JPH0764650B2 - Spray repair material for metal refining furnace - Google Patents

Spray repair material for metal refining furnace

Info

Publication number
JPH0764650B2
JPH0764650B2 JP61301943A JP30194386A JPH0764650B2 JP H0764650 B2 JPH0764650 B2 JP H0764650B2 JP 61301943 A JP61301943 A JP 61301943A JP 30194386 A JP30194386 A JP 30194386A JP H0764650 B2 JPH0764650 B2 JP H0764650B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
weight
raw material
parts
repair material
magnesia
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP61301943A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS63156078A (en
Inventor
和夫 内田
松一 吉村
辰男 川上
Original Assignee
川崎炉材株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 川崎炉材株式会社 filed Critical 川崎炉材株式会社
Priority to JP61301943A priority Critical patent/JPH0764650B2/en
Publication of JPS63156078A publication Critical patent/JPS63156078A/en
Publication of JPH0764650B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0764650B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Ceramic Products (AREA)
  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 産業上の利用分野 本発明は、金属精錬炉用吹付補修材に関する。TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a spray repair material for a metal refining furnace.

従来の技術とその問題点 近年転炉等の金属精錬炉において、内張り材として耐用
性に優れたマグネシア−炭素質煉瓦が使用されるように
なるとともに、スラグライン部等の局部溶損の補修が炉
寿命を大きく左右するようになってきた。従来局部溶損
箇所を補修するに当っては、主に吹付補修法が採用され
ている。これは、耐火原料と結合剤とからなる混合物
(吹付材)を吹付ノズルの先で水と混合し、炉壁に吹付
けて補修層を形成させる方法である。従来吹付材として
は、吹付時の施工性、特に炉壁への付着性を重視して、
マグネシア質、ドロマイト質、マグネシア−ドロマイト
(以下マグドロという)質等の塩基性耐火原料、リン酸
塩等の結合剤及びマグネシア超微粉、ライム化合物等の
リン酸塩の硬化剤を含む高粘性且つ早硬化性のものが主
に使用されてきた。ところが、1)これらの補修材で
は、その耐用性及び熱間強度が不充分であること、2)
最近の操業条件の変更によって、トラニオン部等の急傾
斜箇所の溶損がなくなり、スラグライン等の緩傾斜部分
のみが溶損するようになったこと等の理由により、低粘
性且つ遅硬化性の補修材が望まれるようになってきた。
これは、低粘性且つ遅硬化性の補修材は、熱間での施工
時に材料が沸騰するため、充填と乾燥とが同時に進行
し、施工体が緻密となり、施工体の耐用性及び強度が向
上するという利点を有しているからである。従って、遅
硬化性の補修材を得るために、従来の補修材の成分中リ
ン酸塩の硬化剤を添加しないもの等が使用されている
が、以下の如き欠点があり好ましくない。即ち、ドロマ
イト質、マグドロ質等のドロマイト含有原料を使用する
と、材料の沸騰期間中にドロマイト原料から溶出するカ
ルシアと結合剤であるリン酸ナトリウムとが反応して水
に不溶な高分子リン酸塩が生成し、硬化が早くなるとい
う問題点が生じる。一方マグネシア原料は、リン酸ナト
リウムとの反応性に乏しいが、耐用性、特に熱間での体
積安定性に欠け、またスラグ浸透が大きいので構造スポ
ーリングの発生が著るしい等の材質としてマグドロ材質
よりも劣る欠点を有している。
Conventional technology and its problems In recent years, in metal refining furnaces such as converters, magnesia-carbonaceous bricks with excellent durability have come to be used as lining materials, and local erosion damage such as slag line parts is repaired. The life of the furnace has come to be greatly affected. Conventionally, the spray repair method has been mainly used to repair the locally melted portion. This is a method of forming a repair layer by mixing a mixture of a refractory raw material and a binder (spray material) with water at the tip of a spray nozzle and spraying the mixture on a furnace wall. As a conventional spray material, the workability at the time of spraying, especially the adhesion to the furnace wall, is emphasized,
Highly viscous and fast containing basic refractory raw materials such as magnesia, dolomite, magnesia-dromite (hereinafter referred to as magdro), binders such as phosphates, and hardeners for phosphates such as ultrafine powder of magnesia and lime compounds. Curable materials have been mainly used. However, 1) these repair materials have insufficient durability and hot strength, 2)
Due to the recent changes in operating conditions, melting of steep slopes such as trunnions has disappeared, and only mildly sloped parts such as slag lines have melted, so repairs with low viscosity and slow hardening are possible. The material has come to be desired.
This is because the low-viscosity and slow-hardening repair material boils during hot working, so filling and drying proceed at the same time, making the working body dense, and improving the durability and strength of the working body. This is because it has the advantage of Therefore, in order to obtain a slow-curing repair material, a material in which a phosphate curing agent is not added to the components of the conventional repair material is used, but the following drawbacks are not preferable. That is, when dolomite-containing raw materials such as dolomite and magdolo are used, water-insoluble polymer phosphate reacts with calcia that is eluted from the dolomite raw material during the boiling period of the material and sodium phosphate that is a binder. Is generated, which causes a problem that the curing is accelerated. On the other hand, the magnesia raw material has poor reactivity with sodium phosphate, but lacks in durability, especially volume stability in the hot state, and has large slag penetration, so that structural spalling is prominent. It has the disadvantage that it is inferior to the material.

問題点を解決するための手段 本発明者は、上記従来技術の問題点に鑑みて鋭意研究を
重ねた結果、マグドロ原料を耐火骨材として使用して
も、縮合リン酸とリンを含有しない強電解質のアルカリ
塩とを併用し、且つアルカリを含有することによる吹付
材の熱間強度の低下を防止するために難水溶性のリン酸
カルシウムを添加することによって、遅硬化性であり、
耐食性等の耐用性に著るしく優れ、炉壁との接着強度が
高い金属精錬炉用吹付補修材が得られることを見い出
し、本発明を完成した。
Means for Solving the Problems The inventors of the present invention have conducted extensive studies in view of the problems of the above-mentioned conventional techniques, and as a result, even if the Magdoro raw material is used as a refractory aggregate, it does not contain condensed phosphoric acid and phosphorus. In combination with an alkaline salt of the electrolyte, and by adding a sparingly water-soluble calcium phosphate in order to prevent a decrease in hot strength of the spraying material due to containing an alkali, slow curing,
The inventors have found that a spray repair material for a metal refining furnace, which is extremely excellent in durability such as corrosion resistance and has a high adhesive strength with a furnace wall, can be obtained, and completed the present invention.

即ち本発明は、ドロマイト原料30〜70重量%とマグネシ
ア原料70〜30重量%とから成る耐火原料100重量部、縮
合リン酸ナトリウム2.5〜7.0重量部、強電解質のアルカ
リ塩0.2〜1.5重量部及び難溶性リン酸カルシウム0.3〜
1.5重量部を含有する金属精錬炉用吹付補修材に係る。
That is, the present invention is a refractory raw material 100 parts by weight consisting of dolomite raw material 30 to 70% by weight and magnesia raw material 70 to 30% by weight, condensed sodium phosphate 2.5 to 7.0 parts by weight, strong electrolyte alkali salt 0.2 to 1.5 parts by weight and Slightly soluble calcium phosphate 0.3〜
It relates to spray repair material for metal refining furnace containing 1.5 parts by weight.

本発明では、耐火原料としてドロマイト原料及びマグネ
シア原料を使用する。
In the present invention, dolomite raw material and magnesia raw material are used as the refractory raw material.

ドロマイト原料としては、この分野で常用されるものが
何れも使用できるが、通常カルシア含量40%以上、嵩比
重3.20以上のものを使用する。但し、材料の体積安定
性、スラグ浸透防止性等を考慮すると、特にカルシア含
量が55%以上のものが好ましい。ドロマイト原料の配合
量は、耐火原料全量の30〜70重量%程度とするのがよ
い。30重量%未満では、カルシアの効果がほとんど発揮
されず、一方70重量%を越えると、ダスティングのため
に、ドロマイト微粉が使用できない関係上、粒度構成で
制約を打て、吹付作業性、耐食性等が低下する。
As the dolomite raw material, any of those commonly used in this field can be used, but normally a calcia content of 40% or more and a bulk specific gravity of 3.20 or more are used. However, considering the volume stability of the material, the slag permeation-preventing property, etc., the calcia content is particularly preferably 55% or more. The amount of dolomite raw material is preferably about 30 to 70% by weight of the total amount of refractory raw material. If it is less than 30% by weight, the effect of calcia is hardly exerted, while if it exceeds 70% by weight, due to dusting, dolomite fine powder cannot be used, so the grain size composition limits the spraying workability and corrosion resistance. Etc. will decrease.

マグネシア原料としては、海水マグネシア、電融マグネ
シア、天然マグネシア等この分野で常用されるものが使
用できるが、通常マグネシア含量92%、SiO2含量5%以
下、CaO/SiO2=0.3以上のものを使用する。
As the magnesia raw material, those commonly used in this field such as seawater magnesia, electrofused magnesia and natural magnesia can be used, but normally, magnesia content 92%, SiO 2 content 5% or less, CaO / SiO 2 = 0.3 or more. use.

耐火原料の粒径は特に限定されず、適宜選択すればよい
が、通常粒径5〜1mm程度の粗粒を30〜50%程度、粒径1
mm以下の中間粒を20〜40%程度及び0.074mm以下の微粉
を20〜40%程度含むようにして使用すればよい。但し、
材料のダスティングを考慮すると、粒径0.074mm以下の
ドロマイト微粉を使用しないほうが望ましい。
The particle size of the refractory raw material is not particularly limited and may be appropriately selected. Usually, coarse particles having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm are about 30 to 50%, and particle size 1
It may be used by containing about 20 to 40% of intermediate particles of mm or less and about 20 to 40% of fine powder of 0.074 mm or less. However,
Considering the dusting of the material, it is desirable not to use dolomite fine powder having a particle size of 0.074 mm or less.

本発明では、縮合リン酸ナトリウムとリンを含有しない
強電解質のアルカリ塩とを併用することによって、補修
材の硬化を遅延させる。これは、塩析現象、即ち2種の
強電解質塩の水への溶解度が互いの濃度によって影響さ
れ、通常単独の場合より低下するという現象を利用した
ものであり、これによって、硬化反応即ち水溶性のリン
酸ナトリウムのNaイオンと材料中のCaイオンとが置換し
て、水に不溶な高分子リン酸塩が生成するという反応が
遅延されるのである。
In the present invention, the curing of the repair material is delayed by using the condensed sodium phosphate in combination with the alkali salt of the strong electrolyte containing no phosphorus. This utilizes a salting-out phenomenon, that is, the solubility of two types of strong electrolyte salts in water is influenced by the concentration of each other, and is usually lower than that of a single substance. The reaction is delayed, in which the sodium ion of the water-soluble sodium phosphate is replaced with the Ca ion in the material to form a water-insoluble polymer phosphate.

縮合リン酸ナトリウムとしては、通常のものが何れも使
用でき、例えば、ピロリン酸ナトリウム、トリポリリン
酸ナトリウム、テトラボリリン酸ナトリウム、ヘキサメ
タリン酸ナトリウム等を挙げることができる。その配合
量は、耐火原料100重量部に対し2.5〜7.0重量部程度と
するのがよい。2.5重量部未満では、使用初期に充分な
接着強度が発現されず、一方7.0重量部を越えると、材
料中のフラックス量が増加して耐食性が低下する。
As the condensed sodium phosphate, any ordinary one can be used, and examples thereof include sodium pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium tetraboriphosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate and the like. The blending amount is preferably about 2.5 to 7.0 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of the refractory raw material. If it is less than 2.5 parts by weight, sufficient adhesive strength will not be exhibited in the initial stage of use, while if it exceeds 7.0 parts by weight, the amount of flux in the material will increase and corrosion resistance will decrease.

リンを含有しない強電解質のアルカリ塩としては、溶解
度が10以上の弱酸性から弱塩基性のナトリウム塩若しく
はカリウム塩が何れも使用でき、例えば、NaCl、KCl等
の塩化物、 Na2CO3、K2CO3等の炭酸塩、 CH3COONa等の酢酸塩等を挙げることができる。その配合
量、耐火原料100重量に対し0.2〜1.5重量部程度とする
のがよい。0.2重量部未満では、硬化遅延効果が乏し
く、一方1.5重量部を越えると、リン酸塩の溶解量が減
少し、乾燥後の強度が発現しにくくくなるとともに、C
l、CO2等の加熱中に分解する成分を有するため、昇熱中
に爆裂する、耐食性が低下する等の問題点が生ずる。
As the alkali salt of a strong electrolyte containing no phosphorus, any of a weakly acidic to weakly basic sodium salt or potassium salt having a solubility of 10 or more can be used, for example, chlorides such as NaCl and KCl, Na 2 CO 3 , Examples thereof include carbonates such as K 2 CO 3 and acetates such as CH 3 COONa. The blending amount thereof is preferably about 0.2 to 1.5 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of the refractory raw material. If it is less than 0.2 parts by weight, the curing retarding effect is poor, while if it exceeds 1.5 parts by weight, the amount of phosphate dissolved decreases, and the strength after drying becomes difficult to develop, and C
Since it has a component that decomposes during heating, such as l and CO 2 , problems such as explosion during heating and deterioration of corrosion resistance occur.

難水溶性リン酸カルシウムとしては、通常のものが何れ
も使用でき、例えば、第2リン酸カルシウム、第3リン
酸カルシウム、ピロリン酸カルシウム等を挙げることが
できる。その配合量は、耐火原料100重量部に対し0.3〜
1.5重量部程度とするのがよい。0.3重量部未満では、熱
間強度向上効果が少く、一方1.5重量部を越えても効果
が余り変らず不経済である。
As the poorly water-soluble calcium phosphate, any ordinary calcium phosphate can be used, and examples thereof include dibasic calcium phosphate, tribasic calcium phosphate, and pyrophosphate calcium. The blending amount is 0.3 to 100 parts by weight of the refractory raw material.
It should be about 1.5 parts by weight. If it is less than 0.3 parts by weight, the effect of improving the hot strength is small, while if it exceeds 1.5 parts by weight, the effect is not so changed and it is uneconomical.

本発明補修材は、上記各原料の所定量を、常法に従い、
例えば、アイリッヒミキサー等で混合することによって
製造される。
The repair material of the present invention, a predetermined amount of each of the above raw materials, according to a conventional method,
For example, it is produced by mixing with an Erich mixer or the like.

本発明補修材を用いて溶損個所の補修を行なうに当って
は、この分野で行なわれている吹付補修方法が何れも採
用できる。
In repairing the melted point using the repair material of the present invention, any spray repair method performed in this field can be adopted.

発明の効果 本発明金属精錬炉用吹付補修材は、極めて優れた耐食性
及び炉壁への接着強度を有し、著るしく高い耐用性を示
す。
EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION The spray repair material for a metal refining furnace of the present invention has extremely excellent corrosion resistance and adhesion strength to the furnace wall, and exhibits remarkably high durability.

実 施 例 以下に実施例及び比較例を挙げ、本発明をより一層明瞭
なものとする。
Examples The following examples and comparative examples will further clarify the present invention.

実施例1〜5及び比較例1,2 耐火原料100重量部に対し、第1表に示す配合割合(重
量部)で各原料を加え、アイリッヒミキサーで混合し、
本発明補修材及び従来の補修材を製造した。尚ドロマイ
ト原料としては、カルシア含量58%、嵩比重3.25の天然
ドロマイトを、マグネシア原料としては、マグネシア含
量94%、SiO2含量2.5%、CaO/SiO2=0.4の海水マグネシ
アを、また縮合リン酸としては、Na2O含量23%、P2O5
量63%のテトラポリリン酸ナトリウムを用いた。
Examples 1 to 5 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 To 100 parts by weight of the refractory raw material, each raw material was added at a mixing ratio (parts by weight) shown in Table 1, and mixed by an Erich mixer.
The repair material of the present invention and a conventional repair material were manufactured. As the dolomite raw material, natural dolomite with a calcia content of 58% and a bulk specific gravity of 3.25 was used.As the magnesia raw material, magnesia content of 94%, SiO 2 content of 2.5%, seawater magnesia of CaO / SiO 2 = 0.4, and condensed phosphoric acid were used. As the material, sodium tetrapolyphosphate having a Na 2 O content of 23% and a P 2 O 5 content of 63% was used.

得られた補修材を水と混練した後、酸素−プロパン炉中
で、1200℃に加熱されている煉瓦枠に流し込み、その硬
化性状を判定するとともに、後記品質試験に供する施工
体試料を作製した。試料の寸法は、170×300×60mmであ
り、170×300mmの面が煉瓦枠の敷煉瓦(ドロマイト質、
250×350×110mm)に接着するようにした。敷煉瓦表面
には、予めスラグコーティングを施し、施工体(補修
層)を敷煉瓦とがスラグ面を介して接着されるようにし
た。得られた施工体試料について、緻密性及び耐食性を
調べた。緻密性試験としては、JISR−2205に準じ、気孔
率と嵩比重を測定した。耐食性試験としては、施工体試
料から、外寸法径50mm×高さ50mm、凹部寸法径20mm×高
さ20mmのルツボ型試料を切り出し、この試料に30gの転
炉スラグを充填し、次いでこれを酸素−プロパン炉にお
いて1700℃で3時間焼成した後、該ルツボ型試料を縦方
向に切断し、スラグによる溶損面積及びスラグの浸透面
積を測定した。接着強度は、敷き煉瓦と施工体とからな
る寸法40×40×120mmの試料を切り出し、JISR−2213に
準じて接着界面を中心として常温曲げ強度試験を行なっ
て測定した。結果を第1表に示す。
After kneading the obtained repair material with water, it was poured into a brick frame heated to 1200 ° C. in an oxygen-propane furnace, and its hardening property was determined, and a construction body sample to be subjected to the quality test described later was prepared. . The size of the sample is 170 × 300 × 60 mm, and the brick with a 170 × 300 mm surface is a brick frame (dolomite,
250 x 350 x 110 mm). Slag coating was applied to the surface of the brick in advance so that the construction body (repair layer) was bonded to the brick through the slag surface. With respect to the obtained construction body sample, the denseness and the corrosion resistance were examined. As the denseness test, the porosity and bulk specific gravity were measured according to JISR-2205. As a corrosion resistance test, a crucible type sample with an outer dimension diameter of 50 mm × height of 50 mm and a concave dimension diameter of 20 mm × height of 20 mm was cut out from the construction body sample, and 30 g of converter slag was filled into this sample, which was then oxygen-containing. After firing in a propane furnace at 1700 ° C. for 3 hours, the crucible type sample was cut in the vertical direction, and the erosion area due to slag and the permeation area of slag were measured. The adhesive strength was measured by cutting out a sample having a size of 40 × 40 × 120 mm consisting of a laid brick and a construction body, and performing a room temperature bending strength test centering on the adhesive interface according to JIS R-2213. The results are shown in Table 1.

第1表から、本発明補修材が従来の補修材に比べ、硬化
時間が長く、緻密性に優れ、耐食性、接着強度等に優れ
ていることが判る。
It can be seen from Table 1 that the repair material of the present invention has a longer curing time, is superior in denseness, is superior in corrosion resistance, and is superior in adhesive strength to the conventional repair materials.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】ドロマイト原料30〜70重量%とマグネシア
原料70〜30重量%とから成る耐火原料100重量部、縮合
リン酸ナトリウム2.5〜7.0重量部、リンを含有しない強
電解質のアルカリ塩0.2〜1.5重量部及び難溶性リン酸カ
ルシウム0.3〜1.5重量部を含有する金属精錬炉用吹付補
修材。
1. A refractory raw material consisting of 30 to 70% by weight of dolomite raw material and 70 to 30% by weight of magnesia raw material, 2.5 to 7.0 parts by weight of condensed sodium phosphate, and an alkali salt of a strong electrolyte containing no phosphorus of 0.2 to Spray repair material for metal refining furnace containing 1.5 parts by weight and 0.3 to 1.5 parts by weight of sparingly soluble calcium phosphate.
JP61301943A 1986-12-17 1986-12-17 Spray repair material for metal refining furnace Expired - Lifetime JPH0764650B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP61301943A JPH0764650B2 (en) 1986-12-17 1986-12-17 Spray repair material for metal refining furnace

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP61301943A JPH0764650B2 (en) 1986-12-17 1986-12-17 Spray repair material for metal refining furnace

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS63156078A JPS63156078A (en) 1988-06-29
JPH0764650B2 true JPH0764650B2 (en) 1995-07-12

Family

ID=17902977

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP61301943A Expired - Lifetime JPH0764650B2 (en) 1986-12-17 1986-12-17 Spray repair material for metal refining furnace

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0764650B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4960906B2 (en) * 2008-03-07 2012-06-27 黒崎播磨株式会社 Hot filler
JP6408678B1 (en) * 2017-10-25 2018-10-17 黒崎播磨株式会社 Hot dry spray material and hot dry spray construction method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS63156078A (en) 1988-06-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
BR112016021690B1 (en) DRY REFRACTORY COMPOSITION
JPS585871B2 (en) Refractory material for flow casting
JPH0764650B2 (en) Spray repair material for metal refining furnace
EP0119812A2 (en) Monolithic refractory composition
JP6882587B1 (en) Dry spray material for firing pots
JP2023161293A (en) Monolithic refractory for dry spraying and dry spraying construction method using the same
CA1055053A (en) Monolithic refractories
JPH0648846A (en) Hot repairing spraying material for converter under less slag operation
EP0763508B1 (en) Gunning refractory composition
JP2695627B2 (en) Spray refractory composition
JP3126003B2 (en) Sprayed refractory
JPS61132568A (en) Tundish coating material for dry spraying
JPS591234B2 (en) Basic spray refractory composition
JPS6220476B2 (en)
JP6408678B1 (en) Hot dry spray material and hot dry spray construction method
JP2579104B2 (en) Spray material for hot repair of industrial kiln
JP6340131B1 (en) Hot repair spray material
JPH0429629B2 (en)
JP2001058879A (en) Substrate-treating agent for material for spray- repairing blast furnace gutter, material for spray- repairing blast furnace gutter, and spray application of blast furnace gutter
JP3037625B2 (en) Baking repair material
KR950007711B1 (en) Composition and method for coating refractrories mass
US3826662A (en) Refractory mix for patching the refractory lining in a blast furnace casting floor network
TW202021931A (en) Hot filling material
JPS61236657A (en) Spray method for refractory spray material
JP2006160558A (en) Gunning mixture