JPS629869A - Removing method of burr from aluminum or magnesium alloy cast - Google Patents
Removing method of burr from aluminum or magnesium alloy castInfo
- Publication number
- JPS629869A JPS629869A JP14728785A JP14728785A JPS629869A JP S629869 A JPS629869 A JP S629869A JP 14728785 A JP14728785 A JP 14728785A JP 14728785 A JP14728785 A JP 14728785A JP S629869 A JPS629869 A JP S629869A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- shot
- work
- spherical
- burr
- alloy
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
(産業上の利用分野)
本発明はアルミニュウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物
の機械加工面に発生したバリの除去方法に関するもので
ある。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention relates to a method for removing burrs generated on a machined surface of an aluminum or magnesium alloy casting.
(従来の技術)
鋳物の機械加工面に発生したバリの除去方法としては従
来より種々の方法が行われているが、従来公知の方法に
よりアルミニニウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物の機
械加工で発生するバリを除去しようとすると、機械加工
面に傷を付けたり表面粗さを粗(したりする恐れがある
ため、グラインダー、ヤスリ、リュータ−、バンドブラ
シなどの工具を使用して手仕上げで行うのを普通とする
(発明が解決しようとする問題点)
ところが、これらの方法は手仕上げのため生産性が悪い
、この生産性を改善するための自動化の方法としてブラ
シによる専用機もあるが、この専用機では被加工物の外
周部のバリ取りには効果はあるけれどもブラシがとどか
ない個所のある被加工物に対しては効果は少なく、特殊
な手工具を作成して数工程のブラシ作業を手作業で補っ
て加工しなければならないという問題点もある。また、
バレル研摩は被加工物同士の衝突による打痕を防止する
ため、研摩機を仕切槽付きのものとしても研摩粒の目づ
まりが生ずるという問題点があるほか、加工時間が10
〜15分もかかり長いため、連続ライン化しようとする
と、前後工程と時間ピッチが整合せず、さらにそのうえ
研摩粒と被加工物の分離、洗浄、乾燥などの工程も付加
しなければならず、−貫したライン化を行うことは困難
であるという問題点がある。さらに、高圧水を衝突させ
るバリ取り方法も単なる機械加工面のエツジ仕上げ程度
のものには良いが、バリの厚さが0.1日程度以上にな
ると除去困難になるという問題点があり、ガラスショッ
トによる噴射加工法では、ガラスショットが硬いうえ加
工中に破砕されて鋭いエツジを持つものとなり、機械加
工面を粗くするだけでバリ取りには有効でないという問
題点がある。(Prior art) Various methods have been used to remove burrs generated on the machined surface of castings, but the burrs generated during machining of aluminum or magnesium alloy castings can be removed by conventionally known methods. If you try to remove it, there is a risk of scratching the machined surface or making the surface rough, so it is usually done by hand using tools such as a grinder, file, router, band brush, etc. (Problem to be solved by the invention) However, these methods have low productivity due to manual finishing.There is also a special machine using a brush as an automation method to improve this productivity, but this special machine Although it is effective for removing burrs from the outer periphery of the workpiece, it is less effective for workpieces that have areas where the brush cannot reach, so special hand tools are created and several steps of brush work are done manually. There is also the problem that it has to be compensated for by processing.
In barrel polishing, in order to prevent dents caused by collisions between workpieces, even if the polishing machine is equipped with a partition tank, there is the problem that clogging of abrasive grains occurs, and the processing time is 10 minutes.
It takes ~15 minutes, so if you try to make it into a continuous line, the time pitch will not match the previous and previous processes, and on top of that, you will have to add processes such as separating the abrasive grains and the workpiece, washing, drying, etc. -There is a problem that it is difficult to form a consistent line. Furthermore, the method of deburring by bombarding high-pressure water is good for simply finishing the edges of machined surfaces, but there is a problem that it becomes difficult to remove burrs when the thickness of the burrs exceeds about 0.1 days. The problem with the injection processing method using shot is that the glass shot is hard and breaks during processing, resulting in sharp edges, which only roughens the machined surface and is not effective for deburring.
