KR20160121042A - System for submitting and evaluating a proposal - Google Patents
System for submitting and evaluating a proposal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20160121042A KR20160121042A KR1020150050437A KR20150050437A KR20160121042A KR 20160121042 A KR20160121042 A KR 20160121042A KR 1020150050437 A KR1020150050437 A KR 1020150050437A KR 20150050437 A KR20150050437 A KR 20150050437A KR 20160121042 A KR20160121042 A KR 20160121042A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- proposal
- evaluation
- evaluator
- terminal
- submission
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
The present invention relates to a proposal submission and evaluation system. More specifically, when an individual or a corporation submits a proposal to a public topic, the evaluator evaluates and approves the proposal, and an expert such as an investor judges the investment value, After the judgment, it provides the overall procedure that can be done up to the actual investment. In each procedure, the parties approve the system by giving a predetermined notice or by using various network communication networks, or storing and transmitting related documents in the system And to provide a criterion for judging whether or not an investment can be determined by evaluating a submitted proposal.
Today, in the era of intense technological competition between countries and companies, securing of technological competitiveness has become one of the important factors for national economy or enterprise development.
In order to secure technological competitiveness, it is necessary to develop a lot of excellent new technologies. Today, most of the new technologies are carried out by individuals, companies and nations, not by individuals or corporations alone. This is due to the fact that the supporting technology and the technological aspects of the industry are becoming more sophisticated and more complex and diverse, and that even if new technologies beyond the prior art are proposed by individuals, they are supported by large-scale research facilities, And support and protection is increasing at the national level. Therefore, the need for systematic and reliable management of a series of processes from the proposal stage to R & D and investment for most of today's technologies is increasing.
In order to achieve this, a business or a country receives a proposal from an individual or a corporation and selects and supports a business to perform (a task). Here, a proposal is a project or a project Based on these proposals, a company or a national institution evaluates the know-how, execution capability, technical ability, and investment value of a contractor in order to consult the experience or technical characteristics of the contractor. It also connects with investors.
As a result, the need for a more systematic, professional and transparent process from the submission of proposals to the actual investment after the valuation of the investment has been increasing, but until now, the process from submission of proposals to evaluation and investment is merely dependent on manpower There was a problem.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a system and method for providing proposals, review and approval of proposals by experts, , It is possible to communicate with the proponents, experts and investors by making it possible to transmit the documents through the communication network and to store the documents in the system or perform the integrated processing such as document transmission. It provides a management system that can smoothly carry out a series of processes from proposal writing to investment value judgment by judging the business performance and the investment value based on the basis, thereby ultimately creating high quality technology development and investment inducement .
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a proposal submission and evaluation system to which a proposal terminal, an evaluator terminal, an investor terminal, and a proposal submission and evaluation server are connected by a network communication network according to the present invention, The submission and evaluation server is a proposal submission system in which the proposal terminal downloads and builds a specific proposal form from the proposal submission and evaluation server and then uploads the prepared proposal or simply uploads the prepared proposal to submit the proposal. Means for providing an evaluation opinion for making a review opinion on the contents described in the proposal, reference data attaching means for attaching reference data related to proof of the proposal content, and means for attaching additional evaluator designation information from the evaluator terminal, A proposal evaluation system having additional evaluator designation means for notifying the fact that the additional evaluator designation is made by the terminal or e-mail; An investment decision system for notifying the proposal terminal and the investor terminal of a review opinion on the proposal from the evaluator terminal and providing an opinion on the investment made by the investor terminal; And a control system for performing user authentication through an authentication process including a user confirmation, a user classification, a confirmation of an access right, and a confirmation of a form use right for user authentication based on the access right of the proposal submission and evaluation server do.
Here, the proposal submission system may provide specific data included in the proposal to the proposer terminal so that the proposal terminal can select the specific data step by step, and the proposal may be created and submitted step by step in the proposal terminal.
