KR102433303B1 - Method, apparatus and program for drawing test using digital devices - Google Patents

Abstract

A picture inspection method using a digital device is provided. The picture inspection method using the digital device is a method performed by a computer, comprising the steps of providing a user interface including a picture area for picture inspection and a digital picture tool, and inputting the picture area into the picture area using the digital picture tool and obtaining a user input to be used, performing picture inspection evaluation on the user input, and outputting the picture inspection evaluation result.

Description

Picture inspection method, device and program using digital device {METHOD, APPARATUS AND PROGRAM FOR DRAWING TEST USING DIGITAL DEVICES}

The present invention relates to a picture inspection method, apparatus and program using a digital device.

Drawing examination is to identify an individual's psychological characteristics and symptoms through paper and pencil or simple coloring tools, and there is art therapy to establish a psychological treatment plan through this.

Drawing is a basic human language, and when drawing, people tend to reveal what they are thinking of themselves or who they want to be. This is what psychological treatment is all about.

Recently, the use and dissemination of tablet notes has rapidly increased, researches related to digital culture and art therapy are increasing, and the use of digital technology in the field of art therapy is showing an upward trend.

Korean Patent Registration No. 10-0749032 (2007.08.07)

The problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a more objective picture inspection method by using a digital device.

In addition, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a test for game over-immersion through a picture test using a digital device.

The problems to be solved by the present invention are not limited to the problems mentioned above, and other problems not mentioned will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description.

A picture inspection method using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention for solving the above problems is a method performed by a computer, comprising: providing a user interface including a picture area and a digital picture tool for picture inspection Step, obtaining a user input input to the picture area by using the digital picture tool, performing picture inspection evaluation on the user input, and outputting the picture inspection evaluation result.

In the picture inspection method using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention for solving the above problems, the step of providing the user interface or outputting the picture inspection evaluation result is performed at predetermined intervals or when a specific event occurs. It further comprises the step of repeatedly executing and outputting a comparison result comparing each picture inspection evaluation result output by the repeated execution.

The picture inspection evaluation is the order in which pictures are drawn in the picture area input from the digital drawing tool, the type of each subject, the shape of each subject, the position of each subject, the pen pressure, the time it takes to draw the picture, the picture This evaluation is based on at least one of the drawing speed, whether the picture has been modified, and the change between the old picture and the new picture when the picture is modified.

A picture inspection method using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problems includes the steps of providing a user with a questionnaire to obtain a user answer to the questionnaire, the evaluation result of the picture inspection, and the questionnaire Further comprising the step of providing a final psychological test evaluation result based on the user's answer to the test, the step of obtaining the user answer to the questionnaire, the action of acquiring a voice or image through the user interface and recording A user answer is obtained by at least one of the input units, and the user interface is provided to obtain an answer to the questionnaire examination.

In the case of examining the game over-immersion, the picture test evaluation is performed by a Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT), and is based on the person, tree, and color of the picture drawn in the picture area in advance. It is evaluated according to a predetermined evaluation standard, and the predetermined evaluation standard includes the problem-solving ability evaluation criterion as essential, and the degree of coloring, appropriateness of color, inner energy, integration, logic, realism, developmental stage, object and surrounding environment It includes evaluation of at least one of detail description, line quality, person, slope, and perseverance, and the problem-solving ability evaluation criterion is at least one of the order of drawing, the time taken to draw the picture, and whether there is a deviation during the examination. Based on one, we evaluate the solution presented to obtain apples from apple trees in the picture area.

The above problem-solving ability evaluation criteria is the solution in the picture area shown in each picture area of the high-risk group, the boundary group, the general user group, and the game-use group divided through the Comprehensive Scale for Assessing Game Behavior (CSG), a comprehensive diagnostic scale for game behavior. It is based on the problem-solving ability evaluation learning model derived by learning with

The game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale CSG is to classify the user into one of a high-risk group, a boundary group, a general user group, and a game good use group based on the criteria prepared by the game behavior evaluation learning model, and the game behavior evaluation learning model is, It is derived by learning the user answer regarding the diagnostic scale questionnaire and the user's game use data as learning data, and the user answer is obtained by the user interface provided to obtain an answer to the questionnaire examination, and the game use The data includes at least one of a user's game usage and a user's game usage pattern acquired in the computer.

In the case of examining the degree of game over-immersion, when the specific event occurs, the game app in the computer is used or a predetermined game use standard is exceeded.

A picture inspection apparatus using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention for solving the above problems includes a memory for storing one or more instructions and a processor for executing the one or more instructions stored in the memory, the processor comprising: By executing the one or more instructions, the method described above is performed.

The picture inspection computer program using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention for solving the above problems is combined with a computer as hardware, and is stored in a computer-readable recording medium to perform the above-described method.

Other specific details of the invention are included in the detailed description and drawings.

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a more objective picture inspection result by acquiring various picture inspection evaluation factors that can be recognized by a digital device.

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a picture test comparison result according to the passage of time or a specific game usage pattern by providing repeated picture testing through a digital device.

According to the present invention, it is possible to test the game over-immersion through the PPAT test using a digital device.

According to the present invention, based on the user's computer usage pattern obtained in the user's computer, there is an effect that can increase the accuracy of the picture inspection.

Effects of the present invention are not limited to the effects mentioned above, and other effects not mentioned will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description.

1 is a flowchart of a picture inspection method using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 and 3 are diagrams for explaining the interface on the digital device and the digital device for performing the picture inspection method of the present invention.
4 is a flowchart of a method of deriving a comparison result by repeatedly executing a picture inspection.
5 is a flowchart of a method of deriving a final psychological test evaluation result based on a questionnaire test result and a picture test result.
6 shows a picture drawn by a user corresponding to a general user group using a digital device and a picture drawn on paper.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a picture drawn by a user corresponding to the hyper-immersion group (boundary group) using a digital device and a picture drawn on paper.
FIG. 8 shows drawings drawn by a user who is in the hyper-immersion group (high-risk group) using a digital device and a picture drawn on paper.
9 is a block diagram of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Advantages and features of the present invention and methods of achieving them will become apparent with reference to the embodiments described below in detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below, but may be implemented in various different forms, and only these embodiments allow the disclosure of the present invention to be complete, and those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains. It is provided to fully inform those skilled in the art of the scope of the present invention, and the present invention is only defined by the scope of the claims.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing the embodiments and is not intended to limit the present invention. In this specification, the singular also includes the plural, unless specifically stated otherwise in the phrase. As used herein, “comprises” and/or “comprising” does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other components in addition to the stated components. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout, and "and/or" includes each and every combination of one or more of the recited elements. Although "first", "second", etc. are used to describe various elements, these elements are not limited by these terms, of course. These terms are only used to distinguish one component from another. Therefore, it goes without saying that the first component mentioned below may be the second component within the spirit of the present invention.

Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein will have the meaning commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. In addition, terms defined in a commonly used dictionary are not to be interpreted ideally or excessively unless clearly specifically defined.

In this specification, a computer means all types of hardware devices including at least one processor, and may be understood as encompassing software configurations operating in the corresponding hardware device according to embodiments. For example, a computer may be understood to include, but is not limited to, smart phones, tablet PCs, desktops, notebooks, and user clients and applications running on each device.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Each step described in this specification is described as being performed by a computer, but the subject of each step is not limited thereto, and at least a portion of each step may be performed in different devices according to embodiments.

1 is a flowchart of a picture inspection method using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1 , a picture inspection method using a digital device according to an embodiment of the present invention includes providing a user interface (S110), obtaining a user input input to a picture area (S130), and a user input It includes a step of performing a picture inspection evaluation for (S150), and a step of outputting a picture inspection evaluation result (S170).

In the step of providing the user interface ( S110 ), the user interface includes a picture area for picture inspection and a digital picture tool. A user interface provided for picture inspection will be described later in detail with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3 .

The step of obtaining the user input input to the picture area ( S130 ) is to obtain the user input input to the picture area using a digital drawing tool.

The picture that will obtain input from the user for picture examination is a picture instructing the person who performs the examination, such as a therapist or guardian, to draw a specific picture for the user who will perform the picture examination, or a picture that the computer draws on the app. Include the specific picture you request. Here, a specific picture may vary depending on the type of art psychological test.

The types of art psychological tests are DAP (Draw a Person test), House Tree Person test (HTP), and Kinetic House Tree Person test (KHTP). ), Chromatic or Color Drawing test, Draw a Person in the Rain test, Drawing of Animals test, Draw a Family (DAF), Motility Kinetic Family Drawing (KFD), Family Centered Circle Drawing (FCcd), Draw a Group (DAG), Akinetic School Drawing (ASD), Kinetic School Drawing Test (Kinetic School Drawing, KSD), Landscape Montage Technique (LMT), Tree Drawing Test, PPAT, a Person Picking an Apple from a Tree, etc. may be included, and in the above examples All art psychological tests may be included without limitation.

The step (S150) of performing picture test evaluation for user input is when a picture requested according to a specific psychological test is drawn by the user input, the picture is inspected according to the evaluation criteria and scoring method of the specific psychological test for the picture to perform an evaluation.

At this time, the picture inspection evaluation performed by the computer is the order in which pictures are drawn in the picture area input from the digital drawing tool, the type of each subject, the shape of each subject, the position of each subject, the pen pressure, and the time required to draw the picture. This includes evaluating based on at least one of the time taken, the speed at which the picture is drawn, whether the picture has been modified, and the change in the old picture and the new picture when the picture is modified.

When a person directly evaluates a picture drawn by a user on drawing paper, etc., only the evaluation of the resulting picture or the simple process of drawing a picture is possible, but the computer precisely grasps various elements input from the digital drawing tool Therefore, there is a higher effect on the accuracy and reliability of the psychological identification through the picture test.

The various elements input from the digital drawing tool are, as described above, the order of drawing, pen pressure, time required to draw a picture, drawing speed, and correction Changes in the old picture and the new picture may be included when correcting whether or not a picture is made, as well as the type of each subject, the shape of each subject, and the location of each subject that can be identified by the picture drawn on the drawing paper.

By using a digital drawing tool, the user's way of expressing pictures can be diversified and the usage of drawing tools can be improved.

The various user's picture expression methods can examine the individual characteristics of the main 'control' in psychotherapy more than in the general picture test, and this has the effect of clearly setting the plan and direction for psychotherapy.

In various embodiments, the thickness of the pen may be adjusted according to the pen pressure, but the thickness may be divided into preset steps. For example, if the pen thickness according to the pen pressure is divided into 128 levels, the degree of freedom of drawing may be increased, but it may be difficult to determine the psychological state according to the thickness. Therefore, by dividing the thickness of the pen into smaller steps (e.g., 8 steps) than can actually be expressed according to the pen pressure, the change in pen pressure according to the change of the psychological state can be more easily grasped by a person or a computer. . In another embodiment, an image that is actually expressed to the user according to the user's input is expressed in several stages (eg, 128 stages) by subdividing the pen pressure, but is expressed in fewer stages (eg, 8 stages) by grouping several stages may be stored separately. Accordingly, the user can freely express his or her psychological state, but the person or computer who examines it can obtain refined data for easy inspection.

In various embodiments, the computer may separately store information about the user's pen pressure change. For example, the user's pen pressure change divided into 128 steps is converted into data in the form of a graph or table, and the information is stored together with the completed picture, but each pen pressure information is linked with the part of the picture corresponding to the corresponding pen pressure information. can be saved Accordingly, when evaluating the completed drawing, the user's pen pressure change information can be provided together, and the examiner responds to the pen pressure by selecting a pen pressure with a special note (eg, too high or too low pen pressure, a sudden change in pen pressure, etc.) You can get information about where the picture is located. According to an embodiment, when the process of drawing a picture by the user is recorded as an image, images before and after a point in time associated with the corresponding pen pressure may be displayed. Accordingly, there is an advantage that more accurate and diverse evaluation is possible by using information collected in the process of drawing a picture, unlike paper-based evaluation, which evaluates only the finished picture.

Furthermore, the computer may acquire information about a time point at which the user continuously draws a picture and a time point at which the user stops drawing a picture during the drawing process. Through this, the computer can determine at what point the user stopped drawing during the drawing process and how long the drawing was stopped. information can be obtained.

In various embodiments, the computer may provide an eraser interface. However, by separately storing the history information on the part modified by the user using the eraser, information on which picture the user drew and then modified as a final result can be obtained. It is also possible to judge the psychological state of the user based on whether or not the picture has been modified and the change due to the modification. It may be necessary to determine whether it is close to In this case, the sincerity of the user can be judged using the time taken to draw the picture before revision, the time taken to erase the picture before revision after drawing the picture before revision, and the time taken to draw the picture after revision as indicators. . The criterion for judgment is not limited, but for example, by comparing the time taken to draw a picture before retouching and the time taken to draw a picture after retouching, it may be evaluated that the picture that took a longer time is closer to the user's true intention. As another example, if the time taken to erase a picture before modification is less than or equal to a preset reference value, the picture after modification is evaluated to be close to the user's true intention, and if it exceeds the preset reference value, the picture before modification may be evaluated to be close to the user's true intention.

According to an embodiment, the evaluation of the user's authenticity is provided as a reference value or a weight for a specific psychological result, and a final conclusion can be derived by comprehensively judging the user's questionnaire result.

In this way, by using the digital drawing tool, the user's drawing process can be monitored and recorded in real time, and this can be converted into a database. Based on this, more precise and various inspections will be possible, and for this purpose, a new evaluation method may be required in addition to the existing evaluation method. To this end, a criterion or a model capable of evaluating the information obtained in the process of the user drawing a picture and the picture result can be comprehensively evaluated may be developed.

The evaluation model is based on the inspection data (e.g., the result of drawing, the pen pressure obtained in the process of drawing by the user, the order of drawing, the time and speed it takes to draw the drawing, whether or not the drawing has been modified and the content of the revision, etc.) It can be learned based on learning data including information about the user's psychological state, and a specific model or algorithm used for learning is not limited.

In addition, when a digital drawing tool is used and a computer uses a picture inspection evaluation, there is an effect of establishing evaluation criteria that enable more objective judgment. For the processing method of the evaluation criteria, refer to the content to be described later.

2 and 3 are diagrams for explaining the interface on the digital device and the digital device for performing the picture inspection method of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2 , the digital device includes a computer 10 including a tablet PC, etc., and includes a picture input tool 20 as shown in FIG. 2 , or instead of the picture input tool 20 . When the user directly utilizes the digital picture tool 12 by using his/her hand, the picture input tool 20 may be omitted.

FIG. 2 shows the user interface on the output screen of the computer 10, and the user interface includes a drawing area 11 and a digital drawing tool 12 in which a picture is drawn by the user.

The digital drawing tool 12 shows pens and erasers of various colors, and what is shown in FIG. 2 is only an example, and the types of pens (eg, pencils, fountain pens, pens, colored pencils, brushes, highlighters, etc.), and the various colors In addition, various functions necessary for drawing, such as a lasso function, a figure drawing function, a text writing function, a copy function, and a drag function, etc. may be included as a drawing tool.

FIG. 3 is a specifically provided digital drawing tool 12 utilization function. A red pen is selected and extended at the bottom of FIG. 3 (a), and the thickness of the red pen is provided on the left side of FIG. 3 (a). What is provided for you to choose from is shown. Although 12 colored pens are shown at the bottom, as described above, more diverse types of colors may be provided. In the current state, a button called 'Hide' is provided in the upper right corner. When the button is pressed, all digital painting tools 12 are hidden and not visible. At this time, the button called 'Hide' can be changed to a 'Show' button. have. When the 'Show' button is pressed, the user interface may be provided to display the digital drawing tool 12 again as shown in FIG. 3A.

Referring to FIG. 3B , when an eraser is selected, it can be seen that a thickness of the eraser can be selected on the left side. The eraser function may be provided by directly touching a part to be erased on the picture area 11 by selecting an eraser and selecting an eraser thickness, or by sliding or dragging in a touch state. In addition, it may be provided so that the entirety can be erased as shown in FIG. 3(c).

As described above in FIGS. 2 and 3, digital devices provide a variety of drawing tools and functions, thereby enriching the expression method rather than drawing directly on drawing paper, thereby providing a picture examination that derives clear and objective picture examination results. let it be

4 is a flowchart of a method of deriving a comparison result by repeatedly executing a picture inspection.

Referring to FIG. 4 , the method of deriving a comparison result by repeatedly executing the picture inspection includes repeatedly executing the step of providing a user interface to outputting the picture inspection evaluation result in the method of FIG. 1 ( S190 ) and The method further includes outputting the comparison result (S210).

The step of repeatedly executing the step of providing the user interface or outputting the picture inspection evaluation result (S190) includes the step of providing the user interface or outputting the picture inspection evaluation result at predetermined intervals or when a specific event occurs. it will run repeatedly.

The predetermined cycle may be variously set, such as weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or yearly. When a specific event occurs, the specific event may vary depending on the type of artistic psychological test, and the specific event is the user's use of a specific type of app in the computer, the usage pattern of the app, including the computer usage pattern, usage cycle, and the portal site. A predetermined specific event may be included according to the search content, the purpose of using the app, and the like. In particular, in the case of examining the degree of game over-immersion, which will be described later, the occurrence of a specific event may include using a game app in a computer or exceeding a predetermined game use standard.

The step of outputting the comparison result ( S210 ) is to output the comparison result by comparing each picture inspection evaluation result output by the repeated execution step ( S190 ).

The comparison method may include providing a comparison result over time, or according to the type of each specific event described above, when each event occurs, when no event occurs, frequency of event occurrence, total event occurrence It may include providing a comparison result according to the number of times, the number of occurrences of the event within a specific period, and the degree of occurrence of the event.

5 is a flowchart of a method of deriving a final psychological test evaluation result based on a questionnaire test result and a picture test result.

Referring to Figure 5, the method of deriving the final psychological test evaluation result is, in the method of Figure 1, the step of obtaining a user answer to the questionnaire (S230) and the step of providing the final psychological test evaluation result (S250) further includes

The step of obtaining a user answer to the questionnaire (S230) is to provide the user with the questionnaire to obtain a user answer to the provided questionnaire. At this time, the method of obtaining the user answer is to obtain by at least one of the user interface and the action input unit for obtaining voice or video through recording, and at this time, the user interface shows the picture area of FIGS. 1 to 3 . Rather than doing it, it is arranged to obtain an answer to the questionnaire examination.

When interpreting the picture test, the examiner should consider both structural and content factors for a clearer psychological diagnosis. Although the picture test gives a lot of implicit information about the user who is the examinee, it is possible to provide a clear psychological diagnosis result for the examiner to identify and diagnose the user as a whole rather than draw the diagnosis result based on only the user's picture.

Therefore, in order to diagnose the psychology by grasping the user as a whole, the patient's personal history and the clinical impression obtained from the interview can be taken into consideration together. It is possible to derive the psychological diagnosis result by comprehensively considering the user's answer and picture examination.

Obtaining a user answer through the user interface means obtaining a user answer directly input by the user through the user interface, and obtaining a user answer through the action input unit obtains the user's voice or image as an answer to the questionnaire will do

Hereinafter, a specific method of using the PPAT test, which has been continuously improved through validation tests, among the various types of art psychological tests described above, as an embodiment of the present invention will be described.

PPAT is a picture evaluation tool that is often used in the art therapy field. Characteristics of PPAT include the use of a familiar subject, the cross-cultural attribute of the apple tree, applicable to various ages, and the ability to check changes over time through repeated measurement, and information related to the user's emotional response through the use of color. can provide In addition, the solution method of picking apples shown in the picture has a characteristic that reveals an individual's problem-solving method.

The picture elements of PPAT are largely composed of figures, trees, colors, and problem solving. For figures, the evaluation is based on body shape, size, omission, detail, distortion, and movement, and for trees, the pillars and branches of trees. , based on the overall harmony of the tree. When evaluating tree drawings, the components such as roots, stems, branches, crowns, and flowers are looked at and evaluated considering pen pressure, location, and shape. At this time, in the case of pen pressure, etc., since the computer can accurately recognize that the user draws using the picture input tool 20 or the hand on the computer such as a tablet PC rather than the picture drawn using the marker on the drawing paper, the computer can accurately recognize the drawing using the computer. The test has the effect of making a more accurate judgment.

In addition, even when considering the selection of colors and the use of colors, various colors can be used when examining pictures through a computer rather than an actual marker, so that the user's psychological state or personality can be grasped in more detail.

In various embodiments, when a user interface for selecting a color is provided, the type of color to be provided may be determined based on a color required or limited by the test according to the type of test. Such information may be newly input according to the type of examination, but in the case of a known examination, the tool interface for the examination may be automatically loaded and set.

In the problem solving section, according to the results of the study to be described later, it can be confirmed that the problem solving methods of users classified according to their psychological state, etc., show a clear difference in the picture entered into the computer than the picture drawn on the drawing paper, which leads to a clearer picture test result. It has been proven that using a computer is effective for this purpose.

On the other hand, in a study of art therapy methods using digital images for children addicted to Internet games, it was confirmed that digital image art therapy was effective in lowering the degree of Internet addiction.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a more effective digital psychological test for game over-immersion users as an embodiment. In addition, it provides a method of using the PPAT picture test that can derive clear psychological test results for game over-immersion users.

In one embodiment, in the case of examining the game over-immersion, the picture test evaluation performed in the present invention is performed by the PPAT, and a predetermined evaluation based on the person, tree, and color of the picture drawn in the picture area It is evaluated by standards. Here, the predetermined evaluation criteria include problem-solving ability evaluation criteria as essential, and the degree of coloring, appropriateness of color, inner energy, integration, logic, realism, developmental stage, detailed description of object and surrounding environment, quality of line, person, slope , including those relating to the evaluation of at least one of perseverance properties. In addition, the problem-solving ability evaluation criterion is to evaluate the solution that appeared to obtain an apple from an apple tree in the drawing area based on at least one of the order of drawing, the time spent drawing, and whether or not there was any deviation during the examination.

As described above, the PPAT test evaluates people, trees, colors, and problem solving based on the criteria for problem solving. In particular, problem solving is based on not only the solution revealed to obtain an apple from the apple tree in the picture area, but also the picture until the solution is derived. It can be evaluated based on at least one of the time taken to draw a picture that can understand the drawing order, time to worry, etc., and whether there is a deviation during the test that can determine the concentration of the test.

At this time, the order of drawing, the time taken to draw, and whether there is any deviation during the examination can be more accurately identified through the digital drawing tool being input into the computer, and the computer will use the evaluation criteria considering all relevant factors. It is possible to derive the picture inspection evaluation result.

Game over-immersion can generally be diagnosed through the Comprehensive Scale for Assessing Game Behavior (CSG), not the PPAT as in the present invention. The game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale CSG is classified into four groups through a two-step scoring and diagnosis process consisting of the game play diagnostic scale (AGUS) and the problematic game use diagnostic scale (MGUS).

Game use is measured by seven sub-factors: 'vigorous experience', 'extension of life experience', 'leisure good use', 'immersion experience', 'pride experience', 'control experience', and 'maintenance and expansion of social support network', Problematic game use was classified into 7 sub-factors of 'tolerance', 'withdrawal', 'excessive time consumption', 'control impairment', 'compulsive use', 'ignorance of daily life', and 'continuous use despite side effects'. It is measured. According to the diagnostic results of the above-mentioned diagnostic scale for game use and problematic game use diagnostic scale, the comprehensive diagnostic scale for game behavior is a 'high risk group' classified as a problem group as well as a non-benefit group, and a 'boundary' group classified as a good use group and a problem group at the same time. It is classified into four groups consisting of 'the general user group', which is classified as a normal group as well as the non-preferential group, and the 'game good use group' which is classified as a good and normal group at the same time.

The game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale is a general method for diagnosing game over-immersion, and the present invention uses the PPAT problem-solving ability evaluation criteria applicable to the game over-immersion test, and the problem-solving ability using the game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale evaluation criteria. It may be characterized in that it is provided through an evaluation learning model.

The problem-solving ability evaluation standard is prepared by the problem-solving ability evaluation learning model, and the problem-solving ability evaluation learning model is divided into the general user group (including the general user group and the game-use group) and the over-immersion group divided through the comprehensive game behavior diagnostic scale. (Including high-risk group and boundary group) It is derived by learning the solution within the picture area shown in each picture area as learning data. Alternatively, the problem-solving ability evaluation learning model may be derived by learning the solution in the picture area shown in each picture area of the general user group, the game-use group, the high-risk group, and the boundary group as learning data.

Therefore, as the amount of learning data increases, more accurate evaluation criteria are prepared, and there is an effect that the inspection accuracy can be further advanced.

The user group classification by the game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale may be classified by a well-known general method, but it is possible to classify the user into one of the high-risk group, the boundary group, the general user group, and the game-use group based on the criteria prepared by the game behavior evaluation learning model. may be

At this time, the game behavior evaluation learning model is derived by learning the user's answer to the game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale questionnaire and the user's actual game use data as learning data.

The user answer is obtained by a user interface provided to obtain an answer to the questionnaire examination, and the game use data includes at least one of the user's game usage and the user's game usage pattern acquired in the computer.

There is an effect that a more accurate classification standard can be prepared by learning the user classification identified by the actual user's game usage, game usage pattern, etc. based on the answer to the questionnaire. In addition, as the amount of learning data increases, a more accurate classification criterion may be prepared.

The present invention is based on the proven picture testing method according to the results of performing the PPAT picture test for users classified according to the game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale in two ways: drawing paper and tablet PC.

Specifically, the high-risk group and the alert group were classified into the over-immersion group according to the comprehensive game behavior diagnostic scale, and the general user group and the game-use group were classified into the general user group, and the PPAT picture test was performed on the two taxa. .

The PPAT test consists of a formal scale test and a content scale test, and the formal scale items are coloring degree, color adequacy, inner energy, integration, logic, realism, problem-solving ability, developmental stage, detailed description of the object and surrounding environment, and line quality. , person, slope, and perseverance are composed of a total of 14 items, and the content scale items are the direction of the picture, the color used in the whole picture, the presence or absence of a person, the color used in the person, the gender of the person, the actual energy of the person, and the person It consists of a total of 13 items such as face direction, age, clothes, apple tree, apple tree color, description of the surrounding environment, and others.

The examiners were asked to draw a picture of a person picking apples from an apple tree on drawing paper and on a tablet PC without time limit.

An independent test t-test was performed for the formal scale, and X2 verification was performed for ^the content scale.

The format scale T-test analysis results for drawing paper are shown in Table 1 below.

Item general army over-immersion M SD M SD t 1. Coloring degree 2.44 .98 2.17 .75 .56 2. Appropriateness of color 3.88 .83 3.67 .82 .47 3. Inner energy 3.0 .76 3.08 .58 -.22 4. Space 3.75 .71 3.83 .41 -.26 5. Integration 3.88 .83 3.5 .84 .83 6. Logic 4.75 .46 4.83 .41 -.35 7. Realism 3.06 .82 2.58 .49 1.26 8. problem-solving skills 3.94 1.03 2.50 1.21 1.70 9. Stages of Development 3.94 .32 3.83 .26 .65 10. DETAILS OF OBJECTS AND ENVIRONMENTS 2.75 1.16 3.17 .41 -.83 11. Quality of the line 3.50 .46 3.83 .41 -1.40 12. People 3.81 1.13 4.08 .92 -.47 13. Tilt 5.00 .00 4.92 .20 1.00 14. Persistence 4.19 .37 3.92 .80 .85

In addition, the format scale T-test analysis results for the tablet PC are shown in Table 2 below.

Item general army over-immersion M SD M SD t 1. Coloring degree 2.75 1.00 2.33 1.21 .71 2. Appropriateness of color 4.00 .93 3.83 .98 .33 3. Inner energy 3.19 .84 3.17 .41 .06 4. Space 3.88 .69 3.75 .42 .39 5. Integration 4.25 .89 3.67 .52 1.43 6. Logic 4.88 .35 4.83 .41 .20 7. Realism 2.75 .76 3.00 .63 -.65 8. problem-solving skills 3.94 .56 2.50 1.22 2.67 ^** 9. Stages of Development 3.94 .18 3.92 .20 .20 10. DETAILS OF OBJECTS AND ENVIRONMENTS 3 .93 3.17 .41 -.41 11. Quality of the line 3.38 .58 3.67 .52 -.97 12. People 4.13 .83 3.67 .82 1.03 13. Tilt 5 0 5 0 - 14. Persistence 4.25 .38 3.92 1.02 .76

Looking at Table 1 and Table 2, there was no significant difference in any of the items in Table 1, which is a result based on drawing paper, but in Table 2, which is a result based on a tablet PC, question 8 of the general group measuring problem solving The average score of the group was 3.94, while the hyperimmersion group showed an average score of 2.50. The average difference between these two groups was analyzed to be significant at the p<0.05 level. As for the content scale difference analysis, the difference in the use of bright blue in the general group and the over-immersion group in the overall picture on the drawing paper is shown in Table 3 below and in the tablet PC. Table 4 below shows the difference in the use of bright blue between the general group and the hyper-immersion group in the overall picture of Korea, and Table 5 below for the difference in the use of green in the general group and the hyper-immersion group in the overall picture of the tablet PC.

Item division General number of military personnel (%) Number of people in the hyper-immersion group (%) X ² color _ light blue you 3 (37.5) 5 (83.3) 2.94* radish 5 (62.5) 1 (16.7) all - 8 (100.0) 6 (100.0)

Item division General number of military personnel (%) Number of people in the hyper-immersion group (%) X ² color _ light blue you 3 (37.5) 5 (83.3) 2.94 ^* radish 5 (62.5) 1 (16.7) all - 8 (100.0) 6 (100.0)

Item division General number of military personnel (%) Number of people in the hyper-immersion group (%) X ² color_green you 8 (100.0) 4 (66.7) 3.11 ^* radish - 2 (33.3) all - 8 (100.0) 6 (100.0)

According to Table 3 and Table 4, the difference in the presence or absence of use of bright blue in the general group and the hyper-immersion group was derived as more users in the hyper-immersion group than in the general group in the case of bright blue on both drawing paper and tablet PC, as shown in Table 5. Accordingly, in the case of abstract in tablet PC, it was derived that more people in the general group used abstract than in the hyper-immersion group. Therefore, according to the results of the above study, in general, among the formal scale items of the general group and the hyper-immersion group in the tablet PC, It was confirmed that the problem-solving ability difference analysis was effective, and accordingly, it was possible to prepare a standard for evaluating game over-immersion in the problem-solving ability item of the PPAT picture test through a tablet.

6 shows a picture drawn by a user corresponding to a general user group using a digital device and a picture drawn on paper.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a picture drawn by a user corresponding to the hyper-immersion group (boundary group) using a digital device and a picture drawn on paper.

FIG. 8 shows drawings drawn by a user who is in the hyper-immersion group (high-risk group) using a digital device and a picture drawn on paper.

6(a), 7(a), and 8(a) are drawings drawn by each user on the tablet, and FIGS. 6(b), 7(b), and 8(b) is a picture drawn by each user on drawing paper.

6, 7, and 8 show drawings drawn by the same user on drawing paper and a tablet, respectively.

First, looking at FIG. 6 , it can be seen that the drawings drawn on the tablet are expressed as delicately as possible and are carefully painted to fill most of the colors. Specifically, the outside and inside of the painting were filled with color, and a person was drawn in an appropriate human form, there is a meadow as a baseline, and an apple and a person, a meadow, a basket, and a cloud are depicted. In the problem solving section, it can be seen that the expression of a person standing on the ground and holding an apple can be seen.

The drawings on drawing paper were painted in a large area rather than delicately expressed, and the colors of trees and apples were filled in, and only the face and arms of the person and the body were omitted. He did not draw the land, only the apples, and did not describe the surroundings. In the problem-solving area, it was expressed that a person was holding an apple, but the way to reach the apple did not seem reasonable.

Referring to FIG. 7 , it was confirmed that the picture drawn on the tablet was expressed in a simple manner at the beginning, but as time passed, he was quite immersed in the drawing, and it was expressed in a sophisticated and meticulous manner. The outside and inside of the painting were filled with color, and ladders, sticks, suns and hats were depicted, but the figure of a person catching an apple in the problem solving section was not expressed.

The drawing on drawing paper focused on coloring a large area rather than expressing it in detail, expressing only the outline, and expressing the baseline, cloud, and tree stump, but the figure of a person catching an apple was not expressed in the problem solving section.

As a result, when looking at a drawing on a drawing paper, it may look like a picture that is not filled with colors and is monotonous and uses relatively low energy to look helpless, but in the picture on a tablet, a ladder, a powerful sun that seems to be exploding with heat, a stick, a ladder It can be confirmed that it can be helpful in setting up a treatment plan by better revealing the internal resources of the participant by expressing

Referring to FIG. 8 , most of the colors were painted on both the tablet and drawing paper, but in the case of a person, only the outline was shown, and although a person was holding an apple in the problem solving section, it did not appear how the apple was obtained. In the case of the tablet, grass, baskets, sun, and clouds were depicted as external environments, and in the case of drawing paper, only grass, clouds, and the sun were depicted as external environments.

As a result, when I drew with a tablet, I concentrated on depicting the apple tree and branches, rather than drawing on paper, I could see that I was more immersed when drawing with a tablet by drawing a basket that was not on the drawing paper and filling in the colors. there was. In other words, it can be seen that the picture examination through a tablet device provides an environment in which participants can express their resources as much as possible than the general picture examination.

According to the results of FIGS. 6 to 8, it was confirmed that the game over-immersion group showed 'problem-solving ability' better in the PPAT test using a tablet than the PPAT test in the drawing paper, and the present invention also performed the PPAT test using a tablet This has the effect of more clearly understanding the degree of game over-immersion.

9 is a block diagram of an apparatus 300 according to an embodiment.

The processor 302 may include one or more cores (not shown) and a graphic processing unit (not shown) and/or a connection path (eg, a bus, etc.) for transmitting and receiving signals to and from other components. .

The processor 302 according to one embodiment performs the method described with respect to FIGS. 1-8 by executing one or more instructions stored in the memory 304 .

On the other hand, the processor 302 is a RAM (Random Access Memory, not shown) and ROM (Read-Only Memory: ROM) for temporarily and / or permanently storing a signal (or, data) processed inside the processor 302 . , not shown) may be further included. In addition, the processor 102 may be implemented in the form of a system on chip (SoC) including at least one of a graphic processing unit, a RAM, and a ROM.

The memory 304 may store programs (one or more instructions) for processing and controlling the processor 302 . Programs stored in the memory 304 may be divided into a plurality of modules according to functions.

The steps of a method or algorithm described in relation to an embodiment of the present invention may be implemented directly in hardware, as a software module executed by hardware, or by a combination thereof. A software module may include random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), flash memory, hard disk, removable disk, CD-ROM, or It may reside in any type of computer-readable recording medium well known in the art to which the present invention pertains.

The components of the present invention may be implemented as a program (or application) to be executed in combination with a computer, which is hardware, and stored in a medium. Components of the present invention may be implemented as software programming or software components, and similarly, embodiments may include various algorithms implemented as data structures, processes, routines, or combinations of other programming constructs, including C, C++ , Java, assembler, etc. may be implemented in a programming or scripting language. Functional aspects may be implemented in an algorithm running on one or more processors.

In the above, the embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings, but those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains know that the present invention can be embodied in other specific forms without changing its technical spirit or essential features. you will be able to understand Therefore, it should be understood that the embodiments described above are illustrative in all respects and not restrictive.

10: computer
11: picture area
12 : digital painting tool
20: Picture input tool
302: processor
304: memory

Claims (10)

A method performed by a computer comprising:
providing a user interface including a picture area and a digital picture tool for picture inspection;
obtaining a user input input to the picture area by using the digital picture tool;
performing picture inspection evaluation on the user input; and
outputting the picture inspection evaluation result; including,
separately storing history information on the modified part using the eraser interface; and
Determining the psychological state of the user based on whether or not the picture is modified and the change according to the modification;
The step of determining the psychological state,
Using the time taken to draw the picture before revision, the time taken to erase the picture before revision after drawing the picture before revision, and the time taken to draw the picture after revision, the results of the trial according to the picture before revision and the time after revision The step of judging a picture close to the truth among the psychological results according to the picture; further including,
By comparing the time taken to draw the picture before and after the revision, the picture that took longer between the picture before revision and the picture after revision is judged as the closest to the truth,
If the time taken to erase the picture before modification is less than the preset threshold, the picture after modification is judged to be close to the true meaning. Judging by the close picture,
A picture inspection method using a digital device. According to claim 1,
repeating the steps of providing the user interface to outputting the picture inspection evaluation results at predetermined intervals or when a specific event occurs; and
Further comprising the step of outputting a comparison result comparing each picture inspection evaluation result output by the repeated execution,
A picture inspection method using a digital device. According to claim 1,
The picture inspection evaluation is,
The order in which pictures are drawn in the picture area input from the digital drawing tool, the type of each subject, the shape of each subject, the position of each subject, the pen pressure, the time it takes to draw the picture, the speed at which the picture is drawn, the picture It is to evaluate based on at least one of the change of the old picture and the new picture when the picture is modified and whether or not the picture is modified.
A picture inspection method using a digital device. According to claim 1,
providing the user with a questionnaire to obtain a user answer to the questionnaire; and
Further comprising the step of providing a final psychological test evaluation result based on the picture test evaluation result and the user answer to the questionnaire,
The step of obtaining a user answer to the questionnaire examination is,
Obtaining a user answer by at least one of the user interface and the action input unit for obtaining voice or video through recording,
The user interface is
Arranged to obtain an answer to the questionnaire examination,
A picture inspection method using a digital device. According to claim 1,
In the case of checking game hyperimmersion,
The picture inspection evaluation is,
As performed by PPAT (a Person Picking an Apple from a Tree), it is evaluated by a predetermined evaluation criterion based on the person, tree, and color of the picture drawn in the picture area,
The predetermined evaluation criterion is,
At least one of coloring degree, color adequacy, inner energy, integration, logic, realism, developmental stage, detailed description of the object and surrounding environment, line quality, person, slope, and permanence which includes evaluation,
The problem-solving ability evaluation criteria are,
To evaluate the solution presented to obtain an apple from an apple tree in the drawing area based on at least one of the order of drawing, the time spent drawing, and whether there was any deviation during the inspection.
A picture inspection method using a digital device. 6. The method of claim 5,
The problem-solving ability evaluation criteria are,
A problem derived by learning the solution in the picture area shown in each picture area of the high-risk group, the boundary group, the general user group, and the game-use group divided through the Comprehensive Scale for Assessing Game Behavior (CSG) as a learning data. It is by a learning model for evaluation of solving ability,
A picture inspection method using a digital device. 7. The method of claim 6,
The game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale CSG,
Classifying users into one of the high-risk group, the alert group, the general user group, and the game-use group based on the criteria prepared by the game behavior evaluation learning model,
The game behavior evaluation learning model is,
It is derived by learning the user's answer to the game behavior comprehensive diagnostic scale questionnaire and the user's game use data as learning data,
The user answer is to be obtained by the user interface provided to obtain an answer to the questionnaire examination,
The game usage data, the user's game usage acquired in the computer, the user's game usage pattern that includes at least one of,
A picture inspection method using a digital device. 3. The method of claim 2,
When examining game hyperimmersion,
When the specific event occurs,
In the case of using the game app in the computer or exceeding the predetermined game use standard,
A picture inspection method using a digital device. a memory storing one or more instructions; and
a processor executing the one or more instructions stored in the memory;
The processor by executing the one or more instructions,
An apparatus for performing the method of claim 1 . A computer program stored in a computer-readable recording medium in combination with a computer, which is hardware, to perform the method of claim 1.

Images