JPH11314155A - Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack - Google Patents

Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack

Info

Publication number
JPH11314155A
JPH11314155A JP11965498A JP11965498A JPH11314155A JP H11314155 A JPH11314155 A JP H11314155A JP 11965498 A JP11965498 A JP 11965498A JP 11965498 A JP11965498 A JP 11965498A JP H11314155 A JPH11314155 A JP H11314155A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
arithmetic unit
weld crack
conditions
occurrence
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP11965498A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Minoru Tagami
稔 田上
Akio Tejima
秋雄 手島
Kazumichi Ono
一道 小野
Hiroshi Yamadori
浩史 山鳥
Tetsuro Okubo
哲朗 大久保
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
IHI Corp
Original Assignee
IHI Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IHI Corp filed Critical IHI Corp
Priority to JP11965498A priority Critical patent/JPH11314155A/en
Publication of JPH11314155A publication Critical patent/JPH11314155A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To enable welding operation to be efficiently performed without causing weld crack by predicting its generation in advance. SOLUTION: This method is such that the fixed conditions are varied consisting at least of a welding base material component and a wire component which are the cause of weld crack in a weld zone, that the variable conditions are also varied consisting at least of a welding current and a welding speed, and that a model is prepared for the generation of weld crack under each of these conditions and inputted preliminarily in an arithmetic unit 7. Then, the fixed conditions 8, 9 under which welding is intended at present are inputted in the arithmetic unit 7, while the variable conditions are measured in real time, with the measured signals 10, 11 inputted in the arithmetic unit 7 and compared with the models for the generation of weld crack. The generation of weld crack is thereby predictively diagnosed.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、溶接割れの予測診
断方法に関するものである。
The present invention relates to a method for predicting and diagnosing welding cracks.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】図3は溶接方法の一例であるTIG溶接
機を示したもので、TIG溶接機1と母材2とを相対移
動(図3ではTIG溶接機1を矢印X方向に移動)さ
せ、溶接トーチ3に電極4の外周を包囲するようにシー
ルドガス5を供給しつつワイヤ6の送給と電極4への給
電(電圧と電流の制御)を行いながら、溶接トーチ3の
ウィービング(図3中矢印Yで示すように移動方向Xに
対して左右の方向へ溶接トーチ3を往復移動させるこ
と)を行って溶接するようにしている。
2. Description of the Related Art FIG. 3 shows a TIG welding machine as an example of a welding method, in which a TIG welding machine 1 and a base material 2 are relatively moved (in FIG. 3, the TIG welding machine 1 is moved in the direction of arrow X). Then, while supplying the shielding gas 5 to the welding torch 3 so as to surround the outer periphery of the electrode 4 and feeding the wire 6 and supplying power to the electrode 4 (control of voltage and current), weaving of the welding torch 3 is performed. As shown by the arrow Y in FIG. 3, the welding torch 3 is reciprocated in the left and right directions with respect to the moving direction X).

【0003】上記したような溶接機によって溶接作業を
実施する際には、溶接部に溶接欠陥を生じさせないよう
に作業することが非常に重要である。
[0003] When performing a welding operation using the above-described welding machine, it is very important to perform the operation so as not to cause a welding defect in a welded portion.

【0004】一般に、溶接に当たっては、溶接電圧、溶
接電流、溶接速度、ワイヤ送給速度、ウィービング速
度、ウィービング幅、シールドガス流量等のパラメータ
を監視して適宜制御することにより、良好な溶接品質が
得られるように作業している。
In general, in welding, good welding quality can be obtained by monitoring and appropriately controlling parameters such as welding voltage, welding current, welding speed, wire feeding speed, weaving speed, weaving width, and shielding gas flow rate. Working to get it.

【0005】しかし、種々の要因によって溶接欠陥が発
生しているのが現状である。
However, at present, welding defects are generated due to various factors.

【0006】溶接欠陥としては、ビード不揃い、ビード
の大小、ビード高さの大小、ピット、酸化等の溶着金属
表面欠陥、アンダーカット、オーバーラップ等の母材と
の境界部(表面)欠陥、ポロシティ、タングステン巻込
み等の溶着金属内部欠陥、融合欠陥、溶込み不足等の母
材との境界部(内部)欠陥、及び溶接後に溶接部に発生
する溶接割れ(高温割れ及び低温割れ)等があげられ
る。
[0006] Weld defects include irregular bead, large and small bead, large and small bead height, pits, welded metal surface defects such as oxidation, undercuts, overlaps and other boundary (surface) defects with the base material, porosity. Defects in the weld metal, such as welding, tungsten inclusions, fusion defects, insufficient penetration, etc. at the boundary with the base metal (internal), and weld cracks (high-temperature cracks and low-temperature cracks) that occur in the weld after welding. Can be

【0007】従来の溶接方法において発生している溶接
割れは、溶接母材成分、ワイヤ成分、母材拘束条件、予
熱温度等の予め分っている固定条件と、溶接電流、溶接
速度、溶接電圧及びウィービング速度やシールドガス量
等の変動条件によって発生頻度が大きく変化し、そのた
めに従来は、上記した固定条件や変動条件が変更される
毎に試験溶接を実施し、溶接割れが発生しないことを確
認してから溶接作業を実施するようにしていた。
[0007] The welding cracks generated in the conventional welding method include fixed conditions such as welding base metal components, wire components, base metal restraining conditions, and preheating temperatures, welding current, welding speed, and welding voltage. In addition, the frequency of occurrence greatly changes depending on fluctuation conditions such as weaving speed and shielding gas amount.For this reason, conventionally, test welding was performed every time the above fixed conditions and fluctuation conditions were changed, and it was confirmed that welding cracks did not occur. After confirming, the welding work was performed.

【0008】[0008]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、従来の方法で
は、固定条件や変動条件が変化する度に試験溶接を実施
し、溶接割れが発生していないことを確認してから溶接
作業を行っているために、溶接作業が煩雑となって作業
能率が悪化するという問題があると共に、試験溶接のた
めに材料を無駄にしてしまうという問題を有していた。
However, in the conventional method, test welding is carried out every time the fixed condition or the fluctuating condition changes, and after confirming that no welding cracks have occurred, the welding operation is performed. Therefore, there is a problem that the welding operation is complicated and the work efficiency is deteriorated, and there is a problem that the material is wasted for the test welding.

【0009】また、溶接割れを生じさせないために、実
際には必要以上の低速度で溶接されている等の無駄が生
じており、よって作業能率が更に低下してしまうという
問題を有していた。
In addition, in order to prevent the occurrence of welding cracks, there is a problem that welding is actually performed at an unnecessarily low speed or the like, and the working efficiency is further reduced. .

【0010】更に、前記変動条件が溶接作業中に変化し
てしまったような場合には、溶接割れ製品が大量に製造
されてしまうという問題があった。
[0010] Further, when the above-mentioned fluctuation conditions change during the welding operation, there is a problem that a large number of weld cracked products are produced.

【0011】本発明は、かかる従来の問題点を解決すべ
くなしたもので、溶接割れの発生を事前に予測して、溶
接割れを生じさせないで溶接作業を能率的に行えるよう
にした溶接割れの予測診断方法を提供することを目的と
している。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the conventional problems, and it is intended to predict the occurrence of welding cracks in advance and to perform welding work efficiently without causing welding cracks. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a predictive diagnosis method.

【0012】[0012]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、溶接部に溶接
割れを生じる要因である少なくとも溶接母材成分、ワイ
ヤ成分からなる固定条件を変化させると共に、少なくと
も溶接電流及び溶接速度からなる変動条件を変化させ
て、各条件下での溶接割れ発生のモデルを作って演算装
置に予め入力しておき、現在溶接しようとする固定条件
を演算装置に入力し、且つ前記変動条件をリアルタイム
で計測してその計測信号を前記演算装置に入力して前記
溶接割れ発生のモデルと比較することにより溶接割れの
発生を予測診断することを特徴とする溶接割れの予測診
断方法、に係るものである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to the present invention, a fixing condition comprising at least a welding base metal component and a wire component, which is a factor of causing a welding crack in a weld, is changed, and at least a fluctuating condition comprising a welding current and a welding speed. Is changed, a model of the occurrence of welding cracks under each condition is created and input to the arithmetic device in advance, the current fixed condition to be welded is input to the arithmetic device, and the fluctuation condition is measured in real time. And a method for predicting and diagnosing the occurrence of weld cracks by inputting the measurement signal to the arithmetic unit and comparing the measured signal with the model for the occurrence of weld cracks.

【0013】上記手段では、溶接を安定して行うことが
できる。
According to the above means, welding can be performed stably.

