JPH0798619B2 - Elevator group management device - Google Patents

Elevator group management device

Info

Publication number
JPH0798619B2
JPH0798619B2 JP1160714A JP16071489A JPH0798619B2 JP H0798619 B2 JPH0798619 B2 JP H0798619B2 JP 1160714 A JP1160714 A JP 1160714A JP 16071489 A JP16071489 A JP 16071489A JP H0798619 B2 JPH0798619 B2 JP H0798619B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
car
predicted
cars
allocation
call
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP1160714A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0326672A (en
Inventor
伸太郎 辻
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP1160714A priority Critical patent/JPH0798619B2/en
Priority to US07/538,359 priority patent/US5083640A/en
Priority to CN90103320A priority patent/CN1019288B/en
Priority to KR1019900009487A priority patent/KR930004754B1/en
Priority to GB9014214A priority patent/GB2235312B/en
Publication of JPH0326672A publication Critical patent/JPH0326672A/en
Priority to SG76794A priority patent/SG76794G/en
Priority to HK66794A priority patent/HK66794A/en
Publication of JPH0798619B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0798619B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 [産業上の利用分野] この発明は,複数台のエレベータのかごの中から乗場呼
びにに対するサービスかごを選択し割り当てるエレベー
タの群管理装置に関するものである。
TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to an elevator group management device for selecting and allocating a service car for a landing call from a plurality of elevator cars.

[従来の技術] 複数台のエレベータが併設された場合は,通常群管理運
転が行われる。この群管理運転の一つに割当方式がある
が,これは乗場呼びが登録されると直ちに各かご毎に割
当評価値を演算し,この評価値が最良のかごをサービス
すべきかごとして選択して割り当て,上記乗場呼びには
割当かごだけを応答させるようにして,運行効率の向
上,および乗場待時間の短縮を計るものである。また,
このような割当方式の群管理エレベータにおいては,一
般に各階の乗場に各かごおよび各方向毎に到着予報灯を
設置し,これにより乗場待客に対して割当かごの予報表
示を行うようにしているので,待客は安心して予報かご
の前でかごを待つことができる。
[Prior art] When multiple elevators are installed side by side, normal group management operation is performed. There is an allocation method as one of the group management operations. It calculates the allocation evaluation value for each car as soon as the hall call is registered, and selects the car with the best evaluation value as the car to service. By assigning only the assigned car to the above-mentioned landing call, the operation efficiency is improved and the waiting time for the landing is shortened. Also,
In such group-controlled elevators of the allocation method, generally, an arrival forecast light is provided for each car and each direction at the landing on each floor so that the forecast of the allocated car is displayed to the passengers waiting at the landing. Therefore, waiting customers can wait for the car in front of the forecast car with peace of mind.

さて,上記のような乗場呼びの割当方式における割当評
価値は,現在の状況がそのまま進展するとしたらどのか
ごに乗場呼びを割り当てたら最適かという観点に基づい
て演算されている。すなわち,現在のかご位置とかご方
向,および現在登録されている乗場呼びやかご呼びに基
づいて,かごが上記呼びに順次応答して各階の乗場に到
着するまでに要する時間の予測値(以下,これを到着予
想時間という)と,乗場呼びが登録されてから経過した
時間(以下,これを継続時間という)を求め,さらに上
記到着予想時間と上記継続時間を加算して現在登録され
ているすべての乗場呼びの予測待時間を演算する。そし
て,これらの予測待時間の総和もしくは予測待時間の2
乗値の総和を割当評価値として設定し,この割当評価値
が最小となるかごに上記乗場呼びを割り当てる。このよ
うな従来の方式では,乗場呼びの割当を行う場合,現在
の状況の延長線上で最適か否かを判断しているためにそ
の割当の後に新たに登録された乗場呼びが長待ちになる
という不具合が発生していた。
By the way, the allocation evaluation value in the hall call allocation method as described above is calculated from the viewpoint of which car is best to allocate the hall call if the current situation progresses as it is. That is, based on the current car position and car direction, and the currently registered landing call and car call, the predicted value of the time required for the car to sequentially respond to the above calls and arrive at the landing on each floor (hereinafter, This is called the estimated arrival time) and the time that has elapsed since the hall call was registered (hereinafter referred to as the continuation time), and the estimated arrival time and the continuation time are added together and all currently registered. Calculate the estimated waiting time of the hall call. Then, the sum of these predicted waiting times or the predicted waiting time of 2
The sum of the product values is set as the assigned evaluation value, and the hall call is assigned to the car with the smallest assigned evaluation value. In such a conventional method, when allocating a hall call, the newly registered hall call after the allocation becomes long waiting because it is judged whether or not it is optimal on an extension of the current situation. There was a problem that.

この不具合発生の例を第12図〜第15図によって説明す
る。第12図において,AおよびBは,それぞれ1号機およ
び2号機のかごで,1号機は6階のかこ呼び(6c)に応答
すべく上昇中であり,2号機は5階の上り呼び(5u)に割
り当てられており,上り割当(5uB)に応答すべく上昇
中である。このような状況において,第13図のように9
階に下り呼び(9d)が登録されたとする。上記従来の割
当方式の割当評価値に従うと,全体として待時間が最小
になるようにかごAに9階の下り呼び(9d)を割り当て
るため,1号機は9階の下り割当(9dA)を持ち,その結
果2台とも上方に向かって走行することになる。
An example of this failure occurrence will be described with reference to FIGS. 12 to 15. In Fig. 12, A and B are the cars of Units 1 and 2, respectively, Unit 1 is in the process of rising to respond to the 6th floor call (6c), and Unit 2 is the 5th floor upcall (5u ), And is rising to respond to the uplink allocation (5uB). In such a situation, as shown in FIG.
It is assumed that the down call (9d) is registered on the floor. According to the allocation evaluation value of the above conventional allocation method, since the 9th floor downlink call (9d) is allocated to car A so that the waiting time is minimized as a whole, Unit 1 has the 9th floor downlink allocation (9dA). As a result, both cars will drive upward.

もし、この9階の下り呼び(9d)の割当後しばらくして
下方階に,例えば1階に上り呼び(1u)が登録されたと
すると,この1階の上り呼び(1u)はかごAおよびかご
Bの背後呼びとなり,いずれのかごに割り当てられたと
しても応答されるまでに時間がかかり長待ちになってし
まうことになる。
If the up call (1u) is registered on the lower floor, for example, on the first floor shortly after the allocation of the down call (9d) on the ninth floor, the up call (1u) on the first floor is assigned to the car A and the car. It becomes the back call of B, and even if it is assigned to any of the cars, it takes a long time to be answered and a long wait occurs.

一方,9階の下り呼び(9d)をかごBに割り当てた場合,
約15秒後には第14図のようにかごAは6階で空かごにな
って待機状態になり,かごBは5階でサービス中(この
階で10階のかご呼び(10c)が登録されたとする)と予
想される。したがって,その後に1階の上り呼び(1u)
が登録されたとしても,第15図に示すように6階で待機
しているかごAが直行サービスするので長待ちになるこ
とはない。このように長待ちを防止するには,近い将来
のかご配置がどうなるのか,空かごが生じる可能性はど
うかを考慮し,一時的に待時間が長くなる割当を行って
でも,かごが1か所に集まらないように乗場呼びを割り
当てる必要がある。
On the other hand, if the 9th floor downcall (9d) is assigned to car B,
After about 15 seconds, as shown in Fig. 14, car A becomes an empty car on the 6th floor and is in a standby state, and car B is in service on the 5th floor (the car call (10c) on the 10th floor is registered on this floor). Expected). Therefore, after that, the first floor upcall (1u)
Even if the car is registered, as shown in Fig. 15, car A waiting on the 6th floor does not have to wait long because car A provides direct service. In order to prevent long waits in this way, considering how cars will be laid out in the near future and the possibility of empty cars occurring, even if a long waiting time is assigned, the number of cars will be one. It is necessary to assign hall calls so that people do not gather at the place.

[発明が解決しようとする課題] 従来,かごが1か所に集まらないように乗場呼びを割り
当てる方式が次に述べるようにいろいろ提案されてきた
が,十分な効果が得られていない。
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] Conventionally, various methods have been proposed as described below for assigning hall calls so that cars do not gather in one place, but sufficient effects have not been obtained.

特公昭55−326525号公報に示されているエレバータの群
管理装置は,上記ゾーン割当方式と同様に,かごが1か
所に集まることを防ぎ運転効率の向上を計るために,乗
場呼びが登録されるとその呼びの近くの階床に停止する
予定のあるかごを割り当てるという割当方式である。こ
の割当方式においても,近接階への停止予定かごの有無
に注目しているのみで,停止予定かごがその階に到着す
るまでにどのくらいの時間を要するのか,他の乗場呼び
がどのように分布して登録されていていつ頃応答されそ
うであるのか,近い将来空かごになりそうなかごはない
のか,他のかごはどの階にいてどの方向に運行しようと
しているのか,など時間経過に伴うかご配置の変化など
を適確にとらえた判断を行っていないので,やはり長待
ち呼びが発生するという問題点があった。
The Elevata group control device disclosed in Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. Sho 55-326525 has a hall call registration to prevent the cars from gathering in one place and improve the driving efficiency, as in the above zone allocation system. It is an assignment method that assigns a car scheduled to stop to the floor near the call. In this allocation method as well, only attention is paid to the presence / absence of a car to be stopped on the adjacent floor, and how long it takes for the car to be stopped to reach that floor and how other hall calls are distributed. It has been registered and will be answered soon, there is no car that is likely to become an empty car in the near future, and which floor is the other car on which direction are you going to operate? Since we did not make a judgment that accurately grasped changes in the car layout, there was the problem that long wait calls would still occur.

さらにまた,特公昭62−56076号公報に示されたエレベ
ータの群管理制御方法は,乗り捨て位置にかごを待機さ
せるものにおいて,新たに乗場呼びが発生するとこの乗
場呼びを順次各かごに仮に割り当てて仮割当かごの乗り
捨て位置を予想し,仮割当かごの予想乗り捨て位置とそ
の他のかごの位置からかごの分散度を演算し,少なくと
も上記分散度を各割当かごの評価値として分散度が大き
いほど割り当てられやすくなるようにして,各かごの上
記評価値から割当かごを決定するようにした割当方式で
ある。これにより,乗場呼びにサービス終了後も分散配
置された状態となり,分散待機による空かごの無駄運転
を防止して省エネルギーに大きな効果を発揮すると共に
ビル居住者の不審感をなくすことができるという効果を
有するものである。しかし,この割当方式はその目的か
ら明らかなように,夜間などの閑散時を対象とするもの
で,かごが全て空かごで待機している状態で乗場呼びが
一つ登録された場合を前提としている。そのため,乗場
呼びが次々に登録され各かごが呼びに応答しながらそれ
ぞれ運行しているというような交通状態における乗場呼
び割当にはこの割当方式を適用できず,長待ちが発生す
るという問題点があった。すなわち,このような問題が
生じるのは,空かごの配置をバランスさせることを目的
としているため,仮割当かご以外のかごに対し時間経過
に伴うかご位置の変化を考慮する構成になっていない
(その前提からして他のかごのかご位置変化を考慮する
必要がない)こと,および上記仮割当かごが乗り捨てら
れる時点のかご位置(その時点には全てのかごが空かご
となり待機状態となる)にのみ着目して乗場呼び割当の
判断をしていることが原因である。
Furthermore, in the elevator group management control method disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 62-56076, in which a car is made to stand by at a drop-off position, when a new hall call is generated, this hall call is temporarily assigned to each car. Estimate the drop-off position of the temporarily assigned car, calculate the degree of dispersion of the car from the expected position of the temporary allocation car and the positions of other cars, and assign at least the above dispersion degree as the evaluation value of each assigned car as the degree of dispersion increases. This is an allocation method in which the allocated car is determined from the above-mentioned evaluation value of each car so as to be easily handled. As a result, the services will be distributed even after the service is finished at the hall calls, and it will be possible to prevent wasted operation of empty cars due to distributed standby, which will have a great effect on energy conservation and eliminate the suspicion of building residents. Is to have. However, as is clear from its purpose, this allocation method is intended for off-peak hours such as at night, and is premised on the case where one hall call is registered while all cars are waiting in the empty car. There is. Therefore, this allocation method cannot be applied to the landing call allocation in a traffic state in which landing calls are registered one after another and each car is operating while responding to the calls, resulting in long waiting. there were. In other words, such a problem arises because the purpose is to balance the placement of empty cars, so it is not configured to consider changes in car position over time for cars other than the provisionally assigned car ( Based on that assumption, it is not necessary to consider the car position change of other cars), and the car position at the time when the above-mentioned provisionally allocated car is abandoned (at that time, all cars become empty cars and are in a standby state) The reason is that the call allocation is decided by focusing only on.