(問題点を解決するための手段)
本発明のアルミニュウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物
のバリの除去方法は、上記のような問題点をなくするた
めになされたもので、平均粒径が40〜300μmの球
形または略球形で結晶形が面心立方格子のCuまたはC
u合金粉を、投射速度30〜70m/seeで投射する
ことを特徴とするものである。(Means for Solving the Problems) The method for removing burrs from aluminum or magnesium alloy castings of the present invention has been made to eliminate the above-mentioned problems. Or Cu or C that is approximately spherical and has a face-centered cubic lattice crystal shape.
This method is characterized by projecting the u-alloy powder at a projecting speed of 30 to 70 m/see.
本発明においては、先ず機械加工の施されたアルミニュ
ウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物を回転テーブルに載
せるか、ハンガーに吊下げるか、またはコンベヤー上に
載せるかして被加工物が相互に衝突しないようにして投
射室内に移送する。In the present invention, the machined aluminum or magnesium alloy castings are first placed on a rotary table, hung on a hanger, or placed on a conveyor to prevent the workpieces from colliding with each other. Move indoors.
投射室内には遠心投射装置または空気噴射投射装置が設
けられており、投射装置から微細な投射材を被加工物の
バリ生成部に衝撃的に投射する。このようにして投射材
が投射されると被加工物に生成していた機械加工バリは
、動的衝撃を受けて切断されるとともにバリが取れた後
のエツジ部に僅かな丸味がつけられるから、所定の投射
が終了したとき、被加工物は投射室内から外に移送する
一方、投射室内から投射材の分離回収が自動的に行われ
ることは従来の投射材投射式のバリ取り方法と殆んど変
わることはないが、本発明における限定理由を説明する
と、つぎの通りである。A centrifugal projection device or an air jet projection device is provided in the projection chamber, and the projection device impacts the fine projection material onto the burr-generating portion of the workpiece. When the shot material is projected in this way, the machining burrs that are generated on the workpiece are cut off by the dynamic impact, and the edges after the burrs are removed are slightly rounded. , when the prescribed projection is completed, the workpiece is transferred from the projection chamber to the outside, while the shot material is automatically separated and collected from the projection chamber, which is different from the conventional deburring method using the projection method. Although not subject to change, the reasons for the limitations in the present invention are as follows.
アルミニュウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物の機械加
工面に生成したバリを加工表面を粗くしないで除去する
作業結果の良否は、投射材の材質、形状、平均粒径およ
び被加工物に対する衝突圧力などにより影響される。一
般にアルミニュウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物のよ
うに軟質金属の機械加工面の粗さを変えることなく、あ
る物質を衝突させて生成したバリを除去することは矛盾
することなのである。ゴム、プラスチックのような弾性
のある有機物系の非金属投射材は加工面を荒さないけれ
ども、投射材に弾性があるため運動エネルギーが吸収さ
れ、バリ取りに役立たないばかりか、衝突時に吸収され
たエネルギーによる熱によってを搬物が炭化し、被加工
物を黒灰色に着色するという欠点があって、有機物系の
投射材を用いることができない、また、酸化物系の投射
材は硬さが高く粒子が粗ければ被加工物の加工面を梨地
にしてしまうために用いることができず、粒子が微細で
あればバリ取りができないから用いることができない、
さらに、アルミニュウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物
のような軟質金属の機械加工バリの除去のための投射材
には一定以上の質量と歪みまたは変形可能な可塑性が必
要である。The quality of the work result for removing burrs generated on the machined surface of aluminum or magnesium alloy castings without roughening the machined surface is influenced by the material, shape, average particle size of the projectile, and impact pressure against the workpiece. . In general, it is contradictory to remove burrs generated by impacting a certain material without changing the roughness of the machined surface of soft metals such as aluminum or magnesium alloy castings. Elastic organic non-metallic blasting materials such as rubber and plastic do not roughen the machined surface, but the elasticity of the blasting materials absorbs kinetic energy, which not only makes it useless for deburring, but also absorbs it upon impact. The heat generated by the energy carbonizes the conveyed material and colors the workpiece blackish-gray, making it impossible to use organic material-based projectile materials, and oxide-based projectile materials have high hardness. If the particles are coarse, the machined surface of the workpiece will become matte, so it cannot be used, and if the particles are fine, it cannot be used because it cannot be deburred.
