JPWO2020044477A1 - Abnormality diagnostic system, method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

Provided are an abnormality diagnosis system, a method and a program capable of accurately diagnosing the type of abnormality cause to be diagnosed. When the data output from the diagnosis target is input, the diagnostic unit generates preprocessed data in which noise is attenuated, which is a characteristic part other than the characteristic part that makes it possible to identify the type of abnormality cause from the data. A diagnostic model having a processing unit and an abnormality cause identification unit that identifies the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a diagnosis model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when preprocessed data is input. Is a machine learning model, and the learning unit is a diagnostic model learning unit that generates a diagnostic model by machine learning, and noise that generates attenuated data in which the above noise is removed from the learning data for machine learning of the diagnostic model. The learning data has an attenuated portion, and the learning data is simulated data simulating an abnormality of a diagnosis target or actual data indicating an abnormality of a diagnosis target, and the diagnostic model learning unit uses the attenuated data as training data and causes an abnormality. A diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the type as teacher data.

Description

Embodiments of the present invention relate to anomaly diagnostic systems, methods and programs.

Machine learning such as neural networks is used to identify the causes of abnormalities such as breakdowns and accidents of equipment or equipment that supports social infrastructure such as electric power equipment. In order to build a classifier using machine learning, it is generally necessary to learn a large amount of abnormal data, but failures and accidents of equipment and devices in social infrastructure rarely occur, and the actual number of abnormal data. Is few. Furthermore, such equipment and devices are installed in various environments, and the data obtained from each equipment and equipment is affected by noise peculiar to each environment, but abnormal data covering all environments is provided. It's difficult to prepare.

For diagnosis by machine learning under a situation where the number of data is limited, a technique is known in which learning is performed using a large number of normal data and a small number of abnormal data to distinguish between normal and abnormal. For example, learning is performed using a small number of data when the object surface is frozen and a large number of data when the object surface is not frozen, and whether or not the object surface is frozen is identified.

However, with the above technique, it is possible to discriminate between two states, normal and abnormal, based on a large number of normal data, but it is not possible to discriminate the type of abnormal data with a small number of data. That is, it is not possible to identify the type of the cause of the abnormality to be diagnosed indicated by the abnormality data.

JP-A-2017-125809

As a measure to identify the type of abnormal data, simulated data that imitates a failure is prepared in advance by simulation or desktop experiment, and after learning the simulated data to build a classifier, the classifier actually fails. A method of identifying the data and confirming the identification accuracy can be considered.

However, the environment in which the equipment or equipment is installed cannot be completely reproduced by simulation or desktop experiment, and the simulated data and the actual data may have different characteristics such as noise. In this case, with the classifier trained only with the simulated data, although the simulated data can be correctly identified, there arises a problem that the actual data cannot be correctly identified. In addition, if noise peculiar to simulated data or actual data is included and the data is biased, it is erroneously learned that the noise is a feature indicating the cause of abnormality, and the identification accuracy deteriorates. was there.

An embodiment of the present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an abnormality diagnosis system, method and program capable of accurately diagnosing the type of abnormality cause to be diagnosed. And.

In order to achieve the above object, the abnormality diagnosis system of the present embodiment is an abnormality diagnosis system that diagnoses an abnormality cause of a diagnosis target, and is a diagnostic unit that identifies the type of the abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a model. And a learning unit that generates the model by machine learning, and the diagnosis unit makes it possible to identify the type of the cause of the abnormality from the data when the data output from the diagnosis target is input. Based on a data processing unit that generates preprocessed data in which noise is attenuated, which is a feature part other than the part, and a diagnostic model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input. It has an abnormality cause identification unit that identifies the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target, the diagnosis model is a machine learning model, and the learning unit includes a diagnosis model learning unit that generates the diagnosis model by machine learning. The learning data includes a noise damping unit that generates attenuated data in which the noise is attenuated from the training data for machine learning of the diagnostic model, and the training data is a simulation that simulates an abnormality of the diagnosis target. It is data or actual data indicating an abnormality of the diagnosis target, and the diagnostic model learning unit is characterized in that the diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data. And.

Further, this embodiment can be regarded as a method of realizing the processing of each part by a computer or an electronic circuit, or a program for realizing the processing of each part by a computer.

That is, the abnormality diagnosis method of the present embodiment is an abnormality diagnosis method for diagnosing an abnormality cause of a diagnosis target, a diagnosis step for identifying the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a model, and machine learning of the model. The diagnostic step is a feature portion other than the feature portion that makes it possible to identify the type of the cause of the abnormality from the data when the data output from the diagnosis target is input. Based on a data processing step that generates preprocessed data with noise attenuation and a diagnostic model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input, the abnormality cause of the diagnosis target It has an abnormality cause identification step for identifying a type, the diagnostic model is a machine learning model, and the learning step includes a diagnostic model learning step for generating the diagnostic model by machine learning and machine learning for the diagnostic model. The training data includes simulated data simulating the abnormality of the diagnosis target or the abnormality of the diagnosis target, and has a noise attenuation step of generating the attenuated data in which the noise is attenuated from the training data for the above. The diagnostic model learning step is characterized in that the diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as training data.

The abnormality diagnosis program of the present embodiment is an abnormality diagnosis program for diagnosing an abnormality cause of a diagnosis target, and a computer is provided with a diagnosis step for identifying the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a model, and the model is machined. When the data output from the diagnosis target is input, the learning step generated by the learning is executed, and the diagnosis step is a feature portion other than the feature portion that makes it possible to identify the type of the abnormality cause from the data. Based on a data processing step that generates preprocessed data in which noise is attenuated, and a diagnostic model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input, the abnormality of the diagnosis target. It has an abnormality cause identification step for identifying the type of cause, the diagnostic model is a machine learning model, and the learning step includes a diagnostic model learning step for generating the diagnostic model by machine learning and the diagnostic model of the diagnostic model. It has a noise attenuation step of generating attenuated data in which the noise is attenuated from learning data for machine learning, and the learning data is simulated data simulating an abnormality of the diagnosis target or the diagnosis target. The diagnostic model learning step is characterized in that the diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data.

It is a figure which shows the structure of the abnormality diagnosis system which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the data acquired by a data acquisition part. This is an example of a table of learning data held in the learning data storage unit. It is a schematic diagram of the neural network of the data conversion part. It is a schematic diagram of the neural network of the data identification part. It is a schematic diagram of the neural network when the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification part is a neural network. It is operation flowchart which shows an example of operation of an abnormality diagnosis system. It is a schematic diagram of the neural network of the data conversion part and the data identification part at the time of learning. It is a figure which shows the display example of the diagnosis result of the display part in 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structure of the abnormality diagnosis system which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which a display control part displays on a display part. It is operation flowchart which shows an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part which concerns on the modification 1 of the 2nd Embodiment displays on a display part. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part which concerns on the modification 2 of the 2nd Embodiment displays on a display part. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part which concerns on the modification 3 of the 2nd Embodiment displays on a display part. It is a schematic diagram of the neural network of the data conversion part, the data identification part and the abnormality cause identification part at the time of learning. It is operation flowchart which shows an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system of this embodiment based on 1st Embodiment. It is operation flowchart which shows an example of operation of the abnormality diagnosis system of this embodiment based on 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure for demonstrating the operation of the 3rd Embodiment. It is an operation flowchart which shows an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system which concerns on 4th Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part displays on the display part in 5th Embodiment. It is an operation flowchart which shows an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system which concerns on 5th Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structure of the abnormality diagnosis system which concerns on 7th Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part displays on the display part in 7th Embodiment. It is an operation flowchart which shows an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 of 7th Embodiment. It is an operation flowchart which shows an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 which concerns on the modification of 7th Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part which concerns on the modification 1 of 7th Embodiment displays on a display part. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which the display control part which concerns on the modification 2 of the 7th Embodiment displays on a display part.

[First Embodiment]
(Outline configuration)
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an abnormality diagnosis system according to the first embodiment. The abnormality diagnosis system 1 constructs a machine learning model, and diagnoses the cause of abnormality of the equipment or device to be diagnosed (hereinafter, also simply referred to as “diagnosis target”) by the machine learning model. The diagnosis target is, for example, equipment or equipment used in an electric power system, and the abnormality diagnosis system 1 is used in an electric power system monitoring system or the like. As shown in FIG. 1, a data acquisition unit 100 and a learning data storage unit 200 are connected to the abnormality diagnosis system 1.

The data acquisition unit 100 acquires the data diagnosed by the abnormality diagnosis system 1 (hereinafter, also simply referred to as “diagnosis target data”). The diagnosis target data is data measured when an abnormality occurs in the diagnosis target. Examples of the abnormality to be diagnosed include a failure of the diagnosis target and a defect due to an accident. The diagnosis target data is, for example, waveform data as shown in FIG. However, the data to be diagnosed is not limited to waveform data, but may be image data.

The learning data storage unit 200 stores learning data used for learning of the abnormality diagnosis system 1. The learning data are actual data of abnormalities of the actual diagnosis target in the past and simulated data imitating the abnormalities of the diagnosis target.

In the learning data storage unit 200, the actual data of the abnormality of the actual diagnosis target in the past and the simulated data imitating the abnormality of the diagnosis target are, for each data, the information indicating the abnormality cause type and the actual data or the simulation. Information indicating the data type of data is added and stored. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the actual data at the time of the actual equipment failure in the past (“actual failure data” in the figure) and the simulated data simulating the failure by simulation or desktop experiment are added to each data. Information indicating the cause type and information indicating the data type are associated with each other. The actual data stored in the learning data storage unit 200 is data indicating an abnormality of the diagnosis target measured in the past. In FIG. 3, there are two types of failure causes, failures A and B, but there may be three or more types.

The training data may include noise peculiar to simulated data or actual data. This noise is a part where the abnormality cause type is not reflected. That is, since the simulated data or the actual data is data indicating any of the abnormality cause types, it has a feature portion that enables the abnormality cause type to be identified and a noise portion that is the other feature portion. This noise portion is a feature portion other than the feature portion that makes it possible to identify the abnormality cause type. For example, the simulated data or the actual data is used as waveform data as shown in FIG. 3, and the abnormality cause type can be identified. If the characteristic part has a mountain shape of the waveform, it is the offset value of the waveform. The noise peculiar to the actual data is, for example, the noise that reflects the environment in which the diagnosis target is installed, and the noise peculiar to the simulated data is, for example, the noise that reflects the experimental environment such as a desk experiment.

The abnormality diagnosis system 1 includes a single computer or a plurality of computers and display devices connected to a network. The abnormality diagnosis system 1 stores programs and databases in storage such as HDD and SSD, appropriately expands them in memory such as RAM, and processes them with a CPU to construct a machine learning model and perform data conversion, which will be described later. Perform the necessary operations.

Specifically, the abnormality diagnosis system 1 includes a processing unit 2, a storage unit 3, an input unit 4, and a display unit 5. The storage unit 3 includes a memory or a storage, and stores an operation program, a calculation result, and the like of the processing unit 2. The input unit 4 is an input interface by a user, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, or a touch panel. The display unit 5 displays the calculation result of the processing unit 2. The display unit 5 is, for example, a display device such as an organic EL or a liquid crystal display.

The processing unit 2 includes a CPU and performs various operations described later. Specifically, the processing unit 2 has a diagnosis unit 21, a learning unit 22, and a display control unit 23.

The diagnosis unit 21 includes a CPU and identifies the type of abnormality cause to be diagnosed based on the model. The learning unit 22 generates the above model by machine learning.

Specifically, the diagnosis unit 21 has a data processing unit 211 and an abnormality cause identification unit 212. The data processing unit 211 includes a CPU, and when the diagnosis target data is input, the data processing unit 211 generates preprocessed data in which noise is attenuated from the data. That is, the data processing unit 211 acquires the diagnosis target data from the data acquisition unit 100 and converts the diagnosis target data based on the noise attenuation model described later to generate the preprocessed data. The noise referred to here refers to a characteristic portion of the data to be diagnosed other than the characteristic portion that makes it possible to identify the cause of the abnormality. For example, if the diagnosis target data is the waveform data as shown in FIG. 2, and the feature portion that enables the identification of the abnormality cause type is the shape of a mountain of the waveform, it is the offset value of the waveform.

The abnormality cause identification unit 212 identifies the type of the abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on the diagnosis model which is configured to include the CPU and outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input. The diagnostic model is a machine learning model, and for example, a neural network, a decision tree, a random forest, an SVM (support vector machine), or the like can be used. FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of the neural network when the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 is a neural network. As shown in FIG. 6, the abnormality cause identification unit 212 inputs the preprocessed data output from the data processing unit 211, and outputs the abnormality cause type.

The learning unit 22 includes a CPU, and includes a noise attenuation unit 221, a noise attenuation model generation unit 222, and a diagnostic model learning unit 223.

The noise damping unit 221 is configured to include a CPU, and generates attenuated data in which noise is removed from learning data for machine learning of a diagnostic model. This learning data is learning data acquired from the learning data storage unit 200. The noise referred to here refers to a characteristic portion of the learning data other than the characteristic portion that makes it possible to identify the cause of the abnormality. For example, if the learning data is waveform data as shown in FIG. 3, and the feature portion that enables the identification of the abnormality cause type is the shape of a mountain of the waveform, it is the offset value of the waveform.

More specifically, the noise attenuation unit 221 generates attenuated data from the input data based on a noise attenuation model that attenuates noise. This noise attenuation model is used not only in the noise attenuation unit 221 in the learning stage for generating the diagnostic model, but also in the diagnostic unit 21 in the diagnostic stage. That is, the data processing unit 211 attenuates noise from the input diagnostic target data and generates preprocessed data based on the noise attenuation model.

The noise attenuation model generation unit 222 includes a CPU and generates a noise attenuation model used in the noise attenuation unit 221. The noise attenuation model generation unit 222 includes a data conversion unit 222a, a data identification unit 222b, a conversion model learning unit 222c, and an identification model learning unit 222d.

The data conversion unit 222a is configured to include a CPU, converts the learning data based on the conversion model for converting the learning data, and outputs the converted data. This learning data is learning data acquired from the learning data storage unit 200. The transformation model here is a neural network. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a. This neural network is, for example, an autoencoder.

The data identification unit 222b is configured to include a CPU, and is a data type indicating whether the training data is simulated data or actual data based on an identification model that identifies the data type of the training data by inputting the converted data. To identify. The discriminative model here is a neural network. FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b. The data identification unit 222b acquires the converted data from the data conversion unit 222a, and uses this neural network to identify whether the learning data that is the source of the converted data is simulated data or actual data.

The discriminative model learning unit 222d is configured to include a CPU, and generates a discriminative model by machine learning. That is, the discriminative model learning unit 222d generates a discriminative model so that the discriminative model is a model that correctly discriminates the data type of the training data from the converted data. Specifically, the identification model is generated by updating the model of the data identification unit 222b so that the error between the output result of the data identification unit 222b and the data type of the learning data to be the teacher data becomes small.

The conversion model learning unit 222c includes a CPU and generates a noise attenuation model by machine learning. That is, a noise attenuation model is generated by updating the conversion model of the data conversion unit 222a by machine learning. Specifically, the conversion model learning unit 222c generates a noise attenuation model that is similar to the learning data but outputs the converted data so that the data identification unit 222b cannot correctly identify the data. More specifically, the conversion model learning unit 222c reduces the error between the training data and the converted data and the error between the output result of the data identification unit 222b and the incorrect data type in the conversion model. By updating to, a noise attenuation model is generated. The data type that is an incorrect answer is a data type in which the data type of the learning data corresponding to the output result of the data identification unit 222b is inverted.

The diagnostic model learning unit 223 is configured to include a CPU and generates a diagnostic model by machine learning. That is, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 generates a diagnostic model by a machine learning model using the attenuated data output from the noise damping unit 221 as learning data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data. The abnormality cause type used as the teacher data is the abnormality cause type of the learning data (input) corresponding to the attenuated data (output). Further, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 may update the diagnostic model once constructed by using new teacher data.

The display control unit 23 includes a CPU and causes the display unit 5 to display the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 (diagnosis model).

(Detailed configuration)
The processing of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 will be described in detail according to the flowchart. FIG. 7 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1.

As shown in FIG. 7, first, the conversion model learning unit 222c and the identification model learning unit 222d train the neural networks of the data conversion unit 222a and the data identification unit 222b (step S01).

That is, as shown in FIG. 8, the network is configured so that the output of the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a becomes the input of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b. The data conversion unit 222a acquires learning data from the learning data storage unit 200, converts the data, and outputs the converted data. Then, the data identification unit 222b acquires the converted data from the data conversion unit 222a and identifies the data type. The identification model learning unit 222d acquires the output result of the data identification unit 222b and the data type of the learning data input to the data conversion unit 222a, which is the source of the output result as teacher data, and performs an error back propagation method. The weight of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b is updated by using the above, and the conversion model learning unit 222c acquires the converted data from the data conversion unit 222a and the training data from the training data storage unit 200 as teacher data. , The weight of the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a is updated by using the error back propagation method in consideration of the output result of the data identification unit 222b.

More specifically, the identification model learning unit 222d has two classes in which the neural network of the data identification unit 222b has the output data of the data conversion unit 222a as an input variable and the data type indicating whether it is simulated data or actual data as an output variable. Train as a classifier. For example, the k data type (0 or 1), one-hot representation of true label indicating a data type and _{t k} (i.e., only the index to be correct label 1, others are set to _0), data _{y D1k} When the output value of the kth output node by the identification unit 222b is used, the identification model learning unit 222d calculates the equation (1) indicating the cross entropy error as a loss function, and uses the error backpropagation method to calculate the data identification unit. An identification model is generated by updating the weights of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b so that the output y _d1k of 222b approaches the correct answer label t _k.

At the same time, the conversion model learning unit 222c inputs the learning data acquired from the training data storage unit 200 into the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a, and is similar to the input data, but the data identification unit 222b determines the data type. A noise attenuation model is generated by training as a data converter that converts input data and outputs it so that it cannot be identified correctly.

That is, the conversion model learning unit 222c constructs the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a based on the autoencoder. Specifically, the index data of the l, a u _l of l-th input data value, when the output value of the l-th data with the y _ael to the data conversion section 222a, using the formula (2) as a loss function The data conversion unit 222a and the noise attenuation unit 221 are constructed as an auto encoder and output a value similar to the input data.

Further, the conversion model learning unit 222c determines that the data type output by the data identification unit 222b is the correct answer so that the data identification unit 222b outputs data that cannot be correctly identified as simulated data or actual data. The training is performed so as to be inverted with the data type of the training data. That is, learning is performed so that the error between the data type output by the data identification unit 222b and the data type obtained by reversing the data type of the learning data that is the correct answer is improved.

Specifically, the conversion model learning unit 222c updates the conversion model of the data conversion unit 222a based on the equation (3) as a loss function _{so that the error E ae'of the equation (3) is improved.} , The noise attenuation model is generated by causing the data identification unit 222b to output data that is similar to the input data (learning data) and that cannot be correctly identified.

Incidentally, the weighting parameter a ₁ of Learning of formula (3) may be a constant, it may be determined by trial and error. Further, for example, when the identification accuracy of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b is high, the identification rate (correct answer rate) of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b and the equation (1) are used in order to greatly change the output of the data conversion unit 222a. It may be a mathematical expression with a loss function as a variable.

As described above, the learning unit 22 makes an error in the neural network of the data identification unit 222b based on the loss function of the equation (1) and the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a based on the loss function of the equation (3). The process of updating using the backpropagation method is repeated a certain number of times or until the loss function value does not improve, and the learning is completed. The neural network of the data conversion unit 222a may be pre-learned by using the equation (2) before learning by using the equation (3).

Next, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 trains the machine learning model (step S02). That is, the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 is learned as a multi-class classifier in which the converted data (damped data) of the data conversion unit 222a trained in step S01 is used as an input variable and the abnormality cause type is used as an output variable. By letting it generate a diagnostic model. For this learning, only simulated data is used from the learning data of the learning data storage unit 200. That is, the input variable to the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 is the data (damped data) obtained by converting the simulated data of the learning data storage unit 200 by the data conversion unit 222a after learning. Further, after learning only the simulated data, it is confirmed that the actual data can be correctly identified among the learning data of the learning data storage unit 200.

When using a neural network as a machine learning model, m is the anomaly cause type, v _m is the one-hot representation of the correct answer label indicating the anomaly cause type (only the index that is the correct answer label is 1 and the others are 0), y _{d2 m.} Is the output value of the m-th output node by the abnormality cause identification unit 212, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 calculates the equation (4) indicating the cross entropy error as a loss function, and uses the error backpropagation method to calculate the equation (4). The weight of the neural network is updated so that _{the output y d2 m} of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 approaches the correct answer label v m. The diagnostic model learning unit 223 repeats this update a certain number of times or until the loss function value does not improve, and completes the learning. This will generate a diagnostic model.

After that, the data processing unit 211 and the abnormality cause identification unit 212 diagnose the data to be diagnosed (step S03). That is, the data processing unit 211 acquires the diagnosis target data from the data acquisition unit 100, converts the acquired data by the noise attenuation model generated by the conversion model learning unit 222c, and converts the acquired data into preprocessed data as the abnormality cause identification unit 212. Output to. The abnormality cause identification unit 212 acquires preprocessed data from the data processing unit 211 and outputs the abnormality cause type.

The display control unit 23 acquires the abnormality cause type output by the abnormality cause identification unit 212, and displays the abnormality cause type as a diagnosis result on the display unit 5 as shown in FIG. 9 (step S04).

(Action / effect)
(1) The abnormality diagnosis system 1 of the present embodiment is an abnormality diagnosis system for diagnosing an abnormality cause of a diagnosis target, and a diagnosis unit 21 for identifying the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a model and a machine of the model. A learning unit 22 generated by learning is provided, and the diagnosis unit 21 is a feature portion other than the feature portion that makes it possible to identify the type of abnormality cause from the data when the data output from the diagnosis target is input. Based on the data processing unit 211 that generates preprocessed data with noise attenuation and the diagnostic model that outputs the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input, the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target is selected. It has an abnormality cause identification unit 212 for identifying, and the diagnostic model is a machine learning model. The learning unit 22 has a diagnostic model learning unit 223 that generates a diagnostic model by machine learning, and a diagnostic model for machine learning. It has a noise damping unit 221 that generates attenuated data from which the noise is removed from the training data, and the training data is simulated data that simulates the abnormality of the diagnosis target or actual data that indicates the abnormality of the diagnosis target. Therefore, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 uses the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data to generate a diagnostic model by machine learning.

As a result, the noise damping unit 221 generates a diagnostic model by inputting the noise-damped attenuated data, which is a feature part other than the feature part that makes it possible to identify the type of the cause of the abnormality, from the training data. , It is possible to accurately diagnose the type of abnormality caused by the diagnosis target. That is, since the simulated data and the actual data include a feature portion that makes it possible to identify the cause type of the abnormality and a noise portion that is a feature other than the feature portion, the noise portion is attenuated by the noise damping unit 221. As a result, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 can generate a diagnostic model by learning the characteristic portions of the simulated data and the actual data that enable the machine learning model to identify the cause of the abnormality. Then, when identifying the abnormality cause type using the diagnostic model, the data processing unit 211 attenuates the noise portion that is a feature other than the feature component that enables the abnormality cause to be identified from the diagnosis target data, thereby causing the abnormality. A characteristic part that makes it possible to identify the type is left, and the abnormality cause identification unit 212 makes it easy to diagnose. As a result, it is possible to accurately diagnose the type of abnormality caused by the diagnosis target.

(2) The noise attenuation unit 221 generates attenuated data based on a noise attenuation model that removes noise from the input data, and the learning unit 22 has a noise attenuation model generation unit 222 that generates a noise attenuation model. I did. Then, the noise attenuation model generation unit 222 is input to the data conversion unit 222a that converts the training data and outputs the converted data based on the conversion model that converts the training data, and the converted data is input. Based on the identification model that identifies the data type of the training data, the data identification unit 222b that identifies the data type that indicates whether the training data is simulated data or actual data, and the conversion model are updated by machine learning for learning. It has a conversion model learning unit 222c that generates a noise attenuation model that outputs attenuated data when data is input, and an identification model learning unit 222d that updates the identification model by machine learning, and has an identification model and a conversion model. Is a neural network, the identification model learning unit 222d generates an identification model so that the identification model correctly identifies the data type of the training data from the converted data, and the conversion model learning unit 222c generates a conversion model. A noise attenuation model is generated by updating the model to output the converted data so that the data identification unit 222b cannot correctly identify the data, although it is similar to the training data, and the data processing unit 211 generates the conversion model. Based on the noise attenuation model generated by the learning unit 222c, the preprocessed data is generated from the data output from the diagnosis target.

As a result, the conversion model is similar to the training data, but the noise attenuation unit 221 is generated by updating the conversion model to output the converted data so that the data identification unit 222b cannot correctly identify the data. As a result, the noise peculiar to the simulated data or the actual data is attenuated or removed from the training data, and the data identification unit 222b converts the simulated data into intermediate data that cannot be distinguished from the actual data. For example, if the simulated data and the actual data contain noise peculiar to each, the data identification unit 222d can identify the data type by paying attention to the noise portion such as the offset in the above example. The noise attenuation model is updated by updating the conversion model so that the data identification unit 222b outputs the converted data (for example, the data having the same waveform but different offset values from the simulated data and the actual data) so that neither the simulated data nor the actual data can be identified. By generating the above, it is possible to obtain intermediate data in which noise peculiar to simulated data and actual data is attenuated or removed. That is, the characteristic part necessary for identifying the original abnormality cause type is left in the intermediate data.

Since the diagnostic model learning unit 223 trains the machine learning model to generate a diagnostic model using such intermediate data, it is possible to accurately identify the cause type of abnormality regardless of whether the original learning data is simulated data or actual data. At the same time, it is possible to accurately identify the cause of abnormality even for new data to be diagnosed.

(3) The conversion model learning unit 222c updates the conversion model so that the data type of the simulated data or the actual data output by the data identification unit 222b is inverted with the data type of the input data input to the data conversion unit 222a. I tried to do it.

This makes it possible to generate intermediate data that cannot be distinguished from actual data or simulated data. That is, if the conversion model learning unit 222c only trains the conversion model so as to improve the error between the input data and the output data (in the first term on the rightmost side of the equation (2) or the equation (3)). (Correspondence), the output data is only learned so as to approach the input data, but in the present embodiment, the data type of the output data of the conversion model is further input to the data conversion unit 222a by the conversion model learning unit 222c. Since the data type of the input data is trained to be the inverted data type (corresponding to the second term on the rightmost side of the equation (3)), the data output by the noise attenuation model is correctly corrected by the data identification unit 222b. It can be unidentifiable data. This makes it possible to generate intermediate data that cannot be distinguished from actual data or simulated data.

(4) A display control unit 23 for displaying the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 on the display unit is provided. As a result, the user can obtain the identification result of the cause of the abnormality displayed on the display unit 5, and can deal with the abnormality to be diagnosed.

(Second embodiment)
(Constitution)
The second embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. The second embodiment is the same as the basic configuration of the first embodiment. In the following, only the points different from those of the first embodiment will be described, and the same parts as those of the first embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a configuration of an abnormality diagnosis system according to a second embodiment. In the present embodiment, the input unit 4 accepts the input by the user of the parameters related to the learning of the learning unit 22. Parameters relating to the learning, the data conversion section 222a and a data discrimination unit 222b of the neural network, and the network structure of the machine learning model abnormality cause identifying unit 212, the number of times of learning, the formula (3) in the weight parameter a _1, etc. included be. The parameters related to this learning are used for learning in the learning unit 22.

As shown in FIG. 11, the display control unit 23 causes the display unit 5 to display the parameter reset button PR. The parameter reset button PR is a button for readjusting the parameters and executing learning by the learning unit 22.

Further, as shown in FIG. 11, the display control unit 23 is a noise attenuation model and a diagnostic model by learning the data conversion unit 222a by the learning unit 22, the neural network of the data identification unit 222b, and the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212. On the display unit 5, the type of abnormality cause of the training data, the correct answer rate for the training data by the diagnostic model, the data before and after the noise attenuation by the noise attenuation unit 221 and the data number of the data, or the diagnosis by the diagnostic model. Display the result. This correct answer rate can be calculated by (the number of diagnostic models that match the abnormality cause type indicated by the learning data / the number of learning data) x 100. Here, the processing unit 2 has a correct answer rate calculation unit 24 including a CPU, and the correct answer rate calculation unit 24 calculates the correct answer rate. In addition, this correct answer rate is also referred to as failure cause identification rate in this specification or drawing.

The diagnostic result based on the diagnostic model is also referred to as a determination result in the present specification or the drawings. Further, the noise-attenuated data is equal to the converted data of the data conversion unit 222a after learning by the conversion model learning unit 222c, and the data before noise attenuation is the data conversion unit 222a after learning by the conversion model learning unit 222c. Equal to the data before conversion, that is, the training data. Therefore, the data before and after noise attenuation by the noise attenuation unit 221 is also referred to as data before and after conversion of the data conversion unit 222a after learning (hereinafter, also simply referred to as “data before and after conversion”) in the present specification or drawings.

In order to display the above, the display control unit 23 receives the learning data from the learning data storage unit 200, the converted data from the data conversion unit 222a after learning, and the identification result from the abnormality cause identification unit 212 after learning. Acquire each type of abnormal cause.

Further, as shown in FIG. 11, the display control unit 23 causes the display unit 5 to display the left / right button LR and the abnormality diagnosis start button S. The left and right button LR switches the display of data before and after conversion. That is, when the button on the left side is pressed once, the data before and after the conversion whose data number is one smaller is displayed, and when the button on the right side is pressed once, the data before and after the conversion whose data number is one higher is displayed. The abnormality diagnosis start button S is a button for starting the identification of the abnormality cause type. The abnormality diagnosis start button S is a failure diagnosis start button S when the abnormality is a failure.

Each display on the display unit 5 by the display control unit 23 is performed before diagnosing the cause of the abnormality with respect to the data to be diagnosed.

FIG. 12 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 according to the second embodiment. The same operation as that of the first embodiment will be omitted as appropriate.

As shown in FIG. 12, first, the input of the parameters related to learning by the input unit 4 is accepted, and the parameters are set (step S11). After that, the learning unit 22 learns the neural networks of the data conversion unit 222a and the data identification unit 222b (step S01), and learns the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 (step S02).

After learning each neural network and machine learning model, the display control unit 23 causes the display unit 5 to display a confirmation screen (step S12). That is, the correct answer rate, the data before and after the conversion and its data number, the abnormality cause type of the learning data, and the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 are displayed. When the user confirms the display of the display unit 5 by pressing the left / right button LR or the like and resets the parameters (YES in step S13), the user presses the parameter reset button PR to return to step S11 and return to the parameter. If it is not necessary to reset the data (NO in step S13), the diagnosis target data is diagnosed by pressing the abnormality diagnosis start button S of the user (step S03), and the diagnosis result is displayed on the display unit 5 by the display control unit 23. (Step S04).

(Action / effect)
In the present embodiment, the display control unit 23 displays the learning data on the display unit 5 after learning the data conversion unit 222a and the abnormality cause identification unit 212 by the learning unit 22 and before diagnosing the abnormality cause of the diagnosis target. The correct answer rate of the model or the data before and after the conversion by the data conversion unit 222a is displayed.

As a result, the user can confirm the validity of the noise attenuation model and the diagnostic model before diagnosing the cause of the abnormality. For example, in the example of FIG. 11, in the waveform training data, the peak portion is a characteristic portion indicating an abnormality, and the waveform data before conversion is biased downward so that the signal strength is lowered as a whole. Assuming that noise is included, the waveform data after conversion has an overall signal strength increase and noise attenuation, leaving a peak portion of the feature portion, and the processing of the noise attenuation model is appropriate. It can be confirmed that it is a process.

As a modification 1, as shown in FIG. 13, the display control unit 23 includes the correct answer rate, the data number and the data before and after the conversion, the abnormality cause type of the learning data, and the individual data information including the identification result of the abnormality cause. May be displayed on the display unit 5 side by side for each of the simulated data and the actual data. As a result, the user can confirm the validity of the diagnostic model while comparing the validity of learning using simulated data with the validity of learning using actual data.

As a modification 2, as shown in FIG. 14, the display control unit 23 displays the correct answer rate and the individual data information on the display unit 5 side by side for each simulated data, each actual data, and each abnormality cause type. You may. As a result, the user can confirm the validity of the machine learning model by comparing the validity of learning using simulated data and the validity of learning using actual data for each abnormality cause type, and is more reliable. It is possible to perform a high degree of abnormality diagnosis.

As a modification 3, as shown in FIG. 15, the display control unit 23 causes the display unit 5 to display the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 and the data before and after the conversion by the data conversion unit 222a in step S04. You may do so. This makes it possible to confirm what kind of conversion is being performed by the data conversion unit 222a. That is, since the learning data of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 and the data that is the source of the learning data can be confirmed, the reliability of the diagnosis result can be verified by the user.

(Third Embodiment)
(Constitution)
A third embodiment will be described. The third embodiment is the same as the basic configuration of the first embodiment or the second embodiment. In the following, only the points different from those of the second embodiment will be described, and the same parts as those of the second embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

The machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 of the present embodiment is a neural network. The learning unit 22 simultaneously learns the neural networks of the data conversion unit 222a, the data identification unit 222b, and the abnormality cause identification unit 212. As shown in FIG. 16, the learning unit 22 configures the network so that the output of the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a becomes the input of the data identification unit 222b and the abnormality cause identification unit 212. Update the weights at the same time.

Specifically, the data conversion unit 222a acquires learning data from the learning data storage unit 200, performs data conversion, and outputs the converted data to the data identification unit 222b and the abnormality cause identification unit 212. Then, the data identification unit 222b identifies the data type of the converted data, and the abnormality cause identification unit 212 identifies the abnormality cause type from the converted data. The learning unit 22 receives the identification result of the data identification unit 222b and the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212, and updates the weights of the neural networks of the respective units 211, 212, and 23 by using the error back propagation method.

That is, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 uses the neural network of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 as the abnormality cause type that is the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 and the abnormality cause type of the learning data that is the source of the identification result. In addition to updating the data using the back-propagation method so that the error in Update using the backpropagation method so that the error between the original training data and the data type is improved.

More specifically, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 trains the neural network of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 using the equation (4) as the loss function, and the discrimination model learning unit 222d uses the equation (1) as the loss function. It is used to train the neural network of the data identification unit 222b. For the learning of the abnormality cause identification unit 212, it is possible to perform the learning using only the simulated data among the learning data of the learning data storage unit 200.

Further, the conversion model learning unit 222c resembles the input data in the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a, but the data identification unit 222b cannot correctly identify the data, and the abnormality cause identification unit 212 can correctly identify the data. The data conversion unit 222a is trained to output. That is, the conversion model learning unit 222c reads the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a with the error between the training data and the converted data of the data conversion unit 222a, the data type output by the data identification unit 222b, and the correct answer. Update so that the error between the data type of the data for which the data is reversed and the error cause type output by the error cause identification unit 212 and the error cause type of the learning data that is the correct answer are improved. ..

More specifically, the conversion model learning unit 222c repeats the process of updating using the error backpropagation method as a loss function based on the equation (5) a certain number of times or until the loss function value does not improve, and trains the unit. ..

_{The weight variables a 1} and a ₂ related to the learning of the equation (5) may be constants or may be determined by trial and error. For example, a ₁ is obtained from the neural network of the data identification unit 222b. In order to greatly change the output of the data conversion unit 222a when the identification accuracy is high, a mathematical formula may be used in which the loss function such as the identification rate (correct answer rate) of the neural network of the data identification unit 222b or the equation (1) is used as a variable. For the varying increase the output of the data converter 222a when the neural network identification accuracy of the abnormality cause identifying unit 212 for a ₂ is low, the identification rate of the neural network (percentage of correct answers) and loss function, such as equation (4) It may be a mathematical expression having.

FIG. 17 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 of the present embodiment based on the first embodiment. FIG. 18 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 of the present embodiment based on the second embodiment. The same operation as that of the first embodiment and the second embodiment will be omitted as appropriate.

In the operation of the present embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, instead of steps S01 and S02 of FIGS. 7 and 12, the learning unit 22 sets the neural network of each unit 222a, 222b, 212 as step S1a. Let them learn.

(Action / effect)
In the present embodiment, the conversion model learning unit 222c uses the conversion model to identify the error between the training data and the converted data, the error between the output result of the data identification unit 222b and the incorrect data type, and the identification of the cause of the abnormality. The noise attenuation model is generated by updating so that the error between the output result of the part 212 and the error cause type that is the correct answer becomes small.

As a result, it is possible to emphasize the characteristics necessary for identifying the cause of abnormality in the attenuated data of the noise attenuation unit 221, and it is possible to improve the accuracy of identifying the cause of abnormality even if the number of learning times is the same. In addition, the accuracy of identifying the cause of abnormality can be improved with a small number of learnings.

That is, as shown in FIG. 19, in the learning of the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a, the conversion model learning unit 222c outputs the error between the learning data and the converted data of the data conversion unit 222a, and the data identification unit 222b. Not only the error between the obtained data type and the data type in which the data type of the learning data that is the correct answer is reversed, but also the abnormality cause type output by the abnormality cause identification unit 212 and the abnormality cause type of the training data that is the correct answer. Since the error of the above is also improved, the neural network of the data conversion unit 222a is learned so that the output result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 is correct, so that the features necessary for identifying the abnormality cause are emphasized. The data can be output by the data conversion unit 222a, and as a result, the identification accuracy of the abnormality cause type can be improved or the learning speed can be improved.

(Fourth Embodiment)
(Constitution)
A fourth embodiment will be described. The fourth embodiment is the same as the basic configuration of the first embodiment, the second embodiment, or the third embodiment. Hereinafter, only the points different from those of the third embodiment will be described, and the same parts as those of the third embodiment will be designated by the same reference numerals and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

The learning unit 22 of the present embodiment generates two or more diagnostic models of the abnormality cause identification unit 212. For example, the diagnostic model of the first or second embodiment (hereinafter, also referred to as the first model) and the diagnostic model of the third embodiment (hereinafter, also referred to as the second model) are used by the respective methods. To generate each.

Further, the correct answer rate calculation unit 24 calculates the correct answer rate of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 based on the first model and the correct answer rate of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 based on the second model. As described above, this correct answer rate can be calculated by (the number of identification results of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 after learning match the abnormality cause type indicated by the learning data / the number of learning data) × 100.

The abnormality cause identification unit 212 receives the correct answer rate of each model from the correct answer rate calculation unit 24, and sets a model with good diagnostic accuracy from each model as its own diagnostic model. That is, the diagnostic model that maximizes the correct answer rate is adopted.

FIG. 20 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 according to the fourth embodiment. The same operations as those of the first, second, and third embodiments will be omitted as appropriate.

As shown in FIG. 20, first, the learning unit 22 trains the neural networks of the data conversion unit 222a and the data identification unit 222b (step S01), and trains the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 (step S02). .. Next, the learning unit 22 trains the neural networks of each unit 222a, 222b, and 223 (step S1a). In addition, steps S01 and S02 and step S1a may be performed in parallel at the same time.

Next, the correct answer rate calculation unit 24 calculates the correct answer rate of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 according to each machine learning model (step S21). The abnormality cause identification unit 212 acquires the correct answer rate of each diagnostic model from the correct answer rate calculation unit 24, selects the model with the maximum correct answer rate, and uses it as a diagnostic model for identifying the abnormality cause type (step S22). Then, the abnormality cause identification unit 212 diagnoses the diagnosis target data (step S03), and the display control unit 23 displays the diagnosis result on the display unit 5 (step S04).

(Action / effect)
In the present embodiment, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 generates two or more diagnostic models, and the diagnostic model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 is a model with good diagnostic accuracy from the two or more generated diagnostic models.

Thereby, the diagnostic accuracy can be improved. Which of the diagnostic model models of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 is superior depends on various parameters such as the number of learnings, and cannot be known without actual verification. Here, the correct answer rate calculation unit 24 and Since verification is performed by the abnormality cause identification unit 212, the diagnostic accuracy can be improved.

(Fifth Embodiment)
(Constitution)
A fifth embodiment will be described. The fifth embodiment is the same as the basic configuration of the fourth embodiment. Hereinafter, only the points different from those of the fourth embodiment will be described, and the same parts as those of the fourth embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 21, the display control unit 23 refers to the correct answer rate of the diagnostic model and the data before and after the attenuation of the noise attenuation unit 221 with respect to the diagnostic model generated by the diagnostic model learning unit 223. The data before and after the conversion) is displayed on the display unit 5. The display control unit 23 acquires the correct answer rate from, for example, the correct answer rate calculation unit 24. Further, the input unit 4 accepts the user's selection of the machine learning model displayed on the display unit 5. The display control unit 23 causes the display unit 5 to display the selection unit SL that accepts the selection.

FIG. 22 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 according to the fifth embodiment. The same operation as the fourth operation will be omitted as appropriate.

In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 22, instead of step S22 in FIG. 20, for each diagnostic model generated by the diagnostic model learning unit 223, the display control unit 23 sets the correct answer rate and the data before and after the conversion. Is displayed on the display unit 5 (step S31). Then, the input unit 4 accepts the user's selection of the diagnostic model (step S32), sets the diagnostic model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 as the selected diagnostic model, and diagnoses the diagnosis target data by the abnormality cause identification unit 212. (Step S03), the diagnosis result is displayed on the display unit 5 by the display control unit 23 (step S04).

(Action / effect)
In the present embodiment, the diagnostic model learning unit 223 generates two or more diagnostic models, and the display control unit 23 displays the display unit 5 with the correct answer rate of the diagnostic model and before and after the attenuation by the noise attenuation unit 221 for each diagnostic model. Changed to display the data. This allows the user to examine the validity of the diagnostic model. Then, a more valid diagnostic model can be adopted to diagnose the cause of the abnormality.

(Sixth Embodiment)
A sixth embodiment will be described. The sixth embodiment is the same as the basic configuration of any one of the first to fifth embodiments. In the following, only the points different from the fifth embodiment will be described, and the same parts as those in the fifth embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

The input unit 4 of this embodiment receives the input of hyperparameters used in the generation of the noise attenuation model in the conversion model learning unit 222c. This hyper parameter is a parameter of the neural network constituting the conversion model, where is the weighting parameter a ₁ of the formula (3) or Formula (5) used in converting the model learning unit 222c. The input unit 4 receives an input of the weighting parameter a ₁ depending on the data type of either the learning data is simulated data or actual data. Transformation model learning unit 222c sets the weighting parameter a ₁ input from the input unit 4 separately.

As described above, in the present embodiment, the conversion model learning unit 222c multiplies the hyperparameters received by the input unit 4 by the error between the output result of the data identification unit 222b and the teacher data which is the correct answer, and the noise attenuation model. Was generated.

Thereby, it is possible to adjust whether the converted data of the data conversion unit 222a has an output closer to the simulated data or the actual data. For example, when the actual data contains noise and the simulated data does not contain noise, the weight parameter for the actual data is set to 0 so that the data conversion unit 222a functions as a noise filter and includes noise. It is possible to prevent the data type from being identified by the data identification unit 222b that inputs the data after the actual data is converted by the data conversion unit 222a, and to prevent the noise from being erroneously learned. That is, it is not necessary to reflect the noise contained in the actual data in the learning of the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212. Therefore, the accuracy of identifying the cause of the abnormality can be improved.

Further, since the display control unit 23 causes the display unit 5 to display the data before and after the attenuation of the noise attenuation unit 221 (data before and after the conversion), it is necessary to visually confirm that the noise is removed from the data before and after the conversion. Therefore, it can be determined that the diagnostic model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 can be identified without being affected by noise, and the reliability of the diagnostic result can be improved.

(7th Embodiment)
(Constitution)
A seventh embodiment will be described. The seventh embodiment is the same as the basic configuration of the sixth embodiment. In the following, only the points different from those of the sixth embodiment will be described, and the same parts as those of the sixth embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

FIG. 23 is a diagram showing a configuration of an abnormality diagnosis system according to a seventh embodiment. The abnormality diagnosis system 1 of the present embodiment includes an adjusting unit 25. The adjusting unit 25 includes a CPU and adjusts hyperparameters used in generating a noise attenuation model. The conversion model learning unit 222c generates a noise attenuation model by updating the conversion model using the hyperparameters adjusted by the adjustment unit 25.

The display control unit 23 displays on the display unit 5 an adjustment reception image for receiving the adjustment of the adjustment unit 25, a correct answer rate of the diagnostic model, or an adjustment result including data before and after attenuation by the noise attenuation unit 221. It is displayed on the same display screen of the part 5. As shown in FIG. 24, the adjustment reception image is composed of, for example, a slide bar 51 and a knob 52 on the slide bar 51, and the user puts the knob 52 on the slide bar 51 via an input unit 4 such as a mouse. slide adjusts the weighting parameter a _1. When the position of the knob 52 and the x (0 ≦ x ≦ 1) , controller 25, x times the weight parameter a ₁ when the learning data is simulated data, when the learning data is actual data weighting parameter a ₁ is multiplied by (1-x).

FIG. 25 is an operation flowchart showing an example of the operation of the abnormality diagnosis system 1 according to the seventh embodiment. The same operation as that of the sixth embodiment will be omitted as appropriate.

As shown in FIG. 25, the adjustment unit 25 adjusts the weighting parameters _{a 1} (step S41). Learning unit 22, each unit using the weight parameters _{a 1} after adjustment 222a, train the neural network 222b (step S42), further, after completion of the learning, the converted data in the data conversion unit 222a after learning, That is, a diagnostic model is generated by learning the machine learning model of the abnormality cause identification unit 212 using the attenuated data of the noise attenuation unit 221 (step S43).

Then, the display control unit 23 displays the correct answer rate of the diagnostic model or the data before and after the attenuation of the noise attenuation unit 221 (according to the data conversion unit 222a) on the same display screen as the screen on which the adjustment reception screen of the display unit 5 is displayed. The adjustment result including the data before and after the conversion) is displayed (step S44).

Next, when the input unit 4 does not press the abnormality diagnosis start button S displayed on the display unit 5 (NO in step S45), that is, when the user determines that the adjustment result is not valid, the abnormality without starting a diagnosis, the process returns to step S41, adjusting the weighting parameter _{a 1.} On the other hand, when the input unit 4 presses the abnormality diagnosis start button S displayed on the display unit 5 (YES in step S45), that is, when the user determines that the adjustment result is appropriate, the abnormality diagnosis is started. Then, the abnormality cause identification unit 212 diagnoses the diagnosis target data (step S03), and the display control unit 23 displays the diagnosis result on the display unit 5 (step S04).

As shown in FIG. 26, instead of the steps S42 and S43 in FIG. 25, similarly to the third embodiment, the learning unit 22, each unit using the weight parameters _{a 1} after adjustment by the adjustment portion 25 222a The neural networks of 222b and 223 may be trained (step S45a).

(Action / effect)
Abnormality diagnosis system 1 of this embodiment includes a controller 25 for adjusting the weighting parameters a _1, transformation model learning unit 222c includes a diagnostic model by updating the conversion model using the weighting parameters a _1, which is adjusted I tried to generate it. Then, the display control unit 23 displays the adjustment reception image for receiving the adjustment of the adjustment unit 23, the correct answer rate of the diagnostic model, or the adjustment result including the data before and after the attenuation by the noise attenuation unit 221. Changed to display on the same display screen.

Accordingly, while viewing the adjustment result, users because it can adjust the weighting parameters a _1, thereby improving convenience. That is, complicated operations to adjust the screen for adjusting the weighting parameters a _1, a weighting parameter a ₁ by switching the display screen of the data before and after the adjustment result correct rate and an attenuation (data before and after conversion) You don't have to.

As a modification 1 of this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 27, the display control unit 23 has a correct answer rate, a data number, data before and after attenuation (data before and after conversion), an abnormality cause type of learning data, and an abnormality cause. Individual data information including the identification result may be arranged for each of the simulated data and the actual data and displayed on the display screen on which the adjustment reception image of the display unit 5 is displayed. As a result, the user can confirm the validity of the diagnostic model while comparing the validity of learning using simulated data with the validity of learning using actual data.

As a modification 2, as shown in FIG. 28, the display control unit 23 arranges the correct answer rate and the individual data information for each simulated data, each actual data, and each abnormality cause type, and the adjustment reception image of the display unit 5. May be displayed on the display screen where is displayed. As a result, the user can confirm the validity of the diagnostic model by comparing the validity of learning using simulated data and the validity of learning using actual data for each abnormality cause type, and the reliability is higher. Can perform high-level abnormality diagnosis.

(Other embodiments)
Although a plurality of embodiments according to the present invention have been described in the present specification, these embodiments are presented as examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The above-described embodiment can be implemented in various other forms, and various omissions, replacements, and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. These embodiments and modifications thereof are included in the scope and gist of the invention, as well as in the scope of the invention described in the claims and the equivalent scope thereof.

In the first to seventh embodiments, the abnormality diagnosis system 1 is provided with the display unit 5, but the display unit 5 does not necessarily have to be provided. For example, the abnormality diagnosis system 1 outputs the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit 212, the correct answer rate, the data before and after the conversion by the data conversion unit 222a, and the like in response to an external request, and displays them on an external display device. You may do so. Such an abnormality diagnosis system 1 is, for example, a server composed of a single server or a computer.

1 Abnormality diagnosis system 2 Processing unit 21 Diagnosis unit 211 Data processing unit 212 Abnormal cause identification unit 22 Learning unit 221 Noise attenuation unit 222 Noise attenuation model generation unit 222a Data conversion unit 222b Data identification unit 222c Conversion model learning unit 222d Identification model learning unit 223 Diagnostic model learning unit 23 Display control unit 24 Correct answer rate calculation unit 25 Adjustment unit 3 Storage unit 4 Input unit 5 Display unit 51 Slide bar 52 Knob 100 Data acquisition unit 200 Learning data storage unit

Claims (14)

An abnormality diagnosis system that diagnoses the cause of an abnormality to be diagnosed.
A diagnostic unit that identifies the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on the model,
A learning unit that generates the model by machine learning,
With
The diagnostic unit
When the data output from the diagnosis target is input, the data processing unit that generates preprocessed data in which noise, which is a feature part other than the feature part that makes it possible to identify the type of the cause of the abnormality from the data, is attenuated. When,
An abnormality cause identification unit that identifies the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a diagnosis model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input.
Have,
The diagnostic model is a machine learning model.
The learning unit
A diagnostic model learning unit that generates the diagnostic model by machine learning,
A noise attenuation unit that generates attenuated data in which the noise is attenuated from training data for machine learning of the diagnostic model.
Have,
The learning data is simulated data simulating the abnormality of the diagnosis target or actual data showing the abnormality of the diagnosis target.
The diagnostic model learning unit
The diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data.
Abnormality diagnosis system. The noise attenuation unit generates the attenuated data based on a noise attenuation model that removes the noise from the input data.
The learning unit
It has a noise attenuation model generator that generates the noise attenuation model.
The noise attenuation model generator
A data conversion unit that converts the learning data and outputs the converted data based on the conversion model that converts the learning data.
Based on the identification model that identifies the data type of the training data by inputting the converted data, a data identification unit that identifies the data type indicating whether the training data is the simulated data or the actual data. ,
A conversion model learning unit that generates a noise attenuation model that outputs the attenuated data when the training data is input by updating the conversion model by machine learning.
A discriminative model learning unit that updates the discriminative model by machine learning,
Have,
The discriminative model and the transformation model are neural networks.
The discriminative model learning unit
The discriminative model is generated so that the discriminative model is a model that correctly discriminates the data type of the training data from the converted data.
The conversion model learning unit
The noise attenuation model is generated by updating the conversion model so as to output the converted data so that the data identification unit cannot correctly identify the data, although it is similar to the training data.
The data processing unit
Based on the noise attenuation model generated by the conversion model learning unit, the preprocessed data is generated from the data output from the diagnosis target.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to claim 1. The conversion model learning unit updates the conversion model so that the data type output by the data identification unit is inverted with the data type of the learning data.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to claim 2. The conversion model learning unit
The transformation model
The error between the training data and the converted data, and
The noise attenuation model is generated by updating so that the error between the output result of the data identification unit and the data type that is an incorrect answer becomes small.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to claim 2 or 3. The conversion model learning unit
The transformation model
The error between the training data and the converted data,
The error between the output result of the data identification unit and the data type that is an incorrect answer, and
The noise attenuation model is generated by updating so that the error between the output result of the abnormality cause identification unit and the error cause type that is the correct answer becomes small.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to any one of claims 2 to 4. The diagnostic model learning unit generates two or more of the diagnostic models,
The diagnostic model of the abnormality cause identification unit is a model having good diagnostic accuracy from the two or more generated diagnostic models.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to any one of claims 2 to 5. It is provided with an input unit that accepts the input of hyperparameters used in the generation of the noise attenuation model.
The hyperparameters are parameters according to the data type of whether the learning data is the simulated data or the actual data.
The conversion model learning unit
The hyperparameter is multiplied by the error between the output result of the data identification unit and the teacher data which is the correct answer to generate the noise attenuation model.
The diagnostic system according to any one of claims 2 to 6. A display control unit for displaying the identification result of the abnormality cause identification unit on the display unit is provided.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to any one of claims 2 to 7. Before diagnosing the cause of the abnormality of the diagnosis target, the display control unit causes the display unit to display the correct answer rate of the diagnostic model or the data before and after the attenuation by the noise attenuation unit.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to claim 8. The display control unit causes the display unit to display the identification result and data before and after the attenuation by the noise attenuation unit.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to claim 8 or 9. The diagnostic model learning unit generates two or more of the diagnostic models,
The display control unit causes the display unit to display the correct answer rate of the diagnostic model and the data before and after the attenuation by the noise attenuation unit for each of the diagnostic models.
The abnormality diagnosis system according to any one of claims 8 to 10. It is equipped with an adjustment unit that adjusts the hyperparameters used in generating the noise attenuation model.
The transformation model learning unit generates a diagnostic model by updating the transformation model using the adjusted hyperparameters.
The display control unit
An adjustment reception image for receiving the adjustment of the adjustment unit, and an adjustment reception image.
The correct answer rate of the diagnostic model or the adjustment result including the data before and after the attenuation by the noise attenuation portion is obtained.
Display on the same display screen of the display unit,
The abnormality diagnosis system according to any one of claims 8 to 11. It is an abnormality diagnosis method for diagnosing the cause of an abnormality to be diagnosed.
A diagnostic step that identifies the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on the model, and
A learning step that generates the model by machine learning,
With
The diagnostic step
When the data output from the diagnosis target is input, a data processing step of generating preprocessed data in which noise, which is a feature part other than the feature part that makes it possible to identify the type of the abnormality cause from the data, is attenuated. When,
An abnormality cause identification step for identifying the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a diagnosis model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input, and an abnormality cause identification step.
Have,
The diagnostic model is a machine learning model.
The learning step
A diagnostic model learning step that generates the diagnostic model by machine learning,
A noise attenuation step that generates the noise-attenuated attenuated data from the training data for machine learning of the diagnostic model.
Have,
The learning data is simulated data simulating the abnormality of the diagnosis target or actual data indicating the abnormality of the diagnosis target.
The diagnostic model learning step
The diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data.
Abnormal diagnosis method. An abnormality diagnosis program that diagnoses the cause of an abnormality to be diagnosed.
On the computer
A diagnostic step that identifies the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on the model, and
A learning step that generates the model by machine learning,
To run,
The diagnostic step
When the data output from the diagnosis target is input, a data processing step of generating preprocessed data in which noise, which is a feature part other than the feature part that enables the type of the abnormality cause to be identified from the data, is attenuated. When,
An abnormality cause identification step for identifying the type of abnormality cause of the diagnosis target based on a diagnosis model that outputs the abnormality cause type of the diagnosis target when the preprocessed data is input, and an abnormality cause identification step.
Have,
The diagnostic model is a machine learning model.
The learning step
A diagnostic model learning step that generates the diagnostic model by machine learning,
A noise attenuation step that generates the noise-attenuated attenuated data from the training data for machine learning of the diagnostic model.
Have,
The learning data is simulated data simulating the abnormality of the diagnosis target or actual data showing the abnormality of the diagnosis target.
The diagnostic model learning step
The diagnostic model is generated by machine learning using the attenuated data as training data and the abnormality cause type as teacher data.
Abnormality diagnosis program.

Images