さらにまた,昭和63年電気・情報関連学会(昭和63年10
月3日〜5日開催,会場:新潟大学工学部)において発
表された「エレベーターの群管理」(予稿集第2分冊P2
−117〜120)では,ファジイ理論を応用した新群管理方
式が提案されている。これには,ファジイルールの例と
して下記のものが示されている。
Furthermore, the Electrical and Information Related Society of Japan in 1988 (10
Held 3rd to 5th of the month, Venue: Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University "Elevator group management" (Proceedings Vol. 2 P2)
-117-120) proposed a new group management method that applies the fuzzy theory. Here are some examples of fuzzy rules:

(Rule Rm) IF (上方階に乗場呼び発生) and(あるかご(A)に割り当てると上方階にかごが集
中する) THEN (上記の性質(A)を持つかごを除いて割当候補かごと
する) (割当候補かごの中から評価値最小のかごを割り当て
る) さらに,シミュレーション例として第16図に示すような
状況で10Fの下り呼びが登録されたときには,空かごで
ある2号機と4号機を温存し,上方階にかご呼びを持つ
1号機と3号機の中から評価値に最も良いかご(3号
機)を割当かごに選択することが良いとしている。これ
に従えば近い将来の呼び発生を考慮した割当が行え長待
ちの発生を防止することができる。しかしながら,「上
方階にかごが集中する」という判定が単に「上方階にか
ご呼びを持つ」,または「上方階に割当呼びを持つ」と
いう条件だけで行われており,時間経過に伴うかご相互
の位置関係の変化を考慮する構成になっていない。その
ため,いずれは上方階に達するかもしれないが他のかご
との位置関係が明確に規定されていないため,実際にか
ごが「上方階に集中」しない場合も十分考えられ、その
場合には空かごを温存したがためにかえって待時間を長
くするという問題点があった。また,さらに,近い将来
に呼びに答え終わったあと戸閉状態で待機するであろう
というかご(=予測空かご)の発生予測を全く考慮して
いないため,近い将来の長待ちの発生の防止効果が十分
でないという問題点があった。
(Rule Rm) IF (calls occur on the upper floor) and (When assigned to a certain car (A), the cars concentrate on the upper floor) THEN (Exclude cars with the above properties (A) ) (Assigning the car with the smallest evaluation value from the allocation candidate cars) Furthermore, when a 10F down call is registered in the situation shown in Fig. 16 as a simulation example, empty cars No. 2 and No. 4 are It is said that it is good to select the car with the best evaluation value (Unit 3) from the Units 1 and 3 that have been saved and have a car call on the upper floor as the assigned car. According to this, allocation can be performed in consideration of call generation in the near future, and long wait can be prevented. However, the judgment that "the cars are concentrated on the upper floor" is made only on the condition that "the car has a call on the upper floor" or "the car has an assigned call on the upper floor". It is not configured to take into account changes in the positional relationship of. Therefore, the car may reach the upper floor eventually, but the positional relationship of other cars is not clearly defined. Therefore, it may be considered that the car may not actually "concentrate on the upper floor". In that case, However, there was a problem that the waiting time was rather lengthened because the car was preserved. In addition, since we do not consider the prediction of the occurrence of cars (= predicted empty cars) that will wait in the closed state after answering the call in the near future, we prevent the occurrence of long waits in the near future. There was a problem that the effect was not sufficient.

この発明は,かかる問題点を解決するためになされたも
ので,時間経過に伴ったかご配置の変化と空かごになる
可能性とを考慮し,現時点から近い将来にわたって乗場
呼びの待時間を短縮することのできるエレベータの群管
理装置を得ることを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in order to solve such a problem, and shortens the waiting time for a hall call from the present time to the near future in consideration of the change in the car layout with the passage of time and the possibility of becoming an empty car. It is an object of the present invention to obtain an elevator group management device that can be used.

[課題を解決するための手段] この発明に係るエレベータの群管理装置は、乗場釦が操
作されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手段と、前
記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべき
かごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの運行方向
決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御を行い、
かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させるかご制
御手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、応
答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごに対
して最終の呼びの階に到着するまでの到着予想時間をそ
れぞれ演算し、さらにこの到着予想時間に基づいて応答
すべき呼びに全て答え終わった状態になるまでの予測時
間を演算し、この予測時間が所定時間以内のかごを予測
空かごとして検出する予測空かご検出手段と、前記予測
空かごが検出されているとき、前記予測空かごを他のか
ごよりも乗場呼びに割り当てにくくするか又は前記予測
かごを割当対象から除外する割当制限動作を行う割当制
限手段とを備え、前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出
力に基づいて割当かごを選択するものである。
[Means for Solving the Problems] An elevator group management system according to the present invention includes a hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, and a plurality of cars for the hall call. Assigning means for selecting and allocating cars to be serviced, performing operation control such as car direction determination, departure, stop, door opening and closing,
In a group management device for an elevator equipped with a car call and a car control means for responding to the assigned hall call, a car that does not answer all the calls to be answered arrives at the final call floor The estimated time until arrival is calculated, and the estimated time until all the calls to be answered are answered based on this estimated time of arrival is calculated. Predictive empty car detection means for detecting as a car, and when the predicted empty car is detected, makes it more difficult to allocate the predicted empty car to a landing call than other cars or assigns to exclude the predicted car from allocation targets And an allocation restricting means for performing a restricting operation, wherein the allocation means selects an allocation car based on the output of the allocation restricting means.

また、別の発明に係るエレベータの群管理装置は、乗場
釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手段
と、前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービス
すべきかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの運
行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御を
行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させる
かご制御手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置におい
て、応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わった状態のかごを空
かごとして検出する空かご検出手段と、前記空かご以外
のかごのうち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに
全て答え終わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空
かごとして検出する予測空かご検出手段と、第2の所定
時間後のかご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するかご位置予測
手段と、このかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づい
て、前記第2の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾ
ーン毎にそれぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、前記予
測空かごが検出されているとき、前記空かごの有無と前
記かご台数予測手段による特定階又は特定ゾーンの予測
かご台数を条件とし、前記予測空かごを他のかごよりも
乗場呼びに割り当てにくくするか又は前記予測空かごを
割当対象から除外する割当制限動作を行う割当制限手段
とを備え、前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基
づいて割当かごを選択するものである。
An elevator group management device according to another invention selects a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for a car call registration unit that registers a car call when a car button is operated. Group management of elevators including allocation means for allocating the car and determining operation direction of the car, operation control such as departure, stop, door opening and closing, and car control means for making the car respond to the car call and the allocated hall call. In the device, an empty car detecting means for detecting an empty car as a car that has answered all calls to be answered, and answering all calls to be answered within a first predetermined time of the cars other than the empty car A predictive empty car detecting means for detecting a car expected to be in the finished state as a predictive empty car, a car position predicting means for predicting and calculating a car position after a second predetermined time, and this car. A car number predicting unit that predicts the number of cars after the second predetermined time has passed for each floor or zone based on the prediction calculation value of the storage predicting unit; and when the predicted empty car is detected, Based on the presence or absence of an empty car and the number of cars predicted on the specific floor or zone by the number-of-cars predicting means, it is more difficult to allocate the predicted empty car to a hall call than other cars, or the predicted empty car is assigned And an allocation limiting means for performing an allocation restriction operation to be excluded, wherein the allocation means selects an allocation car based on an output of the allocation restriction means.

さらに、別の発明に係るエレベータの群管理装置は、乗
場釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手
段と、前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービ
スすべきかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの
運行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御
を行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させ
るかご制御手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置にお
いて、応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態の
かごのうち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全
て答え終わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空か
ごとして検出する予測空かご検出手段と、第2の所定時
間後のかご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するかご位置予測手
段と、このかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、
前記第2の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン
毎にそれぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、前記予測空
かごが検出されているとき、前記かご台数予測手段によ
る特定階又は特定ゾーンの予測かご台数に基づいて、前
記予測空かごを他のかごよりも乗場呼びに割り当てにく
くする度合を割当制限値として設定する割当制限値設定
手段と、前記予測空かご検出手段、かご台数予測手段、
及び割当制限値設定手段を用いて、前記第2の所定時間
を複数の異なる値に設定したときの割当制限値をそれぞ
れ演算し、さらにそれらの割当制限値を組み合わせて総
合割当制限値を設定する割当制限手段とを備え、前記割
当手段は前記総合割当制限値に基づいて割当かごを選択
するものである。
Further, an elevator group management device according to another invention is a hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, and a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for the hall call. Group management of elevators including allocation means for allocating the car and determining operation direction of the car, operation control such as departure, stop, door opening and closing, and car control means for making the car respond to the car call and the allocated hall call. Prediction of a car that is expected to be in a state where all calls to be answered have been answered within the first predetermined time among cars that have not answered all calls to be answered in the device Based on the empty car detection means, the car position prediction means for predicting and calculating the car position after the second predetermined time, and the predicted calculation value of the car position prediction means,
A car number predicting unit that predicts the number of cars after the second predetermined time has passed for each floor or zone, and when the predicted empty car is detected, Based on the number of predicted cars, allocation limit value setting means for setting the degree of making the predicted empty car harder to allocate to landing calls than other cars as an allocation limit value, the predicted empty car detection means, car number prediction means,
And an allocation limit value setting means for calculating respective allocation limit values when the second predetermined time is set to a plurality of different values, and further combining these allocation limit values to set a total allocation limit value. Allocation limiting means, and the allocation means selects an allocation car based on the total allocation restriction value.

そして、別の発明に係るエレベータの群管理装置は、乗
場釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手
段と、前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービ
スすべきかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの
運行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御
を行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させ
るかご制御手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置にお
いて、応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態の
かごのうち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全
て答え終わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空か
ごとして検出する予測空かご検出手段と、第2の所定時
間後のかご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するかご位置予測手
段と、このかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、
前記第2の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン
毎にそれぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、階床の特性
あるいは過去の乗場呼び発生記録に基づいて、乗場呼び
が発生する頻度が高いか低いかを階床又はゾーン毎に判
定する交通状態判定手段と、前記予測空かごが検出され
ているとき、前記かご台数予測手段による特定階又は特
定ゾーンの予測かご台数と前記交通状態判定手段による
乗場呼びの発生頻度の判定結果に基づいて、前記予測空
かごに対する乗場呼びの割当制限動作を行う割当制限手
段とを備え、前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に
基づいて割当かごを選択するものである。
And an elevator group management device according to another invention selects a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for a car call registration means for registering a car call when a car button is operated. Group management of elevators including allocation means for allocating the car and determining operation direction of the car, operation control such as departure, stop, door opening and closing, and car control means for making the car respond to the car call and the allocated hall call. Prediction of a car that is expected to be in a state where all calls to be answered have been answered within the first predetermined time among cars that have not answered all calls to be answered in the device Based on the empty car detection means, the car position prediction means for predicting and calculating the car position after the second predetermined time, and the predicted calculation value of the car position prediction means,
The frequency of hall calls is high based on the number of cars predicting means for predicting the number of cars after the second predetermined time for each floor or zone and the characteristics of the floor or the past hall call generation record. Traffic condition judging means for judging whether each floor or zone is lower or lower, and when the predicted empty car is detected, the number of cars predicted on the specific floor or the specific zone by the car number predicting means and the traffic condition judging means Allocation control means for performing allocation control operation of the hall call to the predicted empty car based on the determination result of the frequency of occurrence of the hall call by the allocation means, the allocation means selecting an allocation car based on the output of the allocation restriction means. To do.

[作用] この発明においては、応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっ
ていない状態のかごのうち、所定時間以内に応答すべき
呼びに全て答え終わった状態になると予想されるかごを
予測かごとして検出し、前記予測空かごに対して割当制
限動作を行うようにしたので、近い将来にかごが1カ所
に集中することが少なくなる。その結果、乗場呼びの待
時間を短縮することができる。
[Operation] In the present invention, among the cars that have not finished answering all the calls to be answered, a car that is expected to be in a state where all the calls to be answered have been answered within a predetermined time is detected as a predictive car. Since the allocation limiting operation is performed on the predicted empty car, the cars are less likely to be concentrated in one place in the near future. As a result, the waiting time for a hall call can be shortened.

また、別の発明においては、空かごと予測空かごを検出
し、所定時間後の予測かご位置に基づいて前記所定時間
経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそれぞれ予測
し、前記空かごの有無と特定階又は特定ゾーンの前記予
測かご台数を条件として前記予測空かごに対して割当制
限動作を行うようにしたので、予測空かごに対して無駄
に割当制限を行うことが少なくなると同時に、近い将来
にかごが1カ所に集中することが少なくなる。その結
果、乗場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することができる。
In another invention, a predicted empty car and an empty car are detected, and the number of cars after the predetermined time has elapsed is predicted for each floor or zone based on the predicted car position after a predetermined time. Since the allocation restriction operation is performed on the predicted empty car on the condition of the presence or absence of the above and the predicted number of cars on the specific floor or in the specific zone, it is less likely that the allocation restriction is unnecessarily applied to the predicted empty car. , In the near future, it will be less likely that one car will be concentrated in one place. As a result, the waiting time for a hall call can be further shortened.

さらに、別の発明においては、所定時間後の予測かご位
置、階床又はゾーン毎の予測かご台数、及びこれに対応
した前記予測空かごに対する割当制限値を前記所定時間
を複数の異なる値に設定した場合についてそれぞれ演算
し、さらにそれらの割当制限値を組み合わせて総合相当
制限値を設定して予測空かごに対して割当制限動作を行
うようにしたので、予測空かごに対して無駄に割当制限
を行うことが少なくなると同時に、現時点から近い将来
に渡ってかごが1カ所に集中することも少なくなる。そ
の結果、乗場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することができ
る。
Further, in another invention, the predicted car position after a predetermined time, the predicted number of cars for each floor or zone, and the allocation limit value for the predicted empty car corresponding thereto are set to a plurality of different values for the predetermined time. In each case, the calculation is performed for each case, and the allocation limit values are combined to set the total equivalent limit value to perform the allocation limit operation for the predicted empty car. At the same time, there will be less chance to carry out the car, and at the same time from the present time to the near future, the car will not be concentrated in one place. As a result, the waiting time for a hall call can be further shortened.

そして、別の発明においては、所定時間後の予測かご位
置、及び階床又はゾーン毎の予測かご台数を演算すると
ともに、乗場呼びが発生する頻度が高いか低いかを階床
又はゾーン毎に判定し、前記予測かご台数と前記乗場呼
びの発生頻度の判定結果に基づいて予測空かごに対して
無駄に割当制限を行うことが少なくなる。その結果、乗
場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することができる。
Then, in another invention, the predicted car position after a predetermined time and the predicted number of cars for each floor or zone are calculated, and it is determined for each floor or zone whether the frequency of hall calls is high or low. However, it is less likely to wastefully limit the allocation to the predicted empty car based on the determination result of the predicted number of cars and the occurrence frequency of the hall call. As a result, the waiting time for a hall call can be further shortened.

[実施例] 第1図〜第10図はこの発明の一実施例を示す図である。
なお,この実施例では12階建ての建物に4台のかごが設
置されているものとする。
[Embodiment] FIGS. 1 to 10 are views showing an embodiment of the present invention.
In this embodiment, it is assumed that four cars are installed in a 12-story building.

第1図は全体構成図で,群管理装置(10)とこれによっ
て制御される1号機〜4号機用かご制御装置(11)〜
(14)から構成されている。(10A)は乗場呼び登録手
段で、各階の乗場呼び(上り呼び,および下り呼び)の
登録・解消を行うと共に乗場呼びが登録されてからの経
過時間、すなわち継続時間を演算する。(10B)は到着
予想時間演算手段で,各かごが各階の乗場(方向別)に
到着するまでに要する時間の予測値,すなわち到着予想
時間を演算する。(10C)は乗場呼びにサービスするの
に最良のかごを1台選択して割り当てる割当手段で,乗
場呼びの予測待時間と後述する割当制限手段による判定
結果とに基づいて割当演算を行う。(10D)はかご位置
予測手段で,かごが現時点から所定時間T経過後のかご
位置とかご方向とを予測演算する。(10E)はかご台数
予測手段で,前記予測かご位置と予測かご方向に基づい
て所定時間T経過後に所定階床域にいるであろうかご台
数を予測演算する。(10F)は待機手段で,かごが全て
の呼びに答え終わると答え終わった階床もしくは特定階
でかごを待機させる。(10G)は空かご検出手段で,応
答すべき呼びを持っていず戸閉状態のかごを空かごとし
て検出する。(10H)は予測空かご検出手段で,現時点
で応答すべく呼びを持っているかご(呼びに応答中のか
ごも含む)が所定時間T経過後に空かごになっていると
予想されるかごを予測空かごとして検出する。(10J)
は割当制限手段で,前記予測空かごに対して乗場呼びの
割当を制限するもしくは割当対象から除外するかどうか
を判定する。
FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram. The group management device (10) and the car control devices (11) for the first to fourth units controlled by the group management device (10).
It is composed of (14). (10A) is a hall call registration means, which registers and cancels hall calls (uplink calls and downlink calls) on each floor and calculates the elapsed time after the hall calls are registered, that is, the duration time. (10B) is an estimated arrival time calculating means, which calculates an estimated value of the time required for each car to arrive at the hall (by direction) on each floor, that is, an estimated arrival time. (10C) is an allocation means for selecting and allocating one of the best cars for servicing a hall call, and performs an allocation calculation based on a predicted waiting time of the hall call and a determination result by an allocation limiting means described later. (10D) is a car position predicting means for predicting and calculating the car position and car direction after a predetermined time T has passed from the present time. (10E) is a car number predicting means for predicting the number of cars that will be in a predetermined floor area after a predetermined time T has elapsed based on the predicted car position and the predicted car direction. (10F) is a waiting means, and when the car finishes answering all the calls, it makes the car stand by on the floor or specific floor where it has finished answering. (10G) is an empty car detection means that detects a car that has no door to answer and is in a closed state as an empty car. (10H) is a predictive empty car detection means, which is a car that has a call to answer at this moment (including the car that is answering the call) and is expected to be an empty car after a lapse of a predetermined time T. Detect as a predicted empty basket. (10J)
Is a quota limiting means for determining whether or not the quota of the hall call for the predicted empty car is restricted or excluded.

(11A)は周知の乗場呼び打消手段で,1号機用かご制御
装置(11)に設けられ,各階の乗場呼びに対する乗場呼
び打消信号を出力する。(11B)は周知のかご呼び登録
手段で,同じく各階のかご呼びを登録する。(11C)は
周知の到着予報灯制御手段で,同じく各階の到着予報灯
(図示しない)の点灯を制御する。(11D)は周知の運
行方向制御手段で,かごの運行方向を決定する。(11
E)は周知の運転制御手段で,かご呼びや割り当てられ
た乗場呼びに応答させるためにかごの走行および停止を
制御する。(11F)は周知の戸制御手段で,戸の開閉を
制御する。なお、2号機〜4号機用かご制御装置(12)
〜(14)も1号機用かご制御装置(11)と同様に構成さ
れている。
(11A) is a well-known landing call canceling means, which is provided in the car control device (11) for Unit 1 and outputs a landing call cancellation signal for a landing call on each floor. (11B) is a well-known car call registration means for similarly registering car calls on each floor. (11C) is a well-known arrival forecast light control means, which similarly controls the lighting of arrival forecast lights (not shown) on each floor. (11D) is a well-known operation direction control means that determines the operation direction of the car. (11
E) is a well-known operation control means that controls the running and stopping of the car in order to respond to the car call and the assigned hall call. (11F) is a well-known door control means that controls opening and closing of the door. In addition, the car control device for Units 2 to 4 (12)
~ (14) are also constructed in the same manner as the car control device (11) for the first car.

第2図は、群管理装置(10)の構成ブロック図で、群管
理装置(10)はマイクロコンピュータ(以下,マイコン
という)で構成され,MPU(マイクロプロセシングユニッ
ト)(101),ROM(102),RAM(103),入力回路(10
4),および出力回路(105)を有している。入力回路
(104)には,各階の乗場釦からの乗場釦信号(19),
および1号機〜4号機用かご制御装置(11)〜(14)か
らの1号機〜4号機の状態信号が入力され,出力回路
(105)から各乗場釦に内蔵された乗場釦灯への信号(2
0),および1号機〜4号機用かご制御装置(11)〜(1
4)への指令信号が出力される。
FIG. 2 is a configuration block diagram of the group management device (10). The group management device (10) is composed of a microcomputer (hereinafter, referred to as a microcomputer), and MPU (micro processing unit) (101), ROM (102). , RAM (103), input circuit (10
4) and an output circuit (105). The input circuit (104) has a hall button signal (19) from a hall button on each floor,
And the state signals of the No. 1 to No. 4 units from the car control devices (11) to (14) for No. 1 to No. 4 units are input, and the signals from the output circuit (105) to the hall button lights built in each hall button. (2
0), and car control devices (11) to (1) for Units 1 to 4
The command signal to 4) is output.

次に,この実施例の動作を第3図〜第8図を参照しなが
ら説明する。第3図は群管理装置(10)を構成するマイ
コンのROM(102)に記憶された群管理プログラムを示す
フローチャート,第4図はその空かご検出プログラム
(33)を表すフローチャート,第5図は同じくかご位置
予測プログラム(35)を表すフローチャート,第6図は
同じくかご台数予測プログラム(36)を表すフローチャ
ート,第7図は同じく割当制限演算プログラム(37)を
表すフローチャート,第8図は建物を複数の階床域(ゾ
ーン)に分割した状態を表す図である。
Next, the operation of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a group management program stored in the ROM (102) of the microcomputer constituting the group management device (10), FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the empty car detection program (33), and FIG. Similarly, a flowchart showing a car position prediction program (35), FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a car number prediction program (36), FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an allocation limit calculation program (37), and FIG. 8 is a building. It is a figure showing the state divided into a plurality of floor areas (zones).

まず,第3図の群管理動作の概要を説明する。First, the outline of the group management operation of FIG. 3 will be described.

ステップ(31)の入力プログラムは,乗場釦信号(1
9),1号機〜4号機用かご制御装置(11)〜(14)から
の状態信号(かご位置,方向,停止,走行,戸開閉状
態,かご負荷,かご呼び,乗場呼び打消信号など)を入
力するもので周知のものである。
The input program of step (31) is the hall button signal (1
9), Status signals (car position, direction, stop, running, door open / close status, car load, car call, landing call cancellation signal, etc.) from the car control devices (11) to (14) for Units 1 to 4 It is well-known to input.

ステップ(33)の空かご検出プログラムでは,第4図に
示すように応答すべき呼びを持っていず戸閉状態のかご
を空かごとして検出する。第4図において,ステップ
(46),すなわちステップ(42)〜(45)は,1号機が現
在空かごであるかどうかを検出する手順を表す。1号機
がかご呼びまたは割当乗場呼びを持っていず,無方向で
戸閉状態であれば,ステップ(42)→ステップ(44)→
ステップ(45)へと進み,ここで空かごフラグAV1
「1」にセットする。上記以外は,ステップ(43)で空
かごフラグAV1を「0」にリセットする。2号機〜4号
機に対しても同様にステップ(47)〜(49)でかごの検
出を行い,空かごフラグAV2〜AV4を設定する。
In the empty car detection program in step (33), as shown in FIG. 4, a car in the closed state that does not have a call to respond to is detected as an empty car. In FIG. 4, step (46), that is, steps (42) to (45), represents a procedure for detecting whether or not the first car is currently an empty car. If Unit 1 does not have a car call or assigned hall call and is in a non-directional, door-closed state, step (42) → step (44) →
Proceed to step (45) where the empty car flag AV 1 is set to "1". In cases other than the above, the empty car flag AV 1 is reset to “0” in step (43). Performs detection of the car in also step (47) - (49) with respect to 4 Units Unit 2 sets the empty car flag AV 2 ~AV 4.

ステップ(34)の到着予想時間演算プログラムでは,1号
機〜4号機に対して各乗場i(i=1,2,3,・・・,11
は,それぞれB2,B1,1,・・・,9階の上り乗場,i=12,13,
・・・21,22は,それぞれ10,9,・・・1,B1階の下り方向
乗場を表す)への到着予想時間Aj(i)をかごj(j=
1,2,3,4)毎に演算する。到着予想時間は,例えばかご
が1階床進むのに2秒,1停止するのに10秒を要するもの
として,かごが全乗場を順次一周運転するものとして演
算される。なお,到着予想時間の演算は周知のものであ
る。
In the estimated arrival time calculation program of step (34), each hall i (i = 1,2,3, ..., 11
Are B2, B1,1, ..., 9th floor uphill platform, i = 12,13,
・ ・ ・ 21 and 22 are the expected arrival times Aj (i) at 10, 9 ...
Calculate every 1, 2, 3, 4). The estimated arrival time is calculated, for example, assuming that it takes 2 seconds for the car to advance to the first floor and 10 seconds for one stop, and that the car sequentially travels around the entire hall once. The calculation of the estimated arrival time is well known.

ステップ(35)のかご位置予測プログラムでは,1号機〜
4号機の所定時間T経過後の予測かご位置F1(T)〜F4
(T)と予測かご方向D1(T)〜D4(T)の各かごにつ
いてそれぞれ予測演算する。これを第5図によって詳細
に説明する。
In the car position prediction program for step (35),
Predicted car position F 1 (T) to F 4 after the predetermined time T of Unit 4
(T) and the prediction car directions D 1 (T) to D 4 (T) are calculated for each car. This will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

第5図のかご位置予測プログラム(35)において,ステ
ップ(65),すなわちステップ(51)〜(64)は,1号機
の所定時間T後の予測かご位置F1(T)と予測かご方向
D1(T)を演算する手順を表す。1号機に割り当てられ
た乗場呼びがある時は,ステップ(51)→ステップ(5
3)へと進み,ここで最遠方の割当乗場呼びの前方にあ
る終端階を1号機の最終呼び階と予測し,その階でのか
ごの到着方向(最上階では下り方向,最下階では上り方
向)も考慮して最終呼び予測乗場h1として設定する。ま
た,1号機が割り当てられた乗場呼びを持たずにかご呼び
だけを持っている時は,ステップ(51)→ステップ(5
2)→ステップ(54)へと進み,ここで最遠方のかご呼
び階を1号機の最終呼び階と予測し,そのときのかごの
到着方向も考慮して最終呼び予測乗場h1として設定す
る。さらに,また,1号機が割当乗場呼びもかご呼びも持
っていない時は,ステップ(51)→ステップ(52)→ス
テップ(55)へと進み,ここで1号機のかご位置階を最
終呼び階と予測し,そのときのかご方向も考慮して最終
呼び予測乗場h1として設定する。
In the car position prediction program (35) shown in FIG. 5, step (65), that is, steps (51) to (64), includes the predicted car position F 1 (T) and the predicted car direction after the predetermined time T of the first car.
The procedure for calculating D 1 (T) is shown. If there is a hall call assigned to Unit 1, step (51) → step (5
Proceed to 3), and predict that the terminal floor in front of the farthest assigned hall call will be the final calling floor of Unit 1, and the direction of arrival of the car on that floor (downward on the top floor, on the bottom floor, (Upward direction) is also taken into consideration and set as the final call prediction hall h 1 . When Unit 1 has only the car call without the assigned hall call, step (51) → step (5
2) → Go to step (54), where the farthest car calling floor is predicted to be the final calling floor of Unit 1, and the final call prediction hall h 1 is set in consideration of the car arrival direction at that time. . Further, when the first car does not have the assigned hall call or car call, the process proceeds to step (51) → step (52) → step (55), where the car position floor of the first car is the final call floor. Then, considering the car direction at that time, the final call prediction hall h 1 is set.

このようにして最終呼び予測乗場h1を求めると,次に,
ステップ(56)で1号機が空かごかどうかを判定する。
1号機が空かごでない(AV1=「0」)時は,ステップ
(57)で1号機が空かごになるまでに要する時間の予測
値(以下,空かご予測時間という)t1を求める。空かご
予測時間t1は,最終呼び予測乗場h1への到着予想時間A1
(h1)にその乗場での停止時間の予測値TS(=10秒)を
加算して求める。なお,かご位置階を最終呼び予測乗場
h1として設定した場合は,かご状態(走行中,減速中,
戸開動作中,戸開中,戸閉動作中など)に応じて停止時
間の残り時間を予測し,これを空かご予測時間t1として
設定する。
When the final call prediction hall h 1 is obtained in this way, then
In step (56), it is determined whether or not Unit 1 is an empty car.
When the first car is not an empty car (AV 1 = “0”), the predicted value of the time required for the first car to become an empty car (hereinafter referred to as the empty car prediction time) t 1 is obtained in step (57). The predicted empty car time t 1 is the predicted arrival time A 1 at the final call prediction landing h 1 .
It is calculated by adding the predicted value T S (= 10 seconds) of the stop time at the hall to (h 1 ). In addition, the car position floor is the final call prediction platform
When set as h 1 , the car condition (running, decelerating,
The remaining time of the stop time is predicted according to the door opening operation, the door opening operation, the door closing operation, etc., and this is set as the empty car prediction time t 1 .

