KR20150014335A - Method of examination site management and server performing the same - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a test site management method. In a test site management method which is performed in a test site management server for managing network-based test environment, the test site management method of the present invention includes the steps of: (a) determining a test site optimization schedule on the basis of test site environment information related with a test terminal and then informing an optimization inspector of the determined schedule; (b) generating network test result by performing a network test with the test terminal during the optimization schedule; (c) receiving optimization judgment information as to the test terminal generated through an optimization judgment agent managed by the optimization inspector within a specific period from the optimization schedule; and (d) determining whether to optimize the test site on the basis of the generated network test result and the received optimization judgment information and then informing a test site manager of the result for judging whether to optimize the test site. Therefore, the method can determine test conformity as to the test site under the network-based test environment.

Description

METHOD OF EXAMINATION SITE MANAGEMENT AND SERVER PERFORMING THE SAME [0002]

The present invention relates to a test site management technique, and more particularly, to a test site management method capable of determining test suitability for a test site in a network-based test environment and a test site management server for performing the test site management method.

IBT (Internet based test) is a network-based test method, which is an electronic test service that can provide a comfortable test environment through digitized test data and automated test procedures.

Korean Patent Laid-Open No. 10-2004-0021170 discloses an evaluation system and method using an online network that can perform various test evaluations using a network such as the Internet or an intranet. The evaluation system using the online network can perform the certification examination at any desired place and time, and the certification management can be easily handled because the question examination and the scoring process are performed collectively.

Korean Patent Laid-Open No. 10-2000-0037160 discloses a method for acquiring a cyber certification on the Internet and a system for providing the same, which can unify standards and names related to technical qualifications through the operation of cyber certification using the Internet. Such a cyber qualification acquisition method can improve the qualification and status of technical personnel and utilize the internet efficiently by establishing proper qualification system, meeting the needs of netizens, and streamlining management and operation.

Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2004-0021170 Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2000-0037160

The present invention provides a test site management method capable of determining test suitability for a test site in a network-based test environment.

The present invention intends to provide a test site management method capable of automatically determining whether a site optimization schedule is established and optimized.

Among the embodiments, a test site management method performed in a test site management server for managing a network-based test environment includes: (a) determining a test site optimization schedule based on test site environment information associated with the test terminal and notifying the optimization inspector; (b) generating a network test result by performing a network test with the test terminal during the optimization period; (c) performing a network test with the test terminal through the optimization determination agent managed by the optimization checker And (d) determining whether to optimize the test site based on the generated network test result and the received optimization determination information, and notifying the site manager of the optimization result.

In one embodiment, the step (a) includes the steps of: determining a site optimization schedule based on a test schedule stored in a database, a site completion time limit, a test site location information, and a test terminal placement information (quantity) Assigning the optimization inspectors as a basis, and notifying the optimization inspector of the allocated site site optimization schedule.

In one embodiment, the step (c) may further include receiving actual test site environment information and updating the test site environment information by determining whether the test site environment information matches the actual test environment information .

In one embodiment, the step (c) includes receiving a test result based on a headset installation result and a hardware profile of the test terminal, and determining whether the result of the headset installation or the test result satisfies a specific criterion Step < / RTI >

Here, the step of determining whether the headset installation result or the test result satisfies a specific criterion may include determining whether the headset installation result or the test result satisfies a specific criterion, Receiving the technical support information from the technical staff within a predetermined period of time and updating the optimization determination information based on the technical support information.

In one embodiment, the site management method may further comprise performing an optimization test on the optimization examiner prior to step (a) to authenticate the optimization examiner.

In one embodiment, the step (c) may further include decreasing the reliability of the optimizer when the test suitability determination information for the test terminal is received before or during the optimization period.

The step (c) may further include, if the reliability of the real estate manager is below a predetermined reference value, depriving the real estate manager of the real estate management qualification.

In one embodiment, determining whether to optimize the test site and notifying the site manager may include storing the test site optimization result to complete the site optimization and limiting the login to the test terminal, And may further include periodically confirming the login information.

Here, completing the site optimization may include generating a site optimization state based on site site optimization results; And a step of displaying the test site optimization status step by step upon receiving a query request for the test site optimization status.

In one embodiment, the test site management method may further include: (e) transmitting, to the test site management terminal, nonconformity evaluation information for the test terminal, when the test conformity to the test terminal is determined to be inadequate.

Here, the step (e) may include receiving a test suitability re-determination request from the test site management terminal for the test terminal; And a step of determining an actual schedule for the test suitability re-determination request and notifying the real manager of the test.

In addition, the step (e) may include: determining whether the non-conformity of the test terminal with the nonconformity evaluation information is solved; And authenticating the test site to the test site management terminal if the nonconformity to the test terminal is resolved.

Among the embodiments, the test site management server that manages the network-based test environment includes an optimization schedule establishing unit that determines a site optimization schedule based on the test site environment information associated with the test terminal and notifies the optimization inspector of the test site environment schedule, A network test unit for performing a network test with the optimization checker to generate a network test result, receiving optimization determination information for the test terminal generated through an optimization decision agent managed by the optimization checker within a specific period from the optimization schedule And a test suitability determining unit for determining whether to optimize the test site based on the generated network test result and the received optimization decision information, and notifying the site manager of the optimization.

In one embodiment, the test site management server may further include a test site environment information receiving unit for receiving test site environment information associated with the test terminal in the test site from the test site management terminal.

The test site management method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can determine test suitability for a test site in a network-based test environment based on optimization determination information.

The test site management method according to an embodiment of the present invention can establish a test site optimization schedule based on the test site environment information and automatically determine whether to optimize based on the optimization determination information.

1 is a view for explaining a test site management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a block diagram illustrating the test site management server in FIG.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a site optimization process performed in the site management server shown in FIG.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a test site optimization process according to an exemplary embodiment performed in the test site management server in FIG.

The description of the present invention is merely an example for structural or functional explanation, and the scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited by the embodiments described in the text. That is, the embodiments are to be construed as being variously embodied and having various forms, so that the scope of the present invention should be understood to include equivalents capable of realizing technical ideas. Also, the purpose or effect of the present invention should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, since it does not mean that a specific embodiment should include all or only such effect.

Meanwhile, the meaning of the terms described in the present application should be understood as follows.

The terms "first "," second ", and the like are intended to distinguish one element from another, and the scope of the right should not be limited by these terms. For example, the first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as a first component.

It should be understood that the term " and / or " includes all possible combinations from one or more related items. For example, the meaning of " first item, second item and / or third item " may be presented from two or more of the first, second or third items as well as the first, second or third item It means a combination of all the items that can be.

It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected to the other element, but there may be other elements in between. On the other hand, when an element is referred to as being "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that there are no other elements in between. On the other hand, other expressions that describe the relationship between components, such as "between" and "between" or "neighboring to" and "directly adjacent to" should be interpreted as well.

It is to be understood that the singular " include " or "have" are to be construed as including the stated feature, number, step, operation, It is to be understood that the combination is intended to specify that it does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, or combinations thereof.

In each step, the identification code (e.g., a, b, c, etc.) is used for convenience of explanation, the identification code does not describe the order of each step, Unless otherwise stated, it may occur differently from the stated order. That is, each step may occur in the same order as described, may be performed substantially concurrently, or may be performed in reverse order.

The present invention can be embodied as computer-readable code on a computer-readable recording medium, and the computer-readable recording medium includes all kinds of recording devices for storing data that can be read by a computer system . Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include a ROM, a RAM, a CD-ROM, a magnetic tape, a floppy disk, an optical data storage device, and the like, and also implemented in the form of a carrier wave (for example, transmission over the Internet) . In addition, the computer-readable recording medium may be distributed over network-connected computer systems so that computer readable codes can be stored and executed in a distributed manner.

All terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs, unless otherwise defined. Commonly used predefined terms should be interpreted to be consistent with the meanings in the context of the related art and can not be interpreted as having ideal or overly formal meaning unless explicitly defined in the present application.

1 is a view for explaining a test site management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, a test site management system 100 includes a test site management server 110, a test site management terminal 120, and a test terminal 130.

The test site management server 110 is connected to the test site management terminal 120 via the network and can receive test environment information associated with the test terminal 130 in the test site from the test site management terminal 120. Here, the test site management server 110 may store and manage the test environment information received from the plurality of test site management terminals 120 based on the network.

The test site management server 110 is connected to the test terminal 130 through the network and connects the test terminal 130 according to the test environment information (for example, IP address, SW state, and HW state) You can check. Here, the test site management server 110 may receive test environment information for a plurality of test terminals 130 through one test site management terminal 120 connected to the plurality of test terminals 130.

