JPH08262033A - Judgment processing system - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: To obtain a judgment processing system by which the test result of a product can be judged precisely and with high accuracy by a method wherein the test state of the product is controlled and a standard value and a control value are set so as to support a judgment. CONSTITUTION: A first judgment means 16 displays a test result so as to correspond to the test item of a product name, and, when a judgment result is proper, the test state of the test item is set in such a way that a first judgment has been finished. A second judgment means 17 displays the test state of all test items of a product name whose first judgment has been finished, and, when an overall judgment result is proper, the test state is set in such a way that a second judgment has been finished. When the test result is displayed, values outside a standard value and a control value which have been set by a test-item check master 8 by product name are displayed emphatically as outside the standard value and the control value. In addition, when the test result is within the standard value but outside the control value, the test result is set in such a way that a test has not been made, and a retest is instructed 18. The test state of a product is controlled by a test progress file 11, the standard value and the like are set 8, and whether the test result is proper or not is displayed emphatically so as to support a judgment. Consequently, the test result can be judged preceisly and efficiently.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a judgment processing system for judging a test result of a product.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a product is tested in a series of steps in which raw materials are received, a product is manufactured, a predetermined test is carried out, and a test report stating the test result is attached to the product and shipped. The raw data (primitive data) of the analytical equipment used was manually referred to determine the suitability or unsuitability as the test result.

[0003]

As described above, conventionally, the original data obtained by testing a product using an analytical instrument is manually referred to determine the suitability or unsuitability as a test result. , Whether the original data was measured according to the test contents correctly, whether the original data corresponded to an unsuitable product outside the range of the control value, and further judge the overall result from the test results of individual test items, Was slightly out of the control value, and the administrator had to determine whether or not a retest was necessary, which was troublesome and error-prone.

The present invention solves these problems.
A test progress file is provided to manage the test status of the product (test not completed, test completed, first judgment completed, second judgment completed), set management values and standard values in the master to support judgment, and The purpose is to judge test results accurately and efficiently.

[0005]

FIG. 1 shows a conceptual block diagram of the present invention. In FIG. 1, the test progress file 11
Is to set the test item and its test state in association with the product name of the product.

The first judging means 16 judges (first judgment) the product name of the product, and individual test items and test results. The second determination means 17 makes a comprehensive determination (second determination) of the product name of the product and all the test items of the product name.

The item-by-product test item check master 8 sets the upper limit value and the lower limit value of the control value and the standard value in association with the test item of the product name of the product. The retest means 18 gives an instruction for a retest.

[0008]

According to the present invention, as shown in FIG.
6 displays the test result in association with the test item of the product name of the product, and sets the test state of the test item as the first judgment completed when appropriate in response to the input of the judgment result. When the test status is judged as the 1st judgment completed, the test status of all the test items of the product name is displayed and the test status is set as the 2nd judgment completed when it is appropriate in response to the input of the comprehensive judgment result. I am trying.

When this test result is displayed, when it is larger than the upper limit value of the standard value or smaller than the lower limit value of the standard value, or smaller than the upper limit value of the standard value and larger than the upper limit value of the control value, or When the value is larger than the lower limit value and smaller than the lower limit value of the control value, the test result is highlighted as out of the standard value or out of the control value.

Further, when the value is smaller than the upper limit value of the standard value and larger than the upper limit value of the control value or larger than the lower limit value of the standard value and smaller than the lower limit value of the control value, the retest means 18 sets the test state to untested. I am instructing them to retest.

Therefore, the test progress file 11 is provided to manage the test status (test untested, test completed, first judgment completed, second judgment completed) of the product, and the management item and standard value are set in the product item-specific test item check master 8. By setting and, when the value is out of the standard value or out of the control value / inside the standard value and highlighted to support the judgment, it becomes possible to judge the test result of the product accurately and efficiently.

[0012]

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Next, the construction and operation of an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to FIGS.

FIG. 1 shows a conceptual block diagram of the present invention.
In FIG. 1, a server 4 manages a product, includes a data management unit 5 that manages various data, and manages masters 7 to 11 and data and files shown in the drawing.

The product name master 7 sets the presence or absence of a sampling instruction, the test location, the number of test days, the test method, etc. in association with the product product name code (see FIG. 4).
The product-name-specific test item check master 8 sets the upper limit value and the lower limit value of the standard value and the control value for the test item in association with the product name code of the product (see FIG. 9).

The test result data 9 stores the test result in association with the product name code of the product (see FIG. 7). The test item search file for each product name 10 sets test items in association with the product name code of the product (see FIG. 6).

The test progress file 11 sets the test status (untested, under test, first judged, second judged) for each test item in association with the product name and lot of the product ( (See FIG. 5).

