JPH07134118A - Method and apparatus for sorting sound - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for sorting soundInfo
- Publication number
- JPH07134118A JPH07134118A JP5279471A JP27947193A JPH07134118A JP H07134118 A JPH07134118 A JP H07134118A JP 5279471 A JP5279471 A JP 5279471A JP 27947193 A JP27947193 A JP 27947193A JP H07134118 A JPH07134118 A JP H07134118A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- sintered body
- resonance
- quality
- sound
- resonance sound
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、音響選別により焼結体
の良否を判別する音響選別方法および音響選別装置に関
する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an acoustic selection method and an acoustic selection device for determining the quality of a sintered body by acoustic selection.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】粉末冶金法で作製される焼結体は、成
形、焼成あるいは加工の各条件の微妙な相違によって、
焼結後にクラック等の品質不良を生じる場合がある。こ
のクラックは、焼結体を加工して得られた製品のワレ、
カケを引き起こす要因となる。例えばフェライト磁石
は、車載用モータ等に使用されるため、強度に対する信
頼性の要求が厳しく、ワレ、カケを防止するため厳しい
品質管理が行われている。2. Description of the Related Art Sintered bodies produced by the powder metallurgy method are subject to subtle differences in molding, firing or processing conditions.
Poor quality such as cracks may occur after sintering. This crack is a crack of the product obtained by processing the sintered body,
It becomes a factor that causes chipping. For example, since ferrite magnets are used in in-vehicle motors and the like, demands for reliability regarding strength are strict, and strict quality control is performed to prevent cracks and chips.
【0003】フェライト磁石のワレ、カケは、フェライ
ト磁石のマイクロクラックが原因であり、そのマイクロ
クラックの有無確認には、染色浸透探傷法、蛍光浸透探
傷法等の浸透探傷試験が用いられてきた。浸透探傷試験
は、赤色染料または蛍光物質を入れた浸透液にフェライ
ト磁石を浸漬し、欠陥部に赤色染料、蛍光物質を浸透さ
せ、その後欠陥部の赤色染料、蛍光物質を吸着微粉末で
現像し、生じる指示模様を目視で探し、クラックの有無
を判別する方法である。Cracks and cracks in ferrite magnets are caused by microcracks in the ferrite magnet. Penetrant flaw detection tests such as the dye penetrant flaw detection method and the fluorescent penetrant flaw detection method have been used to confirm the presence or absence of the microcracks. In the penetrant flaw detection test, a ferrite magnet is immersed in a penetrant containing a red dye or a fluorescent substance, the red dye and the fluorescent substance are permeated into the defective portion, and then the red dye and the fluorescent substance in the defective portion are developed with an adsorbing fine powder. Is a method of visually observing the generated instruction pattern and determining the presence or absence of cracks.
【0004】浸透探傷試験では、磁石表面のマイクロク
ッラクの有無は確認できるが、磁石内部に存在するマイ
クロクラックの有無は確認することができない。そのた
め磁石内部に存在するマイクロクラックが原因で、不良
を発生する場合がある。また、これらの方法によると、
検査後、磁石表面が薬剤で汚染され次工程での接着不良
が起こるため、完全なクリーニングが必要となる。In the penetration flaw detection test, the presence or absence of microcracks on the surface of the magnet can be confirmed, but the presence or absence of microcracks existing inside the magnet cannot be confirmed. Therefore, defects may occur due to the microcracks existing inside the magnet. Also, according to these methods,
After the inspection, the magnet surface is contaminated with chemicals, resulting in defective adhesion in the next step, so that complete cleaning is required.
【0005】上記のような問題点を解決するため、焼結
体のクラック等を打撃音で検出する方法が特開平3−9
2758号に開示されている。これは、焼結体表面を打
撃具にて打撃を与え、発生した打撃音をセンサで検出し
センサ出力を増幅、変換を行い、音響波形の減衰度を求
め、基準の減衰度と比較して欠陥の有無を判定する方法
である。In order to solve the above problems, there is a method of detecting cracks and the like in a sintered body with a hitting sound.
No. 2758. This is because the surface of the sintered body is hit with a hitting tool, the generated hitting sound is detected by a sensor, the sensor output is amplified and converted, the attenuation degree of the acoustic waveform is obtained, and compared with the reference attenuation degree. This is a method of determining the presence or absence of defects.
【0006】[0006]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、特開平3ー9
2758号に開示される方法では、焼結体をコンベヤ上
に固定して上方から打撃具で打撃を与えるため、打撃力
がコンベヤ面で規制・吸収され適正な打撃音が得られ
ず、欠陥の有無を判定することが困難である。したがっ
て、本発明の目的は焼結体を固定することなく、適正な
音響を得、その音響により、その良否を判別することの
できる音響選別方法を提供することである。本発明の他
の目的は、簡単な操作で、焼結体の共鳴音から、その良
否を判別することのできる音響選別装置を提供すること
である。However, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 3-9
In the method disclosed in No. 2758, since the sintered body is fixed on the conveyor and is hit with an impact tool from above, the impact force is regulated and absorbed by the conveyor surface, and an appropriate impact sound cannot be obtained. It is difficult to determine the presence or absence. Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a sound selection method capable of obtaining a proper sound without fixing a sintered body and determining whether the sound is good or bad by the sound. Another object of the present invention is to provide an acoustic selection device capable of discriminating its quality from the resonance sound of a sintered body by a simple operation.
【0007】[0007]
【課題を解決するための手段】第1の発明は、金属酸化
物の焼結体を共鳴台上に落下させ、得られる共鳴音か
ら、焼結体の良否を判別する音響選別方法である。第2
の発明は、被検査物を共鳴台上に落下させる落下手段
と、被検査物と共鳴台との共鳴音を検出する検出手段
と、検出手段の出力信号を音響波形に変換する変換手段
と、音の強度および音響波形の減衰度を求め、これらの
測定値を基準値と比較する演算手段と、被検査物の良
品、不良品を選別する選別手段とを有する音響選別装置
である。A first aspect of the present invention is an acoustic selection method in which a sintered body of a metal oxide is dropped on a resonance table, and the quality of the sintered body is determined from the resonance sound obtained. Second
In the invention, the drop means for dropping the inspection object on the resonance table, the detection means for detecting the resonance sound of the inspection object and the resonance table, and the conversion means for converting the output signal of the detection means into an acoustic waveform, It is an acoustic sorting device that has a computing unit that finds the sound intensity and the degree of attenuation of an acoustic waveform, and compares these measured values with a reference value, and a sorting unit that sorts non-defective and defective products of the inspection object.
【0008】本発明は、特にフェライト磁石の良否判別
に適している。フェライト磁石を落下させ共鳴音を発生
させる場合、50mm以下の高さから落下させることが
望ましい。50mmを越える高さから落下させるとフェ
ライト磁石が割れる恐れがある。The present invention is particularly suitable for determining the quality of a ferrite magnet. When the ferrite magnet is dropped to generate a resonance sound, it is desirable to drop it from a height of 50 mm or less. If the ferrite magnet is dropped from a height exceeding 50 mm, the ferrite magnet may crack.
【0009】また、フェライト磁石の形状は図2に示す
ようなアークセグメント形状のものが適しており、アー
ク角度θが80°以上であると、より大きな共鳴音が得
られ良否の判別を容易に行うことができる。また、アー
クセグメント形状のフェライト磁石の背部7aに落下衝
撃を与えると大きな共鳴音が得られる。したがって、ア
ーク角度が80゜以上であるアークセグメント形状のフ
ェライト磁石の背部に衝撃を与えるのが望ましい。また
中空円筒状のフェライト磁石でも大きな共鳴音が発生し
易く、音響選別を容易に行うことができる。Further, the shape of the ferrite magnet is preferably an arc segment shape as shown in FIG. 2. When the arc angle θ is 80 ° or more, a larger resonance sound can be obtained and the quality can be easily determined. It can be carried out. Further, when a fall impact is applied to the back portion 7a of the arc segment-shaped ferrite magnet, a large resonance sound is obtained. Therefore, it is desirable to impact the back of the arc segment shaped ferrite magnet with an arc angle of 80 ° or more. In addition, even a hollow cylindrical ferrite magnet is likely to generate a large resonance sound, and acoustic selection can be easily performed.
【0010】また、アークセグメント形状のフェライト
磁石を共鳴台に落下させるとき、点で当たると落下衝撃
で壊れ易いので背部が当たるよう落下させるのが望まし
い。Further, when a ferrite magnet in the shape of an arc segment is dropped on the resonance table, it is desirable to drop it so that its back part hits because it is easily broken by a drop impact if it hits at a point.
【0011】[0011]
【作用】本発明は焼結体を共鳴台上に落下させることに
より共鳴音を得るので、共鳴音発生時に焼結体を固定さ
れることなく共鳴音を得ることができる。そのため、固
定部材で共鳴音を吸収されることなく適正な音を得るこ
とができる。本発明は、フェライト磁石に落下衝撃を与
えて、その衝撃による共鳴音により良否を判別する方法
であるので、磁石表面を薬剤などで汚染されることもな
く、かつ短時間に判別することが可能である。また、共
鳴音により判別するので、マイクロクラックが磁石内部
に存在しても判別可能である。According to the present invention, since the resonance sound is obtained by dropping the sintered body on the resonance table, the resonance sound can be obtained without fixing the sintered body when the resonance sound is generated. Therefore, an appropriate sound can be obtained without the resonance sound being absorbed by the fixing member. INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is a method of applying a drop impact to a ferrite magnet and determining the quality based on the resonance sound caused by the impact, so that the surface of the magnet is not contaminated with a chemical or the like and can be determined in a short time. Is. Further, since the discrimination is performed by the resonance sound, it is possible to discriminate even if the microcracks exist inside the magnet.
【0012】[0012]
(実施例1)本発明の音響選別方法を用いたフェライト
磁石の音響選別装置の一実施例を示す断面図を図1に示
す。(Embodiment 1) FIG. 1 is a sectional view showing an embodiment of an acoustic sorting apparatus for ferrite magnets using the acoustic sorting method of the present invention.
【0013】図1において、1は図2に示すようなアー
クセグメント状の焼結体7を矢印A方向に搬送する供給
コンベヤーである。2は供給コンベヤー1上から上下稼
働することにより測定姿勢に焼結体の向きを替える回転
装置であり、設置台10上に設置される支柱3に取り付
けられている。4は、ステンレス鋼製の共鳴台6上に焼
結体を落下させる落下装置であり、焼結体を把持するた
めのハンド5を有し、シリンダー42に固設される。シ
リンダー42は、支柱3上に移動可能に装着されたアー
ム41上に支持され、左右(矢印X方向)に稼働する。
支柱3は、移動可能なアーム31を有し、上下(矢印Y
方向)に稼働する。シリンダー42、アーム42、支柱
3およびアーム31の相互稼働により、落下装置4は、
上下左右に稼働する。8は開閉可能な不良品排出シャッ
ターで、焼結体が良品の場合は稼働せず、不良品の場合
は開放されるように構成されている。9は良品を搬送す
る排出コンベヤーである。13は良品を格納するケース
である。In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 is a supply conveyor for conveying an arc segment-shaped sintered body 7 as shown in FIG. 2 in the direction of arrow A. Reference numeral 2 denotes a rotating device that moves up and down from above the supply conveyor 1 to change the direction of the sintered body to a measurement posture, and is attached to a column 3 installed on the installation table 10. Reference numeral 4 denotes a dropping device for dropping the sintered body on a stainless steel resonance table 6, which has a hand 5 for gripping the sintered body and is fixed to a cylinder 42. The cylinder 42 is supported on an arm 41 that is movably mounted on the support column 3 and operates left and right (direction of arrow X).
The column 3 has a movable arm 31 and is vertically (arrow Y).
Direction). Due to the mutual operation of the cylinder 42, the arm 42, the support column 3 and the arm 31, the drop device 4 is
Operates vertically and horizontally. Reference numeral 8 denotes a defective product discharge shutter that can be opened and closed, and does not operate when the sintered body is a good product, and is opened when it is a defective product. Reference numeral 9 is a discharge conveyor that conveys non-defective products. 13 is a case for storing non-defective products.
【0014】15は検出部であり、マイクロホン(図示
せず)により焼結体落下時の共鳴音を検出する。検出さ
れた共鳴音は増幅器16により適切な電圧値に増幅さ
れ、増幅された信号の強度を求め、振幅時間と、振幅面
積より減衰度を求め、予め記憶された良品の各基準値と
比較して、焼結体の良否を判定する処理を行う判定装置
17により判定される。良品の基準値は、官能検査方
法、破壊検査方法等との比較により求めることができ
る。Reference numeral 15 denotes a detection unit, which detects a resonance sound when the sintered body is dropped by a microphone (not shown). The detected resonance sound is amplified by the amplifier 16 to an appropriate voltage value, the strength of the amplified signal is calculated, the attenuation is calculated from the amplitude time and the amplitude area, and compared with each prestored reference value of a good product. Then, the judgment is performed by the judgment device 17 which performs processing for judging the quality of the sintered body. The reference value of a non-defective product can be obtained by comparison with a sensory inspection method, a destructive inspection method, or the like.
【0015】上記の構成において、焼結体7は供給コン
ベヤー1により搬送され、回転装置2により測定姿勢に
替えられる。ハンド5は、矢印Bで示すように支柱3側
に移動し、降下して焼結体をはさみ、次いで矢印Cで示
すように上昇して共鳴台6の上方に移動後、焼結体を共
鳴台6から20mmの高さから落下させる。落下時に発
生した共鳴台6と焼結体との共鳴音を検出器15に備え
たマイクロホンにより検出し、増幅器16により共鳴音
を増幅させて、その信号の強度と減衰度を基準値と比較
して、判定装置17により良否を判定する。判定後の焼
結体をスクレーパー(図示せず)にて排出し、それと同
時に不良排出シャッター8が不良であれば稼働する。一
方焼結体が良品であれば、不良排出シャッター8上を滑
り、排出コンベヤー9上に移動し、案内板12を経てケ
ース13内に移送される。In the above construction, the sintered body 7 is conveyed by the supply conveyor 1 and is changed to the measuring posture by the rotating device 2. The hand 5 moves to the column 3 side as shown by the arrow B, descends to sandwich the sintered body, and then ascends as shown by the arrow C to move above the resonance table 6 and then resonates the sintered body. The table 6 is dropped from a height of 20 mm. The resonance sound between the resonance table 6 and the sintered body generated at the time of dropping is detected by a microphone provided in the detector 15, the resonance sound is amplified by the amplifier 16, and the strength and attenuation of the signal are compared with the reference value. Then, the judging device 17 judges pass / fail. The sintered body after the determination is discharged by a scraper (not shown), and at the same time, if the defective discharge shutter 8 is defective, it operates. On the other hand, if the sintered body is a good product, it slides on the defective discharge shutter 8, moves onto the discharge conveyor 9, and is transferred into the case 13 via the guide plate 12.
【0016】(実験例1)アーク角度θ=145°、厚
さ5.5mmのアークセグメント形状のフェライト磁石
の共鳴音をオシロスコープで測定した結果を図3に示
す。図3(a)が良品で、図3(b)が不良品である
が、良品は振幅が大きく、長時間続く(減衰度が小さ
い)のに対し、不良品は振幅が小さく短時間しか続かな
い(減衰度が大きい)ことがわかる。(Experimental Example 1) FIG. 3 shows the result of measuring the resonance sound of an arc segment-shaped ferrite magnet having an arc angle θ = 145 ° and a thickness of 5.5 mm with an oscilloscope. 3A is a good product and FIG. 3B is a bad product. A good product has large amplitude and lasts for a long time (small attenuation), whereas a bad product has small amplitude and lasts only for a short time. It can be seen that there is no (high attenuation).
【0017】(実験例2)アーク角度θ=140°、厚
さ5.93mmのアークセグメント形状のフェライト磁
石の良否選別を行った。フェライト磁石を100個準備
し、カラーチェックによりフェライト磁石の良否判別を
行ったところ、3個不良が見つかった。良品であると判
別された残りの97個を図1に示す本発明のフェライト
磁石の音響選別装置を用いて、良否判別を行ったとこ
ろ、さらに2個の不良が見つかった。本発明のフェライ
ト磁石の音響選別方法により、さらに製品の信頼性を高
めることができる。(Experimental Example 2) A ferrite magnet having an arc angle θ of 140 ° and an arc segment shape with a thickness of 5.93 mm was selected. When 100 ferrite magnets were prepared and the quality of the ferrite magnets was determined by color check, 3 defects were found. The remaining 97 discriminated as non-defective products were subjected to a pass / fail determination using the ferrite magnet acoustic sorting apparatus of the present invention shown in FIG. 1, and two more defects were found. The reliability of products can be further improved by the acoustic selection method for ferrite magnets of the present invention.
【0018】[0018]
【発明の効果】本発明のフェライト磁石の音響選別方法
および音響選別装置により、焼結体の正確な良否判別が
可能である。According to the acoustic selection method and the acoustic selection device for a ferrite magnet of the present invention, it is possible to accurately determine the quality of a sintered body.
【図1】本発明音響判別装置の概略図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an acoustic discrimination device of the present invention.
【図2】本発明の対象とするフェライト磁石の一例を示
す斜視図である。FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing an example of a ferrite magnet to which the present invention is applied.
【図3】(a)クラックのないフェライト磁石と共鳴台
の共鳴音を表した波形を示す図である。 (b)クラックのあるフェライト磁石と共鳴台の共鳴音
を表した波形を示す図である。FIG. 3A is a diagram showing a waveform representing a resonance sound of a ferrite magnet without a crack and a resonance table. (B) It is a figure which shows the waveform showing the resonance sound of the ferrite magnet with a crack, and a resonance stand.
1 供給コンベヤー、 2 回転装置、 3 支柱、
4 落下装置、5 ハンド、 6 共鳴台、 8 不良
排出シャッター、9 排出コンベヤー 15 検出部、 16 増幅器、 17 判定装置1 supply conveyor, 2 rotating devices, 3 columns,
4 drop device, 5 hands, 6 resonance table, 8 defective discharge shutter, 9 discharge conveyor 15 detector, 16 amplifier, 17 determination device
Claims (2)
せ、得られる共鳴音から、焼結体の良否を判別すること
を特徴とする音響選別方法。1. An acoustic selection method, wherein a sintered body of a metal oxide is dropped on a resonance table, and the quality of the sintered body is determined from the resonance sound obtained.
段と、被検査物と共鳴台との共鳴音を検出する検出手段
と、検出手段の出力信号を音響波形に変換する変換手段
と、音の強度および音響波形の減衰度を求め、これらの
測定値を基準値と比較する判定手段と、被検査物の良
品、不良品を選別する選別手段とを有することを特徴と
する音響選別装置。2. Drop means for dropping the inspection object on the resonance table, detection means for detecting resonance sound between the inspection object and the resonance table, and conversion means for converting an output signal of the detection means into an acoustic waveform. , Sound intensity and attenuation of acoustic waveform, and a determination means for comparing these measured values with a reference value, and a selection means for selecting a non-defective product and a defective product of the inspected product apparatus.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP5279471A JPH07134118A (en) | 1993-11-09 | 1993-11-09 | Method and apparatus for sorting sound |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP5279471A JPH07134118A (en) | 1993-11-09 | 1993-11-09 | Method and apparatus for sorting sound |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH07134118A true JPH07134118A (en) | 1995-05-23 |
Family
ID=17611526
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP5279471A Pending JPH07134118A (en) | 1993-11-09 | 1993-11-09 | Method and apparatus for sorting sound |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH07134118A (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2003329655A (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2003-11-19 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Damage inspection device |
JP2006250757A (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-21 | Tdk Corp | Inspection method and inspection device |
JP2006250758A (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-21 | Tdk Corp | Inspection method and inspection device |
JP2006266694A (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-10-05 | Tdk Corp | Inspection method and inspection device |
JP2013153652A (en) * | 2013-05-16 | 2013-08-08 | Mitsui High Tec Inc | Manufacturing method and manufacturing apparatus of rotor core |
JP2016085089A (en) * | 2014-10-24 | 2016-05-19 | 株式会社ネクスコ東日本エンジニアリング | Inspection support device, inspection support method, inspection support program and inspection support system |
-
1993
- 1993-11-09 JP JP5279471A patent/JPH07134118A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2003329655A (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2003-11-19 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Damage inspection device |
JP2006250757A (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-21 | Tdk Corp | Inspection method and inspection device |
JP2006250758A (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-21 | Tdk Corp | Inspection method and inspection device |
JP2006266694A (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-10-05 | Tdk Corp | Inspection method and inspection device |
JP2013153652A (en) * | 2013-05-16 | 2013-08-08 | Mitsui High Tec Inc | Manufacturing method and manufacturing apparatus of rotor core |
JP2016085089A (en) * | 2014-10-24 | 2016-05-19 | 株式会社ネクスコ東日本エンジニアリング | Inspection support device, inspection support method, inspection support program and inspection support system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5214960A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting defects in an object by vibrating the object in a plurality of positions | |
CA1201525A (en) | Test system for defect determination in welding seams | |
JPH03289561A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting defect and part of different hardness | |
JPH07134118A (en) | Method and apparatus for sorting sound | |
JPH0392758A (en) | Product inspection | |
JPS6358124A (en) | Impact type structural change detector | |
US4567764A (en) | Detection of clad disbond | |
Aboali et al. | Screening for welding defects using acoustic emission technique | |
JPH063305A (en) | Method for non-destructively inspecting piezo-electric element for micro-crack | |
CN101609067A (en) | A kind of internal defects of refractory brick nondestructive quantitative detecting method and device | |
JP4005880B2 (en) | Quality inspection equipment | |
RU2210766C1 (en) | Procedure to conduct acoustic emission test with use of single-channel equipment | |
JPH04320958A (en) | Method for inspecting product acoustically | |
JPH03199960A (en) | Crack detecting method | |
JPH03120458A (en) | Method and device for detecting defect | |
KR100497501B1 (en) | Detection Method for Defect of piston gallery and The apparatus used thereto | |
JP2004230325A (en) | Golf ball sorting method and apparatus | |
JPH0356851A (en) | Cracking detecting method | |
CN108169323A (en) | A kind of processing method of polymorphic structure workpiece eddy current signal | |
KR100820304B1 (en) | Used Process and Defect Detection Equipment to Peeled bar used Nondestructive Inspection Equipment | |
EP1464958A2 (en) | Method and equipment for the automatic inspection of flat materials (sheets) | |
JP2003329655A (en) | Damage inspection device | |
JPH03146843A (en) | Impact fracture test method for electronic parts | |
Liber et al. | Ultrasonic techniques for inspecting flat and cylindrical composite specimens | |
JPH075155A (en) | Ultrasonic method for deciding type of flaw automatically |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees | ||
S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |