JPS61228501A - Method for deciding treatment of plant abnormality - Google Patents
Method for deciding treatment of plant abnormalityInfo
- Publication number
- JPS61228501A JPS61228501A JP60066687A JP6668785A JPS61228501A JP S61228501 A JPS61228501 A JP S61228501A JP 60066687 A JP60066687 A JP 60066687A JP 6668785 A JP6668785 A JP 6668785A JP S61228501 A JPS61228501 A JP S61228501A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- abnormality
- knowledge
- plant
- cause
- alarm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
- G05B23/0245—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model based on a qualitative model, e.g. rule based; if-then decisions
- G05B23/0248—Causal models, e.g. fault tree; digraphs; qualitative physics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0267—Fault communication, e.g. human machine interface [HMI]
- G05B23/027—Alarm generation, e.g. communication protocol; Forms of alarm
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0275—Fault isolation and identification, e.g. classify fault; estimate cause or root of failure
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
- Y04S10/52—Outage or fault management, e.g. fault detection or location
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
- Safety Devices In Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
[発明の技術分野〕
本発明は原子力発電プラントまたは火力発電プラント等
の大規模システムの異常時処置決定方法に関する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Technical Field of the Invention] The present invention relates to a method for deciding what to do in the event of an abnormality in a large-scale system such as a nuclear power plant or a thermal power plant.
[発明の技術的背景とその問題点]
原子力発電プラントまたは火力発電プラント等の大規模
システムでは、異常が起った場合に多数の警報が発生し
、多数の信号が正常時と異なる挙動を示すため運転員自
身が混乱を招いて異常の原因やそれに対応する的確な処
置が即座に判断できないという問題があった。[Technical background of the invention and its problems] In large-scale systems such as nuclear power plants or thermal power plants, many alarms are generated when an abnormality occurs, and many signals exhibit behavior different from normal times. Therefore, there was a problem in that the operator himself was confused and could not immediately determine the cause of the abnormality and appropriate measures to take in response to it.
このような事象に対する従来の解決方法としては、第3
図に示すようなプラントに発生する可能性のある全ての
異常事象を想定し、各事象ごとに原因を起点とし、その
異常が進展した場合のプラントデータの挙動を組合わせ
て異常の原因−結果を結ぶ樹木状のデータ(Cause
ConsequenceT ree 以下COT
という)を予め用意しておき、異常が生じた場合にその
時のプラントデータを用いてOCTを辿って原因を同定
するようにしたものが提案されていた。The conventional solution to such an event is the third method.
Assuming all the abnormal events that may occur in the plant as shown in the figure, starting from the cause of each event, and combining the behavior of the plant data when the abnormality progresses, we calculate the cause-effect of the abnormality. Tree-like data connecting (Cause
Consequence T ree below COT
It has been proposed that a system is prepared in advance, and when an abnormality occurs, the cause can be identified by tracing OCT using plant data at that time.
しかしながら、上記した従来の解決方法では想定される
異常原因を全て挙げるのが困難であり、もし考慮されて
いない異常が生じた場合には原因の同定が不可能になる
という場合があり、また異常事象の数が多くなるとこれ
を記述するOCTは非常に複雑となりその作成が非常に
困難となる。However, with the conventional solution methods described above, it is difficult to list all possible causes of abnormalities, and if an abnormality that has not been taken into account occurs, it may be impossible to identify the cause; As the number of events increases, OCT to describe them becomes extremely complex and extremely difficult to create.
しかもこれを記憶する容量が膨大になり、さらにOCT
に誤りがあった場合にはその修正、プラント構成に変更
があった場合等のOCTの変更、新たな異常が発見され
た場合のOCTの追加等が困難になるというような不具
合があった。Moreover, the capacity to store this data has become enormous, and OCT
There have been problems such as difficulty in correcting errors in the system, changing OCT when there is a change in the plant configuration, adding OCT when a new abnormality is discovered, etc.