In addition, the proposal submission system may include a proposal bibliographic information configuration module including at least one module for describing outline information or personal information of the proposal, a module for attaching a contract document related to the proposal, and a module for specifying a proposal evaluator Proposal creating means having means; And a proposal library DB having database of each contents of the proposal with at least one of menu, proposal standard item, proposal table item and storyboard item for each step included in the proposal.
Also, the proposal submission system may include a module for modifying the proposal standard stored in the proposal library DB into a proposal standard selected by the proposer terminal, a module for deriving a proposal table as a table of contents of a proposal selected by the user among storyboards of the proposal library DB, A module for constructing the proposal using the storyboard selected by the proposer among the storyboards of the proposal library DB, and a module for generating the final proposal by merging the proposed proposal draft, the proposal table and the storyboard.
Further, the proposer bibliographic information creating means of the proposal creating means may include a button for creating a proposal declaration, a button for submitting the created bibliographic information, a button for requesting an evaluator's evaluation, a button for confirming whether the evaluator has been evaluated, And a button for browsing.
In addition, the proposal library DB can perform an update operation to generate, change, delete, or add pre-stored proposal-related data as the pattern of the existing proposal changes or as a new proposal form is added, have.
In addition, the evaluation feedback means of the proposal evaluation system includes a portion for creating an overall review opinion on the submitted proposal, a portion for selectively making a request for supplement of the certification document and additional data, . ≪ / RTI >
In addition, the additional evaluator designation means of the proposal evaluation system may designate or additionally designate an expert having more technical knowledge about the proposal content at the designated evaluator terminal, reflect the replaced evaluator's opinion as an evaluation opinion, Evaluators can be assigned to reflect the opinions of all additional evaluators and reflect them in the evaluation opinion.
In addition, the proposal evaluation system includes a module for describing evaluation contents of the proposed proposal contents, a module for creating and attaching a drawing or a graph based on data related to the contents of the proposal, and market information related to the feasibility of commercialization of the contents of the proposal Or modules for attaching related data.
In addition, the proposal evaluation system may further include an evaluator selection module having a button for submitting the prepared evaluation sheet and a button for providing the approval or approval comment of the proposal.
In addition, the system for determining whether or not the investment is made may include an investment recommendation means for making an opinion on whether or not to invest in an evaluation opinion based on the contents described in the proposal, a criterion related to the determination of whether or not to invest, And additional investor designation means for notifying the additional investor of the additional investor designation fact information by using the investor terminal or e-mail when the additional investor designation information is received from the investor terminal.
In addition, the above-mentioned investment recommendation means is based on the overall review opinion on the proposed proposal, and it is determined whether it is necessary to supplement the investor opinion part and the proof sheet and the supplementary data, And may optionally include comments on whether or not the project is feasible.
In addition, as a result of the above determination, the data attaching means includes investment such as a price earning ratio (PER), an enterprice value (EV), an economic value added (EVA), and a market value added And provide the indicator data for review to the proposal submission and evaluation server.
In addition, the additional investor designating means may designate an alternative investor in the case where there is an investor who is more likely to invest substantially by having the technical knowledge of the proposed proposal content or engaged in a related field enterprise at the designated investor terminal , The opinions of the investors who have been replaced or the investors who have been added thereto may be collected and reflected in the opinion of the investors and the investment may be induced.
In addition, the investment decision system may further include an investment feasibility opinion indicating means for describing whether the investment value is based on a commercial feasibility opinion at the investor terminal.
In addition, the proposal submission and evaluation server may include a proposal management means for providing an alarm function related to progress management on the completion of submission of the proposal through reporting, reviewing and deliberation of the proposal content; A proposal contribution calculating means for calculating a proposal contribution imparted to the proposer in the same or different manner in accordance with the main proposer and the co-proposer, when the individual submits a proposal separately in the enterprise and proposes jointly; And extracting a lower keyword corresponding to the upper keyword and the lower description content from the description content described in the proposal, calculating a proposal submission ratio associated with each of the keywords, or comparing the ratio with the keywords of the preceding proposal, Keyword-based proposal support calculation means for statistically calculating the keyword-based proposal support.
In addition, the proposal submission and evaluation server may include an expert evaluation means for providing an evaluation opinion on the technical ability or the marketability based on the proposal contents described in the proposal, by the evaluator terminal or the investor terminal; And a proposal adoption possibility examining means for providing the evaluator terminal or the investor terminal with a review opinion on the possibility of adopting the proposal based on the created evaluation comment.
According to the present invention, by thoroughly processing the overall procedures for preparing, submitting and evaluating proposals, intensive internal / external review process is carried out through close interaction between the proposer, the evaluator and the investor, It has the effect of inducing.
In addition, in the case of the present invention, the evaluator or the investor's feedback is fed back to the proponent, so that the proponent can utilize the comment as a reference for the business progress by referring to comments on business feasibility and investment value, It has the effect of making it possible to prepare a business that can.
1 is a configuration diagram of a proposal submission and evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a proposal submission and evaluation server among the proposal submission and evaluation system according to FIG.
3 is a block diagram illustrating a detailed configuration of a proposal submission system among the proposal submission and evaluation servers according to FIG.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of a proposal creating unit of the proposal submission system according to FIG. 3. FIG.
5 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of a proposal evaluation system among proposal submission and evaluation servers according to FIG.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of the investment decision system of the proposal submission and evaluation server according to FIG. 2;
7 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a control system among proposal submission and evaluation servers according to FIG.
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of preparing and submitting a proposal in a proposal submission and evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and evaluating the proposal to determine whether or not to invest.
9 is a configuration diagram of a proposal submission and evaluation system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
10 is a flowchart showing a proposal review report generation process of the proposal submission and evaluation system according to FIG.
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
1 is a configuration diagram of a proposal submission and evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in FIG. 1, the proposal submission and evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a proposal submission and evaluation system, such as an intranet, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network (WAN) And can be connected to the
A proposal terminal (1) is a terminal used by a researcher, a businessman, or the like who answers a bidding announcement of a company or a government with respect to a publicized technical problem, and a proponent who wants to support the project. Here, the
The
Similar to the
Based on the proposal submitted by the proponent, the investor terminal (3), based on various evaluation items such as business performance ability, difference from conventional business, marketability, business feasibility, validity of business model, The
Here, the second evaluator and the investor can be selected from the same or the same group, for example, a bank, a credit rating company, an accounting firm, a domestic and overseas consulting company, a Korean appraisal company, (Value Added Ratio), EV (Enterprice Value), EVA (Economic Value Added), MVA (Market Value Added), and Market Value Added The investors selected from various individuals or group meetings regardless of their names, such as angel investors, angel clubs, various investment associations, start-up investment companies, asset management companies, It is possible to judge whether or not to invest.
2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a proposal submission and evaluation server among the proposal submission and evaluation system according to FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a detailed configuration of a proposal submission system among the proposal submission and evaluation servers according to FIG. FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of a proposal creating unit of the proposal submission system according to FIG. 3. FIG.
2 to 4, the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 according to the present invention includes a
The
Here, the proposal creation means 11 may include a proposer bibliographic information creation means 111. [
The proposer bibliographic information creation means 111 is means for generating bibliographic information of the proposal when bibliographical items related to the proposer are received from the
Although not shown in the drawing, a user interface screen including each module for the proposer to create the proposal bibliographic information using the
At this time, the proposal
The proposer bibliographic information creation means 111 may further include a
The proposal creation means 11 also creates a proposal when it receives a bid content via the network communication network 5 via the Internet or the like and related to an object to be bidded from the
The
In addition, the
The proposal standard item included in the proposal
5 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of a proposal evaluation system among proposal submission and evaluation servers according to FIG.
5, the
Although not shown in the drawing, a user interface screen for the proposal evaluator to create proposal evaluation content using his / her
The evaluation feedback means 21 includes an optional comment field for selectively making a request for supplementation of the proofreading commentary, additional documents and the like, and whether the overseas business can be progressed, in order to make an overall review opinion on the submitted proposal can do.
The reference
The additional evaluator designation means 23 designates a substitute designator of the proposer if the designated proposer evaluator judges that there is an expert capable of performing a more objective evaluation or a more technical knowledge of the proposal content than that of the proposer This is to designate an additional evaluator so that opinions can be reflected in the evaluation opinion or to reflect the opinions of the existing evaluator and the additional evaluator in the evaluation opinion.
The
In addition, the
The evaluation content creation module (2111) is a part for describing evaluation contents such as marketability, business capability, feasibility of business model, representative capability, possibility of overseas advancement of each related technology by evaluation item and detailing it. In this case, the evaluation items can be added in the form of a score divided into stages, and it is possible to automatically determine the ranking of the proposers by adding the added scores and adding the points according to the items and automatically displaying the statistical values .
The
The
At this time, the
Although not shown on the screen in this regard, a user interface screen may be provided for the evaluator to use the
FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of the investment decision system of the proposal submission and evaluation server according to FIG. 2;
Referring to FIG. 6, when the review opinion on the proposal is received from the second evaluator terminal 2 ', the
Although not shown in the drawing, a user interface screen may be provided for the investor to use his / her
Based on the overall review of the proposed proposal, the investment recommendation means (31) determines whether it is necessary to supplement the investor opinion column and the supporting documents and additional materials, And an investor request column that selectively generates opinions on whether overseas business can be proceeded.
As a result of the judgment, the
The additional investor designation means (33) may be used to designate a substitute investor if there is an investor who is more likely to invest substantially, such as having more technical knowledge of the proposed technology field than the designated investor himself, By further designation, the opinion of the additional investors is accepted and the opinions of the selected investors and the additional investors are collected, reflected in the opinions of the investors, and the investors are encouraged to invest.
At this time, in the
7 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a control system among proposal submission and evaluation servers according to FIG.
7, the
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of preparing and submitting a proposal in a proposal submission and evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and evaluating the proposal to determine whether or not to invest.
Referring to FIG. 8, the proposer accesses the proposal submission and
Here, the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 creates a proposal by merging the proposal bibliographic information and the proposal content information received from the proposer terminal 1 (S605), and transmits the created proposal to the
First, the
Thereafter, when data regarding the first or second approval of the proposal is received from the
Thereafter, the
When the process of notifying the second evaluator or the investor is completed, the second evaluator terminal 2 'or the
Subsequently, the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 creates and stores a proposal acceptance decision based on the proposal and the proposal review result (S675). The final proposal adoption decision may be written in the form provided by the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 at the second evaluator terminal 2 'or by selecting the corresponding item, or the proposal and the proposal review The document may be automatically created based on the result information.
At this time, although not shown in the drawing, a decision on whether or not to adopt a proposal may be provided, which is made by the "Proposal Acceptance Decision Making Department", and the decision on whether or not to adopt the proposal may include bibliographic information such as the history of the proposer, Information on the technology field, progress of the overseas business, information on the projected project date, and the like.
9 is a configuration diagram of a proposal submission and evaluation system according to another embodiment of the present invention. 10 is a flowchart showing a proposal review report generation process of the proposal submission and evaluation system according to FIG.
9 and 10, the proposal submission and evaluation server 4, as described above with reference to FIGS. 1 to 8, includes the proposal management means 14, the proposal contribution calculation means 15, a keyword-specific proposal support calculation means 16, a search means 17, a professional evaluation means 211, and a proposal adoption possibility review means 212.
The proposal management means 14 is a means for providing an alarm function related to progress management and the like for the completion of submission of the proposal through reporting, reviewing and deliberation of the proposal content. That is, it includes a role of determining whether the proposal is delivered to the first evaluator, the stage delivered to the second evaluator, the state delivered to the investor, etc., and individually notifying or displaying the proposal in a list.
The proposal contribution calculation means 15 calculates the contribution contribution to be given to the proposer in the same or different way according to the main proponent and the co-proponent in the case of the joint proponent, It is means. The proposal can be divided into a stand-alone proposal and a joint proposal. In the case of a joint proposal, the researchers are divided into two groups, one is a researcher who has high participation or contribution and the other is an assistant. (For example, once per quarter, once every six months, once a year, etc.) at a certain period after giving a certain additional point when the proposal is adopted It is possible to calculate the contribution rate, and to give extra compensation to the researchers who have high contribution, or to give a bonus point to the personnel affairs department. The technology contribution calculating means 15 can provide the researchers with the ability to check the contribution score of themselves or other researchers in real time to induce good competition among the researchers and provide the contribution information in the form of reports in the form of reports Or output it.
Referring to FIG. 10, when the
The evaluator who is requested to review the preliminary proposal prepares a preliminary proposal review report by using his / her evaluator terminal 2 '(S1020), and transmits the prepared preliminary proposal review report to the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 (S1025 ). The preliminary proposal review report includes the opinion of the evaluating experts about the possibility of adopting the proposal in the proposal or the recognition of the possibility of investing in technology. The selected evaluation expert is a senior researcher, officer, It may be an asset manager or an investor that the company is trading.
After receiving the proposal review report from the evaluator terminal 2 (S1030), the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 notifies the
The keyword-based proposal support calculation unit 16 extracts the lower keywords corresponding to the detailed description contents of the upper keyword and the upper keyword from the description contents described in the proposal, and then calculates the proposal support (submission) ratio associated with each of the lower keywords This is a structure for statistically calculating the ratio of proposals for each keyword through comparison with the keywords of the proposal.
Here, the high-level keyword may be a technology field currently being studied by a company, and in the case where a company develops technologies in various fields, the high-level keyword may be plural. For example, the robot recognition technique for human interaction may be biological signal recognition, environmental recognition, object recognition, emotion recognition, face recognition, and the like. The sub keywords of the biometric recognition technology include detailed descriptions of electroencephalogram, pulse waves, electrocardiogram .
First, the proposal support calculation unit 16 for each sub-keyword calculates a top keyword from the proposal declaration, determines a large category of the invention, calculates a sub-keyword as a detailed technical field in the category, It is possible to calculate the passing ratio. That is, by calculating the approval ratio of the proposal compared to the proposal submission for each of the upper keywords and the sub keywords thereof, and providing the proposal approval ratio to the proposer, it is possible for the proponents to know which keywords are likely to attract investment for R & Here, a method of calculating an upper keyword and a lower keyword is both a method of describing a related keyword on a proposal and a method of calculating a program using a text mining technique.
The keyword-based proposal support calculation unit 16 calculates the proposal supportability index of the lower keywords belonging to each higher keyword based on the keyword matching rate. For example, if the percentage of the sub-keywords extracted from the approved proposal is lower than that of the submitted sub-keywords, the related keywords are more likely to pass the proposal, In terms of the technology tree relationship between keywords and sub-keywords, it is probable that the probability of approving proposals of the sub-keywords corresponding to the main keywords of the main theme under study by the company is probabilistically calculated, It is possible to have the submission of the proposal for the user to be induced.
The search means 17 may provide a function to search by using one of the technical content, the proposer, the evaluator or the investor described in the proposal as a keyword.
The expert evaluation means 211 is a means for preparing a technical opinion on the technical content or marketability of the content of the proposal described in the proposal by the technical expert or the market expert etc. The prepared evaluation comment is stored in the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 , And then notifies the
The proposal adoption possibility review means 212 is a means for creating a review opinion on the possibility of adopting the proposal contents described in the proposal by a technical expert or a market expert etc. The prepared review opinion is stored in the proposal submission and evaluation server 4 And notifies the
The preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Therefore, the disclosed embodiments should be considered in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all differences within the scope of equivalents thereof should be construed as being included in the present invention.
1: proposer terminal 2: first evaluator terminal
2 ': second evaluator terminal 3: investor terminal
4: proposal submission and evaluation system 5: network communication network
10: Proposal submission system 20: Proposal evaluation system
30: Investment decision system
Claims (17)
The proposal submission and evaluation server,
A proposal submission system in which the proposal terminal downloads and builds a specific proposal form from the proposal submission and evaluation server and uploads the prepared proposal or simply uploads the prepared proposal to submit a proposal;
Means for providing an evaluation opinion for making a review opinion on the contents described in the proposal, reference data attaching means for attaching reference data related to proof of the proposal content, and means for attaching additional evaluator designation information from the evaluator terminal, A proposal evaluation system having additional evaluator designation means for notifying the fact that the additional evaluator designation is made by the terminal or e-mail;
An investment decision system for notifying the proposal terminal and the investor terminal of a review opinion on the proposal from the evaluator terminal and providing an opinion on the investment made by the investor terminal; And
And a control system for performing user authentication through an authentication process including a user authentication, a user classifying, an access right confirmation and a form use right confirmation process for user authentication based on the access right of the proposal submission and evaluation server The proposal submission and evaluation system.
The proposal submission system includes:
Wherein the proposal is provided to the proposer terminal so that the specific data included in the proposal can be selected step by step, and the proposal is created and submitted step by step in the proposal terminal.
The proposal submission system includes:
A proposal bibliographic information creation means including proposal bibliographic information creation means including at least one module among a module for listing outline information or personal information of the proposal, a module for attaching a contract document related to the proposal, and a module for designating a proposal evaluator ; And
And a proposal library DB having database of each contents of the proposal with at least one of menu, proposal standard item, proposal table item, and story board item for each step included in the proposal, Proposal Submission and Evaluation System.
The proposal submission system includes:
A module for modifying the proposal standard stored in the proposal library DB into a proposal standard selected by the proposer terminal, a module for deriving a proposal table as a table of contents of a proposal selected by the user among story boards of the proposal library DB, Further comprising a module for constructing a proposal using the storyboard selected by the proposer, and a module for generating a final proposal by merging the proposed proposal draft, the proposal table and the storyboard selected in the above.
The proposer bibliographic information creation means of the proposal creation means,
A button for creating a proposal declaration, a button for submitting the bibliographic information, a button for requesting an evaluator's evaluation, a button for confirming whether the evaluator has been evaluated, and a button for viewing the result of the proposal review Proposal submission and evaluation system.
In the proposal library DB,
A proposal submission and evaluation process is performed in which a proposal-related data is generated, changed, deleted or added as the pattern of the existing proposal is changed or a new proposal form is added, system.
The evaluation feedback means of the proposal evaluation system,
A proposal submitting and evaluation system which includes a part for making an overall review opinion on the submitted proposal and a part for selectively writing whether the supplementary document and additional data are necessary to be supplemented, .
The additional evaluator designation means of the proposal evaluation system,
The designated evaluator terminal may alternatively designate or designate an expert having more technical knowledge of the proposal content to reflect the opinion of the replaced evaluator as the evaluation opinion or collect the opinions of the existing evaluator and the additional evaluator to reflect the evaluation opinion Wherein the evaluator specifies the evaluator to perform the proposal.
The proposal evaluation system comprises:
A module for describing evaluation contents of the proposed proposal content, a module for creating and attaching a drawing or a graph based on data related to the contents of the proposal, a module for describing market information related to the commercialization of the content of the proposal, The proposal submission and evaluation system further comprising:
The proposal evaluation system comprises:
Further comprising: an evaluator selection module having a button for submitting the prepared evaluation sheet and a button for providing a rejection or approval comment of the proposal.
The system of claim 1,
In addition, it is necessary to provide additional information on investors to be provided from the investor terminal to the investor. The investor shall make a decision on whether or not to invest in the opinion based on the contents described in the above proposal. And additional investor designating means for informing the additional investor of the additional investor designation fact information by using the investor terminal or e-mail if the additional investor designation information is received.
The investment recommendation means may include:
Based on the overall review opinion on the proposed proposal, the section of the investor opinion, which is prepared to provide a criterion for judging whether or not the investment has actually been made, whether the supplementary documents and additional materials are necessary, And a part for selectively creating the proposal.
As a result of the determination,
Indicator data for reviewing investment such as PER (Price Earning Ratio), EV (Enterprice Value), EVA (Economic Value Added), MVA (Market Value Added) And provides the information to the submission and evaluation server.
Wherein said additional investor designation means comprises:
If there is an investor who has more technical knowledge of the proposed proposal or who is likely to invest substantially by engaging in an affiliated company, the designated investor may substitute or designate the investor so that the investor A proposal submission and evaluation system characterized by collecting opinions of investors who have been added, reflecting them in investor opinion and inducing investment.
The system of claim 1,
Further comprising an investment feasibility opinion describing means for indicating whether the investment value is based on business feasibility opinions from the investor terminal.
The proposal submission and evaluation server,
A proposal management means for providing an alarm function related to progress management on a proposal submission after the proposal content is reported, reviewed and deliberated;
A proposal contribution calculating means for calculating a proposal contribution imparted to the proposer in the same or different manner in accordance with the main proposer and the co-proposer, when the individual submits a proposal separately in the enterprise and proposes jointly; And
After extracting the upper keyword and the lower keyword corresponding to the detailed description from the description contents described in the proposal, the ratio of proposals related to the respective keywords is calculated, or the ratio of proposals is calculated for each keyword by comparing with the keywords of the preceding proposal Further comprising: a keyword-based proposal support calculation unit for statistically calculating the proposal submission and evaluation system.
The proposal submission and evaluation server,
The evaluator terminal or the investor terminal providing the evaluation opinion on the technicality or the marketability based on the proposal contents described in the proposal; And
And a proposal adoption possibility evaluating means for providing an evaluator terminal or an investor terminal with a review opinion on the possibility of adopting the proposal based on the created evaluation opinion.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020150050437A KR20160121042A (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2015-04-09 | System for submitting and evaluating a proposal |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020150050437A KR20160121042A (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2015-04-09 | System for submitting and evaluating a proposal |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR20160121042A true KR20160121042A (en) | 2016-10-19 |
Family
ID=57250811
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020150050437A KR20160121042A (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2015-04-09 | System for submitting and evaluating a proposal |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR20160121042A (en) |
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR102162696B1 (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2020-10-07 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | System and method for predicting the outcome of proposal evaluation based on big data using debriefing system |
| KR102159336B1 (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2020-10-14 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for searching text/image on document |
| KR20200121517A (en) * | 2019-04-16 | 2020-10-26 | 윤성민 | Decision support system and method thereof |
| KR102151408B1 (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2020-10-26 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for searching request for proposal text/image based on determination of matching rate |
| KR20210014935A (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2021-02-10 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for selecting proposal data and making proposal based on debriefing system |
| KR20210017115A (en) | 2019-08-07 | 2021-02-17 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | System and method of providing proposal data for order bidding |
| KR20210017443A (en) | 2019-08-08 | 2021-02-17 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Device of constructing and automatic processing big data-based proposal data for order bidding and method thereof |
| KR20210026697A (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2021-03-10 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Ocr-based quantitative data validation system and method for generating order bid proposals |
| KR20210026695A (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2021-03-10 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Ocr-based quantitative data processing system and method for generating order bid proposals |
| KR102316188B1 (en) | 2020-05-12 | 2021-10-22 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | System and method of verifying project resource for on-site due diligence of order project |
| KR20210129431A (en) | 2020-04-20 | 2021-10-28 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Automatic data mapping apparatus and method based on big data |
| KR20220074022A (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2022-06-03 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Required technology identification and analysis system |
| CN114677112A (en) * | 2022-03-25 | 2022-06-28 | 国网江西省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Power distribution network project large-scale evaluation method and system based on big data |
| KR20240003117A (en) * | 2022-06-30 | 2024-01-08 | 주식회사 리걸케어 | Document management server and method thereof |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20000017438A (en) | 1998-08-21 | 2000-03-25 | 리더 존 피. | Solar control coated glass |
| KR101176718B1 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2012-08-28 | 유용진 | The public contest or mediation system and methods for resources, knowledge information and creative ideas on the network based |
-
2015
- 2015-04-09 KR KR1020150050437A patent/KR20160121042A/en unknown
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20000017438A (en) | 1998-08-21 | 2000-03-25 | 리더 존 피. | Solar control coated glass |
| KR101176718B1 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2012-08-28 | 유용진 | The public contest or mediation system and methods for resources, knowledge information and creative ideas on the network based |
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20200121517A (en) * | 2019-04-16 | 2020-10-26 | 윤성민 | Decision support system and method thereof |
| KR102162696B1 (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2020-10-07 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | System and method for predicting the outcome of proposal evaluation based on big data using debriefing system |
| KR20210014935A (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2021-02-10 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for selecting proposal data and making proposal based on debriefing system |
| KR20210017115A (en) | 2019-08-07 | 2021-02-17 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | System and method of providing proposal data for order bidding |
| KR20210017443A (en) | 2019-08-08 | 2021-02-17 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Device of constructing and automatic processing big data-based proposal data for order bidding and method thereof |
| KR102151408B1 (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2020-10-26 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for searching request for proposal text/image based on determination of matching rate |
| KR102159336B1 (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2020-10-14 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for searching text/image on document |
| KR20210026697A (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2021-03-10 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Ocr-based quantitative data validation system and method for generating order bid proposals |
| KR20210026695A (en) | 2019-08-31 | 2021-03-10 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Ocr-based quantitative data processing system and method for generating order bid proposals |
| KR20210129431A (en) | 2020-04-20 | 2021-10-28 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Automatic data mapping apparatus and method based on big data |
| KR102316188B1 (en) | 2020-05-12 | 2021-10-22 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | System and method of verifying project resource for on-site due diligence of order project |
| KR20220074022A (en) * | 2020-11-27 | 2022-06-03 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Required technology identification and analysis system |
| CN114677112A (en) * | 2022-03-25 | 2022-06-28 | 国网江西省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Power distribution network project large-scale evaluation method and system based on big data |
| KR20240003117A (en) * | 2022-06-30 | 2024-01-08 | 주식회사 리걸케어 | Document management server and method thereof |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR20160121042A (en) | System for submitting and evaluating a proposal | |
| US10395187B2 (en) | Multilevel assignment of jobs and tasks in online work management system | |
| KR101844751B1 (en) | A System Providing Matching Flatform Service Based On Enterprise Analysis | |
| US7212985B2 (en) | Automated system and method for managing a process for the shopping and selection of human entities | |
| Jafari | A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method | |
| CN109074389A (en) | The crowdsourcing of confidence level target | |
| CN111178705A (en) | Item evaluation method, item evaluation device, item evaluation apparatus, and storage medium | |
| US20030187706A1 (en) | Innovation engine portal method and system | |
| US20020016727A1 (en) | Systems and methods for interactive innovation marketplace | |
| US20070198319A1 (en) | Automated system and method for managing a process for the shopping and selection of human entities | |
| US8204790B1 (en) | System and method for matching buyers and sellers | |
| KR101517966B1 (en) | Method for providing analysis-service of bid joining | |
| JP6865195B2 (en) | Technical information provision system | |
| US20060173699A1 (en) | Virtual technology transfer network | |
| US20060085480A1 (en) | Human resource sourcing exchange | |
| US20210089980A1 (en) | Systems and Methods for Automating Operational Due Diligence Analysis to Objectively Quantify Risk Factors | |
| US20130018812A1 (en) | System for Regulation of Continuing Education Requirements | |
| McKenzie | Micro-assets and portfolio management in the new platform economy | |
| KR20100104831A (en) | Method for providing job-offering and job-seeking service using job-offering and job-seeking site capable of supporting career management | |
| US20070219886A1 (en) | System and method for managing data relating to non-traditional investments | |
| KR20200113699A (en) | Intelligent bid analyzing system using UI development tool and method thereof | |
| US20230316197A1 (en) | Collaborative, multi-user platform for data integration and digital content sharing | |
| KR20040107971A (en) | Method and system for technology assessment | |
| JP5135295B2 (en) | Project personnel selection support management system and program | |
| JP6952965B1 (en) | Scout system |