Furthermore, a projectile material for removing machining burrs from soft metals such as aluminum or magnesium alloy castings requires a certain mass or more and plasticity that allows distortion or deformation.
このような条件を備えた物質としてFe、 ZnSPb
。Fe, ZnSPb are substances that meet these conditions.
.
Cuおよびその合金がある。ところが、pbは人体に対
して有害であるから用いることができず、Feは含有す
る炭素の量により硬さが高くなり、炭素の少ない純鉄に
近いものでないと満足できる結果が得られず、そのうえ
投射中に発生した微粉が被加工物表面上に残留し、点線
現象の原因となり易いから用いることができない、また
、Znは機械的性質から見ると良好な数値を示している
が、同一粒径、同−硬さの球形Cu粉と比較してみた場
合鋳物の加工面を粗くする。これはZnの結晶格子が稠
密六方晶であるに対してCuが等軸面存立方晶であるた
めと思われる。このためZnnクシヨツト使用できない
、これに対してCuおよびその合金の投射材は投射材用
として質量、歪変形量、熱電導率などの性質に優れ、か
つ好ましい形状の球形粉を製造し易い利点がある。偏平
状Cu粉および01合金粉は投射の際空気抵抗を受けて
減速するとともに集塵装置中に吸引され易く失われる量
が多く不経済である。Cuおよびその合金の投射材の粒
径は大きい方がバリ取りの効果が当然大きいが、加工面
粗度維持から制限があり、平均粒径が4Opm未満では
バリ取り効果が微小で使用できず、300μmを越える
と被加工物の加工面を投射材でもって粗くするから使用
できない、そして、Cuおよびその合金投射材による被
加工物への接触圧は、これを投射材の衝突時の投射材速
度に置換して表わすと、機械加工面のバリ除去には最低
30m/secの速度を必要とし、加工面の荒れを防止
するためには最高投射速度を70m/sec以下に押さ
えなければならない。There is Cu and its alloys. However, PB cannot be used because it is harmful to the human body, and Fe has a high hardness depending on the amount of carbon it contains, and satisfactory results cannot be obtained unless it is close to pure iron with less carbon. Moreover, the fine powder generated during projection remains on the surface of the workpiece, which tends to cause the dotted line phenomenon, so it cannot be used.Also, although Zn shows good values in terms of mechanical properties, When compared with spherical Cu powder of the same diameter and hardness, it roughens the machined surface of the casting. This seems to be because the crystal lattice of Zn is a close-packed hexagonal crystal lattice, whereas the crystal lattice of Cu is a cubic crystal with equiaxed planes. For this reason, Znn shot cannot be used. On the other hand, shot materials made of Cu and its alloys have excellent properties such as mass, strain and thermal conductivity, and have the advantage of being easy to produce spherical powder with a desirable shape. be. The flat Cu powder and the 01 alloy powder are uneconomical because they are slowed down by air resistance during projection and are easily sucked into the dust collector, resulting in a large amount of the powder being lost. Naturally, the larger the particle size of the shot material of Cu and its alloys, the greater the deburring effect, but there is a limit to maintaining the machined surface roughness, and if the average particle size is less than 4 Opm, the deburring effect is too small to be used. If it exceeds 300 μm, it cannot be used because the shot surface of the workpiece will be roughened by the shot material, and the contact pressure of the Cu and its alloy shot material to the workpiece is determined by the velocity of the shot material at the time of collision of the shot material. Expressed in terms of , a speed of at least 30 m/sec is required to remove burrs from a machined surface, and the maximum projection speed must be kept below 70 m/sec to prevent roughening of the machined surface.
