JPH0712759A - Quality judgement method for cast component - Google Patents

Quality judgement method for cast component

Info

Publication number
JPH0712759A
JPH0712759A JP5150471A JP15047193A JPH0712759A JP H0712759 A JPH0712759 A JP H0712759A JP 5150471 A JP5150471 A JP 5150471A JP 15047193 A JP15047193 A JP 15047193A JP H0712759 A JPH0712759 A JP H0712759A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
cast
ray
density
value
cast component
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP5150471A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hisao Hirono
久雄 広野
Mitsuaki Ueno
光明 上野
Shigetoshi Ito
重利 伊藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honda Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP5150471A priority Critical patent/JPH0712759A/en
Publication of JPH0712759A publication Critical patent/JPH0712759A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To make efficient and precise judgement by reproducing the tomography of a cast component by an X-ray CT and then confirming a cast defect such as a shrinkage cavity, segregation and a machined condition. CONSTITUTION:An X-ray CT scanner system emits to a cast component an X-ray collimated to the thickness of the cross section thereof from each direction to detect a cast condition via a multi-channel sensor, and the data collecting section of the system collects projection data. The collected data undergoes a data correction and image processing in a high-speed arithmetic device, thereby being reconstituted. The beam absorption factor of each picture element constituting the cross section changes in proportion to the density of a substance and, therefore, the factor is converted to a CT value proportional to density. The CT value so obtained is shown on a CRT after brilliance modulation.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、例えば鋳造欠陥防止の
ため部分加圧しながら鋳造した鋳造部品の鋳造品質を効
率良く確認し得る品質判定方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a quality judging method capable of efficiently confirming the casting quality of a cast part that is cast while partially pressurizing to prevent casting defects.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、例えば鋳造品の引け巣等の鋳造欠
陥を防止するため、キャビティ内の溶湯を加圧ピンによ
って部分加圧しながら鋳造することがある。このような
場合、鋳造品に引け巣等の鋳造欠陥が発生していない
か、又は加圧ピンによる部分加圧の効果が全域にまで有
効に及んでいるか、或いは溶融合金の鋳造であれば特定
成分が部分的に偏って凝固していないか等の鋳造品質の
確認にあたり、従来では必要に応じ破壊検査を行って判
定している。すなわち、例えば引け巣等の鋳造欠陥はX
線透過による非破壊検査によって確認出来るが、加圧状
態、偏析については非破壊検査では確認出来ないため、
例えば被検査物をサイコロ状に切断して秤量し、ボリュ
ーム当りの密度を測定することで加圧状態の確認を行っ
たり、切断表面を研磨して組織を検査して偏析を確認す
る等の破壊検査を採用している。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in order to prevent a casting defect such as a shrinkage cavity of a cast product, the molten metal in the cavity is sometimes partially pressurized by a pressure pin. In such a case, whether the casting defect such as shrinkage cavity has not occurred in the cast product, or the effect of partial pressurization by the pressurizing pin is effective to the entire area, or if casting of molten alloy is specified In order to confirm the casting quality such as whether the components are partially biased and solidified, conventionally, a fracture inspection is performed as necessary to make a determination. That is, casting defects such as shrinkage cavities are X
It can be confirmed by non-destructive inspection by line transmission, but since the pressurized state and segregation cannot be confirmed by non-destructive inspection,
For example, the inspection object is cut into dice, weighed, and the density per volume is measured to check the pressure state, or the cut surface is polished to inspect the structure to confirm segregation, etc. The inspection is adopted.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記の
ようなX線透過による引け巣等の内部欠陥の確認は、欠
陥の形状とX線照射方向との関係によっては発見が困難
な場合があるという問題があった。又、被検査物をサイ
コロ状に切断するような破壊検査は、時間と手間がかか
って効率的でないという問題に加え、切断する場合の切
断精度、形状等にも制約が多く、このためより効率的な
判定手段が望まれていた。
However, it may be difficult to find internal defects such as shrinkage cavities due to X-ray transmission as described above, depending on the relationship between the defect shape and the X-ray irradiation direction. There was a problem. In addition to the problem that destructive inspection such as cutting the inspection object into dice takes time and labor, it is not efficient, and there are many restrictions on the cutting accuracy and shape when cutting, which makes it more efficient. There has been a demand for an effective determination means.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】かかる課題を解決するた
め、本発明は鋳造部品の断層像をX線CT(コンピュー
ティッドトモグラフィ)により再生し、非破壊検査によ
って引け巣等の鋳造欠陥のみならず、偏析、加圧状態も
確認するようにした。
In order to solve such a problem, the present invention reproduces a tomographic image of a cast part by X-ray CT (Computed Tomography), and only non-destructive inspection shows only casting defects such as shrinkage cavities. Instead, the segregation and the pressurized state were also checked.

【0005】[0005]

【作用】CTスキャンによって得られたCT値を画像処
理し再生すれば、引け巣等の状態、加圧状態、偏析状態
が断層像から判定出来る。従って、従来のように破壊検
査に頼らず全てが効率的に判定出来、又、引け巣等の内
部欠陥についても、従来のようなX線透過に較べて欠陥
の形状に左右されない。しかも複雑な形状の鋳造品でも
精度良く判定出来る。
If the CT value obtained by the CT scan is image-processed and reproduced, the state such as shrinkage cavity, the pressure state, and the segregation state can be determined from the tomographic image. Therefore, all can be efficiently judged without relying on the destructive inspection as in the prior art, and internal defects such as shrinkage cavities are not affected by the shape of the defect as compared with the conventional X-ray transmission. Moreover, it is possible to accurately determine even a cast product having a complicated shape.

【0006】[0006]

【実施例】本発明の鋳造部品の品質判定方法の実施例に
ついて添付した図面に基づき説明する。図1は加圧状態
の変化に伴う断層像のテスト結果の模式図を示し、図2
は同テストの実験要領の説明図である。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of a quality judgment method for cast parts according to the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a test result of a tomographic image according to a change in a pressurization state.
Is an explanatory diagram of an experimental procedure of the test.

【0007】一般に鋳造は形状付与性が大きく、適用し
得る金属や合金の幅が広く、且つ大量生産も可能である
等の利点を有する反面、金属の体積変化に起因する引け
巣、割れ等の鋳造欠陥の他、溶湯にガスを吸収すること
に伴うブローホール、ガスホールとか、溶融合金の凝固
組織が部分的に不均一になる偏析等の問題を有してい
る。
[0007] Generally, casting has a large shape-imparting property and has a wide range of applicable metals and alloys, and mass production is possible, but on the other hand, shrinkage cavities, cracks, etc. due to the volume change of the metal In addition to casting defects, there are problems such as blowholes and gas holes due to absorption of gas in the molten metal, and segregation in which the solidification structure of the molten alloy becomes partially nonuniform.

【0008】そこで、特に引け巣とかブローホール等の
鋳造欠陥を防止するため、従来からキャビティ内に溶湯
を注湯した後、鋳造欠陥を生じやすい箇所等に加圧ピン
を圧入して部分的に二次加圧するような方式が広く採用
されており、このような加圧ピンは、例えば製品形状部
に近い非製品形状部に設けられることが多い。
Therefore, in order to prevent casting defects such as shrinkage cavities and blow holes, a molten metal is conventionally poured into the cavity, and then a pressure pin is press-fitted into a portion where casting defects are likely to occur. A method of applying secondary pressure is widely adopted, and such a pressure pin is often provided, for example, in a non-product shape portion close to the product shape portion.

【0009】そこで、このような部分的加圧によって鋳
造された鋳造品の品質は、特に加圧効果の範囲の確認と
か、偏析状態については、従来では前記のように破壊検
査に頼らざるを得なかった訳であるが、本案はX線CT
によって極めて効率的に判定出来るようにしたものであ
る。
Therefore, the quality of the cast product cast by such partial pressurization has to rely on the destructive inspection as described above in the past for checking the range of the pressurizing effect and for the segregation state. Although it was not translated, this proposal is X-ray CT
This makes it possible to make extremely efficient determinations.

【0010】そして、かかるX線CTスキャナシステム
は一般的なものであり、例えば断面の厚さ(スライス
幅)にコリメートされたX線を鋳造品の各方向から放射
して多チャンネルセンサで検出し、データ収集部で投影
データを収集する。そして、この投影データを高速演算
装置でデータ補正、画像処理して再構成する。
Such an X-ray CT scanner system is a general system, and, for example, X-rays collimated to the thickness (slice width) of the cross section are radiated from each direction of the cast product and detected by a multi-channel sensor. The projection data is collected by the data collection unit. Then, this projection data is reconstructed by data correction and image processing by a high-speed arithmetic device.

【0011】この際、断面を構成する各画素の線吸収係
数μが求められるが、この線吸収係数μは、物質の密度
ρ(g/cm3)に比例してμ=μ0・ρで示され(μ0
質量吸収係数)、更に、この線吸収係数μは密度ρに比
例するCT値に変換され、このCT値を輝度変調してC
RT上に表示する。
At this time, the linear absorption coefficient μ of each pixel forming the cross section is obtained. This linear absorption coefficient μ is proportional to the density ρ (g / cm 3 ) of the substance, and μ = μ 0 · ρ (Μ 0 is a mass absorption coefficient), and this linear absorption coefficient μ is converted into a CT value proportional to the density ρ.
Display on RT.

【0012】そこで、このCRTに表示されるCT値分
布の具体例について説明する。
Therefore, a specific example of the CT value distribution displayed on the CRT will be described.

【0013】図2(A)に示すように、キャビティ内に
注湯した例えばアルミ合金等の溶湯1に加圧ピン2を圧
入して溶湯1を加圧する場合を考えると、加圧ピン2の
加圧ストロークsが大きくなるに連れて溶湯1内の圧力
が高まる。
As shown in FIG. 2 (A), considering the case where the pressure pin 2 is pressed into the molten metal 1 such as aluminum alloy poured into the cavity to pressurize the molten metal 1, the pressure pin 2 The pressure in the molten metal 1 increases as the pressurization stroke s increases.

【0014】そして、この加圧ストロークsを、図2
(B)に示すように、4種類に分けて夫々テストした結
果が図1に示すCT値(密度)分布図である。つまり、
Aの加圧ストロークsは0.1mm、Bの加圧ストローク
sは3.5mm、Cの加圧ストロークsは6.7mm、Dの
加圧ストロークsは10.4mmである。
The pressure stroke s is shown in FIG.
As shown in (B), the CT value (density) distribution chart shown in FIG. 1 is the result of testing each of four types. That is,
The pressure stroke s of A is 0.1 mm, the pressure stroke s of B is 3.5 mm, the pressure stroke s of C is 6.7 mm, and the pressure stroke s of D is 10.4 mm.

【0015】そして、図1のAの状態では加圧ストロー
クsは小さく、CT値(密度)分布にはレベル4、5で
表わされる鋳巣領域が広い範囲に表れている。尚、レベ
ル5はCT値(×4)が286以下であり、密度ρは基
準密度2.81から−25%以上低下していることを示
し、レベル4はCT値(×4)が324〜286の範囲
で、密度ρは基準から−15%〜−25%低下している
ことを示す。又、レベル3はCT値(×4)が362〜
324の範囲で、密度ρは基準に対して−5%〜−15
%の範囲にあることを示し、レベル2はCT値(×4)
が400〜362の範囲で、密度ρは基準に対して+5
%〜−5%の範囲にあることを示す。そして、レベル1
はCT値(×4)が438〜400の範囲で、密度ρは
基準に対して+15%〜+5%の範囲にあることを示
す。
In the state of FIG. 1A, the pressing stroke s is small, and the CT value (density) distribution shows a wide range of cavities regions represented by levels 4 and 5. The level 5 shows that the CT value (× 4) is 286 or less, the density ρ is decreased by -25% or more from the reference density 2.81, and the level 4 shows that the CT value (× 4) is 324 to In the range of 286, the density ρ is decreased by -15% to -25% from the standard. Also, the CT value (x4) of level 3 is 362 to 362.
In the range of 324, the density ρ is −5% to −15 with respect to the standard.
%, CT value (× 4)
In the range of 400 to 362, the density ρ is +5 with respect to the reference.
% To −5%. And level 1
Indicates that the CT value (× 4) is in the range of 438 to 400, and the density ρ is in the range of + 15% to + 5% with respect to the reference.

【0016】次にBの状態で加圧ストロークsが増加す
ると、レベル4、5の鋳巣領域は減少し、その代りに加
圧力が及ぶ範囲が広がっていることが判る。
Next, when the pressurization stroke s increases in the state of B, it is understood that the porosity regions of levels 4 and 5 decrease and the range of the applied pressure expands instead.

【0017】そして、C、Dの状態のように更に加圧ス
トロークsが増すと、レベル2程度の領域が更に拡が
り、鋳巣領域は一層減少する。又、Dの状態で表わされ
るレベル1の部分は、例えば密度ρが基準密度を10%
以上も越える偏析状態を含むものであり、このCT値に
よって偏析状態も検知出来る。
When the pressure stroke s is further increased as in the states C and D, the area of level 2 is further expanded and the porosity area is further decreased. In the level 1 portion represented by the state of D, for example, the density ρ is 10% of the reference density.
The segregation state exceeding the above is included, and the segregation state can be detected by this CT value.

【0018】そして、以上のようなCT値(密度)を表
示することによって引け巣等の鋳造欠陥、加圧状態、偏
析が即座に判断出来、従来のような破壊検査を行う必要
がない。
By displaying the CT value (density) as described above, casting defects such as shrinkage cavities, pressurization state, and segregation can be immediately judged, and it is not necessary to carry out a destructive inspection as in the prior art.

【0019】[0019]

【発明の効果】以上のように本発明の鋳造部品の品質判
定方法は、鋳造品の引け巣等の内部欠陥、加圧状態、偏
析を確認するにあたり、X線CTによって被検査物を破
壊することなく検査出来るようにしたため、極めて効率
的に且つ精密に判定することが可能となった。
As described above, according to the method for determining the quality of a cast part of the present invention, when confirming internal defects such as shrinkage cavities of a cast product, a pressurizing state, and segregation, the object to be inspected is destroyed by X-ray CT. Since the inspection can be performed without any need, it has become possible to make an extremely efficient and precise determination.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】加圧状態に伴う断層像のテスト結果の模式図FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a test result of a tomographic image according to a pressurized state.

【図2】同テストの実験要領の説明図[Fig. 2] Illustration of the experimental procedure of the test

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 溶湯 2 加圧ピン 1 molten metal 2 pressure pin

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 鋳造部品の断層像をX線CTにより再生
し、引け巣等の鋳造欠陥、及び偏析、加圧状態を確認す
ることを特徴とする鋳造部品の品質判定方法。
1. A method for determining the quality of a cast part, which comprises reconstructing a tomographic image of the cast part by X-ray CT to check for casting defects such as shrinkage cavities, segregation, and pressure.
JP5150471A 1993-06-22 1993-06-22 Quality judgement method for cast component Withdrawn JPH0712759A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP5150471A JPH0712759A (en) 1993-06-22 1993-06-22 Quality judgement method for cast component

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP5150471A JPH0712759A (en) 1993-06-22 1993-06-22 Quality judgement method for cast component

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0712759A true JPH0712759A (en) 1995-01-17

Family

ID=15497637

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP5150471A Withdrawn JPH0712759A (en) 1993-06-22 1993-06-22 Quality judgement method for cast component

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0712759A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002503816A (en) * 1998-02-11 2002-02-05 アナロジック コーポレーション Computer tomography apparatus and method for classifying objects
JP2003004665A (en) * 2001-06-20 2003-01-08 Asahi Tec Corp Inspection method for cast and forged product
JP2006125960A (en) * 2004-10-28 2006-05-18 Hitachi Ltd Internal flaw inspection method and internal flaw inspection device
JP2006329917A (en) * 2005-05-30 2006-12-07 Hitachi Ltd Internal defect inspection method and internal defect inspection device
JP2018179950A (en) * 2017-04-21 2018-11-15 日本精工株式会社 Method for evaluating nest
CN109655491A (en) * 2019-01-15 2019-04-19 安徽奥特佳科技发展有限公司 A kind of aluminum alloy die casting stomata and shrinkage cavity defect overall quality detection method
CN117741090A (en) * 2024-02-19 2024-03-22 如皋市力霸铸造有限公司 Quality defect detection method for precision casting of gearbox
CN117741090B (en) * 2024-02-19 2024-04-26 如皋市力霸铸造有限公司 Quality defect detection method for precision casting of gearbox

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002503816A (en) * 1998-02-11 2002-02-05 アナロジック コーポレーション Computer tomography apparatus and method for classifying objects
JP2003004665A (en) * 2001-06-20 2003-01-08 Asahi Tec Corp Inspection method for cast and forged product
JP2006125960A (en) * 2004-10-28 2006-05-18 Hitachi Ltd Internal flaw inspection method and internal flaw inspection device
JP4588414B2 (en) * 2004-10-28 2010-12-01 株式会社日立製作所 Internal defect inspection method and apparatus
US7933441B2 (en) 2004-10-28 2011-04-26 Hitachi, Ltd. Method of inspection for inner defects of an object and apparatus for same
JP2006329917A (en) * 2005-05-30 2006-12-07 Hitachi Ltd Internal defect inspection method and internal defect inspection device
JP4523489B2 (en) * 2005-05-30 2010-08-11 株式会社日立製作所 Internal defect inspection method and internal defect inspection apparatus
JP2018179950A (en) * 2017-04-21 2018-11-15 日本精工株式会社 Method for evaluating nest
CN109655491A (en) * 2019-01-15 2019-04-19 安徽奥特佳科技发展有限公司 A kind of aluminum alloy die casting stomata and shrinkage cavity defect overall quality detection method
CN117741090A (en) * 2024-02-19 2024-03-22 如皋市力霸铸造有限公司 Quality defect detection method for precision casting of gearbox
CN117741090B (en) * 2024-02-19 2024-04-26 如皋市力霸铸造有限公司 Quality defect detection method for precision casting of gearbox

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4588414B2 (en) Internal defect inspection method and apparatus
JP2012514193A (en) Non-destructive inspection method for machine parts
JPH0288951A (en) Method of regenerating computer type tomographic imge
US7860297B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting the deformation of objects
JP4523489B2 (en) Internal defect inspection method and internal defect inspection apparatus
JPH0712759A (en) Quality judgement method for cast component
WO2016139756A1 (en) Measurement processing device, x-ray inspection device, measurement processing method, measurement processing program, and structure manufacturing method
Lampman et al. Nondestructive testing in failure analysis
JP2005091288A (en) Discrimination method for casting defect
US20020095267A1 (en) Method for the non-destructive inspection of wall strength
JP2006189349A (en) Nondestructive defect inspection system
JP4211704B2 (en) Cast hole measurement method
JP3132385B2 (en) Inspection position determination method for metal weld section
JP6988705B2 (en) Non-destructive inspection method for slab bubble defects
Bossi et al. X-ray computed tomographic inspection of castings
CN113129259A (en) Casting blank density detection method and system and electronic equipment
US8831172B2 (en) Method for filmless radiographic inspection of components
du Plessis et al. Nondestructive micro-CT inspection of additive parts: how to beat the bottlenecks
JP5849601B2 (en) Defect detection method for aluminum die cast parts
Ambos et al. Porosity and Dimensional 3D Process Control–Fast Computed Tomography in High Pressure Die Casting
Georgeson et al. X-Ray Computed Tomography of Full-Scale Castings
JPS6275775A (en) Picture processor
Dasch et al. Quantitative X-ray Tomography for the development of a piston casting process
JPH0317091B2 (en)
Wang et al. Porosity Characterization of Cast Al Alloys with X-Ray Computed Tomography andScanning Electron Microscope

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 20000905