KR101619566B1 - Method of valuation of technology - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for allowing an evaluator (e.g., a technical consumer) to directly evaluate the value of an intangible technology including intangible property rights such as patents. According to the present invention, when one of a plurality of suppliers (for example, a technology vendor) makes a technology valuation application while providing a technology to be evaluated to a server, the server makes a request for valuation to an unspecified or specific multiple evaluators. When each of the multiple evaluators evaluates the technology and presents the evaluation value, the evaluation value data is collected and analyzed to determine the technical value, and the determined technical value is notified to the supplier.

Description

{Method of valuation of technology}

The present invention relates to a method for directly evaluating and encouraging an evaluator to evaluate the value of intangible technology including intangible property rights such as patents.

As the network infrastructure such as the Internet developed, various fields of automation or networking were made.

There is a need to evaluate the technology value (including the price calculation) for various technologies, ideas, sales, purchase, security, loan, license setting, evaluation, etc. of intangible property rights such as patent, utility model, design and copyright . It is common that the prices of goods and services such as industrial goods are determined macroscopically by the demand and supply by the economic public unless there is intervention by the government authorities. However, in the case of intangible technology or intangible property rights, It is a reality that it is based on subjective judgment by a specialist.

The present invention can be achieved by evaluating intangible technology and intangible property rights prices directly from an evaluator (for example, a technical consumer) using recent automation technology, network, mobile technology, etc., And to provide a method for evaluating the value of the technology.

In order to achieve the above object, a technical value evaluation method according to the present invention is based on a technical value evaluation method through a survey, which includes providing technology to be evaluated by one of a plurality of suppliers to an evaluation system server ; Indexing the provided technique together with other techniques, and determining a technique evaluation order; Requesting a specific or unspecified evaluator to evaluate the technology according to the determined order; When each of the multiple evaluators evaluates the value of the technology and presents the evaluation value, the evaluation value data is collected and analyzed to determine the technical value; And notifying the technical supplier of the determined technical value.

delete

That is, when one of a plurality of suppliers makes a valuation application by providing the server with the technique to be evaluated, the server makes an evaluation request to an unspecified or specific multiple evaluators. When each of the multiple evaluators evaluates the technology and presents its value, the evaluation value data is collected and analyzed to determine the value of the technology, and the determined value is notified to the supplier.

Multiple evaluators can be pre-screened by technology, job field, or age group. More specifically, the evaluator may be a group of consumers. In the evaluator database, the evaluation history of the evaluator is managed. People with bad evaluation results can be excluded from future evaluations, and evaluation is compulsory. However, the evaluator who is excluded from the evaluation group may be re-evaluated as the evaluator once the penalty period for a certain period has elapsed.

The valuation method according to the present invention is performed by the valuation manager of the valuation system that performs the process of this method. In the following, the evaluation management unit is used together with the term evaluation server.

The evaluation management section has an evaluation control section. The evaluation control unit causes the evaluation of the technology value to proceed sequentially. If you do not evaluate the first technique presented to the evaluator, you will not be given an opportunity to evaluate the second technique. Only the evaluator who has evaluated the second technology will be given the opportunity to evaluate the third technology. Therefore, if the evaluation is not made faithful, evaluation will be made so that the technology evaluation can not be continued. The same goes for the rest of the technology evaluation. Therefore, the evaluator who wishes to evaluate or confirm the second technology must make a mandatory evaluation of the first technology. In this way, it is necessary to limit the evaluator's evaluation order to enforce the evaluation. Evaluators with poor evaluation scores are potentially deleted from the evaluator database.

The evaluation management unit has an evaluation order determination unit. The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that a plurality of techniques can be evaluated. Multiple skills can be evaluated at once. The order of the evaluation techniques is randomly arranged or presented to the evaluator in a certain order. The evaluator who is presented with the technology can evaluate the second technique after evaluating the first technique, and evaluate the third technique only after the evaluation of the second technology. If the first technology is not evaluated, the remaining technology can not be evaluated.

The evaluation management section has an evaluation history management section. The evaluation history management unit manages the evaluation history. Evaluators who make good evaluations are given credits (such as cyber money) for evaluation integrity. For those who did not make the evaluation sound, deduct the credit that was paid in advance according to the unfair evaluation. If all credits are deducted, the qualification is lost and if the penalty period expires, the credits will be re-credited to participate in the evaluation.

The evaluation history management department manages those who set high technical value among technology suppliers and evaluators, or evaluators such as enterprises with large number of employees as potential technicians. The information of the technical user is kept secret and is owned by the person operating the evaluation system. The evaluation system operator can utilize the information of the technology provider and the technology owner for technical transactions.

Evaluation Technical Information In the provision of the technical evaluation information, the technical value determined by the evaluator is presented to the technical supplier. The technology valuation method uses CVM (contingent valuation methods). Various modifications to the CVM will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, Kwon Oh-Sang, "Environmental Economics," 2nd edition (Park Young-sa, 1999) pp 495-596.

Meanwhile, a technology trading matching unit may be additionally included, storing information on potential technical customers and technical suppliers determined in the evaluation management unit, and managing the progress of the technology trade.

Similar to the pricing of tangible goods, the evaluator and the supplier are directly involved to evaluate the value of intangible technology and intangible property rights, thereby overcoming the limitations of the conventional subjective pricing decision and overcoming the intangible technology and intangible property rights It becomes possible to achieve objectification or consistency of price determination.

The present invention allows for a preliminary assessment of the value of technologies that have not yet entered the market.

The present invention is useful for identifying potential technical users.

The present invention makes it possible to evaluate the technical value of each technical field, thereby increasing the level of technical value evaluation.

The present invention makes it possible to provide a useful reference to a technology provider by deriving the technical value of various values based on the information of the technology evaluator.

The present invention enforces a technical evaluation to the technical evaluator so that the technical evaluation can be properly performed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a general process schematic of a method according to the invention.
FIG. 2 is an internal configuration view of an evaluation management unit that conducts the method of the present invention. FIG.
Figure 3 is a more detailed process of applying for a technology evaluation in Figure 1;
Figure 4 is an example of a questionnaire that is available upon request for valuation;
5 is a view for explaining another embodiment of the questionnaire of FIG. 4;
6 is a process of an embodiment in which a predetermined credit is awarded to an evaluator who has completed evaluation of value.
7 is a process of analyzing the evaluation value data when a plurality of evaluators present evaluation values and determining the value of the technology.

1 is a schematic process flow diagram of a technology valuation method according to the present invention.

A number of technology provider clients and a number of technology evaluator clients are communicating through the server. Hereinafter, the supplier client and the evaluator client are abbreviated as "supplier" and "evaluator", respectively. In this case, the supplier and the evaluator are mainly used as the meaning of the client computer. However, in some cases, As a means of taking part in the purchase.

When a technology valuation application is filed while one of a plurality of suppliers is providing a server with a technology to be traded or valued, the server makes a request for valuation to an unspecified or specific multiple evaluator. A number of evaluators collect and analyze the evaluation value data presented by them, determine the value of the technology, and notify the supplier of the determined technology value.

FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram of an evaluation management unit acting as a backbone in the evaluation system for performing the method of FIG.

The evaluation control unit makes the evaluation progress in sequence and does not give an evaluation opportunity for the second technique unless evaluation is performed on the first technique presented to the evaluator. Only the evaluator who has evaluated the second technology will be given the opportunity to evaluate the third technology. The same goes for the rest of the technology evaluation. Therefore, the evaluator who wishes to evaluate the value of the second technology or to verify the technology should make a mandatory evaluation of the first technology. In this way, it is necessary to limit the evaluator's evaluation order to enforce the evaluation. Evaluators with poor evaluation scores are potentially deleted from the evaluator database.

The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that a plurality of techniques can be evaluated. Multiple technologies can be evaluated at once. The order of the evaluation techniques is randomly arranged or presented to the evaluator in a certain order. Preferably, they are randomly arranged so that evaluation opportunities are not changed for each technology by the evaluation procedure. An evaluator with a description of the technology can evaluate the first technique after the evaluation of the second technique, and the evaluation of the second technique after the evaluation of the second technique. If the first technology is not evaluated, the remaining technology can not be evaluated.

The evaluation history management unit manages the evaluation history. The history of the evaluation is managed and evaluated. Cyber money is provided to the evaluator for the sincerity of evaluation. For those who did not make the evaluation sound, deduct the cyber money paid in advance according to the unfair evaluation. If the cyber money is deducted, the qualification is lost, and if the penalty period expires, the cyber money will be paid again and the participant will be able to participate in the evaluation. The evaluation history management department manages the potential technical user information selected among the evaluators, such as the technology supplier and the evaluator who have set high technical value or have a large number of employees, separately. The information of the technical user is kept secret and is owned by the person operating the evaluation system. The evaluation system operator can utilize the information of the technical supplier and the technical user for technical transaction.

Evaluation Technical Information In the provision of technical information, the technical supplier notifies the technical evaluation information, that is, the technical value evaluated by the evaluator. The technical value is based on the results of the evaluations evaluated by the evaluator. Therefore, it is desirable to arrange the evaluation order so that all technologies can be evaluated as much as possible. For example, CVM (contingent valuation methods) is used as a technology valuation method.

Meanwhile, a technology trading matching unit may be additionally included, storing information on potential technical customers and technical suppliers determined in the evaluation management unit, and managing the progress of the technology trade.

FIG. 3 illustrates a more detailed process of applying the technology valuation in FIG.

When a supplier submits a value appraisal by providing its own technology or patent right to the server, the appraisal application is stored in the technical database of the server. Immediately upon receipt of the application, or at a certain time after being stored in the "Assessment Skills" database, it is sent directly to the relevant evaluator (eg via email or push service) or broadcast on a post on the homepage to request valuation.

Requests for valuation can be made in the form of questionnaires. As shown in FIG. 4, the questionnaire can be made to post the description of the technique, allowing the evaluator to directly write the evaluation value or select the evaluation value by radio button. In addition, it is possible to input basic evaluator information (for example, industry type, number of employees, sex, age, etc.) that can be reflected in the valuation. When the evaluator basic information is inputted, the formulated entry can be selected through the radio button.

On the other hand, as a further embodiment, when a response to the questionnaire of the first technique is completed and a value evaluation for the next technology (second technique) is subsequently requested as shown in Fig. 5, the evaluator presses the button at the bottom of the questionnaire You can also respond to a questionnaire about the technology (of course, other ways are possible, such as using the negative query method to select buttons such as "Do not want to value the next technology" If you do not press it, you can automatically have an evaluation questionnaire developed for the next technology). This process is repeated for the third, fourth, .... technology, and the questionnaire is finally completed. When the evaluator has completed the evaluation, the evaluator can be given a predetermined cyber money as a credit (refer to FIG. 6). The cyber money or credit granted to the evaluator may be used for a variety of purposes. (For example, when you apply for a transaction as a provider, you can use it to calculate the cost of the technology you have, and you can give the person with the higher credit the priority of evaluating.)

FIG. 7 shows a process of collecting and analyzing the evaluation value data when a plurality of evaluators presents the evaluation value, and determining the value of the technology.

First, data is collected and analyzed. For the analysis, the distribution of valuation is determined by the type of industry or the number of employees in the basic information of the evaluator. This is the same as illustrated in Fig. FIG. 7 illustrates an analysis of the distribution of the evaluation value data for each of the evaluator companies having the number of employees of 1 to 10, 10 to 50, and 50 to 100 in the A industry. For example, the technical value ranges P1 to P2, P'1 to P'2, P "1 to P ", which are distributed between a predetermined percentage (for example, 70, 80, 90, 95% 2 as the range of technology value evaluated for that technology.

Once the scope of the technology value is determined, it is notified to the supplier. The method of notification may be a method of using a 1: 1 communication method such as an e-mail or a push service, or posting on a post such as a homepage.

Claims (26)

A technology valuation client communicating with a plurality of technology evaluator clients operated by a plurality of technology provider clients (hereinafter referred to as a "supplier client") operated by a plurality of technology providers and a plurality of technology evaluator clients (hereinafter referred to as " A method for evaluating a technical value performed in a system configured by a server (hereinafter referred to as an 'evaluation server'),
(1) the plurality of supplier clients transmit a plurality of technical value evaluation applications to the evaluation server in response to the evaluation target technology input by the corresponding technology provider associated with the provider client and the evaluation application for the technology step;
(2) The evaluation server, receiving a plurality of technical value evaluation applications from a plurality of supplier clients who have transmitted the technical value evaluation application, determines the order of performing evaluation of the plurality of technical value evaluation applications, Transmitting a technology valuation request for the application technology to the evaluator client;
(3) A plurality of evaluator clients, which have received the technical value evaluation request from the evaluation server, output the technology evaluation value requested by the technical supplier, and evaluate each technique evaluator associated with each evaluator client Inputting one evaluation value data to the evaluator client associated with the evaluation client, and transmitting the plurality of evaluation value data to the evaluation server;
(4) the evaluation server collecting and analyzing a plurality of technology evaluation value data input to a plurality of evaluator clients in the step (3) to determine a value for the technology for valuation evaluation, Determining a technical value range, which is distributed between a reference percentage and a maximum value of the number of response evaluators in the technical value distribution map of the evaluation value data, as a technical value range evaluated for the application technology;
(5) if the range of the technology value for the application technology is determined in the step (4), transmitting the value to the supplier client that transmitted the value evaluation application,
The evaluation value data that the technology evaluator inputs to the evaluator client associated with the technology evaluator in the step (3) includes at least the evaluation subject publishing unit input by the technology supplier and the technology value evaluating unit for writing the evaluation value by the technology evaluator,
In the step (4), if the evaluator client does not evaluate the senior technology first in accordance with the evaluation order determined in the step (2) among the plurality of evaluation target technologies presented to the technology evaluator associated therewith, So that it can not be done. delete delete The technology valuation method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of pre-selecting the technology evaluator by technology field, job field, or gender and registering the technology evaluator in the evaluation server. The technical value evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation server includes an evaluator database for managing an evaluation history of the evaluator. delete delete delete The technology valuation method according to claim 1, further comprising an evaluation history management step of managing an evaluation history. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the evaluation history management step further includes a step of paying or deducting a credit for the evaluator's evaluation integrity. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the evaluation history management step further includes deriving a potential technician as a person who sets the highest technological value among the technology supplier and the evaluator. delete The technical value evaluation method according to claim 11, further comprising a technology transaction matching step of storing the information of the potential technical customer and the technology provider determined in the evaluation history management step and managing the progress of the technical transaction.
delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete

Images