KR20010044657A - System for speaking proficiency tests - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: A system for evaluating speaking ability is provided to transmit and store an answer file composed of a motion picture and sound, and then to allow an estimator to grade a plurality of answers at the same time. CONSTITUTION: An evaluation server receives a request for an answer list of a data of examination from an evaluation member(S2001), extracts questions corresponding to the date of examination and the evaluation member from a question data base and answer files of each questions from an answer/record data base(S2003). If a request for evaluating an answer to a specific question is received(S2005), the server transmits an answer file corresponding to the specific question to the evaluation member(S2007). If a grades that the evaluation member grades the answer file is received(S2009), the server stores the grades as a record of an applicant who sent the answer in the answer/record data base(S2011). The server decides whether or not a request for evaluation on next answer file is received(S2005) and ends evaluation process in case the request is not received any longer.

Description

Speaking ability evaluation system {SYSTEM FOR SPEAKING PROFICIENCY TESTS}

The present invention relates to a network-based speaking ability evaluation method.

In the existing speaking ability evaluation method, a small number of judges test speaking ability in the form of one-on-one interviews with the test takers, and thus, a large amount of time, cost, and labor are required to score a large number of test takers' answers.

In addition, the existing speech ability evaluation method has a problem in that the process of providing a problem for one problem and receiving the answer repeatedly because of the interview format.

In addition, the existing speaking ability evaluation method has a limitation of time and place by taking the test in the same place and evaluating the answers.

Therefore, in the present invention, after answering the candidate's video and voice answer files are transmitted to the evaluation server and stored, the evaluator assesses the speaking ability of the network-based answer batch scoring method in which a plurality of answers to a single question are scored. To provide a method, an apparatus and a system corresponding to the method.

Another object of the present invention is to save the answers of a plurality of respondents in the answer file such as video, voice, etc. to continue to see and hear a plurality of answers to a single question for scoring the time required to score the answers of multiple candidates The present invention provides a method for evaluating speaking ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method that reduces costs and labor, and an apparatus and system corresponding to the method.

Another object of the present invention is a network-based answer batch that is not stored in the interview format but an answer file is generated through a candidate device having an image input means and a voice input means, and is transmitted to an evaluation server for scoring the answer file and stored in a database. The present invention provides a scoring method for evaluating speaking ability and an apparatus and system corresponding to the method.

Still another object of the present invention is a method for evaluating speaking ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method capable of collectively scoring stored answers after checking and testing a candidate through a network without time and place restrictions, and an apparatus corresponding to the method. And to provide a system.

1 is a block diagram of a system for assessing speech ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

2 is a block diagram of a system for evaluating speaking ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

3 is a block diagram of a problem reproducing terminal according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 4 is a block diagram of a problem providing module according to an embodiment of the present invention.

5 is a block diagram of an answer processing module according to an embodiment of the present invention.

6 is an exemplary view of a screen of a general question type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 7 shows an example of a screen of an image (still image) problem type according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

8 is an exemplary view of a screen of a character problem type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

9 is a diagram illustrating a video problem type according to an embodiment of the present invention.

10 is a view showing the configuration of a screen for registering as a member of the speech ability evaluation server of the answer batch scoring method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a screen for setting an evaluation service problem type and requesting a problem according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG.

12 is a view showing the configuration of a screen for setting the evaluation committee member for each problem of the speaking ability test according to an embodiment of the present invention.

13 is a diagram showing the configuration of a speaking ability answer batch scoring list screen for the evaluator according to an embodiment of the present invention.

14 is a view showing the configuration of the speech ability answer batch scoring screen for the evaluation member according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 15a is a flow chart of the speech ability assessment service of the answer batch batch scoring method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 15b is a flow diagram of a speech ability assessment service of the answer batch batch scoring method according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

16 is a flowchart illustrating a process of registering a member in a system for evaluating speaking ability of an answer batch scoring method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

17 is a flowchart illustrating a process of setting an evaluation service problem type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

18 is a flowchart illustrating a process of providing a problem to a speaking ability test candidate through a network according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

19 is a flowchart illustrating a process of setting a member for evaluating a question-specific answer according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

20 is a flowchart illustrating a process of collectively scoring a speech ability answer by an evaluator according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 21 is a block diagram of a system for evaluating speaking ability of the answer batch scoring system according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

22 is a diagram showing the configuration of a problem providing module for a client according to an embodiment of the present invention.

23 is an overall flowchart of a speech ability evaluation service of the answer batch batch scoring method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

24 is a flowchart illustrating a process of providing a problem to a speaking ability test candidate by a problem providing module for a client according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

25 is an exemplary view of a speaking ability evaluation screen according to an embodiment of the present invention.

26 and 27 illustrate exemplary candidate acceptance screens registered by a receptionist in accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention.

28 is a view showing an adult basic question according to an embodiment of the present invention.

29 is a view showing the basic questions for elementary school according to an embodiment of the present invention.

<Explanation of symbols for main parts of drawing>

101: evaluation server 103: problem provision module

105: answer processing module 107: database server

109: Problem Database 111: Member Database

113: answer / transcript database 115: network

117: branch server 127: transceiver

119: Manager 121: Evaluation Committee

123: Candidate 2101: Candidate Computer

2103: Problem Provisioning Module for Clients

According to an aspect of the present invention to achieve the above objects, in the evaluation server to provide the assessment of the assessment ability of the answer batch scoring method over the network, receiving a question-specific answer list request from the evaluator, the evaluation Extract at least one list of answers corresponding to the committee, wherein the list of answers includes at least one candidate answer file, and send the extracted list of answers to the panel, wherein the answer file is the panel Can be provided in the form of a video and audio is reproduced in the form of at least one of the evaluation member is evaluated by the evaluator can provide a method for evaluating the speech ability of the batch scoring method, apparatus and server corresponding to the method.

In a preferred embodiment, the method for evaluating speaking ability in the batch answering method of the answering step includes: receiving a score by the evaluator evaluating the answer file; and receiving the score on the answer / transcript database coupled to the evaluation server. The method may further include storing. Here, the received evaluation score may be stored in an answer / transcript database coupled to the test taker corresponding to the answer file and coupled to the evaluation server.

In another preferred embodiment, the method for evaluating speaking ability of the answer batch scoring method may further include extracting at least one problem corresponding to the evaluator. Here, the question-specific answer list request includes a test run date, and the extracted problem corresponds to the test run date.

In another preferred embodiment, the extracted answer list may be included in the speech ability evaluation screen and transmitted to the evaluator.

In another preferred embodiment, the method for evaluating speaking proficiency in the answer batch scoring method comprises: receiving a question request including at least one of a question type, a question level, and a question number from at least one candidate; Extracting a problem corresponding to at least one of the problem type and the problem level from the problem database associated with the evaluation server according to the number of questions, and generating a speech ability problem screen including the extracted problem to generate the at least one candidate Transmitting to the at least one candidate, receiving the answer file from the at least one candidate, and storing the answer file in an answer / transcript database associated with the assessment server. In this case, the problem may be extracted randomly, and the received answer file may have at least one of a video recording and a voice recording. In addition, the answer file is received from the test taker device corresponding to the test taker, the test taker device voice output means for reproducing the voice corresponding to the problem, voice input means for recording the voice of the candidate and the voice input means Data processing means for generating the answer file by processing the voice received through the data; image output means for reproducing a video corresponding to the extracted problem; image input means for recording the expression and behavior of the candidate; and Data processing means for generating the answer file by processing the video received through the image input means.

In another preferred embodiment, the extracted problem type may include at least one of a general question type, an image problem type, a text problem type, and a moving image problem type.

In another preferred embodiment, the type of extracted problem may be preset by the candidate or set in real time by the candidate.

In another preferred embodiment, the candidate may be registered in advance on the evaluation server. In addition, the evaluator may be preset according to the extracted problem.

In another preferred embodiment, the evaluation server is interworked with at least one branch server through the network, wherein the at least one branch server comprises at least one of a question type, a problem level and a number of questions from at least one candidate. Receiving a request, transmitting the problem request to the evaluation server, receiving a speech ability problem screen including a problem corresponding to the problem request from the evaluation server, the at least one speaking ability problem screen The step of transmitting to the candidate of the, receiving the recorded, recorded answer file from the candidate, and transmitting the answer file to the evaluation server.

According to another aspect of the present invention, in the problem providing module for the client provided in the test taker device connected through the network with the evaluation server, the problem request from the test taker is provided in providing the speech ability evaluation of the answer batch scoring method. Receiving, extracting a problem corresponding to the problem request from a problem database for a client interworking with the problem providing module for the client, playing the extracted problem in at least one of a video and a voice on the candidate device; Receive an answer file recorded and recorded in response to the question from a candidate, and transmit the answer file to the evaluation server, wherein the evaluation server includes at least the answer file to the evaluator corresponding to the extracted question Send a list, and the answer file is above the assessment Is received to be able to provide video, is reproduced in the form of a voice speaking the answer batch scoring system from the client characterized in that the evaluation by the evaluation committee performance evaluation method, apparatus and recording media corresponding to the method.

In a preferred embodiment, the problem request may include at least one of a problem type, a problem level and a question number, wherein the problem corresponds to at least one of the problem type and the problem level and is extracted by the number of questions.

In another preferred embodiment, the method for evaluating speaking ability of a batch answering method in the client may include generating a speaking ability problem screen including the extracted problem, and the generated speaking ability problem screen may be displayed on the candidate device. The method may further include reproducing at least one of the voices.

In another preferred embodiment, the method for evaluating speaking ability of the answer batch scoring method in the client may further include storing the received answer file in an answer storage linked to the problem providing module for the client.

In another preferred embodiment, the evaluation server receives a score for evaluating the answer file by the evaluator and stores the received score in an answer / grade database coupled to the evaluation server. Here, the evaluation score is stored in the answer / score database coupled to the test taker and coupled to the evaluation server.

In another preferred embodiment, the answer file is included in the speaking ability evaluation screen is to be transmitted to the evaluator.

In another preferred embodiment, the candidate apparatus further comprises: a voice output means for reproducing a voice corresponding to the problem, a voice input means for recording a voice of the candidate, and a voice received through the voice input means to process the answer Data processing means for generating a file may be provided. Or the test taker device processes image data by reproducing a video corresponding to the extracted problem, image input means for recording the expression and behavior of the test taker, and a video received through the image input means to process the answer file. It may further comprise a data processing means for generating.

In another preferred embodiment, the extracted problem type may include at least one of a general question type, an image problem type, a text problem type, and a moving image problem type, which may be preset by the candidate or set in real time. Can be.

In another preferred embodiment, the evaluator may be preset in correspondence with the extracted problem.

Next, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 is a block diagram of a system for assessing speech ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, the evaluation server 101 includes a problem providing module 103 and an answer processing module 105. The database server 107 coupled with the evaluation server 101 includes a question database 109, a member database 111, and an answer / transcript database 113.

The evaluation server 101 according to the present invention may not evaluate the speaking ability evaluation in real time, but may allow the evaluation member to evaluate the candidate's answer file by providing a time difference. In other words, the evaluation server 101 does not provide the answer file presented by the candidate to the evaluator immediately after the candidate presents the answer file, but provides the evaluator with a time difference. In this way, it is possible to solve the geographical problem in which the evaluator is located. That is, when the evaluator resides abroad, the candidate's answer file may be provided to the evaluator separately from the examination time.

The evaluation server 101 may provide the evaluator with only the answer file of each of the plurality of questions for each candidate, or provide the evaluator with each of the plurality of questions and the answer file. The evaluator may efficiently evaluate the speaking ability of a particular candidate by using a specific test taker answer file or a specific test taker question and answer file provided by the above method.

In addition, the evaluation server 101 may provide the evaluator with only the answer file of each of the plurality of test takers for each specific problem, rather than by the test taker, or provide the evaluator with the specific question and the answer file of each of the plurality of test takers. The evaluator may evaluate the speaking ability of the plurality of test takers by a specific problem using an answer file of a plurality of test takers by a specific problem or a specific problem and answer file provided by the above method. By this method, in evaluating the speaking ability of a plurality of test takers for a specific problem, the evaluation time can be dramatically shortened.

The plurality of branch servers 117a, 117b, ..., 117n (hereinafter referred to as 117) connected through the evaluation server 101 and the network 115 are the test takers 123a, 123b, ... 123n, referred to as 123 below. And a transmitting / receiving unit (127a, 127b, ..., 127n, hereinafter 127) for receiving and transmitting data between and the evaluation server 101.

The manager 119 and the evaluator 121 connect to the evaluation server 101 through the network 115.

When the test taker 123 performs an autonomous ability test through the evaluation server 101, the test taker 123 may register as a member of the evaluation server 101 and log in with a member ID to perform a speaking ability test.

However, if the speaking proficiency test provided by the evaluation server 123 is conducted to provide an authorized evaluation score or certificate, in addition to the simple member ID and password input, the certified school, branch (hereinafter, the certified school, branch) Can only be tested by the candidate's device in the center.

In the case where the test taker speaks at the center, the tester registers instead of the tester himself / herself at the time of test registration. In this case, the registration screen of the acceptor is also sent to the evaluation server as an attached file.

When the speaking test is performed at the center, a unique candidate certification identifier is assigned to the apparatus (computer, etc.) on which the candidate is seated by the center and the evaluation server. In other words, the candidate will take a speaking test at an accredited center and will receive a score report in the form of a report card.

2 is a block diagram of a system for evaluating speaking ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, the configuration of the speaking proficiency evaluation system using the Internet or the dedicated line shown in FIG. 2 is similar to that of the speaking proficiency evaluation system shown in FIG. 1. In FIG. 2, the candidate 123 and the evaluation server 101 transmit and receive data and information via the Internet 201 without the branch server 117.

3 is a block diagram of a problem reproducing terminal according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 3, the candidate device 301 may include an audio output unit 311 such as a speaker that reproduces a problem transmitted from the evaluation server 101 by voice, and an image output unit such as a monitor that reproduces the problem as an image ( 303). The examinee apparatus 301 uses a voice input unit 309 such as a microphone for inputting a voice that the test taker 123 answers to the problem, and an image input unit 313 such as an image camera for recording a screen that the test taker 123 answers. Equipped.

When the device 303, 309, 311, or 313 is provided and the problem reproduced by the test taker 123 is recorded and recorded, the data processing device 305 of the test taker device 301 is recorded. ) Generates the recorded data recorded in the answer file and transmits to the evaluation server (101).

Figure 4 is a block diagram of a problem providing module according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 4, the problem providing module 103 included in the evaluation server 101 receives a problem request of the test taker 123, extracts a problem corresponding thereto, and transmits the problem to the test taker device 301.

The problem providing module 103 is composed of a transmitting unit 401, a receiving unit 403, an interface unit 405, a determination unit 407, a memory unit 409, and a problem extraction unit 411.

The transmitter 401 transmits the speaking ability problem extracted from the problem extractor 411 to the test taker 123.

The receiver 403 receives the information transmitted from the test taker 123 and transmits the information to the determination unit 407.

The interface unit 405 generates a speaking ability problem screen including a speaking ability problem and a time taken from the problem extracting unit 411.

The determination unit 407 determines whether or not the member ID inputted by the test taker 123 on the member registration screen of the evaluation server 101 and an error of data are determined.

In addition, the determination unit 407 transmits the speech ability problem data extracted from the problem extraction unit 411 to the interface unit 405 and the transmission unit 401.

The memory unit 409 stores information to be processed by the determination unit 407 and information for constructing a speech ability problem screen to be generated by the interface unit 405.

The problem extracting unit 411 stores the basic member information and the learning target information received from the test taker 123 in the member database 111, and the information such as the problem type, the problem level, and the number of questions received from the test taker 123. Stored in the problem database 109.

In addition, the problem extracting unit 411 corresponds to the problem database 109 coupled with the evaluation server 101, the learning target information set by the candidate 123 from the member database 111, the problem type, the problem level, and the number of problems. Extract speaking skills problems.

The problem providing module 103 may provide a plurality of questions in response to the problem request of the candidate 123. Candidate 123 must answer each of the plurality of questions provided. The answer may be presented by various multimedia methods such as recording or recording.

5 is a block diagram of an answer processing module according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 5, the answer processing module 105 provided in the evaluation server 101 receives an answer file of the test taker 123 and stores the answer file in the answer / transcript database 113 and corresponds to each evaluator 121. Compose the question-specific answers batch scoring screen to transmit to the evaluation member 121.

The answer processing module 105 is composed of a transmission unit 501, a reception unit 503, an interface unit 505, a determination unit 507, a memory unit 509, and a database extraction unit 511.

The transmitter 501 transmits the question-specific answer list extracted from the database extractor 511 to the evaluator 121.

The receiver 503 receives the information transmitted from the evaluator 121 and transmits the information to the determination unit 507.

The interface unit 505 generates a batch-by-question answer screen for each question using a plurality of evaluation committee and question-specific answer files extracted from the database extractor 511. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the interface unit 505 may generate a test taker evaluation screen for each test taker using an answer file for each test taker. In other words, the test taker evaluation screen does not allow the evaluator to evaluate the answer files of a plurality of test takers, but only the answer file of a particular test taker.

The determination unit 507 transfers the answer file extracted from the database extraction unit 511 to the interface unit 505 and the transmission unit 501, and determines an error of data and information.

The memory unit 509 stores information to be processed by the determination unit 507 and information for configuring a batch-by-question answer screen for each question to be generated by the interface unit 505. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the memory unit 509 may further store information for configuring the test taker batch evaluation screen to be generated by the interface unit 505.

The database extracting unit 511 stores the answer file received from the test taker 123 in the answer / results database 113 and stores the question-specific evaluation committee member information received from the manager 119 in the question database 109.

The database extracting unit 511 stores the answer file scoring score received from the evaluator 121 in the answer / results database 113. Here, the answer file scoring score may be an answer file scoring score of a plurality of test takers for a specific problem, or may be an answer file scoring score for each particular test taker.

In addition, the database extractor 511 extracts a list of answers for each evaluation member and a question from the question database 109 and the answer / results database 113 coupled with the evaluation server 101.

6 is a diagram illustrating a screen of a general question type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 6, in the general question type screen, the problem providing screen 601 includes a problem video part 603 and an answer file part 605.

The problem video portion 603 is a portion where a problem transmitted from the evaluation server 101 is reproduced as an image and sound by the image output unit 303 and the audio output unit 311 provided in the test taker apparatus 301.

The answer file part 605 is a part in which the answer file answered by the test taker 123 is viewed as a video or a voice. In this case, the answer file is an image and a voice answered by the test taker 123 are processed by the image input unit 313, the voice input unit 309, and the data processing unit 305 provided in the test taker device 301. .

7 is an exemplary view of a screen of an image (still image) problem type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 7, the problem providing screen 601 of the screen of the image (still picture) problem type is composed of a problem moving picture part 603, an answer file part 605, and an image part 701.

The examinee 123 sees and hears the problem of the problem video portion 603 for the image shown in the image portion 701 and answers as shown in FIG. 6. Then, the answer of the candidate 123 is generated as an answer file in the form of a video and a voice file, and played in the answer file part 605.

8 is a diagram illustrating a screen of a text problem type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 8, the problem providing screen 601 of the text problem type screen is composed of a problem video part 603, an answer file part 605, and a text part 801.

The examinee 123 sees and hears the problem of the problem video portion 603 for the word, sentence, etc. shown in the character portion 801, and answers as shown in FIG. Then, the answer of the candidate 123 is generated as an answer file in the form of a video and a voice file, and played in the answer file part 605.

9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a moving picture problem type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 9, the problem providing screen 601 of the moving picture problem type screen is composed of a problem moving picture part 603, an answer file part 605, and a moving picture part 901.

The examinee 123 sees and hears the problem of the problem moving picture portion 603 for the moving picture shown in the moving picture portion 901, and answers as shown in FIG. 6. Then, the answer of the candidate 123 is generated as an answer file in the form of a video and a voice file, and played in the answer file part 605.

10 is a diagram showing the configuration of a screen for registering as a member of the speech ability evaluation server of the answer batch batch scoring method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 10, the member registration screen 1001 of the speech ability evaluation system is composed of basic information 1003, learning object information 1005, member registration button 1007, and the like.

The basic information 1003 includes a member ID input part 1009, a duplicate ID check button 1011, a password input part 1013, a password confirmation input part 1015, a name input part 1017, and a job selection part ( 1019), telephone number input portion 1021, address input portion 1023, and the like.

The member ID input part 1009 is an ID that the candidate 123 intends to use, and the member ID is an identifier that is distinguished from member information of other members registered in the evaluation server 101.

When the duplicate ID check button 1011 is clicked, the ID input in the member ID input part 1009 confirms whether the ID is duplicated with existing IDs of members of the evaluation server 101, and a result of checking whether the ID is duplicated is displayed on the screen. Here, if there is a duplicate ID, the candidate 123 must register as a member using another ID.

The password input part 1013 is a part for inputting a password to be used for logging in to the evaluation server after registering with the ID entered in the member ID input part 1009.

The password confirmation input part 1015 is a part for inputting the password once more to confirm whether the password entered in the password input part 1013 is correctly entered.

The name input portion 1017 is a portion for inputting the name of the candidate 123.

The job selection part 1019 is a part for selecting a job of the candidate 123.

The telephone number input portion 1021 is a portion for inputting the telephone number of the candidate 123.

The address input portion 1023 is a portion for inputting the address of the candidate 123.

The learning target information 1005 includes a learning subject setting part 1025, a learning level selecting part 1027, and the like.

The learning subject setting part 1025 is a part in which the test taker 123 checks a subject to be tested for speaking ability through the evaluation server. Here, the learning subject may be Korean, English, Chinese, Japanese, German, French, and the like.

If your subject is Korean, you can assess your ability to speak fluently in response to specific situations or questions. In this case, the respondents can present the results of the speaking analysis and corrections by watching the video.

For example, suppose you set up a situation where you describe yourself and describe the advantages and disadvantages of your interview. The evaluation server presents the candidate with a speaking problem about the situation and receives the answer file in the form of a voice or video spoken by the candidate in Korean. The answer file is stored in the database and then evaluated by the evaluator. When the evaluator evaluates the corrected content of the answer file, the candidate can view the results of his / her Korean speaking evaluation.

The learning level selection part 1027 is a part for selecting the learning level of each learning subject checked by the candidate 123. Here, the learning level may be basic, beginner, intermediate, advanced, and the like.

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a screen for setting an evaluation service problem type and requesting a problem according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG.

Referring to FIG. 11, a problem type setting screen 1101 is composed of an item setting part 1103 for each problem type, a total time required 1105, a save and test button 1107, and the like.

The item setting part 1103 for each question type includes a question type 1109, a difficulty 1111, a number of questions 1113, and the like.

Here, the problem type 1109 includes a problem type such as a yes / no form, an optional form, an image description form, a sentence reading form, or a video description form. Difficulty 1111 can set the difficulty level of the type of problem to be tested among basic, beginner, intermediate, and advanced.

When the test taker 123 sets the difficulty and the number of questions for each question type in the question setting part 1103 for each question type, the time required for the speaking ability test as the set problem appears in the total time required 1105.

When the test taker 123 clicks the save and test button 1107, the requested type, difficulty, and item-specific problem may be sequentially transmitted to the test taker device 301 to test the speaking ability through the network 115. . The question for each item is provided to the problem providing screen 601 of FIGS. 6 to 9 according to a problem type.

12 is a diagram showing the configuration of a screen for setting the evaluation committee member for each problem of the speaking ability test according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 12, the evaluation committee setting screen 1201 includes a test conduct day 1203, a total test staff 1205, a problem setting committee setting part 1207, a storage button 1209, and the like.

The total number of test takers 1205 represents the total number of test takers 123 who took the speaking ability test on the test conduct day 1203.

The questionnaire-based evaluation member setting part 1207 shows a list of all questions tested by the total test taker 1205 on the test date 1203.

For each question in the question list, a question type, a listen question button 1211, an answer writer, and an evaluator selection part 1213 are provided.

When the question listening button 1211 is clicked, a video, an audio, and the like of a corresponding problem are transmitted to the evaluator 121 and reproduced by the evaluator device. Here, the apparatus of the evaluation commissioner should be provided with an image output unit, and an audio output unit such as a speaker.

When the save button 1209 is clicked on, the evaluation member information selected for each question is transmitted to the evaluation server 101 and stored in the problem database 109.

When the evaluator 121 accesses the evaluation server 101 and requests a batch evaluation of the answers, a plurality of answer files for a problem corresponding to the evaluator 121 are extracted for each problem and transmitted to the evaluator 121. do.

For example, suppose that questions 1 and 3 in FIG. 12 are stored as a problem to be evaluated by the evaluator 121 of Park Sung-soo. When the Park Sung-soo evaluation member 121 accesses the evaluation server 101 and requests an answer evaluation, the answer files corresponding to questions 1 and 3 corresponding to the evaluation member 121 are extracted. In this case, the grading of each answer is scored in the next answer after the grading of the entire answer for one question. That is, after seeing and hearing 301 answer files of the test taker 123 for the first question, all of them are scored, and then seeing and hearing 213 answer files of the test taker 123 for the third question.

13 is a view showing the configuration of the speech ability answer batch scoring list screen for the evaluation member according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 13, the answer batch scoring list screen 1301 is composed of a test conduct day 1203, an evaluation committee member 1303, and an answer list part 1305 for each question.

The question-specific answer list portion 1305 is composed of a question number, a question type, a question listening button 1307, an answer author, a scoring button 1309, and the like.

When the question listening button 1307 is clicked, a video, a sound, and the like of a corresponding problem are transmitted to the evaluator 121 and reproduced by the evaluator device.

When the scoring button 1309 is clicked on, the answer evaluation request for the question is sent to the evaluation server 101, and the batch answer scoring screen 1401 shown in FIG. 14 is transmitted to the device of the evaluator 101 to batch answer. Evaluate.

14 is a diagram showing the configuration of the speech ability answer batch scoring screen for the evaluation member according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 14, the collective answer scoring screen 1401 includes a test conduct day 1201, evaluator information 1303, question content 1403, answer video part 1409, test taker information part 1411, and answer answer. A button 1413, a next button 1415, a score input portion 1417, a score storage button 1418, and the like.

The problem content 1403 displays a problem number, a problem type, a problem listening button 1405, an answer writer, and the like.

When the question listening button 1405 is clicked, a video, a sound, and the like of a corresponding problem are transmitted to the evaluator 121 and reproduced by the evaluator device.

The candidate information portion 1411 displays information such as the member ID and name of the candidate 123.

When the answer answer button 1413 is clicked, the answer video file is played in the answer video portion 1409.

When the next button 1415 is clicked on, the answer file of another test taker 123 for the question displayed in the question content 1403 is played in the answer video portion 1409.

After viewing and listening to the answer of the test taker 123 reproduced in the answer video portion 1409, input a score in the score input portion 1417 and click the save score button 1419. The score is then sent to the evaluation server 101 and stored in the answer / grade database 113.

15A is an overall flowchart of a speech ability evaluation service of an answer batch scoring method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 15A, when the candidate 111 makes a problem request (S1501A), the branch server 117 receives the problem request and transmits it to the evaluation server 101 (S1503A). The evaluation server 101 extracts the problem (S1505A) in response to the problem request, and transmits the extracted problem to the branch server 117 (S1507A). The point server 117 transmits the received problem to the device of the candidate 123 (S1509A). When the test taker 123 generates the answer file (S1511A) and transmits the answer file to the branch server 117 (S1513A), the branch server 117 transmits the received answer file to the evaluation server 101 (S1515A). .

When the speaking ability test of the plurality of test takers 123 is completed as described above, the evaluator 121 scores the answers to the questions collectively. In the batch answers, the evaluator 121 requests (not shown) the problem scoring of one of the question lists designated by the evaluator 121 among a plurality of questions of a specific test date. Then, the answer files of all the test takers 123 gazing at the question are extracted from the answer / transcript database 113 combined with the evaluation server 101 (S1517A).

The extracted answer file is transmitted to the apparatus of the evaluator 121 (S1519A) to be reproduced as an image and sound, and the evaluator 121 scores the score for the answer file (S1517A). The score is then sent to the evaluation server (101) (S1523A) and stored in the answer / grade database 113 (S1525A). When the scoring of the answer files of all the test takers 123 is completed as described above, the test taker 123 may inquire (S1527A) the grade result of the speaking ability test through a web browser.

The step S1527A to the step S1527A is a flowchart illustrating the entire process of the embodiment in which the test taker 123 performs the speaking ability test provided by the evaluation server 101 through the branch server 117.

15B is an overall flowchart of a speech ability evaluation service of an answer batch scoring method according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 15B, the candidate 123 first registers a member S1501 in the evaluation server 101 in order to take a speaking test based on the Internet 201.

The test taker 123 takes the test of speaking ability evaluation while the member is logged in (S1503). Then, when the answer request of the candidate 123 transmits the answer file in the form of a video or voice file about the problem transmitted from the evaluation server 101, the evaluation server 101 receives it and answers the answer / results database 113. Save (S1505).

The evaluator 121 for each of the questions provided to the test taker 123 is set (S1507).

When the evaluation committee member 121 scores a plurality of answers for each question (S1509), the scoring scores are stored in the answer / grade database 113 (S1511).

When the scoring of the answer files of all the test takers 123 is completed as described above, the test taker 123 may inquire (S1513) grade results of the speaking ability test through a web browser.

Step S1501 to step S1513 is a flowchart illustrating the entire process of the embodiment in which the test taker 123 directly connects to the evaluation server 101 through the Internet 201 without the branch server 117 and performs the speaking ability test.

FIG. 16 is a flowchart illustrating a process of registering a member in a system for evaluating speaking ability of an answer batch scoring method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 16, when the candidate 123 makes a member registration request to the evaluation server 101, the candidate server 123 transmits an evaluation server member registration screen 1001 corresponding to the member registration request (S1601). The candidate 123 receives member basic information such as a member ID, a name, and the like (S1603), and receives member learning subject information such as a foreign language type and level to be studied (S1605).

The data corresponding to the received member ID is extracted from the member database 111 coupled with the evaluation server 101 (S1607), and it is determined whether there is member data (S1609).

If there is member data as a result of the determination, a duplicate member ID error message is transmitted (S1611).

If there is no member data corresponding to the ID as a result of the determination, the basic member information and the member learning subject information are stored in the member database (S1613).

Operation S1601 to operation S1613 are detailed descriptions of operation S1501 of FIG. 15.

17 is a flowchart illustrating a process of setting an evaluation service problem type according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 17, the evaluation server 101 receives a problem type, a difficulty level, and a number of questions from the test taker 123 (S1701). Then, a problem of speaking ability corresponding to the problem type, difficulty, and number of questions is arbitrarily extracted (S1703) from the problem database 109 coupled with the evaluation server 101. In operation S1705, a time required for speaking ability test of the extracted problem is calculated.

A problem type setting screen 1101 and a problem providing screen 601 are generated using the extracted problem and the required time (S1707).

18 is a flowchart illustrating a process of providing a problem to a speaking ability test candidate through a network according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 18, the evaluation server 101 transmits a speaking ability evaluation problem to the test taker 123 in response to the problem request of the test taker 123 (S1801). The test taker 123 sees and hears the problem, and then speaks an answer to the problem. In this case, the video and audio of the test taker 123 are recorded and recorded by the test taker device 301, and the data is processed into an answer file. . When receiving the problem identifier and the answer file from the test taker device 301 (S1803), the problem identifier and answer file of the test taker 123 are stored in the answer / transcript database 113 (S1805).

When the storage of the answer file is completed as described above, it is determined whether a problem request for the next problem is received from the candidate 123 (S1807).

As a result of the determination, if there is a next problem request, the process of transmitting the speaking ability evaluation problem to the test taker 123 again (S1801) is repeated to store the answer file (S1805). However, if there is no next problem request as a result of the determination, the problem transmission and the answer file storing process are terminated.

Operation S1807 to operation S1807 are detailed descriptions of operation S1505 of FIG. 15.

19 is a flowchart illustrating a process of setting an answer committee for question-specific questions according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 19, a test implementation date, a problem identifier, and an evaluation committee member set by the manager 119 are received (S1901). The test date, the question identifier, and the evaluator identifier are stored as the evaluator information in the question database 109 (1903).

Operation S1901 to operation S1903 are detailed descriptions of operation S1507 of FIG. 15.

20 is a flowchart illustrating a process of collectively scoring a speech ability answer by an evaluator according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 20, the evaluation server 101 receives a request for an answer list for a test implementation date from an evaluation member 123 (S2001). Then, the question corresponding to the test date and the evaluator 121 is extracted from the question database 109, and the answer file for each question is extracted from the answer / results database 113 (S2003).

In step S2005, it is determined whether a request for scoring a specific question is received from the list of answers for each question.

If it is determined that the answer scoring request is not received, the process is terminated. If the answer scoring request is received, the answer file corresponding to the specific question is transmitted to the evaluator 121 (S2007). Here, the answer file is reproduced as an image and sound by the apparatus of the evaluator 121.

When the evaluation member 121 receives the score scored for the answer file (S2009), the score is stored in the answer / results database 113 as the grade of the test taker 123 corresponding to the answer file (S2011). )do.

After storing the score given for one answer file, it is determined whether an answer scoring request for the next answer file is received from the evaluator 121 (S2005).

As a result of the determination, if there is a next answer scoring request, step S2007 is repeated from step S2011. However, if there is no grading request for the next answer as a result of the determination, the batch scoring process for each question is terminated.

The steps S2001 to S2011 are detailed descriptions of steps S1509 and S1511 of FIG. 15.

21 is a block diagram of a system for evaluating speaking ability of the answer batch scoring method according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 21, the test taker device 301 may test a speaking ability according to a problem request with the client problem providing module 2103. When the test ends, a plurality of answer files for all questions It is transmitted from the candidate's device 301 to the evaluation server 101 and stored. Other components are the same as those described in FIG.

FIG. 22 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a problem providing module for a client according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG.

Referring to FIG. 22, the problem providing module 2103 for a client included in the test taker device 301 receives a problem request of the test taker 123 and extracts a corresponding problem and provides the same to the test taker device 301.

The client problem providing module 2103 includes a transmitter 2201, a receiver 2203, an interface unit 2205, a determination unit 2207, an answer storage 2209, and a problem extraction unit 2211.

The transmitter 2201 transmits the speaking ability problem extracted from the problem extractor 2211 to the test taker 123.

The receiver 2203 receives the information transmitted from the test taker 123 and transmits the information to the determination unit 2207.

The interface unit 2205 generates a speaking ability problem screen including the speaking ability problem and the time taken from the problem extracting unit 2211.

The determination unit 2207 determines an error or the like of the data input by the test taker 123.

In addition, the determination unit 2207 transfers the speech ability problem data extracted from the problem extraction unit 2211 to the interface unit 2205 and the transmission unit 2201.

The answer storage 2209 stores information for constructing a speech ability problem screen to be generated by the interface unit 2205.

The problem extracting unit 2211 extracts a speaking ability problem corresponding to the learning object information, the problem type, the problem level, and the number of questions set by the candidate 123 from the client problem database 2213.

23 is an overall flowchart of a speech ability evaluation service of the answer batch batch scoring method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 23, the test taker 123 includes a problem providing module for a client in a computer device (S2301). The candidate 123 first registers a member (S2303) on the evaluation server 101 in order to take the speaking ability test based on the network 115.

The test taker 123 performs the test of speaking ability evaluation (S2304) while the member is logged in. The problem providing module 2103 for the client extracts a problem corresponding to the problem request by the problem request of the candidate 123. When the problem is reproduced in the form of an image or a sound by the candidate's device 301, the candidate 123 speaks an answer to the problem. The answer is generated by the candidate device 301 as an answer file in the form of a video or audio file and transmitted to the evaluation server 101. When the evaluation server 101 receives the answer file, the evaluation server 101 receives it and stores it in the answer / results database 1103 (S2305).

The evaluator 121 for each of the questions provided to the test taker 123 is set (S2307).

When the evaluator 121 grades a plurality of answers for each question (S2309), the grading score is stored in the answer / grade database (S2311).

When the scoring of the answer files of all the test takers 123 is completed as described above, the test taker 123 may inquire (S2313) grade results of the speaking ability test through a web browser.

24 is a flowchart illustrating a process of providing a problem to the speaking ability test test taker 123 by the problem providing module for a client according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 24, a problem request including a problem type, a difficulty level, and a number of problems is received from the candidate 123 (S2401). Then, the client problem providing module 2103 included in the test taker device 301 arbitrarily extracts a speaking ability problem corresponding to the problem request from the client problem database 2213 in the module (S2403).

Speaking ability test time required for the extracted problem is calculated (S2405). Then, a problem providing screen including the extracted problem and the required time is generated (S2407) and reproduced by the candidate apparatus 301 (S2409). In response to the question, the answer video file generated by the candidate's device 301 is stored in the answer storage 2209 in the question providing module 2103 for the client (S2411). It is determined whether there is a next problem to be provided to the candidate 123 (S2413).

If there is a next problem as a result of the determination, steps S2409 to S2411 are repeated. However, if there is no next problem as a result of the determination, all the answer files, the problem identifier, and the candidate 123 identifier stored in the answer storage 2209 are transmitted to the evaluation server 101 through the above-described process (S2415). All of the answer file, the question identifier, and the candidate 123 identifier are transmitted to the evaluation server 101 and then stored (not shown) in the answer / transcript database 113.

25 is an exemplary view of a speaking ability evaluation screen according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 25, the speaking proficiency evaluation screen 2501 includes a test conduct date, a region, a reception number, an answer file portion, and a score scoring portion for each item.

That is, the evaluator views and listens to the answer file prepared by the candidate, and assigns the score to each item in the scoring section for each item and stores it. Then, the points assigned to each item are processed to add up the total points, and the total points are stored in the database as test taker's speaking ability evaluation scores.

26 and 27 are exemplary diagrams of a candidate acceptance screen registered by a receptionist according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIGS. 26 and 27, when a candidate visits an authorized center and takes a speaking test, the receptionist of the center registers the candidate's examination information in the evaluation server.

The receptionist can take a candidate's reception screen (2601, 2701) such as name, social security number, gender, telephone number, mobile phone number, zip code, address, reception area, examination area, level, reception date, examination date, seat number Contains information.

After inputting the test information and clicking the create button, the set test information is transmitted to the evaluation server and stored in the member database.

When the test is completed in the speaking ability test by the receptionist of the authorized center as described above, a screen of the speaking ability problem corresponding to the test information is generated from the evaluation server and transmitted to the candidate device.

28 is a view showing the adult basic questions according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 28, the basic adult question 2801 is a list of basic types of problem types provided to candidates corresponding to adults.

The basic adult question 2801 includes information such as a question type, a question, a time required for each problem, a total time required, and a remark.

For example, two questions of a question type answering a Yes / No form as an adult basic question 2801 are provided, and the time required for each problem is 10 seconds, and the total time may be 20 seconds.

29 is a view showing the basic questions for elementary school according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 29, the basic question 2901 for elementary school is a list of basic types of problem types provided to candidates corresponding to adolescents, elementary, middle, and high school students.

Elementary elementary question 2901 includes information such as problem type, item, time spent by problem, total time spent, and remarks.

For example, elementary basic question 2901 is provided with three questions of a question type that answer in a Yes / No form, each of which takes 7 seconds, and a total of 21 seconds.

The present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and many variations are possible by those skilled in the art within the spirit of the present invention.

As described above, according to the present invention, a video- and answer-type answer file in which the candidate responds is transmitted to and stored in the evaluation server, and then the evaluator collectively scores a plurality of answers to one question. It is possible to provide a method for evaluating speaking ability of a device and a system corresponding to the method.

In addition, according to the present invention by storing the answers of the plurality of respondents in the answer file, such as video, voice, and the like to continue to see and hear a plurality of answers to a single question for scoring and the time required to score the answers of multiple candidates It is possible to provide a method for evaluating speaking ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method that reduces costs and labor, and an apparatus and system corresponding to the method.

In addition, according to the present invention, an answer file is generated through a candidate device having an image input means and a voice input means instead of the interview format, and is transmitted to an evaluation server for scoring the answer file and stored in a database. It is possible to provide a method for evaluating speaking ability of a method, an apparatus and a system corresponding to the method.

According to the present invention, a method for evaluating speaking ability of a network-based answer batch scoring method capable of collectively scoring stored answers after checking and testing a candidate through a network without time and place restrictions, an apparatus corresponding to the method, and A system can be provided.

Claims (36)

In the method for the evaluation server to provide the assessment of the speech ability of the answer batch scoring method over the network, Receiving a question-specific answer list request from the evaluator; Extracting at least one answer list corresponding to the evaluator, wherein the answer list includes at least one candidate answer file; And Transmitting the extracted answer list to the evaluator; Including but not limited to: The answer file is received by the evaluator and reproduced in at least one form of a video and audio is evaluated by the evaluator Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 1, Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method Receiving a score for evaluating the answer file by the evaluator; And Storing the received evaluation score in an answer / transcript database coupled to the evaluation server Containing more Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 2, The received score is Stored in an answer / transcript database coupled to the test taker corresponding to the answer file; Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 1, Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method Extracting at least one problem corresponding to the evaluator Include more, The extracted answer list corresponds to the extracted problem Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 4, wherein The question-specific answer list request includes the date of the exam. The extracted problem corresponds to the test date. Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 1, The extracted answer list is It is included in speech ability evaluation screen and sent to the evaluation committee member Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 1, Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method Receiving a problem request from at least one candidate comprising at least one of a problem type, a problem level, and a question number; Extracting a problem corresponding to at least one of the problem type and the problem level from the problem database associated with the evaluation server corresponding to the problem request according to the number of questions; Generating a speaking ability problem screen including the extracted problem and transmitting the same to the at least one candidate; Receiving an answer file from the at least one candidate; And Storing the answer file in an answer / transcript database associated with the assessment server Containing more Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 7, wherein The problem is Randomly extracted Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 7, wherein The answer file received is In the form of at least one of video recording and audio recording Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 9, The answer file is Receiving from a candidate device corresponding to the candidate Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 10, The candidate device Voice output means for reproducing a voice corresponding to the problem; Voice input means for recording the candidate's voice; And Data processing means for processing the voice received through the voice input means to generate the answer file Having Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 10, The candidate device Image output means for reproducing a moving picture corresponding to the extracted problem; Image input means for recording the expression and behavior of the candidate; And Data processing means for generating the answer file by processing the video received through the image input means; Having Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 7, wherein The type of problem extracted above Containing at least one of a general question type, an image problem type, a character problem type, and a video problem type Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 7, wherein The type of problem extracted above Preset by the candidate Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 7, wherein The problem type above Set in real time by the candidate Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 1, The candidate is Being registered in advance in the evaluation server Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 4, wherein The evaluation committee member Preset according to the extracted problem Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. The method of claim 1, The evaluation server At least one branch server is interworked with the network, The at least one branch server Receiving a problem request from at least one candidate comprising at least one of a problem type, a problem level, and a question number; Sending the problem request to the evaluation server; Receiving a speech ability problem screen including a problem corresponding to the problem request from the evaluation server; Transmitting the speech ability problem screen to the at least one candidate; Receiving an answer file recorded and recorded from the candidate; Transmitting the answer file to the evaluation server To do Speaking ability evaluation method of answer batch scoring method characterized in that. In the problem providing module for a client provided in the test taker device connected to the evaluation server and a network, the method for providing the speech ability evaluation of the answer batch scoring method, Receiving a problem request from the candidate; Extracting a problem corresponding to the problem request from a client problem database linked to the client problem providing module; Playing the extracted problem in at least one of a moving picture and a voice on the test taker device; Receiving an answer file recorded and recorded in response to the question from the candidate; And Transmitting the answer file to the evaluation server Including but not limited to: The evaluation server Send a list of answers containing at least the answer file to the evaluator corresponding to the extracted question, The answer file is received by the evaluator and reproduced in the form of a video, voice is evaluated by the evaluator Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, The problem request above Containing at least one of question type, question level, and number of questions Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 20, The problem is Corresponding to at least one of the question type and problem level, and extracting the number of questions Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client Generating a speech ability problem screen including the extracted problem; And Playing the generated speech ability problem screen in at least one of a moving picture and a voice on the test taker device; Containing more Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client Storing the received answer file in an answer storage linked to the problem providing module for the client Containing more Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, The evaluation server Receiving a score at which the evaluator evaluated the answer file, and storing the received score in an answer / transcript database coupled to the evaluation server Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 24, The evaluation score is Stored in an answer / transcript database coupled to the candidate and coupled to the assessment server Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, The answer file is It is included in speech ability evaluation screen and sent to the evaluation committee member Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, The candidate device Voice output means for reproducing a voice corresponding to the problem; Voice input means for recording the candidate's voice; And Data processing means for processing the voice received through the voice input means to generate the answer file Having Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, The candidate device Image output means for reproducing a moving picture corresponding to the extracted problem; Image input means for recording the expression and behavior of the candidate; And Data processing means for generating the answer file by processing the video received through the image input means; Further equipped Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 21, The type of problem extracted above Containing at least one of a general question type, an image problem type, a character problem type, and a video problem type Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 21, The type of problem extracted above Preset by the candidate Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 21, The problem type above Set in real time by the candidate Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. The method of claim 19, The evaluation committee member Preset according to the extracted problem Speaking ability evaluation method of the answers batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. In the evaluation apparatus for providing a speech assessment of the answer batch scoring method through a network, Means for receiving a question-specific answer list request from an evaluator; Means for extracting at least one answer list corresponding to the evaluator, wherein the answer list includes at least one candidate answer file; And Means for transmitting the extracted answer list to the evaluator; Including but not limited to: The answer file is received by the evaluator and reproduced in at least one form of a video and audio is evaluated by the evaluator Speaking ability evaluation device of the answer batch scoring method characterized in that. In the test taker device connected to the evaluation server and the network and provided with a problem providing module for the client to provide a speech assessment evaluation of the answers batch scoring method, Means for receiving a problem request from the candidate; Means for extracting a problem corresponding to the problem request from a client problem database linked to the client problem providing module; Means for reproducing the extracted problem in at least one of a moving picture and a voice on the candidate device; Means for receiving an answer file recorded and recorded in response to the problem from the candidate; And Means for sending the answer file to the evaluation server Including, The evaluation server Send a list of answers containing at least the answer file to the evaluator corresponding to the extracted question, The answer file is received by the evaluator and reproduced in the form of a video, voice is evaluated by the evaluator Candidate device for evaluating speaking ability of the answer batch scoring method in the client, characterized in that. In the evaluation server for providing a speech assessment of the answer batch scoring method over the network, A memory storing a program; And A processor coupled with the memory to execute the program Including but not limited to: The processor by the program, Receiving a question-specific answer list request from the evaluator, Extracting at least one answer list corresponding to the evaluator, wherein the answer list includes at least one candidate answer file; and Transmitting the extracted answer list to the evaluator Including but not limited to: The answer file is received by the evaluator and reproduced in at least one form of a video and audio is evaluated by the evaluator Speaking ability evaluation server of the answer batch scoring method characterized in that. A program of instructions that can be executed by the digital processing device to perform a method for providing an answer batch evaluation method of speaking ability evaluation in a problem providing module for a client device connected to an evaluation server and a network is tangible. A recording medium embodied and readable by a digital processing apparatus, Speaking ability evaluation method of the answer batch scoring method in the client, Receiving a problem request from the candidate; Extracting a problem corresponding to the problem request from a client problem database linked to the client problem providing module; Playing the extracted problem in at least one of a moving picture and a voice on the test taker device; Receiving an answer file recorded and recorded in response to the question from the candidate; And Transmitting the answer file to the evaluation server Including but not limited to: The evaluation server Send a list of answers containing at least the answer file to the evaluator corresponding to the extracted question, The answer file is received by the evaluator and reproduced in the form of a video, voice is evaluated by the evaluator And a recording medium.