JPH09257671A - Method for inspecting outer surface defect of ceramic - Google Patents
Method for inspecting outer surface defect of ceramicInfo
- Publication number
- JPH09257671A JPH09257671A JP6591896A JP6591896A JPH09257671A JP H09257671 A JPH09257671 A JP H09257671A JP 6591896 A JP6591896 A JP 6591896A JP 6591896 A JP6591896 A JP 6591896A JP H09257671 A JPH09257671 A JP H09257671A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- ceramic
- crack
- cracks
- visual
- confirmed
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、セラミックの微細
な表面クラックを検出するためのセラミックの外表面欠
陥検査方法に関し、特に内燃機関の排ガス浄化用および
微粒子浄化用の触媒担体用フィルタ、各種ガス・石油を
燃料とする燃焼ガスおよび/または脱臭用フィルタとし
て用いられるセラミックハニカム構造体の端面の欠陥検
査方法に関するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a ceramic outer surface defect inspection method for detecting fine surface cracks in a ceramic, and particularly to a catalyst carrier filter for purifying exhaust gas and fine particles of an internal combustion engine, and various gases. The present invention relates to a method for inspecting defects on an end surface of a ceramic honeycomb structure used as a combustion gas that uses petroleum as a fuel and / or a deodorizing filter.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来から、特に内燃機関の排ガス浄化用
および微粒子浄化用の触媒担体用フィルタ、各種ガス・
石油を燃料とする燃焼ガスおよび/または脱臭用フィル
タとして用いられるセラミックハニカム構造体等のセラ
ミックの外表面の欠陥を検査し、不良品を除去する必要
がある。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a catalyst carrier filter for purifying exhaust gas and fine particles of an internal combustion engine, various gases,
It is necessary to remove defects by inspecting for defects on the outer surface of a ceramic such as a ceramic honeycomb structure used as a combustion gas that uses petroleum as a fuel and / or a deodorizing filter.
【0003】現在実用化されているセラミックの外表面
のクラック検出方法として、最も古典的な人の目による
目視法、ルーペまたは実体顕微鏡による方法、画像処理
を利用したパターン認識法、セラミックに液体を塗り発
色剤を添加してクラックを認識するカラーチェック法、
蛍光剤による蛍光探傷法、さらには金属で軽く叩くとク
ラックのないものは金属音がするのに対しクラックの存
在するものは音が濁ることを利用した打音法等が知られ
ている。The most classical methods for detecting cracks on the outer surface of ceramics, which are currently in practical use, are the most classical methods of visual inspection by the human eye, methods using a magnifying glass or a stereoscopic microscope, pattern recognition methods utilizing image processing, and liquids applied to ceramics. Color check method that recognizes cracks by adding a coloring agent,
Known methods include a fluorescent flaw detection method using a fluorescent agent, and a tapping method that utilizes the fact that a metal without a crack produces a metallic sound when tapped lightly, whereas a metal with a crack has a muddy sound.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】実際のクラックのう
ち、目視法では容易に検出できない微細な表面クラック
がセラミックにとっては一般的に有害であり、そのよう
なクラックをも検出する必要がある。ところが、カラー
チェック法および蛍光探傷法では発色または蛍光の材料
費用とチェック後の洗浄にコストが掛かることに加え、
多孔質材料には微細な孔でも発色または蛍光を発してし
まい表面クラックとの区別ができなくなる問題があっ
た。Among actual cracks, fine surface cracks that cannot be easily detected by visual inspection are generally harmful to ceramics, and it is necessary to detect such cracks. However, in addition to the cost of coloring or fluorescent material and the cost of cleaning after checking, the color check method and the fluorescent flaw detection method require
The porous material has a problem that even minute pores emit color or fluorescence and cannot be distinguished from surface cracks.
