KR20190044300A - Apparatus and method for evaluating mock failure recovery training in a substations - Google Patents

Abstract

According to one embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus for assessing mock failure recovery training in a substation may comprise: a failure training setting module for setting a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure, and a rating for each evaluation item; a failure training evaluating module for selecting one of the failure types set in the failure training setting module to generate the failure, storing a training recovery procedure entered by an operation of a training center, and evaluating the training recovery procedure based on the standard recovery procedure and rating for each evaluation item to store a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score; and a failure training confirming module for selecting one of the failure types set in the failure training setting module and outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type.

Description

[0001] APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING MOCK FAILURE RECOVERY TRAINING IN A SUBSTATION [0002]

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation simulator.

As of the end of 2016, Korea's power system is composed of 827 substations (765kV 7, 345kV 111, 154kV 702, and 66kV 7 substations) nationwide and various causes such as natural disaster such as lightning strike, The failure is continuously generated.

For stable operation of this power system, it is essential to quickly and accurately repair the fault in case of substation failure. To this end, T & D operators need to establish a standard recovery procedure for each failure type and to conduct continuous failure recovery training.

Conventional substation failure recovery training methods are classified into group training and worker training. In the case of group training, training is conducted using a training program in a customized simulator training center for each substation under the presence of a lecturer. In case of worker training alone We use Excel-based fault recovery program to train the workplace.

In such a conventional substation failure recovery training method, there is a spatial and temporal restriction in the case of the training on the basis of the superficial training, and therefore, an instructor is necessarily required for the failure occurrence and the result evaluation. It takes a relatively long time, and it is difficult to manage the history of training results.

In addition, there is no spatial and temporal constraint in the case of excel-based solo training, but it is difficult to generate a new type of failure, the feasibility is low on the basis of Excel, the training institute is likely to cause a failure, It takes a long time, and there is a problem that it is difficult to manage the history of the training result.

In addition, conventional collective training and worker-only training can not be an objective evaluation because they are subjective evaluations of instructors, and there is also a problem that there is no training function for new employees.

Korean Patent No. 10-157832

An embodiment of the present invention is capable of automatically generating a simulation failure without an instructor, evaluating the result of simulation on a simulation failure, confirming the training history of the failure standard procedure and simulation failure after the completion of the training, The present invention provides an apparatus and method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation capable of performing training on a target.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a failure training setting module for setting a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure and a rating for each evaluation item; Selecting one of a plurality of types of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate a corresponding failure, storing a training recovery procedure input by a training source operation, A failure training assessment module that evaluates training recovery procedures and stores training evaluation results that include training scores; And a failure diagnosis confirmation module for selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure failure setting module and outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type; A failure recovery training evaluation apparatus for a substation simulation is proposed.

Wherein the failure training setting module includes: a failure type storage unit for storing the plurality of failure types; A restoration procedure storage unit for storing the standard restoration procedure for each of the plurality of types of failures and the score for each evaluation item; And a training instruction storage unit for storing training reference items input for each of the plurality of types of failures; . ≪ / RTI >

Wherein the failure training evaluation module comprises: a failure type generating unit for generating one of a plurality of failure types set in the failure-training setting module, generating a corresponding failure and outputting a failure event; A training restoration procedure storage unit for storing a training restoration procedure inputted by a training center operation on the generated failure; A training result evaluating unit for evaluating the training recovery procedure based on the standard restoration procedure and evaluation points and storing a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score; A training result output unit for outputting the training evaluation result and the training reference for the corresponding failure; And a history management unit for managing a history for each failure type including a result of a training evaluation for the corresponding failure; . ≪ / RTI >

Wherein the failure training confirmation module comprises: a failure type selection unit for selecting one of a plurality of failure types set in the failure training setup module; A training result output unit outputting a training evaluation result for the selected failure type in the failure type selection unit; And a standard recovery procedure output unit outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type in the failure type selection unit. . ≪ / RTI >

The training result evaluating unit may be configured to perform the steps of (1) isolating the fault section, (2) not performing the necessary operation, (3) not performing the operation for returning the relay- , (6) priority inadequacy, (7) power outage, and (8) recovery timeout.

