KR102088861B1 - Repellent composition of harmful wild animal and preparation method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a repellent composition of harmful wild animals, comprising: 0.05 to 10 wt% of oregano essential oil; 0.1 to 20 wt% of thyme essential oil; 0.2 to 30 wt% of clove essential oil; 0.02 to 10 wt% of creosote essential oil; 0.05 to 10 wt% of indole; 0.2 to 20 wt% of tea tree essential oil; 0.2 to 20 wt% of eucalyptus essential oil; 0.2 to 20 wt% of cinnamon essential oil; 50 to 93 wt% of a hardener; 2 to 10 wt% of ceramic; 0.2 to 1 wt% of a coating agent; and 1 to 10 wt% of an emulsifier.

Description

Repellent composition of harmful wild animal and preparation method thereof

The present invention relates to a repellent composition of a harmful wild animal and a method for manufacturing the same, more specifically, a repellent composition of a harmful wild animal that stably releases a repellent material using a coating agent after incorporating the repellent material of the wild animal into a ceramic porous body And a method for manufacturing the same.

Every year, property damage such as crops caused by wild animals, environmental damage that destroys the initial coniferous forest and causes deterioration of growth, and human damage appearing in urban areas are also increasing.

Looking at the animals that damage the crops, wild boar, elk, pheasant, magpie, and blue-green wool have appeared in various ways. The damage of each crop to wild animals is gradually decreasing, but it can be seen that this reduction trend is somewhat reduced by using aggressive physical control methods for the damage of wild animals at farms. However, these methods are not excellent in terms of the effectiveness of the control, and also cause a lot of burden and loss to the farmer even in the economic aspect.

Existing wild animal extermination method used to protect crops and facilities from wild animals, such as visual products using sunlight or reflectors, acoustic products using speakers or blasters, and contact products using electric fences, Physical products using traps and olfactory products using cresols and fragrances are mainly used.

However, the above methods have been widely used to control wild animals that damage crops and facilities, but have shortcomings such as short duration or high cost of combating wild animals.

The visual stimulation method, tactile stimulation method, auditory stimulation method, and physical method of combating wild animals used as a method for combating wild animals may cause problems such as cost, safety, convenience of installation, and maintenance and repair of facilities. In addition, the existing methods of combating these methods are unreliable or only temporary.

In order to overcome the disadvantages of the method for combating wild animals as described above, Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1481488 (2015.01.06.) Discloses a solid composition for combating wild animals using a chemical stimulation method.

However, the solid composition for combating wild animals exerts excellent efficacy for large harmful animals such as wild boar, elk, and roe deer as a solid substance in which a repellent is added to the soap base, which is a curing agent, but is effective for small harmful animals such as raccoons, blue-eyed wool, and rats. There is a disadvantage that this is somewhat inferior, the extent of expansion of harmful animals is rather low, and the evasion efficacy for harmful wild animals is about 50 to 60 days, so it is necessary to extend the efficacy period.

The object of the present invention for solving the above problems is to exert excellent repelling efficacy against large harmful animals such as wild boar, elk, roe deer and small harmful animals such as raccoons, blue eyes, rats, and repelling efficacy periods for wild animals. An object of the present invention is to provide a repellent composition for harmful wildlife that can be extended and a method for manufacturing the same.

The repellent composition of the harmful wild animal of the present invention for achieving the above object is oregano essential oil 0.05 to 10% by weight, thyme essential oil 0.1 to 20% by weight, clove essential oil 0.2 to 30% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.02 to 10% by weight, 0.05 to 10% by weight of indole, 0.2 to 20% by weight of tea tree essential oil, 0.2 to 20% by weight of eucalyptus essential oil, 0.2 to 20% by weight of cinnamon essential oil, 50 to 93% by weight of hardener, 2 to 10% by weight of ceramic, 0.2 to 1% of coating agent It characterized in that it contains 1% to 10% by weight, and emulsifier.

The curing agent may use a soap base.

The ceramic may have a diameter of 0.1 to 10 mm and a water content of 1 to 10%.

The coating agent may be any one of silica sol, inorganic binder, and nanocomposite resin.

The emulsifier may use sorbitan fatty acid ester.

The emulsifier may use any one or two or more mixtures selected from the group consisting of sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monostearate and sorbitan monobehenate.

In addition, the method for manufacturing a repellent composition for harmful wild animals of the present invention is oregano essential oil 0.05 ~ 10% by weight, thyme essential oil 0.1 ~ 20% by weight, clove essential oil 0.2 ~ 30% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.02 ~ 10% by weight, indole 0.05 ~ 10 Preparing a harmful animal repellent by mixing weight%, tea tree essential oil 0.2-20% by weight, eucalyptus essential oil 0.2-20% by weight, cinnamon essential oil 0.2-20% by weight; After the repellent is incorporated into a ceramic, coating with any one of a silica sol, an inorganic binder, and a nanocomposite resin; Adding and mixing an emulsifier sorbitan fatty acid ester and a curing agent soap base to the coated ceramic; And after mixing the soap base molding in a molding machine; including, but, the coating agent, emulsifier, curing agent, and ceramic, respectively 0.2 to 1% by weight of the total weight of the repellent, 1 to 10% by weight, 50 to 93% by weight %, And 2 to 10% by weight.

The molding may be performed by applying 5 to 50 rpm of rotational speed at a molding machine temperature of 50 to 90 ° C.

As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to exert a repelling effect on large harmful animals such as wild boar, elk, roe deer, and small harmful animals such as raccoon dogs, blue wool, and rats.

In addition, according to the present invention, it is possible to extend the repelling efficacy period for harmful animals by impregnating the ceramic of the repellent components, coating with silica sol, and curing with a soap base, thereby showing a stable release effect of the repellent components.

1 is a flow chart of a method for preparing a repellent composition for harmful wild animals according to the present invention.

Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains may easily practice. However, the present invention can be implemented in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein.

Then, the repellent composition of harmful wild animals according to the present invention will be described.

The repellent composition of the harmful wild animal of the present invention is composed of a main component and a sub-component, and the main component includes oregano essential oil, thyme essential oil, clove essential oil, creosote essential oil, indole, tea tree essential oil, eucalyptus essential oil, cinnamon essential oil, and the sub-component Hardeners, ceramics, coatings, and emulsifiers.

The repellent composition is the main component oregano essential oil 0.05 to 10% by weight, thyme essential oil 0.1 to 20% by weight, clove essential oil 0.2 to 30% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.02 to 10% by weight, indole 0.05 to 10% by weight, tea tree essential oil 0.2 to 20% by weight, 0.2 to 20% by weight of eucalyptus essential oil, 0.2 to 20% by weight of cinnamon essential oil, 50 to 93% by weight of curing agent as a minor component, 2 to 10% by weight of ceramic, 0.2 to 1% by weight of coating agent, and 1 to 10% of emulsifier %.

The oregano essential oil contains carvacrol as a main active ingredient, and may exhibit a repellent effect due to a stimulating effect of chemesthetic, olfactory and palate with a strong irritating volatile fragrance. In addition, it has the advantage that the initial irritation is strong, not the repelling effect due to contact or ingestion, and also has excellent repelling effect against antibacterial, antifungal, and pests. It can be suppressed that the effectiveness of the repellent is reduced. The oregano essential oil is used in an amount of 0.05 to 10% by weight, preferably 0.25 to 7% by weight of the total weight of the total composition. At this time, if the oregano essential oil is used in less than 0.05% by weight of the total composition, the antibacterial and antifungal effects may decrease, and contamination of the composition by bacteria and fungi may occur, and when it is used in excess of 10% by weight, hardness decreases. Can cause problems.

The thyme essential oil contains thymol as a main active ingredient, and may exhibit a repellent effect due to a stimulating effect of chemesthetic, olfactory and palate with a strong irritating volatile fragrance. In addition, it has the advantage that the initial irritation is strong, not the repelling effect due to contact or ingestion, and also has excellent repelling effect against antibacterial, antifungal, and pests. It can be suppressed that the effectiveness of the repellent is reduced. The thyme essential oil is used in an amount of 0.1 to 20% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, preferably 0.5 to 12% by weight. At this time, when thyme essential oil is used in less than 0.1% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, the antibacterial and antifungal effects may decrease, and contamination of the composition by bacteria and fungi may occur, and when used in excess of 20% by weight, hardness decreases. Can be caused.