【0005】また、打音法では目視法で容易に検出でき
ないような微細な表面クラックでは、たとえクラックが
発生していても音が変化せず、クラックを検出すること
が出来ない問題があった。同様に、パターン認識法でも
微細な表面クラックを十分に検出出来ない問題があっ
た。このようなクラックを唯一検出出来るのが実体顕微
鏡等による方法であるが、この方法も検出精度を上げよ
うとして倍率を上げれば、視野が狭くなり広い範囲の検
査に時間がかかり、短時間に検査しようと倍率を下げれ
ば検出精度が悪くなるという問題があった。Further, in the case of fine surface cracks which cannot be easily detected by visual inspection by the tapping method, there is a problem that even if cracks occur, the sound does not change and the cracks cannot be detected. . Similarly, the pattern recognition method has a problem that it cannot detect fine surface cracks sufficiently. The only method that can detect such cracks is with a stereomicroscope, etc., but this method also narrows the field of view and takes a long time to inspect a wide range if the magnification is increased in order to increase the detection accuracy. There was a problem that the detection accuracy deteriorates if the magnification is reduced in an attempt.
【0006】本発明の目的は上述した課題を解消して、
ルーペまたは実体顕微鏡等を用いずに短時間に精度良く
セラミックの微細な表面クラックを検出することができ
るセラミックの外表面欠陥検出方法を提供しようとする
ものである。An object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems,
An object of the present invention is to provide a ceramic outer surface defect detection method capable of accurately detecting fine surface cracks of a ceramic in a short time without using a loupe or a stereoscopic microscope.
【0007】[0007]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明のセラミックの外
表面欠陥検出方法は、セラミックの外表面に機械的応力
を加え、外表面のクラック部分を欠かすことにより、欠
陥を検査することを特徴とするものである。The method of detecting an outer surface defect of a ceramic according to the present invention is characterized in that a defect is inspected by applying a mechanical stress to the outer surface of the ceramic so as to remove a crack portion on the outer surface. To do.
【0008】本発明では、セラミックの外表面におい
て、欠陥の無い部分に比べ欠陥のある部分が機械的応力
に対し欠けやすい性質を利用している。すなわち、セラ
ミックの外表面における欠陥を機械的応力をかけること
により強制的に欠かすことで、欠陥の存在する外表面は
欠けを生じ、欠陥の存在しない外表面は欠けの発生が無
いことから、目視で欠陥の有無を容易に検出することが
できる。The present invention utilizes the property that the defective portion of the outer surface of the ceramic is more likely to be chipped by mechanical stress than the defective portion. That is, by forcibly eliminating the defects on the outer surface of the ceramic by applying mechanical stress, the outer surface having the defects causes a chip, and the outer surface having no defects does not have a defect. With, it is possible to easily detect the presence or absence of a defect.
【0009】[0009]
【発明の実施の態様】セラミックの表面クラックには、
外表面で口を開けている大きなクラックと、密着してい
て口の開いていない微細なクラックとが存在する。口を
開けているクラックは、顕微鏡を使用しなくとも目視法
やパターン認識法でも容易に検出することができる。し
かし、口を開けていないクラックはいずれの方法を用い
ても十分に検出することができず、特に多孔質材料では
クラックか孔かを判別することが難しい。本発明では、
これらの口を開けていないクラックを機械的応力をかけ
ることにより強制的に例えばV字形状に欠かすことで、
目視でもこれらのクラックを容易に判別することができ
る。そのため、多孔質材料を用いたセラミックハニカム
構造体に最適な方法となる。BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
There are large cracks with open mouths on the outer surface, and fine cracks that are in close contact with no open mouth. A crack with an open mouth can be easily detected by a visual method or a pattern recognition method without using a microscope. However, cracks with no open mouth cannot be sufficiently detected by any of the methods, and it is particularly difficult to determine whether they are cracks or holes in a porous material. In the present invention,
By forcing these open cracks into a V-shape by applying mechanical stress,
These cracks can be easily identified by visual inspection. Therefore, it is an optimal method for a ceramic honeycomb structure using a porous material.
【0010】なお、機械的応力を加える方法として、表
面研磨またはサンドブラストを用いることが好ましい。
表面研磨の場合、連続面にクラックが入っているとき
は、砥石の抵抗によりまたは砥石の粒がクラックに引っ
かかることにより、クラック部分が欠けV字状または片
V字状の溝を作る。ハニカム構造体の端部の場合は、ク
ラックが入っている部分の隔壁は他の部分が両端固定梁
状態であるのに対し片持ち梁状態となり、低い強度で破
壊するためV字状の溝が形成される。Surface polishing or sandblasting is preferably used as a method for applying mechanical stress.
In the case of surface polishing, when the continuous surface has cracks, the resistance of the grindstone or the particles of the grindstone are caught in the cracks to form a V-shaped or one-sided V-shaped groove. In the case of the end portion of the honeycomb structure, the partition wall in the cracked portion is in a cantilever state while the other portions are in a beam state in which both ends are fixed, and a V-shaped groove is formed to break with low strength. It is formed.
【0011】方法の使い分けは、表面が少しでも荒れて
はまずい場合は表面研磨を用い、少し荒れても良い場合
はサンドブラストを用いる。また、表面研磨を用いる場
合は、研磨により摩耗する分予め研磨代を設けておけば
よい。As for the proper use of the methods, surface polishing is used when the surface is not rough even slightly, and sandblasting is used when the surface is rough. Further, when surface polishing is used, a polishing allowance may be provided in advance due to abrasion by polishing.
【0012】[0012]
【実施例】以下に本発明の実施例を説明する。図1に形
状を示すコージェライト多孔質材料を用いたハニカム構
造体1を準備した。ハニカム構造体の形状は、直径10
1.6mmで長さ127.0mmであり、以下の表1に
示す各種セル構造(隔壁厚さ/セル数)を用いた。準備
したハニカム構造体を900℃に保った電気炉に入れ6
0分間保持した後室内に取り出しクラックのチェックを
行った。Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. A honeycomb structure 1 using a cordierite porous material having a shape shown in FIG. 1 was prepared. The honeycomb structure has a diameter of 10
The length was 1.6 mm and the length was 127.0 mm, and various cell structures (partition wall thickness / number of cells) shown in Table 1 below were used. Place the prepared honeycomb structure in an electric furnace maintained at 900 ° C. 6
After holding for 0 minute, it was taken out into the room and checked for cracks.
【0013】クラックのチェックは、まず全数について
目視チェックと打音チェックを行った。次に、目視チェ
ックでクラックが認められなかった試料を20倍の実体
顕微鏡でチェックを行った。その後、目視・実体顕微鏡
でクラックが確認された試料およびクラックが確認され
なかった試料をそれぞれ半数に分け、半数のハニカム構
造体の端面を研磨加工するとともに他の半数の端面をサ
ンドブラスト加工し、目視チェックを行った。The cracks were checked first by visual check and tapping sound check. Next, the sample in which no crack was found by visual check was checked with a 20-fold stereomicroscope. After that, divide the sample in which cracks were confirmed with a visual / stereoscopic microscope and the sample in which no cracks were confirmed into half, and polish the end faces of half the honeycomb structure and sandblast the other half face, and visually I checked.
【0014】研磨加工は、ダイヤモンド粒を接着させた
砥石を2000回/分にて回転させ、試料を5mm/分
にて送り込み、約1.0mm研磨した。サンドブラスト
加工は、ショット材にナイロンまたはポリプラスを用
い、直径9mmのエアーガンから3kgf/cm2 の圧
力で試料端面から100mm離して5〜10秒ショット
材を吹き付けた。吹き付け時間に差があるのは、隔壁の
機械的強度の差により吹き付け時間を変化させる必要が
あるためであり、壁厚の薄い試料No.1と材料気孔率
が43%と大きい試料No.4は5秒、その他は10秒
で実施した。クラック検出の結果を以下の表1に示す。In the polishing process, a grindstone to which diamond grains were adhered was rotated at 2000 times / minute, the sample was fed at 5 mm / minute, and polishing was performed for about 1.0 mm. In the sandblasting process, nylon or polyplus was used as the shot material, and the shot material was sprayed for 5 to 10 seconds at a pressure of 3 kgf / cm 2 from an air gun having a diameter of 9 mm at a distance of 100 mm from the end surface of the sample. The reason why there is a difference in the spraying time is that it is necessary to change the spraying time depending on the difference in the mechanical strength of the partition walls. Sample No. 1 having a large material porosity of 43%. It was carried out in 5 seconds for 4 and 10 seconds for others. The results of crack detection are shown in Table 1 below.