次に,ステップ(58)で所定時間Tを経過するまでに1
号機が空かごになるかどうかを判定する。1号機の空か
ご予測時間t1が所定時間T以下の時は,所定時間Tを経
過するまでに1号機が空かごになるということを意味し
ているので,ステップ(58)→ステップ(59)へと進
み,ここで最終呼び予測乗場h1に基づいてその乗場h1
階床を所定時間T経過後の予測かご位置F1(T)として
設定する。また,予測かご方向D1(T)を「0」に設定
する。なお,予測かご方向D1(T)は,「0」の時は無
方向,「1」の時は上り方向,「2」の時は下り方向を
表す。そして,ステップ(60)で1号機の予測空かごフ
ラグPAV1を「1」にセットする。
Next, in step (58), 1 is reached before the predetermined time T elapses.
Determine if the car will be in an empty basket. When the predicted empty car time t1 of the first car is less than or equal to the predetermined time T, it means that the first car will be in the empty car before the predetermined time T elapses. Therefore, step (58) → step (59) ), Where the floor of the hall h 1 is set as the predicted car position F 1 (T) after the elapse of the predetermined time T based on the final call predicted hall h 1 . In addition, the predicted car direction D 1 (T) is set to “0”. The predicted car direction D 1 (T) represents no direction when “0”, upward direction when “1”, and downward direction when “2”. Then, in step (60), the predicted empty car flag PAV 1 of Unit 1 is set to "1".

一方,1号機のかご予測時間t1が所定時間Tよりも大きい
時は,所定時間Tを経過してもまだ空かごになっていな
いということを意味しているので,ステップ(58)→ス
テップ(61)へと進み,ここで乗場i−1の到着予想時
間A1(i−1)と乗場iの到着予想時間A1(i)が{A1
(i−1)+TS≦T<A1(i)+TS}となるような乗場
iの階床を所定時間T経過後の予測かご位置F1(T)と
して設定し,この乗場iと同じ方向を予測かご方向D
1(T)として設定する。そして,ステップ(62)で1
号機の予測空かごフラグPAV1を「0」にリセットする。
On the other hand, when the predicted car time t 1 of the first car is longer than the predetermined time T, it means that the car has not become empty even after the predetermined time T has passed, so step (58) → step Proceed to (61), where estimated arrival time A 1 (i-1) at hall i-1 and estimated arrival time A 1 (i) at hall i are {A 1
The floor of the hall i such that (i-1) + T S ≤T <A 1 (i) + T S } is set as the predicted car position F 1 (T) after the elapse of a predetermined time T. Predict same direction Car direction D
Set as 1 (T). Then, in step (62), 1
Reset the forecast empty car flag PAV 1 of Unit No. to “0”.

また,ステップ(56)で1号機が空かご(AV1
「1」)の時は,ステップ(63)で空かご予測時間t1
0秒に設定し,ステップ(64)で最終呼び予測乗場h1
基づいてその乗場h1の階床を所定時間T経過後の予測か
ご位置F1(T)として設定する。また,予測かご方向D1
(T)を「0」に設定する。そして,ステップ(62)で
1号機の予測空かごフラグPAV1を「0」にリセットす
る。
In step (56), the first car is empty (AV 1 =
In the case of “1”), the empty car prediction time t 1 is set to 0 seconds in step (63), and the floor of the hall h 1 is set for a predetermined time based on the final call prediction hall h 1 in step (64). Set as the predicted car position F 1 (T) after T has elapsed. Also, the predicted car direction D 1
Set (T) to "0". Then, in step (62), the predicted empty car flag PAV 1 of Unit 1 is reset to "0".

このようにして,ステップ(65)で1号機に対する予測
かご位置F1(T)と予測かご方向D1(T)の演算と予測
空かごの検出をするが,2号機〜4号機に対する予測かご
位置F2(T)〜F4(T),予測かご方向D2(T)〜D
4(T),および予測空かごフラグPAV2〜PAV4もステッ
プ(65)と同じ手順からなるステップ(66)〜(68)で
それぞれ設定される。
In this way, in step (65), the predicted car position F 1 (T) and the predicted car direction D 1 (T) for the first car are calculated and the predicted empty car is detected, but the predicted cars for the second to fourth cars are calculated. Position F 2 (T) to F 4 (T), predicted car direction D 2 (T) to D
4 (T) and the predicted empty car flags PAV 2 to PAV 4 are also set in steps (66) to (68), which have the same procedure as step (65).

再び第3図において,ステップ(36)のかご台数予測プ
ログラムでは,所定時間T経過後に所定階床もしくは所
定階床域にいるかご台数,例えば第8図に示すように,1
階床または連続した複数階床からなる階床域(ゾーン)
Z1〜Z6に対して予測かご台数N1(T)〜N6(T)をそれ
ぞれ演算する。これを第6図によって詳細に説明する。
Referring again to FIG. 3, in the car number prediction program of step (36), the number of cars on a predetermined floor or a predetermined floor area after a predetermined time T has passed, for example, as shown in FIG.
Floor area (zone) consisting of floors or multiple consecutive floors
The predicted car numbers N 1 (T) to N 6 (T) are calculated for Z 1 to Z 6 , respectively. This will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

第6図のかご台数予測プログラム(36)において,ステ
ップ(71)で予測かご台数N1(T)〜N6(T)をそれぞ
れ「0」台に,号機番号jおよびゾーン番号mをそれぞ
れ「1」に初期設定する。ステップ(72)では,j号機の
予測かご位置Fj(T)と予測かご方向Dj(T)に基づい
て,所定時間T経過後にj号機がゾーンZmにいるかどう
かを判定する。j号機がゾーンZmにいると予測される
と,ステップ(73)でゾーンZmの予測かご台数Nm(T)
を1台増加させる。ステップ(74)では号機番号jを一
つ増加させ,ステップ(75)で全号機について判定し終
わったかどうかをチェックする。終了していなければス
テップ(72)に戻り,上述の処理を繰り返す。
In the car number prediction program (36) of FIG. 6, the predicted car numbers N 1 (T) to N 6 (T) are set to “0” in step (71), and the machine number j and zone number m are set to “ Initially set to 1 ”. In step (72), based on the j Unit predicted car position F j (T) and the predicted car direction D j (T), it determines whether j Unit after a predetermined time T has elapsed is in the zone Zm. If Unit j is predicted to be in Zone Zm, the number of predicted cars Nm (T) in Zone Zm is determined in step (73).
Increase by one. In step (74), the machine number j is incremented by one, and in step (75) it is checked whether the judgment has been completed for all machines. If not completed, the process returns to step (72) and the above-mentioned processing is repeated.

ゾーン番号mのゾーンZmについてステップ(72)および
ステップ(73)の処理を全号機終了すると,次に,ステ
ップ(76)で,ゾーン番号mを一つ増加させると共に号
機番号jを「1」に初期設定する。そして,同じように
ステップ(72)〜(75)の処理を号機番号j>4となる
まで繰り返す。すべてのゾーンZ1〜Z6について上述の処
理を終わるとステップ(77)でゾーン番号m>6とな
り,ゾーンZ1〜Z6についてのかご台数予測の処理を終了
する。
When the processes of steps (72) and (73) are completed for the zone Zm of the zone number m, next, at step (76), the zone number m is incremented by 1 and the number j is set to "1". Initialize. Then, similarly, the processes of steps (72) to (75) are repeated until the machine number j> 4. All zones Z 1 to Z 6 processing zone concludes the step (77) the number of the above m> 6, and the ends the processing of the car number predictions for the zone Z 1 to Z 6.

ステップ(78)〜(84)では,空かごの台数NAVと予測
空かごの台数NPAVをカウントする。ステップ(78)で台
数NAV,台数NPAVをそれぞれ「0」台に,号機番号jを
「1」に初期設定する。j号機が空かごであれば,ステ
ップ(79)→ステップ(80)と進み,ここで空かごの台
数NAVを1台増加する。また,j号機が予測空かごであれ
ば,ステップ(79)→ステップ(81)→ステップ(82)
と進み,ここで予測空かごの台数NPAVを増加する。ステ
ップ(83)では号機番号jを一つ増加させ,ステップ
(84)で全号機について判定し終わったかどうかをチェ
ックする。終了していなければステップ(79)に戻り,
上述の処理を繰り返す。
In steps (78) to (84), the number of empty cars NAV and the predicted number of empty cars NPAV are counted. In step (78), the number NAV and the number NPAV are set to "0" and the machine number j is initialized to "1". If No.j is an empty car, the process proceeds from step (79) to step (80), where the number of empty cars NAV is increased by one. If Unit j is a predicted empty car, step (79) → step (81) → step (82)
Then, increase the number of predicted empty cars NPAV. In step (83), the unit number j is incremented by one, and in step (84) it is checked whether or not all the units have been judged. If not, return to step (79),
The above process is repeated.

このようにして,ゾーン毎の予測かご台数N1(T)〜N6
(T),空かごの台数NAV,および予測空かごの台数NPAV
をカウントし,かご台数予測プログラム(36)の処理を
終了する。
In this way, the predicted number of cars N 1 (T) to N 6 for each zone
(T), number of empty cars NAV, and predicted number of empty cars NPAV
Is counted, and the processing of the car number prediction program (36) ends.

第3図の群管理プログラム(10)におけるステップ(3
7)の割当制限プログラムでは,新たに乗場呼びCが登
録されると,その乗場呼びCの階床位置,その時の上記
予測かご台数N1(T)〜N6(T),空かごの台数NAV,お
よび予測空かごの台数NPAVに基づいて,上記乗場呼びC
に対して1号機〜4号機の割当を制限するかどうかを判
定し,上記新規乗場呼びCに割り当てにくくするための
割当制限評価値P1〜P4をそれぞれ設定する。なお,割当
制限評価値P1〜P4は大きな値になるほど割当制限の程度
が上がることを意味し,この値が無限大になれば最初か
ら割当の対象から除くことと等価になる。この判定手順
を第7図によって詳細に説明する。
Steps (3) in the group management program (10) in FIG.
In the allocation restriction program of 7), when a hall call C is newly registered, the floor position of the hall call C, the predicted number of cars N 1 (T) to N 6 (T) at that time, and the number of empty cars Based on NAV and predicted number of empty cars NPAV, the above hall call C
It is determined whether or not the allocation of Nos. 1 to 4 is restricted, and allocation restriction evaluation values P 1 to P 4 for making it difficult to allocate to the new hall call C are set. It should be noted that the quota evaluation value P 1 ~P 4 means that the degree of quota as a large value go up, this value will be equivalent to except from the from the beginning of the allocation target if to infinity. This determination procedure will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

第7図の割当制限プログラムにおいて,上記新規乗場呼
びCが上方階ゾーン(Z3またはZ4)に属し,空かごが1
台もいなく(NAV<1)て,所定時間T経過後に上方階
ゾーン(Z3またはZ4)にいると予想されるかごの台数が
多く(N3(T)+N4(T)≧Na)て,予測空かごはいる
が多くはなく(1≦NAV≦Nb)て,かつ下方階ゾーン(Z
1またはZ6)で乗場呼びが発生しやすい交通状態であれ
ば,ステップ(81)→ステップ(82)→ステップ(83)
→ステップ(84)→ステップ(85)→ステップ(86)と
進み,ここで予測空かごk(k∈{1,2,3,4})の割当
制限評価値Pkを「99999」に,予測空かごでないかごn
(n∈{1,2,3,4}かつn≠k)の割当制限評価値Pnを
「0」に設定する。上記以外は,ステップ(87)で全て
のかごの割当制限評価値P1〜P4を「0」に設定する。こ
のようにして割当制限評価値P1〜P4が設定される。
In the allocation restriction program of FIG. 7, the new hall call C belongs to the upper floor zone (Z 3 or Z 4 ) and the empty car is 1
Many cars are expected to be in the upper floor zone (Z 3 or Z 4 ) after a lapse of a predetermined time T without any cars (NAV <1) (N 3 (T) + N 4 (T) ≧ Na) There are not many predicted empty baskets (1 ≦ NAV ≦ Nb), and there is a lower floor zone (Z
1 or Z 6 ) If the traffic condition is such that landing calls are likely to occur, step (81) → step (82) → step (83)
→ Go to step (84) → step (85) → step (86), where the allocation limit evaluation value Pk of the predicted empty car k (k ∈ {1,2,3,4}) is predicted to "99999". Not empty basket n
The allocation limit evaluation value Pn of (nε {1,2,3,4} and n ≠ k) is set to “0”. Other than the above, it sets the assigned limit evaluation value P 1 to P 4 of all of the cars to "0" at step (87). In this way, the allocation limit evaluation values P 1 to P 4 are set.