The clove essential oil contains eugenol as a main active ingredient, and may exhibit repelling effects due to chemesthetic, olfactory and taste stimulating effects with a strong irritating volatile fragrance. In addition, it has the advantage of strong initial stimulation rather than repelling effect due to contact or ingestion, and has excellent antibacterial and antifungal effects and repelling effect against pests. It is possible to suppress the decrease in the effectiveness of the animal repellent. The clove essential oil is used in 0.2 to 30% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, preferably 1 to 15% by weight. At this time, if the clove essential oil is used in less than 0.2% by weight of the total amount of the total composition, antibacterial and antifungal effects may decrease, and contamination by bacteria and fungi of the composition may occur, and when used in excess of 30% by weight, hardness decreases. Problems can arise.

The creosote essential oil contains guaiacol and monophenol as the main active ingredients, and can exhibit a repelling effect by feeling the stimulating effect of chemesthetic, olfactory and taste by soot components with strong irritation. In addition, it has the advantage of having strong initial stimulation rather than repelling effect due to contact or ingestion, and also has antibacterial and antifungal effects, thus preventing external contamination or spoilage of the composition after installation of the repelling agent for wild animals, thereby reducing the effectiveness of wild animal repellent agents. Can be suppressed. The creosote essential oil is used in 0.02 to 10% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, preferably 0.08 to 5% by weight. At this time, when the creosote essential oil is used in less than 0.02% by weight of the total composition, the antiseptic effect may be reduced and the repelling efficacy of wild animals may be reduced, and when it is used in excess of 10% by weight, the fragrance of other ingredients is reduced and the hardness is reduced. Can cause problems.

The indole (indole) is a solid at room temperature, occurs naturally in human feces and has an intense smell of defecation. It can exhibit a repelling effect due to the stimulating effect of chemesthetic, smell and taste by such a strong smell. The indole is used in 0.05 to 10% by weight, preferably 0.1 to 7.5% by weight of the total weight of the total composition. At this time, if the indole is used in less than 0.05% by weight of the total amount of the total composition, there is a problem that the repelling effect on wild animals is reduced, and when it is used in excess of 10% by weight, the problem of reducing the aroma of other ingredients and decreasing the hardness is caused. Can be.

The essential oil of tea tree contains terpinene (γ-terpinene) and terpineol (4-terponeol) as main active ingredients, and can exhibit a repelling effect by stimulating effects of chemesthetic, olfactory and palate of strong volatile components. have. In addition, it has the advantage of having strong initial stimulation rather than repelling effect due to contact or ingestion, and has excellent repelling effect against deodorization, antibacterial, antifungal, and pest, and prevents external pollution or spoilage after installation of the repelling agent for wild animals. Can reduce the effect of The tea tree essential oil is used in 0.2 to 20% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, preferably 0.7 to 13% by weight. At this time, if the tea tree essential oil is used in less than 0.2% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, the antibacterial and antifungal effects may decrease, and contamination by bacterial and fungal agents of wild animal repellent may occur. A decreasing problem can be caused.

The eucalyptus essential oil contains cineol (1,8-cineole) as a main active ingredient, and can exhibit a repelling effect by making it feel the stimulating effect of chemesthetic, olfactory and taste of volatile components. In addition, it has the advantage that the initial irritation is strong rather than the repellent effect due to contact or ingestion, and has a sterilizing effect, thereby preventing external contamination after the repellent of the wild animal is prevented, thereby suppressing the reduction of the repellent effect of the wild animal. The eucalyptus essential oil is used in 0.2 to 20% by weight of the total weight of the total composition, preferably 1 to 15% by weight. At this time, if cedarwood essential oil is used in less than 0.2% by weight of the total repellent total charge, the effect of sterilization decreases, and if it is used in excess of 20% by weight, a problem of decreasing hardness may occur.

The cinnamon essential oil contains cinnamic aldehyde as the main active ingredient, and can exhibit a repelling effect by making it feel the stimulating effect of chemesthetic, olfactory and taste of volatile components. In addition, there is an advantage that the initial stimulation is strong, not the avoidance effect due to contact or ingestion. The Cinnaon essential oil is used in 0.2 to 20% by weight, preferably 1 to 15% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent. At this time, if the cinnamon essential oil is used in less than 0.2% by weight of the total repellent total charge, the effect of sterilization decreases, and when it is used in excess of 20% by weight, a problem of decreasing hardness may occur.

As the curing agent, a soap base is used, and the soap base promotes curing and increases hardness of the wildlife repellent, so that the animal repellent is caused by moisture infiltrating into the animal repellent in humid climate areas such as snow or rain. By preventing loss or degeneration of the main component of the animal, it maintains the stability of the wild animal repellent agent and acts to sustain the wild animal repelling effect. The curing agent is used 50 to 93% by weight, preferably 70 to 88% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent. At this time, when the curing agent is used in less than 50% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent, the property of curing may be unstable, resulting in loss of repellent. When used in excess of 93% by weight, the main component for repelling wild animals is reduced, thereby avoiding wildlife. Problems with reduced effectiveness may occur. The soap base (soap base) is used in the manufacture of a conventional soap, it is possible to use a commercially available product. The soap base is, for example, alkaline, obtained by directly saponifying or neutralizing oil (or fatty acids thereof) selected from animal or vegetable oils such as tallow, palm, palm, palm kernel oil with caustic soda (NaOH) or caustic potassium (KOH). Fatty acid salts and the like can be used.

The ceramic has a characteristic of incorporating a material in a ceramic porosity as a repellent material of a harmful wild animal as a porous inclusion body. The diameter of the ceramic is 0.1 to 10 mm, and the moisture content is characterized by being 1 to 10%. If the diameter of the ceramic is 0.1 or less, the amount of inclusion is too small, the action period of the evasion efficacy cannot be extended, and when it is 10 mm or more, the shape of the formulation may be inconsistent. The ceramic is used in 2 to 10% by weight, preferably 5 to 8% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent. At this time, if the ceramic is used in less than 2% by weight of the total weight of the repellent, the hardness of the repellent formulation is low, and a constant molding may cause loss of the repellent, and when it is used in excess of 10% by weight, the cohesive strength of the repellent is reduced. The surface of the formulation is rough and can easily disintegrate.

The coating agent may serve to uniformly release the repellent material in the porosity by incorporating a wild animal repellent material in the ceramic porous body and then treating it with a coating agent. The coating agent may be a silica sol, an inorganic binder, a nanocomposite resin, or the like, preferably a silica sol coating agent. The coating agent is used 0.2 to 1% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent, preferably 0.3 to 0.7% by weight. At this time, when less than 0.2% by weight of the total weight of the repellent is used, the porous coating of the ceramic is not completely achieved, and thus the release rate of the repellent material in the porosity can rapidly progress. When used in excess of 1% by weight, the repellent material in the porosity of the ceramic Can cause induction of release out of porosity.

As the emulsifier, sorbitan fatty acid esters, which are variously used as emulsifiers and dispersants, such as pigments, printing inks, paints, textile aids, and lubricants, are used for industrial purposes, and the emulsifiers are natural plant essential oils, which are the main components of wild animal repellents. It is used for the purpose of evenly dispersing in the repellent. The sorbitan fatty acid ester is selected from the group consisting of sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monostearate, and sorbitan monobehenate, depending on the type of fatty acid. Mixtures can be used. Preferably sorbitan monooleate is used. The emulsifier is used in 1 to 10% by weight, preferably 3 to 7% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent. At this time, when the emulsifier is used in less than 1% by weight of the total weight of the repellent, the degree of emulsification of the repellent in the repellent may be reduced, so that the repellent may not be evenly mixed. The effect of reducing the repellent effect and the inhibitory effect of the present repellent agent may be reduced.

Hereinafter, a method for preparing a harmful wildlife repellent composition according to the present invention will be described.

Referring to Figure 1, the method for preparing a repellent composition for harmful wild animals according to the present invention, first, prepare a repellent for harmful animals (S100).

Here, the repellent is oregano essential oil 0.05 to 10% by weight, thyme essential oil 0.1 to 20% by weight, clove essential oil 0.2 to 30% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.02 to 10% by weight, indole 0.05 to 10% by weight, tea tree essential oil 0.2 to 20 Weight%, eucalyptus essential oil 0.2 to 20% by weight, cinnamon essential oil 0.2 to 20% by weight is mixed.

Subsequently, the repellent is impregnated into the ceramic and then coated with a coating agent (S200).

Here, the ceramic has a diameter of 0.1 to 10 mm, a water content of 1 to 10% is used, and 2 to 10% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent.

The coating agent uses any one of silica sol, inorganic binder, and nanocomposite resin, preferably silica sol, and 0.2 to 1% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent.

Next, an emulsifier and a curing agent are added to and mixed with the coated ceramic (S300).

Here, the emulsifier uses sorbitan fatty acid ester, preferably selected from the group consisting of sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monostearate and sorbitan monobehenate. Any one or two or more mixtures are used. At this time, the emulsifier uses 1 to 10% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent.

The curing agent uses a soap base, 50 to 93% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent.

Next, after mixing the soap base, it is molded in a molding machine (S400).

At this time, the molding is performed by applying a rotational speed of 5 to 50 rpm at a molding machine temperature of 50 to 90 ° C.

Hereinafter, the configuration and effects of the present invention will be described in more detail through examples. These examples are only for illustrating the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited by these examples.

Oregano essential oil, thyme essential oil, clove essential oil, creosote essential oil, indole, acetic acid, and an emulsifier were mixed evenly in a mixer, and a soap base was added to the mixer to perform mixing. The mixture was heated with a molding machine (70 ° C, 20 rpm) to prepare a solid wildlife repellent.

At this time, the content of each component is oregano essential oil 0.25% by weight, thyme essential oil 3.0% by weight, clove essential oil 2.0% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.5% by weight, indole 0.5% by weight, acetic acid 0.5% by weight, sorbitan monooleate 5.25% by weight, And soap base 88% by weight.

Oregano essential oil, thyme essential oil, clove essential oil, creosote essential oil, indole, tea tree essential oil, eucalyptus essential oil, and cinnamon essential oil are mixed evenly in a mixer, and a ceramic porous body is added thereto to impregnate the porous material with a repellent material and to coat the silica sol Was sprayed to perform surface treatment. Next, an emulsifier and a soap base were added to mix.

The mixture was heated with a molding machine (70 ° C, 20 rpm) to prepare a repellent for harmful wild animals.

At this time, the content of each component is oregano essential oil 0.25% by weight, thyme essential oil 3.0% by weight, clove essential oil 2.0% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.5% by weight, indole 0.5% by weight, tea tree essential oil 0.5% by weight, eucalyptus essential oil 0.5% by weight, cinnamon 1.25% by weight essential oil, 2.0% by weight ceramic, 0.2% by weight coating agent, 1.3% by weight sorbitan monooleate, and 88% by weight soap base were used.

[Experimental Example 1] Evasion efficacy of solid animal repellent in breeding pigs

1. Experimental method

The animal used in the test was a breeding pig (male) of the Landrace × Yorkshire hybrid, and the repelling efficacy of the solid animal repellent was confirmed through feed intake. The above breeding pigs are widely used in the field of animal experiments and are sensitive to the sense of smell, like wild boar, so they are suitable for judging the repelling effect, and are disclosed as test animals.

The male breeding pigs (n = 27) were tested on a HACCP certified pig farm near Geumsan. Healthy individuals ranging in weight from 10 to 15 Kg were randomly selected from 9 animals and divided into 3 groups (control, Example 1 and Example 2) in the test, and published in the test. After a week of purification, the experiment was conducted, and feed and negative water were freely fed.

To confirm the repelling effect of the wild animal repellents carried out in Examples 1 and 2, the compositions of Examples 1 and 2 (30 × 30 × 40 mm) were installed in each of the feeders of Examples 1 and 2 in groups of 5, and not in the control group. Did. After feeding and drinking water, feed intake and behavior of fostered pigs were observed for 14 days.

2. Test results

During the acclimatization period, all upbringing money was consumed alternately between the feeder and negative tap, and no abnormal behavior was observed. After the solid-state wildlife repellent was installed, the breeding pigs of Examples 1 and 2 approached the feeder, and repeated actions such as retreating back, rubbing the nose to the floor, and sneezing were frequently observed.

As shown in Table 1, the daily feed intake for the rearing money of Examples 1 and 2 during the test period was 39.7% and 57.9% decrease, respectively, compared to the control group.

In addition, the daily feed intake of the composition of Example 2 was reduced by 45.9% compared to the composition of Example 1, and it was confirmed that the repelling efficacy of the composition of Example 2 was more excellent.

(Kg) 0 days 7 days 14 days Daily feed intake Control 1.22 ± 0.12 1.53 ± 0.10 1.67 ± 0.05 1.49 ± 0.17 Example 1 0.98 ± 0.05 0.89 ± 0.02 0.87 ± 0.07 0.90 ± 0.05 Example 2 0.70 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.05 0.56 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.04

[Experimental Example 2] Evaluation of evasion efficacy of solid wild animal repellent in rats

1. Experimental method

The animals used in the test were male rats of the Sprague Dawley strain of 6 weeks of age, and the repelling efficacy of the solid animal repellent was confirmed through feed intake. The above rats are widely used in the field of animal experiments on rodents, and thus are disclosed as test animals.

Healthy individuals with a weight range of 250 to 280 g were randomly selected (n = 27) and divided into three groups (control, Example 1, Example 2) for testing, and made of stainless steel mesh breeding box (W215 × L355 ×). H200mm). After a week of purification, the experiment was conducted, and feed and negative water were freely fed.

In order to confirm the repelling effect of the wild animal repellents carried out in Examples 1 and 2, the compositions of Examples 1 and 2 (30 × 30 × 40 mm) were installed one by one in the feed bins of Examples 1 and 2 and not installed in the control group. Did. After feeding and drinking water, the feed intake and behavior of the rats were observed for 14 days.

2. Test results

In the rats of Examples 1 and 2, the approaching and retracting movement of the feeder, the phenomenon of gathering in the corner, the squat and the turning phenomenon were observed, and no unusual behavior was observed in the control group.

As shown in Table 2, the daily feed intake for the rats of Examples 1 and 2 during the test period was 23.0% and 28.3%, respectively, decreased compared to the control group.

In addition, it was confirmed that the daily feed intake of the composition of Example 2 was reduced by 23.3% compared to the composition of Example 1, and the repelling efficacy of the composition of Example 2 was more excellent.

(g) 0 days 7 days 14 days Daily feed intake Control 20.4 ± 1.2 25.5 ± 3.2 27.8 ± 2.8 24.8 ± 2.8 Example 1 20.9 ± 0.5 19.0 ± 1.1 18.5 ± 0.9 19.1 ± 1.0 Example 2 20.1 ± 0.6 17.2 ± 0.8 16.0 ± 1.2 17.8 ± 1.2

[Experimental Example 3] Evasion efficacy of solid animal repellent in rabbits

1. Experimental method

The animals used in the test were male rabbits of the New Zealand White lineage of 4 months of age, and the repelling efficacy of the solid animal repellent was confirmed through feed intake. The rabbits are widely used in the field of animal experiments for non-rodents, so they were published as test animals.

Healthy individuals with a weight range of 2.0 to 2.5 Kg were randomly selected (3 each) (n = 9) and divided into three groups (control, Example 1, Example 2) in the test, and a stainless steel mesh breeding box (W550 × L680). XH405mm). After a week of purification, the experiment was conducted, and feed and negative water were freely fed.

In order to confirm the repellent effect of the wild animal repellents carried out in Examples 1 and 2, the compositions of Examples 1 and 2 (30 × 30 × 40 mm) were installed one in each of the breeding box feeders of Examples 1 and 2 groups. It was not installed in the control group. After feeding and drinking water, rabbit intake and behavior were observed for 14 days.

2. Test results

In the rabbits of Examples 1 and 2, the approach and retreat of the feeder, the squat phenomenon, sneezing and screaming phenomenon in the corner were observed, and no unusual behavior was observed in the control group.

As shown in Table 3, the daily feed intake for the rabbits of Examples 1 and 2 during the test period was 43.9% and 58.5%, respectively, decreased.

In addition, the daily feed intake of the composition of Example 2 was reduced by 33.1% compared to the composition of Example 1, confirming that the repelling efficacy of the composition of Example 2 was more excellent.

(g) 0 days 7 days 14 days Daily feed intake Control 156.2 ± 18.4 167.9 ± 10.5 157.2 ± 12.8 165.8 ± 6.6 Example 1 87.6 ± 5.5 91.9 ± 8.7 82.1 ± 2.7 92.9 ± 14.9 Example 2 75.1 ± 3.9 73.1 ± 6.2 61.2 ± 3.3 68.8 ± 9.9

[Experimental Example 4] Evasion efficacy of solid animal repellent in beagle dogs

1. Experimental method

The animal used in the test was a beagle dog of 5 months of age, and the repelling efficacy of the solid animal repellent was confirmed through feed intake. Since the beagle dog is widely used in the field of animal testing, it was disclosed as a test animal.

Healthy individuals ranging in weight from 8 to 10 Kg were randomly selected (3 each) (n = 9) and divided into three groups (control, Example 1, Example 2) in the test, and made of stainless steel mesh breeding box (W800 × L900 × H750mm). After a week of purification, the experiment was conducted, and feed and negative water were freely fed.

In order to confirm the repelling effect of the wild animal repellents carried out in Examples 1 and 2, the compositions of Examples 1 and 2 (30 × 30 × 40 mm) were installed one in each of the breeding box feeders of Examples 1 and 2 groups. It was not installed in the control group. After feeding and drinking water, feed intake and behavior of beagle dogs were observed for 14 days.

2. Test results

In the beagle dogs of Examples 1 and 2, hesitation of feed intake, repetitive movements of approaching and retreating of the feeder, sneezing and turning were observed, and no unusual behavior was observed in the control group.

As shown in Table 4, the daily feed intake for the beagle dogs of Examples 1 and 2 during the test period was 41.6% and 45.7%, respectively, compared to the control group.

In addition, the daily feed intake of the composition of Example 2 was reduced by 9.9% compared to the composition of Example 1, and it was confirmed that the repelling efficacy of the composition of Example 2 was more excellent.

(g) 0 days 7 days 14 days Daily feed intake Control 327.8 ± 27.1 372.5 ± 13.5 382.1 ± 21.5 352.9 ± 31.6 Example 1 192.1 ± 8.9 215.2 ± 17.6 212.5 ± 12.7  206.2 ± 17.4 Example 2 182.1 ± 11.2 201.8 ± 10.8 205.6 ± 13.5 191.5 ± 17.3

As described above, according to the present invention, both large-scale harmful wild animals such as wild boar, elk, roe deer, and small harmful wild animals such as raccoons, blue-green wool, and rats can exhibit repelling efficacy.

In addition, the present invention incorporates a repellent material having a repellent effect on ceramics, and uses a coating agent to minimize the release of the repellent material, thereby stabilizing the repelling efficacy of harmful wild animals even in a severely changing climate (heavy rain, heavy heat and dry weather). And the period can be extended.

Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, the scope of rights of the present invention is not limited thereto, and various modifications and improvements of those skilled in the art using the basic concept of the present invention defined in the following claims are also provided. It belongs to the scope of rights.

Claims (9)

Oregano essential oil 0.05 ~ 10% by weight, thyme essential oil 0.1 ~ 20% by weight, clove essential oil 0.2 ~ 30% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.02 ~ 10% by weight, indole 0.05 ~ 10% by weight, tea tree essential oil 0.2 ~ 20% by weight, eucalyptus essential oil 0.2 to 20% by weight, 0.2 to 20% by weight of cinnamon essential oil, 50 to 93% by weight of curing agent, 2 to 10% by weight of ceramic, 0.2 to 1% by weight of coating agent, and 1 to 10% by weight of emulsifier,
The coating agent is a repellent composition of harmful wild animals, characterized in that any one of silica sol, inorganic binder, nano-composite resin is used. According to claim 1,
The curing agent is a repellent composition of harmful wild animals, characterized by using a soap base. According to claim 1,
The ceramic has a diameter of 0.1 to 10 mm, and a repellent composition for harmful wild animals, characterized in that a water content of 1 to 10% is used. delete According to claim 1,
The emulsifier is a repellent composition of harmful wild animals, characterized in that using a sorbitan fatty acid ester. According to claim 1,
The emulsifier is characterized in that the use of any one or two or more mixtures selected from the group consisting of sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monostearate and sorbitan monobehenate. Repellent composition of harmful wild animals. Oregano essential oil 0.05 ~ 10% by weight, thyme essential oil 0.1 ~ 20% by weight, clove essential oil 0.2 ~ 30% by weight, creosote essential oil 0.02 ~ 10% by weight, indole 0.05 ~ 10% by weight, tea tree essential oil 0.2 ~ 20% by weight, eucalyptus essential oil Preparing a repellent for harmful animals in which 0.2 to 20% by weight and 0.2 to 20% by weight of cinnamon essential oil are mixed;
Coating the repellent with a coating agent of any one of silica sol, inorganic binder, and nanocomposite resin after impregnating the ceramic;
Adding and mixing an emulsifier sorbitan fatty acid ester and a curing agent soap base to the coated ceramic; And
After mixing the soap base, molding in a molding machine;
The coating agent, emulsifier, curing agent, and ceramic are 0.2 to 1% by weight, 1 to 10% by weight, 50 to 93% by weight, and 2 to 10% by weight of the total weight of the total repellent, respectively.
The ceramic has a diameter of 0.1 to 10 mm, a water content of 1 to 10% is used,
The molding is a method for preparing a repellent composition for harmful wild animals, which is performed by applying a rotational speed of 5 to 50 rpm at a temperature of 50 to 90 ° C in a molding machine. delete delete

Images