KR101562530B1

KR101562530B1 - System, method and computer program for learning process assessment to enhance public education

Info

Publication number: KR101562530B1
Application number: KR1020150076015A
Authority: KR
Inventors: 소재구
Original assignee: 소재구
Priority date: 2015-05-29
Filing date: 2015-05-29
Publication date: 2015-10-23

Abstract

The learning process evaluation system includes an evaluation table generation unit configured to receive selection information on a subset of evaluation items including at least one of a plurality of evaluation items preset from the teacher terminal and generate an evaluation table based on the selection information; An evaluation result receiving unit configured to receive an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the learner terminal using the evaluation table; And a learning pattern calculating unit configured to calculate a learning pattern of the learner using the evaluation result received by the evaluation result receiving unit. By using the above-mentioned learning process evaluation system, it is possible to achieve correct personality education by reflecting motivation and process as important evaluation items, and it is possible to expect the improvement of the learner's thinking ability by learning based on the thinking ability, The grades can be shown to be the same as their actual skills, and it is possible to solve the social problem of the high expenditure of private education expenses and activate the public education.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a learning process evaluation system, a method, and a computer program for activating public education.

Embodiments relate to a learning process evaluation system, a method, and a computer program. More specifically, the present invention evaluates not only learning results but also learning motives and processes in a multi-faceted manner, thereby eliminating the side effects of private education due to conventional quantitative learning, It is about online learning evaluation technology that can activate public education by promoting learning.

The learning evaluation that has been done in the past has a form in which the contents are taught in schools and the learning results are quantitatively evaluated in the form of scores or the like. However, grades expressed in the form of points can not escape the test, so there may be a gap between actual learning ability. In addition, the curriculum emphasizes the importance of effort, but there is no process in the evaluation process for learning to help or evaluate the effort. This type of education-oriented education may cause students who are not yet mature to form a false personality that values only the results. Also, as a result of concentrating too much on the results, there is a problem that students are left with anxiety that they can not compete with the public education alone.

On the other hand, as the information communication technology through the Internet has rapidly developed, the education methods that have conventionally been conducted in the face of students and teachers in the classroom have been diversified into various forms such as online video lectures. However, even in the case of the online learning system, the evaluation of the learning result still does not deviate from the conventional quantitative evaluation method which places importance on the result only.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-0078411

According to one aspect of the present invention, (i) a learning result and learning process as well as a learning result of the contents of a school can be evaluated in multiple aspects, (ii) a grade improvement with a skill can be expected, (iii) (Iv) can induce correct character formation through evaluation of motivation and process of learning, and (v) as a result, sufficient learning through public education alone A learning process evaluation system and method, and a computer program therefor, which can solve the present problem in which private education is prevalent.

The learning process evaluation system according to an embodiment receives selection information on a subset of evaluation items including at least one of a plurality of evaluation items previously set from a teacher terminal, and based on the selection information, An evaluation table generation unit configured to generate the evaluation table; An evaluation result receiving unit configured to receive an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the learner terminal using the evaluation table; And a learning pattern calculating unit configured to calculate a learning pattern of the learner using the evaluation result received by the evaluation result receiving unit.

The learning process evaluation system according to an embodiment further includes a learning schedule management unit configured to receive learning schedule information associated with one or more learning subjects from the learner terminal. At this time, the selection information includes selection information for a subset of evaluation items determined corresponding to each learning subject.

The learning process evaluation system according to an embodiment further includes a learning schedule management unit configured to receive learning schedule information including one or more learning events that are associated with one or more learning subjects from the learner terminal and are time-designated. At this time, the evaluation result receiving unit is configured to generate the evaluation table further using the time information of the learning event.

In one embodiment, the evaluation result receiving unit is further configured to receive an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the teacher terminal.

The learning process evaluation system according to an embodiment further includes a pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit configured to generate evaluation information on a learning pattern of the learner using the evaluation table and the calculated learning pattern. At this time, the evaluation information on the learning pattern includes information on the evaluation item showing a relatively low learning result.

In one embodiment, the evaluation table generation unit may modify the evaluation table based on the evaluation information generated by the pattern-by-pattern evaluation and generation unit, and use at least one of the learner terminal or the teacher terminal And to receive an evaluation result for each evaluation item of the modified evaluation table.

In one embodiment, the predetermined plurality of evaluation items include at least one higher evaluation item and at least one lower evaluation item corresponding to each higher evaluation item. At this time, the evaluation table generation unit may be further configured to generate an initial evaluation table using the higher evaluation item, and modify the evaluation table using the lower evaluation item when the evaluation table is modified based on the evaluation information.

The learning process evaluation method according to one embodiment can be performed using the learning process evaluation system according to the above-described embodiments.

A learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment includes: receiving selection information on a subset of evaluation items including at least one of a plurality of evaluation items previously set from a teacher terminal; Receiving an evaluation result for each evaluation item from a learner terminal using an evaluation table generated based on the selection information; And calculating a learning pattern of the learner using the received evaluation result.

The learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment further includes receiving learning schedule information associated with one or more learning subjects from the learner terminal before receiving the selection information. At this time, the selection information includes selection information for a subset of evaluation items determined corresponding to each learning subject.

The learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment further includes receiving learning schedule information including one or more learning events associated with one or more learning subjects and time-lagged from the learner terminal before receiving the selection information . At this time, in the step of receiving the evaluation result, the evaluation table is generated by further using time information of the learning event.

In one embodiment, the step of receiving the evaluation result includes a step of receiving an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the teacher terminal.

The learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment further includes generating evaluation information on a learning pattern of a learner using the evaluation table and the calculated learning pattern. At this time, the evaluation information on the learning pattern includes information on the evaluation item showing a relatively low learning result.

The learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment includes: modifying the evaluation table based on the evaluation information generated; And receiving an evaluation result for each evaluation item of the modified evaluation table from at least one of the learner terminal or the teacher terminal using the modified evaluation table.

In one embodiment, the predetermined plurality of evaluation items include at least one higher evaluation item and at least one lower evaluation item corresponding to each higher evaluation item. In this case, the step of receiving the evaluation result includes a step of receiving the evaluation result using the evaluation table generated using the higher evaluation item. Further, the step of modifying the evaluation table includes a step of modifying the evaluation table using the lower evaluation item.

A computer program according to one embodiment is for execution of the above-described learning process evaluation method in combination with hardware, and may be stored in a computer-readable medium.

According to the learning process evaluation system, method, and computer program according to one aspect of the present invention, it is possible to improve the erroneous conventional education and personality formation process in which motivation and process are important regardless of the result, By reflecting, we can attain correct personality education naturally.

In addition, the evaluation which considers only the conventional result leads to the memorization exercise and eventually causes the weakening of the learner's thinking ability. However, according to one aspect of the present invention, since the motivation and the process of learning are evaluated, And it can be expected that the learner can improve his / her thinking ability.

Furthermore, learning based on the thinking power naturally leads to self-directed learning, and as a result, it naturally leads to the improvement of learning ability which is the same as the actual performance.

Thus, the learning ability of the learner can be improved so that the learner 's academic achievement is the same as the actual ability of the learner, thereby solving the social problem of high expenditure of private education and activating the public education.

1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a learning process evaluation system according to an embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing each step of a learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing each step of a learning process evaluation method according to another embodiment.
4 is a flowchart showing each step of a learning process evaluation method according to another embodiment.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

The learning process evaluation system and method according to the embodiments can be applied to a conventional learning method that focuses only on the amount of knowledge, that is, to improve quantitative course learning activities and to enable qualitative subject learning activities focused on self reflection Can play a role. Conventional quantitative curricular activities inevitably forced a lot of study, the public education was neglected and private education was widespread, and massive private education costs burdened the domestic economy. The learning process evaluation system and method according to the embodiments are intended to solve the above-mentioned side effects and to perform the function of inducing the study method to be changed by the qualitative activity based on the thinking ability by applying the new evaluation method and criteria do.

In order to achieve such qualitative curricular activities, concrete techniques are needed to allow students to self-study to learn autonomously the contents of the lessons learned at school, and to evaluate them in the form of learning motivation and learning process. The learning process evaluation system and method according to the embodiments are configured to introduce contents that can evaluate and objectively evaluate the learning motive and the learning process to the items of the evaluation table for evaluating the learning.

In addition, for self-directed learning of students, there must be a tool that enables teachers, parents, or students themselves to check the contents of their self-study at anytime and anywhere. The learning process evaluation system according to the embodiments is a system in which a teacher, a parent, or a student accesses a terminal using a mobile phone or a computer to acquire necessary information so that students can check their self-learning contents without being bound by time and place It can play a role of providing.

That is, the learning process evaluation system according to the embodiments can function as a tool for confirming the learning result. By utilizing the above-mentioned learning process evaluation system, it is possible to cultivate an effective learning technique in which students can study on their own, and the ability of students to study easily, fun and happily. The ability to study on their own can be improved by systematically and consistently training effective learning skills, rather than being fundamentally driven, including (1) learning skills that can capture the entire contents of a story 2) classroom hours, 3) learning techniques to recognize points that explain important things, 3) learning skills to understand and summarize key content, and 4) questions to ask key questions (5) learning techniques with self-control to suppress learning impulsive minds in the course of study, and the like.

The learning process evaluation system and method according to the embodiments can appropriately configure the evaluation table presented to the learner with reference to the learner's learning schedule, the choice of the teacher, and the evaluation result of the previous learning, Training can be done naturally. By appropriately structuring the assessment tables so that students can carry out the learning methods themselves that combine what they have learned at school with their own thoughts, and by registering the learning outcomes through the evaluation tables in the system, students will be provided with a fair and objective assessment You can train the right personality that emphasizes effort, not just the results.

1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a learning process evaluation system according to an embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 1, the learning process evaluation system 1 according to the present embodiment includes an evaluation table generation unit 11, an evaluation result reception unit 12, and a learning pattern calculation unit 13. In one embodiment, the learning process evaluation system 1 may further include a pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit 14. [ Also, in one embodiment, the learning process evaluation system 1 may further include a learning schedule management unit 10.

The learning process evaluation system 1 according to the embodiments can be entirely hardware, or partly hardware, and partly software. For example, the learning process evaluation system 1 and each of the units 10-14 included therein may collectively refer to a device for sending and receiving data of a specific format and contents through an electronic communication method and software related thereto. The terms "part", "module", "server", "system", "device" or "terminal" in this specification and the like refer to a combination of hardware and software . For example, the hardware may be a data processing device comprising a CPU or other processor. Also, the software driven by the hardware may refer to a running process, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and the like.

Each of the parts 10-14 constituting the learning process evaluation system 1 according to the embodiments is not necessarily intended to refer to a separate component that is physically separated. 1, the learning schedule management unit 10, the evaluation table generating unit 11, the evaluation result receiving unit 12, the learning pattern calculating unit 13, and the pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit 14 are shown as separate blocks separated from each other , Which is merely a functional separation of the devices constituting the learning process evaluation system 1 by the operations performed by the corresponding devices. Therefore, depending on the embodiment, some or all of the learning schedule managing unit 10, the evaluation table generating unit 11, the evaluation result receiving unit 12, the learning pattern calculating unit 13, and the pattern- And can be integrated in one device. Alternatively, one or more of the learning schedule managing unit 10, the evaluation table generating unit 11, the evaluation result receiving unit 12, the learning pattern calculating unit 13, and the pattern-based evaluation generating unit 14 may be physically For example, the learning schedule managing unit 10, the evaluation table generating unit 11, the evaluation result receiving unit 12, the learning pattern calculating unit 13, and the pattern-by-pattern evaluating and generating unit 14 may be distributed Or may be components communicatively coupled to one another in a computing environment.

The learning process evaluation system 1 according to embodiments may operate in communication with one or more learner terminals 21-23 via a wired and / or wireless network. In addition, the course evaluation system 1 may further communicate and operate with one or more teacher terminals 31-33 via a wired and / or wireless network. The learner terminal 21-23 refers to a device used by a learner who inputs a learning result to the learning process evaluation system 1 and wants to receive evaluation of the learning result, for example, a student at each school. In addition, the teacher terminals 31-33 refer to a device used by a teacher who performs a teacher evaluation on the learning results input by the learner, for example, a teacher of each school.

The learner terminal 21-23 and the teacher terminals 31-33 may be a mobile terminal such as a smartphone, a personal computer, a notebook computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a tablet , A set-top box for Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), and the like, or any other computing device. Although three learner terminals 21-23 and teacher terminals 31-33 are shown in Fig. 1, these are merely illustrative, and the actual number of terminals capable of operating in association with the learning course evaluation system 1 It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.

The communication method between the learning course evaluation system 1 and the learner terminal 21-23 and the teacher terminals 31-33 can include all communication methods that can be networked by objects and objects, , 3G, 4G, or otherwise. For example, the learning process evaluation system 1 may include a wireless LAN (Local Area Network), a MAN (Metropolitan Area Network), a GSM (Global System for Mobile Network), an EDGE (Enhanced Data GSM Environment), a HSDPA Access, W-CDMA, CDMA, TDMA, Bluetooth, Zigbee, Wi-Fi, VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol), LTE Advanced, IEEE 802.16m, WirelessMAN-Advanced, HSPA +, 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE), Mobile WiMAX (IEEE 802.16e), UMB , one or more communication methods selected from the group consisting of iBurst and MBWA (IEEE 802.20) systems, HIPERMAN, Beam-Division Multiple Access (BDMA), World Interoperability for Microwave Access However, the present invention is not limited thereto.

In one embodiment, the learning management system 1 is implemented in the form of a web server or a group of web servers and accessed by the learner terminal 21-23 or teacher terminals 31-33, A learning evaluation web page can be provided that can implement a learning process evaluation method. The learner and the teacher access the learning evaluation web page by using a web browser or other type of application running on each terminal, thereby inputting the evaluation results to the learning process evaluation system 1 or the evaluation results And evaluation based on the learning pattern and the pattern calculated in the learning course evaluation system 1 based on the evaluation results.

Also, in one embodiment, the learning process evaluation system 1 may include an on-line lecture that can be downloaded over a network or provide lectures in the form of video that can be received in a streaming manner May be implemented as part of the system. For example, the on-line lecture system may be for classes of each school. Also, the online lecture may be a live lecture lecture in which bidirectional query response is possible. In such a case, the learner who takes the online lecture and the lecturer who provides the online lecture may be configured to input the evaluation result of the learning related to the online lecture into the lecture evaluation system (1).

The learning schedule management unit 1 is a unit for receiving, generating and / or modifying the learning schedule information of each learner. The learning schedule information may be assigned to one or more learning subjects. The learning schedule information may include one or more learning events. Here, the learning event refers to a schedule in which a specific time is specified using one or more of year, month, day, hour, and minute for an operation to be performed by the learner in relation to the learning. For example, the learning event may include, but is not limited to, an online lecture attendance time for each learning subject, a predetermined review time and / or a preparation time, and a test time. The learning schedule may be received by the learning schedule management unit 1 by the learner using the learner terminal 21-23. Alternatively, when the learning process evaluation system 1 is implemented as part of the online lecture system, the learning schedule may be automatically generated using the lecture details of the lectures taken by the learner.

The evaluation-table generating unit 11 is a unit for generating an evaluation table including evaluation items for self-evaluation of a learner or evaluation by a teacher. In one embodiment, the evaluation-table generating unit 11 receives from the teacher terminal 31-33 selection information in which a teacher selects one or more evaluation items among a plurality of evaluation items set in advance, and generates an evaluation table based on the selection information do. For example, the teacher can select the evaluation item so that an evaluation table specific to the learner is generated for each learner considering the characteristics of each learner. In addition, the teacher may select the evaluation item so that the evaluation table specific to the learning subject is generated for each learning subject, taking into consideration the characteristic of each learning subject the learner learns. The teacher may specify an evaluation item for each of the learning subjects, or may designate an evaluation item only for the learning subjects that the corresponding learner learns by referring to the learning schedule of the learner managed by the learning schedule management unit (10).

In addition, in one embodiment, the evaluation table generating unit 11 may be configured to evaluate the content of evaluation for the previous learning pattern generated by the pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit 14, or a predetermined learning among the learning schedules registered in the learning schedule management unit 1. [ An evaluation table may be generated based on an event. This will be described later in detail with reference to FIG. 3 and FIG.

The evaluation result receiving unit 12 receives the evaluation results of the evaluation items of the evaluation table from the learner terminal 21-23 and / or the teacher terminals 31-33 using the evaluation table generated by the evaluation table generating unit 11 Receiving section. For example, the evaluation result may include an evaluation score given on a predetermined basis for each evaluation item. The learner and / or the teacher can access the learning course evaluation system 1 by using his / her terminal to view the evaluation list and input his / her evaluation score into the evaluation list. The evaluation table may include a plurality of evaluation tables subdivided by each learning subject or by different criteria, and the learner and the teacher can input their evaluation results in the form of points in each evaluation table. The criterion for calculating the evaluation score may be presented by the evaluation result receiving unit 12, or may be designated by a learner or a teacher.

The learning pattern calculating unit 13 is configured to calculate a learning pattern of each learner using the evaluation result received by the evaluation result receiving unit 12. [ For example, the learning pattern calculating unit 13 can calculate the learning pattern so that the learner shows the evaluation items that are weak. The learning pattern calculating unit 13 calculates a learning pattern such that the learning result of the learner indicates that the learner's learning is poor based on the date, Can be calculated. In addition, the learning pattern calculating unit 13 may calculate a time point at which the learning of the learner is considered to be poor (for example, a test A day, etc.). The learning pattern calculated by the learning pattern calculating unit 13 can be transmitted to the learner terminal 21-23 and / or the teacher terminal 31-33.

The pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit 14 generates a pattern-by-pattern evaluation of the learner's learning pattern using the learning pattern calculated by the learning pattern calculating unit 13. [ For example, each evaluation item constituting the evaluation table may be associated with a specific learning field, and the pattern-specific evaluation generating unit 14 may generate information for improving a learner's learning pattern based on evaluation items that the learner appears to be weak Can be presented as part of a pattern-by-pattern evaluation. To this end, the per-pattern evaluation generating unit 14 may store related information such as a learning method for enhancing the learning ability of the evaluation item in association with each evaluation item. However, this is an example, and the pattern-by-pattern evaluation may include any information capable of helping the learner's learning using the above-described learning pattern with respect to the learning pattern calculating unit 13, and is not limited to the above. Similar to the learning pattern, the pattern-by-pattern evaluation generated by the pattern-based evaluation generating unit 14 can also be transmitted to the learner terminal 21-23 and / or the teacher terminal 31-33.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing each step of a learning process evaluation method according to an embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 2, a learner can input a learning schedule into the learning process evaluation system 1 using the learner terminal 2 (S1). However, in another embodiment, the learning process evaluation system 1 receives a learning schedule previously input into the on-line lecture system from a separate on-line lecture system, or the learning process evaluation system 1 does not refer to the learning schedule May be configured to perform a learning assessment, in which case the step S1 may be omitted.

Although the learner terminal 2 and the teacher terminal 3 are shown as one block for convenience of explanation in FIG. 2, there may be a plurality of learners and a plurality of teachers using the learning process evaluation system 1, It will be easily understood by a person skilled in the art that a plurality of learner terminals and a plurality of teacher terminals can be respectively provided.

The teacher can specify an evaluation item for generating an evaluation table and an evaluation score for each evaluation item using the teacher terminal 3 (S12). The teacher browses a plurality of evaluation items stored in advance in the learning process evaluation system 1 and selects the selection information that selects a subset of evaluation items including one or more evaluation items of the evaluation items from the learning process evaluation system 1 ). When there are a plurality of learners, the teacher may designate an evaluation item and an evaluation score for each learner considering characteristics of the learner. Further, when a learner learns a plurality of learning subjects, the teacher may designate evaluation items and evaluation scores appropriate for evaluating the learning of the subject in each learning subject.

The learning process evaluation system 1 generates an evaluation table using the selection information received from the teacher terminal 3 (S13). That is, an evaluation table specific to the learner and / or the learning subject is generated using the evaluation items and the evaluation scores selected by the teacher for each learner and / or for each learning subject of the learner. Each evaluation item of the evaluation table is set as indicators that can fairly objectify the learning process and the learning motive, without relying on the conventional quantitative evaluation method of evaluating the learning result only as the amount of knowledge. In particular, since the evaluation table for each learner and / or each learning subject can be different depending on the teacher's selection, it is possible to solve the side effects of the conventional evaluation method which has been mass- Based on qualitative curriculum activities, can lead to different ways of studying the learner.

The following Tables 1 to 10 show the respective parts of an example evaluation table for achieving the objects as described above.

Table 1 corresponds to the heading of the evaluation table. It includes the student, evaluation date, evaluation items, and summary. Here, the evaluation items may be set differently for each learner and / or each learning subject of the learner by the teacher as described above.

student date Check the evaluation items 1 week by class, 2 by class, 3 by class, check / review training, grasp core contents, grasp the whole contents, read intensive English, improve mathematical thinking, personality training, customs review, weekend review, , Two weeks before exam preparation Overall Total score: / point

Table 2 shows the curriculum between the student and the teacher, that is, the evaluation table for the school class. As shown, the evaluation items of the evaluation table are configured not to evaluate the amount of knowledge as in the past but to self-evaluate the qualitative items such as preparation for the class and the attitude of the class. In addition, the evaluation table may include the evaluation results of the teacher as well as the evaluation results of the student. Depending on the number of lessons for each subject taught on the day, a list of evaluation tables such as Table 2 may be presented to the learner and the teacher to input the evaluation results.

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Class 1 by subject Materials (textbook + notes + problem book)
Did you prepare and take classes? 10 points: textbook + notes + problem book
7 points: textbook + notes
5 points: Textbook
3 points: No substitute for anything else Attendance (perception) matters 10 points: 5 minutes ~ on time
8 to 9 points: 6 to 10 minutes
6 to 7 points: 11 to 15 minutes
5 points or less: more than 16 minutes
0 point: truancy
8 points: legal absence notice
Higher score:
Pre-noticed perception Teacher's comments
(Based on learning attitude) 10 points: Compliments
8 ~ 9 points: a little praise and effort
6 ~ 7 points: Plain writing and effort
5 points or less: Points to improve Teacher Comments Total points (30 points)

In addition, the evaluation table may not correspond only to a specific learning subject, but may correspond to a specific field of the skill required for learning. The following Tables 3 to 10 respectively show the learner's schedule, examination and review training, grasp the core contents and summarize the training notes, write the whole contents, prepare the training notes, concentrate on English reading, improve the mathematical thinking ability, Indicates the evaluation table corresponding to the habit correction. However, the field of the learning ability that can be evaluated through the evaluation table and the evaluation items for the evaluation are not limited to those described in the present specification, and the evaluation table may be constructed using different evaluation items depending on the content of the learning and the characteristics of the learner or the learning site It is possible.

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Schedule Management
Are you planning a learning time? 5 points: Write
0 point: Not written Specifically,
Was it written? 5 points: Subject + Unit Title + Subject +
Create up to page
4 points: subject + unit name + title
Only
3 points: Write only subject + unit name
1 ~ 2 points: Write only courses
0 point: Not written Does the progress check and feedback match? 3 ~ 5 points: Determination, determination, contents
1 ~ 2 points: The contents of the sentence
0 point: Not written Yesterday Yes / Did reviewing the "No" override alternatives in the review checklist prioritize scheduling? 5 points: Write
0 point: Not written Total points (20 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Preparation / Review
Check training "Yes" - Is the recalled word the recitation note? 4 points: More than 5 writing
3 points: Write more than 3
2 points: Write more than 1
1 point: Not completed "No" - Reasons for Failing and Overcoming
Is the alternative appropriate? 3 points: Excellent creativity of overcoming alternative
2 points: Creativity of coping alternative
1 point: Unclear (Except if not) I remember the 1 minute review words
Is it the word that you describe as important during class? 3 points: 5 or more
2 points: 3 or more
1 point: 1 or more
0 point: Not written Total score (10 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Identify key points and summarize summary training notes How many words do you remember? 4 points: More than 5 writing
3 points: Write more than 3
2 points: Write more than 1
1 point: Not completed Were you writing a good link in writing the concept? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: None How many problem solving questions do you have? 4 points: 5 or more
3 points: 3 or more
2 points: 1 or more
1 point: None Is the content that you consider important consistent with your goals and the teacher's important comments in class? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: Not completed Is it consistent with what you planned to do in your schedule? 4 points: Match.
0 point: Inconsistent. Total score (20 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Create a full content grasp training note How many have you guessed? 5 points: Write more than 5
4 points: 4 creations
3 points: 3 writing
2 points: 2 writing
1 point: 1 creation
0 point: Not written Is the problem confirmed? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
0 ~ 1 point: insufficient Have you properly identified what you do not know? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
0 ~ 1 point: insufficient Is the question appropriate for the content you do not know, the learning objectives, subheadings, or important content? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
1 point: insufficient
0 point: Not written Total points (20 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks English intensive
Read training
How many words or idioms do you not know? 4 points: 0
3 points: 3 or less
2 points: 5 or less
1 point: more than 5 points Is it appropriate to make sentences in everyday life using words or idioms that you do not know (to memorize)? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
0 ~ 1 point: insufficient Did you interpret it as American-style thinking? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
0 ~ 1 point: insufficient How many percent of the works were written? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
0 ~ 1 point: insufficient The degree of speed of reading (fluency)? 4 points to 5 points: Excellent
2 to 3 points: Normal
0 ~ 1 point: insufficient Total points (20 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Mathematical Thinking Skills Did you identify the problem correctly? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: Not completed Did you understand the concept of the problem? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: Not completed Understand the process of problem solving
Did you do it? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: Not completed Was the problem selection (difficulty level) appropriate? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: Did you think of the 4 step process by the troubleshooting process? 4 points: Excellent
3 points: Normal
2 points: insufficient
1 point: No Total points (20 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Personality training Are positive affirmations of making good feelings appropriate? 8 to 10 points: Excellent
5 to 7 points: Normal
1 to 2 points: insufficient
0 point: Can not create Do they use negative language use as positive language? 8 to 10 points: Excellent
5 to 7 points: Normal
1 to 2 points: insufficient
0 point: Can not create Did you find something to thank for a very small job? 8 to 10 points: Excellent
5 to 7 points: Normal
1 to 2 points: insufficient
0 point: Can not create Total points (30 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Habit proofing Did you follow the daily behavior guidelines for your habitual goals and write your testimonials appropriately? 8 to 10 points: Excellent
5 to 7 points: Normal
1 to 2 points: insufficient
0 point: Can not create Total points (10 points)

The learner can input the result of self-evaluation of his / her learning contents into the learning process evaluation system 1 (S14) by using the evaluation table as illustrated in Tables 2 to 10 above. That is, the learner is presented with the evaluation table by accessing the learning process evaluation system 1 by using the learner terminal 2, and inputs the self evaluation result of the learning contents in the score form according to the evaluation criteria constituting the comment column of the evaluation table can do.

Also, in one embodiment, the teacher may also input the evaluation result of the learner's learning contents to the learning process evaluation system 1 using the evaluation table (S15). For example, the learner and the teacher may be, but not limited to, the students and the teachers of the respective schools.

As described above, in the embodiments of the present invention, the items to be evaluated through the evaluation table are not intended to quantitatively measure the amount of knowledge as in the prior art, but may be classified into qualitative items . Therefore, by using the above-mentioned evaluation table, students can evaluate their efforts in the process of executing the study fairly and objectively, and furthermore, the evaluation of the learning motivation and the learning process can lead to the formation of the right personality of the students.

After the evaluation result is inputted, the learning process evaluation system 1 can calculate the learning pattern of the learner using the input evaluation result (S16). In addition, the learning process evaluation system 1 may generate a pattern-by-pattern evaluation including information for improving learning of the learner based on the calculated learning pattern (S17).

For example, the learning pattern includes an evaluation item indicating that the learner is vulnerable, and the evaluation by pattern may include information such as a learning method for improving the vulnerability. As described above with reference to Tables 2 to 10, each evaluation item of the evaluation table includes a schedule management, a preparation and a review, a core contents grasp and a summary summary, an entire contents grasp, an intensive reading of English, an improvement of mathematical thinking ability, And may be related to a specific field of learning ability. If the result of the learner 's learning pattern calculation shows that the learner is weak in a specific field, information on the improvement plan suitable for promoting learning in the field can be presented as a pattern - based evaluation.

Alternatively, the learning pattern includes a date, a day of the week, a time, and the like, which indicates that the learning of the learner is poor based on the input date, day, time, etc. of the evaluation result of the learner. And may include information for improving the sluggishness. For example, if a learner produces a learning pattern that is poorly learned every Thursday, information suggesting that a scheduled learning schedule be adjusted or reviewed on Thursday to improve poor learning on every Thursday may be presented as a patterned assessment . This information is transmitted to the learning schedule management unit 10 (FIG. 1) from the pattern-based evaluation generating unit 14 (FIG. 1) of the learning process evaluation system 1 so that the learning schedule can be considered Or may be presented to the learner terminal 2.

The learning pattern and / or pattern-based evaluation thus generated may be provided to the learner terminal 2 and the teacher terminal 3, respectively (S18 and S19). For example, the learner and the teacher can browse the learning pattern and / or the pattern-based evaluation by accessing the learning-process evaluation system 1. Alternatively, the learning process evaluation system 1 may send a learning pattern and / or a pattern-based evaluation to a text message such as an e-mail, a Short Message Service or a Multimedia Message Service, To the learner terminal 2 and the teacher terminal 3 in a push notification or other different form.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing each step of a learning process evaluation method according to another embodiment. The steps S11 to S19 of the learning process evaluation method shown in FIG. 3 are respectively identical to the steps S11 to S19 having the same reference numerals in the above-described embodiment with reference to FIG. 2, and thus detailed description is omitted in order to avoid duplication of description .

Referring to FIG. 3, in the learning process evaluation method according to the present embodiment, after the learning pattern and the pattern-by-pattern evaluation are generated, the learning process evaluation system 1 can modify the evaluation table based on the pattern-by-pattern evaluation (S20).

As described above with reference to steps S16 and S17 in Fig. 2, the learning pattern and the pattern-by-pattern evaluation may include information on the evaluation item that the learner appears to be vulnerable among various evaluation items related to learning. At this time, the learning process evaluation system (1) can modify the evaluation table so as to reinforce or refine evaluation items in which the learner appears to be weak. The evaluation items in the evaluation table can be related to a specific field of learning ability, and the learning process evaluation system (1) can modify the evaluation table so as to increase the number of evaluation items in the field in which learning appears to be weak. To this end, in one embodiment, an evaluation item associated with each field of learning ability has a step-wise configuration including one or more higher-level evaluation items and one or more lower-level evaluation items corresponding to each higher-level evaluation item. The learning process evaluation system 1 constructs the evaluation table by using only the upper evaluation items in the step of generating the evaluation table for the first time (S13), and if the learning result shows that the learner shows weakness to the evaluation items in a specific field, (S20), a new evaluation table can be constructed using the lower evaluation items of the weak field.

For example, when constructing an assessment item for a habitual correction field as shown in Table 10, when creating the evaluation chart at the beginning, "Did you implement the daily behavior guidelines according to your habitual goals and write your comments appropriately?" The evaluation items of the habit correction field can be generated. Then, if it is determined that the evaluation result of the learner is not good in the field of learning pattern calculation and pattern-based evaluation result habit correction, the learning process evaluation system (1) evaluates the evaluation items in the habit correction field as " Is the setting and number appropriate? "," Was the testimonial of the habit goal described in detail in relation to the specific action, "and" Did the testimonies include a reflection or improvement plan to achieve the habitual goal? " .

At this time, there may be an evaluation item having the same content as the upper evaluation item among the lower evaluation items, and therefore, constructing the evaluation table using the lower evaluation items may have substantially the same effect as increasing the evaluation item. Also, the steps constituted by the evaluation items may be two or more stages. In other words, if the evaluation results for the evaluation items are not maintained well for a certain period of time after constructing the evaluation table using the lower evaluation items, the learning process evaluation system (1) And to modify the evaluation table again.

Alternatively, the evaluation item of the evaluation table may be associated with a class consisting of a specific date, a day, and a time, and the learning pattern and the pattern-based evaluation may include information indicating that the learning of the learner is poor on a specific date, day and time. At this time, the learning process evaluation system 1 may modify the evaluation table so as to increase the number of evaluation items for the class related to the date, day, and time when the learning appears to be weak.

For example, when constructing an evaluation item for a specific class, as shown in Table 2, when the evaluation table is first generated, "Have you prepared the class and participated in the class?" And an evaluation item called "Attendance ". Thereafter, when it is determined that the evaluation result of the learner is not good on the day of the week in which the learning pattern is calculated and the pattern-by-pattern evaluation is performed, the learning process evaluation system (1) , "Did you confirm the class schedule in advance", "Have you focused only on class during class" and "Attendance".

Thereafter, the learner and / or the teacher can input the evaluation result using the modified evaluation table based on the pattern-by-pattern evaluation (S21, S22). At this time, unlike the evaluation table initially generated in step S13, the evaluation table is obtained by evaluating the learning ability of the learner so that the evaluation items related to the learning ability that the learner is vulnerable are reinforced or further subdivided. There is an advantage that the learning ability can be improved by grasping the vulnerable part more precisely and improving the vulnerability.

4 is a flowchart showing each step of a learning process evaluation method according to another embodiment. Since steps S31 to S39 of the learning process evaluation method shown in FIG. 4 are respectively identical to steps S11 to S19 of the above-described embodiment with reference to FIG. 2, detailed description thereof will be omitted to avoid duplication of description.

Referring to FIG. 4, the learning process evaluation method of the present embodiment is performed using an evaluation table generated by the method of the embodiment described above with reference to FIG. 2 at a normal time, and a temporal relationship with a learning event included in the learning schedule of the learner The learning process evaluation system 1 is configured to modify the evaluation table based on the learning event (S40). A learning event is a schedule in which a specific time is specified using one or more of year, month, day, hour, and minute for an action to be performed by the learner, such as a lecture time, a review time and / . In the present embodiment, when a learning relationship with a learning event arrives within a certain period of time or a time of a learning event has elapsed, the evaluation table is modified based on the learning event to maximize the learning effect through the learning event .

Table 11 below is an exemplary evaluation table generated based on a review that is time-based on the weekend as a learning event. When a predetermined time comes on the weekend through the learning schedule, the evaluation table for the review event is displayed on the learner and / Teachers can be presented.

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Weekend Review How does the content of the question fit with the lesson-specific questions? 8 to 10 points: Excellent
5 to 7 points: Normal
1 to 2 points: insufficient
0 point: Can not create Does the weekly plan have a specific range of learning? 5 points: Excellent
3 to 4 points: Normal
1 to 2 points: insufficient
0 point: Can not create Has the weekly study plan been written? 5 points: Write one week
3 ~ 4 points: Write more than 3 days
2 points: Write 2 days
1 point: Create one day
0 point: Not written Total points (20 points)

In addition, the following Tables 12 and 13 are exemplary evaluation tables that are generated based on the test whose date is specified as a learning event. If the current date is one week before and two weeks before the test, which is a learning event, an evaluation table for one week before the test and two weeks before the test may be presented to the learner and / or teacher as shown in Table 12 and Table 13.

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks 1 week before exams
learning
Have you participated in class by preparing questionnaires + summarizing notes? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent (each print etc.)
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 point: Not ready Did you check the correct answer in the note or post? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible If you have a wrong problem or a problem that is not correct, please answer the problem number X? Did you mark it? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Were you wrong or correct, but did you thoroughly supplement and supplement the problematic notes? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Is it consistent with what you planned to schedule? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Total points (20 points)

Evaluation Field Evaluation items Check your score Remarks Two weeks before the test
learning
Did you prepare a reference book and print materials to participate in the class? ~ 4 points: Excellent (each print etc.)
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 point: Not ready Did you fill out the main contents of the reference book or the contents of the print in the summary note and faithfully? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Can I fully explain and present the completion of the main points supplement? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Did the content of the planned lessons adequately plan the amount of study coverage? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Is it consistent with what you planned to schedule? 3 ~ 4 points: Excellent
2 points: Medium
1 point: insufficient
0 points: not possible Total points (20 points)

Thereafter, the learner and / or the teacher can input the evaluation result using the evaluation table based on the learning event (S41, S42). At this time, the evaluation table is generated by separately considering the learning events such as the class or the test, which the learner faces, unlike the evaluation table initially generated in step S33. Therefore, by using the modified evaluation table, it is possible to maximize the effect of the learning event by improving the learning ability by allowing the learner to take the test in a more prepared posture or by allowing the natural review by using the evaluation table after the lecture There is an advantage to be able to.

In the embodiment of FIG. 4, it is described that the evaluation table is modified based on the time of the learning event only after the calculation of the learning pattern and the evaluation by pattern are performed using the evaluation table generated for the first time. However, An evaluation table may be generated in consideration of the learning event from the step S33 of initially generating the evaluation table. Further, the generated evaluation table may be repeatedly modified as the time specified in each learning event comes or elapses.

The operations of the learning process evaluation system and / or method according to the embodiments described above can be at least partially implemented in a computer program and recorded in a computer-readable recording medium. In the recording medium according to the embodiments, a program for implementing an operation by a learning process evaluation system and / or method is recorded, and the recording medium may be any kind of recording device capable of storing data that can be read by a computer . For example, the computer-readable recording medium includes a ROM, a RAM, a CD-ROM, a magnetic tape, a floppy disk, an optical data storage device, and the like, and also includes a carrier wave (for example, And the like. The computer readable recording medium may also be distributed over a networked computer system so that computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed manner. In addition, functional programs, codes, and code segments for implementing the present embodiment may be easily understood by those skilled in the art to which this embodiment belongs.

While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. However, it should be understood that such modifications are within the technical scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the true scope of the present invention should be determined by the technical idea of the appended claims.

Claims

An evaluation table generation unit configured to receive selection information on a subset of evaluation items including at least one of a plurality of evaluation items preset from a teacher terminal and generate an evaluation table based on the selection information;
An evaluation result receiving unit configured to receive an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the learner terminal using the evaluation table;
A learning pattern calculating unit configured to calculate a learning pattern of the learner using the evaluation result received by the evaluation result receiving unit; And
And a pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit configured to generate evaluation information on the learning pattern of the learner using the evaluation table and the calculated learning pattern,
Wherein the evaluation information on the learning pattern includes information on an evaluation item that shows a relatively low learning result as compared with a learning result of another evaluation item,
Wherein the predetermined plurality of evaluation items include at least one higher evaluation item and at least one lower evaluation item corresponding to each higher evaluation item,
The evaluation-
Generate an initial evaluation table using the higher evaluation item;
After the evaluation information for the learning pattern is generated by the pattern-by-pattern evaluation generating unit using the evaluation result received using the first evaluation table, an evaluation indicating the relatively low learning result based on the evaluation information Correcting the evaluation table using at least one of the lower evaluation items corresponding to the item;
And to receive another evaluation result for each evaluation item of the revised evaluation table from at least one of the learner terminal or the teacher terminal using the revised evaluation table.

The method according to claim 1,
Further comprising a learning schedule management unit configured to receive learning schedule information associated with one or more learning subjects from the learner terminal,
Wherein the selection information includes selection information for a subset of the evaluation items determined corresponding to each learning subject.

The method according to claim 1,
Further comprising a learning schedule management unit configured to receive learning schedule information including at least one learning event that is associated with one or more learning subjects from the learner terminal and whose time is designated,
And the evaluation result receiving unit is configured to generate the evaluation table by further using time information of the learning event.

The method according to claim 1,
And the evaluation result receiving unit is further configured to receive an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the teacher terminal.

delete

As a learning process evaluation method,
The learning process evaluation system comprising: receiving selection information on a subset of evaluation items including at least one of a plurality of evaluation items preset from a teacher terminal;
The learning process evaluation system comprising the steps of: receiving an evaluation result for each evaluation item from a learner terminal using an evaluation table generated based on the selection information;
The learning process evaluation system comprising the steps of: calculating a learning pattern of a learner using the received evaluation result;
Wherein the learning process evaluation system comprises the steps of: generating evaluation information on a learning pattern of a learner using the evaluation table and the calculated learning pattern;
The learning process evaluation system modifying the evaluation table based on the evaluation information generated; And
Wherein the learning process evaluation system includes receiving another evaluation result for each evaluation item of the modified evaluation table from at least one of the learner terminal or the teacher terminal using the modified evaluation table,
Wherein the evaluation information on the learning pattern includes information on an evaluation item that shows a relatively low learning result as compared with a learning result of another evaluation item,
Wherein the predetermined plurality of evaluation items include at least one higher evaluation item and at least one lower evaluation item corresponding to each higher evaluation item,
The step of receiving the evaluation result for each evaluation item includes a step of receiving the evaluation result using the evaluation table generated using the higher evaluation item,
The step of modifying the evaluation table may further include a step of generating evaluation information for the learning pattern by using one or more of the lower evaluation items corresponding to the evaluation item indicating the relatively low learning result on the basis of the evaluation information And modifying the evaluation table.

9. The method of claim 8,
Further comprising receiving learning schedule information associated with one or more learning subjects from the learner terminal before receiving the selection information,
Wherein the selection information includes selection information for a subset of evaluation items determined corresponding to each learning subject.

9. The method of claim 8,
Further comprising receiving learning schedule information from the learner terminal, the learning schedule information including one or more learning events associated with one or more learning subjects and time-lagged prior to receiving the selection information,
Wherein the evaluation table is generated by further using time information of the learning event in the step of receiving the evaluation result.

9. The method of claim 8,
And the step of receiving the evaluation result includes receiving an evaluation result for each evaluation item from the teacher terminal.

delete

A computer program stored in a medium coupled with hardware to perform a learning evaluation method,
In the learning evaluation method,
Receiving selection information for a subset of evaluation items including at least one of a plurality of evaluation items preset from a teacher terminal;
Receiving an evaluation result for each evaluation item from a learner terminal using an evaluation table generated based on the selection information;
Calculating a learning pattern of a learner using the received evaluation result;
Generating evaluation information on a learning pattern of a learner using the evaluation table and the calculated learning pattern;
Modifying the evaluation table based on the evaluation information generated; And
And receiving another evaluation result for each evaluation item of the modified evaluation table from at least one of the learner terminal or the teacher terminal using the modified evaluation table,
Wherein the evaluation information on the learning pattern includes information on an evaluation item that shows a relatively low learning result as compared with a learning result of another evaluation item,
Wherein the predetermined plurality of evaluation items include at least one higher evaluation item and at least one lower evaluation item corresponding to each higher evaluation item,
The step of receiving the evaluation result for each evaluation item includes a step of receiving the evaluation result using the evaluation table generated using the higher evaluation item,
The step of modifying the evaluation table may further include a step of generating evaluation information for the learning pattern by using one or more of the lower evaluation items corresponding to the evaluation item indicating the relatively low learning result on the basis of the evaluation information And modifying the evaluation table.