The training result evaluating unit may be configured to perform the steps of (1) isolating the fault section, (2) not performing the necessary operation, (3) not performing the operation for returning the relay- (6) Priority inadequate, (7) Power outage occurred, and (8) Recovery time exceeded can be evaluated in parallel.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation method applied to an apparatus for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation model, the method comprising: setting a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure, and a score for each evaluation item; Selecting one of a plurality of types of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate a corresponding failure, storing a training recovery procedure input by a training source operation, A failure training assessment step of evaluating a training recovery procedure and storing a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score; And a failure training checking step of selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setting module and outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type; A method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation is proposed.

The fault training setting step may include: storing the plurality of fault types; Storing a plurality of standard recovery procedures for each type of failure and a score for each evaluation item; And storing training notes entered for each of the plurality of types of failures; . ≪ / RTI >

The failure training evaluation step may include: selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate the failure and outputting a failure event; Storing a training recovery procedure inputted by a training source operation for the generated failure; Evaluating the training restoration procedure based on the standard restoration procedure and the points of each evaluation item, and storing a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score; Outputting the training evaluation result and the training reference for the corresponding failure; And managing a history of each failure type including a result of a training evaluation for the corresponding failure; . ≪ / RTI >

Wherein the failure training confirmation step comprises: selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure-training setting module; Outputting a training evaluation result for the selected type of failure, if any; And outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type; . ≪ / RTI >

The plurality of evaluation items are classified into (1) non-fault section isolation, (2) non-essential operation, (3) non-operation of returning to the lock- (7) power outage, and (8) recovery timeout.

(2) the required operation is not performed, (3) the lock-out relay return operation is not performed, (4) the unnecessary operation is performed, (5) the interlock The violation can be evaluated in a sequential manner and evaluated in parallel with respect to the above (1) failure isolation, (6) inadequate priority, (7) power outage, and (8) recovery timeout.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to shorten the power failure time by enhancing the capability of restoring power system operators. For example, it is possible to constantly train, shorten the time required for training, and concentrate on recovery training, and it is possible to strengthen vulnerability analysis and intensive training through automatic evaluation and history management of training results, thereby enhancing recovery capability.

In addition, it is possible to reduce education and training budget by eliminating the need for lecturers during breakdown recovery training. For example, education and training are being carried out every 3 weeks by the operation of training and training group according to the establishment of the wide-area operation center. In the case of shift workers, And instructors can be dramatically reduced.

In addition, there is an advantage that it is possible to utilize a tool for quantifying a failure recovery capability. For example, the North American Power System Reliability Management Organization (NERC) operates a power system professional qualification system. When introducing a power system operator qualification system for stable power system operation, this objective program can be used as a tool for quantifying fault recovery capability. In addition, it can be used as a practical tool for evaluating the performance of a substation operation technology contest held every year, which is advantageous in that objectivity to the evaluation result can be secured and all the organizers can train and evaluate at the same time.

In short, because there is no spatial and time constraint and no instructor is required, the training time can be shortened because the training is always possible, and there is no time required for automatic fault generation and evaluation, and the training result can be automatically evaluated. It is possible to perform the vulnerability concentration training because it can manage the history of the training result and it is possible to introduce the training mode (Tutorial mode).

1 is a block diagram of a configuration block of a failure recovery recovery training apparatus of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a detailed block diagram of an apparatus for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is an exemplary view illustrating a method of evaluating failure recovery training of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG.
4 is an exemplary view illustrating an evaluation process for a plurality of evaluation items according to an embodiment of the present invention.

It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described and that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

In addition, in each embodiment of the present invention, the structure, shape, and numerical values described as an example are merely examples for helping understanding of the technical matters of the present invention, so that the spirit and scope of the present invention are not limited thereto. It should be understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. The embodiments of the present invention may be combined with one another to form various new embodiments.

In the drawings referred to in the present invention, components having substantially the same configuration and function as those of the present invention will be denoted by the same reference numerals.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art can easily carry out the present invention.

1 is a block diagram of a configuration block of a failure recovery recovery training apparatus of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, an apparatus for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a failure training setting module 100, a failure training evaluation module 200, and a failure training confirmation module 300 have.

The failure training setting module 100 can set a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure, and a rating point for each evaluation item.

The failure training evaluation module 200 selects one failure type among a plurality of failure types set in the failure training setting module 100 to generate a corresponding failure, stores a training recovery procedure input by a training operator operation, The training recovery procedure may be evaluated based on the standard restoration procedure and the evaluation items, and the training evaluation result including the training evaluation score may be stored.

The failure training confirmation module 300 may select one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setup module 100 and output a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type.

For each figure of the present invention, possible unnecessary redundant explanations can be omitted for the same reference numerals and components having the same function, and possible differences for each figure can be explained.

2 is a detailed block diagram of an apparatus for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, the failure training setup module 100 may include a failure type storage unit 110, a recovery procedure storage unit 120, and a training instruction storage unit 130.

The failure type storage unit 110 may store the plurality of failure types. For example, the fault type storage unit 110 may store a fault event and a name, such as a transmission line, a bus, a transformer, a distribution line, etc., in addition to a conventional custom simulator.

The recovery procedure storage unit 120 may store the standard recovery procedure for each of the plurality of types of failure and the score of each evaluation item. For example, the recovery procedure storage unit 120 may store the details of the failure type stored in the failure type storage unit 110 in accordance with the standard recovery procedure directly by the instructor, such as a mandatory operation, a fault section separation operation, a Lock -Out Ry (86B1, 86B2, 86T, 51SN, etc.) Reset operation, power outage during standard operation to find the fault section, operation procedure, etc. For example, if only the operation of separating the failure section and the operation procedure are manually specified, the rest can be automatically classified and stored.

The training instruction storage unit 130 may store training reference items input for each of the plurality of types of failures. The training instruction storage unit 130 can input and store a failure determination method, a restoration instruction, and an actual failure case that the training center can refer to during training.

The failure training evaluation module 200 includes a failure type generating unit 210, a training recovery procedure storage unit 220, a training result evaluation unit 230, a training result output unit 240, and a history management unit 250 .

The failure type generating unit 210 may select one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure-training setting module 100 to generate a corresponding failure and output a failure event.

For example, the failure type generating unit 210 may generate an arbitrary failure among the plurality of failure types stored in the failure type storage unit 110, sequentially generate a failure, select a specific failure Thereby generating a failure.

The training recovery procedure storage unit 220 may store the training recovery procedure that is input by the training source operation for the generated failure.

For example, the training recovery procedure storage unit 220 may sequentially receive operation history of the training source for the selected failure to evaluate the training results for the selected failure.

The training result evaluating unit 230 may evaluate the training recovery procedure based on the standard restoration procedure and the evaluation items, and store the training evaluation result including the training evaluation score.

For example, the training result evaluation unit 230 compares the standard recovery procedure stored in the standard recovery procedure storage unit 120 with the training recovery procedure stored in the training recovery procedure storage unit 220 for the selected failure The score of the evaluation items can be modified by a score of 100 out of 100 according to the scoring criteria for the plurality of evaluation items included in the training recovery procedure.

The training result output unit 240 may output the training evaluation result and the training reference for the corresponding failure.

The history management unit 250 can manage the history of each failure type including the result of the training evaluation for the corresponding failure.

For example, the history management unit 250 may record training-related information such as a training date, a failure type, a training source, a score, an operation history, and the like to manage past records at any time.

The failure training confirmation module 300 may include a failure type selection unit 310, a training result output unit 320, and a standard recovery procedure output unit 330.

The failure type selection unit 310 can select one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure-failure setting module 100. [

The training result output unit 320 may output the training evaluation result when there is a training evaluation result for the selected failure type in the failure type selection unit 310. [

For example, the training result output unit 320 expresses the grading points and total points of the grading items of the training result evaluating unit 230, compares the standard restoring procedure with the training restoring procedure, And you can print out your ideas during recovery operations.

The standard recovery procedure output unit 330 may output a standard recovery procedure for the failure type selected by the failure type selection unit 310. [

For example, the standard recovery procedure output unit 330 may sequentially output the standard recovery procedures stored in the standard recovery procedure storage unit 120 so that a new employee using the training mode can perform operations according to guidance . At this time, the standard recovery procedure can be sequentially output in response to the input of the new employee.

For example, the training result evaluating unit 230 may judge whether or not the following items (1), (2), (3) Unnecessary operation, (5) interlock violation, (6) improper priority, (7) power outage, and (8) recovery timeout.

For example, the training result evaluating unit 230 may classify the plurality of evaluation items into (1) failure division not yet performed, (2) mandatory operation not performed, (3) non-operation of returning to a lock-out relay, , (5) Interlock violations can be assessed sequentially, and (6) priority inadequacy, (7) power outage, and (8) recovery time out can be assessed in parallel have.

Hereinafter, a method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation model will be described with reference to Figs. 3 to 11. Fig. In the present application, explanations of the substation simulation repair training evaluation device and the description of the substation simulation repair training evaluation method can be complementary to each other, unless otherwise specified. That is, the explanation of the method described with reference to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 can be applied to the description of the method, so that, in the description of the method of evaluating the failure recovery training of the substation model, possible redundant detailed description may be omitted.

FIG. 3 is an exemplary view illustrating a method of evaluating failure recovery training of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG.

Referring to FIG. 3, the method for evaluating the failure recovery training of a substation according to an embodiment of the present invention can be applied to a failure recovery training evaluation apparatus of a substation simulation, which includes a failure training setting step S100, ), And a failure training confirmation step (S300).

In the failure training setting step (S100), a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure, and a rating by evaluation item may be set. For example, the failure training setting step (S100) may be performed by the failure training setting module (100).

For example, in the failure training setting step S100, the plurality of failure types may be stored (S110), the standard recovery procedure for each of the plurality of failure types, and the score for each evaluation item may be stored (S120) The input training reference may be stored for each of the plurality of types of failure (S130).

In the failure training evaluation step (S200), one failure type among a plurality of failure types set in the failure training setup module (100) is selected to generate a corresponding failure, a training recovery procedure input by the training operator operation is stored, The training recovery procedure may be evaluated based on the standard recovery procedure and the score of each evaluation item, and the training evaluation result including the training evaluation score may be stored. For example, the failure training evaluation step (S200) may be performed by the failure training evaluation module (200).

For example, in the failure training evaluation step (S200), one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setting module 100 is selected, the corresponding failure is generated, and a failure event is output (S210) (S220), the training recovery procedure may be stored based on the standard restoration procedure and the score of the evaluation item, and the training recovery procedure may be evaluated The training evaluation result may be stored (S230), and the training evaluation result and the training reference for the corresponding failure may be output (S240). The history of the failure type, including the training evaluation result for the corresponding failure, (S250).

In the failure training confirmation step S300, one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setup module 100 is selected, and a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type may be output. For example, the failure training confirmation step (S300) may be performed by the failure training confirmation module (300).

For example, in the failure training confirmation step (S300), one failure type among a plurality of failure types set in the failure failure setting module 100 may be selected (S310), and a training evaluation result for the selected failure type If so, the training evaluation result may be output (S320) and a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type may be output (S330).

4 is an exemplary view illustrating an evaluation process for a plurality of evaluation items according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 4, the plurality of evaluation items include (1) non-fault section isolation, (2) mandatory operation not performed, (3) non-operation of returning to the lock-out relay, (4) unnecessary operation, , (6) priority inadequacy, (7) power outage, and (8) recovery timeout.

(2) a mandatory operation is not performed, (3) a lock-out relay return operation is missed, (4) an unnecessary operation is performed, (2) 5) Evaluation of the interlock violation can be performed sequentially, and evaluation of the above (1) non-fault section isolation, (6) priority inadequacy, (7) power outage, and (8) Can be performed.

For example, the detailed evaluation method and basic score for each of the plurality of evaluation items may be as shown in Table 1 above.

The detailed evaluation method and basic score for each of the plurality of evaluation items shown in Table 1 are merely illustrative, and the present invention is not limited thereto.

The failure training setting module 100, the failure training evaluation module 200 and the failure training confirmation module 300 according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a processor (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU) (E.g., GPUs), microprocessors, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.), memory (e.g., volatile memory Such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a voice input device, a touch input device, an infrared camera, a video input device, etc.), an output device (such as a display, Speakers, printers, etc.) and communication connections (e.g., modems, network interface cards (NICs), integrated network interfaces, radio frequency transmitters / receivers, infrared ports, USB connections, Connection may be implemented in the computing environment (PCI), USB, firmware (IEEE 1394), an optical bus architecture, network, etc.).

The computing environment may be a personal computer, a server computer, a handheld or laptop device, a mobile device (mobile phone, PDA, media player, etc.), a multiprocessor system, a consumer electronics device, a minicomputer, A distributed computing environment including devices, and the like, but is not limited thereto.

While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Anyone can make various variations.

100: Failure training setting module
200: Failure training evaluation module
300: Failure training confirmation module
110: Fault type storage unit
120: Recovery procedure storage unit
130: training instruction storage unit
210: Fault type generator
220: training recovery procedure storage unit
230: Training result evaluation unit
240: training result output unit
250:
310: Fault type selection unit
320: Training result output section
330: Standard recovery procedure output unit

Claims (12)

A failure training setting module for setting a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure, and a rating for each evaluation item;
Selecting one of a plurality of types of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate a corresponding failure, storing a training recovery procedure input by a training source operation, A failure training assessment module that evaluates training recovery procedures and stores training evaluation results that include training scores; And
A failure training confirmation module for selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setting module and outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type;
A substation simulated failure recovery training evaluation device.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the failure training setup module
A failure type storage unit for storing the plurality of failure types;
A restoration procedure storage unit for storing the standard restoration procedure for each of the plurality of types of failures and the score for each evaluation item; And
A training instruction storage unit for storing training reference items input for each of the plurality of failure types;
A substation simulated failure recovery training evaluation device.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the failure training evaluation module
A failure type generating unit for selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate a corresponding failure and outputting a failure event;
A training restoration procedure storage unit for storing a training restoration procedure inputted by a training center operation on the generated failure;
A training result evaluating unit for evaluating the training recovery procedure based on the standard restoration procedure and evaluation points and storing a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score;
A training result output unit for outputting the training evaluation result and the training reference for the corresponding failure; And
A history management unit for managing the history of each failure type including the result of the training evaluation for the corresponding failure;
A substation simulated failure recovery training evaluation device.
The method of claim 1, wherein the failure training verification module
A failure type selection unit for selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setting module;
A training result output unit outputting a training evaluation result for the selected failure type in the failure type selection unit; And
A standard recovery procedure output unit outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected fault type in the fault type selection unit;
A substation simulated failure recovery training evaluation device.
4. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the training result evaluating unit
(2) the required operation is not performed, (3) the lock-out relay reset operation is missed, (4) the unnecessary operation, (5) the interlock violation, (6) (7) power outage, and (8) recovery timeout.
6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the training result evaluating unit
(3) a lock-out relay reset operation is unavailable, (4) an unnecessary operation, and (5) an interlock violation are sequentially evaluated with respect to the plurality of evaluation items ,
(6) Priority inadequacy, (7) Outage of power failure, and (8) Recovery time exceeded are evaluated in parallel
Substation Mock Failure Recovery Training Evaluation Device.
In an evaluation method applied to a failure recovery recovery evaluation apparatus of a substation simulation,
A failure training setting step of setting a plurality of failure types, a standard recovery procedure, and a rating for each evaluation item;
Selecting one of a plurality of types of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate a corresponding failure, storing a training recovery procedure input by a training source operation, A failure training assessment step of evaluating a training recovery procedure and storing a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score; And
A failure training confirmation step of selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure training setting module and outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type;
A method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation including a substation.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the fault-
Storing the plurality of fault types;
Storing a plurality of standard recovery procedures for each type of failure and a score for each evaluation item; And
Storing training reference entries entered for each of the plurality of types of failures;
A method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation including a substation.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the failure training evaluation step
Selecting one of the plurality of failure types set in the failure-training setting module to generate a corresponding failure and outputting a failure event;
Storing a training recovery procedure inputted by a training source operation for the generated failure;
Evaluating the training restoration procedure based on the standard restoration procedure and the points of each evaluation item, and storing a training evaluation result including a training evaluation score;
Outputting the training evaluation result and the training reference for the corresponding failure; And
Managing a history for each failure type including a result of the training evaluation for the corresponding failure;
A method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation including a substation.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the failure training verification step
Selecting one of the plurality of fault types set in the fault-training setting module;
Outputting a training evaluation result for the selected type of failure, if any; And
Outputting a standard recovery procedure for the selected failure type;
A method for evaluating failure recovery training of a substation including a substation.
The method according to claim 9,
(4) Unnecessary operation, (5) Interlock violation, (6) Priority inadequate, (7) Power outage occurred. , And (8) Substation repair failure recovery training method including recovery timeout.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the failure training assessment step
(3) a lock-out relay reset operation is unavailable, (4) an unnecessary operation, and (5) an interlock violation are sequentially evaluated with respect to the plurality of evaluation items ,
(6) Priority inadequacy, (7) Outage of power failure, and (8) Recovery time exceeded are evaluated in parallel
Evaluation method of failure recovery training of substation mock.

Images