 효과를 더욱 증폭시키기 위해서는 젖산을 추가로 함유하는 것이 더욱 바람직하다. It is more preferable to further contain lactic acid in order to further amplify the control effect on red mud disease using the composition of the present invention.

김 양식어장 활성처리제 사용기준 중 제4조 활성처리제의 성분 허용함유량에 따르면, 유기산을 주성분으로 하는 활성처리제 중 염소이온, 황산이온, 질산이온의 합계 함량은 8% 이상 9.5% 이하이다. 따라서, 본 발명의 조성물 중 염산의 중량비는 8%~9.5%인 것이 바람직하지만, 상기 범위를 배제하는 것은 아니다. 실시예에서도 확인할 수 있듯이 상기 범위보다 낮은 농도인 5 중량%의 HCl을 함유한는 경우에도 우수한 방제효과를 나타내었으며, 상기 범위를 벗어난다고 해서 방제 효능이 감소하는 것은 아니다. 본 발명의 조성물 중 염산은 조성물의 시너지 효과를 나게 하는 주요한 성분 중의 하나로, 염산 그 자체로는 해당 농도에서 난균성 갯병의 방제효과를 나타내지 않으나 프로피온산과의 혼합 시 방제 효과를 현저하게 상승시키는 효과가 있으며, 젖산과의 혼합 시 붉은갯병에 대한 방제 효과에 시너지 효과를 나타내었다. According to the permissible content of ingredients in the active treatment agent in Article 4 of the standards for use of active treatment agents for seaweed farms, the total content of chloride ions, sulfate ions, and nitrate ions in active agents mainly composed of organic acids is 8% or more and 9.5% or less. Therefore, the weight ratio of hydrochloric acid in the composition of the present invention is preferably 8% to 9.5%, but the above range is not excluded. As can be seen in the examples, even when containing 5% by weight of HCl, which is a concentration lower than the above range, an excellent control effect was exhibited, and the control effect does not decrease when it is out of the above range. Hydrochloric acid in the composition of the present invention is one of the main components that give the synergistic effect of the composition, and hydrochloric acid itself does not show the control effect of oomycetes at the corresponding concentration, but when mixed with propionic acid, the effect of significantly increasing the control effect is When mixed with lactic acid, it showed a synergistic effect on the control effect against red mud disease.

본 발명의 조성물 중 프로피온산의 농도는 0.5~10 중량%인 것이 바람직하다. 또한, 젖산이 추가로 함유된 조성물에서 젖산과 프로피온산의 중량비는 낭균병과 붉은갯병에 대한 방제 효과가 유사하게 나타나는 7:3~5:5인 것이 바람직하다. 그러나 낭균병과 붉은갯병의 발생 양상에 따라 상기 비율은 적절하게 조정될 수 있다. 즉, 젖산의 비율이 증가할수록 붉은갯병의 방제에 유리하고, 프로피온산의 비율이 증가할수록 낭균병의 방제에 유리하기 때문에 난균성 갯병 중 붉은갯병과 낭균병의 발생빈도를 고려하여 상기 비율 내 젖산과 프로피온산의 중량비는 적절하게 조절될 수 있다. The concentration of propionic acid in the composition of the present invention is preferably 0.5 to 10% by weight. In addition, in the composition additionally containing lactic acid, the weight ratio of lactic acid to propionic acid is preferably 7:3 to 5:5, which shows similar control effects against cystomycosis and red foot disease. However, the ratio may be appropriately adjusted according to the occurrence pattern of cystomycosis and red foot disease. In other words, as the ratio of lactic acid increases, it is advantageous to control rosacea, and as the ratio of propionic acid increases, it is advantageous to control cystomycosis. The weight ratio of propionic acid can be adjusted appropriately.

본 발명의 활성처리제 조성물은 해수로 희석하여 김을 5초~1분간 처리하는 것에 의해 난균성 갯병을 방제할 수 있다. 희석배율은 10~100배(v/v)일 수 있으나, 이에 한정되는 것은 아니며 난균성 갯병의 종류나 발생빈도에 따라 적절하게 조절할 수 있다.The active agent composition of the present invention can control oomycete disease by diluting it with seawater and treating seaweed for 5 seconds to 1 minute. The dilution factor may be 10 to 100 times (v/v), but is not limited thereto and may be appropriately adjusted according to the type or frequency of oomycete disease.