(作用)
本発明のアルミニュウムまたはマグネシェウム合金鋳物
のバリの除去方法によれば、機械加工を施されたアルミ
ニュウムまたはマグネシェウム合金鋳物が回転テーブル
、ハンガーまたはコンベアーにより被加工物が相互に衝
突しないようにして投射室内に移送され、この被加工物
に対して投射室内の遠心投射装置または空気噴射投射装
置から平均粒径が40〜300μ…の球形または略球形
で結晶形が面心立方格子のCuまたはCu合金粉が投射
速度30〜7 Q m/secで被加工物のバリ生成部
に衝撃的に投射され、被加工物に生成していた機械加工
バリは、動的衝撃を受けて切断されるとともにバリが取
れた後のエツジ部に僅かな丸みがつけられる。(Function) According to the method for removing burrs from aluminum or magnesium alloy castings of the present invention, machined aluminum or magnesium alloy castings are removed using a rotary table, hanger, or conveyor to prevent workpieces from colliding with each other. Cu or Cu having an average particle size of 40 to 300 μm, spherical or nearly spherical shape, and face-centered cubic lattice crystal shape is transferred to the projection chamber, and from a centrifugal projection device or an air injection projection device in the projection chamber. The alloy powder is impactfully projected onto the burr-generating part of the workpiece at a projection speed of 30 to 7 Q m/sec, and the machining burrs that had been generated on the workpiece are cut off by the dynamic impact. After the burr is removed, the edges are slightly rounded.
(実施例)
実施例1
フライス加工されたアルミニニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物
製47257部パルプボディをテーブル型エアープラス
ト装置内に載置し、平均粒径150μmの球形Cu粉の
投射材を投射速度60m+/seCで100kg投射し
たところ、フライス加工で生成した0、 08 tm厚
さのバリは全て除去され、面粗さも素材のRz2.8μ
mがそのまま維持可能であった。(Example) Example 1 A 47257-part milled aluminum alloy die-casting pulp body was placed in a table-type air blast device, and a blasting material of spherical Cu powder with an average particle size of 150 μm was blasted at a blasting speed of 60 m+/secC. When 100 kg was projected on the material, all the 0.08 tm thick burrs generated during milling were removed, and the surface roughness was as low as Rz 2.8μ of the material.
m could be maintained as is.
実施例2
フライス加工されたアルミニュウム合金ダイカスト鋳物
製コンピュータ一部品をテーブル型エアープラスト装置
内に載置し、平均粒径250 pegの球形Cu粉の投
射材を投射速度30 s/seeで4−投射したところ
、フライス加工により生じたシャープエツジが除去され
、エツジ部に半径0.06鶴の丸み部ができた。加工面
の面粗さはRZ3.0μmで投射前とほとんど差がなか
った。Example 2 A computer part made of a milled aluminum alloy die-casting was placed in a table-type air blasting device, and 4 shots of spherical Cu powder with an average particle size of 250 peg were shot at a shooting speed of 30 s/see. As a result, the sharp edges caused by milling were removed, and a rounded part with a radius of 0.06 was created at the edge. The surface roughness of the processed surface was RZ3.0 μm, which was almost the same as before projection.
実施例3
フライス加工されたマグネシュウム合金ダイカスト鋳物
製自動車部品をエアープラスト装置内に*置し、平均粒
径80μmの球形Cu合金粉の投射材を投射速度65麟
八eCで2 kg投射したところ、フライス加工で生成
した0、 06 tm厚さのバリが除去されエツジに0
.05 wの丸み部が付いた。加工面の面粗さはRz2
.5μ清で投射前とほとんど差がなかった。Example 3 A milled magnesium alloy die-cast automobile part was placed in an air blast device, and 2 kg of spherical Cu alloy powder with an average particle size of 80 μm was projected at a projection speed of 65 eC. The 0.06 tm thick burr generated during milling is removed and the edges are 0.06 tm thick.
.. It has a rounded part of 05W. The surface roughness of the machined surface is Rz2
.. There was almost no difference between the 5μ and before injection.
(発明の効果)
本発明は前記説明から明らかなように、機械加工面に生
成したバリを加工表面を粗くしないで除去でき、他の工
程と作業時間ピッチを整合させて自動化できるという利
点があり、用いる投射材としては質量、歪変形量、熱伝
導率などの性質に優れ、好ましい形状の球形粉を製造し
易く、投射の際空気抵抗を受けて減速することもなく、
投射室内から分離回収が自動的に行うことができ、存搬
物のように炭化して被加工物に黒灰色の着色を付けるこ
ともなく、そのうえ投射中に生成した微粉が被加工物表
面上に残留して点線現象の原因となることもないという
利点があることとあいまって、本発明は産業の発達に寄
与するところ極めて大なるものがある。(Effects of the Invention) As is clear from the above description, the present invention has the advantage that burrs generated on the machined surface can be removed without roughening the machined surface, and that it can be automated by matching the working time pitch with other processes. The projectile material to be used has excellent properties such as mass, amount of strain, and thermal conductivity, and it is easy to produce spherical powder with a desirable shape, and there is no deceleration due to air resistance when projecting.
