KR102114131B1 - Block chain remote storage information management system based on quantitative evaluation environment of art works - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a system for managing information of art works in a blockchain based on quantitative evaluation environment. The quantification information management system for art works according to the present invention includes a plurality of nodes for distributing and storing blocks based on an art work quantitative evaluation system and a blockchain, and one of the plurality of nodes is through the art work value evaluation system A generation module that generates transaction information as one block when the work is traded; And a transmission module that performs an agreement with other nodes associated with the blockchain and, when an agreement is reached, transmits the block to the other nodes. A first input unit for receiving information on cost evaluation criteria for calculating value and information on quantitative evaluation criteria for quantitative evaluation of the work; A second input unit that receives qualitative evaluation criteria information for the qualitative evaluation of the work from an evaluator; A cost calculating module for calculating the cost of the work based on the cost evaluation criteria information; A quantitative evaluation solution calculation module for quantitatively evaluating the work based on the quantitative evaluation reference information to calculate a quantitative evaluation solution; A qualitative evaluation amount calculation module for qualitatively evaluating the work based on the qualitative evaluation reference information to calculate a qualitative evaluation amount; And a total evaluation amount calculation module for calculating the total evaluation amount of the work by summing the calculated cost amount, quantitative evaluation amount, and qualitative evaluation amount.

Description

BLOCK CHAIN REMOTE STORAGE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BASED ON QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION ENVIRONMENT OF ART WORKS

The present invention relates to a system for managing information on a ledger in a blockchain based on the quantitative evaluation environment of the artwork.

As the evaluation of art works is done qualitatively and the transactions are closed, it is very difficult to obtain information about art works, and the information must be very inaccurate. Furthermore, as the transaction was based on closed information, the unfair trade in art works was rampant.

Furthermore, it is difficult to secure professionalism, objectivity, and reliability because the accurate information was collected due to the absence of an environment for objectively evaluating work evaluation, and it was difficult to continuously update and manage the collected information. In the related art, the collected information was managed by the central server, and accordingly, the management cost of the server was incurred, and when the central server was hacked, all information could be lost.

The characteristic part is based on the quantified art work evaluation environment, and based on this, includes the ledger information management environment using blockchain technology.

Korea Patent Office Registration Patent Publication 10-1841568

An object of the present invention for solving the above-described problems is to provide an environment for managing data of an art work information management system by a blockchain, which improves accessibility of information to an art work.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an art work information management system that provides information calculated in a quantitative evaluation environment and information on an art work in real time.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an art information management system that safely and efficiently stores and manages information on art works.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a management environment where anyone authorized to distribute information of a work.

In order to achieve the above object, it includes calculating the evaluation result through the quantitative evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and the art information management system using a block chain is based on the art work value evaluation system and the block chain. It includes a plurality of nodes for storing distributed, one of the plurality of nodes, when the work is traded through the art work value evaluation system, a generation module for generating transaction information as a block; And a transmission module that performs an agreement with other nodes associated with the blockchain and, when an agreement is reached, transmits the block to the other nodes. A first input unit for receiving information on cost evaluation criteria for calculating value and information on quantitative evaluation criteria for quantitative evaluation of the work; A second input unit that receives qualitative evaluation criteria information for the qualitative evaluation of the work from an evaluator; A cost calculating module for calculating the cost of the work based on the cost evaluation criteria information; A quantitative evaluation solution calculation module for quantitatively evaluating the work based on the quantitative evaluation reference information to calculate a quantitative evaluation solution; A qualitative evaluation amount calculation module for qualitatively evaluating the work based on the qualitative evaluation reference information to calculate a qualitative evaluation amount; And a total evaluation amount calculation module for calculating the total evaluation amount of the work by summing the calculated cost amount, quantitative evaluation amount, and qualitative evaluation amount, wherein the transaction information includes information about the producer, information about the work, and trading party For information, it may include the total valuation amount and the transaction value.

Preferably, the generation module prioritizes information included in the transaction information, and may include information on the assigned priority in the header of the block.

Preferably, the generation module generates a specific block for storing transaction information for a work corresponding to the specific category when the traded work corresponds to a specific category, and the transmission module is a block composed of the specific block The particular block can be sent to certain other nodes associated with the chain.

Preferably, the transaction information may further include the cost evaluation standard information, the quantitative evaluation standard information, the qualitative evaluation standard information, the cost of the work, the quantitative evaluation amount, and the qualitative evaluation amount.

Preferably, the cost evaluation standard information includes production period evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for the production period of the work and material cost evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for the material used in the work. And, the production period evaluation standard information includes the producer's hourly wage information, creative research time information required to create the work, and production time information required to produce the work, and the material cost evaluation standard information includes the work It may include material information indicating the type of material used in, the capacity information of the material, the price information of the material, the quantity information of the material, and the required amount information of the material.

The present invention can provide an art information management system that secures professionalism, objectivity, and reliability for an art work based on the results of a quantified evaluation system.

The present invention can provide an art work information management system that improves accessibility of information to an art work.

The present invention can provide an art work information management system that provides accurate information about an art work.

The present invention can provide an art work information management system that safely and efficiently stores and manages information on an art work.

The present invention is easy to disseminate, so it is possible to provide an environment for protecting the original work from counterfeiting by filtering out duplicate information.

The present invention can provide a transparent trading environment and a transparent trading environment of capital by preventing fraudulent transactions by sharing information among all participants.

1 is a view showing the configuration of an art information management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a view showing the configuration of one of a plurality of nodes constituting the art information management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a view showing the configuration of the art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is a view showing a method for evaluating art works according to an embodiment of the present invention.
5 is a view showing evaluation items and evaluation results by the art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for a production period of an art work.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for materials used in an art work.
8 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for a producer's industry exhibition experience.
9 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for a producer's industry exhibition experience.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for an age (debut year) of a producer.
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for a producer's education.
12 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for a genre of an art work.
13 is a diagram illustrating items considered when an art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention calculates an evaluation amount for originality of an art work.
14 is a diagram illustrating a method for storing a block chain of quantitative evaluation data according to an embodiment of the present invention.
15 is a diagram showing the composition of a quantitative evaluation item of an art work according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numerals are used for the same components in the drawings, and duplicate descriptions for the same components are omitted.

Blockchain is a linked list that has a link to the block immediately preceding it, starting with the first block (Genesis Block). The blockchain is distributed and stored and managed across multiple nodes, and since the block contains transaction information (transactions), the block chain of the block is a huge distributed ledger containing all transaction information. That is, a block is an element of a blockchain and conceptually means a bundle of a large number of transaction information (transactions). The block consists of a block header, transaction information, and other information. Blockchain

Since it uses distributed technology, it is stored on a number of PCs (multiple nodes) participating in a transaction using peer-to-peer (P2P) technology. Blocks are shared between these nodes in a chained state, so many of these nodes must be hacked to counterfeit transactions. In addition, if the transactions (transactions) are accumulated over a certain period, the nodes undergo the process of mutual agreement and the transaction contents accumulate equally. For example, if the block corresponds to a predetermined period, one of the plurality of nodes generates the corresponding transaction information as one block. This block is composed of block header and block contents including actual transaction information. Among the generated blocks, a block header is used as a parameter, and a consensus process is performed between a plurality of nodes. Then, when agreed, all nodes have the same block by sending a copy of the block to other nodes.

1 to 2, the configuration and operation of the art information management system using a blockchain according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below.

The art information management system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention may include an art value evaluation system 1010 and a plurality of nodes 110 and 120 for storing and storing blocks based on a blockchain. In this specification, the art information management system may have the same meaning as the blockchain ledger information management system based on the quantitative evaluation environment of the art work.

Each node 110 or 120 may include a generation module 210 and/or a transmission module 220. When the artwork is traded through the art work valuation system, the creation module may generate transaction information for the transaction in one block. In addition, the transmission module may perform agreement with other nodes related through the blockchain, and when the agreement is performed, the block generated by the generation module may be transmitted to other nodes. Through this process, all of the plurality of nodes can have the same block. In detail with respect to the above-described consensus process, when one of a plurality of nodes connected by a blockchain requests consensus, other nodes prepare to perform consensus with each other. Specifically, the node requested to agree multicasts a preliminary message to all nodes except itself. In addition, the nodes that have received the preliminary message again transmit the preliminary message to all nodes except themselves. Through this, all nodes receive a preliminary message from nodes other than themselves. Then, each node executes consensus with each other, and the consensus process is completed by sending a response message to the node requesting consensus. And, when a consensus is reached, the node requesting the consensus can transmit the corresponding block to other nodes. According to an embodiment, a node requesting agreement may include only header information of a corresponding block in a preliminary message and transmit it to other nodes.