The client 15 is connected to the server 4 via a LAN and performs various processes. The client 15 has a first judging means 16, a second judging means 17, and a retesting means 18.
It is composed of etc.

The first judging means 16 judges (first judgment) the individual test items of each lot of the product name based on the test data. The second judging means 17 makes a comprehensive judgment (second judgment) based on the test states of all the test items for each lot of the product name.

The re-testing means 18 re-tests each test item of each lot of the product name when it is within the standard value and out of the control value (which will be described later with reference to the flowchart of FIG. 8). ).

The client 21 is the same as the client 15 and is connected to the server 4 and other clients via the LAN. Next, the operation of the configuration of the embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail according to the order shown in the flowchart of FIG.

FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for explaining the operation of the present invention. In FIG. 2, S1 waits for the first determination. This determines whether there is an instruction to perform the first determination. YE
In the case of S, the process proceeds to S2 to make the first determination. On the other hand, if NO, the process proceeds to S9.

In S2, a test place is selected. This is the test site: 1. Physics and Chemistry (raw material / raw material) 2. Physics and chemistry (products / formulations) 3. Select one of the organisms (rabbit, guinea pig). For example, "raw material" is selected on the screen of FIG.

In S2 ', the judge is input. This inputs the name of the judge who makes the first judgment. For example, the judgment person No. “9999” (9 is an arbitrary number) is input on the screen of FIG.

In S2 '', the password is input. For example, the password “XXX” is displayed on the screen of FIG.
Input X "(X is an arbitrary number or symbol). S3 is to select and display the product name / lot. For example, the arbitrary first determination of the product name / lot No. on the screen of FIG. Select the one you want to do.

In S4, it is determined whether or not it is a batch determination. This is S
It is discriminated whether or not there is an instruction as to whether or not to collectively judge a plurality of test items of the product name and lot number selected in 3.
In the case of YES, it is determined to be a batch judgment, so the judgment result for each test item (from the lower limit value to the upper limit value of the control value) for the first judgment input of S5, that is, all the test items of product name / lot No. In response to the input of the determination result (appropriate when not fit and not suitable when not fit), the corresponding test state of the test progress file 11 in FIG. 6 is set to “first determined”. Then, the process proceeds to S13. On the other hand, S4
In the case of NO, it was found that it was not a collective judgment, so
The test item is selected in S6, and the judgment result of the test item selected in S7 (the judgment result which is appropriate when the management value falls between the lower limit value and the upper limit value and is unsuitable when the management value does not fall within the control value) is input. Correspondingly, the test progress file 11 of FIG.
Set the corresponding test status of "1st judgment completed", S8
If NO, the process returns to S6 and repeats for each test item, while if YES, the process proceeds to S13.

If YES in S1 and S2 to S7 described above, the test item for each lot number of the product name is referred to as "appropriate" when it is within the control value range, and the test progress file 11 of FIG. "1st judgment completed" is set to the test state of the test item of the lot number of the corresponding product name. This makes it possible to set the determination result (first determination result) for each test item without forgetting all the test items of the lot number of the product name.

In step S9, it is determined whether the first determination has been completed. this is,
It is determined whether or not there is a designation that the second determination will be performed for the first determination completed. In the case of YES, the second determination is made in S10 to S12. On the other hand, if NO, S13
Proceed to.

In step S10, a test place is selected. this is,
As a test place, 1. Physics and Chemistry (raw material / raw material) 2. Physics and chemistry (products / formulations) 3. Select one of the organisms (rabbit, guinea pig, etc.). For example, "raw material" is selected on the screen of FIG.

In step S10 ', the judge is input. this is,
Enter the name of the judge who will make the second judgment. For example, the judgment person No. “9999” (9 is an arbitrary number) is input on the screen of FIG.

In S10 '', the password is input. For example, the password "XX is displayed on the screen of FIG.
Input XX "(X is an arbitrary number or symbol). S11
Selects and displays the product name and lot. For example, on the screen of FIG. 3 (d) described later, one item for which an arbitrary second determination of the product name / lot No. is to be performed is selected.

In S12, the second judgment is input. For this, the second judgment is input by referring to the first judgment results of all the test items of product name / lot No. For example, "second determination completed" is set to the test state of the lot number of the corresponding product name in the test progress file 11 of FIG. 6 described later, the determination date is set, and the determination result is set. Then, the process proceeds to S13.

NO of S1 above, YES of S9, S10
From S12 to S12, the second determination, which is a comprehensive determination, is performed on the lot number of the product name, and "second determination completed" is set to the test status of the test item of the lot number of the corresponding product name in the test progress file 11 of FIG. Set the day, and set the judgment result (appropriate, unsuitable, or judged). With these, when all of the test items for each lot number of the product name have been determined as the first determination, the second determination is performed, and the overall determination result (second determination completed, determination date, determination content (suitable, unsuitable, (Determined)) can be set.

