JPH11170244A - Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc. - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc.

Info

Publication number
JPH11170244A
JPH11170244A JP36221497A JP36221497A JPH11170244A JP H11170244 A JPH11170244 A JP H11170244A JP 36221497 A JP36221497 A JP 36221497A JP 36221497 A JP36221497 A JP 36221497A JP H11170244 A JPH11170244 A JP H11170244A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
target performance
amount
trial
displayed
concrete
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP36221497A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Takefumi Shindou
竹文 新藤
Atsushi Sakamoto
淳 坂本
Kenji Yokoi
謙二 横井
Yasunori Matsuoka
康訓 松岡
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Taisei Corp
Original Assignee
Taisei Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Taisei Corp filed Critical Taisei Corp
Priority to JP36221497A priority Critical patent/JPH11170244A/en
Publication of JPH11170244A publication Critical patent/JPH11170244A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To design a formulation easily and precisely by a method in which when the quality variation of a material is input in a practical plant and the results of trial kneading fall in a quality variation range, the quality after curing is compared with aimed performance, and when the quality is in the range of the aimed performance, the formulation is displayed. SOLUTION: Quality variation which affects the properties of a material, especially flesh concrete, used in a plant means the quantity of the surface water of fine aggregate. On the basis of the amplitude of the quality variation, a formulation is further corrected. The quantity of unit water, the addition of a separation reducing agent, the quantity of unit powder, the quantity of unit aggregate, and others are corrected. Trial kneading is repeated according to the correction, a formulation which meets all conditions is determined. When the results of comparison do not meet aimed strength, the kind and mixing ratio of the powder to be used again are changed. When the formulation meets all kinds of aimed performance, it is displayed.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、高流動性コンクリ
ートなどの配合設計選定方法と装置に関するものであ
る。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for selecting a mixing design of highly fluid concrete or the like.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】コンクリートなどはフレッシュ時には流
動性、充填性など、硬化後には強度、発熱特性、耐久性
などが一定の条件を満たすものでなければならない。そ
のような条件も満たす配合を設計するために、設計式が
開発されている。しかし実際には不確定な要素が多く、
計算式通りに満足できる品質を得ることは困難である。
そのために標準配合を仮に決定し、その配合にしたがっ
て試し練りを行ない、目標性能に合致するか否かを判断
している。
2. Description of the Related Art Concrete and the like must satisfy certain conditions such as fluidity and filling property at the time of freshness and strength, heat generation property and durability after hardening. Design equations have been developed to design formulations that also meet such conditions. However, there are many uncertainties in practice,
It is difficult to obtain satisfactory quality as calculated.
For this purpose, a standard blend is temporarily determined, and trial kneading is performed according to the blend to determine whether or not the target performance is met.

【0003】[0003]

【本発明が解決しようとする課題】その場合に多数回の
思考錯誤を繰り返す必要があるが、結果が不満足であっ
た場合に次にはどの項目を増やせば良いのか、あるいは
どの項目を減らせば良いのかは、専門的な技術者の勘や
熟練に頼っており、なおかつ得られた結果の精度も低い
のが現状である。
[Problems to be solved by the invention] In that case, it is necessary to repeat thought and error many times, but if the result is unsatisfactory, which item should be increased next or which item should be decreased? Whether it is good depends on the intuition and skill of a professional engineer, and the accuracy of the obtained result is low at present.

【0004】本発明は上記したような従来の問題を解決
するためになされたもので、勘や熟練をあまり必要とせ
ずに、すべての目標性能を満足する高流動性コンクリー
トなどの配合を容易にかつ精度良く設計できる、高流動
性コンクリートなどの配合設計選定方法と装置を提供す
ることを目的とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned conventional problems, and does not require much intuition and skill, and can easily mix high-fluidity concretes and the like which satisfy all target performances. An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for selecting a blending design of highly fluid concrete or the like, which can be designed with high accuracy.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記のような目的を達成
するために、本発明の高流動性コンクリートなどの配合
設計選定方法は、コンクリートなど構造物の条件を入力
し、コンクリートなどの目標とする性能を決定して表示
し、粗骨材の寸法や量、粉体の種類や量、単位水量、細
骨材の量、混和剤の量などの配合設定範囲を表示し、表
示された設定範囲にしたがって設定値を入力し、以上の
入力結果から、標準配合を決定して表示し、この標準配
合に基づいて行なった試し練りの結果と、目標性能とを
比較し、試し練りの結果と目標性能が一致しない場合
に、補正すべき項目の増減を補正項目テーブルから選択
して表示し、表示された補正項目にしたがって再度配合
条件を入力し、再度決定した配合条件に基づく試し練り
の結果と、目標性能とを比較し、試し練りの結果が目標
性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、実際のプラントにおける
材料の品質変動を入力し、試し練りの結果が品質変動の
範囲に含まれる場合に、硬化後の品質と目標性能とを比
較し、試し練りした結果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場
合に、その配合を表示することを特徴とする、高流動性
コンクリートなどの配合設計選定方法を特徴としたもの
である。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve the above object, a method for selecting a blending design of high fluidity concrete or the like according to the present invention comprises inputting conditions of a structure such as concrete and setting a target of concrete or the like. Determine and display the performance to be performed, and display the mixing setting range such as the size and amount of coarse aggregate, the type and amount of powder, the unit water amount, the amount of fine aggregate, the amount of admixture, and the displayed settings Enter the set values according to the range, determine and display the standard mix from the above input results, compare the results of the trial kneading performed based on this standard formulation with the target performance, and When the target performances do not match, the increase or decrease of the item to be corrected is selected and displayed from the correction item table, the blending conditions are input again according to the displayed correction item, and the result of the trial kneading based on the determined blending condition again. And target performance If the result of trial mixing is within the range of the target performance, enter the quality variation of the material in the actual plant.If the result of trial mixing is within the range of the quality variation, And the target performance is compared, and when the result of trial kneading is within the range of the target performance, the composition is displayed, and the method of selecting the composition design of high-fluid concrete is characterized. is there.

【0006】さらに本発明の高流動性コンクリートなど
の配合設計装置は、コンクリートなど構造物の条件を入
力する手段と、コンクリートなどの目標とする性能を決
定して表示する手段と、粗骨材の寸法や量、粉体の種類
や量、単位水量、細骨材の量、混和剤の量などの配合設
定範囲を表示し、表示された設定範囲にしたがって設定
値を入力する手段と、以上の入力結果から、標準配合を
決定して表示する手段と、この標準配合に基づいて行な
った試し練りの結果と、目標性能とを比較する手段と、
試し練りの結果と目標性能が一致しない場合に、補正す
べき項目の増減を補正項目テーブルから選択して表示す
る手段と、表示された補正項目にしたがって再度配合条
件を入力する手段と、再度決定した配合条件に基づく試
し練りの結果と、目標性能とを比較する手段と、試し練
りの結果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、実際のプ
ラントにおける材料の品質変動を入力する手段と、試し
練りの結果が品質変動の範囲に含まれる場合に、硬化後
の品質と目標性能とを比較する手段と、試し練りした結
果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、その配合を表示
する手段より構成した、高流動性コンクリートなどの配
合設計装置を特徴としたものである。
[0006] Further, the mixing and designing apparatus for high-fluidity concrete of the present invention comprises means for inputting the condition of a structure such as concrete, means for determining and displaying a target performance of concrete or the like, A means for displaying a blending setting range such as dimensions and amount, powder type and amount, unit water amount, fine aggregate amount, admixture amount and the like, and inputting set values according to the displayed setting range, A means for determining and displaying a standard blend from the input result, a means for comparing the result of the trial kneading performed based on the standard blend with the target performance,
When the result of the trial kneading does not match the target performance, a means for selecting and displaying the increase or decrease of the item to be corrected from the correction item table, and a means for inputting the blending condition again in accordance with the displayed correction item, are determined again. Means for comparing the result of the trial kneading based on the blending conditions obtained with the target performance with the means for inputting the quality variation of the material in the actual plant when the result of the trial kneading is within the range of the target performance; When the result of kneading is included in the range of quality fluctuation, the means for comparing the quality after curing and the target performance, and when the result of trial kneading is included in the range of target performance, from the means for displaying the composition thereof It is characterized by a compounding and designing device for high fluidity concrete and the like.

【0007】[0007]

【本発明の実施の態様】以下図面を参照しながら本発明
の配合設計選定方法と装置の実施例をコンクリートを例
として説明する。全体のフローを表1に示し、以下で各
段階での作業を説明する。なおセメント以外に高炉スラ
グ微粉末やフライアッシュを使用した材料においても同
様の入力、演算、表示装置を使用して設計することがで
きる。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments of the method and apparatus for selecting a blending design according to the present invention will be described below with reference to concrete, with reference to the drawings. The overall flow is shown in Table 1, and the operation at each stage will be described below. It should be noted that a material using blast furnace slag fine powder or fly ash other than cement can be designed using similar input, calculation and display devices.

【0008】[0008]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0009】<イ>構造物条件入力手段。 まず、施工の対象とする構造物の条件をコンピュータに
入力する。例えば、配筋などの補強材の密度は高密度か
低密度か、型枠の形状は複雑か単純か、複合構造物か通
常のRC構造物か、あるいは無筋構造物か、補強材が少
ないか、マスコンクリートか、といった構造物ごとに異
なる条件である。さらに、構築すべきコンクリート構造
物によって次のような条件が異なる。例えば鉄筋の間
隔、鋼材の使用量、コンクリートの最長流動距離、コン
クリートの流動時の勾配、ポンプによる押し上げ高さ、
ポンプ圧送距離、型枠の形状の難易度、などである。こ
うした条件を入力し、その結果を表2に示すように例え
ば3段階に分類する。
<A> Structure condition input means. First, conditions of a structure to be constructed are input to a computer. For example, the density of reinforcements such as reinforcement is high or low density, the form of the form is complicated or simple, composite or ordinary RC structure, or unreinforced structure, less reinforcement The conditions are different for each structure such as mass concrete. Further, the following conditions differ depending on the concrete structure to be constructed. For example, the spacing of rebars, the amount of steel used, the longest flow distance of concrete, the gradient during concrete flow, the pumping height,
Pumping distance, difficulty of the shape of the mold, and the like. These conditions are input, and the results are classified into, for example, three stages as shown in Table 2.

【0010】[0010]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0011】<ロ>目標性能表示手段。 上記の条件入力によって、コンクリートの目標とする性
能を分類し、表示する。 フレッシュ時の目標性能とし
ては、流動性(スランプフロー値)、充填性(U型充填
高さ)、分離抵抗性(フロー50cm到達時間)などを
あげることができる。ここにU型充填高さとは、U字状
に形成した所定の寸法の筒体の一方にコンクリートを充
填し、U字状の他方の筒体に上昇してきたコンクリート
の高さを測定して充填性を判断するテスト方法である。
硬化後の目標性能としては、強度、発熱特性、耐久性な
どをあげることができる。
<B> Target performance display means. The target performance of the concrete is classified and displayed based on the above condition input. As the target performance at the time of freshness, fluidity (slump flow value), filling property (U-shaped filling height), separation resistance (flow reaching 50 cm) and the like can be mentioned. Here, the U-shaped filling height means that concrete is filled in one of a U-shaped cylindrical body of a predetermined size, and the height of the concrete that has risen in the other U-shaped cylindrical body is measured and filled. This is a test method to determine gender.
The target performance after curing includes strength, heat generation characteristics, durability, and the like.

【0012】<ハ>配合条件入力手段。 上記の条件入力によって区分した3ランクに応じて次の
配合条件を割り当てておく。粗骨材の最大寸法、単位粗
骨材容積、粉体の種類(ポルトランドセメント、高炉ス
ラグ微粉末、フライアッシュなど)に応じた単位粉体
量、単位水量、単位細骨材容積、細骨材率である。この
ように前記の構造物条件と目標性能によって分類された
ランクにしたがって配合条件は定めてあるから、表3、
4、5、6に示すようにそのままの数値を当てはめてゆ
けばよく、作業はきわめて簡単である。
<C> Mixing condition input means. The following compounding conditions are assigned according to the three ranks classified by the above condition input. Maximum size of coarse aggregate, unit coarse aggregate volume, unit powder amount according to powder type (Portland cement, blast furnace slag fine powder, fly ash, etc.), unit water amount, unit fine aggregate volume, fine aggregate Rate. As described above, the blending conditions are determined according to the ranks classified according to the structural conditions and the target performance.
As shown in 4, 5, and 6, it is sufficient to apply numerical values as they are, and the operation is extremely simple.

【0013】[0013]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0014】[0014]

【表4】 [Table 4]

【0015】[0015]

【表5】 [Table 5]

【0016】[0016]

【表6】 [Table 6]

【0017】次に混和剤(高性能減水剤、分離低減剤、
AE助剤など)の種類、その量を設定するが、この量は
前記した他の材料の種類、量を考慮して製造メーカーの
示す使用範囲内で設定する。
Next, an admixture (a high-performance water reducing agent, a separation reducing agent,
AE auxiliary agent) and the amount thereof are set, and this amount is set within the use range indicated by the manufacturer in consideration of the types and amounts of the other materials described above.

【0018】<ニ>標準配合表示手段。 以上の経過によって標準配合を仮に決定して表示する。<D> Standard composition display means. With the above process, the standard combination is temporarily determined and displayed.

【0019】<ホ>比較手段。 表示手段において表示された標準配合に基づいて試し練
りを行なう。そして試し練りの結果をフレッシュ時の目
標性能と比較するが、試し練りの結果が一度で目標性能
と一致することは少ない。
<E> Comparison means. Trial kneading is performed based on the standard mixture displayed on the display means. Then, the result of the trial kneading is compared with the target performance at the time of freshness, but the result of the trial kneading rarely coincides with the target performance at one time.

【0020】<ヘ>補正項目表示手段。 試し練りの結果と目標性能が一致しない場合には、配合
を補正しなければならない。しかし前記したように従来
はこの補正手段が熟練した技術者の経験や勘にたよって
いた。しかし本発明の手段では表7に示すようなテーブ
ルから選択して補正すべき項目を、その増減記号ととも
に表示することができる。
<F> Correction item display means. If the results of trial kneading do not match the target performance, the blending must be corrected. However, as described above, this correction means has conventionally been based on the experience and intuition of a skilled engineer. However, in the means of the present invention, items to be selected and corrected from a table as shown in Table 7 can be displayed together with the increase / decrease symbols.

【0021】[0021]

【表7】 [Table 7]

【0022】したがって、経験や勘に頼ることなく、補
正すべき項目とその増減をただちに決定することができ
る。
Therefore, the item to be corrected and its increase / decrease can be immediately determined without depending on experience or intuition.

【0023】<ト>配合条件調整手段。 表示された補正項目にしたがって再度配合条件を調整す
る。その場合に補正項目とその増減が分かっているか
ら、調整作業はきわめて容易である。こうして増減、調
整した後の配合条件に基づいて再度試し練りを行ない、
その結果と目標性能とを比較する。そして再び指示され
た補正項目にしたがって再度配合条件を調整し、徐々に
目標条件に収斂させてゆく。
<G> Means for adjusting blending conditions. The blending conditions are adjusted again according to the displayed correction items. In this case, since the correction item and its increase / decrease are known, the adjustment operation is extremely easy. In this way, trial kneading is performed again based on the blending conditions after the increase, decrease, and adjustment,
The result is compared with the target performance. Then, the blending conditions are adjusted again according to the instructed correction items, and gradually converge to the target conditions.

【0024】<チ>品質変動条件入力手段。 こうして所定の値に収斂したら、次には実際のプラント
で使用する材料の品質変動の条件を入力する。プラント
で使用する材料で特にフレッシュコンクリートの特性に
影響を与える品質の変動とは、細骨材の表面水の量であ
る。このような品質の変動の幅のデータをもとに、さら
に配合を修正する。その場合には、単位水量、分離低減
剤の添加量、単位粉体量、単位粗骨材量などの修正を行
なう。この修正にしたがって再度試し練りを行ない、前
記と同様な比較、修正を行ない、すべての条件を満たす
配合を決定する。
<H> Quality fluctuation condition input means. After the convergence to the predetermined value, the conditions for the quality fluctuation of the materials used in the actual plant are input. The quality variation that affects the properties of fresh concrete, especially in the materials used in the plant, is the amount of surface water of the fine aggregate. Based on the data of the range of such quality fluctuation, the composition is further modified. In this case, the unit water amount, the amount of the separation reducing agent added, the unit powder amount, the unit coarse aggregate amount and the like are corrected. A trial kneading is performed again in accordance with this correction, and the same comparison and correction as described above are performed to determine a composition satisfying all conditions.

【0025】<リ>硬化後の品質比較手段。 以上の条件を満たす配合で練った高流動性コンクリート
は目標とした強度を満たしているはずである。その点を
確認するために所定の期間を経過したサンプルに圧縮
力、引張力などを与えるテストを行ない、硬化後の品質
と目標性能とを比較する。もし比較した結果が目標とす
る強度を満たしていない場合には、再度使用する粉体の
種類や混合比率を変更するなどの配合の修正を行ない、
前記の過程に説明した粗骨材の最大寸法、単位粗骨材容
積などの設定からやり直す。こうしてフレッシュ時、お
よび硬化後のすべての目標性能を満たした場合に、その
配合を表示する。
<Re> Means for comparing quality after curing. A high-fluidity concrete kneaded with a composition satisfying the above conditions should satisfy the target strength. In order to confirm this point, a test for applying a compressive force, a tensile force, or the like to the sample after a predetermined period is performed, and the quality after curing is compared with the target performance. If the result of the comparison does not meet the target strength, correct the formulation such as changing the type and mixing ratio of the powder to be used again,
The process is repeated from the setting of the maximum size of the coarse aggregate and the unit coarse aggregate volume described in the above process. The composition is indicated when fresh and when all target performances after curing are satisfied.

【0026】[0026]

【実施例】次に配合修正の実施例を説明する。EXAMPLES Next, examples of modifying the composition will be described.

【0027】<イ>目標性能に収斂するための修正。 表8において、配合選定の経験を持たない技術者が、前
記した修正表(表7)を使用して徐々に所定の配当に収
斂させた経過を示す。
<A> Correction to converge to the target performance. Table 8 shows a process in which a technician who has no experience in selecting a blend gradually converges to a predetermined payout using the above-described correction table (Table 7).

【0028】[0028]

【表8】 [Table 8]

【0029】例えば第1回目の配合は、流動性が目標範
囲よりも大きく、分離抵抗性は目標範囲未満であり、充
填性も目標値未満であった。その場合には表7の修正N
o.12に該当する。したがって、補正項目のその欄に
示す通り、まず減水剤の添加量を減らし、次に単位水量
を減らし、単位粉体量を減らし、最後に単位粗骨材量を
減らす。そうして仮定した配合で試験を行なったとこ
ろ、表8の第2回に示す結果がえられた。その結果は修
正表7の修正No.14に相当するものであった。こう
して実施例の場合は10回の試験練りを行なって、フレ
ッシュ時の目標性能を得ることができた。
For example, in the first blending, the fluidity was higher than the target range, the separation resistance was lower than the target range, and the filling property was lower than the target value. In that case, the modified N in Table 7
o. This corresponds to 12. Therefore, as shown in the column of the correction item, first, the amount of the water reducing agent added is reduced, then the unit water amount is reduced, the unit powder amount is reduced, and finally, the unit coarse aggregate amount is reduced. When a test was conducted using the thus assumed composition, the results shown in the second part of Table 8 were obtained. The results are shown in Correction No. It was equivalent to 14. Thus, in the case of the example, the test kneading was performed ten times, and the target performance at the time of freshness could be obtained.

【0030】<ロ>プラントでの品質変動による修正。 目標とする性能を得ることができた配合に対して、さら
にプラントの骨材の表面水の変動を考慮した修正を行な
った。その結果を表9の配合No,11、12に示す。
<B> Correction due to quality fluctuation at the plant. The formulation that achieved the target performance was further modified taking into account the fluctuations in the surface water of the aggregate of the plant. The results are shown in Formulation Nos. 11, 12 in Table 9.

【0031】[0031]

【表9】 [Table 9]

【0032】<ハ>再度の配合修正。 以上の結果から配合No.10を基に、再度配合修正を
行なった結果を表10に示す。こうして配合No.14
の条件で配合を決定した。
<C> Correction of compounding again. From the above results, Formulation No. Table 10 shows the results of the compounding correction performed again based on No. 10. Thus, the mixture No. 14
Was determined under the following conditions.

【0033】[0033]

【表10】 [Table 10]

【0034】[0034]

【本発明の効果】本発明の高流動性コンクリートなどの
配合設計選定方法と装置は以上説明したように、配合修
正表を使用して試し練りした後の補正項目、およびその
増減の条件を明確にした。そのために熟練、経験のない
者でも、修正の順序、方向が明確になり無駄な思考錯誤
を繰り返すことなく、効率的にかつ精度良く目標値に収
斂させることができるようになった。
As described above, the method and apparatus for selecting the composition of high-fluidity concrete according to the present invention, as described above, clarify the correction items after trial kneading using the composition correction table and the conditions for increasing and decreasing the correction items. I made it. For this reason, even a person with no skill or experience can clarify the order and direction of correction, and can efficiently and accurately converge to the target value without repeating unnecessary thinking and error.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 松岡 康訓 東京都新宿区西新宿一丁目25番1号 大成 建設株式会社内 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuing from the front page (72) Inventor Yasunori Matsuoka 1-25-1, Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Taisei Corporation

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】コンクリートなど構造物の条件を入力し、 コンクリートなどの目標とする性能を決定して表示し、 粗骨材の寸法や量、粉体の種類や量、単位水量、細骨材
の量、混和剤の量などの配合設定範囲を表示し、 表示された設定範囲にしたがって設定値を入力し、 以上の入力結果から、標準配合を決定して表示し、 この標準配合に基づいて行なった試し練りの結果と、目
標性能とを比較し、 試し練りの結果と目標性能が一致しない場合に、補正す
べき項目の増減を補正項目テーブルから選択して表示
し、 表示された補正項目にしたがって再度配合条件を入力
し、 再度決定した配合条件に基づく試し練りの結果と、目標
性能とを比較し、 試し練りの結果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、実
際のプラントにおける材料の品質変動を入力し、 試し練りの結果が品質変動の範囲に含まれる場合に、硬
化後の品質と目標性能とを比較し、 試し練りした結果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、
その配合を表示することを特徴とする、 高流動性コンクリートなどの配合設計選定方法。
1. The condition of a structure such as concrete is input, and the target performance of concrete or the like is determined and displayed. The size and amount of coarse aggregate, the type and amount of powder, the unit water amount, the fine aggregate Display the setting range such as the amount of admixture, the amount of admixture, etc., input the set value according to the displayed setting range, determine and display the standard formulation from the above input results, and based on this standard formulation The result of the trial kneading performed is compared with the target performance. If the result of the trial kneading does not match the target performance, the increase or decrease of the item to be corrected is selected and displayed from the correction item table, and the displayed correction item is displayed. The trial mixing results based on the determined blending conditions are compared again with the target performance.If the trial mixing results fall within the target performance range, the material mix in the actual plant is Quality fluctuation If you force, when the trial kneading results are within the scope of the quality variation, compared with the quality of the cured and target performance, try kneaded result is included in the range of target performance,
A method for selecting a mix design for high-fluidity concrete, etc., characterized by displaying the mix.
【請求項2】コンクリートなど構造物の条件を入力する
手段と、 コンクリートなどの目標とする性能を決定して表示する
手段と、 粗骨材の寸法や量、粉体の種類や量、単位水量、細骨材
の量、混和剤の量などの配合設定範囲を表示し、表示さ
れた設定範囲にしたがって設定値を入力する手段と、 以上の入力結果から、標準配合を決定して表示する手段
と、 この標準配合に基づいて行なった試し練りの結果と、目
標性能とを比較する手段と、 試し練りの結果と目標性能が一致しない場合に、補正す
べき項目の増減を補正項目テーブルから選択して表示す
る手段と、 表示された補正項目にしたがって再度配合条件を入力す
る手段と、 再度決定した配合条件に基づく試し練りの結果と、目標
性能とを比較する手段と、 試し練りの結果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、実
際のプラントにおける材料の品質変動を入力する手段
と、 試し練りの結果が品質変動の範囲に含まれる場合に、硬
化後の品質と目標性能とを比較する手段と、 試し練りした結果が目標性能の範囲に含まれる場合に、
その配合を表示する手段より構成した、 高流動性コンクリートなどの配合設計選定装置。
2. A means for inputting conditions of a structure such as concrete, a means for determining and displaying a target performance such as concrete, a size and amount of coarse aggregate, a type and amount of powder, and a unit water amount. Means for displaying the setting range of the amount of fine aggregate, amount of the admixture, etc., and means for inputting the set values according to the displayed setting range; means for determining and displaying the standard compounding from the above input results And a means for comparing the results of the trial kneading performed based on this standard formulation with the target performance. If the results of the trial kneading do not match the target performance, select from the correction item table the increase or decrease in the items to be corrected. A means for inputting the blending conditions again according to the displayed correction items; a means for comparing the trial kneading result based on the determined blending conditions again with the target performance; Goal Means for inputting the quality variation of the material in the actual plant when included in the range, and means for comparing the quality after curing and the target performance when the result of the trial kneading is included in the range of the quality variation. , If the result of trial work is within the target performance range,
A mixing design selection device for high-fluidity concrete, etc., composed of means for displaying the mixing.
JP36221497A 1997-12-11 1997-12-11 Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc. Pending JPH11170244A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP36221497A JPH11170244A (en) 1997-12-11 1997-12-11 Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP36221497A JPH11170244A (en) 1997-12-11 1997-12-11 Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc.

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11170244A true JPH11170244A (en) 1999-06-29

Family

ID=18476283

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP36221497A Pending JPH11170244A (en) 1997-12-11 1997-12-11 Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc.

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH11170244A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008100884A (en) * 2006-10-20 2008-05-01 Tobishima Corp Method for designing aggregate/cement mixing ratio
JP2010247546A (en) * 2010-07-30 2010-11-04 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The Housing performance evaluation check sheet
JP2014080768A (en) * 2012-10-16 2014-05-08 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Vertical loading testing method of existing pile, and construction method of concrete reaction body
CN109307640A (en) * 2017-07-28 2019-02-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of method of friction reducer content in measurement slippery water
JP2021021224A (en) * 2019-07-26 2021-02-18 株式会社安藤・間 Composition design method of sprayed concrete and concrete spray method

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008100884A (en) * 2006-10-20 2008-05-01 Tobishima Corp Method for designing aggregate/cement mixing ratio
JP2010247546A (en) * 2010-07-30 2010-11-04 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The Housing performance evaluation check sheet
JP2014080768A (en) * 2012-10-16 2014-05-08 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Vertical loading testing method of existing pile, and construction method of concrete reaction body
CN109307640A (en) * 2017-07-28 2019-02-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of method of friction reducer content in measurement slippery water
JP2021021224A (en) * 2019-07-26 2021-02-18 株式会社安藤・間 Composition design method of sprayed concrete and concrete spray method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Şahmaran et al. Improving the workability and rheological properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites using factorial experimental design
Sethy et al. Utilization of high volume of industrial slag in self compacting concrete
Juradin et al. Impact of vibrations on the final characteristics of normal and self-compacting concrete
Kismi et al. Minimizing water dosage of superplasticized mortars and concretes for a given consistency
Kwan et al. Filler technology for improving robustness and reducing cementitious paste volume of SCC
JPH11170244A (en) Method and apparatus for formulation/design/selection of high fluidity concrete, etc.
JP6308773B2 (en) Concrete production method
JP2008031769A (en) Mixing design method and soil cement
CN109684783A (en) A kind of MIX PROPORTION DESIGN OF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE method based on mortar rheological behavior
Bartos et al. Interaction of particles in fibre reinforced concrete
JP7429588B2 (en) Concrete manufacturing control method
JPH07227832A (en) Method and apparatus for quality control of concrete
JP4469547B2 (en) Ready-mixed concrete manufacturing method and manufacturing apparatus
Bonen et al. Robustness of SCC
JP2021046675A (en) Construction method of ground improvement work
JP7103771B2 (en) Concrete, tunnel lining and concrete compound design method
JPH1142630A (en) Method for blending design of high-fluid concrete
CN113860810B (en) Concrete mix proportion optimization method based on working performance and construction cost
Ng et al. Improving particle size distribution in cement paste by blending with superfine cement
JP2002205304A (en) Method and apparatus for correcting composition of ready-mixed concrete
JP2004002203A (en) Low-strength mortar filling using shirasu
JPH0760742A (en) Method of mixing and designing compaction-free concrete to be air placed
JP7372044B2 (en) Method for adjusting the usage ratio of early strength cement and blast furnace cement B type, method for manufacturing mixed cement, method for manufacturing ready-mixed concrete
JPH0780695B2 (en) Hydraulic cement
JPH09277246A (en) Quality control apparatus at time of production of highly flowable concrete

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20041007

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070129

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Effective date: 20070814

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070928

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20071106