第3図の群管理プログラム(10)におけるステップ(3
8)の待時間評価プログラムでは,新規乗場呼びCを1
号機〜4号機にそれぞれ仮割当した時の各乗場呼びの待
時間に関する評価値W1〜W4を演算する。この待時間評価
値W1〜W4の演算については周知であるので詳細な説明は
省略するが,例えば1号機を仮割当した場合は,1号機を
仮割当した時の各乗場呼びiの予測待時間U(i)(i
=1,2,・・・,22:乗場呼びが登録されていなければ
「0」秒とする)を求め,これらの2乗値の総和,すな
わち待時間評価値W1=U(1)+U(2)+・・・
+U(22)でもって演算する。
Steps (3) in the group management program (10) in FIG.
In the waiting time evaluation program of 8), the new hall call C is 1
The evaluation values W 1 to W 4 relating to the waiting time of each hall call when temporarily allocated to Units 4 to 4 are calculated. Since the calculation of the waiting time evaluation values W 1 to W 4 is well known, detailed description thereof will be omitted. For example, when Unit 1 is provisionally allocated, prediction of each hall call i when Unit 1 is provisionally allocated is performed. Wait time U (i) (i
= 1,2, ..., 22: If the hall call is not registered, “0” seconds are calculated, and the sum of these squared values, that is, the waiting time evaluation value W 1 = U (1) 2 + U (2) 2 + ...
Calculate with + U (22) 2 .

次に,ステップ(39)の割当かご選択プログラムでは,
上記割当制限評価値P1〜P4と待時間評価値W1〜W4に基づ
いて割当かごを1台選択する。この実施例では,j号機に
新規乗場呼びCを仮割当した時の総合評価値Ejを,Ej=W
j+k・Pj(k:定数)で求め,この総合評価値Ejが最小
となるかごを正規の割当かごとして選択するものであ
る。割当かごには乗場呼びCに対応した割当指令と予報
指令を設定する。
Next, in the assigned car selection program in step (39),
One assigned car is selected based on the above-mentioned quota restriction evaluation values P 1 to P 4 and waiting time evaluation values W 1 to W 4 . In this embodiment, the total evaluation value Ej when the new hall call C is provisionally assigned to Unit j is Ej = W
It is determined by j + k · Pj (k: constant), and the car with the smallest total evaluation value Ej is selected as a normally assigned car. An assignment command and a forecast command corresponding to the hall call C are set in the assigned car.

さらに,ステップ(40)の待機動作プログラムでは,す
べて乗場呼びに答え終わった空かごが生じると,かごが
1か所に固まらないようにするため,上記空かごを最終
呼びの階でそのまま待機させるか,または特定階で待機
させるかを判定し,特定階で待機すると判定した時はそ
の特定階へ走行させるための待機指令を上記空かごに設
定する。
Further, in the standby operation program of step (40), when an empty car that has answered all the hall calls occurs, the above empty car is kept waiting on the floor of the final call so that the car does not become stuck in one place. It is determined whether or not to wait on the specific floor. When it is determined to wait on the specific floor, a standby command for traveling to the specific floor is set in the empty car.

最後に,ステップ(41)の出力プログラムでは,上記の
ようにして設定された乗場釦灯信号(20)を乗場に送出
すると共に,割当信号,予報信号,および待機指令など
を1号機〜4号機用かご制御装置(11)〜(14)に送出
する。
Finally, in the output program of step (41), the hall button light signal (20) set as described above is sent to the hall, and allocation signals, forecast signals, standby commands, etc. are sent from Units 1 to 4 It is sent to the car control devices (11) to (14).

このような手順で上記群管理プログラム(31)〜(41)
を繰り返し実行する。
The above group management programs (31) to (41)
Is repeatedly executed.

次に,この実施例における群管理プログラム(10)の動
作を第9図,および第10図によって,さらに具体的に説
明する。なお,簡単のために第12図〜第15図で用いた例
を使用して説明する。
Next, the operation of the group management program (10) in this embodiment will be described more specifically with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10. For the sake of simplicity, description will be given using the example used in FIGS. 12 to 15.

第12図に示す状態において,第9図に示すように9階の
下り呼び(9d)が登録されたものとする。なお,5階上り
呼び(5u)の継続時間は10秒とする。この時,かごAに
9階の下り呼び(9d)を仮割当した時の9階の下り呼び
(9d)および5階上り呼び(5u)の予測待時間はそれぞ
れ24秒と16秒となり,この時の待時間評価値WAは,WA=2
42+162=832となる。一方,かごBに仮割当した時の9
階の下り呼び(9d)および5階上り呼び(5u)の予測待
時間はそれぞれ28秒と16秒となり,この時の待時間評価
値WBは,WB=282+162=1040となる。したがって,従来
の割当方式であれば,WA<WBであるので9階下り呼び(9
d)はかごAに割り当てられる。
In the state shown in FIG. 12, it is assumed that the downward call (9d) on the 9th floor is registered as shown in FIG. The duration of the 5th floor ascending call (5u) is 10 seconds. At this time, when the 9th floor downcall (9d) is provisionally assigned to the car A, the predicted waiting times of the 9th floor downcall (9d) and the 5th floor upcall (5u) are 24 seconds and 16 seconds, respectively. The waiting time evaluation value W A at time is W A = 2
4 2 +16 2 = 832. On the other hand, 9 when temporarily assigned to car B
The predicted waiting times of the floor down call (9d) and the fifth floor up call (5u) are 28 seconds and 16 seconds, respectively, and the waiting time evaluation value W B at this time is W B = 28 2 +16 2 = 1040 . Therefore, in the conventional allocation method, since W A <W B , the 9th floor down call (9
d) is assigned to car A.

さて,かごAおよびかごBの所定時間T(T=20秒)経
過後のかご位置は第10図に示すようにかごA′およびか
ごB′のようになる。したがって,この時の予測かご台
数は,N3(T)=2台,N1(T)=N2(T)=N4(T)=
N5(T)=N6(T)=0台となり,空かご台数NAV=0
台,予測空かご台数NPAV=1台となる。なお,この例で
は無方向のかごは上り方向とみなしたが,かご位置に応
じて適宜方向を決めればよい。また,この例において,
一定値Na=2台,Nb=1台とすれば,N3(T)=2台は一
つのゾーンに全てのかごがいる場合に相当するので,第
7図の割当制限プログラム(37)のステップ(86)にお
いてかごAの割当制限評価値PA=99999,かごBの割当制
限評価値PB=0と設定される。したがって,総合評価値
は,EA=WA+PA=99999=100831,EB=WB+PB=1040+0
=1040,でEA>EBとなるので,最終的に9階下り呼び(9
d)はかごBに割り当てられる。
Now, the car positions of the cars A and B after a predetermined time T (T = 20 seconds) have become like the car A'and the car B'as shown in FIG. Therefore, the predicted number of cars at this time is N 3 (T) = 2, N 1 (T) = N 2 (T) = N 4 (T) =
N 5 (T) = N 6 (T) = 0 cars, and the number of empty cars NAV = 0
Number of cars, predicted number of empty cars NPAV = 1 In this example, the non-directional car is regarded as the upward direction, but the direction may be appropriately determined according to the car position. Also, in this example,
If the fixed values Na = 2 units and Nb = 1 unit, N 3 (T) = 2 units corresponds to the case where all the cars are in one zone, so the allocation restriction program (37) in Fig. 7 In step (86), the allocation limit evaluation value P A of car A is set to 99999, and the allocation restriction evaluation value P B of car B is set to 0. Therefore, the overall evaluation value is E A = W A + P A = 99999 = 100831, E B = W B + P B = 1040 + 0
= 1040, E A > E B , so the 9th floor descending call (9
d) is assigned to car B.

従来の割当方式だとかごAに割り当てられて近い将来に
かごはだんご運転となり長待ち呼びが発生しやすくな
る。しかし,所定時間T経過後のかご配置を考慮してか
ごBに割当することにより,このようなだんご運転を防
止することができる。
With the conventional allocation method, the car is allocated to car A and the car will be in a dangling operation in the near future. However, by assigning to the car B in consideration of the car arrangement after the elapse of the predetermined time T, such dumpling operation can be prevented.

以上説明したように上記実施例では,かごが現時点から
呼びに順次応答して所定時間経過後のかご位置とかご方
向とを予測演算し,さらにこれらに基づいて予測空かご
の台数と各ゾーンにおける所定時間経過後のかご台数を
予測演算し,これらの予測かご台数に応じて予測空かご
に対する割当制限動作を行わせるようにしたので,かご
が1か所に集中することがなくなり,現時点から近い将
来にわたって乗場呼びの待時間を短縮することができ
る。
As described above, in the above embodiment, the car sequentially responds to the call from the present time to predictively calculate the car position and car direction after a predetermined time has passed, and based on these, the predicted number of empty cars and the number of empty cars in each zone. The number of cars after a predetermined time has elapsed is predicted and calculated, and the allocation restriction operation for the predicted empty cars is performed according to these predicted numbers of cars, so the cars will not be concentrated in one place, and it will be close to the present time. The waiting time for landing calls can be shortened in the future.

なお,上記実施例では,所定時間T経過後のかご位置と
かご方向を予測する時,まずかごが最終呼びに答え終わ
って空かごになるであろう階床とそれまでに更に時間を
予測し,その上で所定時間T経過後のかご位置とかご方
向を予測するようにした。これは,かごが空かごになる
とその階でそのまま待機するものと仮定したからであ
る。
In the above embodiment, when predicting the car position and car direction after the lapse of a predetermined time T, first, the car floor and the floor that will be the vacant car after answering the final call are predicted. After that, the car position and car direction after the predetermined time T has elapsed are predicted. This is because it is assumed that the car will wait as it is when the car is empty.

空かごを特定階で必ず待機させることが決まっている場
合であれば,特定階に走行させるものとしてかご位置と
かご方向を予測すればよい。また,所定時間Tを経過す
るまでに新たに発生するであろう呼びも考慮してかご位
置とかご方向を予測することもできる。さらにまた,最
終呼び予測乗場の演算方向もこの実施例のように簡略化
したものではなく,統計的に求めたかご呼びや乗場呼び
の発生確率に基づいてきめ細かく予測するものであって
もよい。
If it has been decided that an empty car will always wait on a specific floor, the car position and car direction can be predicted assuming that the car will travel to the specific floor. Further, the car position and the car direction can be predicted in consideration of a call that will be newly generated before the predetermined time T elapses. Furthermore, the calculation direction of the final call prediction hall is not simplified as in this embodiment, but may be finely predicted based on the statistically obtained probability of the car call or hall call.

また,上記実施例では,第8図に示すようなゾーンに建
物を分割したが階床数や設置かご台数の他,時間帯や各
階床の用途(主階床,食堂階,集会室階,乗継階など)
に応じて逐次ゾーンの設定の仕方を変更することも容易
である。また,必ずしも乗場の方向を考慮してゾーンを
決める必要はない。
Further, in the above embodiment, the building is divided into zones as shown in FIG. 8, but in addition to the number of floors and the number of installed cages, the time zone and the purpose of each floor (main floor, dining floor, meeting room floor, (Transfer floor, etc.)
It is easy to change the setting method of the successive zones according to the above. Moreover, it is not always necessary to decide the zone in consideration of the landing direction.

さらにまた,上記実施例では, (イ) 新規乗場呼びCが上方階ゾーンに属している
時, 空かごが1台もなく, 所定時間T経過後に上方階ゾーンにいると予想され
るかごの台数が多く, 予測空かごが1台はいるが,多くはなく, 下方階ゾーンに乗場呼びが発生しやすい交通状態で
ある。
Furthermore, in the above embodiment, (a) when the new hall call C belongs to the upper floor zone, there is no empty car, and the number of cars expected to be in the upper floor zone after the elapse of the predetermined time T. There are many predicted empty cars, but there are not many and there is not so many, and it is a traffic condition where landing calls are likely to occur in the lower floor zone.

という条件〜がいずれも成立すると,所定の予測空
かごに対して新規乗場呼びCへの割当を制限するための
割当制限評価値(>0)をそれぞれ設定する。
If any of the above conditions (1) to (3) is satisfied, the allocation restriction evaluation value (> 0) for restricting the allocation to the new hall call C for the predetermined predicted empty car is set.

というようにした。しかし,割当制限評価値の設定条件
はこれに限るものではない。
I did it. However, the conditions for setting the quota evaluation value are not limited to this.

(ロ) 新規乗場呼びCが下方階ゾーンに属している
時, 空かごが1台もなく, 所定時間T経過後に下方階ゾーンにいると予想され
るかごの台数が多く, 予測空かごが1台はいるが,多くはなく, 上方階ゾーンに乗場呼びが発生しやすい交通状態で
ある。
(B) When the new hall call C belongs to the lower floor zone, there is no empty car, and the number of cars expected to be in the lower floor zone after the elapse of the predetermined time T is large, and the predicted empty car is 1 There are pedestrians, but not many, and the traffic condition is such that landing calls are likely to occur in the upper floor zone.

という条件(ロ)を適用することもできるし, (ハ) 新規乗場呼びCが中間階ゾーンに属している
時, 空かごが1台もなく, 所定時間T経過後に中間階ゾーンにいると予想され
るかごの台数が多く, 予測空かごが1台はいるが,多くはなく, 上方階ゾーンまたは下方階ゾーンに乗場呼びが発生
しやすい交通状態である。
It is also possible to apply the condition (b), and (c) when the new hall call C belongs to the middle floor zone, there is no empty car, and it is expected that it will be in the middle floor zone after a predetermined time T Although there are many cars to be closed and there is one predicted empty car, there are not many cars and the traffic conditions are such that landing calls are likely to occur in the upper floor zone or lower floor zone.

という条件(ハ)を適用することもできる。さらに,1つ
のゾーンにかごが集中するということの裏返しを使用す
る。
It is also possible to apply the condition (C). In addition, we use the inside out that the cars are concentrated in one zone.

(ニ) 新規乗場呼びCが登録された時, 空かごが1台もなく, 上方階ゾーン,下方階ゾーン,または中間階ゾーン
のいずれかのゾーンで,新規乗場呼びCが属さないゾー
ンで,かつ所定時間T経過後にいると予想されるかごが
1台もないというゾーンが存在して, 予測空かごが1台はいるが,多くはなく, 上記を満たすゾーンに乗場呼びが発生しやすい交
通状態である。
(D) When a new hall call C is registered, there is no empty car, either in the upper floor zone, the lower floor zone, or the middle floor zone, in the zone to which the new hall call C does not belong, In addition, there is a zone where there is no car expected to be after the predetermined time T has passed, and there is one predicted empty car, but there are not many and there are not many. It is in a state.