FIG. 3 shows an example of the screen of the present invention. this is,
An example of an actual screen when performing processing according to the flowchart of FIG. 2 is shown. FIG. 3A shows the screen of the MAIN menu. This is a main screen for selecting the determination process of FIG. 2, and when “test determination” is selected on the screen, the process of the flowchart of FIG. 2 is activated.

FIG. 3B shows a classification selection screen.
This is the screen at the time of S2 and S10 in FIG. 2, and here shows the state where “raw material” is selected as the test place.

FIG. 3C shows a classification selection screen.
This is S2 ', S2'',S10', S1 in FIG.
It is a screen at the time of 0 '', and here, it shows that "9999" (9 is an arbitrary number) as a judge number, "XXXX" (X is an arbitrary symbol or number) is input as a password. .

FIG. 3D shows a screen for selecting the product name / lot number. This is the screen at the time of S3 and S11 in FIG. 2, and here, as the product name and lot number, "salicylamido, Y00
The figure shows that 1 "is selected.

FIG. 3E shows the product name at the time of the first judgment.
The screen which displays a lot number is shown. This is S in FIG.
In the case of 3 and S6, the test items to be the target of the first determination are displayed.

3F to 3N are auxiliary function screens (window screens) used in the first determination.
FIG. 3F shows a screen for selecting a retry item. When the instruction to execute the measurement is selected again on this screen, "untested" is set in the test status column of the test progress file 11 in FIG. 6, and the retest is instructed.

FIG. 3G shows a screen for inputting remarks.
This is a screen for creating an abnormality report on this screen.
FIG. 3H shows a screen for displaying request information. Request information such as the process code, receipt slip, and manufacturing date is displayed on this screen.

FIG. 3I shows a screen for displaying implementation information. The test method, scheduled date, etc. are displayed on this screen as shown. FIG. 3 (j) shows a screen for displaying related information. Related information such as request code, product name code, and receipt slip is displayed on this screen.

FIG. 3 (k) shows a screen for displaying the original data. On this screen, the raw data (raw data taken from the analytical instrument) is displayed at S7 in FIG. 2, and the measured value is displayed in association with the lot number of the product name.

FIG. 3 (l) shows the first judgment screen. Select either suitable or unsuitable on this screen. (M) of FIG. 3 shows a first determination end confirmation screen. On this screen, all the test items for the product name lot shown in the figure have been completed. Is displayed.

FIG. 3N shows a forced termination screen. On this screen, do you do the illustrated forced termination screen? Is displayed, and either the "Yes" or "No" button is displayed.

FIG. 4 shows an example of a product name master of the present invention. The product name master 7 has the following items set therein. Product code 1101156 (salicylamido code) (Note: salicylamide is a colorless crystal with acidity and sweetness, and is an organic compound produced by protein hydrolysis. Used as a preservative, dye, and perfume. Be done).

-Sampling instruction 0: None (consignment) 1: Yes (collection) -Test location 1: Physicochemical (prodrug / raw material) 2: Physicochemical (product / formulation) 3: Biological (rabbit, guinea pig, etc.)-Number of test days Number of days required for testing-Inventory classification 1: Final product 2: Other than final product-Material category 0: Other than material 1: Material Figure 5 shows an example of a test progress file of the present invention. The test progress file 11 sets and manages the test states of all the test item numbers for each lot number of the product name,
The settings are as shown below.

Product name Lot No. Test item No. Test status Request date Judgment date Judgment result Salicylamide Y001 001 1 Where: ・ Test status 0: Not tested 1: Testing in progress 2: 1st judgment completed 3: 2nd judgment completed -Judgment result 1: Appropriate 2: Not suitable 3: Judged Fig. 6 shows an example of a test item search file by product name of the present invention. The test item search file 11 for each product name has a test item number set in association with a product name code.
The settings are as shown below.

Product name code Test item No. 1101157 001 Here, ・ Product name code 1101157 (Product name code of salicylamide) ・ Test item No. 001 (Property) are shown.

FIG. 7 shows an example of test result data of the present invention. This test result data 9 sets the following items shown in the figure. Product name Lot NO Test item Test content Test measured value Test date Salicylamide Y001 Appearance White crystal-99 / 99/99 Purity test Ammonium 0.005% 99/99/99 Where the control value is out of the range, The test measurement value is highlighted in yellow, and if it is out of the standard value range, the test measurement value is highlighted in red.