이상과 같이 본 발명의 김의 난균성 갯병 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물에 의하면 붉은갯병 뿐 아니라 종래 효과적인 활성처리제가 없었던 낭균병에 대해 동시에 방제 효과를 나타내고, 낮은 농도에서도 붉은갯병과 낭균병 모두를 효과적으로 방제할 수 있어 김 양식장의 피해를 막고 수확된 김의 품질을 향상시킬 수 있다. As described above, according to the active treatment composition for the control of oomycete fungus of laver of the present invention, it exhibits a control effect not only against rosacea but also against cystomycosis, which has not been effective in the past, and effectively treats both erythema and cystomycosis even at low concentrations It can prevent damage to seaweed farms and improve the quality of harvested seaweed.

도 1은 방사무늬김의 현미경 사진 및 배양 사진.
도 2는 붉은갯병균 및 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체의 현미경 사진.
도 3은 프로피온산과 젖산의 처리 농도에 따른 붉은갯병의 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 4는 프로피온산 또는 젖산과 염산 혼합용액의 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 5는 프로피온산 또는 젖산과 염산 혼합용액의 희석배율에 따른 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 6은 9.5% 염산 수용액의 희석배율에 따른 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 7은 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 붉은갯병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 8은 9.5% 염산 수용액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 9는 프로피온산과 염산 혼합용액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 10은 젖산과 염산 혼합용액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 11은 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 낭균병에 대한 감염저해 효능을 보여주는 그래프.
도 12는 프로피온산과 젖산의 혼합비율에 따른 붉은갯병과 낭균병의 방제 효과를 보여주는 그래프.
1 is a photomicrograph and culture photo of radiation patterned seaweed.
Figure 2 is a photomicrograph of seaweed lobes infected with rosacea and cystomycosis.
Figure 3 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy of erysipelas according to the treatment concentration of propionic acid and lactic acid.
Figure 4 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy of propionic acid or a mixed solution of lactic acid and hydrochloric acid against red dog's disease.
Figure 5 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy against red mud disease according to the dilution ratio of propionic acid or a mixed solution of lactic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Figure 6 is a graph showing the infection-inhibiting efficacy against red mantis according to the dilution ratio of 9.5% hydrochloric acid aqueous solution.
Figure 7 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy against red mud disease according to the dilution ratio of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid mixture.
Figure 8 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy against cystic disease according to the dilution ratio of 9.5% hydrochloric acid aqueous solution.
Figure 9 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy against cystic disease according to the dilution ratio of the mixed solution of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Figure 10 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy against cystic disease according to the dilution ratio of the mixed solution of lactic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Figure 11 is a graph showing the infection inhibitory efficacy against cystic disease according to the dilution ratio of a mixture of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Figure 12 is a graph showing the control effect of rosacea and cystic disease according to the mixing ratio of propionic acid and lactic acid.

이하 첨부된 실시예를 들어 본 발명을 보다 상세히 설명한다. 그러나 이러한 실시예는 본 발명의 기술적 사상의 내용과 범위를 쉽게 설명하기 위한 예시일 뿐, 이에 의해 본 발명의 기술적 범위가 한정되거나 변경되는 것은 아니다. 이러한 예시에 기초하여 본 발명의 기술적 사상의 범위 안에서 다양한 변형과 변경이 가능함은 당업자에게는 당연할 것이다. Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the attached examples. However, these embodiments are only examples for easily explaining the content and scope of the technical idea of the present invention, and thereby the technical scope of the present invention is not limited or changed. It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various modifications and changes are possible within the scope of the technical spirit of the present invention based on these examples.

[실시예][Example]

김 및 균주의 배양Cultivation of seaweed and strains

1) 방사무늬김(Pyropia yezonesis)1) Radial seaweed ( Pyropia yezonesis )

방사무늬김은 목포 해조류 바이오연구센터에서 분양받아 PES(Provasoli Enriched Seawater) 배지에서 단독 배양하였다. 여과지(Whatman No. 2)로 여과한 해수를 고압증기멸균기로 121℃, 1.2기압의 조건에서 20분간 멸균하여 사용하였다. 배양조건은 10℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, 백색광(>50 μmol/m2·s1)을 사용하였으며 통기배양 하였다. 배양 배지는 7일 주기로 교체하였다.Radiated seaweed was purchased from the Mokpo Seaweed Bio Research Center and cultured alone in PES (Provaoli Enriched Seawater) medium. Seawater filtered with filter paper (Whatman No. 2) was sterilized with a high-pressure steam sterilizer for 20 minutes under conditions of 121° C. and 1.2 atm. The culture conditions were 10℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, white light (>50 μmol/m 2 ·s 1 ), and aeration was performed. The culture medium was replaced every 7 days.

도 1의 A는 방사무늬김의 현미경 이미지(scale bar : 20㎛)이며, B는 PES 배지에서 방사무늬김의 엽체를 배양하는 사진이다.1A is a microscope image (scale bar: 20 μm) of radiation-patterned seaweed, and B is a photograph of culturing radiation-patterned seaweed halves in a PES medium.

2) 붉은 갯병균(Pythium porphyrae)2) Red sea blight ( Pythium porphyrae )

붉은갯병균은 진도군 회동에서 채집한 붉은갯병에 감염된 김 엽체에서 분리하여 배양하였다. 도 2의 A는 붉은갯병균에 감염된 김 엽체의 현미경 사진이다. 도 1에서의 정상 세포와는 달리 도 2의 A에서는 균사가 실처럼 김 세포를 뚫고 지나가는 흔적을 볼 수 있으며, 뚫린 세포들은 정상 김 세포보다 김 세포가 수축하며 빨간색을 나타낸다. 채집된 김의 감염 부위를 잘라 cornmeal agar 배지에서 분리 될 때까지 계대배양하였다. 분리된 균주는 cornmeal agar 배지에서 21일의 주기로 20℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle에서 계대 배양하였다. 실험에 사용할 시에는 계대배양 조건과 같은 빛, 온도로 Arasaki B 배지에서 7~10일간 현탁배양 하여 분리된 균사를 사용하였다.The rosacea fungus was isolated and cultured from seaweed lobes infected with erythema collected in Hoedong, Jindo-gun. 2A is a photomicrograph of seaweed lobes infected with R. Unlike normal cells in FIG. 1, traces of hyphae passing through Kim cells like threads can be seen in A of FIG. The infected area of the collected seaweed was cut and subcultured until separated from the cornmeal agar medium. The isolated strain was subcultured in a cornmeal agar medium at 20°C and a 12:12 hr L:D cycle for 21 days. When used in the experiment, the separated mycelia were used by suspension culture in Arasaki B medium for 7 to 10 days under the same light and temperature as the subculture conditions.

3) 낭균(Olpidiopsis pyropiae)3) Mycobacterium ( Olpidiopsis pyropiae )

낭균은 진도군 회동에서 채집한 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체를 방사무늬김으로 병균을 전이시켜 분리 배양하였다. 도 2의 B는 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체의 현미경 사진으로, 낭균병 감염에 의해 김 세포가 노랗게 변한 것을 보여준다. 배양조건은 15℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, 백색광(>50 μmol/m2·s1)을 사용하였으며 5~7일 주기로 새로운 방사무늬김을 넣어 주어 낭균을 유지하였다.Cystic bacillus was isolated and cultured by transferring the disease to radiation-patterned seaweed from seaweed lobes infected with cystomycosis collected from Hoedong, Jindo-gun. Figure 2B is a photomicrograph of seaweed fronds infected with cystomycosis, showing that the seaweed cells turned yellow due to infection with cystomycosis. The culture conditions were 15 ℃, 12:12 hr L:D cycle, white light (>50 μmol / m 2 · s 1 ) was used, and new radiation was added every 5 to 7 days to maintain cyst bacteria.

낭균의 감염 유도 및 감염률의 측정Induction of cyst infection and measurement of infection rate

1) 붉은갯병 1) Red mud bottle

Arasaki B 배지에서 7~10일간 현탁배양한 균사 형태의 붉은갯병균을 멸균된 해수에 24~30hr 동안 노출시켜 유주자의 방출을 유도하였다. 방출된 유주자의 세포수는 3.7%의 formaldehyde를 1/500로 희석한 고정액에 고정시킨 후 hemocytometer를 이용하여 측정하였다. 2.5×103 cell/ml의 유주자를 방사무늬김과 함께 멸균된 해수에서 배양하여 감염시켰다. 감염의 관찰 및 촬영은 광학현미경(OLYMPUS, BX50)과 cellSens program을 이용하였다. 감염률 측정은 image program인 Adobe Photoshop을 이용하여 촬영된 사진의 전체 면적 대비 감염면적을 비교하여 측정하였다.The mycelial rosacea fungus, which was cultured in suspension for 7 to 10 days in Arasaki B medium, was exposed to sterilized seawater for 24 to 30 hr to induce the release of zoospores. The cell number of released zoospores was measured using a hemocytometer after fixation in a fixative diluted with 3.7% formaldehyde at a rate of 1/500. Zoospores of 2.5 × 10 3 cell / ml were infected by culturing in sterilized seawater with radiation. The infection was observed and photographed using an optical microscope (OLYMPUS, BX50) and cellSens program. The infection rate was measured by comparing the infected area to the total area of the photograph taken using the image program Adobe Photoshop.

이하 실시예에서, 처리액의 종류 및 희석배율에 따른 감염률, 감염세포 수의 통계적 차이는 one-way ANOVA를 통해 확인하였다. 사후검정(Post-hoc test)을 통해 각각의 처리액의 종류 및 희석배율에 따른 차이를 확인하였다.In the following examples, the statistical difference in the infection rate and the number of infected cells according to the type of treatment solution and the dilution rate was confirmed through one-way ANOVA. The difference according to the type and dilution ratio of each treatment solution was confirmed through a post-hoc test.

2) 낭균병2) Cystomycosis

낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체에서 유주자를 방출시킨 후, 유주자가 포함된 감염수를 40 μm 필터로 여과하여 방사무늬김을 감염시켰다. 감염의 관찰 및 촬영은 붉은갯병과 동일한 방법으로 진행하였다. After releasing zoospores from seaweed fronds infected with cystomycosis, the infected water containing zoospores was filtered through a 40 μm filter to infect radiation. Observation and filming of infection were conducted in the same way as for red mantis.

붉은갯병에 대한 활성처리제 효능 검정Efficacy test of active treatment agent for red mud disease

1) 프로피온산과 젖산 처리 농도에 따른 감염 분석1) Infection analysis according to concentrations of propionic acid and lactic acid treatment

붉은갯병 감염 저해 효과가 우수한 프로피온산과 젖산의 최소 효과 농도를 분석하기 위하여 농도별(0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 wt%) 시료를 준비한 후 붉은갯병에 감염된 엽체에 15초간 처리하였다. 처리 직후 엽체를 멸균 해수에 세척하고 3일간 배양하여 대조구의 감염이 80%이상 진행된 것을 확인한 후 처리구의 갯병 감염률을 비교 측정하였다. In order to analyze the minimum effective concentrations of propionic acid and lactic acid, which have excellent inhibitory effects on red mantis infection, samples by concentration (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 wt%) were prepared, and then treated for 15 seconds on the thallus infected with red mantis. Immediately after treatment, the thallus was washed in sterilized seawater and cultured for 3 days to confirm that the infection of the control group had progressed by more than 80%, and then the infection rate of the treatment group was compared and measured.

도 3은 그 결과를 도시한 것으로, 프로피온산(PPA)은 0.25% 처리 시까지는 대조군의 감염률과 유의미한 차이가 없었으며, 0.5% 처리구의 감염률(52.7%)은 대조군의 감염률(90.9%)보다 낮았고, 1% 처리구에서 가장 낮은 감염률(5.63%)을 보였다. 또한, 도 3에서 젖산(LA)은 프로피온산에 비해 낮은 농도에서 효과를 나타냄을 확인할 수 있다. 0.1% 처리구의 감염률 84.5%는 0.25% 처리구의 감염률 4.0%와 0.5% 처리구의 감염률 4.2% 및 1% 처리구의 감염률 3.9%보다 높았으나, 대조구의 감염률 90.9%보다는 유의하게 낮았다.Figure 3 shows the results. Propionic acid (PPA) was not significantly different from the infection rate of the control group until 0.25% treatment, and the infection rate (52.7%) of the 0.5% treatment group was lower than that of the control group (90.9%), The lowest infection rate (5.63%) was shown in the 1% treatment group. In addition, it can be seen from FIG. 3 that lactic acid (LA) exhibits an effect at a lower concentration than propionic acid. The infection rate of 84.5% in the 0.1% treatment group was higher than the infection rate of 4.0% in the 0.25% treatment group, 4.2% in the 0.5% treatment group, and 3.9% in the 1% treatment group, but significantly lower than the infection rate of 90.9% in the control group.

프로피온산의 pH는 1% 용액에서 2.99, 0,1% 용액에서 3.83이었으며, 젖산의 pH는 1% 용액에서 2.24, 0.1% 용액에서 3.02로 젖산이 프로피온산에 비해 산성이 강하였다. The pH of propionic acid was 2.99 in 1% solution and 3.83 in 0.1% solution, and the pH of lactic acid was 2.24 in 1% solution and 3.02 in 0.1% solution, indicating that lactic acid was more acidic than propionic acid.

2) 유기산과 염산 혼합액의 처리에 따른 감염 분석2) Infection analysis according to treatment of mixed solution of organic acid and hydrochloric acid

김 양식어장 활성처리제 사용기준에 따르면 유기산을 주성분으로 하는 활성처리제에서 각 성분의 허용함유량은, 유기산은 10% 이상, 염소이온, 황산이온, 질산이온의 합계 함량은 8%이상 9.5%이하, 황산이온, 질산이온은 각각 2%이하이다.According to the standards for use of activator for seaweed farms, the allowable content of each component in an activator containing organic acid as the main component is 10% or more for organic acid, 8% or more and 9.5% or less for the total content of chlorine ion, sulfate ion, and nitrate ion, sulfuric acid ions and nitrate ions are each less than 2%.

이에 프로피온산(10 w%) + 염산(9 w% 또는 5 w%), 젖산(10 w%) + 염산(9 w% 또는 5 w%)의 조성을 갖는 활성처리제를 제조하였다. 활성처리제를 1/30로 멸균된 해수를 이용하여 희석한 후, 붉은갯병에 감염된 엽체에 15초간 처리한 다음 즉시 멸균 해수에 세척하였다. 이후 3일간 배양하여 대조구의 감염이 80% 이상 진행되었을 때 처리구의 감염률을 비교 측정하였다. Accordingly, an activating agent having a composition of propionic acid (10 w%) + hydrochloric acid (9 w% or 5 w%) and lactic acid (10 w%) + hydrochloric acid (9 w% or 5 w%) was prepared. After diluting the active treatment agent with 1/30 sterilized seawater, it was treated for 15 seconds on the fronds infected with red mantis, and then immediately washed with sterilized seawater. After culturing for 3 days, the infection rate of the treatment group was compared and measured when the infection of the control group had progressed to 80% or more.

대조군의 감염률은 83.7%였으며, 10% 프로피온산 처리구의 감염률 61.9%나 5% 염산 처리구의 감염률 69.2%, 9.5% 염산 처리구의 감염률 65.3%에 비해 10% 프로피온산과 5% 염산 또는 9.5% 염산 혼합물 처리구의 감염률은 각각 3.4%와 3.0%로 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합물 처리 시 효과가 매우 현저하였다.The infection rate of the control group was 83.7%, compared to the 10% propionic acid treatment group's infection rate of 61.9%, the 5% hydrochloric acid treatment group's infection rate of 69.2%, and the 9.5% hydrochloric acid treatment group's infection rate of 65.3%. The infection rate was 3.4% and 3.0%, respectively, and the effect was very remarkable when treated with a mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid.

반면, 10% 젖산 처리구의 감염률은 1.9%로 이미 매우 낮았기 때문에 추가로 5% 염산 또는 9.5% 염산을 혼합한 경우에도 젖산만 처리한 것에 비해 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. On the other hand, since the infection rate of the 10% lactic acid treatment group was already very low at 1.9%, even when additional 5% hydrochloric acid or 9.5% hydrochloric acid was mixed, there was no significant difference compared to the lactic acid only treatment.

3) 유기산과 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 감염 분석3) Infection analysis according to the dilution ratio of the mixture of organic acid and hydrochloric acid

유기산과 염산 혼합액을 희석하여 처리한 것을 제외하고는 2)와 동일한 방법에 의해 감염을 분석하였다.Infection was analyzed by the same method as in 2), except that the mixed solution of organic acid and hydrochloric acid was diluted.

10% 프로피온산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액은 희석배율이 증가할수록 감염률이 증가하였으며, 80배 희석액의 감염률은 대조군과 유사하였다. 참고로 9.5% 염산만을 희석하여 처리한 경우에는 대조군과 감염률에서 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(도 6 참조). 프로피온산의 50배 희석 처리구의 감염률은 21.3%로 대조군의 감염률 86.1%의 25% 수준으로 크게 감소하였다. 상기 용액 중 프로피온산의 농도는 0.2%로 해당 농도의 프로피온산 용액(도 3)이나, 염산 용액(도 6) 단독으로는 붉은갯병 방제효과를 나타내지 않아 혼합용액의 시너지 효과가 있음을 시사하였다.The infection rate of the 10% propionic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid mixture increased as the dilution ratio increased, and the infection rate of the 80-fold dilution was similar to that of the control group. For reference, when only 9.5% hydrochloric acid was diluted and treated, there was no significant difference between the control group and the infection rate (see FIG. 6). The infection rate of the 50-fold diluted propionic acid treatment group was 21.3%, which was significantly reduced to 25% of the control group's infection rate of 86.1%. The concentration of propionic acid in the solution was 0.2%, suggesting that the mixed solution had a synergistic effect because neither the propionic acid solution (FIG. 3) nor the hydrochloric acid solution (FIG. 6) at that concentration showed the control effect of erythema.

10% 젖산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액은 희석배율이 증가할수록 감염률이 증가하는 경향을 보여주었으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 50배, 60배, 80배 희석액의 감염률은 각각 3.3, 4.2, 5.2%로 대조군의 감염률 86.1%에 대해 약 3.8~6.0% 수준이었다. 젖산은 그 자체로 감염 억제 효과가 매우 크기 때문에 프로피온산에 비해서는 염산과의 혼합에 의한 시너지 효과가 약했지만, 역시 도 3과 도 6을 참조하여 농도를 환산해 보았을 때 혼합에 의한 시너지 효과를 나타내는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.The mixture of 10% lactic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid showed a tendency to increase the infection rate as the dilution ratio increased, but there was no significant difference. The infection rates of the 50-fold, 60-fold, and 80-fold dilutions were 3.3, 4.2, and 5.2%, respectively, which were about 3.8 to 6.0% compared to the control group's infection rate of 86.1%. Since lactic acid itself has a very large infection-inhibiting effect, the synergistic effect by mixing with hydrochloric acid was weaker than that of propionic acid, but when the concentration was converted with reference to FIGS. 3 and 6, could confirm that

4) 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액 처리에 따른 감염 분석4) Infection analysis according to the treatment of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid mixed solution

젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산을 하기 표 1의 농도가 되도록 혼합하여 활성저해제를 제조한 후 희석액을 처리한 것을 제외하고는 2)와 동일한 방법에 의해 붉은갯병 감염 저해 정도를 평가하였다. 그 결과는 표 1과 도 7에 도시하였다. 도 7에서 A, B, C는 각각 하기 표 1의 1, 2, 3의 실험군을 나타낸다.After preparing an active inhibitor by mixing lactic acid, propionic acid, and hydrochloric acid to the concentrations shown in Table 1, the degree of inhibition of rosacea infection was evaluated by the same method as in 2), except that the diluted solution was treated. The results are shown in Table 1 and FIG. 7 . In FIG. 7, A, B, and C represent experimental groups 1, 2, and 3 in Table 1, respectively.

Figure 112021005755559-pat00001
Figure 112021005755559-pat00001

9.5% 염산과 표 1의 조성물의 희석비율에 따른 용액의 pH를 유리전극(Hemilton, Liq-Glass BNC) 이 부착된 pH meter (NeoMet, pH/ISE Meter pH-250L) 로 측정하고 그 결과를 표 2에 기재하였다.The pH of the solution according to the dilution ratio of 9.5% hydrochloric acid and the composition of Table 1 was measured with a pH meter (NeoMet, pH/ISE Meter pH-250L) attached to a glass electrode (Hemilton, Liq-Glass BNC), and the results are shown in the table. 2.

Figure 112021005755559-pat00002
Figure 112021005755559-pat00002

낭균병에 대한 활성처리제 효능 검정Efficacy test of active treatment agent for cystomycosis

1) 유기산과 염산 혼합액의 희석배율에 따른 감염 분석1) Infection analysis according to the dilution ratio of the mixture of organic acid and hydrochloric acid

붉은갯병과 동일한 방법에 의해 유기산과 염산 혼합액을 희석하여 낭균병에 감염된 김 엽체에 처리하고, 감염 세포의 수를 관측하였다.A mixture of organic acid and hydrochloric acid was diluted according to the same method as for red midge disease, and treated with seaweed fronds infected with cystomycosis, and the number of infected cells was observed.

먼저 도 8은 9.5% 염산의 희석배율에 따른 낭균의 감염률을 나타낸 그래프로 9.5% 염산 희석액의 처리에 따라 감염률은 대략 20% 정도가 감소하였으나, 유의적이지는 않았다. First, FIG. 8 is a graph showing the infection rate of cysts according to the dilution ratio of 9.5% hydrochloric acid, and the infection rate decreased by about 20% according to the treatment of 9.5% hydrochloric acid dilution, but it was not significant.

도 9는 10% 프로피온산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액의 희석액 처리에 따른 낭균 감염률을 도시한 그래프이다. 프로피온산과 염산의 혼합액 30, 40, 50배 희석처리구의 감염 세포 수는 대조군의 감염 세포 수(98.6개) 보다 적었다. 30배 희석 처리구의 감염 세포 수(6.6개)와 40배 희석 처리구의 감염 세포 수(10.5개)는 유의미한 차이가 없었으며, 50배 희석 처리구의 감염 세포 수(30.2개) 보다 적었다. Figure 9 is a graph showing the infection rate of Cyst bacilli according to the dilution treatment of a mixture of 10% propionic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid. The number of infected cells in the mixture of propionic acid and hydrochloric acid diluted 30, 40, and 50 times was less than that of the control group (98.6). There was no significant difference between the number of infected cells in the 30-fold dilution treatment group (6.6 cells) and the 40-fold dilution treatment group (10.5 cells), and the number of infected cells in the 50-fold dilution treatment group (30.2 cells) was less.

10% 젖산과 9.5% 염산 혼합액은 희석배율이 증가할수록 감염률이 증가하는 경향을 보여주었다. 30배, 40배, 50배 희석액 처리 시의 감염 세포 수는 각각 60.6개, 73.8개, 89.8개로 대조군의 감염 세포 수 98.6개에 비해 61~91% 수준이었다. 50배 희석처리 시의 감염 세포 수는 대조군과 유의한 차이는 없었다. 붉은갯병에 대해서는 젖산이 함유된 희석액이 강력한 효과를 나타내었으나, 낭균에 대해서는 젖산의 희석액이 프로피온산에 비해 효과가 낮았다.The mixture of 10% lactic acid and 9.5% hydrochloric acid showed a tendency to increase the infection rate as the dilution ratio increased. The number of infected cells when treated with 30-fold, 40-fold, and 50-fold dilutions was 60.6, 73.8, and 89.8, respectively, which was 61-91% compared to 98.6 infected cells in the control group. The number of infected cells at 50-fold dilution was not significantly different from that of the control group. A dilution containing lactic acid showed a strong effect against red mantis, but a dilution of lactic acid was less effective than propionic acid against Cyst bacilli.

2) 젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산 혼합액 처리에 따른 감염 분석2) Infection analysis according to the treatment of lactic acid, propionic acid and hydrochloric acid mixed solution

젖산, 프로피온산 및 염산을 하기 표 3의 농도가 되도록 혼합하여 활성저해제를 제조한 후 희석액을 처리한 것을 제외하고는 1)와 동일한 방법에 의해 낭균병 감염 저해 정도를 평가하였다. 그 결과는 표 3과 도 11에 도시하였다.After preparing an active inhibitor by mixing lactic acid, propionic acid, and hydrochloric acid to the concentrations shown in Table 3, the degree of inhibition of Cystomycosis infection was evaluated by the same method as in 1), except that the diluted solution was treated. The results are shown in Table 3 and FIG. 11.

Figure 112021005755559-pat00003
Figure 112021005755559-pat00003

난균성 갯병 방제용 조성물의 농도에 따른 붉은갯병과 낭균병의 방제 효과 확인Confirmation of the control effect of erythrombosis and cystomycosis according to the concentration of the composition for controlling oomycete gallbladder disease

붉은갯병과 낭균병의 동시 방제를 위한 조성물의 최적 조성을 확인하기 위하여, 9.5% 염산 및 젖산과 프로피온산의 혼합물을 젖산과 프로피온산의 비율을 변화시키며 방제 효과를 비교하였다.In order to confirm the optimal composition of the composition for the simultaneous control of red mud disease and cystomycosis, 9.5% hydrochloric acid and a mixture of lactic acid and propionic acid were compared with the control effect while changing the ratio of lactic acid and propionic acid.

도 12는 30배 희석액을 사용한 처리 결과를 보여주는 그래프로, LA는 젖산을 CP는 프로피온산을 나타낸다. 도 12로부터 프로피온산과 젖산의 중량비가 7:5~3:5인 경우 붉은갯병과 낭균병을 동시에 우수한 효율로 방제할 수 있음을 보여준다. 12 is a graph showing the treatment results using a 30-fold dilution, where LA represents lactic acid and CP represents propionic acid. Figure 12 shows that when the weight ratio of propionic acid to lactic acid is 7:5 to 3:5, it is possible to control rosacea and cystomycosis at the same time with excellent efficiency.

Claims (9)

삭제delete 삭제delete 삭제delete 삭제delete 프로피온산 0.5~10 중량% 및 염산 8~9.5 중량%를 포함하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
An active treatment composition for simultaneous control of cystomycosis and red foot disease, comprising 0.5 to 10% by weight of propionic acid and 8 to 9.5% by weight of hydrochloric acid.
청구항 5에 있어서,
젖산과 프로피온산의 중량비가 7:3~5:5가 되도록 젖산을 추가로 함유하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
The method of claim 5,
An active treatment composition for simultaneous control of cystomycosis and rosacea, characterized in that it additionally contains lactic acid so that the weight ratio of lactic acid and propionic acid is 7: 3 to 5: 5.
삭제delete 청구항 5 또는 청구항 6에 있어서,
상기 활성처리제 조성물을 해수로 희석하여 5초~1분간 처리하는 것을 특징으로 하는 낭균병 및 붉은갯병의 동시 방제를 위한 활성처리제 조성물.
According to claim 5 or claim 6,
An active treatment composition for simultaneous control of cystomycosis and red foot disease, characterized in that the active treatment composition is diluted with seawater and treated for 5 seconds to 1 minute.
삭제delete
KR1020210006201A 2020-01-29 2021-01-15 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease KR102549525B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020230081221A KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020200010527 2020-01-29
KR20200010527 2020-01-29

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020230081221A Division KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20210097024A KR20210097024A (en) 2021-08-06
KR102549525B1 true KR102549525B1 (en) 2023-06-30

Family

ID=77315314

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020210006201A KR102549525B1 (en) 2020-01-29 2021-01-15 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease
KR1020230081221A KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020230081221A KR20230098121A (en) 2020-01-29 2023-06-23 Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (2) KR102549525B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102612026B1 (en) 2022-10-14 2023-12-08 공주대학교 산학협력단 Disease-Resistant P. tenera Variants