という条件(ニ)を適用することもできる。なお,この
条件(ニ)が成立した時,予測空かごのうち上記を満
たすゾーンに最も近い予測かごを割当制御することが望
ましい。
The condition (d) can be applied. When this condition (d) is satisfied, it is desirable to control the allocation of the predicted car closest to the zone satisfying the above condition among the predicted empty cars.

ここで,上記条件(イ)〜(ニ)における条件項は,
予測空かごを温存することによる効果をできるだけ高く
するために設けているものである。この条件項の交通
状態の条件がなくてもこの発明の効果を大きく損なうも
のではない。
Here, the conditional terms in the above conditions (a) to (d) are
It is provided to maximize the effect of preserving the predicted empty basket. The effect of the present invention is not significantly impaired even if there is no traffic condition in this condition.

また,上記条件(イ)〜(ニ)における条件項の空か
ごの台数に関する条件を空かご台数=0台としたが,空
かご台数≧1台の場合にもこの発明を適用することがで
きる。例えば, (ホ) 新規乗場呼びCが上方階ゾーンに属している
時, 空かごが上方階ゾーンに1台いて, 所定時間T経過後に上方階ゾーンにいると予想され
るかごの台数が多く, 予測空かごが1台はいるが,多くはない。
Further, although the condition regarding the number of empty cars in the condition items in the above conditions (a) to (d) is set to 0 empty cars, the present invention can also be applied when the number of empty cars ≧ 1. . For example, (e) When the new hall call C belongs to the upper floor zone, there is one empty car in the upper floor zone, and there are many cars that are expected to be in the upper floor zone after the elapse of the predetermined time T. There is one predicted empty basket, but not many.

という条件(ホ)が成立すると,所定の予測空かごに対
して新規乗場呼びCへの割当を制限するということも可
能である。この条件(ホ)が有効なのは,下方階ゾーン
にすぐ乗場呼びが発生するというような混雑した交通状
態にない場合である。すなわち,新規乗場呼びCには空
かごを有効に使用して短時間でサービスさせ,下方階ゾ
ーンの近い将来登録されるであろう乗場呼びには近いう
ちに空かごになるであろう予測空かごをサービスさせる
ということを意図している。
If the condition (e) is satisfied, it is possible to limit the allocation to the new hall call C to a predetermined predicted empty car. This condition (e) is effective when the traffic is not congested such that a hall call is generated immediately in the lower floor zone. That is, the empty car is effectively used for the new landing call C to be serviced in a short time, and the predicted empty space will soon become an empty car for the landing call that will be registered in the lower floor zone in the near future. It is intended to bring the car into service.

さらにまた,上記条件(イ)〜(ホ)における条件項
で,「予測空かごの台数が1台以上で,かつ一定値Nb以
下」という条件を付けたが,これは予測空かごの台数が
多いときには割当制限により予測空かごの温存は必ずし
も必要ないためである。「一定値Nb以下」という条件を
無くし,割当制限すべき予測空かごを選択する処理の中
で,特定の1台もしくは2台(例えば,空かご予測時間
t1〜t4を用いて最も早く空かごになりそうなかごを選択
したり,または予測かご位置F1(T)〜F4(T)と予測
かご方向D1(T)〜D4(T)を用いて下方階ゾーンに最
も近いかごを選択したりする)を割当制限するようにし
て同様の効果が得られる。
Furthermore, in the condition items in the above conditions (a) to (e), the condition that “the number of predicted empty cars is 1 or more and less than a certain value Nb” is added. This is because it is not always necessary to save the predicted empty car due to quota restrictions when there are many. In the process of selecting the predicted empty car that should be restricted by eliminating the condition of "below a certain value Nb", one or two specific cars (for example, empty car prediction time)
Select the car that is likely to become the empty car earliest using t 1 to t 4 , or predict car position F 1 (T) to F 4 (T) and predict car direction D 1 (T) to D 4 ( (T) is used to select the car closest to the lower zone, and the same effect can be obtained.

この他にも予測かご台数に基づく予測空かごへの割当制
限の条件は種々考えられるが,第7図に示した条件
(イ)と同様に容易に実現できることは明白である。
Other than this, various conditions for restricting the allocation to the predicted empty car based on the predicted number of cars are conceivable, but it is obvious that the condition can be easily realized like the condition (a) shown in FIG.

さらにまた,上記(イ)〜(ホ)のほかそれぞれの状況
に応じた複数の条件が設けられている時,同時に2つ以
上の条件が成立する場合も考えられる。このような場
合,どの条件に従って割当制限するかごを決めるかとい
う問題が生じる。このような問題を解決する方法には種
々考えられるが,その一つによく知られたファジイ理論
を利用するものがある。例えば,前述の「エレベーター
の群管理装置」(昭和63年電気・情報関連学会,予稿集
第2分冊P2−117〜120)で詳細に詳述されているよう
に,条件を構成している条件項のそれぞれが成立する度
合いをメンバーシップ関数で0から1の間の数値で表
し,それらを用いてAND結合であれば最小値を,OR結合で
あれば最大値を選択して,条件そのものの確信度を計算
し,最終的に最も高い確信度を持つ条件を一つ選択する
方式である。また,各条件に対応した割当制限の仕方に
確信度の大きさに応じた重み付けをそれぞれ行い,それ
に従ってかごを割当制限するという方式もある。このよ
うな方式における条件に対してもこの発明を適用するこ
とができることは明白である。このように,所定階もし
くは所定階床域に集中するであろうかごの予測台数と近
い将来空かごになるであろう予測空かごの台数とを使用
した条件であればどのようなものであってもよい。
Furthermore, in addition to the above (a) to (e), when a plurality of conditions according to each situation are provided, it is possible that two or more conditions are satisfied at the same time. In such a case, there arises a problem of which condition to decide the car to which the allocation is restricted. There are various methods for solving such a problem, and one of them is to use the well-known fuzzy theory. For example, as described in detail in the above-mentioned "Elevator group control device" (1988, Electrical and Information Related Society, Proceedings Vol. 2 pp. 2-117 to 120), the conditions that make up the conditions The membership function represents the degree to which each of the terms holds, and the minimum value is selected for AND connection and the maximum value is selected for OR connection by using them. In this method, the certainty factor is calculated and the condition with the highest certainty factor is finally selected. There is also a method of assigning weights according to the degree of certainty to the assignment restriction method corresponding to each condition, and assigning the cars accordingly. It is obvious that the present invention can be applied to the conditions in such a system. In this way, what is the condition under which the predicted number of cars that will be concentrated on a predetermined floor or a predetermined floor area and the predicted number of cars that will become empty cars in the near future are used? May be.

さらにまた,上記実施例では,乗場呼びへ割当を制限す
る手段として,特定のかごに対しては他のかごより大き
な値を持つ割当制限評価値を設定し,これを待時間評価
値に重み付け加算して総合評価値を求め,この総合評価
値が最小のかごを正規の割当かごとして選択する方式を
使用した。このように割当制限評価値を他の評価値と組
み合わせて総合評価し割り当てるということは,割当制
限評価値の小さいかごを優先的に割り当てるということ
に他ならない。すなわち,上記割当制限評価値が大きい
かごは他のかごより割り当てにくくなる。
Furthermore, in the above-described embodiment, as a means for restricting allocation to hall calls, an allocation restriction evaluation value having a larger value than other cars is set for a specific car, and this is weighted and added to the waiting time evaluation value. Then, the overall evaluation value was obtained, and the car with the minimum overall evaluation value was selected as the regular assigned car. In this way, the quota evaluation value is combined with other evaluation values to be comprehensively evaluated and assigned, which is nothing but to preferentially assign a car having a low quota evaluation value. That is, a car having a large allocation restriction evaluation value is harder to allocate than other cars.

また,乗場呼びへの割当を制限する手段は上記実施例に
限るものではなく,割当制限条件を満たすかごを予め割
当かごの候補から除外する方式であってもよい。
Further, the means for restricting the allocation to the hall calls is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiment, and a method of excluding a car satisfying the allocation restriction condition from the candidates for the allocated car in advance may be used.

さらにまた,上記実施例では,待時間評価値を乗場呼び
の予測待時間の2乗値の総和としたが,待時間評価値の
演算方法はこれに限るものではない。例えば,登録され
ている複数の乗場呼びの予測待時間の総和を待時間評価
値としたり,同じく予測待時間の最大値を待時間評価値
とする方式を使用するものであってもこの発明を適用で
きることは明白である。もちろん,割当制限評価値と組
み合わせる評価項目は待時間に限るものではなく,予測
外れや満員などを評価項目とする評価指標と組み合わせ
ても良いものである。
Furthermore, in the above embodiment, the waiting time evaluation value is the sum of squared values of the predicted waiting time of hall calls, but the method of calculating the waiting time evaluation value is not limited to this. For example, the present invention can be applied even when using a method in which the sum of the predicted waiting times of a plurality of registered hall calls is used as the waiting time evaluation value, or the maximum predicted waiting time is also used as the waiting time evaluation value. Clearly applicable. Of course, the evaluation item to be combined with the allocation limit evaluation value is not limited to the waiting time, and may be combined with an evaluation index having an evaluation item such as a failure of prediction or fullness.

また,上記実施例では,一種類の所定時間Tについて所
定時間経過後のかご位置とかご方向を各かごについてそ
れぞれ予測し,これに基づいて割当制限評価値を演算す
るようにしたが,複数種類の所定時間T1,T2,・・・,Tr
(T1<T2<・・・<Tr)について所定時間経過後のかご
位置とかご方向を各かごについてそれぞれ予測し,さら
に複数種類の所定時間T1,T2,・・・,Trについて所定時
間経過後の予測かご台数Nm(T1)〜Nm(Tr)を各ぞーン
Zm(m=1,2,・・・)についてそれぞれを演算する。ま
た,予測空かご台数NPAV(T1)〜NPAV(Tr)をそれぞれ
演算する。そして,各組み合わせ{N1(T1),N2(T
2),・・・,NPAV(T1)},{N1(T2),N2(T2),・
・・,NPAV(T2)},・・・,{N1(Tr),N2(Tr),・
・・NPAV(Tr)},によってそれぞれ設定された割当制
限評価値P(T1),P(T2),・・・,P(Tr),を重み付
け加算する。すなわち,P=k1・P(T1)+k・P(T2)
+kr・P(Tr),(但し,k1,k2,・・・,krは重み係数)
なる算式に従って演算することにより,最終的な割当制
限評価値Pを設定することも容易である。この場合,あ
る一時点Tだけのかご配置に注目するのではなく,T1,T
2,・・・,Trという複数の時点におけるかご配置を大局
的に評価することになるので,現時点から近い将来にわ
たって乗場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することが可能とな
る。なお,上記重み係数k1,k2,・・・,krは,例えば第1
1図に示すように,どの時点のかご配置を重視するかに
よって何通りかの設定方法が考えられるが,交通状態や
建物の特性などに応じて適宜選択すればよい。
Further, in the above embodiment, the car position and car direction after a lapse of a predetermined time for one kind of predetermined time T are predicted for each car, and the allocation limit evaluation value is calculated based on this prediction. Predetermined time T1, T2, ..., Tr
For (T1 <T2 <... <Tr), predict the car position and car direction for each car after a predetermined time has elapsed, and after a predetermined time has elapsed for multiple types of predetermined time T1, T2, ..., Tr Predicted number of cars Nm (T1) to Nm (Tr)
Each is calculated for Zm (m = 1, 2, ...). It also calculates the predicted number of empty cars NPAV (T1) to NPAV (Tr). Then, each combination {N 1 (T1), N 2 (T
2), ..., NPAV (T1)}, {N 1 (T2), N 2 (T2), ・
.., NPAV (T2)}, ..., {N 1 (Tr), N 2 (Tr), ...
.. NPAV (Tr)}, weighting addition is performed on the allocation limit evaluation values P (T1), P (T2), ..., P (Tr). That is, P = k1 · P (T1) + k · P (T2)
+ kr ・ P (Tr), (k1, k2, ..., kr are weighting factors)
It is also easy to set the final allocation limit evaluation value P by calculating according to the following formula. In this case, instead of paying attention to the car placement only at a certain point T, T1, T
Since the car layout at two or more points such as 2, ..., Tr will be evaluated globally, it is possible to further reduce the waiting time for a hall call from the present time to the near future. The weighting factors k1, k2, ..., Kr are, for example, the first
As shown in Fig. 1, there are several possible setting methods depending on when the car placement is emphasized, but it may be selected appropriately according to the traffic conditions and the characteristics of the building.

[発明の効果] この発明は、以上説明したとおり、乗場釦が操作される
と乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手段と、前記乗場呼
びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべきかごを選
択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの運行方向決定、出
発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御を行い、かごをか
ご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させるかご制御手段と
を備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、応答すべき
呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごに対して最終
の呼びの階に到着するまでの到着予想時間をそれぞれ演
算し、さらにこの到着予想時間に基づいて応答すべき呼
びに全て答え終わった状態になるまでの予測時間を演算
し、この予測時間が所定時間以内のかごを予測空かごと
して検出する予測空かご検出手段と、前記予測空かごが
検出されているとき、前記予測空かごを他のかごよりも
乗場呼びに割り当てにくくするか又は前記予測空かごを
割当対象から除外する割当制限動作を行う割当制御手段
とを備え、前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基
づいて割当かごを選択するようにしたので、近い将来に
かごが1カ所に集中することが少なくなり、その結果、
乗場呼びの待時間を短縮することができるという効果を
奏する。
[Effects of the Invention] As described above, according to the present invention, a hall call registration means for registering a hall call when the hall button is operated, and a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for the hall call are selected. Group management of elevators including allocation means for allocating the car and determining operation direction of the car, operation control such as departure, stop, door opening and closing, and car control means for making the car respond to the car call and the allocated hall call. The device calculates the expected arrival time until the car arrives at the final call floor for each car that has not answered all the calls that should be answered, and further determines the call that should be answered based on this expected arrival time. Predicted empty car detection means that calculates the predicted time until all the answers are completed and detects cars whose predicted time is within the predetermined time as a predicted empty car, and the predicted empty car When being issued, the allocation means for making the allocation of the predicted empty car harder to assign to a landing call than other cars, or allocation control means for performing an allocation limiting operation for excluding the predicted empty car from allocation targets, the allocation means, Since the car to be allocated is selected based on the output of the allocation limiting means, the car is less likely to be concentrated in one place in the near future, and as a result,
The effect is that the waiting time for a hall call can be shortened.

また、別の発明は、以上説明したとおり、乗場釦が操作
されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手段と、前記
乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべきか
ごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの運行方向決
定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御を行い、か
ごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させるかご制御
手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、応答
すべき呼びに全て答え終わった状態のかごを空かごとし
て検出する空かご検出手段と、前記空かご以外のかごの
うち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全て答え
終わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空かごとし
て検出する予測空かご検出手段と、第2の所定時間後の
かご位置をそれぞれ予測するかご位置予測手段と、この
かご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、前記第2の
所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそれぞ
れ予測するかご台数予測手段と、前記予測空かごが検出
されているとき、前記空かごの有無と前記かご台数予測
手段による特定階又は特定ゾーンの予測かご台数を条件
とし、前記予測空かごを他のかごよりも乗場呼びに割り
当てにくくするか又は前記予測空かごを割当対象から除
外する割当制限動作を行う割当制限手段とを備え、前記
割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基づいて割当かご
を選択するようにしたので、予測空かごに対して無駄に
割当制限を行うことが少なくなると同時に、近い将来に
かごが1カ所に集中することも少なくなり、その結果、
乗場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することができる。
Another invention is, as described above, a hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, and selecting a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for the hall call. In an elevator group management device comprising allocation means for allocating, and operation control for determining the operating direction of a car, departure, stop, door opening and closing, and the like, and a car control means for making a car respond to a car call and the allocated landing call. , The empty car detecting means for detecting the car that has answered all the calls to be answered as an empty car, and all the calls to be answered within the first predetermined time among the cars other than the empty car Predicting empty car detecting means for detecting a car expected to be in a state as a predicted empty car, car position predicting means for predicting a car position after a second predetermined time, and this car position predicting means Car number predicting means for predicting the number of cars after the elapse of the second predetermined time for each floor or zone based on the predicted calculation value, and the presence or absence of the empty car when the predicted empty car is detected And the number of cars predicted on the specific floor or zone by the car number predicting means, the allocation is made to make it more difficult to allocate the predicted empty car to a hall call than other cars or to exclude the predicted empty car from allocation targets. Since the allocation means is configured to select an allocation car based on the output of the allocation restriction means, it is possible to reduce unnecessary allocation restriction to a predicted empty car at the same time. , In the near future, it is less likely that one car will be concentrated in one place, and as a result,
The waiting time for landing calls can be further shortened.

さらに、別の発明は、以上説明したとおり、乗場釦が操
作されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手段と、前
記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべき
かごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの運行方向
決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御を行い、
かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させるかご制
御手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、応
答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごのう
ち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全て答え終
わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空かごとして
検出する予測空かご検出手段と、第2の所定時間後のか
ご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するかご位置予測手段と、こ
のかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、前記第2
の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそれ
ぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、前記予測空かごが検
出されているとき、前記かご台数予測手段による特定階
又は特定ゾーンの予測かご台数に基づいて、前記予測空
かごを他のかごよりも乗場呼びに割り当てにくくする度
合を割当制限値として設定する割当制限値設定手段と、
前記予測空かご検出手段、かご台数予測手段、及び割当
制限値設定手段を用いて、前記第2の所定時間を複数の
異なる値に設定したときの割当制限値をそれぞれ演算
し、さらにそれらの割当制限値を組み合わせて総合割当
制限値を設定する割当制限手段とを備え、前記割当手段
は前記総合割当制限値に基づいて割当かごを選択するよ
うにしたので、予測空かごに対して無駄に割当制限を行
うことが少なくなると同時に、現時点から近い将来に渡
ってかごが1カ所に集中することも少なくなり、その結
果、乗場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することができるとい
う効果を奏する。
Further, as described above, another invention is, as described above, a hall call registration means for registering a hall call when the hall button is operated, and selecting a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for the hall call. Allocating means and operation control such as car direction determination, departure, stop, door opening and closing,
In a group management device for an elevator equipped with a car call and a car control means for making a response to the assigned hall call, a response is made within a first predetermined time of the cars in a state in which all the calls to be answered have not been answered. A predictive vacant car detecting means for detecting a car expected to be in a state where all calls to be answered are predicted as a predictive vacant car, and a car position predicting means for predicting and calculating a car position after a second predetermined time. Based on the predictive calculation value of the car position predicting means, the second
Of the number of cars after the lapse of a predetermined time for each floor or zone, and when the predicted empty car is detected, the number of cars predicted for the specific floor or zone by the means for predicting the number of cars Based on the above, allocation limit value setting means for setting the degree of making it more difficult to allocate the predicted empty car to a hall call than other cars as an allocation limit value,
Using the predicted empty car detection means, the number-of-cars prediction means, and the allocation limit value setting means, the allocation limit values when the second predetermined time is set to a plurality of different values are respectively calculated, and the allocation thereof is further performed. Since the allocation means is configured to select the allocation car based on the total allocation limit value, the allocation allocation means for setting the total allocation restriction value by combining the restriction values is used. At the same time as the restriction is reduced, it is less likely that the car will be concentrated in one place from the present time to the near future, and as a result, the waiting time for the hall call can be further shortened.

そして、別の発明は、以上説明したとおり、乗場釦が操
作されると乗場呼びを登録する乗場呼び登録手段と、前
記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべき
かごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、かごの運行法高
決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運転制御を行い、
かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応答させるかご制
御手段とを備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、応
答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごのう
ち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全て答え終
わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空かごとして
検出する予測空かご検出手段と、第2の所定時間後のか
ご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するかご位置予測手段と、こ
のかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、前記第2
の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそれ
ぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、階床の特性あるいは
過去の乗場呼び発生記録に基づいて、乗場呼びが発生す
る頻度が高いか低いかを階床又はゾーン毎に判定する交
通状態判定手段と、前記予測空かごが検出されていると
き、前記かご台数予測手段による特定階又は特定ゾーン
の予測かご台数と前記交通状態判定手段による乗場呼び
の発生頻度の判定結果に基づいて、前記予測空かごに対
する乗場呼びの割当制限動作を行う割当制限手段とを備
え、前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基づいて
割当かごを選択するようにしたので、予測空かごに対し
て無駄に割当制限を行うことが少なくなり、その結果、
乗場呼びの待時間を一層短縮することができるという効
果を奏する。
And, as described above, another invention is, as described above, a hall call registration means for registering a hall call when the hall button is operated, and selecting a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars for the hall call. Assigning means to be assigned and operation control such as car driving height determination, departure, stop, door opening and closing,
In a group management device for an elevator equipped with a car call and a car control means for making a response to the assigned hall call, a response is made within a first predetermined time of the cars in a state in which all the calls to be answered have not been answered. A predictive vacant car detecting means for detecting a car expected to be in a state where all calls to be answered are predicted as a predictive vacant car, and a car position predicting means for predicting and calculating a car position after a second predetermined time. Based on the predictive calculation value of the car position predicting means, the second
Whether the frequency of hall calls is high or low based on the number of cars predicting means for each floor or zone after the lapse of a predetermined time, and the floor characteristics or past hall call occurrence records. And a traffic condition determining means for determining each floor or zone, and when the predicted empty car is detected, the predicted number of cars on the specific floor or the specific zone by the car number predicting means and the hall call by the traffic condition determining means Based on the determination result of the occurrence frequency of, the allocation limiting means for performing the allocation restriction operation of the hall call to the predicted empty car, the allocation means to select the allocation car based on the output of the allocation restriction means As a result, it is less likely to unnecessarily limit the quota for the predicted empty car, and as a result,
This has the effect of further reducing the waiting time for a hall call.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図はこの発明による一実施例によるエレベータの群
管理装置の全体構成ブロック図,第2図は第1図の群管
理装置(10)の構成ブロック図,第3図は群管理プログ
ラム(10)のフローチャート図,第4図は第3図の空か
ご検出プログラム(33)のフローチャート図,第5図は
第3図のかご位置予測プログラム(36)のフローチャー
ト図,第6図はかご台数予測プログラム(36)のフロー
チャート図,第7図は第3図の割当制限プログラム(3
7)のフローチャート図,第8図は建物のゾーン分割を
示す図,第9図および第10図は呼びとかご位置の関係を
示す図,第11図はこの発明の他の実施例を説明する図で
ある。第12図〜第16図は従来のエレベータの群管理装置
を示し,それぞれ呼びとかご位置の関係を示す図であ
る。 図において,(10A)……乗場呼び登録手段,(10C)…
…割当手段,(10D)……かご位置予測手段,(10E)…
…かご台数予測手段,(10F)……待機手段,(10G)…
…空かご検出手段,(10H)……予測空かご検出手段,
(10J)……割当制限手段,(11)〜(14)……かご制
御手段である。 なお,各図中同一符号は同一又は相当部分を示す。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the entire configuration of an elevator group management device according to an embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 2 is a configuration block diagram of the group management device (10) of FIG. 1, and FIG. 3 is a group management program (10 ), FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the empty car detection program (33) of FIG. 3, FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the car position prediction program (36) of FIG. 3, and FIG. The flow chart of the program (36), Fig. 7 shows the quota control program (3
7) Flowchart diagram, FIG. 8 is a diagram showing zone division of a building, FIGS. 9 and 10 are diagrams showing a relationship between call and car positions, and FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining another embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure. FIG. 12 to FIG. 16 show a conventional elevator group management device, and are diagrams showing the relationship between the call and the car position. In the figure, (10A) ... Hall call registration means, (10C) ...
… Assignment means, (10D) …… Car position prediction means, (10E)…
… Car forecasting method, (10F) …… Standby method, (10G)…
… Empty cage detection means, (10H) …… Predicted empty cage detection means,
(10J) …… Allocation limiting means, (11) to (14) …… Car control means. In the drawings, the same reference numerals indicate the same or corresponding parts.

Claims (10)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】乗場釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する
乗場呼び登録手段と、 前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべ
きかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、 かごの運行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運
転制御を行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応
答させるかご制御手段と を備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、 応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごに
対して最終の呼びの階に到着するまでの到着予想時間を
それぞれ演算し、さらにこの到着予想時間に基づいて応
答すべき呼びに全て答え終わった状態になるまでの予測
時間を演算し、この予測時間が所定時間以内のかごを予
測空かごとして検出する予測空かご検出手段と、 前記予測空かごが検出されているとき、前記予測空かご
を他のかごよりも乗場呼びに割り当てにくくするか又は
前記予測空かごを割当対象から除外する割当制限動作を
行う割当制限手段と を備え、 前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基づいて割当
かごを選択する ことを特徴とするエレベータの群管理装置。
1. A hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, an allocation means for selecting and allocating a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars to the hall call, and a car In an elevator group management system equipped with a car control means for determining the direction of travel, departure, stop, door opening and closing, and controlling the car to respond to the car call and the assigned landing call, all the calls that should be answered For each car that has not finished answering, calculate the expected arrival time until it arrives at the floor of the final call, and based on this expected arrival time A predictive empty car detection unit that calculates a predicted time and detects a car whose predicted time is within a predetermined time as a predicted empty car; and when the predicted empty car is detected, the predicted empty car Or a quota limiting unit that performs quota limiting operation for making the predicted empty car less likely to be assigned to a hall call than other cars, and the assigning unit assigns based on the output of the quota limiting unit. Elevator group management device characterized by selecting a car.
【請求項2】前記割当制限手段は、予測かごの台数が1
台以上でかつ所定数以下のときに、前記予測空かごに対
して乗場呼びの割当制限動作を有効とすることを特徴と
する特許請求の範囲第1項記載のエレベータの群管理装
置。
2. The number of predicted cars is 1 in the allocation limiting means.
The elevator group management device according to claim 1, wherein when the number of vehicles is equal to or more than the number of vehicles and is equal to or less than a predetermined number, the hall call allocation limiting operation is enabled for the predicted empty car.
【請求項3】乗場釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する
乗場呼び登録手段と、 前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべ
きかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、 かごの運行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運
転制御を行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応
答させるかご制御手段と を備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、 応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わった状態のかごを空かご
として検出する空かご検出手段と、 前記空かご以外のかごのうち、第1の所定時間以内に応
答すべき呼びに全て答え終わった状態になると予想され
るかごを予測空かごとして検出する予測空かご検出手段
と、 第2の所定時間後のかご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するか
ご位置予測手段と、 このかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、前記第
2の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそ
れぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、 前記予測空かごが検出されているとき、前記空かごの有
無と前記かご台数予測手段による特定階又は特定ゾーン
の予測かご台数を条件とし、前記予測空かごを他のかご
よりも乗場呼びに割り当てにくくするか又は前記予測空
かごを割当対象から除外する割当制限動作を行う割当制
限手段と を備え、 前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基づいて割当
かごを選択する ことを特徴とするエレベータの群管理装置。
3. A hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, an assigning means for selecting and allocating a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars to the hall call, and a car In an elevator group management system equipped with a car control means for determining the direction of travel, departure, stop, door opening and closing, and controlling the car to respond to the car call and the assigned landing call, all the calls that should be answered An empty car detecting means for detecting the car that has finished answering as an empty car, and a car that is expected to be in a state where all calls to be answered among the cars other than the empty car have been answered within the first predetermined time Based on the prediction calculation value of the car position prediction means for predicting and calculating the car position after the second predetermined time, and the prediction calculation value of the car position prediction means. And a car number predicting means for predicting the number of cars after the second predetermined time for each floor or zone, and the presence or absence of the empty car and the car number prediction when the predicted empty car is detected. Allocation restriction that makes it more difficult to allocate the predicted empty car to a hall call than other cars or excludes the predicted empty car from allocation targets on the condition of the predicted number of cars on a specific floor or zone by means Means for selecting an assigned car based on the output of the allocation limiting means.
【請求項4】前記割当制限手段は、前記空かごが検出さ
れておらずかつ前記かご台数予測手段による特定ゾーン
の予測かご台数が所定数以上のときは、前記予測空かご
に対して前記特定ゾーンの乗場呼びの割当制限動作を有
効とし、前記空かごが検出されているとき又は前記特定
ゾーンの予測かご台数が所定数未満ときには、前記予測
空かごに対して前記特定ゾーンの乗場呼びの割当制限動
作を無効とすることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第3項
記載のエレベータの群管理装置。
4. The allocation limiting means, when the empty car is not detected and the number of cars predicted in the specific zone by the number-of-cars predicting means is equal to or more than a predetermined number, the specification is performed on the predicted empty car. When the vacant car call allocation limiting operation is enabled and the vacant car is detected or the predicted number of cars in the specific zone is less than a predetermined number, the queuing call of the specific zone is allocated to the predicted empty car. The elevator group management device according to claim 3, wherein the limiting operation is invalidated.
【請求項5】前記割当制限手段は、前記空かごが検出さ
れておらずかつ前記かご台数予測手段による特定ゾーン
の予測かご台数が所定数未満のときは、前記予測空かご
に対して前記特定ゾーン以外の乗場呼びの割当制限動作
を有効とし、前記空かごが検出されているとき又は前記
特定ゾーンの予測かご台数が所定数以上ときには、前記
予測空かごに対して前記特定ゾーン以外の乗場呼びの割
当制限動作を無効とすることを特徴とする特許請求の範
囲第3項記載のエレベータの群管理装置。
5. The allocation limiting means, when the empty car is not detected and the number of cars predicted in the specific zone by the number-of-cars predicting means is less than a predetermined number, the specification is performed on the predicted empty car. When the allocation restriction operation of hall calls other than zones is enabled and the empty car is detected or the number of predicted cars in the specific zone is equal to or more than a predetermined number, the hall calls other than the specific zone for the predicted empty car The group management device for an elevator according to claim 3, wherein the assignment restriction operation is invalidated.
【請求項6】乗場釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する
乗場呼び登録手段と、 前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべ
きかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、 かごの運行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運
転制御を行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応
答させるかご制御手段と を備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、 応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごの
うち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全て答え
終わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空かごとし
て検出する予測空かご検出手段と、 第2の所定時間後のかご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するか
ご位置予測手段と、 このかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、前記第
2の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそ
れぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、 前記予測空かごが検出されているとき、前記かご台数予
測手段による特定階又は特定ゾーンの予測かご台数に基
づいて、前記予測空かごを他のかごよりも乗場呼びに割
り当てにくくする度合を割当制限値として設定する割当
制限値設定手段と、 前記予測空かご検出手段、かご台数予測手段、及び割当
制限値設定手段を用いて、前記第2の所定時間を複数の
異なる値に設定したときの割当制限値をそれぞれ演算
し、さらにそれらの割当制限値を組み合わせて総合割当
制限値を設定する割当制限手段と を備え、 前記割当手段は前記総合割当制限値に基づいて割当かご
を選択する ことを特徴とするエレベータの群管理装置。
6. A hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, an allocating means for selecting and allocating a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars to the hall call, and In an elevator group management system equipped with a car control means for determining the direction of travel, departure, stop, door opening and closing, and controlling the car to respond to the car call and the assigned landing call, all the calls that should be answered A predictive vacant car detection means for detecting, as a predicted vacant car, a car that is expected to be in a state in which all the calls to be answered within the first predetermined time have been answered among the cars in the unfinished answer state; Based on the car position predicting means for predicting and calculating the car position after a predetermined time, and the number of cars after the second predetermined time has passed, based on the predictive calculation value of the car position predicting means, For each predicting car number predicting means, when the predicted empty car is detected, based on the predicted car number of the specific floor or the specific zone by the car number predicting means, the predicted empty car from other cars Also using the allocation limit value setting means for setting the degree of difficulty of allocation to the hall call as the allocation limit value, the predicted empty car detection means, the car number prediction means, and the allocation limit value setting means, the second predetermined time. And an allocation limiting unit that calculates the allocation limiting values when the values are set to a plurality of different values, and further combines the allocation limiting values to set a total allocation limiting value, wherein the allocating unit is the total allocation limiting value. An elevator group management device characterized by selecting an assigned car based on the following.
【請求項7】乗場釦が操作されると乗場呼びを登録する
乗場呼び登録手段と、 前記乗場呼びに対して複数のかごの中からサービスすべ
きかごを選択して割り当てる割当手段と、 かごの運行方向決定、出発、停止、および戸開閉等の運
転制御を行い、かごをかご呼びと前記割当乗場呼びに応
答させるかご制御手段と を備えたエレベータの群管理装置において、 応答すべき呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごの
うち、第1の所定時間以内に応答すべき呼びに全て答え
終わった状態になると予想されるかごを予測空かごとし
て検出する予測空かご検出手段と、 第2の所定時間後のかご位置をそれぞれ予測演算するか
ご位置予測手段と、 このかご位置予測手段の予測演算値に基づいて、前記第
2の所定時間経過後のかご台数を階床又はゾーン毎にそ
れぞれ予測するかご台数予測手段と、 階床の特性あるいは過去の乗場呼び発生記録に基づい
て、乗場呼びが発生する頻度が高いか低いかを階床又は
ゾーン毎に判定する交通状態判定手段と、 前記予測空かごが検出されているとき、前記かご台数予
測手段による特定階又は特定ゾーンの予測かご台数と前
記交通状態判定手段による乗場呼びの発生頻度の判定結
果に基づいて、前記予測空かごに対する乗場呼びの割当
制限動作を行う割当制限手段と を備え、 前記割当手段は前記割当制限手段の出力に基づいて割当
かごを選択する ことを特徴とするエレベータの群管理装置。
7. A hall call registration means for registering a hall call when a hall button is operated, an allocating means for selecting and allocating a car to be serviced from a plurality of cars to the hall call, and In an elevator group management system equipped with a car control means for determining the direction of travel, departure, stop, door opening and closing, and controlling the car to respond to the car call and the assigned landing call, all the calls that should be answered A predictive vacant car detection means for detecting, as a predicted vacant car, a car that is expected to be in a state in which all the calls to be answered within the first predetermined time have been answered among the cars in the unfinished answer state; Based on the car position predicting means for predicting and calculating the car position after a predetermined time, and the number of cars after the second predetermined time has passed, based on the predictive calculation value of the car position predicting means, For each floor or zone, a method for predicting the number of cars and a method for determining whether the frequency of hall calls is high or low based on floor characteristics or past hall call occurrence records When the predicted empty car is detected, based on the predicted car number of the specific floor or the specific zone by the car number predicting means and the judgment result of the landing call occurrence frequency by the traffic state judging means, the predicted empty car An elevator group management device, comprising: an allocation restricting unit configured to perform an allocation restricting operation of a hall call to a car, wherein the allocation unit selects an allocated car based on an output of the allocation restricting unit.
【請求項8】前記割当制限手段は、前記かご台数予測手
段による特定ゾーンの予測かご台数が所定数以上でかつ
前記交通状態判定手段により前記特定ゾーン以外での乗
場呼び発生頻度が高いと判定されているときは、前記予
測空かごに対して前記特定ゾーンの乗場呼びの割当制限
動作を有効とし、前記特定ゾーンの予測かご台数が所定
数未満のとき又は前記特定ゾーン以外での乗場呼び発生
頻度が低いと判定されているときには、前記予測空かご
に対して前記特定ゾーンの乗場呼びの割当制限動作を無
効とすることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第7項記載の
エレベータの群管理装置。
8. The allocation limiting means determines that the number of cars predicted in the specific zone by the number-of-cars predicting means is a predetermined number or more, and the traffic state determining means determines that a landing call is frequently generated in areas other than the specific zone. When the number of predicted cars in the specific zone is less than a predetermined number, or the frequency of hall calls occurring in a region other than the specific zone is valid. 8. The elevator group management device according to claim 7, wherein when it is determined that the elevator car is low, the operation of restricting the allocation of the hall calls in the specific zone is invalidated for the predicted empty car.
【請求項9】前記割当制限手段は、前記かご台数予測手
段による特定ゾーンの予測かご台数が所定数未満でかつ
前記交通状態判定手段により前記特定ゾーンでの乗場呼
び発生頻度が高いと判定されているときは、前記予測空
かごに対して前記特定ゾーン以外の乗場呼びの割当制限
動作を有効とし、前記特定ゾーンの予測かご台数が所定
数以上のとき又は前記特定ゾーンでの乗場呼び発生頻度
が低いと判定されているときには、前記予測空かごに対
して前記特定ゾーン以外の乗場呼びの割当制限動作を無
効とすることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第7項記載の
エレベータの群管理装置。
9. The allocation limiting means determines that the number of cars predicted in the specific zone by the number-of-cars predicting means is less than a predetermined number, and the traffic state determining means determines that a landing call is frequently generated in the specific zone. When the predicted number of cars in the specific zone is equal to or greater than a predetermined number, or the frequency of hall calls in the specific zone is 8. The elevator group management device according to claim 7, wherein when it is determined to be low, the operation of restricting the allocation of hall calls other than the specific zone is invalidated for the predicted empty car.
【請求項10】前記予測空かご検出手段は、応答すべき
呼びに全て答え終わっていない状態のかごに対して最終
の呼びの階に到着するまでの到着予想時間をそれぞれ演
算し、さらにこの到着予想時間に基づいて応答すべき呼
びに全て答え終わった状態になるまでの予測時間を演算
し、この予測時間が所定時間以内のかごを予測空かごと
して検出することを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第3項、
第6項又は第7項記載のエレベータの群管理装置。
10. The predictive empty car detection means calculates the expected arrival time until the car arrives at the final call floor for all the cars that have not answered all the calls to be answered, and further arrives at this arrival. Claims characterized in that a predicted time until all the calls to be answered have been answered is calculated based on the predicted time, and a car whose predicted time is within a predetermined time is detected as a predicted empty car. Section 3,
The elevator group management device according to claim 6 or 7.
JP1160714A 1989-06-26 1989-06-26 Elevator group management device Expired - Lifetime JPH0798619B2 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1160714A JPH0798619B2 (en) 1989-06-26 1989-06-26 Elevator group management device
US07/538,359 US5083640A (en) 1989-06-26 1990-06-13 Method and apparatus for effecting group management of elevators
CN90103320A CN1019288B (en) 1989-06-26 1990-06-26 Method and apparatus for realizing elevator group control
KR1019900009487A KR930004754B1 (en) 1989-06-26 1990-06-26 Method and apparatus for effecting group management of elevators
GB9014214A GB2235312B (en) 1989-06-26 1990-06-26 Method and apparatus for effecting group management of elevators
SG76794A SG76794G (en) 1989-06-26 1994-06-09 Method and apparatus for effecting group management of elevators
HK66794A HK66794A (en) 1989-06-26 1994-07-14 Method and apparatus for effecting group management of elevators

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1160714A JPH0798619B2 (en) 1989-06-26 1989-06-26 Elevator group management device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0326672A JPH0326672A (en) 1991-02-05
JPH0798619B2 true JPH0798619B2 (en) 1995-10-25

Family

ID=15720884

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1160714A Expired - Lifetime JPH0798619B2 (en) 1989-06-26 1989-06-26 Elevator group management device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0798619B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4836288B2 (en) * 2009-03-09 2011-12-14 東芝エレベータ株式会社 Elevator group management system
US8630770B2 (en) 2009-04-17 2014-01-14 Yanmar, Co., Ltd. Vehicle and feedback control method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52140148A (en) * 1976-05-17 1977-11-22 Fujitec Co Ltd Elevator controlling method
JPS59153772A (en) * 1983-02-04 1984-09-01 株式会社東芝 Group control method of elevator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0326672A (en) 1991-02-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH0772059B2 (en) Elevator group management device
US5024295A (en) Relative system response elevator dispatcher system using artificial intelligence to vary bonuses and penalties
JPH0712891B2 (en) Elevator group management device
JP3062907B2 (en) Elevator device that changes elevator group periodically
JP4505901B2 (en) Elevator control device
JP4098366B2 (en) Control of elevator group
EP1021368B1 (en) Procedure for controlling an elevator group where virtual passenger traffic is generated
JPH0351273A (en) Elevator control device
KR930004754B1 (en) Method and apparatus for effecting group management of elevators
US5239141A (en) Group management control method and apparatus for an elevator system
KR920010415B1 (en) Group-supervising an elevator system
JPH04213574A (en) Elevator distribution system
JP7027516B1 (en) Group management control device for double deck elevators and group management control method for double deck elevators
JPH0798619B2 (en) Elevator group management device
GB2264571A (en) Group controlled elevator system
JPH08198529A (en) Control device for double-deck elevator
JPH0764489B2 (en) Elevator group management device
JPH08217342A (en) Group supervisory operation control device for elevator
JPH05286652A (en) Elevator operation controlling device
JP7359340B1 (en) Elevator system and elevator car assignment method
US20240083710A1 (en) Robot interlocking elevator control system
JPH064475B2 (en) Elevator group management device
Cortés et al. A State of the Art on the most relevant patents in vertical transportation in buildings
KR20240035011A (en) Operation mode conversion system of robot-linked elevator
KR20240035012A (en) Elevator operating system for humans and robots