JPH10141866A - Laying method for unshaped refractory for lining of ladle - Google Patents
Laying method for unshaped refractory for lining of ladleInfo
- Publication number
- JPH10141866A JPH10141866A JP29642596A JP29642596A JPH10141866A JP H10141866 A JPH10141866 A JP H10141866A JP 29642596 A JP29642596 A JP 29642596A JP 29642596 A JP29642596 A JP 29642596A JP H10141866 A JPH10141866 A JP H10141866A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- construction
- ladle
- frame
- refractory
- construction frame
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、鉄鋼産業における
取鍋(溶鋼容器)の内張り用(ライニング用)不定形耐火物
の施工方法に関し、特に二次精錬用取鍋の内張りを現場
で施工するのに好適な方法であって、不定形耐火物から
なる流し込み材を現場にて高密度充填が可能であり、か
つ高耐用性を有する施工体を形成することができる施工
方法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method of installing a refractory for lining a ladle (steel container) in the steel industry, and more particularly to a method for installing a ladle for secondary refining on site. The present invention relates to a construction method which is capable of filling a high-density castable material made of an amorphous refractory at a site and forming a construction body having high durability.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来から、高級鋼の溶製ニ−ズに対処す
るため、溶鋼取鍋にてLF(Ladle Furnace)処理や真空
脱ガス処理などの二次精錬処理が行われている。この二
次精錬処理処理用取鍋の内側り用ライニング材として
は、マグネシア・カ−ボン質れんが(定形耐火物)が、高
熱で長時間の精錬処理に耐える材質として、一般的に使
用されている。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in order to cope with the needs of smelting of high-grade steel, secondary refining processing such as LF (Ladle Furnace) processing and vacuum degassing processing has been performed in a molten steel ladle. As a lining material for the ladle for the secondary refining process, magnesia-carbon brick (regular refractory) is commonly used as a material that can withstand high heat and a long refining process. I have.
【0003】しかしながら、昨今の築炉作業の省力化お
よび省人化のため、上記定形耐火物に代えて“築炉の機
械化が可能な不定形耐火物”の適用が指向されてきてい
る。そして、高耐食性を有する取鍋内張り用の不定形耐
火物として、マグネシア原料を活用した流し込み材(マ
グネシア質流し込み材)が検討されている。However, in order to save labor and manpower in the furnace construction work in recent years, the application of "irregular refractories capable of mechanizing a furnace" instead of the above-mentioned fixed refractories has been pursued. As an irregular-shaped refractory for ladle lining having high corrosion resistance, a casting material (magnesia casting material) utilizing magnesia raw material has been studied.
【0004】この流し込み材の施工方法としては、パ−
マ部を築炉した取鍋缶体に流し込み施工枠を配設し、こ
の施工枠にマグネシア質流し込み材を流し込んた後、棒
状バイブレ−タ−または施工枠に取り付けた振動機を作
動させて締め固める方法である。しかし、この施工方法
では、施工体の充填密度が低いという欠点を有してお
り、そのため、耐食性,構造的スポ−リング性,耐溶損
性などが不十分であり、前記した従来のマグネシア・カ
−ボン質れんが(定形耐火物)に比して、耐用性が著しく
劣るものであった。[0004] As a method of applying the pouring material,
A casting frame is placed in a ladle can body with a built-in furnace, and a magnesia-based casting material is poured into the working frame, and then a bar-shaped vibrator or a vibrator attached to the working frame is operated and tightened. It is a method of hardening. However, this construction method has a disadvantage that the packing density of the construction body is low, and therefore, the corrosion resistance, the structural spoiling property, the erosion resistance and the like are insufficient, and the conventional magnesia cap described above is insufficient. -The durability was remarkably inferior to that of the bon brick (regular refractory).
