KR20170127569A - Program diagnostic device, program diagnostic method, and program diagnostic program - Google Patents
Program diagnostic device, program diagnostic method, and program diagnostic program Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20170127569A KR20170127569A KR1020177031427A KR20177031427A KR20170127569A KR 20170127569 A KR20170127569 A KR 20170127569A KR 1020177031427 A KR1020177031427 A KR 1020177031427A KR 20177031427 A KR20177031427 A KR 20177031427A KR 20170127569 A KR20170127569 A KR 20170127569A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- command
- search
- condition
- control program
- unit
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/05—Programmable logic controllers, e.g. simulating logic interconnections of signals according to ladder diagrams or function charts
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0267—Fault communication, e.g. human machine interface [HMI]
- G05B23/0272—Presentation of monitored results, e.g. selection of status reports to be displayed; Filtering information to the user
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/10—Plc systems
- G05B2219/14—Plc safety
- G05B2219/14112—Diagnostic, troubleshooting
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Programmable Controllers (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
Abstract
A control program including an operation command and a conditional instruction; command specification data including a command name of the command, a type of the command, and contents of processing of the command; and search result data in which the result of the search executed for the control program is stored A variable setting unit for setting a target variable, an operation command having a possibility that the value of the target variable may change, a target variable name, a command name of the retrieved operation command, a type of command, An operation search unit for searching for a conditional command for determining a condition for executing an operation command, a variable name of an argument of the retrieved conditional command, a command name of the conditional command, a type of command, A condition search unit for writing the search result data into the search result data and setting an argument of the conditional command as a new target variable; The primary search execution determination section, and provided with a list display list to display the contents of the search result data to.
Description
The present invention relates to a program diagnostic apparatus for diagnosing a control program, a program diagnostic method, and a program diagnostic program.
In a control system for controlling a machine in the field of factory automation (FA), a control program is described in a programming language. The programming language is ladder (LD) language or structured text (ST) language (IEC 61131-3, JIS B 3503: 2012).
The control program includes commands and variables. In the case where the value of a certain variable in the control program is different from the assumed value, the following operation has been performed manually to investigate the cause thereof.
The first operation is an operation to go back to the control program and examine the points and conditions that are likely to change the value of the target variable.
The second operation is an operation for simulating the control program to reproduce that the condition is satisfied at the point irradiated in the first operation.
The third operation is an operation of going back to the control program and examining the point and condition satisfying the condition reproduced in the second operation.
Thereafter, the second operation and the third operation were repeated to find the root cause.
However, since it is time and effort to go back and examine the control program manually, it was difficult to specify the cause of the difference of the value of the variable from the assumed value.
As a related art, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2001-34870 discloses a technique in which, when an output signal is detected as an abnormal contact, the ladder program is returned from the output signal to the previous step, A ladder program diagnostic method is disclosed (paragraph 0053).
In the following
In the following
However, in the techniques described in
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the above, and an object of the present invention is to obtain a program diagnostic apparatus which enables a user to easily grasp the overall shape of a problem.
In order to solve the above-described problems and to achieve the object, the present invention is characterized by comprising: a control program including an operation command for changing a value of an argument and a condition command for determining a condition for executing an operation command; The instruction specification data including the instruction name of the instruction, the type of the operation instruction or the condition instruction, and the content of the instruction process, and the search result data in which the result of the search executed for the control program is stored And a storage unit. The present invention includes a variable setting unit for setting a target variable, an operation command for which a value of a target variable is likely to change is searched in a control program, a target variable name and a searched operation An operation retrieval unit that writes the command name of the command, the type of the command, and the contents of the processing into the retrieval result data; and a conditional command that determines a condition for executing the operation command retrieved by the operation retrieval unit, And the command specification data, writes the variable name of the argument of the retrieved condition command, the command name of the retrieved condition command, the type of command and the contents of the processing to the retrieval result data, and sets the argument of the retrieved condition command as a new target variable A search condition determining unit for determining whether or not to search for a search result, And a list display unit for displaying a list of contents of the data.
The program diagnostic apparatus according to the present invention achieves the effect that the user can easily grasp the overall shape of the problem.
1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a control system according to a first embodiment.
2 is a diagram showing the hardware configuration of the control apparatus according to the first embodiment.
3 is a diagram showing the hardware configuration of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
4 is a functional block diagram of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
5 is a diagram showing command specification data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
6 is a diagram showing search frequency data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
7 is a diagram showing search range data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
8 is a diagram showing search result data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
9 is a diagram showing a project data creation screen of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
10 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
11 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
12 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
13 is a diagram showing a program diagnostic screen of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
14 is a diagram for explaining a search process of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
15 is a diagram for explaining search processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
16 is a diagram for explaining the search processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
17 is a diagram showing a program diagnostic screen of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
18 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
19 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
Hereinafter, a program diagnostic apparatus, a program diagnostic method, and a program diagnostic program according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The present invention is not limited to these embodiments.
1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a control system according to
The
2 is a diagram showing the hardware configuration of the control apparatus according to the first embodiment. The
The main board 3a includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 3a1, a memory 3a2 as a RAM (Random Access Memory), a communication interface 3a3, a bus interface 3a4, and a storage unit 3a5 . The CPU 3a1, the memory 3a2, the communication interface 3a3, the bus interface 3a4, and the storage unit 3a5 are connected via the internal bus B1.
The communication interface 3a3 communicates with the
The bus interface 3a4 is a bus bridge circuit that connects the internal bus B1 and the expansion bus B2. The
The storage unit 3a5 stores the
The
The control program 24a1 includes a MAIN program 24a1a and a SUB (sub) program 24a1b. In
In the memory 3a2, a plurality of devices defined by the device memory 24a3 are secured. In
3 is a diagram showing the hardware configuration of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The
The
The input unit 25 accepts an operation input from the user. The input unit 25 may be a keyboard or a mouse. The display section 26 displays characters and images. The display section 26 is a liquid crystal display device. The
4 is a functional block diagram of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The
The
The
In the first embodiment, the control program 24a1 is described in a ladder language. Therefore, the
5 is a diagram showing command specification data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The
A row 51 of the
The description of the operation of the " LD " command is described in the description of the line 51 item. Quot; # 1 is ON " is described in the item of description of the line 51 since the " LD " command is an instruction to determine whether or not the first argument is ON (ON).
The data type of the first argument of the " LD " instruction is described in the column of the note in the row 51. [ Since the first argument of the " LD " instruction is of bit type, a note "bit variable" is described in the column of the note in the row 51. [
A row 52 of the
The description of the operation of the " OUT " command is described in the explanation of the line 52. Since the " OUT " command is an instruction to turn on the first argument, the comment statement " ON # 1 "
The data type of the first argument of the " OUT " command is described in the column of the note in the row 52. [ Since the first argument of the " OUT " command is of the bit type, the note item of the row 52 describes the note " bit variable ".
A row 53 of the
The description of the operation of the "=" command is described in the description of the line 53 item. Since the command "=" is an instruction to judge whether the first argument and the second argument are the same, the comment statement "# 1 is the same as # 2" is described in the description line item of the line 53.
The data type of the first argument and the second argument of the " = " command are described in the column of the note in the line 53. [ Since the first argument and the second argument of the " = " command are of the word type, a remarks " word variable "
A row 54 of the
The description of the operation of the "MOV" command is described in the description of the line 54. Since the "MOV" command is a command for transferring the value of the first argument to the second argument, the comment statement "# 1 is sent to # 2" is described in the description of the line 54.
The data type of the first argument and the second argument of the " MOV " command is described in the column of the note in the line 54. [ Since the first argument and the second argument of the " MOV " command are of the word type, the word "word variable" is described in the column of the note in the line 54.
5 shows four rows 51, 52, 53 and 54 for four instructions. In practice, however, the
Referring again to FIG. 4, the
6 is a diagram showing search frequency data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. &Quot; 10 " is described in the search count data 24c1. As a result, the search executed for the
7 is a diagram showing search range data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The search range data 24c2 includes an item of the range leading step number and an item of the range end step number. &Quot; 1 " is described in the item of the range leading step number. &Quot; 100 " is described in the item of the step end step number. Thus, the search performed for the control program 24a1 is limited to the range from the step No. 1 to the step No. 100, and is terminated when the range is out of the range.
Referring again to FIG. 4, the
8 is a diagram showing search result data of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The
The
Referring again to FIG. 4, the
The
The
The project data creating unit 21a1 creates the
9 is a diagram showing a project data creation screen of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The project data creating unit 21a1 displays the project
The project
The MAIN program 24a1a includes
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
Referring again to FIG. 4, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 includes a variable setting unit 21a2a for setting a target variable. The variable setting unit 21a2a can receive the variable input by the user into the input unit 25 and set it as a target variable. In addition, the variable setting unit 21a2a can receive the variable in question from the
The program diagnosis unit 21a2 searches the control program 24a1 for an operation command that may change the value of the target variable, collates the retrieved operation command with the
The program diagnosis unit 21a2 searches the control program 24a1 for a conditional command for determining a condition for executing the operation command retrieved from the operation retrieving unit 21a2b, collates the retrieved conditional command with the
The program diagnosis unit 21a2 includes a search determination unit 21a2d that causes the operation search unit 21a2b and the condition search unit 21a2c to execute the search again.
The program diagnosis unit 21a2 includes a list display unit 21a2e for listing the contents of the
The program diagnosis unit 21a2 scans the memory 3a2 of the
The predetermined timing is as follows.
The first example is a constant time lapse. For a given time, one second is exemplified. As a result, the values of all the variables are stored in the
The second example is when the
The third example is when the user inputs an instruction to execute the scan to the input unit 25. As a result, values of all variables at the timing desired by the user are accumulated in the
10 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
The scanning unit 21a2f executes the processing shown in Fig. 10 at a predetermined timing.
In step S10, the scanning unit 21a2f scans the memory 3a2 of the
In step S12, the scanning unit 21a2f writes the values of all the variables obtained in step S10 into the
Referring again to FIG. 4, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 calculates the values of all variables used in the control program 24a1 by executing the control program 24a1 by simulation, and writes the values of the variables in the
As a result, the values of all the variables used in the control program 24a1 are stored in the
11 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
The simulation unit 21a2g executes the process shown in Fig. 11 when the user inputs an instruction to execute the simulation on the input unit 25. Fig.
The simulation unit 21a2g calculates the values of all the variables used in the control program 24a1 by executing the control program 24a1 by simulation in step S20.
In step S22, the simulation unit 21a2g writes the values of all the variables calculated in step S20 into the
12 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
The variable setting unit 21a2a sets the target variable in step S100.
13 is a diagram showing a program diagnostic screen of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The variable setting unit 21a2a displays the
The program
The variable setting unit 21a2a can receive the variable input by the user into the input unit 25 and set it to the
Referring again to Fig. 12, the motion search section 21a2b searches the control program 24a1 for the motion command described in the argument in the target variable 72 in step S102.
The operation retrieving unit 21a2b can retrieve an operation command from the control program 24a1 by obtaining the command type of the command by collating the command in the control program 24a1 with the
The search result by the motion search section 21a2b may be a plurality of points.
14 is a diagram for explaining a search process of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
In Fig. 14, the values described at the bottom of each variable are the values of the respective variables at any timing, and are the values stored in the
Assuming that the program diagnostic unit 21a2 uses the values of all scanned variables when it receives a notification of the occurrence of a problem from the
Assuming that the program diagnostic unit 21a2 uses the values of all the variables in the former time than when the notification of the occurrence of the problem is received from the
The variable " D20 " set to the
The motion search section 21a2b finds that the variable "D20" set in the
The operation retrieving unit 21a2b may also obtain the operation command by graphically analyzing the control program 24a1 instead of checking the command name and the
Specifically, when two instructions are described in one row, as in the
When more than two instructions are described in one row, as in the
Thereby, the motion search section 21a2b can search for the motion command from the control program 24a1 without collating the command name and the
Referring again to Fig. 12, in step S104, the motion search section 21a2b searches among the motion commands searched in step S102 for motion commands likely to change the value of the target variable.
The variable " D20 " set to the
Therefore, the operation retrieving unit 21a2b can search the control program 24a1 for the
In step S106, the motion search unit 21a2b collates the motion command searched in step S104 with the
Referring back to Fig. 8, the motion search section 21a2b creates a row (61) in step S106. The operation retrieving unit 21a2b writes the variable name "D20", the command name "MOV" and the command type "operation" in the items (24d1, 24d2, and 24d3)
The operation retrieving unit 21a2b collates the
The operation retrieving unit 21a2b writes the program name " MAIN " including the
The
Referring again to Fig. 12, the condition retrieval unit 21a2c retrieves, from the control program 24a1, a conditional command for determining a condition for executing the operation command retrieved by the operation retrieval unit 21a2b in step S108 .
The condition retrieval unit 21a2c can retrieve the conditional instruction from the control program 24a1 by collating the instruction in the control program 24a1 with the
The search result by the condition searching unit 21a2c may be a plurality of points.
Further, the condition retrieving unit 21a2c may acquire the operation command by graphically analyzing the control program 24a1 instead of checking the command name and the
Concretely, when two instructions are described in one row, as in the
When more than two instructions are described in one row, as in the
Thereby, the condition retrieving unit 21a2c can retrieve the conditional instruction from the control program 24a1 without collating the instruction name and the
Referring again to Fig. 14, a
Therefore, the condition searching unit 21a2c can search the control program 24a1 for the
12, the condition retrieval unit 21a2c collates the conditional command retrieved in step S108 with the
Referring back to Fig. 8, the condition retrieval unit 21a2c creates a
The condition retrieval unit 21a2c collates the
The condition retrieving unit 21a2c writes the program name " MAIN " including the
The
Referring again to FIG. 12, the condition retrieval unit 21a2c sets the argument of the conditional command retrieved in step S110 as a new target variable 72 in step S112.
A plurality of
15 is a diagram for explaining search processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
As shown in Fig. 15, the
Referring again to Fig. 12, the search judgment unit 21a2d judges whether or not the search end condition is satisfied in step S114. The search termination conditions are as follows.
The first example is a case where a new target variable 72 is not set in step S112. That is, the control program 24a1 can not go back more than that.
The second example is the case where the number of repetitions of retrieval from step S102 to step S112 by the operation retrieval section 21a2b and the condition retrieval section 21a2c reaches the number of times described in the retrieval number data 24c1.
Thereby, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect that it is possible to prevent the search from being terminated and to ensure that the search is stopped, that is, to ensure the stopping of the search. The program diagnosis unit 21a2 can limit the search range even when the scale of the control program 24a1 is large so that the effect of suppressing the number of steps for specifying the cause of the problem of the control program 24a1 .
The third example is the case where the new target variable 72 set in step S112 by the condition searching unit 21a2c is out of the range of the step number described in the search range data 24c2.
Thereby, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect that the stoppability of retrieval is ensured. The program diagnosis unit 21a2 can limit the search range even when the control program 24a1 has a large scale, and thus can reduce the number of steps for specifying the cause of the problem of the control program 24a1 .
The search determination unit 21a2d can determine the OR (logical sum) of a plurality of search termination conditions.
If the search condition determining unit 21a2d determines in step S114 that the search condition is not satisfied (No), the process proceeds to step S102.
16 is a diagram for explaining the search processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
As shown in Fig. 16, the
The motion search section 21a2b finds that the variable "D10" set in the
Referring back to Fig. 8, the motion search section 21a2b creates a row (63) in step S106. The operation retrieving unit 21a2b writes the variable name "D0", the command name "MOV" and the command type "operation" in the items (24d1, 24d2 and 24d3) of the row (63).
The operation retrieving unit 21a2b collates the
The operation retrieving unit 21a2b writes the program name " MAIN " including the
The
On the left side of the
Therefore, the condition searching unit 21a2c can search the control program 24a1 for the
In step S110, the condition retrieval unit 21a2c collates the conditional command retrieved in step S108 with the
Referring back to Fig. 8, the condition retrieving unit 21a2c creates a
The condition retrieval unit 21a2c collates the
The condition retrieving unit 21a2c writes the program name " MAIN " including the
The
The
Referring again to Fig. 12, if the search condition determining unit 21a2d determines in step S114 that the search condition is satisfied (Yes), the process proceeds to step S116.
Referring again to Fig. 16, an operation command including the target variable 72 " M100 " is not present in the control program 24a1.
Therefore, the search determination unit 21a2d determines that the search condition is satisfied in step S114 (Yes), and proceeds to step S116.
Referring again to Fig. 12, the list display section 21a2e displays the content of the
17 is a diagram showing a program diagnostic screen of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment. The list display section 21a2e displays a list of the contents of the
The
The list display section 21a2e displays the contents of the
In this manner, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 not only displays the contents of the command causing the problem and the contents of the command in which the problem has occurred, which are displayed in the
Thereby, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect that the user can easily grasp the overall shape between the command causing the problem and the command in which the problem has occurred.
18 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
The list display unit 21a2e displays the
Thereby, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect that the user can immediately check the desired command.
The
19 is a flowchart showing the processing of the engineering tool according to the first embodiment.
The list display unit 21a2e displays a list of the filter conditions entered in the filter
Thereby, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect that the user can reduce the number of steps for specifying the cause of the problem by narrowing the range of the command related to the problem.
Also, the operation retrieving unit 21a2b can obtain the instruction type "operation" of the instruction name by collating the instruction name and the
Thereby, the motion search section 21a2b can search for the motion command from the control program 24a1.
The condition retrieval unit 21a2c can obtain the command type "condition" of the command name by collating the command name with the
Thereby, the condition retrieval unit 21a2c can retrieve the conditional instruction from the control program 24a1.
The
Thereby, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect that the stoppability of retrieval is ensured. In addition, the search determination unit 21a2d can limit the search range even when the control program 24a1 has a large scale. Therefore, the program diagnosis unit 21a2 achieves the effect of suppressing the number of steps for specifying the cause of the problem of the control program 24a1.
The
The scanning unit 21a2f scans the memory 3a2 of the
Thus, if the program diagnosis unit 21a2 uses the values of all the scanned variables when it receives a notification of the occurrence of a problem from the
If the program diagnosis unit 21a2 uses all the values of the variables in the former than the time when the notice of the occurrence of the problem is received from the
The simulation unit 21a2g calculates the values of all the variables used in the control program 24a1 by executing the control program 24a1 by simulation and writes the values of the variables in the
Thereby, the program diagnosis section 21a2 can diagnose the problem of the control program 24a1 without operating the
The configuration shown in the above embodiments represents one example of the content of the present invention and can be combined with other known technologies and a part of the configuration can be omitted or changed without departing from the gist of the present invention Do.
1: Control system 2: Engineering tool
3:
21: CPU 21a1: Project data creation unit
21a2: Program diagnosis section 21a2a: Variable setting section
21a2b: motion search unit 21a2c: condition search unit
21a2d: search judgment unit 21a2e: list display unit
21a2f: Scan section 21a2g: Simulation section
24:
24a1:
24c: search
24e: Execution data
Claims (10)
A variable setting unit for setting a target variable,
Searching the control program for the operation command which is likely to change the value of the target variable, verifying the retrieved operation command with the command specification data, and comparing the target variable name and the command name of the retrieved operation command, An operation search unit for writing the contents of the type and the process into the search result data,
Searching the control program for a condition command for determining a condition for executing the operation command retrieved by the operation retrieving unit, collating the retrieved condition command with the command specification data, A condition search unit that writes the command name, the command type, and the process contents of the conditional command searched in the search result data, and sets an argument of the searched conditional command as a new target variable;
A search determination unit that causes the operation search unit and the condition search unit to execute the search again,
And a list display unit for displaying a list of the contents of the search result data.
Wherein the operation searching unit searches the control program for the operation command by collating the command in the control program with the command specification data to acquire the command type of the command.
Wherein the condition searching unit searches the control program for the condition command by collating an instruction in the control program with the instruction specification data to acquire the instruction type of the instruction.
Wherein the storage unit further stores search termination condition data describing an end condition of search executed for the control program,
Wherein the search and determination unit terminates the search by the operation search unit and the condition search unit when it is determined that the search performed by the operation search unit and the condition search unit satisfies the end condition, And a program diagnostic apparatus for executing a search in the operation search section and the condition search section again when it is determined that the search executed by the condition search section does not satisfy the termination condition.
Wherein the search termination condition data is data of the number of searches by the operation search unit and the condition search unit or data of a search range of the control program.
Wherein the list display unit displays a list of contents of data matching the filter condition among the search result data when a variable name or a command name of a searched condition command, a command type, Program diagnostic device.
Wherein the storage further stores execution data in which values at predetermined timings of all variables used in the control program are stored,
Further comprising a scan unit that scans a memory of a control device that executes the control program to acquire values of all variables used in the control program and write the values of the variables in the execution data at the predetermined timing Program diagnostic device.
Further comprising a simulation unit for calculating the value of all variables used in said control program by executing said control program by simulation and writing said value to said execution data.
A variable setting step of setting a target variable,
Searching the control program for the operation command which is likely to change the value of the target variable, verifying the retrieved operation command with the command specification data, and comparing the target variable name and the command name of the retrieved operation command, Type and processing contents into the search result data;
Searching the control program for a condition instruction for determining a condition for executing the operation command retrieved in the operation retrieving step, collating the retrieved condition command with the command specification data, A condition search step of writing the command name, the type of command and the contents of the search of the retrieved conditional command into the retrieval result data, and setting an argument of the retrieved conditional command as a new target variable;
A search determining step of performing the search again in the operation searching step and the condition searching step;
And a list display step of displaying a list of the contents of the search result data.
A variable setting step of setting a target variable,
Searching the control program for the operation command which is likely to change the value of the target variable, verifying the retrieved operation command with the command specification data, and comparing the target variable name and the command name of the retrieved operation command, Type and processing contents into the search result data;
Searching the control program for a condition instruction for determining a condition for executing the operation command retrieved in the operation retrieving step, collating the retrieved condition command with the command specification data, A condition search step of writing the command name, the type of command and the contents of the search of the retrieved conditional command into the retrieval result data, and setting an argument of the retrieved conditional command as a new target variable;
A search determining step of performing the search again in the operation searching step and the condition searching step;
And a list display step of displaying contents of the search result data in a list.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2015/061757 WO2016166876A1 (en) | 2015-04-16 | 2015-04-16 | Program diagnosis device, program diagnosis method and program diagnosis program |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20170127569A true KR20170127569A (en) | 2017-11-21 |
KR101846140B1 KR101846140B1 (en) | 2018-04-05 |
Family
ID=57126471
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020177031427A KR101846140B1 (en) | 2015-04-16 | 2015-04-16 | Program diagnostic device, program diagnostic method, and program diagnostic program |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP6076565B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101846140B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN107533322B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016166876A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019003313A1 (en) * | 2017-06-27 | 2019-01-03 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Debugging device |
CN113424115B (en) * | 2019-02-14 | 2024-06-18 | 三菱电机株式会社 | Control system, programmable logic controller, method and recording medium |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2923997B2 (en) * | 1989-09-21 | 1999-07-26 | ソニー株式会社 | Finding the cause of an error in a ladder sequence program |
JP4242361B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2009-03-25 | オムロン株式会社 | Development support equipment |
DE602005015052D1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2009-08-06 | Omron Tateisi Electronics Co | Device for development support |
JP5500896B2 (en) * | 2009-07-27 | 2014-05-21 | 株式会社キーエンス | Program creation support apparatus, program creation support method, and computer program |
JP5506822B2 (en) * | 2009-12-28 | 2014-05-28 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Program creation support device |
DE112012006107B4 (en) * | 2012-03-26 | 2015-12-03 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp. | The sequence program debugging supporting device |
-
2015
- 2015-04-16 KR KR1020177031427A patent/KR101846140B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2015-04-16 CN CN201580078870.3A patent/CN107533322B/en active Active
- 2015-04-16 WO PCT/JP2015/061757 patent/WO2016166876A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-04-16 JP JP2016555855A patent/JP6076565B1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2016166876A1 (en) | 2016-10-20 |
CN107533322B (en) | 2019-04-19 |
JPWO2016166876A1 (en) | 2017-04-27 |
CN107533322A (en) | 2018-01-02 |
JP6076565B1 (en) | 2017-02-08 |
KR101846140B1 (en) | 2018-04-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3502814B1 (en) | Processing loads balancing of control and monitoring functions | |
US20060282189A1 (en) | Manufacturing control apparatus, manufacturing control method, and computer product | |
WO2018073868A1 (en) | Debugging assistance device and debugging assistance method | |
US8074182B2 (en) | Work procedure display method and system, production process management method and system, and computer program of the same | |
JP6433468B2 (en) | Program creation support method | |
KR101846140B1 (en) | Program diagnostic device, program diagnostic method, and program diagnostic program | |
JP6150953B2 (en) | Debugging device, debugging method, and debugging program | |
JP2009122936A (en) | Sequence program monitor device equipped with display function for abnormality research and programmable controller | |
JP4379687B2 (en) | Simulation support tool and ladder program verification system and program product | |
KR101456812B1 (en) | System design device | |
JP2008305019A (en) | Simulation device, simulation method and program | |
US9122772B2 (en) | Method for analyzing message archives and corresponding computer program | |
KR100650840B1 (en) | Testing device and programming tool | |
KR101303866B1 (en) | Method of monitoring substrate processing apparatus | |
JP6840294B1 (en) | Programmable display, control system and analysis method | |
WO2020189142A1 (en) | Control system, control method, and control program | |
JPH08179966A (en) | Program test device | |
JP7524784B2 (en) | Information processing device, control system, and report output method | |
JP2018109843A (en) | Comparison program, comparison method, information terminal device, and setting information comparison system | |
CN111158301B (en) | Tracking device and programmable controller | |
JP6003281B2 (en) | Quality evaluation system and quality evaluation method for products | |
JP2023107534A (en) | Support system, support method and program | |
JP6553461B2 (en) | Existing system processing specification extraction device | |
AU2011202744B2 (en) | Plant control system and method of specifying primary-factor for interlock | |
JPH11296358A (en) | Signal analysis support device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
A302 | Request for accelerated examination | ||
E701 | Decision to grant or registration of patent right |