[発明の目的]
本発明は、上記事情に鑑みてなされたもので、その目的
は、発電プラント等の大規模システムにおいて異常が生
じた場合にプラントデータを用いて自動的にOCTに相
当するものを作成し、異常の原因、現状、将来を推定し
て対応する処置を運転員に表示することによってプラン
トの安全性、稼働率の向上を図るようにしたプラントの
異常時処理決定方法を提供することにある。[Purpose of the Invention] The present invention was made in view of the above circumstances, and its purpose is to automatically provide a system equivalent to OCT using plant data when an abnormality occurs in a large-scale system such as a power generation plant. To provide a method for deciding what to do in the event of an abnormality in a plant, which improves plant safety and operation rate by estimating the cause, current status, and future of the abnormality and displaying the corresponding measures to the operator. There is a particular thing.
[発明の概要]
本発明は、上記目的を達成するために、原子力発電プラ
ントまたは火力発電プラントのような大規模システムに
おける自動安全保護系のインターロックに関する知識と
異常現象の物理的因果関係に関する知識を用いて異常時
のプラントデータから異常の原因−結果を結ぶ図表を作
成し、この図表によって異常の原因と異常の現状と異常
の将来の状態を推定し、対応する処置を決定するように
したプラントの異常時処置決定方法に関するものである
。[Summary of the Invention] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention utilizes knowledge regarding the interlock of automatic safety protection systems in large-scale systems such as nuclear power plants or thermal power plants, and knowledge regarding the physical cause-and-effect relationship of abnormal phenomena. A diagram connecting the cause and effect of an abnormality is created from the plant data at the time of an abnormality using , and this diagram is used to estimate the cause of the abnormality, the current state of the abnormality, and the future state of the abnormality, and determine the corresponding measures. The present invention relates to a method for deciding what to do in the event of an abnormality in a plant.
大規模プラントの状態は、多量のアナログ信号や警報の
ようなディジタル信号によって検知される。本発明では
、アナログ信号についてはプラント設計時の安全解析や
運転経験から各々の信号の特性に合った異常検出法(例
えば物理モデルやその信号の過去の挙動の統計的性質か
ら現在の挙動を予測するモデルであるARモデルとの比
較)と正常/異常を判定する閾値を定めておき、閾値判
定を行うことによって正常/異常を0N10FFで表わ
すような他の監視システムの出力と、プラント制御室に
設けられている警報や機器の運転/休止を示すような信
号を用いて、二値で表現される信号の組み合せとしてプ
ラントの状態を把握する。、(以下これらの信号の全て
を広い意味で警報という。)
異常が生じた場合には“’ON″となった警報のみを集
め、これらの間を自動安全保護系のインターロックに関
する知識(Iji子カアカプラントにとると、[主ポン
プがトリップすると自動的に原子炉がスクラムする]と
いうような知識)と、異常現象の物理的因果関係に関す
る知識([ポンプがトリップすれば吐出圧力は低下する
」というような知iJ)とを用いて結んでゆき、最上流
となった警報が異常の原因を示し、最下流となったもの
が現状を示し、その次に“’ ON ”となる可能性の
あるものが将来の状態と判定するものである。The status of large-scale plants is detected by a large number of analog signals and digital signals such as alarms. In the present invention, for analog signals, we use an abnormality detection method that matches the characteristics of each signal based on safety analysis during plant design and operational experience (for example, predicting the current behavior from a physical model or statistical properties of the signal's past behavior). By determining the threshold value for determining normality/abnormality (comparison with the AR model, which is a model for The state of the plant is understood as a combination of signals expressed in binary values, using installed alarms and signals indicating the operation/stopping of equipment. (Hereinafter, all of these signals are referred to as alarms in a broad sense.) If an abnormality occurs, collect only the alarms that are "ON" and use knowledge about interlocking of automatic safety protection systems (Iji) to collect them. For the child Kaaka plant, knowledge such as ``If the main pump trips, the reactor will automatically scram'') and knowledge about the physical cause and effect of abnormal phenomena (``If the pump trips, the discharge pressure will drop.'' The most upstream alarm indicates the cause of the abnormality, the most downstream indicates the current situation, and the next possibility is that it will become "ON". A certain state is determined to be the future state.