【0005】そこで、従来から、流し込み材の充填密度
を向上させ緻密な施工体(成形体)を得る施工方法とし
て、(1) 溶湯容器の外殻鉄板と内枠との間に不定形耐火
物を流し込み、予め内枠に固定保持された真空マットを
介して減圧し、添加水の一部を吸引除去する施工方法
(特公昭56−45763号公報)、(2) 流し込み施工した材料
に、上部が開放した多数の小孔を形成し、加振・減圧し
て材料を充填する施工方法(特公平3−54604号公報)、
(3) 不定形耐火物の調製と施工の過程において、混練機
による調製後の成形枠体中に到る注入経路を真空雰囲気
とする施工方法(特公平7−84988号公報)、(4) 水を添加
した流し込み材を、減圧下で篩を通過させた後、振動テ
−ブル上で加振しながら施工枠に充填する施工方法(特
開平7−232311号公報)、などが提案されている。Therefore, conventionally, as a construction method for obtaining a dense construction body (molded body) by improving the filling density of the casting material, (1) an irregular refractory between an outer shell iron plate and an inner frame of a molten metal vessel; , And the pressure is reduced through a vacuum mat fixed and held in the inner frame in advance, and a part of the added water is removed by suction.
(Japanese Patent Publication No. 56-45763), (2) A construction method in which a large number of small holes with an open top are formed in the cast material, and the material is filled by vibration and decompression (Japanese Patent Publication No. 3-54604). Gazette),
(3) In the process of preparation and construction of an amorphous refractory, a construction method in which the injection path reaching the molded frame after preparation by the kneader is a vacuum atmosphere (Japanese Patent Publication No. 7-84988), (4) After the pouring material to which water has been added is passed through a sieve under reduced pressure, a construction method of filling the construction frame while vibrating on a vibration table (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. Hei 7-232311) has been proposed. I have.
【0006】[0006]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、上記(1)〜
(4)の施工方法は、規模の小さい小型のプレキャストブ
ロックを対象として開発されたものである。そのため、
精錬処理に使用される(溶鋼)取鍋のように、現場でかつ
大型設備に上記(1)〜(4)の施工方法をそのまま適用しよ
うとすると、つまり取鍋内張りのような大型の現場施工
用に適用しようとすると、 ・取扱の面で不十分である、 ・多大な施工設備投資を要する、 という問題があった。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] By the way, the above (1) to
The construction method of (4) was developed for small and small precast blocks. for that reason,
If you try to apply the above (1) to (4) construction methods on site and to large equipment like a (molten steel) ladle used for refining processing, that is, large on-site construction like ladle lining However, there is a problem that it is not sufficient in terms of handling and that it requires a large investment in construction equipment.
【0007】即ち、前記(1),(3),(4)の施工方法で
は、施工設備が大型化し、一般的な流し込み施工設備
(装置)と比較して、2〜3倍の設備投資を必要とする。
また、前記(2)の施工方法では、取扱い面で煩雑化す
る。さらに、前記(1)〜(4)の施工方法では、流し込み材
の搬送中に水分が減少し、取鍋のような大型の施工体を
築炉するためには流動性の低下を来たし、流し込み施工
上の問題が発生するという問題があった。That is, in the construction methods (1), (3) and (4), the construction equipment becomes large, and the general pouring construction equipment is used.
Requires 2 to 3 times more capital investment than (device).
Further, in the construction method of the above (2), handling becomes complicated. Furthermore, in the construction methods of the above (1) to (4), the water content decreases during the transportation of the casting material, and the flowability decreases in order to build a large construction body such as a ladle. There was a problem that construction problems occurred.
【0008】本発明は、上記諸問題点に鑑み成されたも
のであって、その目的とするところは、より緻密な施工
体を使用現場にて築炉可能な取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物
の施工方法を提供することにある。また、本発明は、流
し込み材を取鍋の内張り用施工枠に投入し成形される施
工体の充填密度を高め、換言すれば、見掛気孔率を低下
させることにより、取鍋の耐用性を向上させることがで
き、かつ現場施工に好適な取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の
施工方法を提供することにある。[0008] The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a refractory for lining a ladle, which can build a denser construction body at a use site. It is an object of the present invention to provide a construction method. In addition, the present invention increases the packing density of a construction body that is cast by casting a casting material into a construction frame for lining a ladle, in other words, by reducing the apparent porosity, the durability of the ladle is increased. An object of the present invention is to provide a construction method of a refractory for ladle lining which can be improved and is suitable for construction on site.
【0009】[0009]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明者等は、従来のマ
グネシア・カ−ボン質れんが(定形耐火物)に匹敵する耐
用性を有する流し込み材を、現場施工にて築炉するため
に鋭意検討を重ねた結果、本発明を完成したものであ
る。即ち、本発明に係る取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の施
工方法は、 ・取鍋施工枠内に、可使時間を2時間以上に調製した不
定形耐火物からなる流し込み材を投入充填して施工体を
形成し、該施工体を含む取鍋缶体それ自体を前記可使時
間内に真空処理装置にて減圧処理すること(請求項1)、
を特徴とし、 ・前記真空処理装置が、溶鋼処理用(二次精錬用)として
通常用いられているものであること(請求項2)、 を特徴とする。Means for Solving the Problems The inventors of the present invention have been keen to construct a castable material having a durability comparable to that of conventional magnesia-carbon brick (regular refractory) by on-site construction. As a result of repeated studies, the present invention has been completed. That is, the ladle lining according to the present invention is a method for forming an amorphous refractory for lining a ladle, into a ladle construction frame, charging and charging a casting material comprising an amorphous refractory with a pot life of 2 hours or more. Forming a construction body, and ladle can itself including the construction body is decompressed by a vacuum processing device within the pot life (claim 1),
Wherein the vacuum processing apparatus is normally used for molten steel processing (for secondary refining) (claim 2).
【0010】また、前記取鍋施工枠として、 ・孔径2〜10mmの孔が1m以内のピッチで配設され
た施工枠を使用すること(請求項3)、 ・鋼鉄製のネットからなる施工枠を使用すること(請求
項4)、を特徴とし、さらに、 ・前記取鍋施工枠の前記流し込み材の施工面側に、厚さ
2mm以上のセラミックファイバ−製織布または不織布
を貼付した施工枠を使用すること(請求項5)、 を特徴とする取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の施工方法であ
る。[0010] Further, as the ladle construction frame, a construction frame in which holes having a hole diameter of 2 to 10 mm are arranged at a pitch of 1 m or less (claim 3); a construction frame made of a steel net (Claim 4), and furthermore, a construction frame in which a ceramic fiber woven or nonwoven fabric having a thickness of 2 mm or more is adhered to the construction surface side of the casting material of the ladle construction frame. (Claim 5). A method for constructing a refractory for ladle lining, the method comprising:
【0011】[0011]
【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明について詳細に説明
すると、本発明に係る施工方法は、特に二次精錬用取鍋
の内張りを現場で施工するのに好適な方法である。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be described in detail below. The construction method according to the present invention is particularly suitable for constructing a secondary refining ladle on-site.
【0012】ところで、二次精錬用取鍋では、高温度で
長時間の処理を行うため、この取鍋の内張り用耐火物
は、苛酷な使用条件にさらされることになる。この耐火
物として流し込み材(不定形耐火物)を使用する場合、従
来のマグネシア・カ−ボン質れんが(定形耐火物)に匹敵
する耐用性を得るためには、緻密な施工体を現場施工に
て築炉することが必要である。By the way, in the ladle for secondary refining, the refractory for lining the ladle is exposed to severe use conditions because the ladle is subjected to a long-time treatment at a high temperature. When using a cast material (amorphous refractory) as this refractory, in order to obtain a durability comparable to that of conventional magnesia-carbon brick (a regular refractory), a dense construction body must be used on site. It is necessary to build a furnace.
【0013】そこで、本発明は、具体的には、予め施工
枠内に投入・充填した流し込み材(施工体)を、二次精錬
装置として使用されている真空処理装置内に取鍋缶体・
施工体・施工枠ごと収容し、可使時間内に減圧処理する
ことを特徴とし、この減圧処理により、施工体中の気泡
を脱気し、緻密な施工体を得ることにある。Accordingly, the present invention specifically relates to a ladle can and a casting material (construction body) charged and filled in a construction frame in advance in a vacuum processing apparatus used as a secondary refining apparatus.
It is characterized in that the construction body and the construction frame are housed and decompressed within the usable time, and that the decompression process removes bubbles in the construction body and obtains a dense construction body.
【0014】施工枠としては、減圧時の脱気を促進させ
るため、孔径2〜10mmの孔が1m以内のピッチで配
設された施工枠や鋼鉄製のネット(パンチングメタル,
エクスパンドメタルなど)を用いた施工枠の使用が好ま
しい。上記施工枠において、減圧時の脱気を促進するた
めの孔やネット幅は、施工時に流し込み材が漏れない範
囲であればよく、一般に使用される流し込み材の場合、
10mmの孔やネット幅でも問題はないが、これが2m
mより小さい場合には、真空処理装置内で減圧処理する
際の減圧効果が孔が開いていない施工枠と同様になり、
脱気し難いので好ましくない。As a construction frame, in order to promote deaeration during depressurization, a construction frame in which holes having a diameter of 2 to 10 mm are arranged at a pitch of 1 m or less or a steel net (punching metal,
It is preferable to use a construction frame using expanded metal. In the above construction frame, the hole or net width for promoting degassing during decompression is sufficient as long as the casting material does not leak during construction, and in the case of a commonly used casting material,
There is no problem with a hole or net width of 10 mm, but this is 2 m.
If less than m, the decompression effect at the time of decompression processing in the vacuum processing device will be the same as the construction frame without holes,
It is not preferable because deaeration is difficult.
【0015】また、流し込み施工体と施工枠との隙間か
ら脱気を促進させるため、流し込み材の施工面側に通気
性の高いセラミックファイバ−製織布または不織布を貼
付した施工枠も使用することができる。セラミックファ
イバ−製織布または不織布の厚さは2mm以上が望まし
く、これ未満では、流し込み材により上記織布または不
織布が押しつぶされ、施工体と施工枠との隙間が減少
し、脱気し難いので好ましくない。[0015] Further, in order to promote deaeration from the gap between the casting construction body and the construction frame, a construction frame having a highly permeable ceramic fiber woven or nonwoven fabric attached to the construction surface side of the casting material is also used. Can be. The thickness of the ceramic fiber-woven fabric or nonwoven fabric is desirably 2 mm or more. If the thickness is less than 2 mm, the woven fabric or nonwoven fabric is crushed by the casting material, the gap between the construction body and the construction frame is reduced, and it is difficult to deaerate. Not preferred.
【0016】本発明に係る施工方法は、まず、可使時間
を2時間以上に調製した流し込み材に水を4〜8重量%
添加・混練し、施工枠内に投入充填して施工体を形成す
る。可使時間が2時間未満では、施工中に流し込み材の
凝集が始まり、減圧処理を行っても脱気が不十分となる
ため好ましくない。可使時間の上限については、本発明
で特に限定するものではないが、15時間内が好まし
い。その理由は、15時間以上の可使時間の場合、施工
枠の脱枠までに長時間を要するため、取鍋運用面に問題
が発生することがあるからである。なお、可使時間と
は、ワ−キングタイム(作業可能時間)ないし流動性維持
時間を意味する。[0016] In the construction method according to the present invention, first, 4-8% by weight of water is added to a casting material whose pot life is adjusted to 2 hours or more.
It is added, kneaded, and charged and filled into a construction frame to form a construction body. If the pot life is less than 2 hours, the poured material starts to aggregate during the construction, and the deaeration becomes insufficient even if the pressure reduction treatment is performed, which is not preferable. The upper limit of the pot life is not particularly limited in the present invention, but is preferably within 15 hours. The reason is that in the case of a pot life of 15 hours or more, it takes a long time to remove the construction frame, which may cause a problem on the ladle operation side. The working time means a working time (workable time) or a fluidity maintenance time.
【0017】流し込み材を施工枠内に投入充填する際、
充分な充填性を得るため、ユ−ラスモ−タ,棒状バイブ
レ−タ,板状バイブレ−タなどを併用することが好まし
い。施工枠内に投入充填た後、直ちに取鍋缶体ごと真空
処理装置(二次精錬装置として使用されている真空処理
装置)に収容し、380torr以下の減圧状態下で減圧処理す
る。この減圧処理時においても、例えば施工枠にユ−ラ
スモ−タを配設し、該モ−タを作動させて振動を付与す
ることが好ましく、より一層の緻密化効果が生じるので
望ましい。When the casting material is charged into the construction frame,
In order to obtain a sufficient filling property, it is preferable to use a urethane motor, a rod-shaped vibrator, a plate-shaped vibrator or the like in combination. Immediately after being charged and filled in the construction frame, the ladle cans are housed together in a vacuum processing device (a vacuum processing device used as a secondary refining device) and subjected to a reduced pressure treatment under a reduced pressure of 380 torr or less. Even during the decompression treatment, it is preferable to provide a vibration motor by arranging, for example, a urasu motor on the construction frame, and it is desirable because a further densification effect is produced.
【0018】本発明において、流し込み材(不定形耐火
物)としては、特に限定するものではないが、アルミナ
・マグネシア質流し込み材やマグネシア・カ−ボン質流
し込み材などを使用することができる。In the present invention, the pouring material (amorphous refractory) is not particularly limited, but an alumina / magnesia pouring material or a magnesia / carbon pouring material can be used.
【0019】[0019]
【実施例】次に、本発明の実施例を比較例と共に挙げ、
本発明に係る施工方法をより詳細に説明する。Next, examples of the present invention will be described together with comparative examples.
The construction method according to the present invention will be described in more detail.
【0020】(実施例1〜8,比較例1〜2)各種の鋼鉄
製施工枠を使用した場合の「施工枠面から背部にかけて
の施工体(流し込み材)の見掛気孔率」の変化について調
べた。その結果を図1,図2に示す。(Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2) Changes in "apparent porosity of a construction body (cast material) from the construction frame surface to the back" when various steel construction frames are used Examined. The results are shown in FIGS.
【0021】施工枠として、次の(1)〜(4)を使用した
(図1,図2参照)。 (1) 通常の鋼鉄製施工枠 (2) 有孔鋼鉄製施工枠(孔径:3mm,ピッチ:500mm) (3) 鋼鉄製ネットからなる施工枠(ネット幅:5mm) (4) セラミックファイバ−貼付鋼鉄製板(ファイバ−
厚:5mm)The following (1) to (4) were used as construction frames.
(See FIGS. 1 and 2). (1) Normal steel construction frame (2) Perforated steel construction frame (hole diameter: 3 mm, pitch: 500 mm) (3) Construction frame made of steel net (net width: 5 mm) (4) Ceramic fiber-attached Steel plate (fiber
(Thickness: 5mm)
【0022】取鍋内張り施工は次のようにして行った。
取鍋缶体に上記(1)〜(4)の施工枠を配設し、この施工枠
内に、一般壁部に適用されているアルミナ・マグネシア
質流し込み材と、スラグライン部に適用されているマグ
ネシア・カ−ボン質流し込み材の2種類の流し込み材を
投入し充填し、直ちに取鍋缶体ごと真空処理装置に収容
し、100torr、1時間、減圧養生した(実施例1〜8)。
比較のため、上記真空処理装置を使用せず、単に大気圧
のもとで養生した場合についても行った(比較例1,
2)。なお、図1に示す実施例1〜4,比較例1で使用
したアルミナ・マグネシア質および図2に示す実施例5
〜8,比較例2で使用したマグネシア・カ−ボン質流し
込み材について、その化学成分,施工水分量,可使時間
を表1に示した。The ladle lining work was performed as follows.
The construction frame of (1) to (4) above is arranged in the ladle can, and in this construction frame, the alumina / magnesia pouring material applied to the general wall and the slag line are applied. And two kinds of magnesia and carbonaceous pouring materials were charged and filled, and the ladle cans were immediately accommodated in a vacuum processing apparatus and cured under reduced pressure at 100 torr for 1 hour (Examples 1 to 8).
For comparison, a case was also conducted in which the composition was simply cured under the atmospheric pressure without using the above vacuum processing apparatus (Comparative Example 1,
2). The alumina-magnesia used in Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Example 1 shown in FIG. 1 and Example 5 shown in FIG.
Table 1 shows the chemical composition, working water content, and pot life of the magnesia-carbonaceous casting material used in Comparative Examples 2 to 8.
【0023】[0023]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0024】図1,図2から、本発明に係る施工方法
(各種施工枠を用い、流し込み材を充填した取鍋缶体ご
と真空処理装置で減圧処理する方法)で得た施工体は、
見掛気孔率が露出面(稼働面)より缶体(鉄皮)方向に向っ
て緩やかに高くなる傾向がみられるが、その見掛気孔率
は、いずれの施工枠を使用した場合も全体として低いこ
とが判明した(実施例1〜8)。これに対し、減圧処理を
行わず単に大気圧のもとで養生した比較例1,2では、
実施例1,5に比して、見掛気孔率が大きく緻密ではな
いことが判明した。From FIGS. 1 and 2, the construction method according to the present invention is shown.
The construction body obtained by (method of decompressing the ladle can body filled with the pouring material using a vacuum treatment device using various construction frames)
The apparent porosity tends to increase gradually in the direction of the can (steel) from the exposed surface (operating surface), but the apparent porosity, as a whole, no matter which construction frame is used It was found to be low (Examples 1 to 8). On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1 and 2, which were cured under the atmospheric pressure without performing the decompression treatment,
It was found that the apparent porosity was large and not dense as compared with Examples 1 and 5.
【0025】(実施例9〜17,比較例3〜4)施工水分
量,可使時間,鋼鉄製施工枠,養生時の真空度などを変
えて内張り施工した場合の施工体の耐溶損性および取鍋
の耐用性を調べた。ここでは、いずれも20tonの二次精
錬用取鍋で行った例である。(Examples 9 to 17, Comparative Examples 3 and 4) The erosion resistance and the erosion resistance of a construction body when lining construction is performed by changing the construction moisture content, pot life, steel construction frame, degree of vacuum during curing, etc. The durability of the ladle was examined. Here, all are examples performed using a 20-ton ladle for secondary refining.
【0026】表2に示す化学成分からなる不定形耐火物
(流し込み材)を調製し、表2に示すように施工調整(施
工水分量,可使時間)を行った後、表2に示す施工枠に
投入した。これを直ちに取鍋缶体ごと真空処理装置に収
容し、同じく表2に示す減圧状態で1時間、減圧養生し
た(実施例9〜17)。この場合の取鍋寿命(ch)および
最大損傷深さ(mm/ch)を表2に示す。なお、比較の
ため、大気圧のもとで養生した場合についても行った
(比較例3,4)。Amorphous refractories consisting of the chemical components shown in Table 2
(Poured material) was prepared and subjected to construction adjustment (construction water content, usable time) as shown in Table 2, and then put into a construction frame shown in Table 2. This was immediately stored in a vacuum processing apparatus together with the ladle can, and was similarly cured under reduced pressure shown in Table 2 for 1 hour (Examples 9 to 17). Table 2 shows the ladle life (ch) and the maximum damage depth (mm / ch) in this case. Note that, for comparison, a test was also carried out on curing under atmospheric pressure.
(Comparative Examples 3 and 4).
【0027】[0027]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0028】上記表2から、本発明の施工方法に係る実
施例9〜17では、二次精錬用取鍋の寿命は40〜65c
h,最大損傷深さは1.5〜2.5mm/chであり、従来の
マグネシア・カ−ボン質れんがに匹敵する特性を有して
いることが判明した。これに対して、単に大気圧養生の
みによる比較例3,4では、取鍋寿命が25ch,35c
h、最大損傷深さが4.0mm/ch,2.9mm/chであ
り、対応する実施例9,12に比して著しく劣るもので
あった。From Table 2 above, in Examples 9 to 17 according to the construction method of the present invention, the life of the ladle for secondary refining is 40 to 65 c.
h, the maximum damage depth was 1.5 to 2.5 mm / ch, and it was found that the material had properties comparable to those of conventional magnesia-carbon brick. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 3 and 4 using only atmospheric pressure curing, the ladle life was 25 ch, 35 c
h, the maximum damage depths were 4.0 mm / ch and 2.9 mm / ch, which were significantly inferior to the corresponding Examples 9 and 12.
【0029】[0029]
【発明の効果】本発明は、以上詳記したように、取鍋施
工枠内に、可使時間を2〜10時間に調製した不定形耐火
物からなる流し込み材を投入充填して施工体を形成し、
該施工体を含む取鍋缶体それ自体を前記可使時間内に真
空処理装置にて減圧処理することを特徴とし、これによ
り、施工体の充填密度を高め、見掛気孔率を低下させる
ことにより、取鍋の耐用性を向上させることができ、従
来のマグネシア・カ−ボン質れんが(定形耐火物)に匹敵
する耐用性を有する効果が生じる。そして、本発明によ
れば、現状の溶鋼処理装置として用いられている真空処
理装置をそのまま使用することができるので、減圧処理
のための設備投資が不要であり、しかも現場施工にて築
炉することができる利点を有する。According to the present invention, as described in detail above, a casting material composed of an irregular-shaped refractory whose pot life is adjusted to 2 to 10 hours is charged and filled into a ladle construction frame. Forming
The ladle can itself including the construction body is subjected to a reduced pressure treatment by a vacuum treatment device within the pot life, thereby increasing the packing density of the construction body and reducing the apparent porosity. Thereby, the durability of the ladle can be improved, and the effect of having a durability comparable to that of the conventional magnesia-carbon brick (regular refractory) is produced. Further, according to the present invention, the vacuum processing apparatus used as the current molten steel processing apparatus can be used as it is, so that no capital investment is required for the decompression treatment, and the furnace is built on site. Can have the advantages.
【図1】各種の鋼鉄製施工枠を使用した場合の「施工枠
面から背部にかけての施工体(流し込み材)の見掛気孔
率」の変化を示す図であって、実施例1〜4,比較例1
を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a change in “apparent porosity of a construction body (cast material) from the construction frame surface to the back” when various steel construction frames are used, and Comparative Example 1
FIG.
【図2】図1と同様な図であって、実施例5〜8,比較
例2を示す図である。FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1, showing Examples 5 to 8 and Comparative Example 2.
フロントページの続き (72)発明者 金重 利彦 岡山県備前市伊部873 (72)発明者 高倉 雄一 岡山県備前市東片上390 (72)発明者 田淵 幸春 岡山県岡山市西片岡732 (72)発明者 杉原 忠史 兵庫県明石市朝霧北町1110−3Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Toshihiko Kanaeshi 873 Ibe, Bizen-shi, Okayama Prefecture (72) Inventor Yuichi Takakura 390, Higashi-Katagami, Bizen-shi, Okayama Prefecture (72) Inventor Yukiharu Tabuchi 732, Nishikataoka 732, Okayama Prefecture Okayama Prefecture (72) Inventor Sugihara Tadashi 1110-3 Asagiri Kitamachi, Akashi City, Hyogo Prefecture
Claims (5)
に調製した不定形耐火物からなる流し込み材を投入充填
して施工体を形成し、該施工体を含む取鍋缶体それ自体
を前記可使時間内に真空処理装置にて減圧処理すること
を特徴とする取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の施工方法。1. A ladle can body including a ladle construction frame, wherein a casting material made of an amorphous refractory having a pot life of at least 2 hours is charged and filled into a ladle construction frame to form a construction body. A method for constructing a refractory for ladle lining, wherein the refractory itself is subjected to a reduced pressure treatment by a vacuum treatment device within the pot life.
して通常使用されている真空処理装置であることを特徴
とする請求項1に記載の取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の施
工方法。2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the vacuum processing apparatus is a vacuum processing apparatus generally used as a secondary refining apparatus.
mの孔が1m以内のピッチで配設された施工枠を使用す
ることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の取鍋内張り用不定
形耐火物の施工方法。3. The ladle construction frame, wherein a hole diameter is 2 to 10 m.
The construction method of the refractory for ladle lining according to claim 1, wherein a construction frame in which m holes are arranged at a pitch of 1 m or less is used.
からなる施工枠を使用することを特徴とする請求項1に
記載の取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の施工方法。4. The method according to claim 1, wherein a construction frame made of a steel net is used as the ladle construction frame.
面側に、厚さ2mm以上のセラミックファイバ−製織布
または不織布を貼付した施工枠を使用することを特徴と
する請求項1に記載の取鍋内張り用不定形耐火物の施工
方法。5. A laminating frame comprising a ceramic fiber woven fabric or a non-woven fabric having a thickness of 2 mm or more attached to the ladle laminating frame on the side of the pouring material. The construction method of the irregular shaped refractory for ladle lining described.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP29642596A JP3477012B2 (en) | 1996-11-08 | 1996-11-08 | On-site construction method for irregular shaped refractories for ladle lining |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP29642596A JP3477012B2 (en) | 1996-11-08 | 1996-11-08 | On-site construction method for irregular shaped refractories for ladle lining |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH10141866A true JPH10141866A (en) | 1998-05-29 |
JP3477012B2 JP3477012B2 (en) | 2003-12-10 |
Family
ID=17833382
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP29642596A Expired - Fee Related JP3477012B2 (en) | 1996-11-08 | 1996-11-08 | On-site construction method for irregular shaped refractories for ladle lining |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3477012B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN100389911C (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2008-05-28 | 崔东瑞 | Casing patch method for ladle brickwork neck bush |
CN100389910C (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2008-05-28 | 崔东瑞 | Ladle neck bush pouring technique |
CN100389912C (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2008-05-28 | 崔东瑞 | Construction method for ladle integral pouring and casing pouring liner |
JP2009013457A (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2009-01-22 | Nippon Steel Engineering Co Ltd | Method for manufacturing inductor |
-
1996
- 1996-11-08 JP JP29642596A patent/JP3477012B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN100389911C (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2008-05-28 | 崔东瑞 | Casing patch method for ladle brickwork neck bush |
CN100389910C (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2008-05-28 | 崔东瑞 | Ladle neck bush pouring technique |
CN100389912C (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2008-05-28 | 崔东瑞 | Construction method for ladle integral pouring and casing pouring liner |
JP2009013457A (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2009-01-22 | Nippon Steel Engineering Co Ltd | Method for manufacturing inductor |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3477012B2 (en) | 2003-12-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JPH10141866A (en) | Laying method for unshaped refractory for lining of ladle | |
US6165926A (en) | Castable refractory composition and methods of making refractory bodies | |
US3963815A (en) | Method of lining molten metal vessels and spouts with refractories | |
JP2004144690A (en) | Method and apparatus for testing expansibility of steel slag | |
CN109400192A (en) | Utilize the method for waste magnesia carbon brick production refining ladle liner magnesia carbon brick | |
JP7416117B2 (en) | Castable refractories and ladle | |
JP7376724B2 (en) | castable refractories | |
JPWO2018061731A1 (en) | Plate refractory for sliding nozzle and method of manufacturing the same | |
CN1017042B (en) | Thixotropic refractory material and method and apparatus for applying same to metallurgical vessel lining by vibration | |
JP4252658B2 (en) | Ladle lining irregular refractory construction method | |
JP3774557B2 (en) | Refractory for injecting inert gas into molten metal and method for producing the same | |
JPS62132606A (en) | Method of molding ceramics and carbon material | |
AU742062B2 (en) | Castable refractory composition and methods of making refractory bodies | |
JPH10279357A (en) | Lining material for induction furnace | |
JPH10140230A (en) | Immersion tube for vacuum degassing apparatus | |
JP2704249B2 (en) | Basic amorphous refractories for induction furnaces | |
JPH11291213A (en) | Method for forming castable refractory block | |
KR100913156B1 (en) | A method of manufacturing castable block | |
KR950012399B1 (en) | Maldistribution check method of an in determinate from refractory | |
SU533572A1 (en) | Method of making ceramic products | |
JP2695038B2 (en) | Method for pouring molten metal container | |
RU2080962C1 (en) | Method of removing slag crust in hot metal ladle cars | |
JP3439909B2 (en) | Lining structure of vacuum molten steel processing equipment | |
JPH0225965B2 (en) | ||
JPH04265283A (en) | Method for press-molding castable refractory |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080926 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |