JPH0777460A - Detecting method for outer wall peel section with thermal image - Google Patents
Detecting method for outer wall peel section with thermal imageInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0777460A JPH0777460A JP24645893A JP24645893A JPH0777460A JP H0777460 A JPH0777460 A JP H0777460A JP 24645893 A JP24645893 A JP 24645893A JP 24645893 A JP24645893 A JP 24645893A JP H0777460 A JPH0777460 A JP H0777460A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- temperature
- thermal image
- wall
- temperature difference
- difference
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Working Measures On Existing Buildindgs (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Radiation Pyrometers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、外壁の剥離部分を簡便
にかつ信頼性良く判定できる外壁剥離部分の検出方法に
関する。建物の外壁には、構造材の表面にモルタルやタ
イルなどの外装材が設けられており、この外装材は風雨
や日照に晒され、温度や気候の変化を直接受けるために
部分的な歪みを生じて剥離し、さらには脱落する場合が
暫々ある。外装材の剥離は建物の耐久性を損なうだけで
なく、脱落事故を引起こす原因となるので、その早期検
出が必要とされる。本発明は外壁の熱画像を利用して従
来の方法よりも簡便でかつ信頼性の高い外壁剥離部分の
検出方法を提供するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for detecting a peeled portion of an outer wall, which can determine the peeled portion of an outer wall easily and reliably. On the outer wall of the building, exterior materials such as mortar and tiles are provided on the surface of the structural material.The exterior materials are exposed to wind and rain and sunlight, and are partially distorted due to direct changes in temperature and climate. There is a case where it occurs, peels off, and falls off for a while. The exfoliation of the exterior material not only impairs the durability of the building but also causes a fall accident, so early detection is required. The present invention provides a method for detecting an exfoliated portion of an outer wall, which is simpler and more reliable than conventional methods, by using a thermal image of the outer wall.
【0002】[0002]
【従来技術とその課題】外壁の剥離部分を判定する方法
としては、従来、打音法が一般的であったが、作業能率
が低く、作業用の足場を測定範囲全体に仮設する必要が
あるなどの問題があり、近年、赤外線カメラを用いた熱
画像の診断方法が考案され、利用されつつある。従来、
実施されている熱画像による判定方法は、外壁の剥離部
分は内部に空気層が介在するために密着部分(健全部
分)よりも熱伝達抵抗が高く、そのため周囲の密着部分
と温度が異なることを利用したものであり、日照量が概
ね最大となる時間帯に赤外線カメラによって外壁の熱画
像を撮影し、熱画像上に現れる温度変化の部分を経験的
に診断し、剥離箇所を判定している。2. Description of the Related Art A hitting method has heretofore been generally used as a method for determining a separated portion of an outer wall, but the work efficiency is low, and it is necessary to temporarily install a scaffold for work over the entire measurement range. In recent years, a method of diagnosing a thermal image using an infrared camera has been devised and is being used. Conventionally,
The thermal image determination method used is that the peeled part of the outer wall has a higher heat transfer resistance than the close contact part (healthy part) due to the presence of an air layer inside, and therefore the temperature is different from the temperature of the close contact part. The thermal image of the outer wall is taken by the infrared camera during the time when the amount of sunlight is almost maximum, and the part of the temperature change appearing on the thermal image is empirically diagnosed to determine the peeling point. .
【0003】ところが、実際の外壁の熱画像は、剥離が
原因で現れる温度差のほかに、建物内部の暖房による室
間の温度差、外壁とスラブの接合箇所や間仕切り壁など
の建物構造の冷橋部分に起因する温度差、壁面の汚れ、
および近隣の建物の輻射など剥離判定のノイズとなる要
因が多く、これらを経験的に区別して判定しており、こ
のため判定に熟練を要し、しかも個人的な判定誤差が大
きく信頼性が低い問題がある。また従来の方法は、外壁
の熱画像をそのまま知覚的に判断する言わば1次画像に
よる判断方法であるため、密着部分と剥離部分との温度
差が明瞭となるように日照時間が長く、しかも日中の日
照量が概ね最大となる時間帯の熱画像を利用している。
このため日照時間が極端に短い部分や、日の当たらない
北面部分については判断できない問題があった。特に寒
冷地では建物の断熱構造や暖房熱などの熱画像への影
響、低温下での検出能力など問題が大きい。However, the actual thermal image of the outer wall shows, in addition to the temperature difference caused by the peeling, the temperature difference between the rooms due to the heating inside the building, and the cooling of the building structure such as the joint between the outer wall and the slab and the partition wall. Temperature difference due to bridge, dirt on wall surface,
There are many factors that cause noise in peeling judgment such as radiation of neighboring buildings, and judgment is made empirically by distinguishing them, so skill is required for judgment, and personal judgment error is large and reliability is low. There's a problem. Further, since the conventional method is a so-called primary image judgment method in which the thermal image of the outer wall is perceptually judged as it is, the sunshine duration is long so that the temperature difference between the contact portion and the peeled portion is clear, and the sun is still used. The thermal image of the time zone when the amount of sunshine in the inside is almost maximum is used.