According to an embodiment, the transaction information included in the block generated by the generation module may include information about the creator of the art work, information about the work, information about the trading party, the total evaluation value of the work, and the transaction value.

According to an embodiment, the generation module may prioritize information included in the transaction information, and include information about the assigned priority in the header of the block. In addition, a plurality of nodes may configure a separate blockchain based on information about priority included in the header of the block.

According to an embodiment, when the traded work corresponds to a specific category, a plurality of nodes may constitute a separate blockchain for the work corresponding to the corresponding category, wherein the generation module of each node corresponds to the corresponding category It is possible to create a separate block for storing transaction information for the work corresponding to. In addition, the transmission module of each node may transmit the separate block for the work of the corresponding category to nodes associated with a separate blockchain for the work corresponding to the corresponding category. Thus, works can be distributed and stored by category.

The art work value evaluation system 1010 is qualitative of the work from the first input unit 1020 evaluator receiving input from the producer of cost evaluation standard information for calculating the cost of the work and quantitative evaluation standard information for quantitative evaluation of the work A second input unit 1030 for receiving qualitative evaluation criteria information for evaluation, a cost calculation module 130 for calculating the cost of the work based on the cost evaluation criteria information, based on the quantitative evaluation criteria information A quantitative evaluation amount calculation module 1060 for quantitatively evaluating the work to calculate a quantitative evaluation amount, a qualitative evaluation amount calculation module 1070 for qualitatively evaluating the work based on the qualitative evaluation criteria information to calculate a qualitative evaluation amount, and/or the It may include a total evaluation amount calculation module 1080 for calculating the total evaluation amount of the work by summing the calculated cost amount, quantitative evaluation amount and qualitative evaluation amount. In the present specification, the art work value evaluation system may have the same meaning as the quantitative value evaluation system of the art work using the collective intelligence or the quantitative value evaluation system of the art work.

According to an embodiment, the cost evaluation standard information includes production period evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for a production period of a work and/or material cost evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for a material used in a work. It can contain.

According to one embodiment, the transaction information includes cost evaluation standard information, quantitative evaluation standard information, qualitative evaluation standard information, cost of the work, quantitative evaluation amount and/or qualitative evaluation amount, which are considered or calculated in the art work value evaluation system can do.

The art information management method according to another embodiment of the present invention, when a work is transacted through the art work valuation system, generating transaction information as one block and/or other nodes associated through the blockchain Consensus may be performed, and when consensus is performed, the generated block may be transmitted to other nodes. Detailed description of each step described above has been described above.

In addition, a detailed description of the configuration and operation of the art work value evaluation system 1010 will be described later.

3 to 13, the configuration and evaluation method of the art work value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below.

Art work value evaluation system 1010 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a first input unit 1020, a second input unit 1030, a production period evaluation amount calculation module 1040, a material cost evaluation amount calculation module 1050, and a quantitative evaluation amount It may include a calculation module 1060, a qualitative evaluation amount calculation module 1070 and / or a total evaluation amount calculation module 1080. According to an embodiment, the art work value evaluation system may further include a database unit (not shown) and/or a display unit (not shown).

The first input unit 1020 may receive information required to evaluate the value of the work from the producer of the work. The first input unit includes production period evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for a production period of a work, material cost evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for materials used in a work, and/or quantitative evaluation for quantitative evaluation of a work Reference information can be input. According to an embodiment, information input through the first input unit may be stored in a database unit (not shown).

The second input unit 1030 may receive qualitative evaluation criteria information for qualitative evaluation of the work from an evaluator evaluating the work. According to an embodiment, information input through the second input unit may be stored in a database unit (not shown).