Separation and recovery can be performed automatically from the projection chamber, and the workpiece will not be carbonized and colored black-gray like existing materials, and the fine powder generated during projection will not be on the surface of the workpiece. Coupled with the advantage that it does not remain behind and cause the dotted line phenomenon, the present invention greatly contributes to the development of industry.
Claims (1)
形が面心立方格子のCuまたはCu合金粉を、投射速度
30〜70m/secで投射することを特徴とするアル
ミニュウムまたはマグネシュウム合金鋳物のバリの除去
方法。A burr for aluminum or magnesium alloy castings characterized by projecting Cu or Cu alloy powder having a spherical or substantially spherical crystal shape with an average particle size of 40 to 300 μm and a face-centered cubic lattice at a projecting speed of 30 to 70 m/sec. How to remove.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP14728785A JPS629869A (en) | 1985-07-04 | 1985-07-04 | Removing method of burr from aluminum or magnesium alloy cast |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP14728785A JPS629869A (en) | 1985-07-04 | 1985-07-04 | Removing method of burr from aluminum or magnesium alloy cast |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPS629869A true JPS629869A (en) | 1987-01-17 |
Family
ID=15426787
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP14728785A Pending JPS629869A (en) | 1985-07-04 | 1985-07-04 | Removing method of burr from aluminum or magnesium alloy cast |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPS629869A (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1161479A (en) * | 1966-08-17 | 1969-08-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Protective Coating on Magnesium |
JPS569169A (en) * | 1979-06-29 | 1981-01-30 | Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> | Blasting material for blasting process |
JPS6023946A (en) * | 1983-07-19 | 1985-02-06 | Toshiba Corp | Low pressure mercury vapor discharge lamp |
-
1985
- 1985-07-04 JP JP14728785A patent/JPS629869A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1161479A (en) * | 1966-08-17 | 1969-08-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Protective Coating on Magnesium |
JPS569169A (en) * | 1979-06-29 | 1981-01-30 | Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> | Blasting material for blasting process |
JPS6023946A (en) * | 1983-07-19 | 1985-02-06 | Toshiba Corp | Low pressure mercury vapor discharge lamp |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US2600358A (en) | Method of surfacing metal objects | |
JP3997084B2 (en) | Method of removing and regenerating hard carbon coating film and regenerated substrate | |
JPS629869A (en) | Removing method of burr from aluminum or magnesium alloy cast | |
JPH0757468B2 (en) | Mold cleaning method by electric discharge machining | |
CN108466177A (en) | A kind of die cast metal part blasting craft | |
KR102363900B1 (en) | Sander with improved efficiency | |
KR20010112847A (en) | Blasting material for blasting process | |
CN207616407U (en) | A kind of energy-efficient impeller head | |
JP4165794B2 (en) | shot | |
JP2887228B2 (en) | shot | |
CN209754926U (en) | Throwing head and shot blasting machine with same | |
Tönshoff et al. | Improving the characteristics of magnesium workpieces by burnishing operations | |
JP2013000814A (en) | Zinc-base alloy shot | |
JP2000127045A (en) | Projection material for sand blast | |
TW202010853A (en) | Surface treatment method for product of magnesium die casting using a wet blasting machine to spray wet blasting material by high air pressure onto the surface of the magnesium die casting | |
JP2015155145A (en) | Zinc-base alloy shot | |
CN106891258A (en) | A kind of method for processing die cast metal parts | |
JP3027980B2 (en) | How to remove castings | |
CN219542276U (en) | Starter shell die-casting unit production line | |
JP2630947B2 (en) | Blasting method using zinc-based blast shot | |
CN211867509U (en) | Paint equipment is shelled in stainless steel goods surface environmental protection | |
JP3830054B2 (en) | Blasting method | |
JPH1190833A (en) | Luster finish method with blasting of polishing material and polishing material for use in it | |
JPH0822504B2 (en) | How to blast aluminum die cast products | |
CN110799305B (en) | Zinc-based alloy pellet and method for manufacturing the same |