For this reason, there was a problem that it was not possible to determine the extremely short sunshine hours and the north side where the sun did not shine. Especially in cold regions, there are major problems such as the heat insulation structure of buildings and the influence of heating heat on thermal images, and the detection capability at low temperatures.
【0004】[0004]
【発明の解決課題】本発明は、熱画像を利用した従来方
法の上記問題を解決した剥離検出方法を提供することを
目的とする。従来の判定方法が外壁の1次熱画像をその
まま利用して直接に剥離部分と密着部分を比較する方法
であるのに対し、本発明は外壁の1次熱画像を直接に判
断対象とするのではなく、剥離部分と密着部分を含む外
壁について日中の高温時と日照後の少なくとも2時刻の
温度、または外気温の高い日中と夕方や夜間の低温時の
少なくとも2時刻の温度を熱画像によって測定してその
温度差を求め、この温度について差分処理した2次熱画
像によって剥離部分を検出する方法であり、この差分処
理により従来の問題を解消した信頼性の高い剥離部分検
出方法を達成したものである。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide a peeling detection method which solves the above problems of the conventional method using a thermal image. Whereas the conventional determination method is a method of directly comparing the peeled portion and the close contact portion by directly using the primary thermal image of the outer wall, the present invention directly determines the primary thermal image of the outer wall. Instead, the thermal image of the outer wall including the peeled part and the adhered part is taken at high temperature during the day and at least 2 times after the sunshine, or at high temperature during the day and at least 2 times during the low temperature in the evening or night. This is a method of detecting the temperature difference by measuring with this, and detecting the peeled portion by the secondary thermal image that has been subjected to the difference processing for this temperature. By this difference processing, a reliable peeled portion detection method that solved the conventional problem was achieved. It was done.
【0005】[0005]
【発明の構成】本発明によれば、以下の外壁剥離部分の
検出方法が提供される。 (1) 外壁の熱画像に示される外壁の密着部と剥離部
との温度差によって剥離部を判定する方法において、外
壁について高温時と低温時の少なくとも2時刻の温度差
を熱画像によって求め、該温度差が小さく現れる密着部
に対して該温度差が大きく現れる剥離部を該温度差によ
って検出することを特徴とする熱画像による外壁剥離部
の検出方法。 (2) 外壁について、日照量の多い日中の高温時と日
照後の低温時の少なくとも2時刻の温度を求め、この日
照量の差に基づく温度差によって剥離部を検出する上記
(1) の方法。 (3) 外壁について、日中の外気温の高い時間帯と夕
方ないし夜間の外気温の低い時間帯の少なくとも2時刻
の温度を求め、この1日の気温差に基づく温度差によっ
て剥離部を検出する上記(1) の方法。According to the present invention, the following method for detecting a peeled portion of the outer wall is provided. (1) In a method of determining a peeling portion based on a temperature difference between a close contact portion and a peeling portion of the outer wall shown in a thermal image of the outer wall, a temperature difference between at least two times of high temperature and low temperature of the outer wall is obtained from the thermal image, A method for detecting an outer wall peeling portion by a thermal image, wherein a peeling portion where the temperature difference is large is detected with respect to the close contact portion where the temperature difference is small, by the temperature difference. (2) Regarding the outer wall, the temperature at least two times at a high temperature during the daytime and a low temperature after the daylight with a large amount of sunlight is obtained, and the peeling portion is detected by the temperature difference based on the difference in the amount of sunlight.
Method (1). (3) Obtain the temperature of the outer wall at least two times during the daytime when the outside air temperature is high and at the time when the outside temperature is low in the evening or at night, and detect the peeling part by the temperature difference based on the temperature difference during the day. The method of (1) above.
【0006】外壁の剥離部は外装と建物壁面との間に空
気層が存在するため、これが断熱層となり周囲の密着部
(健全部)よりも伝熱抵抗が大きくなる。そのため、日
照時や外気温が上昇過程にあるときは剥離部分の建物壁
面への伝熱量が周囲より少なく、剥離部分の表面温度が
周囲の密着部分よりも高くなる。一方、日照後または外
気温が下降過程にあるときは壁面からの熱の供給が少な
いので周囲よりも剥離部分の表面温度が低くなる。本発
明は、このような日照量の相違および外気温の変化に起
因する剥離部分と密着部分における温度変化の相違に注
目し、外壁について日照量の多い高温時と日照後の低温
時の少なくとも2時刻の温度差、または日中の外気温の
高い時間帯と夕方から夜間の外気温の低い時間帯の少な
くとも2時刻の温度差を熱画像によって求め、該温度差
が小さく現れる密着部に対して該温度差が大きく現れる
剥離部を該温度差によって検出する。本発明において、
日中の高温時とは、日中の建物の壁面温度が高い時間帯
を言い、日照による建物温度が最高になる時間帯を含む
数時間を意味する。なお、実施例に示すように、通常、
建物の東面では日照量のピーク時から概ね2時間後に剥
離部と健全部の温度差が最大となり、南面と西面では概
ね日射量のピーク時に温度差が最大になるので日中高温
時の測定はこの時間帯が最適測定時間帯と言える。また
本発明において低温時とは、建物の壁面温度が上記高温
時の温度よりも十分に低い時間帯を言い、日射終了後か
ら夕方および夜間に至る時間帯が含まれる。Since an air layer exists between the exterior and the building wall surface in the separated portion of the outer wall, this serves as a heat insulating layer, and the heat transfer resistance becomes larger than that of the surrounding close contact portion (healthy portion). Therefore, the amount of heat transferred to the building wall surface at the peeling portion is smaller than that in the surroundings during sunshine or when the outside air temperature is in the process of rising, and the surface temperature of the peeling portion becomes higher than that in the surrounding closely contacting portion. On the other hand, after sunlight or when the outside air temperature is in the process of falling, the surface temperature of the peeled portion becomes lower than that of the surroundings because the heat supply from the wall surface is small. The present invention pays attention to such a difference in the amount of sunlight and a difference in temperature change between the peeling portion and the contact portion due to the change in the outside air temperature, and at least 2 when the outer wall has a high sunlight amount and a low temperature after the sunlight. The temperature difference of time or the temperature difference of at least two times between the time zone where the outside air temperature is high during the day and the time zone where the outside air temperature is low during the evening to the night is obtained by a thermal image, and the temperature difference is small for the contact portion. The peeled portion where the temperature difference largely appears is detected by the temperature difference. In the present invention,
The high temperature during the day means a time period when the wall temperature of the building is high during the day, and means several hours including a time period when the temperature of the building is highest due to the sunshine. As shown in the examples,
On the east side of the building, the temperature difference between the exfoliated part and the sound part becomes maximum about 2 hours after the peak of sunshine, and on the south side and the west side, the temperature difference becomes maximum at the peak of insolation. It can be said that this time zone is the optimum measurement time zone for measurement. Further, in the present invention, the low temperature refers to a time zone in which the wall surface temperature of the building is sufficiently lower than the temperature at the high temperature, and includes a time zone from the end of solar radiation to the evening and night.
【0007】具体的には、一例として、剥離部分を含む
外壁の各部分について、赤外線カメラを用い、日照量の
多い高温時(温度T1 )と日照後の低温時(温度T2 )
の少なくとも2時刻の熱画像を求め、または日中の外気
温の高い時間帯(温度T1 )と夕方から夜間の外気温の
低い時間帯(温度T2 )の少なくとも2時刻の熱画像を
求める。赤外線カメラによって撮影した熱映像を画像処
理装置によって処理し、CRTなどに表示した熱画像は
その画面の各点が測定温度に対応した濃度ないし色調で
表示されている。ここで、剥離部分を含む上記外壁の測
定範囲全体について、画面上の各点において高温時の温
度T1 から低温時の温度T2 を差引いた温度差(ΔT=
T1 −T2 )を求め、各点をこの温度差ΔTによって表
示する。この温度差ΔTは、密着部分の温度差よりも剥
離部分の温度差が大きいので、この温度差ΔTによって
表した2次熱画像には、温度差の小さい密着部分(健全
部)をバックグランドとして温度差の大きい剥離部分が
明瞭に表示される。また、このように少なくとも2時刻
の1次熱画像を差分処理して得た2次熱画像には、1次
熱画像に含まれていた種々のノイズが消去されている。
例えば、建物内部の暖房による室間の温度差、外壁とス
ラブの接合箇所や間仕切り壁などの建物の構造材に起因
する温度差、壁面の汚れなどによる影響は測定時間によ
る変動が少ないので1次熱画像では大きな温度差として
表示されていても、2時刻間の温度差によって表した2
次熱画像では温度差の小さい領域となり、影響が除去さ
れる。従って、剥離部分を明瞭にかつ正確に把握するこ
とができる。Specifically, as an example, for each part of the outer wall including the peeled part, an infrared camera is used, and when the amount of sunlight is high (temperature T1) and after the sunshine is low (temperature T2).
Of the at least two time points, or at least two time points of the daytime outside temperature range (temperature T1) and the evening to nighttime outside temperature time period (temperature T2). A thermal image taken by an infrared camera is processed by an image processing device, and a thermal image displayed on a CRT or the like has each point on the screen displayed with a density or color tone corresponding to the measured temperature. Here, for the entire measurement range of the outer wall including the peeled portion, a temperature difference (ΔT =) obtained by subtracting the temperature T2 at low temperature from the temperature T1 at high temperature at each point on the screen.
