KR20190105193A - Method for transaction of patent technology comprising procurement information - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for matching a technology transaction by allowing a technology evaluator who is a potential technology demander to evaluate a value for intangible technology including intangible property rights such as patent rights where an interest is caused by procurement information of a same technology field. According to the present invention, when one person of a plurality of suppliers (such as technology sellers) provides a technology to be evaluated to a server and requests technology value evaluation, the server requests value evaluation to unspecified or specified evaluators. When the plurality of evaluators respectively suggest an evaluation value after evaluating the corresponding technology, the evaluation value data is accumulated and analyzed such that a technology value is determined and then, the determined technology value is notified to the supplier. Therefore, an interest of an evaluator is increased by procurement information such that a technology transaction can be further activated.

Description

Method for transaction of patent technology comprising procurement information}

The present invention relates to a patented technology trading method.

Patent transactions and patent recommendation systems are required for technology transactions, and building such a system by itself was not easy because it cost more than billions of dollars. Most domestic and foreign mid-sized and small venture companies have not been able to establish their own patent search and patent recommendation system, and have been seeking patent search and useful technology by requesting a patent law firm. This difficulty has been an obstacle to the development of the technology commercialization market through patent technology trading.

Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1692701 discloses a technique for recommending a patent based on patent information, patent classification information, and social tagging information. Incentives are given to users to pay points according to event activity details and the accumulated points can be cashed through banks. This technology allows users to search for patents using the search function, tag the patents they are interested in, search for and recommend similar patents, and at the same time, technology similarity, content similarity, Social tag similarity is determined and weighted to recommend technology more efficiently. Through this, it is characterized by recommending patents desired by the user.

Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1619566 discloses a technology value evaluation method. In the present invention, if one of the plurality of suppliers (technical sellers) provides the server with the technology to be evaluated, the server collects the evaluation value and notifies the supplier of the technical value when the technical consumer evaluates and provides the value. It features. This allows technology suppliers to identify market needs and technology consumers to receive information about the technology they need. The acceptance of information on technology by a technology consumer can be regarded as playing the role of "recommended" of the Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1692701. Patent No. 10-1692701 analyzes whether the user's tag is tagged or not. Only if qualitative analysis is possible, Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1619566 proposes a price. The difference is that quantitative analysis is possible. However, Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1619566 does not include the technology to consider when determining the recommended patent by analyzing the technology similarity and content similarity.

Even though these types of patents are registered for the transaction of patent technology, there is a difficulty in evaluating technology value and trading if there is no active participation of the participants. Both of the above two patents attempted to increase participation by giving participants in some form of incentives, but it seems difficult to bring out the participants' active participation.

While making efforts to promote technology value evaluation and technology transaction through active participation of the evaluator, the evaluator's active participation knows that participation is increased by how big his / her profit is, Considering the high degree of participation, the present invention was completed by adding a database for rearranging the profits by improving the prior patent 10-1619566.

It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved technology trading method.

For the above purpose, the present invention provides a technology trading method further comprising providing keywords related to the benefits of the technical value evaluator in addition to the technology of the prior art 10-1619566. More specifically, procurement of national, local governments and certain specific organizations by using one or more patent-related profit keywords (hereinafter referred to as 'profit keywords') selected from the group consisting of patents, trademarks, designs, utility models, intellectual property, etc. Providing a technology trading method including attaching the procurement information extracted from the plan and requesting a valuation of the trading technology. This will be described in more detail as follows.

Providing the server with the evaluation system server with the technology to be traded by one of the plurality of suppliers; Classifying a technical field with respect to the provided technology; Receiving a detailed technical field of a technical value assessor; Classifying the technical field of the technical value assessor; Selecting a technical value evaluator having high agreement between the technical field of the evaluation target technical field and the technical evaluator; Extracting procurement information of the technical field from procurement information data using one or more patent-related benefit keywords selected from the group consisting of patents, trademarks, designs, utility models, intellectual property, and the like; Requesting the technical value assessor to evaluate the technical value of the provided technology together with the procurement information; In the case of requesting the evaluation of the technology of two or more, providing the technology to be evaluated in order to be evaluated first as the similarity between the provided technology and the technology value evaluator is higher; When each of the one or more evaluators evaluates the value of the corresponding technology and presents the evaluation value, collecting and analyzing the evaluation value data to determine the technical value; Notifying the technology supplier of the determined technical value; Storing information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step; And performing a technology transaction matching using information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step.

In other words, when one of the plurality of suppliers makes a valuation request while providing the server with the technology to be evaluated, the server makes a valuation request to an unspecified or specific number of evaluators. At this time, the procurement information is provided with which the evaluator may be interested. When each of the multiple evaluators evaluates the technology and presents its value, the valuation data is collected and analyzed to determine the value of the technology and notify the supplier of the determined value.

The valuation method according to the present invention is performed by the valuation management unit of the valuation system.

The evaluation management unit has a technical field decision unit. The technical field of the provided technology and the technical field of the technical evaluator are subdivided.

The evaluation management unit has a procurement information extraction unit. The procurement information extraction unit extracts procurement information from the procurement information data using one or more patent-related interest keywords selected from the group consisting of patents, trademarks, designs, utility models, intellectual property, and the like. The procurement information is sent to the evaluator along with the provided technology, and serves to draw the attention of the evaluator to induce the evaluation of the provided technology.

There is an evaluation order determining unit in the evaluation management unit. The evaluation order determining unit decides the order in which the technology to be evaluated and the technical value evaluator have a higher similarity in the technical field.

There is an evaluation control unit in the evaluation management unit. The evaluation control unit performs the technical valuation sequentially. If the evaluator does not evaluate the first technique presented, then the second technique is not given an opportunity to evaluate. Only the evaluator who evaluated the second technique is given the opportunity to evaluate the third technique. Therefore, evaluation is compelled so that technical evaluation cannot be continued unless the evaluation is faithful. The same holds true for the remaining technical evaluations. Therefore, the evaluator who wants to evaluate or verify the second technique must perform the mandatory evaluation of the first technique. In this way, the evaluation order should be limited to force the evaluation. Bad evaluators are potentially deleted from the evaluator database.

There is an evaluation history management department. The evaluation history manager manages the evaluation history. The evaluator who earns the evaluation is given credits for the evaluation integrity (such as cyber money). The evaluator who did not make the evaluation is deducted from the credit which was paid in advance according to the evaluation insufficiency. If all credits have been deducted, you will lose the qualification and if the penalty period has elapsed, you will be credited again to participate in the evaluation.

The evaluation history management department separately manages appraisers such as those with high technical values among technology suppliers and appraisers or companies with a large number of employees as potential technical consumers. The information of the technical consumer is kept confidential and owned by the operator of the evaluation system. The evaluation system operator can use the information of the technology supplier and the technology owner to utilize the technology transaction.

The evaluation technical information provider presents the technical information to the technical supplier, that is, the technical value determined by the evaluator. The technology value estimation method uses CVM (contingent valuation methods). Various modifications to the CVM will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, Kwon Oh-sang, "Environmental Economics", 2nd Edition (Park, Young-sa, 1999) pp 495-596.

It stores the information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step.

The technology transaction server performs the technology transaction matching by performing the technology transaction matching using the information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step.

The present invention provides procurement information for attracting a technology value evaluator so that technology transaction is activated as compared to the conventional technology transaction method. Similar to the price determination of commodities, evaluators and suppliers are directly involved in evaluating the value of intangible technology and intangible property rights, so that the existing subjective pricing decisions are overcome. It is possible to achieve objectification or coherence of price determination for property rights and the like.

The present invention facilitates technology trading by preliminarily evaluating the value of technology that has not yet entered the market.

The present invention is useful for identifying potential technology consumers.

The present invention activates technology transactions by developing market-friendly products by deriving various values of technical values based on the information of technology evaluators so that they can be useful references for technology suppliers.

1 is an overall configuration diagram of a method according to the invention.
Figure 2 is an internal configuration diagram of the evaluation management unit for administering the performance of the method of the present invention.
3 is a more detailed process of the technical evaluation application in FIG.
4 is an exemplary view of a questionnaire usable at the time of a valuation request.
FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of the questionnaire of FIG. 4. FIG.
6 is an example process for granting a given credit to an evaluator who has completed a valuation.
7 is a process of determining the value of the technology by analyzing this valuation data when a plurality of evaluators have presented the valuation value.

1 is a schematic process flow diagram of a method for evaluating technical value according to the present invention.

Multiple technology provider clients and multiple technology evaluator clients communicate over the server. Hereafter, the supplier client will be abbreviated as 'provider' and the evaluator client will be referred to as 'evaluator'. At this time, the supplier and the evaluator are mainly used as client computers. It was also used as a subject of buying act.

When one of a number of suppliers submits a technology valuation application to the server that provides the technology they wish to trade or to be valued, the server provides the procurement information that the evaluator should be interested in, valuation to an unspecified or specific number of evaluators. Make a request. Multiple evaluators collect and analyze the valuation data presented by each evaluator to determine the value of the technology and notify the supplier of the determined technology value.

The technology transaction server unit performs technology transaction matching using information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined by the evaluation management unit.

2 is a configuration diagram of the evaluation management unit.

The technical field decision unit subdivides the technical field of the provided technology and the technical field of the technical evaluator.

The procurement information extraction unit extracts procurement information corresponding to the technical field from the procurement information data by using any one or more patent related profit keywords selected from the group consisting of patents, trademarks, designs, utility models, intellectual property, and the like.

The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that the higher the similarity between the provided technology and the technical value assessor, the higher the technical field is.

The evaluation control unit performs the evaluation sequentially, and does not give the evaluator an opportunity for evaluating the second technique unless the first technique is valued. Only the evaluator who evaluated the second technique is given the opportunity to evaluate the third technique. The same holds true for the remaining technical evaluations. Therefore, the evaluator who wants to evaluate the value of the second technology or want to confirm the technology must make a mandatory evaluation of the first technology. In this way, the evaluation order should be limited to force the evaluation. Bad evaluators are potentially deleted from the evaluator database.

The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that a plurality of techniques can be evaluated. Multiple techniques can be evaluated at one time. The order of evaluation techniques may be arranged randomly or presented to evaluators in a certain order. Preferably, they are arranged randomly so that the evaluation opportunity does not change for each technique according to the evaluation order. An evaluator who is presented with a technique can evaluate the second technique after evaluating the first technique, and only after evaluating the second technique. If the first technique is not evaluated, the remaining techniques cannot be evaluated.

The evaluation history manager manages the evaluation history. The history of the assessment is managed and evaluated. The evaluator who faithfully evaluates the cyber money for the evaluation integrity. The evaluator who did not perform the evaluation is deducted from the cyber money that was paid in advance according to the evaluation unfaithfulness. If all the cyber money is deducted, the evaluation qualification will be lost, and if the penalty period is exceeded, the cyber money will be paid again to participate in the evaluation. The evaluation history management department separately manages potential technical consumer information selected from the evaluators, such as those with high technical values among the technology suppliers and evaluators, or companies with a large number of employees. The information of the technical consumer is kept confidential and owned by the operator of the evaluation system. The evaluation system operator can use the information of the technology supplier and the technology owner to utilize the technology transaction.

The evaluation technical information provider informs the technical supplier of the evaluation technical information, that is, the technical value evaluated by the evaluator. As a technique value estimation method, for example, CVM (contingent valuation methods) is used.

3 illustrates a more detailed process of applying for a technology valuation in FIG. 1.

When a supplier submits a valuation request by providing his or her technology or patent rights to a server, the valuation application is stored in the server's technology database. Upon receipt of the application, or at some point after being stored in the "evaluation technology" database, it is sent directly to the relevant evaluator (eg via email or push service) or broadcasted in a post, such as a homepage, to request a valuation.

Valuation requests can be made in the form of questionnaires. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the questionnaire may post the technical content together with the patent information including the profit keyword, and allow the evaluator to directly write the evaluation amount or select the evaluation amount by a radio button. In addition, the evaluator basic information (eg, industry, number of employees, gender, age, etc.) that can be reflected in the valuation can be entered. When inputting the basic information of the evaluator, the formal entry may be selected through a radio button.

On the other hand, after completing the response to the questionnaire of the first technology as shown in Figure 5, and subsequently request a valuation for the next technology (second technology), the evaluator presses the button at the bottom of the questionnaire 2 You can have the questionnaire respond to a questionnaire about the technology (of course, other methods are possible, for example using a negative query method such as "If you don't want a valuation of the technology then press exit") As long as it is not pressed, an evaluation questionnaire for the next technology may be automatically developed). This process is repeated for the third, fourth, .... techniques and the questionnaire is finally completed. When the evaluator has completed the evaluation, the evaluator may be given a predetermined cyber money as a credit (see FIG. 6). The cyber money or credit granted to the evaluator may be used for various purposes. (For example, if you are applying for a trader's technology as a supplier, you can use it to calculate the cost and give priority to those with higher credits.)

7 shows a process of collecting and analyzing the valuation data when a plurality of evaluators have presented the valuation value to determine the value of the corresponding technology.

First, the data are collected and analyzed. For analysis, the distribution of valuations by type of business or number of employees in evaluator basic information is found. This is the same as illustrated in FIG. 7. In FIG. 7, an analysis of distribution of valuation value data by an evaluator company of 1 to 10 employees, 10 to 50 employees, and 50 to 100 employees in the A-type business is illustrated. For example, the technical value ranges P1 to P2, P1 'to P2', and P1 "to P2" distributed between a maximum and a predetermined percentage of the number of responders (e.g., 70, 80, 90, 95%, etc.) are described. Determined as the range of technical values evaluated for.

If the technical value range is determined, the supplier is informed. Notification can also be conducted using a 1: 1 communication method such as an email or a push service, or posting on a post such as a homepage.

Claims (9)

In the technology trading method through a survey,
Providing the server with the evaluation system server with the technology to be traded by one of the plurality of suppliers;
Classifying a technical field with respect to the provided technology;
Receiving a detailed technical field of a technical value assessor;
Classifying the technical field of the technical value assessor;
Selecting a technical value evaluator having high agreement between the technical field of the evaluation target technical field and the technical evaluator;
Extracting procurement information of the technical field from procurement information data using one or more patent-related benefit keywords selected from the group consisting of patents, trademarks, designs, utility models, and intellectual property;
Requesting the technical value assessor to evaluate the technical value of the provided technology together with the procurement information;
In the case of requesting the evaluation of the technology of two or more, providing the technology to be evaluated in order to be evaluated first as the similarity between the provided technology and the technology value evaluator is higher;
When each of the one or more evaluators evaluates the value of the corresponding technology and presents the evaluation value, collecting and analyzing the evaluation value data to determine the technical value;
Notifying the technology supplier of the determined technical value;
Storing information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step; And
A technical transaction method comprising the step of performing a technical transaction matching using the information of potential technical consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step. The method according to claim 1, wherein said evaluator is a certain number.  The method according to claim 1, wherein said evaluator is an unspecified majority. The method of claim 1, further comprising pre-selecting the evaluator by technical field, job field, gender, age, or the like. The method according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation system server includes an evaluator database for managing an evaluation history for the evaluator. The method according to claim 1, further comprising an evaluation history management step of managing the evaluation history. The method according to claim 6, wherein the evaluation history management step further includes the step of paying or subtracting credit for the evaluation integrity of the evaluator. 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the evaluation history management step further includes deriving as a potential technical consumer an evaluator such as a technology supplier and an evaluator who set a high technical value or a company with a large number of employees. . The technical transaction method according to claim 1, further comprising a step of providing evaluation technology information to the technology provider, that is, presenting the technology value determined by the evaluator.

Images