In one embodiment, the test site management server 110 may provide a management program implemented as a computer-readable recording medium. Here, the provision may include distribution of a computer program, and execution of a computer program in a network environment.

The test site management terminal 120 may be connected to the test site management server 110 via a network to transmit test environment information to the test terminal 130. Here, the test site management terminal 120 may monitor a plurality of test terminals 130 to control the test environment information for the plurality of test terminals 130.

In one embodiment, the test site management terminal 120 may receive a test suitability for the test site from the test site management server 110. For example, the test site management terminal 120 checks the test environment for each of the listening test, the reading test, the writing test, and the speaking test of the test terminal 130, and transmits the test environment to the test site management server 110, And the test conformance of each type of test.

The test terminal 130 is connected to the test site management server 110 through the network so that the test environment information can be checked. Here, the test terminal 130 may be monitored by the test site management terminal 120 to manage the test environment information, and the test environment information managed through the test site management terminal 120 may be stored in the test site management server 110 .

In one embodiment, the test terminal 130 may include at least one of a keyboard module, a mouse module, a sound output module, a sound input module, or a monitor module for a listening test, a reading test, a writing test, and a speaking test. Here, the test terminal 130 may correspond to a desktop, a laptop, a smart phone, and / or a tablet personal computer that can be operated in a network environment.

2 is a block diagram illustrating the test site management server in FIG.

2, the test site management server 110 includes a test site environment information receiving unit 210, an optimization schedule establishing unit 220, a network testing unit 230, an optimization determination information receiving unit 240, a test suitability determining unit 250 And a control unit 260. As shown in FIG.

The test site management server 110 can authenticate the test site manager through the login and confirm whether the test site management terminal 120 is within a specific range from the test site and grant registration authority for the test site environment information to the test site management terminal 120 .

In one embodiment, the test site management server 110 checks whether the test site management terminal 120 that the test site manager has logged into is within a specific range from the test site when the test site manager who has completed the real name authentication through the EPKI logs in, (WI-FI Protected Setup). Here, if the test site management terminal 120 is within a specific range from the test site, the test site management server 110 gives the test site management terminal 120 the right to register the site environment information so that the site manager can provide the site environment information for the site Can be input.

In another embodiment, when the test site manager logs in, the test site management server 110 checks whether the IP address of the test site management terminal 120 logged in by the test site manager is the test site database (here, the test site database is managed by the test site management server 110) It can be confirmed that the IP address is registered in advance. Here, if the IP address of the test site management terminal 120 to which the test site manager logs in is registered in the test site database, the test site management server 110 may grant the site site management terminal 120 the right to register the test site environment information .

The site management server 110 may perform an optimization test on the optimization tester to authenticate the optimization tester.

In one embodiment, the test site management server 110 can verify the completion of the optimization training by sending a video lecture about the site optimization to the optimization inspector and providing a problem to check whether the lecture is taken or not.

The test site environment information receiving unit 210 receives the test site environment information associated with the test terminal 130 in the test site from the test site management terminal 120.

In one embodiment, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 may input the test site environment information to the test site management terminal 120 when the test site manager logs in through the test site management terminal 120.

In another embodiment, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 may receive a real test for the test site. For example, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 can request the test site management terminal 120 to view the test site from various viewpoints.

In one embodiment, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 may receive information related to site site optimization schedule establishment from another server.

For example, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 may receive the test schedule, the time limit for completing the site optimization, the test site location information, and the test terminal placement information (including the number of test terminals) from the database server (not shown).

The optimization schedule establishing unit 220 determines the site optimization schedule based on the received test site environment information, and notifies the optimization checker.

In one embodiment, the optimization scheduling unit 220 may check the test site environment information for the test terminal 120 received from the test site management terminal 120 to determine an optimization schedule. For example, the optimization scheduling unit 220 may include an identification number of the test terminal 130 for the test terminal 120, a number of the test terminal 130 in the test site, an input / output device , The input / output device may include a speaker, a microphone, and a keyboard for a listening test, a writing test, a speaking test, and a reading test), a S / W status for the test terminal 130, / W status and a desired schedule of the actual test can be checked to determine the actual schedule according to the reliability between the test site environment information associated with the test terminal 130 and the reference test site environment information. Herein, if the reliability between the test site environment information and the reference test site environment information associated with the test terminal 130 is equal to or higher than a specific criterion, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can determine the optimization schedule and notify the optimization checker, If the reliability between the test site environment information and the reference test site environment information associated with the test site environment information is less than a specific criterion, the test site management terminal 120 can notify the test site of the rejection.

In one embodiment, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can determine the site optimization schedule based on the test schedule stored in the database server (not shown), the completion time of the site optimization, the site location information, and the test terminal placement information (quantity) .

For example, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 may determine the final schedule of the optimization on June 23, based on the test schedule information of June 30, and the completion period of the corresponding site optimization seven days before the test schedule. In connection with the test site location information and the test terminal placement information, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 sets 1000 sites in Seoul, 300 sites in Daejeon, 300 sites in Daegu, 300 sites in Daegu, 500 sites in Busan, and 300 sites in Gwangju Based on this, it is possible to plan the optimum number of people to be based on the inspection of 100 units per person per day, with 10 people in Seoul, 3 people in Daejeon, 3 people in Daegu, 5 people in Busan, and 3 people in Gwangju. In addition, when the initially assigned optimizing inspectors correspond to 6 persons, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can determine the optimization required period of 4 days on average based on the number of persons to be optimized. From 19th of May to 23rd of June, it is possible to establish an optimization schedule.

In one embodiment, the optimization scheduling section 220 can assign the optimization inspectors based on the determined site optimization schedule.

For example, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can set a four-day optimization schedule in consideration of the distance between the inspectors and the test site, when the address of each inspectors corresponds to two persons in Seoul, three persons in Daejeon and one in Busan.

division A (Seoul) B (Seoul) C (Seoul) D (Daejeon) E (Busan) F (Busan) 6.19 Seoul 1 Seoul 2 Seoul 3 Daejeon 1 Busan 1 Daegu 1 6.20 Seoul 4 Seoul 5 Seoul 6 Daejeon 2 Busan 2 Daegu 2 6.21 Seoul 7 Seoul 8 Guangzhou 1 Daejeon 3 Busan 3 Daegu 3 6.22 Seoul 9 Seoul 10 Guangzhou 2 Guangzhou 3 Busan 4 Busan 5 6.23
(Preliminary work) - - - - - -

Table 1 is a table showing one embodiment of the established optimization schedule. As shown in Table 1, the horizontal direction represents the optimization schedule, the vertical direction represents the optimization checker (address), and the middle region represents the test site for which the optimization tester should perform the field optimization according to the optimization schedule.

In one embodiment, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can notify the optimization examiner of the allocated site site optimization schedule.

For example, when the designated site optimization schedule is determined, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can notify the mobile communication terminal or the like of the optimization schedule based on the membership information of the optimization inspector.

The network testing unit 230 performs a network test with the test terminal during the optimization period to generate a network test result.

The network testing unit 230 generates a virtual machine (VM), allocates a virtual machine according to a virtual machine allocation request from the test terminal 130, and determines whether the network is created (Ping test), and the communication data error rate can be checked.

The network testing unit 230 generates a network test result for the test terminal 130 based on the check result. On the other hand, the generated network test result can be utilized when determining whether to optimize the test site.

The optimization decision information receiving unit 240 receives the optimization decision information for the test terminal 130 generated through the optimization decision agent managed by the optimization inspectors within a specific period from the actual scan schedule.

In one embodiment, the optimization decision information receiver 240 receives the optimization decision information for the test terminal 130 prior to the actual schedule, or if the optimization decision information for the test terminal 130 is received after a certain period of time, Can be reduced. Herein, the reliability is a capacity measure for the optimizing observer. The optimizing judgment information receiving unit 240 can allocate a lot of visits to the optimizing inspector as the reliability of the optimization inspecting person is higher. As the reliability of the optimization inspecting person is lower, You can assign less test site visits. For example, if the optimization schedule for the test site is 2013-06-01 and the specific time period is 10 days, the optimization decision information receiver 240 may be configured to optimize the test terminal 130 before 2013-06-01 When the judgment information is received, the reliability of the optimization checker can be reduced and a warning message can be sent to the optimization checker. For example, the optimizing decision information receiver 240 may determine whether the test schedule for the test site is 2013-06-01 and the specific duration is 10 days, When the optimization decision information is received, it is possible to reduce the reliability of the optimization checker and send a warning message to the optimization checker.

In another embodiment, the optimization decision information receiver 240 may deprive the optimization checker of the optimization checker if the reliability of the optimization checker is below a certain reference value. For example, the optimization determination information receiver 240 can check the reliability of the optimization checker to determine whether the optimization checker is eligible for the optimization check. Here, the optimization decision information receiving unit 240 may deprive the optimization inspectors of the actual inspection management qualification if the reliability for the optimization inspectors is 1 and the specific standard value is 2. [

The test suitability determining unit 250 determines whether or not the test site is optimized based on the received optimization determination information and notifies the site manager.

In one embodiment, the test suitability determining unit 250 may determine whether to optimize the test terminal 130 according to the match degree between the optimization criteria according to the test type and each of the plurality of optimization evaluation items. Here, the match degree can be calculated through the following equation (1).

Where f (E_sda, E_sds) may correspond to the exact match of the test conformance metrics and the test conformance criteria, and IA_plus1 may correspond to additional scores according to the test conformity metrics and the exact match of the test conformance metrics , And g (E_sda, E_sds) may correspond to the number of partial matches of the test conformance test item and the test conformance criterion, and IA_plus2 may correspond to the additional score according to the test conformance evaluation item and the partial conformance criterion of the test conformance criterion , E_sda may correspond to the number of test conformance evaluation items, and E_sds may correspond to the test conformance criteria number.

)에 해당하여 시험장에 대한 적합성이 적합으로 결정될 수 있다. 다른 예를 들어, 일치도는 시험 적합성 평가 항목과 시험 적합성 기준의 완전 일치 수가 2이고, 시험 적합성 평가 항목과 시험 적합성 기준의 완전 일치 수에 따른 추가 점수가 10이고, 시험 적합성 평가 항목과 시험 적합성 기준의 부분 일치 수가 5이고, 시험 적합성 평가 항목과 시험 적합성 기준의 부분 일치 수에 따른 추가 점수가 5이고, 시험 적합성 평가 항목 수가 15이며, 시험 적합성 기준 수가 30이면 1(

)에 해당하여 시험장에 대한 적합성이 부적합으로 결정될 수 있다.At this time, the test suitability determining unit 250 can authenticate the test conformance to the test terminal 130 if the match degree is 2 or more. For example, the degree of conformity may be determined by comparing the test conformance criterion with the test conformance criterion and the additional score according to the test conformity criterion and the test conformity criterion is 10, The number of partial matches is 8, the additional score is 5 according to the number of partial matches of the test conformance test items and the test conformance criteria, the number of test conformance items is 15,

), Conformity to the test site may be determined as appropriate. For another example, the degree of conformity may be determined by comparing the test conformance test item with the test conformance criterion 2, the additional score according to the test conformity test item and the test conformity criterion is 10, The number of partial matches is 5, the additional score is 5 according to the number of partial conformances of the test conformance test item and the test conformance standard, the test conformity evaluation item number is 15, and the test conformity criterion number is 30, 1

), The suitability for the test site may be determined to be unsuitable.

In another embodiment, the test suitability determining unit 250 may determine the test suitability for the test terminal 130 according to the score of the plurality of test suitability evaluation items according to the test type. For example, the test suitability determining unit 250 receives a plurality of test conformance items according to the speaking test, the listening test, the reading test, and the writing test, determines the score of each test conformity assessment item, A test suitability for the test terminal 130 may be determined by comparing the score to the reference score. Here, the score may correspond to one of the lowest 0 to the highest 5.

The test suitability determining unit 250 transmits the nonconformity evaluation information for the test terminal 130 to the test site management terminal 120 when it is determined that the test conformance to the test terminal 130 is inadequate.

In one embodiment, when the test suitability determining unit 250 receives a request for test suitability re-determination from the test site management terminal 120 to the test terminal 130, the test suitability determining unit 250 determines the schedule of the test suitability re- Can be notified. For example, when the disqualification information transmission unit 250 receives a request for the second test suitability determination from the test site management terminal 120 to the test terminal 130 in the test site, the first test conformance is tested for the corresponding test site The optimizer can be searched to notify the optimization optimizer of the due diligence schedule.

The test suitability determining unit 250 determines whether or not the nonconformity of the test terminal 130 is solved and if the nonconformity of the test terminal 130 is resolved, can do. Here, the test suitability determining unit 250 determines whether the nonconformity of the test terminal 130 is solved, and if the nonconformity of the test terminal 120 is not resolved, May send a rejection message for the test conformance.

The control unit 260 controls the overall operation of the test site management server 110 and includes a test site environment information receiving unit 210, an optimization schedule establishing unit 220, a network test unit 230, an optimization determination information receiving unit 240, It is possible to control the data flow between the conformance determining unit 250 and the conformance determining unit 250. [

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a site optimization process performed in the site management server shown in FIG.

Referring to FIG. 3, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 receives test site environment information associated with the test terminal 130 in the test site from the test site management terminal 120 (S310).

In one embodiment, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 may receive a test schedule, a test site optimization completion period, test site location information, and test terminal placement information (quantity) from a database server (not shown). In addition, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 may store the received information in a database (not shown).

The optimization schedule establishing unit 220 determines the site optimization schedule based on the site environment information associated with the test terminal and notifies the optimization inspector of the schedule optimization schedule (S320).

In one embodiment, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can determine the site optimization schedule based on the test schedule stored in the database, the completion time of the site optimization, the site location information, and the test terminal placement information (quantity).

In one embodiment, the optimization scheduling section 220 can assign the optimization inspectors based on the determined site optimization schedule.

In one embodiment, the optimization schedule establishing unit 220 can notify the optimization examiner of the allocated site site optimization schedule.

The test site environment information receiving unit 210 may provide the optimizing inspector with the test site registration information received in the test site authentication step performed before the test site optimization step during the optimization schedule.

(E.g., H / W, S / W) of the test terminal 130 placed in the corresponding test site, the test terminal 130, the test site environment information receiving unit 210, Network configuration information between the test site management server 110 and the test terminal 130, and location information (e.g., site map) of the test terminals 130, respectively. On the other hand, the Optimization Inspector can confirm the contents of the test site registration based on the provided test site registration information.

The test site environment information receiving unit 210 may receive the actual test site environment information through the optimization determination scenario during the optimization schedule (S330).

In one embodiment, the test site environment information receiving unit 210 provides the received test environment information to the test suitability determining unit 250, and the test suitability determining unit 250 determines the test environment information, Environment information, and may update the test site environment information (S340).

The network testing unit 230 performs a network test with the test terminal 130 during the optimization period to generate a network test result (S350).

The optimization decision information receiving unit 240 receives the optimization decision information for the test terminal generated through the optimization decision agent from the optimization schedule within a specific period (S360).

In one embodiment, the optimization decision information receiver 240 can receive optimization decision information including a plurality of test conformance evaluation items according to the speech test, the listen test, the read test, and the write test evaluated through the test suitability determination agent have. For example, the optimization decision information receiver 240 may determine each test conformance assessment item (e.g., microphone performance and / or performance) based on the speaking, listening, reading, and writing tests associated with the test terminal 130 in the test site. Noise state, speaker performance and noise state, keyboard or mouse press state).

The test suitability determining unit 250 determines whether the optimization criterion information satisfies a specific criterion, that is, whether the test terminal is abnormal or not (S370).

The test suitability determining unit 250 determines whether the test site is optimized based on the generated network test result and the received optimization decision information, and notifies the site manager (S390).

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a test site optimization process according to an exemplary embodiment performed in the test site management server in FIG.

Referring to FIG. 4, steps S405 to S454 for optimizing the schedule and determining whether to optimize are the same as steps S310 to S390 of FIG. 3, so that a description thereof will be omitted.

The test suitability determining unit 250 may generate and store a site optimization result based on site site judgment information.

The test suitability determining unit 250 may generate the site optimization status based on the site optimization result (S450).

In one embodiment, the test suitability determining unit 250 may display the test site optimization status step by step (S455) when the test site management server 110 receives the inquiry about the optimization status at each specific time.

For example, if the test site optimization schedule is designed for about 2,000 test terminals in 50 cities over 4 days, the test suitability determining unit 250 can generate the optimization status every hour according to the optimization schedule , And receives an inquiry about the optimization status at a specific time point, the optimization status at the time point can be displayed through the terminal of the requestor (administrator terminal). Further, the test suitability determining unit 250 can generate the test site optimization status of the nation-trial-school-test site sequence in the order of the test site optimization status, and display it in stages according to the request.

When the test optimization is completed, the test site management server 110 can register the test site optimization register. Here, the site optimization log corresponds to the optimization result including the criteria for determining whether the site is optimized, the optimization determination information, and the optimization time.

After site-space optimization, the site management server 110 limits the login to the test terminal and periodically verifies the login information for the test terminal.

For example, the test site management server 110 establishes an access restriction to the test terminal through the network, receives the login information for the test terminals 130 on a time basis, and confirms the connection to the specific terminal To maintain the site optimization.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims It can be understood that

100: Test Site Management System
110: test site management server 120: test site management terminal
130: Test terminal 210: Test site environment information receiving unit
220: Optimization schedule establishing unit 230: Network test unit
240: Optimization judgment information receiving unit 250: Test suitability determining unit
260:

Claims (15)

A test site management method performed on a test site management server for managing a network-based test environment,
(a) determining a site optimization schedule based on the site environment information associated with the test terminal and notifying the optimization inspector;
(b) performing a network test with the test terminal during the optimization period to generate a network test result;
(c) receiving optimization decision information for the test terminal generated through the optimization decision agent managed by the optimization inspectors from the optimization schedule within a specific period; And
(d) determining whether to optimize the test site based on the generated network test result and the received optimization decision information, and notifying the site manager of the optimization.
The method of claim 1, wherein step (a)
Determining a site optimization schedule based on the test schedule stored in the database, the completion time of the site optimization, the site location information, and the test terminal placement information (quantity);
Assigning the optimization inspectors based on the determined site site optimization schedule; And
And notifying the optimization inspector of the assigned site site optimization schedule.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c)
Receiving actual site environment information; And
Further comprising the step of determining whether the test site environment information matches the actual test site environment information and updating the test site environment information.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c)
Receiving a test result based on a headset installation result and a hardware profile of the test terminal; And
Further comprising the step of determining whether the result of installing the headset or the test result satisfies a specific criterion.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of determining whether the headset installation result or the test result satisfies a specific criterion
Receiving technical support information from a technical client within a specific time from a reception result of the headset and a time of receiving the test result when the determination result does not satisfy a specific criterion; And
Further comprising the step of updating the optimization determination information based on the technical support information.
The method according to claim 1,
Further comprising the step of performing an optimization test on the optimization examiner before the step (a) to authenticate the optimization examiner.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c)
Further comprising decreasing the reliability of the optimization examiner when test suitability determination information for the test terminal is received before the optimization schedule or during the specific period.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein step (c)
And if the reliability of the real estate manager is below a predetermined standard value, depriving the real estate manager of the real estate management qualification.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d)
Storing the site optimization result to complete the site optimization; And
Further comprising the step of: limiting login to the test terminal and periodically checking login information for the test terminal.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein completing the site optimization comprises:
Generating a site site optimization status based on a site site optimization result; And
Further comprising the step of displaying the test site optimization status step by step when receiving an inquiry request for the test site optimization status.
6. The method of claim 5,
(e) if the test conformance to the test terminal is determined to be inadequate, transmitting the non-conformity assessment information to the test site management terminal.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein step (e)
Receiving a test suitability re-determination request from the test site management terminal for the test terminal; And
Further comprising the step of determining an actual schedule for the test suitability re-determination request and notifying the real manager of the test.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein step (e)
Determining whether the non-conformity of the test terminal with the nonconformity evaluation information is solved; And
Further comprising authenticating the test site to the test site management terminal if the nonconformity to the test terminal is solved.
A test site management server for managing a network-based test environment,
An optimization scheduling unit for determining a site optimization schedule based on the site environment information associated with the test terminal and notifying the optimization optimizer of the site optimization schedule;
A network testing unit for performing a network test with the test terminal during the optimization schedule to generate a network test result;
An optimization decision information receiving unit for receiving optimization decision information for the test terminal generated through an optimization decision agent managed by the optimization inspectors within a specific period from the optimization schedule;
And a test suitability determining unit for determining whether to optimize the test site based on the generated network test result and the received optimization decision information,
15. The method of claim 14,
And a test site environment information receiving unit for receiving test site environment information associated with the test terminal in the test site from the test site management terminal.

Images