FIG. 8 shows a first determination flowchart of the present invention. This is a detailed flowchart for the first determination in S5 of FIG. In FIG. 8, S21 determines whether the value is outside the control value or within the standard value. This is because the test result of the first determination target, for example, the test measurement value in the test result data 9 of FIG. 7, is the standard value and the upper limit of the standard value set in the product name-specific test item check master 8 of FIG. 9 described later. It is determined whether the value is out of the control value or within the standard value (range in FIG. 9) obtained from the lower limit value. In the case of YES, it is determined that the range is out of the control value and within the standard value, so a retest request is made in S23 and S2
In step 4, the test status is set to untested (0), that is, the test status of the corresponding test item in the test progress file 11 in FIG.
Set to (Untested) and set to the untested state. On the other hand, S2
If NO in step 2, the process proceeds to step S25.

In step S25, it is determined whether the value is within the control value. this is,
It is determined whether the value is within the control value shown in FIG. In the case of YES, the test result is found to be within the control value, so appropriate is set in S26,
The test status is set to the first determined (2), that is, the test status of the corresponding test item in the test progress file 11 of FIG.
Set to (first determined) and set to first determined. on the other hand,
In the case of NO in S25, it was found to be out of specification, so S2
In step 7, the unsuitability is set, that is, 2 (unsuitable) is set in the judgment result of the corresponding test item in the test progress file 11 in FIG.

Based on the above, referring to the test item check master 8 for each product name in FIG. 9, the test result is determined based on the upper limit value and the lower limit value of the control value and the standard value of the test item of the lot number of the corresponding product name. When the test progress file 11 is out of the standard, it is unsuitable, when it is out of the control value / standard, the retest request and the test status are set to "0 (untested)", and when it is within the control value, the test status “2 (first judgment completed)”
Set to. With these, the judgment result is tested progress file 1 according to the out-of-specification value, out-of-control value / in-standard, within-control value.
It is possible to set the value to 1 and start the subsequent processing.

FIG. 9 shows an example of a product name-specific test item check master according to the present invention. Test item check master by product name 8
Is the upper limit value, the lower limit value of the control value, and the upper limit value of the standard value,
The lower limit is set as shown below.

Control value Standard value Product name Test item Upper limit value Lower limit value Upper limit value Lower limit value Salicylamide Purity test L11 L21 L31 L41 (Ammonium) Salicylamide ph value L12 L22 L32 L42 Here, the control value is stricter than the standard value. I am trying.
Using the standard value and the control value, the test result in the range of is highlighted in yellow, and the test result in the range outside the standard value is highlighted in red.

[0054]

As described above, according to the present invention,
The test progress file 11 is provided to manage the test status of the product (test untested, test completed, first judgment completed, second judgment completed), and set management values and standard values in the product name-specific test item check master 8 to establish standards. Since a structure is adopted in which the value is displayed outside the control value, outside the control value, and within the standard value to support the judgment, the test result of the product can be judged accurately and efficiently.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a conceptual block diagram of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart explaining the operation of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a screen example of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is an example of a product name master of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an example of a test progress file of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is an example of a test item search file for each product name according to the present invention.

FIG. 7 is an example of test result data of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a first determination flowchart of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is an example of a test item check master according to product name of the present invention.

[Explanation of symbols]

 4: Server 5: Data management means 7: Product name master 8: Product name-specific test item check master 9: Test result data 10: Product name-specific test item search file 11: Test progress file 15, 21: Client 16: First determination means 17 : Second judging means 18: Retest procedure

Claims (3)

[Claims] 1. A test progress file that sets a test item and its test status in association with a product name of a product, and a test result is displayed in association with a test item of a product name of a product,
First determination means for setting the test state of the relevant test item to the first determination completed when appropriate in response to the input of the determination result, and all the product names when the test state is determined to be the first determination completed Determination processing system for displaying the test state of the test item of No. 2 and setting the test state as the second determination completed when appropriate in response to the input of the comprehensive determination result. . 2. A master for setting the upper limit value and the lower limit value of the control value and the standard value in association with the test item of the product name of the product, and a master value which is larger than the upper limit value of the standard value when the test result is displayed. The test result is outside the standard value when it is smaller than the lower limit value of the standard value, or smaller than the upper limit value of the standard value and larger than the upper limit value of the control value, or larger than the lower limit value of the standard value and smaller than the lower limit value of the control value. Alternatively, the determination processing system according to claim 1, further comprising means for highlighting as a value outside the control value. 3. When the test value is smaller than the upper limit value of the standard value and larger than the upper limit value of the control value or larger than the lower limit value of the standard value and smaller than the lower limit value of the control value, the test state is set to untested and re-tested. The determination processing system according to claim 2, further comprising means for instructing a test.