【0015】[0015]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0016】その結果、研磨加工、サンドブラスト加工
とも目視で確認できなかった微細クラック3の部分が、
図2に示すようにハニカム構造体1の端面2からV字形
状の切り欠きとなり、目視で十分確認可能な状態となっ
た。また、従来の目視チェック、打音チェック、実体顕
微鏡によるチェックと比較して、本発明の研磨またはサ
ンドブラスト後チェックした場合は、検出に要する時間
も短縮できることがわかった。As a result, the portion of the fine cracks 3 which could not be visually confirmed by both the polishing process and the sandblasting process,
As shown in FIG. 2, a V-shaped notch was formed from the end surface 2 of the honeycomb structure 1, and the state was sufficiently visible. It was also found that the time required for detection can be shortened in the case of the check after polishing or sandblasting of the present invention, as compared with the conventional visual check, tapping check, and check using a stereoscopic microscope.
【0017】本発明は上述した実施例にのみ限定される
ものではなく、幾多の変形、変更が可能である。例え
ば、本実施例ではセラミックハニカム構造体として径方
向の断面形状が正円のものを使用したが、これに限定さ
れるものではなく、例えば楕円形状等他の形状のもので
も本発明を好適に適用できることはいうまでもない。ま
た、材質についても、本実施例ではコージェライトを用
いたがこれに限定されるものでないことはいうまでもな
い。さらに、上述した実施例ではセラミックハニカム構
造体についての結果を示したが、同様の結果を他のセラ
ミック体でも得ることができることはいうまでもない。
さらに、研磨加工条件、サンドブラスト加工条件も、材
質、セル構造により加工体の状態が異なるため、実施例
に制限されるものではない。The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, but can be variously modified and changed. For example, although a ceramic honeycomb structure having a circular cross-section in the radial direction is used in this embodiment, the present invention is not limited to this, and the present invention is preferably applied to other shapes such as an elliptical shape. It goes without saying that it can be applied. Further, regarding the material, cordierite is used in the present embodiment, but it goes without saying that the material is not limited to this. Furthermore, although the above-mentioned examples show the results for the ceramic honeycomb structure, it is needless to say that the same result can be obtained for other ceramic bodies.
Further, the polishing processing conditions and the sandblasting processing conditions are not limited to the examples because the state of the processed body differs depending on the material and the cell structure.
【0018】[0018]
【発明の効果】以上の説明から明らかなように、本発明
によれば、セラミックの外表面における欠陥を機械的応
力をかけることにより強制的に欠かしているため、目視
で判別困難で実体顕微鏡でないと判別困難な微細クラッ
クを非常に短時間で判別可能になる。As is apparent from the above description, according to the present invention, the defects on the outer surface of the ceramic are forcibly missing by applying mechanical stress, so that it is difficult to discriminate visually and it is not a stereoscopic microscope. It becomes possible to distinguish minute cracks that are difficult to distinguish in a very short time.
【図1】本発明の実施例において使用したハニカム構造
体を示す斜視図である。FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing a honeycomb structure used in an example of the present invention.
【図2】本発明によりV字状となったハニカム構造体の
クラック部の拡大図である。FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of a crack portion of a V-shaped honeycomb structure according to the present invention.
1 ハニカム構造体、2 端面、3 クラック 1 honeycomb structure, 2 end faces, 3 cracks
Claims (4)
外表面のクラック部分を欠かすことにより、欠陥を検査
することを特徴とするセラミックの外表面欠陥方法。1. A mechanical stress is applied to an outer surface of a ceramic,
A ceramic outer surface defect method, characterized by inspecting for defects by removing cracks on the outer surface.
ニカム構造体の端面である請求項1記載のセラミックの
外表面欠陥検査方法。2. The method for inspecting an outer surface defect of a ceramic according to claim 1, wherein the outer surface of the ceramic is an end surface of a ceramic honeycomb structure.
ある請求項1または2記載のセラミックの外表面欠陥検
査方法。3. The method for inspecting outer surface defects of ceramics according to claim 1, wherein the method of applying the mechanical stress is surface polishing.
ストである請求項1または2記載のセラミックの外表面
欠陥検査方法。4. The method for inspecting outer surface defects of ceramics according to claim 1, wherein the method of applying the mechanical stress is sandblasting.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP08065918A JP3081527B2 (en) | 1996-03-22 | 1996-03-22 | External surface defect inspection method for ceramics |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP08065918A JP3081527B2 (en) | 1996-03-22 | 1996-03-22 | External surface defect inspection method for ceramics |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH09257671A true JPH09257671A (en) | 1997-10-03 |
JP3081527B2 JP3081527B2 (en) | 2000-08-28 |
Family
ID=13300841
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP08065918A Expired - Fee Related JP3081527B2 (en) | 1996-03-22 | 1996-03-22 | External surface defect inspection method for ceramics |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3081527B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005144284A (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-06-09 | Ngk Insulators Ltd | Ceramic honeycomb structure |
CN107576585A (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2018-01-12 | 淮阴工学院 | Ceramic test piece hot machining experimental method |
US10475177B2 (en) | 2015-10-06 | 2019-11-12 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Method of inspecting surface of ceramic body |
-
1996
- 1996-03-22 JP JP08065918A patent/JP3081527B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005144284A (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-06-09 | Ngk Insulators Ltd | Ceramic honeycomb structure |
JP4504660B2 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2010-07-14 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Ceramic honeycomb structure |
CN107576585A (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2018-01-12 | 淮阴工学院 | Ceramic test piece hot machining experimental method |
CN107576585B (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2018-12-14 | 淮阴工学院 | Ceramic test piece hot machining experimental method |
US10475177B2 (en) | 2015-10-06 | 2019-11-12 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Method of inspecting surface of ceramic body |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3081527B2 (en) | 2000-08-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107991455B (en) | Reliable method for inspecting and researching cracks of HIC (hydrogen induced crack) sample | |
JP5038293B2 (en) | Method for inspecting outer wall of honeycomb structure | |
EP1380830A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting cracks in honeycomb structure | |
EP0445962A2 (en) | Method of inspecting a honeycomb structural body for purifying exhaust gases and apparatus used in the method | |
US7325308B2 (en) | Processing method utilizing display information for carrying a cell structure with a catalytic component | |
JP2807370B2 (en) | Inspection method and apparatus for pressure loss during regeneration of exhaust gas purifying honeycomb structure | |
EP1096249A3 (en) | Nondestructive inspection method and apparatus | |
JP4665039B2 (en) | Honeycomb structure defect inspection apparatus and honeycomb structure defect inspection method | |
EP2031378A1 (en) | Method of detecting porous material defect | |
JP6032142B2 (en) | Defect inspection method for honeycomb structure | |
US6025536A (en) | Process of manufacturing a cobalt-chromium orthopaedic implant without covering defects in the surface of the implant | |
JPH09257671A (en) | Method for inspecting outer surface defect of ceramic | |
Morrell | Fractography of brittle materials. | |
US5883512A (en) | Checking heat exchanger tubes with an eddy-current integrity test | |
CN113740416B (en) | Engine crankshaft inspection method | |
JPH10123067A (en) | Method for inspecting defect of porous body | |
JP2003309048A (en) | Inspecting method and inspecting apparatus of electronic component | |
JP5526973B2 (en) | Filter evaluation method and evaluation apparatus | |
JP2001098925A (en) | Exhaust emission control device and filter therefor | |
McKeighan et al. | Characterizing the cracking behavior of hard alpha defects in rotor grade Ti-6-4 alloy | |
JP2001524669A (en) | Inspection method for machined products | |
CN112161885A (en) | Steel rail accelerated fatigue degradation experimental method | |
RU2038922C1 (en) | Method of making sintered filtering material | |
Quinn et al. | Machining Damage Cracks: How to Find and Characterize Them by Fractography | |
JP2014094318A (en) | Method of producing ceramic honeycomb filter and ceramic honeycomb filter |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20000523 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080623 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090623 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100623 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100623 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110623 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120623 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130623 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140623 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |