JPS63106535A - Method for evaluating performance of sprayer - Google Patents

Method for evaluating performance of sprayer

Info

Publication number
JPS63106535A
JPS63106535A JP24957386A JP24957386A JPS63106535A JP S63106535 A JPS63106535 A JP S63106535A JP 24957386 A JP24957386 A JP 24957386A JP 24957386 A JP24957386 A JP 24957386A JP S63106535 A JPS63106535 A JP S63106535A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sprayer
water
water droplet
distance
air stream
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP24957386A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Toru Harada
亨 原田
Yoshinori Terasawa
良則 寺沢
Yuji Kaihara
裕二 貝原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority to JP24957386A priority Critical patent/JPS63106535A/en
Publication of JPS63106535A publication Critical patent/JPS63106535A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To rapidly and simply evaluate performance, by measuring the flight distance of a spray stream when the spray stream injected in a wind tunnel is pushed back by the air stream impinged against said spray stream from the front surface thereof. CONSTITUTION:Water 2 is sent to a sprayer 1 by a pump 3 and the return water thereof is returned to a small tank. The flight orbit 4 of the water droplet discharged from the sprayer 1 is pushed back by the air stream 9 passing through a current plate 5 in a wind tunnel 8. When water is sprayed under a definite condition under the adjustment of flowmeters F1, F2 and pressure gauges P1, P2, the piercing distance of the water droplet into the air stream changes corresponding to a particle size. That is, the flight distance L of the water droplet is short in the normal sprayer and, when the sprayer becomes obsolete, the particle size of the water droplet becomes large and the distance L also becomes long and, therefore, performance can be rapidly and simply evaluated on the spot.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 「産業上の利用分野」 本発明はゴミ焼却炉ガス冷却室に適用される水噴霧器の
性能評価方法に関するものである。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION "Field of Industrial Application" The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the performance of a water sprayer applied to a gas cooling chamber of a garbage incinerator.

油等、水辺外の流体を噴霧することのできる噴霧器4ケ
も゛。
There are also 4 sprayers that can spray oil and other fluids outside the water.

「従来の技術」 従来の水噴霧器の性能評価方法について概要を第2図お
よび第3図に示すと、水噴霧器01の水噴霧ノズル02
より噴霧された水滴03を泊客2S04の中に予め入れ
ておいた油05上に捕獲し、それを写真[06にて写真
撮影し、写真より水滴03の粒径の大きさを調べ、噴霧
状態の良否を判定していた。
"Prior Art" An overview of the conventional performance evaluation method of water sprayers is shown in FIGS. 2 and 3.
The sprayed water droplets 03 are captured on the oil 05 that has been placed in the guest 2S04 in advance, and a photograph is taken of it in the photograph [06], and the size of the water droplets 03 is examined from the photograph, They were determining whether the condition was good or bad.

「発明が解決しようとする問題点」 従来技術に依れば、噴霧粒子径の大きさを計るため、手
間と多くの時間を要し、噴霧器を使用している現場での
迅速、簡便な性能評価をすることが困難であった。
``Problems to be solved by the invention'' According to the conventional technology, it takes a lot of time and effort to measure the size of the spray particles, and it is difficult to quickly and easily perform the job at the site where the sprayer is used. It was difficult to evaluate.

また、レーザ等に依る方法も考えられるが、装置自体の
コストが高くつき、不具合である。
A method using a laser or the like may also be considered, but the cost of the device itself is high and is problematic.

特に老朽化したノズルの使用可否を簡便に判定する方法
が望まれていた。
In particular, a method for easily determining whether or not an aging nozzle can be used has been desired.

「問題点を解決するための手段」 本発明は上記従来の問題点を解決したもので、噴n流に
対して正面から空気流を当て、液滴が押し戻される位置
と噴霧器先端との間の飛散距離のうち最長のものを計測
して噴′n器の性能を評価する噴霧器性能評価方法であ
る。
"Means for Solving the Problems" The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems of the conventional art. This is a sprayer performance evaluation method in which the performance of the sprayer is evaluated by measuring the longest scattering distance.

「作用」 液滴は粒径が小さく、速度が遅いほど空気流の影響を受
けて飛跡を変え易い、噴霧器は老朽化すると、噴霧特性
が劣化するため、粒径が太き(なる、そこで一定流速の
空気流に向けて、一定条件(ポンプ吐出流量、戻り流量
、吐出圧力、戻り圧力など)で噴霧すると粒径に応じて
空気流中への貫入距離が変化する。すなわち、正常な噴
霧器では飛散距離が小さいが老朽化す↑ ると大きくなる。
``Effect'' Droplets have a small particle size, and the slower the speed, the easier it is to change their trajectory due to the influence of airflow.As the atomizer ages, its spray characteristics deteriorate, so the droplet size becomes thicker (it becomes constant at that point). When spraying into an air stream at a certain flow rate under certain conditions (pump discharge flow rate, return flow rate, discharge pressure, return pressure, etc.), the penetration distance into the air stream changes depending on the particle size.In other words, with a normal atomizer, The scattering distance is small, but becomes larger as it ages.

「実施例」 本発明の一実施例を第1図に示す。"Example" An embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG.

1は噴霧器、2は水、3は水2を噴霧器lへ送るポンプ
、4は噴霧器1から放出される液滴の飛跡、5は整流板
、6は空気、7は空気6を整流板5へ送るブロア、8は
整流板5に取り付けた風胴、9は整流板5から吹出され
る空気流、Lは噴霧器1から放出される飛跡2の飛散距
離である。
1 is a sprayer, 2 is water, 3 is a pump that sends water 2 to sprayer L, 4 is a track of droplets released from sprayer 1, 5 is a rectifier plate, 6 is air, 7 is air 6 to rectifier plate 5 A sending blower, 8 is a wind barrel attached to the rectifier plate 5, 9 is an air flow blown out from the rectifier plate 5, and L is the scattering distance of the track 2 emitted from the sprayer 1.

P+、Fz は水2の流量計、P+ 、Pt は圧力計
で添字1はポンプ吐出ライン、2は戻りラインを示す。
P+, Fz are flow meters for water 2, P+, Pt are pressure gauges, subscript 1 is a pump discharge line, and 2 is a return line.

噴霧器lより放出された水滴は飛跡4に示すように、先
ず軸方向に進むが、空気流9にさらされて飛散距離りの
ところで押し戻される。
The water droplets discharged from the sprayer 1 first travel in the axial direction, as shown by the trajectory 4, but are exposed to the airflow 9 and pushed back at the scattering distance.

ここで、水2をポンプ3で噴霧器1に送ることによって
行う噴霧は流量計F’、 、  F、 、圧力計P、、
P、などにより調整し一定条件にし、また、均一な空気
[9を得るために風胴8にブロア7から空気6を送って
いる。
Here, the spraying performed by sending the water 2 to the sprayer 1 with the pump 3 is performed by flowmeters F', , F, , pressure gauges P, ,
In order to obtain uniform air [9], air 6 is sent from a blower 7 to the wind cylinder 8.

「発明の効果」 本発明は上記方法であるので、粒径を直接計ることなく
、噴霧器の良否を判定できるため、噴霧器を使用してい
る現場での迅速かつ顛便な噴霧器の性能評価が可能とな
る。
"Effects of the Invention" Since the present invention uses the method described above, it is possible to judge the quality of the sprayer without directly measuring the particle size, so it is possible to quickly and conveniently evaluate the performance of the sprayer at the site where the sprayer is used. becomes.

特に、老朽化したノズルの飛散距離を新品のものと比較
するだけで良否の判定をすることができる。等の効果を
有するものである。
In particular, it is possible to judge whether the nozzle is good or bad simply by comparing the scattering distance of an old nozzle with that of a new one. It has the following effects.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明の一実施例の概念図、第2図および第3
図は従来方法の説明図である。 1:噴霧器     2:水 3:ポンプ     4:飛跡 5:整流板     6:空気 7:ブロア     8:風胴 9:空気流 第2図
Figure 1 is a conceptual diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, Figures 2 and 3 are
The figure is an explanatory diagram of a conventional method. 1: Sprayer 2: Water 3: Pump 4: Track 5: Straightening plate 6: Air 7: Blower 8: Wind barrel 9: Air flow Figure 2

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1、噴霧流に対して正面から空気流を当て、液滴が押し
戻される位置と噴霧器先端との間の飛散距離のうち最長
のものを計測して噴霧器の性能を評価することを特徴と
する噴霧器性能評価方法。
1. A sprayer characterized in that the performance of the sprayer is evaluated by applying an air stream to the spray stream from the front and measuring the longest scattering distance between the position where droplets are pushed back and the tip of the sprayer. Performance evaluation method.
JP24957386A 1986-10-22 1986-10-22 Method for evaluating performance of sprayer Pending JPS63106535A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP24957386A JPS63106535A (en) 1986-10-22 1986-10-22 Method for evaluating performance of sprayer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP24957386A JPS63106535A (en) 1986-10-22 1986-10-22 Method for evaluating performance of sprayer

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS63106535A true JPS63106535A (en) 1988-05-11

Family

ID=17195013

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP24957386A Pending JPS63106535A (en) 1986-10-22 1986-10-22 Method for evaluating performance of sprayer

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS63106535A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104571123A (en) * 2014-12-08 2015-04-29 北京农业智能装备技术研究中心 Method and system for aerial pesticide application real time dynamic wind field simulation

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104571123A (en) * 2014-12-08 2015-04-29 北京农业智能装备技术研究中心 Method and system for aerial pesticide application real time dynamic wind field simulation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8250907B2 (en) System and method for determining atomization characteristics of spray liquids
Fritz et al. Measuring droplet size of agricultural spray nozzles− measurement distance and airspeed effects
Lewis et al. Atomization of liquids in high velocity gas streams
AU2006201532B2 (en) System and method for determining atomization characteristics of spray liquids
Ellis et al. PM—power and machinery: Design factors affecting spray characteristics and drift performance of air induction nozzles
Farooq et al. PA—precision agriculture: agricultural sprays in cross-flow and drift
Derksen et al. Droplet spectra and wind tunnel evaluation of venturi and pre-orifice nozzles
US7340902B2 (en) Method for operating an air-breathing engine
Dorman The atomization of liquid in a flat spray
GB1271196A (en) Spray nozzle
Gu et al. Droplet size distributions of adjuvant-amended sprays from an air-assisted five-port PWM nozzle
DE19506642C1 (en) Optical workpiece surface contour measuring system
JPS63106535A (en) Method for evaluating performance of sprayer
Giles et al. Intermittent control of liquid flow from fan nozzles in concurrent air streams: wind tunnel studies of droplet size effects
Guerra et al. Experimental investigation on the effect of liquid injection by multiple orifices in the formation of droplets in a Venturi scrubber
CN216572994U (en) Submicron monodisperse aerosol generating device and system
US3594128A (en) Fog tower for testing apparatus
US11061007B2 (en) Wetting test apparatus and method for gas sensor
Wolf et al. Calibration of greenhouse spray chambers—the importance of dynamic nozzle patternation
US8671874B2 (en) Process and apparatus for localized coating of assembled cascade impactor particle collection surfaces
Farooq et al. Assessment of an agricultural spray in a non–uniform cross–flow
JP2003014442A (en) Droplet volume measuring apparatus
JPH0243131B2 (en)
Roth et al. Rotating disk apparatus for the production of droplets of uniform size
Womac et al. Drop spectra for pneumatic atomizers at low discharge rates