The production period evaluation amount calculation module 1040 may calculate an evaluation amount corresponding to the production period of the work based on the production period evaluation standard information received through the first input unit 1020. Specifically, the production period evaluation standard information may include information about the producer's hourly wage, information on the time of creation research required to create the work, and/or information on the time of production required to produce the work. According to an embodiment, the number of producers of a work may be plural, and in this case, the first input unit may receive information about all of the plurality of producers, and work participation rate information indicating participation degree of each of the plurality of producers Can be input. Furthermore, the first input unit may receive classification information on whether the nature of the work is envisioned or unconcerned. That is, the production period evaluation reference information may include work participation rate information and/or the above-described classification information. Referring to FIG. 6, the production period evaluation amount calculation module multiplies each producer by multiplying the value indicated by hourly wage information (hourly wage information value), work participation rate information value, creative research time information value, and production time information value. By calculating the calculated total for and summing the calculated total for each producer, the evaluation amount for the production period of the corresponding work can be calculated. According to an embodiment, the production period evaluation amount calculation module may weight the evaluation amount itself for the production period of the work by additionally multiplying a weight value by multiplying all the information values received through the first input unit. At this time, the weight value may be stored in a database unit (not shown) in the art work valuation system. According to an embodiment, the production period evaluation amount calculation module may assign different weights to the creative study time and the production time of the work by multiplying the creative study time information value and the production time information value by respective weight values. At this time, the weight value may also be stored in the database unit. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated production period in a table, and FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of a screen displayed by the expression unit to be.

The material cost evaluation amount calculation module 1050 may calculate the evaluation amount for the material used in the work based on the material cost evaluation standard information received through the first input unit 1020. Specifically, the material cost evaluation standard information may include material information indicating the type of material used in the work, capacity information of the material, price information of the material, quantity information of the material, and/or information on the required amount of the material. Referring to FIG. 7, the material cost evaluation amount calculation module may calculate an evaluation amount for each material by multiplying the price information value, the quantity information value, and the required amount information value of the corresponding material for each material. In total, it is possible to calculate the evaluation amount for materials used in the work. According to an embodiment, the material cost evaluation amount calculation module may further consider whether the material is a single product or a limited edition, and in this case, the first input unit may receive information about whether the material is a single product or a limited edition. According to an embodiment, the first input unit may additionally receive large classification information, small classification information, and/or detailed information of the corresponding material, and the database unit may be configured based on the input large classification information, small classification information, and/or detailed information. Materials can be categorized and stored. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated material in a table, and FIG. 7 is an embodiment of a screen displayed by the expression unit .

The quantitative evaluation amount calculation module 1060 may quantitatively evaluate the work based on the quantitative evaluation standard information received through the first input unit 1020 to calculate a quantitative evaluation amount for the corresponding work. Specifically, the quantitative evaluation criteria information may include a producer's industry exhibition experience information, award information, age (debut year) information, education information, and/or genre information of the corresponding work. In addition, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module calculates the evaluation amount for the industry exhibition experience based on the industry exhibition experience information, calculates the evaluation amount for the award experience based on the award information, and ages based on the age (debut year) information. Calculate the evaluation amount for education, calculate the evaluation amount for education based on academic information, calculate the evaluation amount for genre based on genre information, calculate the evaluation amount for the exhibition experience in the industry, the evaluation amount for awards, and age A quantitative evaluation amount may be calculated by summing up the evaluation amount for the education, the evaluation amount for the educational background, and/or the evaluation amount for the genre. At this time, the age (debut year) information may be information about the age of the producer, and may indicate information about the age of the producer's debut.

First, with respect to the evaluation amount of the industry's exhibition experience, the industry exhibition experience information includes exhibition experience classification information for classifying the exhibition experience, information on the number of executions of the exhibition experience, information on the year of participation of the exhibition experience, and/or May include place information. For example, the exhibition experience classification information is information indicating whether the exhibition experience is a domestic exhibition experience or an overseas exhibition experience, information indicating whether the exhibition experience is an invitation exhibition, or whether the exhibition experience is an exhibition experience hosted by a national or public institution. This may include information indicating whether the organization is organized by the organization, information that can distinguish the exhibition experience (biennale, solo exhibition, planning exhibition, public project, etc.). Referring to FIG. 8, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module may calculate an evaluation amount for the exhibition experience by multiplying a predetermined weight value with respect to the exhibition experience by the information on the number of execution times of the exhibition experience. According to an embodiment, a plurality of exhibition careers may be input, and in this case, an evaluation amount for the industry's exhibition experience of the corresponding work may be calculated by summing up the evaluation amount for each exhibition career. At this time, the weight value may be set independently for each exhibition experience, and the weight value may be set in consideration of the scale, history, purpose, and venue of each exhibition career, and may be set in the form of a percentage. Furthermore, the weight values described above may be stored in the database unit. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated industry exhibition experience in a table, and FIG. 8 shows one embodiment of the screen displayed by the expression unit Yes.

With respect to the evaluation amount for an award winning, the award winning information may include award winning classification information, award history information, and/or information on the number of awards to distinguish the award. According to an embodiment, the award classification information may mean information indicating whether the corresponding award is an overseas award, a competition, an art competition, and the like. The award breakdown information value indicated by the award breakdown information may include a grand prize, a gold award, a silver award, a bronze award, an excellent award, an excellent award, a winning award, and the like. Referring to FIG. 9, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module may calculate an evaluation amount for an award winning by multiplying a weight value determined according to career classification information and/or award history information of the corresponding award winning. At this time, the weight value can be set to 2 for an award classification information abroad, 0 for a competition, 1 for an art competition, 10 for a prize history information value, 8 for a gold award, and 8 for a silver award. It can be set to 6, 4 for a bronze statue, 8 for a grand prize, 6 for a grand prize, 2 for winning, 2 for others. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated award, as a table, and FIG. 9 is an embodiment of a screen displayed by the expression unit to be.

With respect to the evaluation amount of the maker's age (debut year), referring to FIG. 10, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module sets the weight value determined according to the age (debut year) information value indicated by the input age (debut year) information. Debut year). According to an embodiment, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module may classify age (debut year) into several groups and set weight values differently according to each group. For example, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module classifies 25 to 30 years old as the first group, 31 to 35 years old as the second group, and 36 to 40 years old as the third group, and the first group has a weight value of 60 and a second group. A weight value of 80 may be set, and a weight value of 100 may be set in the third group. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated producer's age in a table, and FIG. 10 is an embodiment of a screen displayed by the expression unit to be.

With respect to the evaluation amount of the educational background of the producer, the educational information may include university name information, department information, academic course information, academic status information, and/or information on whether to study abroad indicating whether the university is a domestic university or an overseas university. Specifically, the university name information indicates the name of the university, the academic course information indicates whether the academic course is a doctorate, a master's degree, or a bachelor's degree, and the academic status information is graduation, completion, attendance, leave of absence, dropout, Whether it is training or not, the information on whether to study abroad may indicate whether the university is a domestic university or an overseas university, and if it is an overseas university, it may indicate which country the university is. Referring to FIG. 11, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module may calculate an evaluation amount for education by multiplying each weight value according to university name information, department information, academic process information, academic status information, and/or study abroad information. According to an embodiment, the weight value according to whether or not to study abroad information may be set to 100 percent for domestic and 150 percent for overseas, and the weight value according to the university name information may be set as a percentage value in consideration of the university evaluation ranking. For example, it can be set to 100% for Seoul National University and 90% for Korea National University of Arts. The weight value according to the academic process can be set to 800 for a doctor, 500 for a master, or 300 for a bachelor, and the weight value according to the academic status is 100% for graduation, 95% for completion, and 60 for enrollment The percentage can be set to 40 percent for leave, 30 percent for dropout, or 20 percent for training. According to an embodiment, the database unit may store a set weight value. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated education of the producer in a table, and FIG. 11 shows an embodiment of a screen displayed by the expression unit to be.

Regarding the evaluation amount for the genre of a work, the genre information is information about the genre to which the work belongs, for example, information indicating whether the work is a flat work, a stereoscopic work, or a digital media work, the work is a westernization or a Korean painting It may include information indicating whether it is cognitive print, calligraphy, three-dimensional modeling, video, photo, or animation, and/or information on the major of the producer who produced the work. Department information may include departments related to Western painting, contemporary art, painting, oriental painting, engraving, calligraphy, crafts, sculpture, plastic art, environmental sculpture, plastic painting, visual image design, video creation, photography and/or cartoon animation. . According to an embodiment, the genre information described above may be input from a producer through the first input unit. Further, according to another embodiment, the expression unit in the art work value evaluation system may display a table composed of genres of works, and the producer checks a corresponding item of his work among various items of the displayed table. By doing so, genre information of the corresponding work can be input. Furthermore, the above-described input method may be used when receiving reference information for other detailed evaluation amounts. Referring to FIG. 12, the quantitative evaluation amount calculation module may calculate a weight value set according to genre information as an evaluation amount for a genre of a work. According to an embodiment, the weight value is 100 for a genre of a work, 60 for a Korean painting, 30 for a printmaking, 20 for a calligraphy, 20 for a craft, 100 for stereoscopic excluding craft, digital media In case of, it can be set to 20. According to another embodiment, a weight value may be set according to a more detailed genre. According to an embodiment, the database unit may store a set weight value. Furthermore, the expression unit (not shown) may organize and display the above-described information input through the first input unit and the evaluation amount for the calculated genre of the work in a table, and FIG. 12 performs one of the screens displayed by the expression unit Yes.

The qualitative evaluation amount calculation module 1070 may qualitatively evaluate the work based on the qualitative evaluation standard information received through the second input unit 1030 to calculate a qualitative evaluation amount. Qualitative evaluation criteria information includes originality information indicating the degree of originality of the work, transmission information indicating the degree of transmission power, expressive power information indicating the degree of expressive power, preservation information indicating the degree of preservation, traditionality information indicating the degree of traditionality, and And/or may include periodicity information indicating the degree of periodicity. The qualitative evaluation amount calculation module calculates the evaluation amount for the originality of the corresponding work based on the originality information, calculates the evaluation amount for the transmission power of the corresponding work based on the transmission power information, and expresses the expression power of the corresponding work based on the expression power information. Calculate the evaluation amount, calculate the evaluation amount for the preservation of the work based on the preservation information, calculate the evaluation amount for the tradition of the work based on the traditionality information, and evaluate the evaluation amount for the timeliness of the work based on the time information After calculating, the qualitative evaluation amount can be calculated by summing the calculated evaluation value for originality, evaluation value for transmission power, evaluation value for expressive power, evaluation value for preservation, evaluation value for traditionality, and evaluation value for timeliness.

Referring to FIG. 13, this figure shows an embodiment of a screen configuration for receiving originality information that is considered when calculating an evaluation amount for originality of a corresponding work. According to an embodiment, the originality information may include information indicating whether the subject of the work is original and/or information indicating whether the work is novel and new without imitation, and the second input unit scores the originality information of the above-described work. It can be input from the evaluator in the form of. According to an embodiment, the evaluation item information for receiving the originality information may be stored in the database unit, and the display unit may constitute and display the above-mentioned evaluation item and score table. According to one embodiment, the system may use the above-described input method even when other qualitative evaluation criteria information is input in addition to originality information. According to an embodiment, the transmission power information may include information indicating whether the message transmission power of the corresponding work is clear and/or information indicating whether the corresponding work is understood and persuasive, and the expressive power information indicates the realism of the work. Information, information indicating the completeness of the work and/or information indicating the rationality of the work may be included, and the preservation information may include information indicating the durability of the work and/or information indicating the properties of the material of the work. The traditionality information may include information indicative of the degree of traditional succession of the work, information indicative of the modernity of the work, and/or information indicative of the creativity of the work, and periodicity information indicative of the historicity of the work It may include information, information representing the spirit of the work and/or information representing the mentality of the work.

The total evaluation amount calculation module 1080 may calculate the total evaluation amount of the corresponding work by summing up the evaluation amount for the calculated production period, the evaluation amount for the material, the quantitative evaluation amount, and the qualitative evaluation amount. According to an embodiment, the total evaluation amount calculation module may calculate the cost of the work by summing up the evaluation amount for the production period of the calculated work and the evaluation amount for materials used in the work. In addition, the total evaluation amount calculation module may calculate a commission fee based on the total evaluation amount of the calculated work, and set the calculated commission fee as a reconnaissance price of the corresponding work. Referring to FIG. 5, the total evaluation amount calculation module includes an evaluation amount for a production period, an evaluation amount for a material, an evaluation amount for an industry exhibition career, an evaluation amount for an award winning, an evaluation amount for an age of a producer, an evaluation amount for an education degree of a producer, and a work Independent of each evaluation amount for the genre, evaluation for the originality of the work, evaluation for the delivery power of the work, evaluation for the expressive power of the work, evaluation for the preservation of the work, evaluation for the traditionality of the work, and evaluation for the timeliness of the work The application rate can be applied. For example, by applying a 100% coverage rate for an industry's exhibition experience, an 80% coverage rate for an award's career can be used to weight the industry's exhibition experience rather than the award-winning experience when calculating the total evaluation of a work. In addition, the total evaluation amount calculation module may calculate the result value obtained by multiplying the evaluation amount calculated primarily by the application rate set as the second evaluation amount. In addition, the secondary evaluation amount of each item can be summed up and calculated as the final total evaluation value of the work. According to an embodiment, for a work whose evaluation has been completed, information about the affiliation, name, date of birth, address, e-mail address, debut date and/or contact information of the producer, evaluation date, title, year of production, and content of the work Summary, material and/or information about the work specification may be additionally input, and the inputted information may be stored in the database unit. Furthermore, a report showing the evaluation amount and the total evaluation amount calculated for each evaluation item for the work can be displayed through the display unit and stored in the database unit.

Art work value evaluation method according to another embodiment of the present invention, production period evaluation standard information for calculating the evaluation price for the production period of the work from the producer, material cost for calculating the evaluation price for the material used in the work Step of receiving evaluation criteria information and quantitative evaluation criteria information for quantitative evaluation of the work (S2010), Step of receiving qualitative evaluation criteria information for qualitative evaluation of the work from an evaluator (S2020), Evaluation criteria of the production period Calculating an evaluation amount for the production period of the work based on (S2030), calculating an evaluation amount for the material used in the work based on the material cost evaluation reference information (S2040), and calculating the quantitative evaluation reference information Quantitative evaluation of the work as a basis to calculate a quantitative evaluation amount (S2050), Qualitative evaluation of the work based on the qualitative evaluation reference information to calculate a qualitative evaluation amount (S2060) and/or in the calculated production period It may include the step of calculating the total evaluation amount of the work by summing the evaluation amount for the material, the evaluation amount for the material, the quantitative evaluation amount and the qualitative evaluation amount (S2070).

Detailed description of each step described above has been described above.

14 is a diagram illustrating a method for storing a block chain of quantitative evaluation data according to an embodiment of the present invention.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, data input to the system of the present invention, including quantitative evaluation data, may be stored in the form of a blockchain with a linear structure and/or a blockchain with a two-dimensional structure.

15 is a diagram showing the composition of a quantitative evaluation item of an art work according to an embodiment of the present invention.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the quantitative evaluation item of the art work may include information on the production period, material cost, exhibition experience, award history, age (debut year), education (study abroad), and/or genre. Detailed description of the quantitative evaluation items described above has been described above.

In this specification, the node, generation module, transmission module, first input unit, second input unit, cost calculation module, production period evaluation amount calculation module, material cost evaluation amount calculation module, quantitative evaluation amount calculation module, qualitative evaluation amount calculation module, total evaluation amount calculation module, The database and/or the display unit may be processors that execute successive processes stored in the memory. Or, it can operate as software modules driven and controlled by the processor. Furthermore, the processor may be a hardware device.

For reference, the art information management method and/or the art value evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention may be recorded in a computer readable medium by being implemented in the form of program instructions that can be performed through various computer means. The computer-readable medium may include program instructions, data files, data structures, or the like alone or in combination. The program instructions recorded on the medium may be specially designed and configured for the present invention or may be known and usable by those skilled in computer software. Examples of computer-readable media include magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks and magnetic tapes, optical recording media such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, magnetic-optical media such as floptical disks, and ROM, RAM, Hardware devices specifically configured to store and execute program instructions, such as flash memory, may be included. Examples of program instructions include high-level language codes that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter, as well as machine codes such as those produced by a compiler. The hardware device described above may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the operation of the present invention, and vice versa.

The scope of protection of the present invention is not limited to the description and expression of the embodiments explicitly described above. In addition, it is once again pointed out that the scope of the present invention may not be limited by the obvious changes or substitutions in the technical field to which the present invention pertains.

100: art work information management system
130: cost calculation module
110, 120: node
210: generation module
220: transmission module
1010: Art work valuation system
1020: first input unit
1030: second input unit
1040: production period evaluation amount calculation module
1050: material cost evaluation amount calculation module
1060: quantitative evaluation amount calculation module
1070: Qualitative evaluation amount calculation module
1080: Total evaluation amount calculation module

Claims (5)

An art information management system that includes a plurality of nodes that store and store information data calculated from a quantitative value evaluation system of art in a block based on a blockchain environment,
One of the plurality of nodes includes: a generation module that generates transaction information as one block when a work is traded based on information calculated through the quantitative value evaluation system of the art work; It includes; and a transmission module for performing an agreement with other nodes associated with the blockchain, and when the agreement is performed, transmitting the block to the other nodes.
The quantitative value evaluation system of the art work includes: a first input unit that receives information on cost evaluation criteria for calculating the cost of a work and information on quantitative evaluation criteria for quantitative evaluation of the work; A second input unit that receives qualitative evaluation criteria information for the qualitative evaluation of the work from an evaluator; A cost calculating module for calculating the cost of the work based on the cost evaluation criteria information; A quantitative evaluation solution calculation module for quantitatively evaluating the work based on the quantitative evaluation reference information to calculate a quantitative evaluation solution; A qualitative evaluation amount calculation module for qualitatively evaluating the work based on the qualitative evaluation reference information to calculate a qualitative evaluation amount; And a total evaluation amount calculation module for calculating the total evaluation amount of the work by summing the calculated cost amount, quantitative evaluation amount, and qualitative evaluation amount.
The transaction information includes information on the producer, information on the work, information on the trading party, the total valuation amount and the transaction value,
The first input unit further receives single piece information indicating whether the material used in the work is a single item and limited item information indicating whether the material used in the work is a limited edition,
The material cost evaluation amount calculation module calculates an evaluation amount for the material used in the work in consideration of the single item availability information and the limited edition information,
The first input unit additionally receives large classification information, sub-classification information, and detailed information of the materials used in the work, and details of the materials used in the work are large classification information, small classification information, and details input to the first input unit. Categorized based on information and stored in the database,
When the number of producers of the work is plural, the first input unit further receives work participation rate information indicating participation degree of each of the plurality of producers, and the production period evaluation amount calculation module, for each producer, the hourly wage By multiplying all the values for information, work participation rate information, participation rate information, creative research time information, and production time information, the calculated total amount for each producer is calculated, and the calculated total amount for each producer is summed to produce the work. Calculate the evaluation amount for
The quantitative evaluation criterion information includes the industry's exhibition experience information of the producer, the award information of the producer, age information of the producer, education information of the producer, and genre information of the work,
The quantitative evaluation amount calculation module calculates the evaluation amount for the industry's exhibition experience based on information on the number of times the producer has performed exhibition experience, information on the year of participation in the exhibition experience, and place information on the exhibition experience, and based on the award information After calculating an evaluation amount for, calculating an evaluation amount for age based on the age information, calculating an evaluation amount for education based on the education information, calculating an evaluation amount for a genre based on the genre information, Art work information management system characterized by calculating a quantitative evaluation amount by summing up the calculated evaluation amount for the exhibition experience, evaluation amount for award winnings, evaluation amount for age, evaluation amount for education, and evaluation for genre. The method according to claim 1,
The generating module prioritizes the information included in the transaction information, and includes the information on the assigned priority in the header of the block, the art work information management system. The method according to claim 1,
The generation module generates a specific block for storing transaction information for the work corresponding to the specific category, when the traded work corresponds to a specific category,
The transmission module transmits the specific block to specific other nodes associated with the block chain composed of the specific block, the art information management system. The method according to claim 1,
The transaction information, art work information management system, characterized in that it further comprises the cost evaluation standard information, the quantitative evaluation standard information, the qualitative evaluation standard information, the cost of the work, the quantitative evaluation amount and the qualitative evaluation amount. The method according to claim 1,
The cost evaluation standard information includes production period evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for the production period of the work and material cost evaluation standard information for calculating an evaluation price for materials used in the work,
The production period evaluation criterion information includes the producer's hourly wage information, creative research time spent creating the work, and production time information required to produce the work,
The material cost evaluation standard information includes material information indicative of the type of material used in the work, capacity information of the material, price information of the material, quantity information of the material, and requirement information of the material Works information management system.

Images