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3631466B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-03-23 扶桑化学工業株式会社 Cultured laver treatment agent, cultured laver treatment solution, and cultured laver treatment method
KR100856757B1 (en) 2008-04-28 2008-09-05 (주)대성케미칼 Acidic agent for use in a laver farm
KR101752610B1 (en) 2016-12-08 2017-06-29 명지테크 주식회사 Active treatment agent for laver farming

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2625298A1 (en) 1976-06-04 1977-12-22 Linde Ag GUIDE DEVICE FOR THE CAGE OF A SEGMENT ROLLING BEARING
JPS595004B2 (en) 1978-03-15 1984-02-02 東洋紡績株式会社 Hollow fiber membrane separation equipment
KR20000060843A (en) 1999-03-19 2000-10-16 곽효섭 organic acid treatment for laver cultivation
JP4717424B2 (en) * 2004-12-01 2011-07-06 第一製網株式会社 Nori treatment method and nori treatment agent for controlling noriweed and disease control of nori
KR20200000147A (en) * 2018-06-22 2020-01-02 한국산업기술대학교산학협력단 Laser cleaning apparatus

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3631466B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-03-23 扶桑化学工業株式会社 Cultured laver treatment agent, cultured laver treatment solution, and cultured laver treatment method
KR100856757B1 (en) 2008-04-28 2008-09-05 (주)대성케미칼 Acidic agent for use in a laver farm
KR101752610B1 (en) 2016-12-08 2017-06-29 명지테크 주식회사 Active treatment agent for laver farming

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
22nd International Seaweed Symposium. 2016.06.19-24*
해양수산부고시 제2020-147호. 2020.09.07
현대해양. 박종면 기자. 2019.01.07

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20210097024A (en) 2021-08-06
KR20230098121A (en) 2023-07-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Tang et al. Characterization of the toxicity of Cochlodinium polykrikoides isolates from Northeast US estuaries to finfish and shellfish
Fukami et al. Stimulative and inhibitory effects of bacteria on the growth of microalgae
KR20230098121A (en) Active Treatment Agent Composition for Simultaneous Control of Olpidiopsis blight and Red-Rot Disease
Zhu et al. Antifungal properties and AFB1 detoxification activity of a new strain of Lactobacillus plantarum
JPWO2006101060A1 (en) Prevention method for crustacean mold and fish mold using Bacillus subtilis
Granke et al. Effects of temperature, concentration, age, and algaecides on Phytophthora capsici zoospore infectivity
US9115012B2 (en) Method of improving the water quality in aquatic ecosystems
KR100856757B1 (en) Acidic agent for use in a laver farm
Czeczuga et al. Aquatic fungi developing on the eggs of certain fresh water fish species and their environment
CN106259511B (en) A kind of biological algicide
KR102342443B1 (en) Method of farming laver using acid treatment agent
KR102489018B1 (en) A Paucibacter sp. strain having algicidal activity against Microcystis aeruginosa and uses thereof
Wang et al. Allelopathic effects of macroalga Corallina pilulifera on the red-tide forming alga Heterosigma akashiwo under laboratory conditions
KR102351383B1 (en) Composition for controlling red tide comprising Fictibacillus sp. or their medium as effective component
KR101752610B1 (en) Active treatment agent for laver farming
EP1613739B1 (en) Process for colour reduction of pulp & paper effluent
Thummar et al. Antioxidant defence system induced by seed priming with nanoparticles to restrain Fusarium wilt in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)
Mincuzzi et al. Effectiveness of alternative means for controlling pomegranate postharvest pathogens
KR20100089956A (en) Composition comprising nano-silver compounds for enhansing control of harmful algae and method for controlling harmful algae using the same
CN112661275A (en) Blue algae water purifying material for removing natural water eutrophication and eliminating biological compound mixing
KR102570041B1 (en) Compositions for Exterminating Pythium chondricola in Pyropia Comtaining Peracetic acid and Method of Exterminating Pythium chondricola
Zhang et al. Aspergillus niger produces lethal compounds against nematodes
KR102556901B1 (en) Edenia sp. NNIBRFG15114 strain isolated from freshwater having antifungal activity and plant growth promotion and uses thereof
KR102651204B1 (en) Selective medium composition for Sclerotium sp. fungi and uses thereof
Ali Antifungal activity of sodium chloride on Saprolegnia diclina and Aphanomyces sp.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
AMND Amendment
E601 Decision to refuse application
AMND Amendment
N231 Notification of change of applicant
X701 Decision to grant (after re-examination)
GRNT Written decision to grant