【0014】[0014]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の好適な実施の形態
例を図面を参照して説明する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

【0015】図1は本発明の方法を実施する制御ブロッ
クの一例を示したもので、溶接部に溶接割れを生じる要
因である少なくとも溶接母材成分、ワイヤ成分(必要な
場合には予熱温度を含む)からなる固定条件を変化させ
ると共に、少なくとも溶接電流及び溶接速度からなる変
動条件を変化させた複数の試験溶接を実施し、その各条
件を演算装置7に入力すると共に、各条件下での溶接割
れ発生のモデルを作って演算装置7に記憶させておく。
FIG. 1 shows an example of a control block for carrying out the method of the present invention. The control block includes at least a welding base metal component and a wire component (if necessary, the preheating temperature is a factor that causes a weld crack in a welded portion). ), And a plurality of test weldings in which at least the fluctuation conditions consisting of the welding current and the welding speed are changed are performed. A model of welding crack occurrence is created and stored in the arithmetic unit 7.

【0016】前記固定条件としては、溶接割れ発生に大
きな影響を及ぼす溶接母材成分とワイヤ成分は必ず用い
るようにし、この他にも予熱温度、母材拘束条件等を用
いるようにしてもよい。
As the fixing condition, a welding base metal component and a wire component which have a great influence on the occurrence of welding cracks are always used, and in addition, a preheating temperature, a base material constraint condition, and the like may be used.

【0017】また、変動条件としては、溶接割れ発生に
大きな影響を及ぼす溶接電流と溶接速度は必ず用いるよ
うにし、この他にも溶接電圧、ウィービング速度及びシ
ールドガス量等を用いるようにしてもよい。
As the fluctuation conditions, a welding current and a welding speed which greatly affect the occurrence of welding cracks are always used, and in addition, a welding voltage, a weaving speed, a shielding gas amount and the like may be used. .

【0018】溶接作業を実施するに当たっては、現在溶
接しようとする固定条件である例えば溶接母材成分8と
ワイヤ成分9とを演算装置7に入力し、更に溶接機1の
変動条件である例えば溶接電流と溶接速度とをリアルタ
イムで計測してその溶接電流の計測信号10と溶接速度
の計測信号11を前記演算装置7に入力する。
At the time of carrying out the welding operation, for example, the welding base metal component 8 and the wire component 9 which are the fixed conditions to be welded are input to the arithmetic unit 7, and further, the welding condition which is the variation condition of the welding machine 1, for example, The current and the welding speed are measured in real time, and the measurement signal 10 of the welding current and the measurement signal 11 of the welding speed are input to the arithmetic unit 7.

【0019】演算装置7は、入力された固定条件である
溶接母材成分8及びワイヤ成分9と、変動条件である溶
接電流の計測信号10及び溶接速度の計測信号11とに
よる溶接条件を、演算装置7に予め入力されて記憶され
ている溶接割れ発生のモデルと比較し、この比較によっ
て溶接割れの発生を予測診断する。
The arithmetic unit 7 calculates welding conditions based on the welding base metal component 8 and the wire component 9 which are input fixed conditions and the welding current measurement signal 10 and welding speed measurement signal 11 which are variable conditions. The model is compared with a model of welding crack occurrence which is input and stored in the device 7 in advance, and the occurrence of welding crack is predicted and diagnosed by this comparison.

【0020】演算装置7で予測診断された診断信号12
は、表示或いは警報を行う表示器13に出力される。
The diagnostic signal 12 predicted and diagnosed by the arithmetic unit 7
Is output to the display 13 for displaying or warning.

【0021】また、前記診断信号12を溶接機1に出力
して、前記予測診断結果に応じて溶接割れが生じないよ
うに前記変動条件である溶接電流と溶接速度を自動的に
調節させる制御を行うようにしてもよい。
Further, a control for outputting the diagnostic signal 12 to the welding machine 1 and automatically adjusting the welding current and the welding speed, which are the above-mentioned fluctuation conditions, so as not to cause welding cracks in accordance with the predicted diagnosis result is performed. It may be performed.

【0022】図2は前記溶接割れ発生のモデルの一例を
示したグラフであり、D347(ステンレス)における
入熱を変化させた時の割れ率を試験したグラフである。
FIG. 2 is a graph showing an example of the model of the occurrence of welding cracks, and is a graph in which the crack rate when heat input was changed in D347 (stainless steel) was tested.

【0023】図2によれば、入熱が0.4(A/mm/
min)の時割れ率が95%となり、入熱が0.9以上
では割れ率は20%まで減少した。これは、入熱の減少
による高温割れである。
According to FIG. 2, the heat input is 0.4 (A / mm /
min), the cracking rate was 95%, and when the heat input was 0.9 or more, the cracking rate was reduced to 20%. This is hot cracking due to reduced heat input.

【0024】また、溶接電圧を変化させた場合にも、前
記溶接電流の場合と同様に所定電圧以上になると溶接割
れが生じることが知られている。
It is also known that, even when the welding voltage is changed, a welding crack occurs when the voltage exceeds a predetermined voltage, as in the case of the welding current.

【0025】前記したように、固定条件と変動条件を種
々変化させることによって得た割れ発生のモデルを演算
装置に入力しておき、少なくとも溶接母材成分及びワイ
ヤ成分と、少なくとも溶接電流及び溶接速度の計測信号
とを演算装置に入力して、前記演算装置に記憶された溶
接割れ発生のモデルと比較することにより、溶接割れの
発生を予測診断するようにしているので、高い精度で溶
接割れの発生を予測診断することができ、よって変動条
件を修正して、最も作業能率が高い溶接条件で溶接割れ
を生じさせることなく溶接作業を実施できる。
As described above, a model of crack generation obtained by variously changing the fixed condition and the fluctuating condition is input to the arithmetic unit, and at least the welding base metal component and the wire component, and at least the welding current and the welding speed are obtained. By inputting the measurement signal of the above to the arithmetic unit and comparing it with the model of the occurrence of weld cracks stored in the arithmetic unit, the occurrence of weld cracks is predicted and diagnosed. The occurrence can be predicted and diagnosed, so that the fluctuating condition can be corrected and the welding operation can be performed under the welding condition with the highest operation efficiency without causing the welding crack.

【0026】[0026]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、固定条件と変動条件を
種々変化させることによって得た割れ発生のモデルを演
算装置に入力しておき、少なくとも溶接母材成分及びワ
イヤ成分と、少なくとも溶接電流及び溶接速度の計測信
号とを演算装置に入力して、前記演算装置に記憶された
溶接割れ発生のモデルと比較することにより、溶接割れ
の発生を予測診断するようにしているので、高い精度で
溶接割れの発生を予測診断することができ、よって変動
条件を修正して、最も作業能率が高い溶接条件で溶接割
れを生じさせることなく溶接作業を実施することができ
るという優れた効果を奏し得る。
According to the present invention, a crack generation model obtained by variously changing the fixed condition and the variable condition is input to an arithmetic unit, and at least the welding base metal component and the wire component, and at least the welding current By inputting the measurement signal of the welding speed and the calculation device to the arithmetic device and comparing it with the model of the occurrence of welding cracks stored in the arithmetic device, the occurrence of welding cracks is predicted and diagnosed, so that the accuracy is high. It is possible to predict and diagnose the occurrence of welding cracks, and thus to achieve an excellent effect that the welding operation can be performed without causing welding cracks under the welding conditions with the highest operating efficiency by correcting the fluctuation conditions. .

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の溶接割れの予測診断方法を実施するた
めの制御ブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a control block diagram for implementing a method for predicting and diagnosing welding cracks according to the present invention.

【図2】溶接割れ発生のモデルの一例を示すグラフであ
る。
FIG. 2 is a graph showing an example of a model of welding crack occurrence.

【図3】TIG溶接機の一例を示す概略断面図である。FIG. 3 is a schematic sectional view showing an example of a TIG welding machine.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

7 演算装置 8 溶接母材成分(固定条件) 9 ワイヤ成分(固定条件) 10 溶接電流の計測信号(変動条件) 11 溶接速度の計測信号(変動条件) 7 arithmetic unit 8 welding base metal component (fixed condition) 9 wire component (fixed condition) 10 measurement signal of welding current (variation condition) 11 measurement signal of welding speed (variation condition)

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 山鳥 浩史 神奈川県横浜市磯子区新中原町1番地 石 川島播磨重工業株式会社横浜第一工場内 (72)発明者 大久保 哲朗 神奈川県横浜市磯子区新中原町1番地 石 川島播磨重工業株式会社横浜エンジニアリ ングセンター内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Hirofumi Yamatori 1st Shin-Nakahara-cho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa Ishikawashima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. 1 Nakaharacho Ishi Kawashima Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. Yokohama Engineering Center

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 溶接部に溶接割れを生じる要因である少
なくとも溶接母材成分、ワイヤ成分からなる固定条件を
変化させると共に、少なくとも溶接電流及び溶接速度か
らなる変動条件を変化させて、各条件下での溶接割れ発
生のモデルを作って演算装置に予め入力しておき、現在
溶接しようとする固定条件を演算装置に入力し、且つ前
記変動条件をリアルタイムで計測してその計測信号を前
記演算装置に入力して前記溶接割れ発生のモデルと比較
することにより溶接割れの発生を予測診断することを特
徴とする溶接割れの予測診断方法。
At least one of the following conditions: a fixing condition comprising at least a welding base metal component and a wire component, which are factors that cause welding cracks in a welded portion; A model of the occurrence of welding cracks is created in advance and input to the arithmetic unit in advance, the current fixed conditions to be welded are input to the arithmetic unit, and the fluctuation condition is measured in real time, and the measurement signal is sent to the arithmetic unit. And predicting and diagnosing the occurrence of a weld crack by comparing the model with the model for the occurrence of a weld crack.
JP11965498A 1998-04-28 1998-04-28 Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack Pending JPH11314155A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11965498A JPH11314155A (en) 1998-04-28 1998-04-28 Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11965498A JPH11314155A (en) 1998-04-28 1998-04-28 Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11314155A true JPH11314155A (en) 1999-11-16

Family

ID=14766790

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP11965498A Pending JPH11314155A (en) 1998-04-28 1998-04-28 Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH11314155A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012192431A (en) * 2011-03-16 2012-10-11 Daihen Corp Welding equipment
CN103105477A (en) * 2013-01-23 2013-05-15 太原科技大学 Method for predicting forge crack initiation of forged steel
WO2014181458A1 (en) * 2013-05-10 2014-11-13 株式会社日立製作所 Welding method, welding system, and system for monitoring weld solidification cracking
JP2018153868A (en) * 2017-03-17 2018-10-04 リンカーン グローバル,インコーポレイテッド System and method for positive metal identification and intelligent consumable identification

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012192431A (en) * 2011-03-16 2012-10-11 Daihen Corp Welding equipment
CN103105477A (en) * 2013-01-23 2013-05-15 太原科技大学 Method for predicting forge crack initiation of forged steel
CN103105477B (en) * 2013-01-23 2015-02-04 太原科技大学 Method for predicting forge crack initiation of forged steel
WO2014181458A1 (en) * 2013-05-10 2014-11-13 株式会社日立製作所 Welding method, welding system, and system for monitoring weld solidification cracking
JP6012855B2 (en) * 2013-05-10 2016-10-25 株式会社日立製作所 Welding method, welding system, and weld solidification cracking monitoring system
EP2995416A4 (en) * 2013-05-10 2017-01-18 Hitachi, Ltd. Welding method, welding system, and system for monitoring weld solidification cracking
JP2018153868A (en) * 2017-03-17 2018-10-04 リンカーン グローバル,インコーポレイテッド System and method for positive metal identification and intelligent consumable identification

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6376801B1 (en) Gas turbine component refurbishment apparatus and repair method
JP7316573B2 (en) Welding system and work welding method using the same
EP4169659A1 (en) Defect occurrence prediction method, and defect occurrence prediction device
CN102107314A (en) Method for overlaying wear-resistant layer of blade shroud of turbine working blade
CN105842034A (en) Crack defect test piece manufacturing method
KR101447955B1 (en) Method or evaluating welding quality of spot welding and record media recorded program for implement thereof
Thomas Analyzing the failure of welded steel components in construction systems
JPH1080767A (en) Method for repairing gas turbine blade, its repairing device, and gas turbine blade
JPH11314155A (en) Predictive diagnostic method of weld crack
French et al. Transfer analysis of human engineering skills for adaptive robotic additive manufacturing in the aerospace repair and overhaul industry
Mahapatra et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis to predict the effects of shielded metal arc welding process parameters on temperature distributions and weldment zones in butt and one-sided fillet welds
Madesh et al. Multi-layer additive manufacturing on nickel-based superalloy by optimization of pulsed mode process parameters of single-layer bead geometry
JP2014144468A (en) Welding quality guaranteeing device and welding quality guaranteeing method
KR101444245B1 (en) Vehicle welding inspection system and vehicle welding inspection method
JP2008114228A (en) Laser beam machine
US4859830A (en) Method of determining the weldability of a part
JP6672551B2 (en) Display device and display method for arc welding
JP3367227B2 (en) Automatic welding equipment
JPH0976062A (en) First layer welding method
US20210302934A1 (en) Methods and systems using data logging power supply for improved welding and heating
Hamjah Optimization of new semi-automatic TIG welding process for surface quality through Taguchi method
Wirani et al. Application of The FMEA Method to Know The Factors Causing Weld Defects in The Boiler Fabrication Process
CN114002391B (en) Method and device for evaluating solidification crack sensitivity of welding filling material
Krishna et al. Numerical Analysis on the effect of welding parameters in TIG welding for INCONEL 625 alloy
Lowden et al. Integrated weld automation for gas turbine blades

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20041102

A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20061214

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20061226

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070216

A02 Decision of refusal

Effective date: 20070904

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02