運転員に与える処理ガイドとしては、上記の警報毎にそ
れを“ON”にする原因とその処理を記載した事故処理
マニュアルを準備しておき、異常の現状を示す警報の重
要度が、処置を施すことによってプラントを正常状態に
回復させる事が可能な段階にランク付けされたものであ
れば、原因を示す警報に対するマニュアルを表示する。As a processing guide to give to operators, an accident processing manual should be prepared that describes the cause of turning on each of the above-mentioned alarms and the corresponding processing. If the item is ranked at a level where it is possible to restore the plant to a normal state by performing the following actions, a manual for the alarm indicating the cause will be displayed.
また“ON ”となった警報の重要度中に、異常の回復
が不可能でプラントを安全に停止させる必要のある段階
にランク付けされているものがあればこれを優先して表
示する。更に、次に自動機能によって“ON″となるべ
き警報を予測し、自動機能が正常に作動しているかどう
かの検査も行う。原因を示す警報が複数個環れた場合に
は多重異常事象か知識ベースかが不完全であるので、そ
の旨を表示して運転員の判断に任せることになるが、後
の解析により知識ベースの不備が明らかとなった場合に
は、これを修正し、同一事象については次回からは正し
い推論が行えるようになる。Furthermore, if there is an alarm ranked in the importance level of the "ON" alarms at a stage where recovery from the abnormality is impossible and the plant needs to be safely stopped, this is displayed with priority. Furthermore, it predicts the next alarm that should be turned on by the automatic function, and checks whether the automatic function is operating normally. If there are multiple alarms indicating the cause, it is incomplete to determine whether it is a multiple abnormal event or the knowledge base, so this will be displayed and left to the operator's discretion, but later analysis will show that the knowledge base If any deficiencies are found, they will be corrected and correct inferences will be made regarding the same event the next time.
上記のようにしてプラントの異常時にその程度に応じた
適切なガイドを与える事によりプラントの安全性や稼働
率の向上を図ることができる。As described above, when an abnormality occurs in a plant, by providing appropriate guidance according to the degree of abnormality, it is possible to improve the safety and operation rate of the plant.
[発明の実施例] 本発明の実施例を図面を参照して説明する。[Embodiments of the invention] Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
第1図は本発明の一実施例の機能構成図を示すもので、
プラント1から得られた監視データは異常時処置決定装
置2および他の監視機能7に入力される。この異常時処
置決定装置2は警報テープル3.知識ベース4.推論部
5および表示装置6とから構成されている。FIG. 1 shows a functional configuration diagram of an embodiment of the present invention.
Monitoring data obtained from the plant 1 is input to the abnormality action determining device 2 and other monitoring functions 7. This abnormality action determining device 2 has a warning table 3. Knowledge base 4. It is composed of an inference section 5 and a display device 6.
警報テーブル3では、制御盤に設けられた本来の意味で
の警報信号と機器の運転/休止を示す信号とアナログ量
を監視して異常を検出する他の監視システムの出力信号
をまとめて0N10FFの二値信号の集まりでプラント
の状態を記述するテーブルを作成する。In alarm table 3, the original alarm signals provided on the control panel, signals indicating equipment operation/stop, and output signals of other monitoring systems that monitor analog quantities and detect abnormalities are summarized as 0N10FF. Create a table that describes the plant status using a collection of binary signals.
知識ベース4では、各々の警報の名称や重要度等の属性
に関する知識と自動安全保護系のインターロックによる
警報間の論理結合に関する知識と異常現象の物理的因果
関係に関する知識が記憶されている。この知識ベース4
の内容は、第3図に示した従来のOCTと同じ情報を取
り出せるが、従来のOCTのように原因から各信号の挙
動を結んだ状態で固定して記述しであるのではなく、個
々の警報について他の警報とどのような条件で結ばれて
いるかを単位とした知識の集まりとして構成されている
ため、作成が容易で、また出来上ってからの修正、変更
、追加も容易に行える。The knowledge base 4 stores knowledge about attributes such as the name and importance of each alarm, knowledge about logical connections between alarms by interlocking of an automatic safety protection system, and knowledge about physical causal relationships of abnormal phenomena. This knowledge base 4
The content of ``can extract the same information as the conventional OCT shown in Figure 3, but instead of describing the behavior of each signal in a fixed state connected to the cause as in the conventional OCT, it extracts the same information as the conventional OCT. Because it is structured as a collection of knowledge based on the conditions under which alarms are connected to other alarms, it is easy to create, and it is also easy to modify, change, and add after completion. .
推論部5では、警報テーブル3からプラント状態を読込
み、知識ベース4を用いて“ON ”となっている警報
を結んで異常が発生する毎に即座にOCTに相当するも
のを作成し原因、現状、将来の推定をhう。また、この
OCTに相当するものを表示することにより推論の理由
を表示し、運転員の信頼度を^めるものである。The inference unit 5 reads the plant status from the alarm table 3, uses the knowledge base 4 to connect the alarms that are "ON", and immediately creates something equivalent to OCT every time an abnormality occurs to determine the cause and current situation. , estimate the future. Furthermore, by displaying something equivalent to this OCT, the reason for the inference is displayed, increasing the reliability of the operator.
次に、本発明方法によるアルゴリズムを第2図のフロー
チャートについて説明する。Next, the algorithm according to the method of the present invention will be explained with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
先ず、警報テーブル3より第1ステツプ11としてプラ
ント状態を周期的に取込み、第2ステツプ12では前回
入力された警報パターンと比較し、自動機能が正常か否
かを判断し正常であれば次の第3ステツプ13で新しい
警報が発生しているか否かの判断がなされ、新しい゛警
報が発生していなければ、第1ステツプ11に戻り、上
記した手順を繰り返す。また新しい警報が発生していれ
ばそれについて以下に述べるような推論を行う。第4ス
テツプ14では新しい警報にインターロックに関する知
識を用いて最上流、@下流警報の推定を行い、さらに第
5ステツプ15としては物理的因果関係に関する知識を
用いて最上流、最下流警報を推定し第7ステツプ17に
おいて異常の程度に応じて原因を示す警報に対する処置
マニュアルかプラントを安全停止させるための処置マニ
ュアルを表示する。First, the plant status is periodically fetched from the alarm table 3 in the first step 11, and in the second step 12, it is compared with the previously input alarm pattern to determine whether the automatic function is normal or not, and if it is normal, the next In the third step 13, it is determined whether a new alarm has occurred, and if no new alarm has occurred, the process returns to the first step 11 and the above-described procedure is repeated. Furthermore, if a new alarm occurs, the following inferences are made regarding it. In the fourth step 14, the most upstream and @downstream alarms are estimated using knowledge about interlocks for new alarms, and in the fifth step 15, the most upstream and most downstream alarms are estimated using knowledge about physical causal relationships. Then, in a seventh step 17, a treatment manual for an alarm indicating the cause or a treatment manual for safely shutting down the plant is displayed depending on the degree of abnormality.
また、第6ステツプ16では次に発生すべき警報を予測
し記憶しておく。ざらに異常の推論の結果、自動的に作
成されるCOTに相当するものの要求があれば第7ステ
ツプ17において判定理由として表示することもできる
。また、第2ステツプ12において自動機能が正常でな
ければ第8ステツプ18では自動機能異常警報を発生す
る。Further, in the sixth step 16, the next alarm to be generated is predicted and stored. If there is a request for something equivalent to an automatically created COT as a result of the rough inference of an abnormality, it can be displayed as a reason for determination in the seventh step 17. Further, if the automatic function is not normal in the second step 12, an automatic function abnormality alarm is generated in the eighth step 18.
[発明の効果]
以上説明したように、本発明のプラントの異常時処置決
定方法によれば、プラントに異常が生じた場合、自動安
全保護系のインタロックに関する知識、異常現象の物理
的因果関係に関する知識を用いて作成、修正、変更、追
加の容易な知識としてまとめている知識ベースを検索し
て自動的にOCTに相当するものを作成し、異常の原因
、現状。[Effects of the Invention] As explained above, according to the method for deciding what to do when an abnormality occurs in a plant according to the present invention, when an abnormality occurs in a plant, knowledge about the interlock of the automatic safety protection system and the physical cause and effect relationship of the abnormal phenomenon can be used. Search the knowledge base that is summarized as knowledge that can be easily created, modified, changed, and added using the knowledge related to OCT, automatically create something equivalent to OCT, and understand the cause of the abnormality and the current situation.
将来を推定し、かつそれに対応した処置を運転員に表示
することができるので、運転員の異常時処置を支援する
とともにプラントの安全性、稼働率の向上を図ることが
できる。Since the future can be estimated and the corresponding measures can be displayed to the operator, it is possible to support the operator in dealing with abnormalities and to improve the safety and operation rate of the plant.
第1図は本発明の一実施例の機能構成図、第2図は本発
明方法によるアルゴリズムを示すフローチャート、第3
図は従来方法による異常の原因−結果を結ぶ樹木状デー
タを示す図である。
1・・・プラント、 2・・・異常処置決定装
置3・・・警報テーブル、 4・・・知識ベース5・
・・推論部、 6・・・表示部(8733)
代理人 弁理士 猪 股 祥 晃(ばか1名)
第 1 図
第 2 図FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram of an embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an algorithm according to the method of the present invention, and FIG.
The figure is a diagram showing tree-like data connecting causes and results of abnormalities according to a conventional method. 1... Plant, 2... Abnormal treatment determining device 3... Alarm table, 4... Knowledge base 5.
... Reasoning section, 6... Display section (8733)
Agent Patent attorney Yoshiaki Inomata (one idiot) Figure 1 Figure 2
Claims (1)
規模システムにおける自動安全保護系のインターロック
に関する知識と異常現象の物理的因果関係に関する知識
を用いて異常時のプラントデータから異常の原因−結果
を結ぶ図表を作成し、この図表によって異常の原因と異
常の現状と異常の将来の状態を推定し、対応する処置を
決定するようにしたことを特徴とするプラントの異常時
処置決定方法。Diagrams that connect the causes and effects of abnormalities from plant data during abnormalities using knowledge about the interlock of automatic safety protection systems in large-scale systems such as nuclear power plants or thermal power plants and knowledge about the physical cause and effect of abnormal phenomena. A method for deciding what to do in the event of an abnormality in a plant, characterized in that the cause of the abnormality, the current state of the abnormality, and the future state of the abnormality are estimated using this chart, and corresponding measures are determined.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP60066687A JPH06100921B2 (en) | 1985-04-01 | 1985-04-01 | How to determine the abnormal action of the plant |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP60066687A JPH06100921B2 (en) | 1985-04-01 | 1985-04-01 | How to determine the abnormal action of the plant |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPS61228501A true JPS61228501A (en) | 1986-10-11 |
JPH06100921B2 JPH06100921B2 (en) | 1994-12-12 |
Family
ID=13323091
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP60066687A Expired - Lifetime JPH06100921B2 (en) | 1985-04-01 | 1985-04-01 | How to determine the abnormal action of the plant |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH06100921B2 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS63273901A (en) * | 1987-05-02 | 1988-11-11 | Hitachi Ltd | Plant controller |
JPS6412395A (en) * | 1987-07-06 | 1989-01-17 | Toshiba Corp | Alarm processing method |
JPS6482205A (en) * | 1987-09-25 | 1989-03-28 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Plant monitoring device |
JPH01100608A (en) * | 1987-10-14 | 1989-04-18 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for assuming first cause of abnormal condition in plant operation |
JPH0217511A (en) * | 1988-07-06 | 1990-01-22 | Toshiba Corp | Plant monitoring device |
JPH02259803A (en) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-22 | Agency Of Ind Science & Technol | Plant controller |
JPH04143808A (en) * | 1990-10-05 | 1992-05-18 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Diagnostic device |
EP0643345A1 (en) * | 1993-09-02 | 1995-03-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Data processing method and device for the monitoring of the operating states of a technical plant |
US6907320B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2005-06-14 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power plant operation control system and a power plant maintaining and managing method |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS59146310A (en) * | 1983-02-09 | 1984-08-22 | Hitachi Ltd | Plant operating method |
JPS608715A (en) * | 1983-06-28 | 1985-01-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Diagnostic device of plant abnormality |
JPS6014303A (en) * | 1983-07-04 | 1985-01-24 | Hitachi Ltd | Knowledge-based diagnosis system |
-
1985
- 1985-04-01 JP JP60066687A patent/JPH06100921B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS59146310A (en) * | 1983-02-09 | 1984-08-22 | Hitachi Ltd | Plant operating method |
JPS608715A (en) * | 1983-06-28 | 1985-01-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Diagnostic device of plant abnormality |
JPS6014303A (en) * | 1983-07-04 | 1985-01-24 | Hitachi Ltd | Knowledge-based diagnosis system |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS63273901A (en) * | 1987-05-02 | 1988-11-11 | Hitachi Ltd | Plant controller |
JPS6412395A (en) * | 1987-07-06 | 1989-01-17 | Toshiba Corp | Alarm processing method |
JPS6482205A (en) * | 1987-09-25 | 1989-03-28 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Plant monitoring device |
JPH01100608A (en) * | 1987-10-14 | 1989-04-18 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for assuming first cause of abnormal condition in plant operation |
JPH0217511A (en) * | 1988-07-06 | 1990-01-22 | Toshiba Corp | Plant monitoring device |
JPH02259803A (en) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-22 | Agency Of Ind Science & Technol | Plant controller |
JPH04143808A (en) * | 1990-10-05 | 1992-05-18 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Diagnostic device |
EP0643345A1 (en) * | 1993-09-02 | 1995-03-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Data processing method and device for the monitoring of the operating states of a technical plant |
US6907320B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2005-06-14 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power plant operation control system and a power plant maintaining and managing method |
US7188004B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2007-03-06 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power plant operation control system and a power plant maintaining and managing method |
US7496429B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2009-02-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power plant operation control system and a power plant maintaining and managing method |
US8412384B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2013-04-02 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power plant operation control system and a power plant maintaining and managing method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH06100921B2 (en) | 1994-12-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JPS61228501A (en) | Method for deciding treatment of plant abnormality | |
CN110687851A (en) | Terminal operation monitoring system and method | |
CN108037387B (en) | Equipment fault analysis method and device based on clustering | |
JPH0877211A (en) | Maintenance support device for plant | |
CN110007171A (en) | The screening method and system of transformer online monitoring data false alarm | |
JPH08147030A (en) | Plant monitor device | |
JP2879631B2 (en) | Alarm suppression information creation system and alarm processing system | |
JPH0534681B2 (en) | ||
JP2019017194A (en) | System operation support device and method in electric power system, and wide area monitoring protection control system | |
CN112488458A (en) | Method and system for preventing human errors of nuclear power station digital regulations | |
JPH0217511A (en) | Plant monitoring device | |
JP2656264B2 (en) | Alarm processing diagnostic device | |
JPH0221397A (en) | Alarm processor | |
JPH11344589A (en) | Plant diagnosing system | |
JP2714623B2 (en) | Alarm control device | |
JPH07107719B2 (en) | Alarm processing method | |
JPH0353123A (en) | Plant diagnostic device | |
JPH01166199A (en) | Alarm device | |
JPH01265311A (en) | Support device for prediction of abnormality | |
JPH0814765B2 (en) | Plant monitoring method | |
JP2547837B2 (en) | Plant monitoring equipment | |
JPH0712982A (en) | Processing apparatus for alarm at plant | |
CN111176876A (en) | Fault recovery determination method, device, equipment and readable storage medium | |
JPS6252612A (en) | Diagnostic information display method | |
CN117031200A (en) | Power distribution abnormality identification method based on power grid operation big data |