KR20060040997A - Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein - Google Patents
Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20060040997A KR20060040997A KR1020040090300A KR20040090300A KR20060040997A KR 20060040997 A KR20060040997 A KR 20060040997A KR 1020040090300 A KR1020040090300 A KR 1020040090300A KR 20040090300 A KR20040090300 A KR 20040090300A KR 20060040997 A KR20060040997 A KR 20060040997A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- plate
- slab
- bridge
- lattice bar
- concrete
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D19/00—Structural or constructional details of bridges
- E01D19/12—Grating or flooring for bridges; Fastening railway sleepers or tracks to bridges
- E01D19/125—Grating or flooring for bridges
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D21/00—Methods or apparatus specially adapted for erecting or assembling bridges
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D2101/00—Material constitution of bridges
- E01D2101/20—Concrete, stone or stone-like material
- E01D2101/24—Concrete
- E01D2101/26—Concrete reinforced
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D2101/00—Material constitution of bridges
- E01D2101/20—Concrete, stone or stone-like material
- E01D2101/24—Concrete
- E01D2101/26—Concrete reinforced
- E01D2101/268—Composite concrete-metal
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method of constructing a bridge slab and a lattice bar deck type PC plate to be applied to the method. The PC plate includes a plate body which is manufactured so as to maintain its own compressive strength not less than the compressive strength of the slab, And a truss frame partially formed on the upper surface of the plate body. The method includes applying a plurality of girders in parallel between the upper surfaces of the bridge piers, A plurality of cross beams are formed at a predetermined interval therebetween, and then the PC plates are pulled and carried by the work platform car and are installed adjacent to and in parallel to the upper part. Reinforcement is placed on the upper part of the cross beams, And according to the present invention, when the construction is performed, It is possible to improve the work efficiency and to improve the work efficiency by eliminating the troubles in the process and risk of safety accidents due to the installation and removal of the fountain and the operation platform, So that the strength of the bridge can be further improved, but the advantage of being able to visually identify the broken state of the bridge immediately as in the conventional case can be exhibited as it is.
Bridges, slabs, bridge overhead work, precast, PC plate, lattice bar deck
Description
1 is a perspective view showing an example of a bridge structure by the construction method of the present invention.
FIGS. 2A to 2D are views sequentially showing respective processes according to an exemplary method of constructing a bridge slab of the present invention,
FIG. 2A is a first process in a state in which a plurality of girders are mounted on an upper portion of a pier,
FIG. 2B is a second process diagram showing a process for installing a crossbeam by installing a work truck on an upper portion of the girder, pulling a cross beam form therebetween, and installing concrete thereon. FIG.
FIG. 2C is a third process showing the process of installing the PC plate (Precast Concrete Plate) of the present invention in the upper opening formed by the girder and the cross beam,
FIG. 2D is a fourth process diagram showing a state in which a work truck installed above the girder is disassembled, a reinforcing bar is laid, and concrete is installed to cure the slab integrally with the PC plate.
3 is a longitudinal sectional view of a bridge showing a structure of a composite slab completed by the construction method of the present invention.
4 is a perspective view illustrating a structure of a PC plate applied to a method of constructing a bridge slab of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view showing the internal structure of the PC plate according to the present invention cut in the plane direction.
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along line A-A of the PC plate according to the present invention as shown in FIG.
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line B-B of FIG. 4 showing the PC plate according to the present invention.
8 is a schematic longitudinal cross-sectional view illustrating the structure of a conventional artificial concrete specimen produced to perform a performance comparison test for a PC plate composite slab of the present invention and a PC plate synthetic concrete specimen of the present invention, respectively.
9 is a composite graph showing the load-displacement relationship according to the results of static fracture tests for the conventional spot-buried concrete specimens and the PC-plate composite concrete specimens of the present invention, respectively.
Description of the Related Art
a; The spacing b of the pair of bottom roots; Spacing between lower muscle and main muscle
D; Total thickness of composite slab D1; Plate body thickness
P;
2 ;
3a;
10;
12; Crane 13; wire
20;
22; A
23; Lattice bar (exposed bars) 24; Kang Hyun
25;
The present invention relates to a method of constructing a bridge slab and a lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied thereto. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method of constructing a concrete slab, It is possible to minimize the number of safety accidents such as falling due to a failure due to no need to work on the operation scaffold and to improve the efficiency of work by shortening the process In addition, it is possible to improve the performance of bridges by applying high-strength PC plates according to the proven design criteria through experiments, and to realize a bridge slab construction method And a lattice bar deck type PC plate applied thereto.
The structure of a general bridge includes a plurality of piers which are arranged on a ground at regular intervals, a girder which is arranged in parallel in a horizontal direction at regular intervals between the upper surfaces of the adjacent piers, A cross beam formed orthogonally at regular intervals between adjacent girders for reinforcing the deflection of the girder and a slab cured by being placed on the girder.
The girder is a prestressed concrete beam or a steel box which is constructed to withstand the lateral force (bending stress) due to the vertical pressure such as the weight and the weight of the slab, (Steel box) type beam structures. In the case of the concrete beam, a cross beam formwork is installed in an orthogonal direction at predetermined intervals therebetween, and then reinforced by curing the cross beam by pouring concrete. In addition, in order to construct a slab corresponding to the upper construction of a bridge, a deck plate as a temporary bottom plate capable of placing concrete on the upper surface of the girder is to be installed.
The former is constructed by using slabs and plywood, but recently it has been used as a part of a precast concrete plate, which is a part of the slab placed on the site and does not need to be removed after completion. Is a trend that is being implemented.
Furthermore, when the cracks are generated in the aesthetic pipe after the construction or the concrete structure itself, the mold is troublesome in the process of dismantling and removing it in order to facilitate maintenance after being visually identified, The worker can move and work on the line by connecting the line. In consideration of the surrounding conditions, the worker can not use the footrest with a limited size (width). There was also a case where it would not be possible to provide a stable working environment that would protect valuable people.
Accordingly, various new technologies related to the above-mentioned PC plate synthesis have been proposed and disseminated in order to solve the above-mentioned problems of the slab construction method by such a mold installation. The term "precast" as used herein refers to a method of prefabricating a facility using a fixed facility and can be manufactured under optimal conditions, so that the accuracy (accuracy) and strength (strength) of a concrete product There is an advantage to be improved.
As an example of such a technique, Patent Application No. 2157, 1996, is available.
In the case of a steel box girder, in the case of a steel box girder, there are a plurality of rows of crown portions to be combined with the claw portions and anchor reinforcing bars to be described later, A plurality of stud bolts are fixedly formed on the upper surface of the girder, a plurality of stud bolts are provided on the upper and lower surfaces of the girder, A half slab (a lattice bar deck type PC plate) having pegs protruding in the horizontal direction at both ends thereof, and an anchor reinforcing bars inserted in the pegs, and a lattice bar (upper reinforcing bar) And a slab that is cured by being placed on the half slab. Other components include a non-slip stopper for the half slab, a packing for preventing penetration of the mortar into the main portion, a girder finishing plate, and a fastening bolt.
According to the above-described construction, the half slab having the claw portion manufactured in the field or factory is directly mounted on the girder, the upper connecting rope and the reinforcing bar are appropriately laid, After inserting reinforcing bars for anchors, concrete is placed in the upper part. That is, when the upper slab is cured, the claw portions and the anchor reinforcing bars are embedded in the interior of the slabs, and the reinforcing bars are integrally combined with each other.
However, the above-mentioned prior art has a disadvantage that the shape of the girder itself needs to be separately manufactured, and that the PC plate is required to have a complicated structure, shape and additional configuration for full synthesis with the slab, Particularly, there has been a serious problem that the PC plate is structurally fragile due to the formation of the recess to eliminate the installation interference.
In view of the above problems of the prior art, the applicant of the present invention has already been recognized as a patented technology by proposing a 'method of constructing a bridge slab and a PC plate applied thereto' in 2000 Patent Application No. 56002.
The registered patent of the applicant of the present application is a lattice bar deck type PC plate of a simple structure by a new arrangement design, which is not structurally weaker than the prior art and can be easily constructed using the existing structure as it is Method and structure. In addition, since the PC plate is designed to be broken before the slab by maintaining a compressive strength lower than the allowable compressive strength of the slab cured on the upper side, it is possible to visually identify and predict the cracks of the slab before the maintenance, It has an advantage that can be performed.
However, the present applicant's method of constructing a bridge slab according to the patent application and the PC plate applied thereto maintain a compressive strength lower than that of the slab in order to ensure visibility at the time of slab fatigue failure, There is a limit to strengthening to have greater strength.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in order to solve all of the above problems, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a method of manufacturing a concrete slab, It is possible to minimize the number of safety accidents such as a fall due to a failure due to the fact that work on the scaffold is unnecessary and it is possible to improve the efficiency of the work by shortening the process, It is possible to further improve the performance and stability of the bridge by applying the high strength PC plate according to the design standard, and in the case where fatigue breakage of the slab proceeds, cracking starts from the lower PC plate, It is possible to take prompt action such as maintenance work for large-scale accident such as bridge collapse And a lattice bar deck type PC plate applied to the slab construction method.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of constructing a bridge slab, comprising: placing a plurality of girders at equal intervals in parallel between upper surfaces of adjacent bridge piers installed at predetermined intervals, After the beam is formed, a plurality of lattice bar-type PC plates separately pre-cast to a predetermined size and number are towed and transported by a work platform car, The method of
In addition, as a preceding step before the installation of the PC plate, it is preferable that the contact between the girder and the PC plate is performed so that the PC plate can be stuck to each other while maintaining a sufficient contact area for stably installing the PC plate from the upper surface of the girder It is preferable that the method further comprises a step of coating and interposing the mortar to an appropriate thickness on the surface.
In order to achieve the above object, a lattice bar deck type PC plate for constructing a bridge slab according to the present invention is designed so as to maintain its own compressive strength not less than the compressive strength of a slab, and is manufactured in a pre- A plurality of main rods and a plurality of reinforcing bars embedded in the plate body so as to be orthogonal to each other at a predetermined interval in the longitudinal direction and the width direction; And a plurality of truss frames formed by partially embedding and partially protruding from the upper surface of the plate body.
Here, the compressive strength of the plate body is preferably formed so as to maintain the compressive strength of the slab greater than or equal to the compressive strength of the slab when forming a specific numerical value within a range of 270 to 400 kgf / cm 2 .
The thickness of the plate body is preferably at least 50 mm, but not more than 60% of the composite slab thickness.
The truss structure may include two lower end roots arranged at predetermined intervals on both sides of the main roots laid out at the center thereof and spaced apart at a predetermined height from a central upper portion between the pair of lower roots, And a lattice bar which is exposed to the outside of the upper surface of the body along the longitudinal direction of the body, and the lower and upper lattice bars and the triangular structure formed by the pair of lower lattice bars, And the lattice bar are formed so as to form an integral truss structure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, a method of constructing a bridge slab according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention and a lattice bar deck type PC plate applied thereto will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
1 to 9 illustrate a method of constructing a bridge slab according to the present invention and test specimens and experimental results for a performance comparison test of a lattice bar deck type PC plate P and a PC plate composite slab applied thereto, 2A to 2D are views sequentially showing respective processes according to an example of the method of constructing a bridge slab of the present invention. FIG. 2A is a cross-sectional view of the
The structure of the bridge completed by the construction method of the present invention is similar to that of a general bridge as shown in Fig. A plurality of
The bridge slab construction method using the lattice bar deck type PC plate of the present invention is widely applied to all girder bridges such as prestressed concrete beam (PSC beam), PSC girder, and steel box girder can do. As described in the above-described prior arts, the protrusions on the upper surface of the girder (concrete beam) and the clamping jaws, the supporting jaws of the corresponding PC plate, the separate plates for fixing the PC plate, the stud bolts and the fastening bolts (For studs, stud bolts, fastening bolts, etc.), and for the hooks and anchors on both sides of the PC plate for firm coupling between the recesses and the connecting jaws and slabs on both sides of the bottom of the PC plate A reinforcing bar, a packing for preventing penetration of the mortar into the lumber, and a stopper for preventing slipping of the PC plate, and the like.
It should be noted that the most important point in the present invention is that the strength of the lattice bar deck type PC plate P should be equal to or more than the strength of the
The main design criteria of the lattice bar deck type PC plate P according to the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to FIGS. 3 to 7. FIG.
First, the height of the
3, the thickness D1 of the
In order to realize the PC plate P with a minimum thickness, it is required to maintain a high strength and at least a strength equal to or higher than that of the
4 to 7, the PC plate P according to the present invention is designed so as to maintain its own compressive strength not less than the compressive strength of the
In the above structure, the compressive strength of the
The
The distance a between a pair of
Hereinafter, experiments for confirming the validity of the slab construction method using the lattice bar deck type PC plate according to the present invention and results derived therefrom will be described. This experiment was conducted by Chonnam National University and Honam University after constructing Task Task Team. This experiment was conducted to verify that the bridge slab constructed using the lattice bar deck type PC plate of the present invention has superior performance to that of the existing slant concrete slabs. Under the same conditions, four cast concrete specimens and five Static fracture experiments on PC - plate composite concrete specimens and dynamic fracture tests by cyclic loading on these specimens were carried out, respectively, and the performance differences between the existing slabs and the composite slabs were compared.
As a result of these tests, the composite slabs according to the present invention were found to have superior stiffness (yield strength) with respect to yield load, fracture load and dynamic load.
All the static and dynamic fracture tests related to the present invention were carried out using a two-point loading method after a specimen having a ratio of inter-leaflet to effective height ratio of 6 was produced. The support points were located 150 mm inside from both ends of the specimen, and the two load points were loaded at the center of the specimen at intervals of 300 mm. The displacement was measured at the center of each specimen. As shown in FIG. 8, three specimens of Field Concrete (FC) specimens of length 3000 mm, width 600 mm, thickness (height) 250 mm, (PCP) composite concrete specimen is a structure in which three reinforcing bars are embedded at regular intervals in the longitudinal direction of the specimen at a position of a length of 3000 mm, a width of 600 mm, a thickness (height) of 250 mm, Respectively. H16 and H22 were used for the compression reinforcement (upper reinforcing bars) and tensile reinforcing bars (lower reinforcing bars) respectively, and the compression ratio and tensile reinforcing ratio of the FC specimens were 0.5% and 1.0%, respectively.
(1) Static fracture experiment of each specimen
First, the destruction experiments on the lattice bar deck type PC plate itself were preceded. As a result of the test of the breaking load applying the load of 460 kg to the above-mentioned PC plate, the PC plate was destroyed at 1,596 kg. Therefore, it is considered that there is no risk of cracking of the plate body when the floor plate is used by using the PC plate, and when an unexpected ultimate load is applied, the compression side steel wire Lattice bar) in addition to the serious damage of the plate body including the buckling of the plate body.
In addition, this experiment was carried out up to the point of destruction as a 2-point static load of 4 FC specimens and 5 PCP specimens, and the results of each experiment are summarized in Table 1 below. The static load-displacement curve between the concrete specimens is shown in Fig.
According to the above Table 1, the PCP composite specimen of the present invention showed an average 2.1 times increase in crack load and 1.42 times increase in yield load as compared with FC specimen. This phenomenon can be attributed to the use of lattice bars and high-strength concrete (plate body) of PCP composite specimens.
Further, in the static load-displacement curve of FIG. 9, the slope of the curve indicates the stiffness of each specimen. From the above graph, the stiffness estimated by each load step of each FC and PCP composite specimen is numerically represented as shown in Table 2 below. Here, the slope of each curve is estimated by selecting four intervals between the crack load and the yield load.
As a result, the stiffness of the PCP composite specimen increases by 14.5% on average compared with the FC specimen, which is also attributable to the use of the lattice bar and high strength concrete of the PCP composite specimen. That is, from the structural point of view, the lattice bar functions to increase resistance to compression, bending, shearing force, etc. due to a hypothetical load.
In addition, as an example of experimental results for an optimized compression strength between the upper slab and the lower precast concrete plate, the compression strength of a slab compression strength of the precast concrete plate when 270kgf / cm 2 was found adequate to keep the 400kgf / cm 2.
(2) Dynamic fracture test by repeated load of each specimen
In this experiment, the dynamic stiffness of each specimen can be evaluated by repeatedly loading the same size loads up to the time of destruction for four FC specimens and five PCP specimen specimens.
According to a paper by Park Young-hoon, presented at the 1994 conference, it was concluded that the repetition frequency of fatigue fracture exceeded 300,000 times when repeatedly applying the fatigue load corresponding to 60% of the static fracture load in the concrete beam . Therefore, in the present experiment, it was confirmed that the PCP composite specimen was able to maintain a cyclic fatigue limit of 300,000 times or more (equivalent to 60% of the static fracture load value of the PCP synthetic specimen) to each FC and PCP synthetic specimen The performance evaluation is made possible by comparing the number of repeated load loads up to the time of each fatigue failure.
Table 3 below shows the static failure loads and their mean values for each FC and PCP composite specimen. Since the cyclic fatigue load corresponding to 60% of the static fracture load of the PCP composite specimen according to the data in the above [Table 3] is 17 tons, when the ratio of the cyclic fatigue load to the average static fracture load of the PCP synthetic specimen is 60% The ratio of the cyclic fatigue load to the average static fracture load of the FC specimen corresponds to 77.5%.
As a result of this dynamic fracture test, the FC specimens were destroyed at an average of 61,222 times, and the PCP synthetic specimens were destroyed at an average of 323,685 times, respectively. As a result, the PCP synthetic specimens showed much better performance than the FC specimens for repeated fatigue loads. This is due to the decrease in the tensile stress occurring in the main bars (tensile bars) 22 inside the PC plate, as mentioned in the static fracture test results. According to this experiment, since the PCP composite specimen exhibits a typical flexural fracture progress due to the dynamic cyclic loading, the fracture (slip phenomenon) due to fatigue accumulation at the interface between the PC plate (P) and the slab (4) There was no fear of the problem.
The results of the static and dynamic fracture tests of PCP composite specimens as described above are summarized as follows.
First, in comparison of static loading test results, PCC composite concrete specimens showed significantly higher flexural strength (stiffness) compared with the specimens placed in the field, and the tensile reinforcement (lower reinforcing steel) The tensile strength was also significantly smaller than that of the concrete specimens. This can be seen as an effect of the additional reinforcement of reinforced concrete and reinforced concrete of the PC plate.
Secondly, in the dynamic fracture experiment by repeated loading of the same load, PC plate synthetic concrete specimens were destroyed on average 323,685 times, whereas specimens placed in the field were destroyed on average 61,222 times. This fatigue test result suggests that the PC plate synthetic concrete slab has far superior performance to the on-site concrete slab.
Third, unlike the initial concern that the PC-plate composite concrete slab will reveal its weakness at the interface between the PC plate and the slab, no cracks occurred at the interface as shown in the static and dynamic fracture test results . This means that the slip phenomenon does not occur at the interface between the PC plate and the slab and the complete synthetic behavior is being performed.
Fourth, according to the results of the actual construction and the results of this experiment, even if the lower PC plates maintaining a higher compressive strength than the upper slab are integrally formed, cracks are generated from the PC plate at the time of fatigue failure, Visual identification was possible.
An example of a method of constructing a bridge slab according to the present invention using a PC plate P having a structure as shown in the above experiments will now be described with reference to the respective process views of FIGS. 2A to 2D.
First, in a factory, a pre-casting step (pre-casting step) of pre-casting a PC plate (P) of concrete material to be installed on a girder (2) . That is, in the pre-casting step, a plurality of reinforcing
On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 2A, a plurality of
After the
After all of the plurality of
As shown in FIG. 2d, the
As described above, according to the method of constructing the bridge slab to which the PC plate according to the present invention is applied, the formwork and the operation footplate are installed at the time of constructing the slab at the upper part of the bridge to cure the concrete, Since it is unnecessary to work on the scaffolding, it is possible to minimize the safety accidents such as falling due to the scuffle, and the construction period is shortened by about 50 to 70% as compared with the conventional method using the formwork, As a result, the efficiency of the work can be improved, and the construction cost can be reduced by 15% or more.
In addition, according to the present invention, it is possible to improve the performance and stability of a bridge by applying a high-strength PC plate according to a proven design standard through experiments, and to improve the performance and stability of a bridge, when fatigue failure of the slab progresses, Since cracks can be recognized and visually recognized, there is a variety of advantages such that maintenance work such as maintenance work can be performed quickly, thereby preventing large accidents such as collapse of bridges.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is to be understood that such equivalent embodiments are also intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the true scope of protection of the present invention should be determined only by the appended claims.
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR20040090300A KR100635137B1 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2004-11-08 | Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein |
CN2005800381252A CN101057039B (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2005-05-11 | Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein |
PCT/KR2005/001374 WO2006049377A1 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2005-05-11 | Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied thereto |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR20040090300A KR100635137B1 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2004-11-08 | Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR20-2004-0032398U Division KR200375113Y1 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2004-11-16 | Lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate for bridge slab construction |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20060040997A true KR20060040997A (en) | 2006-05-11 |
KR100635137B1 KR100635137B1 (en) | 2006-10-17 |
Family
ID=36319359
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR20040090300A KR100635137B1 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2004-11-08 | Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR100635137B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101057039B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006049377A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20090007052A (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2009-01-16 | 최재옥 | Bridge slab construction method without support |
KR100978882B1 (en) * | 2007-11-13 | 2010-08-31 | 지에스건설 주식회사 | Cantilever precast deckplate for composite slab and bridge construction method using the same |
CN104294751A (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2015-01-21 | 安徽建工集团有限公司 | Reinforcing structure for cross section of large-span prestressed concrete box girder |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101045929B1 (en) | 2010-10-27 | 2011-07-01 | 홍석희 | Pro-environment prestressed long span light-weight precast concrete panel and this construction technique |
CN102011364B (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2012-02-29 | 长安大学 | Integral prefabricated cross-laminated timber (CLT) wooden plate girder bridge based on steel side stiffening |
IT1404293B1 (en) * | 2011-02-02 | 2013-11-22 | D S D Dezi Steel Design S R L | METHOD FOR THE REALIZATION OF BRIDGE VARIABLE THICKNESS IN REINFORCED CONCRETE. |
KR101101208B1 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2012-01-04 | (주) 효성 | Precast deckplate for cantilever construction and slab construction method using the same |
CN102507248B (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2013-12-18 | 上海同豪土木工程咨询有限公司 | Method for testing whether bridge bearing has void |
KR101954155B1 (en) | 2018-06-07 | 2019-03-05 | 컨텍이앤씨 주식회사 | Bridge with full-deck and protective wall, and construction method for the same |
KR102257540B1 (en) | 2019-09-17 | 2021-05-31 | 한밭대학교 산학협력단 | Truss composite precast deck plate and construction method using it |
CN112832117A (en) * | 2021-01-05 | 2021-05-25 | 中交路桥建设有限公司 | Connecting method of prefabricated box girder and transition layer and prefabricated box girder structure |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4282619A (en) * | 1979-11-16 | 1981-08-11 | Havens Steel Company | Truss structure |
US5425152A (en) * | 1992-08-14 | 1995-06-20 | Teron International Building Technologies Ltd. | Bridge construction |
KR100194083B1 (en) * | 1996-01-30 | 1999-06-15 | 이영선 | Top plate mounting structure of bridge |
GB2367526B (en) * | 2000-10-03 | 2004-09-15 | Intelligent Engineering | Sandwich plate panels |
JP3176309B2 (en) * | 1997-03-10 | 2001-06-18 | 飛島建設株式会社 | Precast concrete slab for bridge structure and joining method thereof |
JP2001011821A (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2001-01-16 | Kondo Kozai Kk | Space truss with provisional concrete form for civil engineering work such as bridge floor |