T1 -T2) is obtained and each point is represented by this temperature difference ΔT. This temperature difference ΔT has a larger temperature difference in the peeling portion than in the contacting portion. Therefore, in the secondary thermal image represented by this temperature difference ΔT, the contacting portion (healthy portion) having a small temperature difference is used as the background. The peeled portion with a large temperature difference is clearly displayed. In addition, various noises included in the primary thermal image are deleted from the secondary thermal image obtained by performing the differential processing on the primary thermal image at least at two times in this way.
For example, the temperature difference between the rooms due to heating inside the building, the temperature difference due to the structural material of the building such as the joint between the outer wall and the slab, the partition wall, etc. Even if it is displayed as a large temperature difference in the thermal image,
In the next thermal image, the area has a small temperature difference, and the influence is removed. Therefore, the peeled portion can be clearly and accurately grasped.
【0008】本発明の方法は、外壁について高温時と低
温時の少なくとも2時刻の温度を測定し、その温度差を
求めれば良い。従って、日照量の多い日中の高温時と日
照後の低温時の少なくとも2時刻の温度を測定し、この
日照量の差に基づく温度差を求めても良く、また、日射
時間の短い建物の裏側部分や、または北面など殆ど日が
照らない部分については、日中の外気温の高い時間帯と
夕方ないし夜間の外気温の低い時間帯の少なくとも2時
刻の温度を求め、この1日の気温差に基づく温度差を求
めても良い。実験によれば、日照量の相違に基づく温度
差を利用する場合には、密着部分と剥離部分の温度差が
約1℃〜0.5℃であれば信頼性の高い判定が可能であ
り、また1日の気温差を利用する場合には、気温差が約
10℃以上であれば良い。In the method of the present invention, the temperature of the outer wall at high temperature and at low temperature at least two times may be measured and the temperature difference may be obtained. Therefore, it is possible to measure the temperature at least two times at high temperature in the daytime with high sunshine and at low temperature after sunshine, and obtain the temperature difference based on this difference in the sunshine amount. For the back side part or the part where the sun does not illuminate such as the north side, find the temperature at least two times during the daytime when the outside air temperature is high and during the evening or nighttime when the outside temperature is low. The temperature difference may be calculated based on the difference. According to the experiment, when the temperature difference based on the difference in the amount of sunlight is used, highly reliable determination is possible if the temperature difference between the contact portion and the peeling portion is about 1 ° C to 0.5 ° C. Further, when using the temperature difference of one day, the temperature difference may be about 10 ° C. or more.
【0009】[0009]
【発明の効果】以上述べた、温度差で表示した2次熱画
像による本発明の方法は以下の効果を有する。 (1)従来の判定方法では区別の難しい種々の誤差要
因、例えば、建物内部の暖房による影響、冷橋などの建
物構造による影響、および壁面の汚れによる影響が排除
されるので、従来方法に比べて剥離部分の検出精度が格
段に優れ、判定作業に熟練を要せず、個人的な誤差が生
じないので信頼性の高い診断を行うことができる。 (2)寒冷地においても、建物内部の暖房熱の影響を除
去できるので、剥離部分について年間を通じて信頼性の
高い判定が可能である。 (3)剥離厚が小さい場合、外装材が厚過ぎる場合、日
照量が少ない場合など、密着部分と剥離部分の温度差が
小さく、従来の方法では判定不能であった場合にも正確
に剥離部分を判定することができる。The method of the present invention using the secondary thermal image displayed by the temperature difference has the following effects. (1) Compared with the conventional method, various error factors that are difficult to distinguish with the conventional determination method, such as the effect of heating inside the building, the effect of the building structure such as a cold bridge, and the effect of dirt on the wall surface are eliminated. As a result, the detection accuracy of the peeled portion is remarkably excellent, the determination work does not require skill, and personal error does not occur, so that highly reliable diagnosis can be performed. (2) Since it is possible to eliminate the influence of heating heat inside the building even in cold regions, it is possible to make a highly reliable determination of the peeled portion throughout the year. (3) Even if the peeling thickness is small, the exterior material is too thick, the amount of sunlight is small, etc., the temperature difference between the adhered portion and the peeled portion is small, and the peeled portion can be accurately detected even when the conventional method cannot determine. Can be determined.
【0010】[0010]
【実施例】以下、本発明の実施例を示す。なお以下の実
施例は本発明の例示であり本発明を限定するものではな
い。EXAMPLES Examples of the present invention will be shown below. The following examples are illustrative of the present invention and do not limit the present invention.
【0011】実施例1(試料試験) (A)試験壁の仕様 試験壁として、幅900mm ×高さ1700mm×厚さ150mm のP
C版を驅体とし、50mm角、100mm 角、200mm 角、300mm
角の剥離部分に0.1mm 厚のポリフィルムまたは厚さ1,2,
3mm のスチレンペーパを貼り付けた後に、厚さ20mm、30
mmのモルタルを塗布したものを用いた。 (B)試験条件 日の出から日没後2〜3時間経過後まで試験壁を日にさ
らし、30分毎に熱画像を記録した。同時に剥離部分の
表面温度と外気温、日照量、風速を測定した。試験は試
験壁の向きを変えて数回行った。試験壁の向き、試験日
の気象条件は表1のとおりである。試験は何れも同一場
所で行った。熱画像の撮影には3〜5μmの波長域を主
に検知する機種(SW機)と8〜13μmを主に検知する
機種(LW機)の2種を併用した。また、本発明の効果
を確認するために各試料に熱電対を取付けて表面温度を
実測し、さらに打音法による判定を併せて実施した。 Example 1 (Sample Test) (A) Specification of Test Wall As a test wall, a P having a width of 900 mm × height of 1700 mm × thickness of 150 mm was used.
50mm square, 100mm square, 200mm square, 300mm
0.1mm thick poly film or thickness 1,2,
After attaching 3mm styrene paper, thickness 20mm, 30
The one coated with mm mortar was used. (B) Test condition The test wall was exposed to the sun from sunrise to 2-3 hours after sunset, and a thermal image was recorded every 30 minutes. At the same time, the surface temperature of the peeled portion, the outside air temperature, the amount of sunlight, and the wind speed were measured. The test was performed several times by changing the direction of the test wall. Table 1 shows the orientation of the test wall and the weather conditions on the test day. All tests were conducted in the same place. For thermal image capturing, two types were used in combination, a model mainly detecting a wavelength range of 3 to 5 μm (SW machine) and a model mainly detecting 8 to 13 μm (LW machine). Further, in order to confirm the effect of the present invention, a thermocouple was attached to each sample, the surface temperature was measured, and determination by the tapping method was also performed.
【0012】(D)試験結果 上記試験結果を表2に示した。また打音法による結果を
表3に示した。上記試験により次のことが確認された。 (1) 剥離部分の現れかたと時間帯 熱画像上で剥離部の高温域が現れた時間帯は、南東、南
西、南の各面では最も長い部分で日射量のピーク時を挟
んで約5〜6時間、晴天時の北面では外気温のピーク時
を挟んで約6時間であり、剥離部が最も鮮明なのは概ね
日射量のピーク時(北面では外気温のピーク時)であ
る。なお、剥離状態と赤外線カメラの検知波長帯によっ
て差が認められた。また試料によっては直接日射がなく
なった直後から、剥離部が低温で現れるものがあり、更
に1〜2時間経つと明瞭になった。また、北面で日射が
当たらなくても十分な外気温の変動量があれば温度差が
生じる。 (2) 剥離厚による差 剥離厚が大きいほど剥離部と健全部の温度差が大きく、
輪郭も鮮明に現れ、剥離部を判別できる時間帯も長い。 (3) 剥離面積による差 剥離面積が大きいほど剥離部の輪郭は鮮明である。50mm
角については実測でも温度差がほとんどなく、検知不能
である。 100mm角についても稀に温度差のあることがわ
る程度であり輪郭までは判らない、 200mm角以上につい
ては輪郭まで判別できる。 (4) モルタル厚による差 モルタル厚の薄いほうが、日射量や外気温の変動に敏感
に反応する。即ちモルタル厚が薄いほうが剥離部で日中
の高温域と夕方の低温域が現れるのが早く、消えるのも
早い。またモルタルの薄いほうが剥離部の輪郭が鮮明
で、剥離厚の薄いものまで判別できる。 (5) 赤外線カメラによる差 LW機(長波長機)とSW機(短波長機)では、概ねL
W機(長波長機)の画像のほうが鮮明で剥離部の判別精
度が高く、判別可能時間帯も長い。SW機では直射日光
が当たっている時の壁面での反射光が映りやすいことが
最大の原因である。また壁面温度が低い場合、SW機で
は画像が不鮮明であり、寒冷期の診断には不利である。
ランプ等で人為的に外乱を与えた場合もSW機のほうが
影響を受けやすい。一方、図1に示すように、熱画像上
の表示温度と実測温度とを比べると、LW機では全体に
実測温度よりやや高めに表示されてる。SW機では日射
が当たっていない時はやや低めであるが、日射が当たっ
ているときは高めに表示され、反射率が大きいほど実測
温度との差が大きい。 (6) 打音法との比較 剥離部分の打音法による検知結果と比較すると、剥離面
積の小さいものは打音法でも検知できないが、、剥離厚
0mmについては、剥離面積が大きければ検知できる。剥
離厚1mm以上ではLW機による熱画像と打音法による判
別結果に大差ない。(D) Test Results The above test results are shown in Table 2. The results obtained by the tapping method are shown in Table 3. The above tests confirmed the following. (1) Appearance of peeling portion and time zone The time zone when the high temperature region of the peeling portion appears on the thermal image is the longest portion on each of the southeast, southwest, and south planes, and it is about 5 times across the peak of solar radiation. It is about 6 hours, and it is about 6 hours on the north side in fine weather, with the outside air temperature being at the peak, and the peeling part is most clear at the peak of the amount of solar radiation (at the outside temperature on the north side). A difference was recognized depending on the peeling state and the wavelength band detected by the infrared camera. In some samples, the peeled portion appeared at a low temperature immediately after the direct solar radiation disappeared, and became clear after a further 1 to 2 hours. Even if there is no insolation on the north side, there will be a temperature difference if there is a sufficient amount of fluctuation in the outside air temperature. (2) Difference due to peeling thickness The larger the peeling thickness, the larger the temperature difference between the peeled part and the sound part,
The contours also appear clearly, and the time period for distinguishing the peeled part is long. (3) Difference due to peeled area The larger the peeled area, the clearer the contour of the peeled portion. 50 mm
Regarding the corner, there is almost no temperature difference even when actually measured, and it cannot be detected. Even for 100 mm square, there is rarely a temperature difference and the contour cannot be determined. For 200 mm square or more, the contour can be determined. (4) Difference in mortar thickness A thinner mortar reacts more sensitively to changes in solar radiation and outside air temperature. That is, the thinner the mortar is, the faster the daytime high temperature area and the evening low temperature area appear at the exfoliation part, and the faster they disappear. In addition, the thinner the mortar, the sharper the contour of the peeled portion, and the thinner the mortar, the thinner the mortar can be discriminated. (5) Difference by infrared camera About LW machine (long wavelength machine) and SW machine (short wavelength machine)
The image of the W machine (long wavelength machine) is clearer, the discrimination accuracy of the peeled portion is higher, and the discriminable time period is longer. The biggest cause of the SW machine is that reflected light from the wall surface is easily reflected when it is exposed to direct sunlight. Further, when the wall surface temperature is low, the image is unclear on the SW machine, which is disadvantageous for diagnosis in the cold season.
The SW machine is more likely to be affected even when artificially disturbed by a lamp or the like. On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 1, when the display temperature on the thermal image is compared with the actually measured temperature, the LW machine as a whole is displayed slightly higher than the actually measured temperature. In the SW machine, it is slightly low when the solar radiation is not hit, but it is displayed higher when the solar radiation is hit, and the larger the reflectance is, the larger the difference from the measured temperature is. (6) Comparison with tapping method Compared with the detection result of the tapping method of the peeled part, the one with a small peeling area cannot be detected by the tapping method, but a peeling thickness of 0 mm can be detected if the peeling area is large. .. When the peeling thickness is 1 mm or more, there is no great difference between the thermal image by the LW machine and the discrimination result by the tapping method.
【0013】実施例2(建物試験) (A)試験建物 東西方向に細長い壁式鉄筋コンクリート造4階建、外装
はモルタル20〜30mmの上リンシ吹付け仕上げ、築年数3
0年間大規模な外壁捕集を行っていない。建物周囲には
立木が少なく日射を遮る近隣の建物はない。 (B)試験条件 外壁の熱画像は日の出時から日没後約3時間経過後まで
30分ごとに測定。建物の各面を赤外線カメラ(SW
機、LW機)で撮影。外気温、気候、建物各面の日照量
および風速は表1のとおりである。測定時期は春と夏の
2回である。また建物の測定箇所に熱電対を取付けて表
面温度を実測した。試験結果を図2(A)(B)(C) および図
3(A)(B)(C) に示した。 Example 2 (Building test) (A) Test building Four-story wall-type reinforced concrete structure elongated in the east and west directions, exterior mortar 20 to 30 mm finished by spraying with rinsing, building age 3
No large-scale collection of outer walls for 0 years. There are no standing trees around the building and there are no nearby buildings that block sunlight. (B) Test conditions Thermal images of the outer wall are measured every 30 minutes from sunrise to about 3 hours after sunset. Infrared camera (SW) on each side of the building
Machine, LW machine). Table 1 shows the outside temperature, climate, sunshine on each side of the building, and wind speed. The measurement period is twice in spring and summer. A thermocouple was attached to the measurement point of the building to measure the surface temperature. The test results are shown in FIGS. 2 (A) (B) (C) and FIGS. 3 (A) (B) (C).
【0014】(C)試験結果 (1) 春季試験 春季の試験は暖房期間中であるため、日射前は熱画像中
に床スラブや間仕切り壁と外壁との取合い部分などの冷
橋からの熱漏れが現れており [図2(A)]、また日射後は
剥離部分の高温域と冷橋による高温域とが混在しており
[図2(B)]、いずれも1時刻の熱画像では剥離部分を特
定できない。これらの測定結果を本発明に従って差分処
理を行い、2時刻の温度差によって表した2次熱画像
[図2(C)]では冷橋からの熱漏れが排除されており、剥
離部分が周囲の健全部に比較して明瞭に現れている。ま
た、この温度差で表示することにより壁面の汚れなど時
刻による変動の少ないノイズが排除され、一次熱画像で
はノイズに埋もれた剥離域が2次熱画像では明瞭に現れ
る。 (2) 夏季試験 建物北面についての夏季の試験では、日射量不足や日射
が不均一であるため、日射によらず、外気温のピーク時
[図3(A)]と夜間 [図3(B)]の2時刻間の温度差 [図3
(C)]を用いることにより剥離域を正確に判定できる。 (3) 実測温度との比較 冷橋の影響が無ければ、健全部と剥離部の温度差が概ね
1℃以下のとき、1時刻の温度で表示した1次熱画像で
は剥離部を特定することができないが、本発明の温度差
による2次熱画像によれば、健全部と剥離部の温度差が
0.5℃程度でも剥離部を特定できる。(C) Test results (1) Spring test Since the spring test is during the heating period, heat leakage from the cold bridge such as the floor slab and the joint between the partition wall and the outer wall is observed in the thermal image before solar radiation. Is visible [Fig. 2 (A)], and after insolation, the high temperature region of the peeling part and the high temperature region due to the cold bridge are mixed.
[FIG. 2 (B)] In both cases, the peeled portion cannot be identified from the thermal image at 1 hour. A secondary thermal image in which these measurement results are subjected to difference processing according to the present invention and expressed by a temperature difference at two times
In [Fig. 2 (C)], the heat leakage from the cold bridge is eliminated, and the peeled portion is clearly shown in comparison with the surrounding sound part. Further, by displaying the temperature difference, noise such as stains on the wall surface, which does not fluctuate with time, is eliminated, and the peeled area buried in the noise appears clearly in the secondary thermal image in the primary thermal image. (2) Summer test In the summer test on the north side of the building, due to lack of insolation and uneven insolation, the outside temperature does not depend on
Temperature difference between two times [Fig. 3 (A)] and night [Fig. 3 (B)]
By using (C)], the peeled area can be accurately determined. (3) Comparison with measured temperature If there is no influence of the cold bridge, when the temperature difference between the sound part and the peeling part is approximately 1 ° C or less, specify the peeling part in the primary thermal image displayed at the temperature at one time. However, according to the secondary thermal image due to the temperature difference of the present invention, the peeled portion can be specified even if the temperature difference between the sound portion and the peeled portion is about 0.5 ° C.
【図1】 実施例1における実測温度と熱画像表示温度
を示すグラフ。FIG. 1 is a graph showing an actually measured temperature and a thermal image display temperature in Example 1.
【図2】 実施例2の春季試験の結果を示す熱画像の模
式図であり、(A)(B)は日射前と日射後の1次熱画像、
(C) はこれらの温度差による2次熱画像、図中暗色部分
が高温域である。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of thermal images showing the results of the spring test of Example 2, (A) and (B) being primary thermal images before and after solar irradiation,
(C) is the secondary thermal image due to these temperature differences, and the dark part in the figure is the high temperature region.
【図3】 実施例2の夏季試験の結果を示す熱画像の模
式図であり、(A)(B)は日射前と日射後の1次熱画像、
(C) はこれらの温度差による2次熱画像、図中暗色部分
が高温域である。FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of thermal images showing the results of the summer test of Example 2, (A) and (B) being primary thermal images before and after solar irradiation,
(C) is the secondary thermal image due to these temperature differences, and the dark part in the figure is the high temperature region.
【表1】 [Table 1]
【表3】 [Table 3]
【表2】 [Table 2]
フロントページの続き (72)発明者 瀬尾 典昭 北海道札幌市東区北16条東19丁目1番16号 日本データーサービス株式会社内 (72)発明者 内海 亮 北海道登別市幌別町6丁目5番地1 株式 会社東亜・ソロ・リフォーム内 (72)発明者 飛嶋 修 北海道札幌市白石区菊水6条2丁目3番25 号 札幌パーカライジング株式会社内 (72)発明者 井村 秀美 北海道札幌市豊平区美園8条3丁目1番10 号 株式会社ケミカル内 (72)発明者 氷見 敦 北海道札幌市中央区北1条西2丁目11−1 株式会社ユディット内Front Page Continuation (72) Inventor Noriaki Seo 19-16 Kita 16 Higashi, Higashi-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido Japan Data Service Co., Ltd. In the Toa Solo Reform (72) Inventor Osamu Tobishima 6-3-25 Kikusui, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido Inside Sapporo Parkerizing Co., Ltd. No. 10 Chemical Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Atsushi Himi 2-1-1, Kita 1-jo Nishi, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido Udit Co., Ltd.
Claims (3)
剥離部との温度差によって剥離部を判定する方法におい
て、外壁について高温時と低温時の少なくとも2時刻の
温度差を熱画像によって求め、該温度差が小さく現れる
密着部に対して該温度差が大きく現れる剥離部を該温度
差によって検出することを特徴とする熱画像による外壁
剥離部の検出方法。1. A method for determining a peeling portion based on a temperature difference between a close contact portion and a peeling portion of the outer wall shown in a thermal image of the outer wall, wherein the temperature difference between the high temperature and the low temperature of the outer wall is at least two times. A method of detecting an outer wall peeling portion by a thermal image, wherein the peeling portion where the temperature difference is large is detected with respect to the close contact portion where the temperature difference is small, by the temperature difference.
時と日照後の低温時の少なくとも2時刻の温度を求め、
この日照量の差に基づく温度差によって剥離部を検出す
る請求項1の方法。2. The temperature of the outer wall at least at two times when the temperature is high during the day when the amount of sunlight is large and when the temperature is low after the sunshine,
The method according to claim 1, wherein the peeling portion is detected by a temperature difference based on the difference in the amount of sunlight.
帯と夕方ないし夜間の外気温の低い時間帯の少なくとも
2時刻の温度を求め、この1日の気温差に基づく温度差
によって剥離部を検出する請求項1の方法。3. The temperature of the outer wall at least two times during the daytime when the outside air temperature is high and in the evening or at night when the outside air temperature is low, and the peeling portion is obtained by the temperature difference based on the temperature difference during the day. The method of claim 1, wherein
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP24645893A JPH0777460A (en) | 1993-09-07 | 1993-09-07 | Detecting method for outer wall peel section with thermal image |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP24645893A JPH0777460A (en) | 1993-09-07 | 1993-09-07 | Detecting method for outer wall peel section with thermal image |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH0777460A true JPH0777460A (en) | 1995-03-20 |
Family
ID=17148732
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP24645893A Pending JPH0777460A (en) | 1993-09-07 | 1993-09-07 | Detecting method for outer wall peel section with thermal image |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH0777460A (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2010117259A (en) * | 2008-11-13 | 2010-05-27 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method, device and program for detecting deformed portion on building wall surface |
JP2011198099A (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2011-10-06 | Fujitsu Ltd | Image processor and image processing program |
JP2016006398A (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2016-01-14 | 西日本高速道路エンジニアリング四国株式会社 | Predictive diagnosis method of spall of concrete structure |
JP2017207296A (en) * | 2016-05-16 | 2017-11-24 | 日本アビオニクス株式会社 | Building structure external wall diagnosis aptitude determination device |
-
1993
- 1993-09-07 JP JP24645893A patent/JPH0777460A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2010117259A (en) * | 2008-11-13 | 2010-05-27 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method, device and program for detecting deformed portion on building wall surface |
JP2011198099A (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2011-10-06 | Fujitsu Ltd | Image processor and image processing program |
JP2016006398A (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2016-01-14 | 西日本高速道路エンジニアリング四国株式会社 | Predictive diagnosis method of spall of concrete structure |
JP2017207296A (en) * | 2016-05-16 | 2017-11-24 | 日本アビオニクス株式会社 | Building structure external wall diagnosis aptitude determination device |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5816703A (en) | Method of detecting defects of a structure | |
Lourenço et al. | Anomalies detection in adhesive wall tiling systems by infrared thermography | |
Ocaña et al. | Thermographic survey of two rural buildings in Spain | |
Libois et al. | Summertime evolution of snow specific surface area close to the surface on the Antarctic Plateau | |
Pearson | Thermal imaging of building fabric | |
Garrido et al. | Introduction of active thermography and automatic defect segmentation in the thermographic inspection of specimens of ceramic tiling for building façades | |
Costanzo et al. | Proper evaluation of the external convective heat transfer for the thermal analysis of cool roofs | |
Li et al. | Application of infrared thermography technique in building finish evaluation | |
US20230119076A1 (en) | Autonomous polarimetric imaging for photovoltaic module inspection and methods thereof | |
JP4206997B2 (en) | Exterior improvement planning system | |
JPH0777460A (en) | Detecting method for outer wall peel section with thermal image | |
JP2002157676A (en) | Road surface state discriminating method of visible image type road surface state grasping device | |
CN112254657A (en) | Intelligent snow removal robot scheduling method based on visual perception | |
JP3500425B2 (en) | Road surface condition judgment method in visible image type road surface condition grasping device | |
Alchapar et al. | Mathematical models to assessment the energy performance of textured cladding for facades | |
Snell et al. | Nondestructive testing of building envelope systems using infrared thermography | |
JPH09145648A (en) | Detection of defect in structure | |
JPH09145649A (en) | Method for detecting floating defect of outer wall of structure | |
JP4448553B1 (en) | Deformation detection method of concrete surface layer by passive infrared method | |
JPS61139751A (en) | Method for inspecting released part of wall surface | |
JP2915641B2 (en) | Exterior wall peeling detector | |
JP3269895B2 (en) | Method of evaluating coating film of inorganic plate | |
JPH1082750A (en) | Method and apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of sprayed slope | |
JP2019039849A (en) | Ceiling joint inspection method | |
Grey et al. | Infrared Technology application in Building Envelopes: Applications, ASTM Standards, and Limitations |