JPH11158651A - Chromated stainless steel sheet excellent in resistant to rusting - Google Patents
Chromated stainless steel sheet excellent in resistant to rustingInfo
- Publication number
- JPH11158651A JPH11158651A JP34392297A JP34392297A JPH11158651A JP H11158651 A JPH11158651 A JP H11158651A JP 34392297 A JP34392297 A JP 34392297A JP 34392297 A JP34392297 A JP 34392297A JP H11158651 A JPH11158651 A JP H11158651A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- stainless steel
- phosphoric acid
- steel sheet
- total
- chromate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、ステンレス鋼板表面を
クロメ−ト皮膜により黄色に着色させず、初期発銹防止
に有効なクロメ−ト処理ステンレス鋼板に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a chromate-treated stainless steel sheet which does not cause the surface of the stainless steel sheet to be colored yellow by a chromate film and is effective in preventing initial rust.
【0002】[0002]
【従来技術】ステンレス鋼板は、耐食性に優れ、また、
美麗な外観肌を有するので、建材に使用する場合、その
外観肌を利用して、裸状態で使用することが多い。この
ため、ステンレス鋼板には裸状態での使用に対応して種
々の表面仕上げが用意され、需要者の要求に対応できる
ようになっている。しかし、内外装材に使用する場合は
光沢の高い鏡面仕上げのものより肌の粗いHL仕上げの
ものの要求が一般に多い。しかしながら、ステンレス鋼
板は同一鋼種でも仕上げにより耐食性が変化し、肌が粗
いもの程耐食性が低下する。このため、HL仕上げのも
のを使用した場合には銹の発生が滑らかな仕上げのもの
より早くなる。2. Description of the Related Art Stainless steel sheets have excellent corrosion resistance.
Since it has a beautiful appearance skin, when it is used for a building material, it is often used in a naked state using the appearance skin. For this reason, various surface finishes are prepared for the stainless steel plate for use in a bare state, so that it can meet the demands of consumers. However, when used for interior / exterior materials, there is a general demand for an HL finish with a rougher surface than a mirror finish with a high gloss. However, the corrosion resistance of the stainless steel plate changes depending on the finish even with the same steel type, and the corrosion resistance decreases as the skin becomes rougher. For this reason, when the HL finish is used, the generation of rust is faster than that of the smooth finish.
【0003】そこで、初期の銹発生を抑制するため、従
来より種々の方法が提案されている。その代表的な方法
はクリヤ−塗料をステンレス鋼板表面に塗装する方法で
ある。しかし、クリヤ−塗装を施すと、金属光沢が失わ
れ、塗装鋼板であるとの外観を与え、塗膜を薄くして
も、ステンレス鋼板本来の肌が微妙に変化してしまう。
また、クリヤ−塗膜は紫外線を遮蔽する顔料を含んでい
ないため、耐候性が一般に劣り、しかも、ステンレス鋼
板も塗装性に劣るので、クリヤ−塗料に耐食性、耐候性
に優れたものを使用しても、比較的短期間に塗膜が剥離
してしまう。[0003] Therefore, various methods have been conventionally proposed to suppress the initial generation of rust. A typical method is to apply a clear paint on the surface of a stainless steel plate. However, when the clear coating is applied, the metallic luster is lost, giving the appearance of a coated steel plate, and even if the coating film is thinned, the original skin of the stainless steel plate is slightly changed.
Also, since the clear coating film does not contain a pigment that blocks ultraviolet rays, the weather resistance is generally inferior. In addition, since the stainless steel plate is also inferior in paintability, a clear paint having excellent corrosion resistance and weather resistance should be used. Even so, the coating film peels off in a relatively short time.
【0004】このため、クリヤ−塗装を施しても、銹の
発生は塗膜の剥離するまでの期間だけ単に遅れるもので
あった。また、クリヤ−塗装のステンレス鋼板は専用の
塗装ラインを設ける程需要がないため、その塗装は亜鉛
めっき鋼板やアルミニウムめっき鋼板などの連続塗装ラ
インを利用しているが、それでも塗装費が高くなるとい
う問題があった。For this reason, even if the clear coating is applied, the generation of rust is simply delayed until the coating film is peeled off. In addition, since there is no demand for clear-painted stainless steel plates to provide a dedicated coating line, the coating uses continuous coating lines such as galvanized steel plates and aluminum-plated steel plates, but coating costs are still high. There was a problem.
【0005】[0005]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】そこで、本発明は、初
期の銹発生を遅くでき、処理費の安価なステンレス鋼板
を提供するものである。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a stainless steel sheet which can delay the generation of rust at an early stage and has a low processing cost.
【0006】[0006]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明における第1発明
は、ステンレス鋼板をリン酸、リン酸化合物のいずれか
一方または両方と硝酸とを含有する水溶液で洗浄して、
表面から10nm以内の深さでのFe2O3とFeとのF
e2p3/2ピ−ク強度比をFe2O3/Feで0.1〜0.
9とした後、全Crが1〜40g/Lで、6価Cr含有
量がCr6+/全Crの比率で0.1以下であるクロメ−
ト処理液を塗布して、水洗することなく乾燥させ、Cr
付着量が5〜200mg/m2であるクロメ−ト皮膜を
形成したことを特徴としている。According to a first aspect of the present invention, a stainless steel sheet is washed with an aqueous solution containing one or both of phosphoric acid and a phosphoric acid compound and nitric acid.
F 2 of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe at a depth within 10 nm from the surface
e2p 3/2 peak - 0.1 to 0 the click intensity ratio Fe 2 O 3 / Fe.
After setting to 9, the chromium having a total Cr content of 1 to 40 g / L and a hexavalent Cr content of 0.1 or less in a ratio of Cr 6+ / total Cr is 0.1 or less.
Coating solution and dry without washing with water
It is characterized in that a chromate film having an adhesion amount of 5 to 200 mg / m 2 is formed.
【0007】また、第2発明は、第1発明において、ク
ロメ−ト処理液がリン酸もしくはリン酸化合物をP/全
Cr=0.1〜4.0の比率になるように添加したもので
あることを特徴としている。さらに、第3発明は第1発
明または第2発明において、クロメ−ト処理液がシリカ
ゾルをSi/全Cr=0.5〜3.0の比率になるように
添加したものであることを特徴としている。In a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect, the chromate treatment solution is prepared by adding phosphoric acid or a phosphoric acid compound in a ratio of P / total Cr = 0.1 to 4.0. It is characterized by having. Further, the third invention is characterized in that, in the first invention or the second invention, the chromate treatment solution is obtained by adding silica sol in a ratio of Si / total Cr = 0.5 to 3.0. I have.
【0008】[0008]
【作用】本発明のステンレス鋼板は、クロメ−ト処理の
ものであるが、クロメ−ト皮膜は6価Cr含有量の多い
ものにする程耐発銹性は向上し、それに比例して黄色味
が強くなる。しかし、ステンレス鋼板を裸で内外装材に
使用するには銀白色の金属外観と仕上げ肌を利用するも
のであるから、クロメ−ト皮膜で外観が黄色に変化した
のではステンレス鋼板本来の外観が失われてしまう。The stainless steel sheet of the present invention has been subjected to chromate treatment. As the chromate film has a higher hexavalent Cr content, the rust resistance improves, and the yellow tint increases in proportion thereto. Becomes stronger. However, when a stainless steel sheet is used naked for interior and exterior materials, it uses a silver-white metal appearance and a finished skin. Will be lost.
【0009】そこで、本発明者らは、耐発銹性に優れた
無色クロメ−ト皮膜の形成可能な処理液組成を検討した
結果、クロメ−ト処理液の6価Cr含有量を従来の限界
とされている量より極端に少なくして、クロメ−ト皮膜
のCr付着量を200mg/m2程度まで多くしても着
色しないようにしたのである。すなわち、従来のクロメ
−ト処理液では反応型、塗布型を問わず6価Crの最大
含有量は全Crの50%程度であったが、本発明では6
価Cr含有量をCr6+/全Crの比率で0.1以下にし
て、クロメ−ト皮膜を無色にできるようにしたのであ
る。The inventors of the present invention have studied the composition of a treatment solution capable of forming a colorless chromate film having excellent rust resistance, and found that the content of hexavalent Cr in the chromate treatment solution was limited to the conventional value. The amount was made extremely small to prevent coloring even if the amount of Cr adhering to the chromate film was increased to about 200 mg / m 2 . That is, in the conventional chromate treatment solution, the maximum content of hexavalent Cr was about 50% of the total Cr regardless of the reaction type or the coating type.
The chromium content was made to be 0.1 or less in the ratio of Cr 6+ / total Cr so that the chromate film could be made colorless.
【0010】しかし、処理液の6価Cr含有量をCr6+
/全Crの比率で0.1以下にすると、ステンレス鋼板
に塗布した場合に従来のクロメ−ト処理液よりハジキを
生じ易く、このハジキにはステンレス鋼板の表層酸化皮
膜の中でFe2O3成分が大きく影響することが判明し
た。なお、表層の酸化皮膜組成はステンレス鋼板の鋼種
や仕上げにより異なるが、SUS304の2BおよびH
L仕上げ材の表面から10nm以内の深さでのFe2O3
成分をXPSにより分析した結果、Fe2O3とFeとの
Fe2p3/2ピ−ク強度比はFe2O3/Feで3.0〜
5.0である。[0010] However, the hexavalent Cr content of the processing solution is changed to Cr 6+
When the ratio of the total Cr is set to 0.1 or less, repelling is more likely to occur when applied to a stainless steel sheet than in the conventional chromate treatment solution. This repelling is caused by Fe 2 O 3 in the surface oxide film of the stainless steel sheet. The components were found to have a significant effect. The composition of the oxide film on the surface depends on the type and finish of the stainless steel sheet.
Fe 2 O 3 at a depth within 10 nm from the surface of the L-finished material
Results The components were analyzed by XPS, Fe2p 3/2 peak of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe - click intensity ratio 3.0 with Fe 2 O 3 / Fe
5.0.
【0011】そこで、ステンレス鋼板の外観を損なうこ
となく表層のFe2O3成分を除去して、親水化できる方
法を鋭意検討した結果、リン酸、リン酸化合物のいずれ
か一方または両方を含有する水溶液で洗浄すればよいこ
とを見いだした。しかし、まだ親水化は不十分であっ
た。このため、さらに親水化できる方法を検討した結
果、リン酸、リン酸化合物のいずれか一方または両方と
硝酸とを含有する水溶液で洗浄すればよいことを見いだ
した。この水溶液洗浄によりステンレス鋼板表面が親水
性になる原理はXPS分析結果から、Fe2O3成分除去
のほかに以下のように撥水性のCr酸化物がCr水酸化
物に変化するためであると推定される。Therefore, as a result of intensive studies on a method capable of removing the surface Fe 2 O 3 component without impairing the appearance of the stainless steel plate and making it hydrophilic, it was found that the stainless steel sheet contains one or both of phosphoric acid and a phosphoric acid compound. It has been found that washing with an aqueous solution is sufficient. However, the hydrophilization was still insufficient. For this reason, as a result of further studying a method capable of hydrophilizing, it was found that washing with an aqueous solution containing one or both of phosphoric acid and a phosphoric acid compound and nitric acid was sufficient. The principle that the surface of the stainless steel plate becomes hydrophilic by washing with the aqueous solution is based on the result of XPS analysis that in addition to the removal of the Fe 2 O 3 component, the water-repellent Cr oxide changes to Cr hydroxide as follows. Presumed.
【0012】すなわち、図1から図3はステンレス鋼板
(SUS304、No.4仕上げ)の未処理材、リン酸
水溶液処理材、リン酸と硝酸の混酸水溶液処理材のXP
S分析チャ−トを示したものであるが、水溶液での処理
材はいずれも未処理材よりもFe2O3のFe2p3/2ピ
−ク強度は小さくなり、逆にCr2p3/2ピ−クおよび
Ni2p3/2ピ−クの強度は大きくなっていて、表層酸
化皮膜のFe2O3は除去されていることがわかる。そし
て、Cr2p3/2ピ−ク強度では、未処理材に存在して
いたCr2O3ピ−クが洗浄により消滅して、Cr(O
H)3・nH2Oに変化している。また、水溶液の種類に
よる処理材のピ−ク強度を比較すると、リン酸水溶液処
理材よりリン酸と硝酸の混酸水溶液処理材の方がFe2
O3のFe2p3/2ピ−ク強度が小さくなり、Ni2p
3/2ピ−ク強度やCr(OH)3・nH2OのCr2p3/2
ピ−ク強度が大きくなっている。しかも、Cr(OH)
3・nH2OのCr2p3/2ピ−ク強度は増加が著しい。
このことから、リン酸と硝酸の混酸水溶液処理材がリン
酸水溶液処理材より親水性が高くなるのはCr酸化物の
大部分がCr水酸化物に変化したためと考えられるので
ある。なお、リン酸化合物と硝酸とを含有する水溶液に
よる処理材の場合も同様の結果が得られる。FIG. 1 to FIG. 3 show XP of untreated material of stainless steel plate (SUS304, No. 4 finish), treated material of phosphoric acid aqueous solution, and treated material of mixed acid aqueous solution of phosphoric acid and nitric acid.
S Analysis Cha - but shows the bets, Fe2p 3/2 peak processing material Fe 2 O 3 than either the untreated material with an aqueous solution - click intensity decreases, Cr2p 3/2 peak reversed - click and Ni2p 3/2 peak - intensity clauses have increased, Fe 2 O 3 in the surface layer oxide film is seen to have been removed. Then, Cr2p 3/2 peak - the click intensity, Cr 2 O 3 peak was present in the untreated material - disappeared click is by washing, Cr (O
H) It has changed to 3 · nH 2 O. Also, comparing the peak strengths of the treatment materials depending on the type of the aqueous solution, it is clear that the mixed acid aqueous solution treatment of phosphoric acid and nitric acid has a higher Fe 2 O 3 concentration than the phosphoric acid aqueous solution treatment material.
Fe2p 3/2 peak of O 3 - click strength decreases, Ni2p
3/2 peak strength or Cr2p 3/2 of Cr (OH) 3 .nH 2 O
The peak strength is large. Moreover, Cr (OH)
3 · nH 2 O in Cr2p 3/2 peak - click strength increase is remarkable.
From this, it is considered that the reason why the mixed acid aqueous solution treatment of phosphoric acid and nitric acid became more hydrophilic than the phosphoric acid aqueous solution treatment material was that most of the Cr oxide was changed to Cr hydroxide. Note that the same result can be obtained in the case of a treatment material using an aqueous solution containing a phosphoric acid compound and nitric acid.
【0013】しかし、リン酸、リン酸化合物のいずれか
一方または両方と硝酸とを含有する水溶液による洗浄
は、ステンレス鋼板の表面から10nm以内の深さでの
Fe2O3とFeとのFe2p3/2ピ−ク強度比がFe2O
3/Feで0.1未満となるまで行うと、部分的にエッチ
ングが過剰になり、外観が阻害され、0.9を超えるま
で行うと、ハジキを防止できなくなる。このため、洗浄
はFe2O3とFeとのFe2p3/2ピ−ク強度比が0.1
〜0.9の範囲になるように行う。なお、水溶液でのリ
ン酸や硝酸の濃度はリン酸1g/L以上、硝酸0.1g
/L以上にすると、洗浄時間を短時間にすることがで
き、作業性がよい。また、水溶液での洗浄後には水洗も
しくは湯洗を施し、その後引き続いてクロメ−ト皮膜を
形成するようにするのが好ましい。[0013] However, phosphoric acid, washed with an aqueous solution containing the one or both nitric phosphate compound, Fe2p 3 of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe at a depth within 10nm from the surface of the stainless steel plate / 2 peak intensity ratio is Fe 2 O
If the ratio of 3 / Fe is less than 0.1, the etching becomes partially excessive and the appearance is hindered. If the ratio exceeds 0.9, cissing cannot be prevented. Therefore, cleaning Fe2p 3/2 peak of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe - click intensity ratio is 0.1
This is performed so as to be in the range of 0.9. The concentration of phosphoric acid or nitric acid in the aqueous solution is not less than 1 g / L of phosphoric acid and 0.1 g of nitric acid.
When it is / L or more, the cleaning time can be shortened, and the workability is good. Further, it is preferable that after washing with an aqueous solution, washing with water or hot water is performed, and then a chromate film is formed subsequently.
【0014】クロメ−ト処理液は、皮膜の耐食性、処理
液のゲル化などの点から全Cr(3価と6価Crの合
計)を1〜40g/Lにする。1g/L未満であると、
6価Cr量が少ないため、クロメ−ト皮膜の耐食性が不
充分となり、40g/Lより多いと、処理液がゲル化し
易い傾向になる。また、クロメ−ト皮膜のCr付着量は
5〜200mg/m2にする。これは5mg/m2未満で
あると、ステンレス鋼板に対する耐発銹性付与が不十分
で、200mg/m2を超えると、クロメ−ト皮膜の密
着性が低下するからである。クロメ−ト処理は、反応型
クロメ−ト処理液であると、クロメ−ト皮膜のCr付着
量を200mg/m2まで多くすることは困難であるの
で、塗布型のものを用いる。In the chromate treatment liquid, the total Cr (total of trivalent and hexavalent Cr) is adjusted to 1 to 40 g / L from the viewpoints of the corrosion resistance of the film and the gelation of the treatment liquid. When it is less than 1 g / L,
Since the amount of hexavalent Cr is small, the corrosion resistance of the chromate film becomes insufficient, and if it exceeds 40 g / L, the treatment liquid tends to gel. The amount of Cr adhering to the chromate film is 5 to 200 mg / m 2 . This is because if it is less than 5 mg / m 2 , rust resistance is not sufficiently imparted to the stainless steel plate, and if it exceeds 200 mg / m 2 , the adhesion of the chromate film is reduced. In the case of a chromate treatment, it is difficult to increase the amount of Cr adhering to the chromate film to 200 mg / m 2 if it is a reaction type chromate treatment solution.
【0015】クロメ−ト処理液には、クロム酸、クロム
酸塩、重クロム酸塩のような水溶性クロム化合物を含有
する水溶液を用いるが、6価Cr含有量をCr6+/全C
rの比率で0.1以下にするには、還元剤として、オキ
シカルボン酸化合物を用いれば、処理液をゲル化させる
ことなく可能である。ここで、オキシカルボン酸化合物
とは、例えば、酒石酸、マロン酸、クエン酸、乳酸、グ
ルコ−ル酸、グリセリン酸、トロパ酸、ベンジル酸、ヒ
ドロキシ吉草酸等のように水酸基とカルボキシル基を有
するもので、水酸基が6価クロムを3価クロムに還元
し、カルボキシル基が3価クロムの化合物に配位して、
ゲル化を防止するものと考えられる。[0015] chromate - The preparative process liquid, chromic acid, chromates, but using an aqueous solution containing a water-soluble chromium compound such as bichromate, hexavalent Cr content Cr 6+ / total C
The ratio of r can be set to 0.1 or less by using an oxycarboxylic acid compound as the reducing agent without causing the treatment liquid to gel. Here, oxycarboxylic acid compounds include those having a hydroxyl group and a carboxyl group such as tartaric acid, malonic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, gluconic acid, glyceric acid, tropic acid, benzylic acid, hydroxyvaleric acid and the like. The hydroxyl group reduces hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, and the carboxyl group coordinates to the compound of trivalent chromium.
It is thought to prevent gelation.
【0016】クロメ−ト処理液には、リン酸またはリン
酸化合物を添加すると、形成されるクロメ−ト皮膜は難
溶性のリン酸クロム皮膜になり、ステンレス鋼板の耐発
銹性を高めることができる。リン酸化合物としてはリン
酸二水素アンモニウム等のような水易溶性のものを用い
るが、添加量はP/全Cr=0.1〜4.0になるように
する。0.1未満であると、皮膜難溶化による耐発銹性
向上効果が小さく、4.0を超えると、処理液の安定性
が低下するようになる。When phosphoric acid or a phosphoric acid compound is added to the chromate treatment liquid, the formed chromate film becomes a hardly soluble chromium phosphate film, and the rust resistance of the stainless steel plate can be improved. it can. As the phosphoric acid compound, a water-soluble compound such as ammonium dihydrogen phosphate is used, and the amount of addition is adjusted so that P / total Cr = 0.1 to 4.0. If it is less than 0.1, the effect of improving the rust resistance due to insolubilization of the film is small, and if it is more than 4.0, the stability of the treatment liquid is reduced.
【0017】また、クロメ−ト処理液には、シリカゾル
を単独で、あるいは上記リン酸またはリン酸化合物とと
もに添加すると、クロメ−ト皮膜の耐発銹性、耐湿性等
を高めることができる。いずれの場合ともシリカゾルの
添加はSi/全Crの比率で0.5〜3.0の範囲にする
のが好ましい。0.5未満では耐発銹性向上効果が小さ
く、3.0を超えると、皮膜の密着性が低下する。Further, when silica sol is added to the chromate treatment solution alone or together with the above-mentioned phosphoric acid or phosphoric acid compound, the rust resistance and moisture resistance of the chromate film can be enhanced. In any case, the addition of the silica sol is preferably in the range of 0.5 to 3.0 in the ratio of Si / total Cr. If it is less than 0.5, the effect of improving rust resistance is small, and if it exceeds 3.0, the adhesion of the film is reduced.
【0018】ステンレス鋼板へのクロメ−ト処理液塗布
は、従来の塗布型クロメ−ト処理の場合と同様に公知方
法、例えば、ロ−ルコ−ト法、エア−カ−テン法、静電
霧化法、スクイズロ−ルコ−ト法などにより行い、水洗
せずに乾燥する方法で行えばよい。Chromate treatment liquid is applied to a stainless steel plate in the same manner as in the case of conventional coating type chromate treatment, such as a roll coating method, an air curtain method, and an electrostatic mist. It may be carried out by a chemical method, a squeeze roll coating method or the like, and a method of drying without washing with water.
【0019】[0019]
【実施例】実施例1 全Cr濃度の異なる無水クロム酸水溶液に酒石酸を添加
して、6価クロムの大部分を3価クロムに還元すること
により種々のクロメ−ト処理液を調製した。この処理液
をガラス容器中に密封して、40℃の雰囲気中に10日
間放置し、その後、ステンレス鋼板(SUS304、H
L仕上げ、板厚0.6mm)に塗布した。処理液の塗布
はまずステンレス鋼板をアルカリ脱脂液(pH12.
5、液温60℃)中に5秒間浸漬して、脱脂、水洗し、
次に、リン酸と硝酸の混酸水溶液(リン酸12g/L、
硝酸1.7g/L、液温60℃)中に5秒間浸漬(鋼板
表面から10nm以内の深さでのFe2O3とFeとのF
e2p3/2ピ−ク強度比:Fe2O3/Fe=0.1)し
て、水洗、乾燥し、最後にロ−ルコ−タ−で処理液を塗
布する方法で行った。そして、塗布後は到達板温100
℃で乾燥した。表1にクロメ−ト処理液の組成と下記方
法で実施した処理液の安定性およびクロメ−ト皮膜の性
能を示す。EXAMPLES Example 1 Tartaric acid was added to aqueous solutions of chromic anhydride having different total Cr concentrations to reduce most of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, thereby preparing various chromate treatment solutions. This treatment liquid was sealed in a glass container and left in an atmosphere at 40 ° C. for 10 days. Thereafter, a stainless steel plate (SUS304, H
L finish, thickness 0.6 mm). First, a stainless steel plate is treated with an alkaline degreasing solution (pH 12.
5, liquid temperature 60 ° C) for 5 seconds, degreased, washed with water,
Next, a mixed acid aqueous solution of phosphoric acid and nitric acid (phosphoric acid 12 g / L,
Immersion in 1.7 g / L of nitric acid at a liquid temperature of 60 ° C. for 5 seconds (F of Fe 2 O 3 and Fe at a depth of 10 nm or less from the steel sheet surface)
e2p 3/2 peak intensity ratio: Fe 2 O 3 /Fe=0.1), washing with water, drying, and finally applying a treatment liquid with a roll coater. And after the application, the reached plate temperature 100
Dried at ° C. Table 1 shows the composition of the chromate treatment solution, the stability of the treatment solution carried out by the following method, and the performance of the chromate film.
【0020】(1)クロメ−ト処理液の安定性試験 処理液をガラス容器中に密封して、40℃の雰囲気中に
放置する方法でゲル化が認められるまでの日数を観察
し、10日間放置してもゲル化や沈降の認められなかっ
たものを記号○、認められたものを記号×で評価した。 (2)色調試験 鋼板の黄色度をJIS Z 8730に準拠したLab
法でb値を測定して、b値が5.0未満のものを記号○
で、5.0以上のものを記号×で評価した。なお、b値
が大きい程黄色度が強い。(1) Stability test of chromate treatment solution The treatment solution was sealed in a glass container and left in an atmosphere of 40 ° C. to observe the number of days until gelation was observed. When no gelation or sedimentation was observed even when the mixture was allowed to stand, it was evaluated by the symbol ○, and when it was observed, it was evaluated by the symbol ×. (2) Color tone test The yellowness of the steel sheet was measured in accordance with JIS Z 8730 by Lab.
The b value was measured by the method, and those having a b value of less than 5.0
And those having a value of 5.0 or more were evaluated with the symbol x. In addition, yellowness is so strong that b value is large.
【0021】(3)クロメ−ト皮膜の密着性試験 試験片にセロテ−プをいったん貼付けた後剥離するテ−
ピング試験を行い、皮膜剥離が認められなかったものを
記号○で、一部に皮膜剥離が認められたものを記号△
で、全面に皮膜剥離が認められたものを記号×で評価し
た。 (4)耐発銹性試験 試験片を屋外に暴露して、発銹が認められるまでの日数
を観察し、6カ月以上発銹の認められなかったものを記
号◎で、3カ月以上、6カ月まで発銹の認められなかっ
たものを記号○で、1カ月以上、3カ月まで発銹の認め
られなかったものを記号△で、1カ月までに発銹の認め
られたものを記号×で評価した。 (5)耐ハジキ性 クロメ−ト処理液塗布後の鋼板表面を観察し、ハジキが
認められなかったものを記号○で、ハジキが生じたもの
を記号×で評価した。(3) Adhesion test of chromate film A tape to which a cellophane was once attached to a test piece and then peeled off
In the ping test, a symbol 皮膜 indicates that no film peeling was observed, and a symbol を indicates that some film peeling was observed.
In the above, those in which film peeling was observed on the entire surface were evaluated with the symbol x. (4) Rust resistance test The test piece was exposed outdoors and the number of days until rust was observed was observed. If no rust was observed for up to 1 month, mark ○; if no rust was observed for more than 1 month and 3 months, mark △; if rust was recognized by 1 month, mark x evaluated. (5) Repelling resistance The surface of the steel sheet after the application of the chromate treatment liquid was observed, and those with no repelling were evaluated with the symbol 、, and those with repelling were evaluated with the symbol x.
【0022】[0022]
【表1】 (注1)比較例4は処理液ゲル化のため、塗布困難であ
った。 (注2)比較例5はリン酸と硝酸の混酸水溶液での洗浄
を行わなかったので、ハジキが生じ、性能評価は困難で
あった。 (注3)比較例6はリン酸16g/Lのみの水溶液で洗
浄し、比較例7は硝酸3g/Lのみの水溶液で洗浄した
ので、クロメ−ト皮膜にハジキが生じ、性能評価は困難
であった。[Table 1] (Note 1) In Comparative Example 4, application was difficult due to gelation of the treatment liquid. (Note 2) In Comparative Example 5, cleaning was not performed with a mixed acid aqueous solution of phosphoric acid and nitric acid, so that repelling occurred and performance evaluation was difficult. (Note 3) Comparative Example 6 was washed with an aqueous solution containing only 16 g / L of phosphoric acid, and Comparative Example 7 was washed with an aqueous solution containing only 3 g / L of nitric acid. there were.
【0023】実施例2 実施例1において、クロメ−ト処理液を全Cr濃度が1
0g/Lのクロム酸アンモニウム水溶液の6価クロムを
酒石酸の添加により3価クロムに還元した後、リン酸お
よびシリカゾルを添加したものに変更して、1分間洗浄
し、クロメ−ト皮膜のCr付着量を30mg/m2一定
にした。また、リン酸と硝酸の混酸水溶液を濃度がリン
酸1g/L、硝酸0.1g/Lのものに変更して、鋼板表
面から10nm以内の深さでのFe2O3とFeとのFe
2p3/2ピ−ク強度比をFe2O3/Fe=0.9とし、さ
らに、ステンレス鋼板をSUS304、2B仕上げ、板
厚0.6mmのものに変更した。表2にクロメ−ト処理
液の組成と実施例1で実施した試験(2)〜(5)のク
ロメ−ト皮膜性能を示す。Example 2 The same procedure as in Example 1 was repeated except that the chromate treatment solution was used when the total Cr concentration was 1%.
After reducing hexavalent chromium in an aqueous solution of 0 g / L ammonium chromate to trivalent chromium by adding tartaric acid, changing to a solution containing phosphoric acid and silica sol, washing for 1 minute, and adhering Cr to the chromate film The amount was kept constant at 30 mg / m 2 . Further, the concentration of the mixed acid aqueous solution of phosphoric acid and nitric acid was changed to that of 1 g / L of phosphoric acid and 0.1 g / L of nitric acid, and Fe 2 O 3 and Fe at a depth of 10 nm or less from the steel sheet surface.
The 2p 3/2 peak strength ratio was Fe 2 O 3 /Fe=0.9, and the stainless steel plate was changed to SUS304, 2B finish, and 0.6 mm thick. Table 2 shows the composition of the chromate treatment solution and the chromate film performance of the tests (2) to (5) performed in Example 1.
【0024】[0024]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0025】[0025]
【発明の効果】以上のように、ステンレス鋼板をリン
酸、リン酸化合物のいずれか一方または両方と硝酸とを
含有する水溶液で洗浄して、表面から10nm以内の深
さでのFe2O3とFeとのFe2p3/2ピ−ク強度比を
Fe2O3/Feで0.1〜0.9にすると、無色クロメ−
ト皮膜の形成される6価Cr含有量をCr6+/全Crの
比率で0.1以下にしたクロメ−ト処理液で処理して
も、ハジキが発生しない。また、このクロメ−ト処理液
によるクロメ−ト皮膜は皮膜量を多くしても無色である
ので、ステンレス鋼板の外観は変化せず、耐発銹性に優
れている。As described above, the stainless steel plate is washed with an aqueous solution containing one or both of phosphoric acid and a phosphoric acid compound and nitric acid, and the Fe 2 O 3 is removed from the surface at a depth of 10 nm or less. Fe2p 3/2 peak of Fe and - the click intensity ratio 0.1 to 0.9 in the Fe 2 O 3 / Fe, colorless chromate -
No repelling occurs even when the coating is treated with a chromate treatment solution in which the hexavalent Cr content at which the coating film is formed is reduced to a Cr 6+ / total Cr ratio of 0.1 or less. Further, since the chromate film formed by the chromate treatment liquid is colorless even when the amount of the film is increased, the appearance of the stainless steel plate does not change and the stainless steel plate is excellent in rust resistance.
【図1】XPS分析によるFe2p3/2ピ−ク強度を示
すものである。FIG. 1 shows the peak intensity of Fe2p 3/2 by XPS analysis.
【図2】XPS分析によるCr2p3/2ピ−ク強度を示
すものである。FIG. 2 shows the Cr2p 3/2 peak intensity by XPS analysis.
【図3】XPS分析によるNi2p3/2ピ−ク強度を示
すものである。FIG. 3 shows Ni2p 3/2 peak intensity by XPS analysis.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 古川 伸也 大阪府堺市石津西町5番地 日新製鋼株式 会社技術研究所表面処理研究部内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Shinya Furukawa 5th Ishizu Nishimachi, Sakai-shi, Osaka Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.
Claims (3)
物のいずれか一方または両方と硝酸とを含有する水溶液
で洗浄して、表面から10nm以内の深さでのFe2O3
とFeとのFe2p3/2ピ−ク強度比をFe2O3/Fe
で0.1〜0.9とした後、全Crが1〜40g/Lで、
6価Cr含有量がCr6+/全Crの比率で0.1以下で
あるクロメ−ト処理液を塗布して、水洗することなく乾
燥させることにより、Cr付着量が5〜200mg/m
2であるクロメ−ト皮膜を形成したことを特徴とする耐
発銹性に優れたクロメ−ト処理ステンレス鋼板。1. A stainless steel sheet is washed with an aqueous solution containing one or both of phosphoric acid and a phosphoric acid compound and nitric acid, and the Fe 2 O 3 at a depth of 10 nm or less from the surface.
Fe2p 3/2 peak of the Fe - the click intensity ratio Fe 2 O 3 / Fe
After 0.1 to 0.9, the total Cr is 1 to 40 g / L,
A chromate treatment solution having a hexavalent Cr content of 0.1 or less in the ratio of Cr 6+ / total Cr is applied and dried without washing with water, so that the Cr adhesion amount is 5 to 200 mg / m 2.
2. A chromate-treated stainless steel sheet having excellent rust resistance, characterized by forming a chromate film of 2 .
がリン酸もしくはリン酸化合物をP/全Cr=0.1〜
4.0の比率になるように添加したものであることを特
徴とする耐発銹性に優れたクロメ−ト処理ステンレス鋼
板。2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the chromate treatment solution contains phosphoric acid or a phosphoric acid compound, wherein P / total Cr = 0.1 to 1.0.
A chromated stainless steel sheet having excellent rust resistance, characterized in that it is added so as to have a ratio of 4.0.
ト処理液がシリカゾルをSi/全Cr=0.5〜3.0の
比率になるように添加したものであることを特徴とする
耐発銹性に優れたクロメ−ト処理ステンレス鋼板。3. The method according to claim 1, wherein
A chromate-treated stainless steel sheet having excellent rust resistance, characterized in that a silica sol is added so that the ratio of Si / total Cr is 0.5 to 3.0.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP34392297A JPH11158651A (en) | 1997-11-29 | 1997-11-29 | Chromated stainless steel sheet excellent in resistant to rusting |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP34392297A JPH11158651A (en) | 1997-11-29 | 1997-11-29 | Chromated stainless steel sheet excellent in resistant to rusting |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH11158651A true JPH11158651A (en) | 1999-06-15 |
Family
ID=18365285
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP34392297A Pending JPH11158651A (en) | 1997-11-29 | 1997-11-29 | Chromated stainless steel sheet excellent in resistant to rusting |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH11158651A (en) |
-
1997
- 1997-11-29 JP JP34392297A patent/JPH11158651A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR20010041809A (en) | Surface treatment composition and surface treatment method for metallic materials | |
JPH10510006A (en) | Compositions and methods for the treatment of conversion coated metal surfaces | |
US5344505A (en) | Non-chromium passivation method and composition for galvanized metal surfaces | |
JPH07216268A (en) | Surface treatment agent for zinc-containing metal-coated steel sheet, excellent in corrosion resistance and coating adhesion | |
CA2437200A1 (en) | Rustproofing agent for zinc plated steel sheet | |
US5395655A (en) | Composition and process for chromating metal surfaces | |
WO1981002749A1 (en) | Composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces | |
KR100496221B1 (en) | Phosphate-treated electrogalvanized steel sheet excellent in corrosion resistance and coating suitability | |
JP3983386B2 (en) | Chromate antirust treatment agent | |
JPH11158651A (en) | Chromated stainless steel sheet excellent in resistant to rusting | |
JP3490249B2 (en) | Chromated stainless steel sheet with excellent rust resistance | |
JPH0564237B2 (en) | ||
JPS63219587A (en) | Manufacture of galvanized steel sheet excellent in adhesive strength of paint | |
JP3698889B2 (en) | Method for producing stainless steel structure with excellent rust resistance | |
JP3666626B2 (en) | Stainless steel with excellent rust and fingerprint resistance | |
GB1586804A (en) | Treating zn or zn alloy surfaces | |
KR100296687B1 (en) | Chromate solution with superior corrosion/blackening resistance for hot dipped galvanized steel sheet | |
JP3829947B2 (en) | Metal surface treatment composition | |
JP2839971B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing transparent fluororesin-coated stainless steel sheet | |
JP3335261B2 (en) | Method for producing blackened zinc-based plated steel sheet | |
USRE35688E (en) | Composition and method for treatment of phosphated metal surfaces | |
JPH0432576A (en) | Solution for zinc phosphate chemical conversion treatment | |
JP2959705B2 (en) | Phosphate treatment method for galvanized steel sheet | |
JPH0794715B2 (en) | Method for producing chromate-treated electrogalvanized steel sheet with excellent blackening resistance, corrosion resistance, fingerprint resistance, and chromium fixation rate after alkaline degreasing | |
JPH0679226A (en) | Aluminum material for can top |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20051227 |
|
A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20060314 |