KR100403989B1 (en) * | 2000-09-23 | 2003-11-01 | (주)천일기술단 | Bridge slab construction method and precast concrete plate applied therein |
-
2004
- 2004-11-08 KR KR20040090300A patent/KR100635137B1/en active IP Right Grant
-
2005
- 2005-05-11 WO PCT/KR2005/001374 patent/WO2006049377A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-05-11 CN CN2005800381252A patent/CN101057039B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20090007052A (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2009-01-16 | 최재옥 | Bridge slab construction method without support |
KR100978882B1 (en) * | 2007-11-13 | 2010-08-31 | 지에스건설 주식회사 | Cantilever precast deckplate for composite slab and bridge construction method using the same |
CN104294751A (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2015-01-21 | 安徽建工集团有限公司 | Reinforcing structure for cross section of large-span prestressed concrete box girder |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2006049377A1 (en) | 2006-05-11 |
KR100635137B1 (en) | 2006-10-17 |
CN101057039B (en) | 2010-11-24 |
CN101057039A (en) | 2007-10-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9657494B2 (en) | Method for producing a tower construction from reinforced concrete | |
KR101237000B1 (en) | Precast concrete panel construction technique | |
JP5937898B2 (en) | Construction method of box girder bridge | |
JP2013530322A (en) | REINFORCING METHOD AND REINFORCING DEVICE FOR REINFORCING AND WEIGHTING FLOOR AND ROOF FRAME STRUCTURE | |
KR100635137B1 (en) | Bridge slab construction method and lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate applied therein | |
KR101222620B1 (en) | Prestressed concrete girder and it's manufacture and construction method which used pretensioning steel plate | |
KR101170922B1 (en) | The rahmen bridge construction technique for which tendon and the connection support stand was used | |
KR100982974B1 (en) | Method for manufacturing multi-span continuous re-prestressed preflex composite bridge | |
JP6517123B2 (en) | T-girder installation method | |
KR20160115602A (en) | Method of replacing bridge deck slab and prestressed concrete girder assembly used therein | |
KR200406615Y1 (en) | T shape precast concrete panel | |
JP3877995B2 (en) | How to build a string string bridge | |
KR20100123405A (en) | Structure for filling-up a steel reinforced concrete on h shaped section steel in slab bridge | |
KR100949584B1 (en) | Pre-cast concrete elments and construction method using thereof for upper portion of bridge | |
JPH0782709A (en) | Reinforcing method for concrete structure, employing hollow pc steel bar | |
KR100775359B1 (en) | Concrete-mold assembly and construction method using the same | |
CN111794074B (en) | Arch bridge concrete beam and beam forming method thereof | |
KR100403989B1 (en) | Bridge slab construction method and precast concrete plate applied therein | |
JP3945668B2 (en) | Construction method of concrete pier | |
KR100467647B1 (en) | The repair and reinforcement method for a bridge | |
KR200375113Y1 (en) | Lattice bar deck-shaped precast concrete plate for bridge slab construction | |
KR100588350B1 (en) | Bridge slab construction method for the median strip side end of the slab and upper part bracket applied therein | |
KR20130090455A (en) | Construction method for continuous bridge using confined concrete | |
KR20130103970A (en) | Concrete deck slab assembly, method for making the same and temporary bridge using the same | |
KR101172442B1 (en) | Construction method for girder using confined concrete |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
N231 | Notification of change of applicant | ||
N231 | Notification of change of applicant | ||
A302 | Request for accelerated examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E701 | Decision to grant or registration of patent right | ||
GRNT | Written decision to grant | ||
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20121008 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20131010 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20141010 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20150924 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20161010 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20170918 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20181008 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
J301 | Trial decision |
Free format text: TRIAL NUMBER: 2017100002784; TRIAL DECISION FOR INVALIDATION REQUESTED 20170831 Effective date: 20190123 |
|
J121 | Written withdrawal of request for trial | ||
J122 | Written withdrawal of action (patent court) | ||
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20191010 Year of fee payment: 14 |