JPH06162037A - Plan forming system for production planning - Google Patents
Plan forming system for production planningInfo
- Publication number
- JPH06162037A JPH06162037A JP31816492A JP31816492A JPH06162037A JP H06162037 A JPH06162037 A JP H06162037A JP 31816492 A JP31816492 A JP 31816492A JP 31816492 A JP31816492 A JP 31816492A JP H06162037 A JPH06162037 A JP H06162037A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- product
- production
- rule
- evaluation
- rules
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 120
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 82
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002194 synthesizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- FFBHFFJDDLITSX-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzyl N-[2-hydroxy-4-(3-oxomorpholin-4-yl)phenyl]carbamate Chemical compound OC1=C(NC(=O)OCC2=CC=CC=C2)C=CC(=C1)N1CCOCC1=O FFBHFFJDDLITSX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Multi-Process Working Machines And Systems (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、生産物を生産単位毎に
生産装置の工程管理図の時間軸に割り付ける生産計画の
立案方式に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method of drafting a production plan for allocating a product for each production unit to a time axis of a process control chart of a production apparatus.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】生産物を生産装置に割り付ける方法とし
ては、ディスパッチングル−ルを用いた確定的ディスパ
ッチング法(「スケジュ−リングの理論」p173-p177
日刊工業新聞社刊 関根監訳)が知られている。確定的
ディスパッチング法は、全ての生産物を割り付ける際、
常に一定のル−ル(図7−1)を適用する。図7−3
に確定的ディスパッチング法による生産計画の立案例を
示す。2. Description of the Related Art As a method for allocating a product to a production device, a deterministic dispatching method using a dispatching rule ("Scheduling theory" p173-p177) is used.
The Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun (published by Sekine) is known. The deterministic dispatching method, when allocating all products,
Always apply a constant rule (Fig. 7-1). Figure 7-3
Figure 2 shows an example of production planning by the deterministic dispatching method.
【0003】図7−2のA、B、Cの各生産物を生産装
置に割り付ける場合には、例えば、納期余裕の最も少な
いものを選ぶといったル−ル1により割り付けを行う
と、納期余裕はそれぞれ3日、4日、6日なので、生産
物の生産順序は納期余裕の少ない順に、A→B→Cと生
産される。When the products A, B and C shown in FIG. 7-2 are allocated to the production apparatus, for example, if the allocation is performed by the rule 1 such that the product with the smallest delivery deadline is selected, the delivery deadline is reduced. Since they are 3 days, 4 days, and 6 days, respectively, the production order of the products is A → B → C in the ascending order of delivery time.
【0004】作業時間の最も小さいものを選ぶといった
ル−ル2により割り付けを行うと、作業時間はそれぞれ
1時間、5時間、3時間なので、生産物はA→C→Bの
順で生産される。When the allocation is performed by the rule 2 such that the one having the smallest work time is selected, the work time is 1 hour, 5 hours and 3 hours, respectively, so that the products are produced in the order of A → C → B. .
【0005】残りの作業量の最も大きいものを選ぶとい
ったル−ル3により割り付けを行うと、残作業量は生産
量に比例するので、生産量はそれぞれ50K個、10K
個、150K個であることから、生産物は生産量の少な
い順に、C→B→Aの順に生産される。When the allocation is made by the rule 3 such that the one having the largest remaining work amount is selected, the remaining work amount is proportional to the production amount, so that the production amounts are 50K and 10K, respectively.
Since the number of products is 150K, the products are produced in the order of increasing production amount, C → B → A.
【0006】以上の様に、確定的ディスパッチング法に
よる計画立案は、割り付けるル−ルに依存した計画立案
である。しかし、実際はスケジュ−リングする期間は数
か月程度等、長い期間である為、その間、生産の効率等
の生産装置の状態及び納期余裕等の生産物の状態が変化
することにより、計画立案が適切でなくなる場合が生じ
ることがある。As described above, the planning by the deterministic dispatching method is a planning which depends on the rule to be assigned. However, in reality, the scheduling period is a long period, such as several months, so during that period, the plan can be drafted due to changes in the production equipment state such as production efficiency and the product state such as the delivery deadline. Occasionally it may not be appropriate.
【0007】上記の問題を解決するため、ディスパッチ
ングル−ルを確率的に用いる確率的ディスパッチング法
(「スケジュ−リングの理論」p180-p186 日刊工業
新聞社刊 関根監訳)が研究されている。In order to solve the above problem, a probabilistic dispatching method ("Theory of scheduling" p180-p186 translated by Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, translated by Sekine) using a dispatching rule is studied.
【0008】確率的ディスパッチング法では、1つの計
画を立案する際に生産単位ごとに適用するル−ルを時々
ランダムに別のル−ルに切り替えてスケジュ−リングを
行ない、この様な計画を幾つか立案し、その中から最も
適切な計画を選択する方法である。In the stochastic dispatching method, the rule applied to each production unit when one plan is drafted is sometimes randomly switched to another rule to perform scheduling. It is a method of making several plans and selecting the most appropriate plan from them.
【0009】[0009]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】従来使用されている確
定的ディスパッチング法では、全ての生産物を割り付け
る間、常に一定のル−ルを適用するため、適用するル−
ルによって、立案されるスケジュ−ルは大幅に相違して
おり、最良解の出現頻度は適用するル−ルに依存してい
る。そのため、不適切な立案が行われる場合がある。In the deterministic dispatching method used in the past, a fixed rule is always applied during the allocation of all products.
Depending on the rule, the schedules to be planned differ greatly, and the frequency of occurrence of the best solution depends on the rule applied. Therefore, improper planning may occur.
【0010】この問題を解決するために考案された方法
が確率的ディスパッチング法である。しかし、この方法
では必ず幾つかの計画を立案し、その中から最も適切な
計画を選ぶために、複数の代替案の作成に時間がかかる
という問題が生じる。また、時々ル−ルを変更してスケ
ジュ−リングを行なうことにより、確定的ディスパッチ
ング法に比べ平均的に最良解の出現頻度は多くなるが、
ル−ルを時々切替る作業は、ランダムに行なう為、依然
として最良解の出現頻度は適用するル−ルに依存してし
まうという問題がある。A method devised to solve this problem is the stochastic dispatching method. However, this method has a problem that it takes time to create a plurality of alternatives in order to always make several plans and select the most appropriate plan from them. Also, by changing the rule from time to time and performing scheduling, the frequency of appearance of the best solution increases on average as compared with the deterministic dispatching method,
Since the work of switching the rules from time to time is performed randomly, there still remains a problem that the frequency of appearance of the best solution depends on the rule to be applied.
【0011】本発明の目的は、各生産物に対して均等に
最良解を得ると共に、複数の代替案作成を不要とするこ
とにより、短時間で最良の生産計画の立案を行なうこと
にある。It is an object of the present invention to uniformly obtain the best solution for each product and to make the best production plan in a short time by eliminating the need for preparing a plurality of alternatives.
【0012】また、本発明の目的は、生産装置及び生産
物の複数種類の状態量をランク付けし、ランク付けられ
た状態量のランクに基づいて、ディスパッチングル−ル
の1種等の異なった蓄積されたル−ルから割り付けル−
ルを選択し、選択されたル−ルを基に評価量(生産物の
評価の対象となる納期余裕日数、残作業量、作業時間等
の値)の算出を行ない、その評価量を基に、各生産物に
対し割り付けの優先度を示す評価点の算出式を用いて、
評価点の算出を行ない、その評価結果により、生産物の
割り付け順序を決定する(評価点の高い順に割り付け
る)ことにより、さらに最良解の多い生産計画を立案す
ることにある。Another object of the present invention is to rank a plurality of kinds of state quantities of a production apparatus and a product, and to distinguish one kind of dispatching rule based on the rank of the ranked state quantities. Allocation rule from accumulated rules
Select a rule and calculate the evaluation amount (values of spare days for delivery, remaining work amount, work time, etc. to be evaluated for the product) based on the selected rule, and based on the evaluation amount , Using the calculation formula of the evaluation point that shows the priority of allocation for each product,
The purpose is to calculate the evaluation points and determine the allocation order of the products based on the evaluation results (allocate in descending order of evaluation points) to formulate a production plan with more optimal solutions.
【0013】[0013]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は要するに生産物
及び生産装置の状態量を算出し、その算出結果に基づい
て、適用するディスパッチングル−ルを選択し、そのル
−ルを基に評価量を算出し、算出した評価量を基に割り
付けの優先度を示す評価点を算出し、その評価点に基づ
いて生産物の割り付けを行うものである。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In short, the present invention calculates the state quantities of a product and a production apparatus, selects a dispatching rule to be applied based on the calculation result, and evaluates based on the rule. The amount is calculated, an evaluation point indicating the priority of allocation is calculated based on the calculated evaluation amount, and the products are allocated based on the evaluation point.
【0014】即ち、本発明は、生産計画を立案するシス
テムにおいて、生産装置と生産物の複数種類の状態量を
算出する手段と、それらの状態量をランク付けする手段
と、前記ランクを用いて、蓄積手段に蓄積されたル−ル
から割り付けル−ルを選択する手段と、前記選択された
ル−ルに基づき、生産物の評価の対象となる納期余裕日
数、残作業量、作業時間等の値である評価量を算出する
手段と、前記算出された評価量に基づいて、評価点の算
出を行う手段と、前記算出手段により算出された評価点
に基づき、最も評価点の高い生産物を生産装置の工程管
理図の時間軸に割り付ける手段からなる。That is, according to the present invention, in a system for formulating a production plan, means for calculating a plurality of types of state quantities of a production apparatus and a product, means for ranking those state quantities, and the rank are used. A means for selecting an allocation rule from the rules accumulated in the accumulating means, and a delivery time allowance, a remaining work amount, a working time, etc. which are objects of evaluation of the product, based on the selected rule. Means for calculating an evaluation amount that is the value of, a means for calculating an evaluation point based on the calculated evaluation amount, and a product having the highest evaluation point based on the evaluation point calculated by the calculating means Is assigned to the time axis of the process control chart of the production apparatus.
【0015】[0015]
【作用】上記生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量の
算出手段は、入力された生産装置の1日当たりの生産量
等の生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量を算出する
ための情報を基に、各計算式を用いて算出するものであ
り、上記ランク付け手段は、算出された生産物及び生産
装置の状態量をその量によりランク付けする手段であ
り、上記ル−ル選択手段は、蓄積手段に蓄積されたディ
スパッチングル−ルの1種であるル−ル2、ル−ル1等
のル−ルから生産物及び生産装置の状態量の各ランクに
対応するル−ルを割り付けル−ルとして選択するもので
あり、上記評価量算出手段は選択されたル−ルに基づい
て生産物の評価の対象となる納期余裕日数、残作業量等
の項目を評価した値を算出するものであり、上記評価点
算出手段は、算出された評価量を基に、予め設定した評
価点算出式を用いて評価点を算出するものである。ま
た、本発明を実施するシステムとしては、生産装置及び
生産物の複数種類の状態量と生産物を生産装置に対して
割り付けるための複数のル−ルを入力するキ−ボ−ドの
様な入力手段と、前記生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の
状態量と前記生産物を生産装置に対して割り付けるため
の複数のル−ルと、割り付け処理をした結果を蓄積する
手段と、前記処理の生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状
態量と生産物を生産装置に対して割り付けるための複数
のル−ルとを処理した結果を出力する手段と、最も評価
点の高い生産物を生産装置に割り付けた結果を表示する
ディスプレイ等の表示手段を有する。本システムおい
て、上記入力手段は、生産物を生産装置に対して、割り
付けるためのディスパッチングル−ルの1種であるル−
ル2、ル−ル1、ル−ル3等の異なったル−ルを入力
し、上記入力手段は、生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の
状態量を算出するための情報も入力し、生産物の生産装
置に対する割り付けの優先度を示す評価点の算出式も入
力するものであり、上記蓄積手段は、前記複数のル−ル
から選択された割り付けル−ルを蓄積し、さらに、生産
物の評価の対象となる納期余裕日数、残作業量、作業時
間等の値である評価量の算出された値を蓄積し、前記設
定した生産物の生産装置に対する割り付けの優先度を示
す評価点の算出式を蓄積し、前記評価量に基づいて算出
された生産物の割り付けの優先度をしめす評価点を蓄積
し、前記評価点を基に、前記算出手段により、生産物を
生産装置の工程管理図の時間軸に割り付けた結果も蓄積
するものである。The means for calculating a plurality of types of state quantities of the production apparatus and the product is information for calculating a plurality of kinds of state quantities of the production apparatus and the product such as the input production amount per day of the production apparatus. Based on the above, each of the calculation formulas is used to calculate, and the ranking means is a means for ranking the calculated state quantities of the product and the production apparatus according to the quantity, and the rule selection means. Is the rule corresponding to each rank of the state quantity of the product and the production apparatus from the rule such as rule 2, rule 1 which is one kind of dispatching rule accumulated in the accumulating means. It is to be selected as an allocation rule, and the evaluation amount calculation means calculates a value based on the selected rule by evaluating items such as spare delivery days and remaining work amount which are targets of product evaluation. The evaluation point calculation means is Evaluation quantity based on, and calculates an evaluation point by using the evaluation point calculation equation preset. As a system for carrying out the present invention, a production device and a plurality of kinds of state quantities of the product and a keyboard for inputting a plurality of rules for allocating the product to the production device are used. An input means, a plurality of types of state quantities of the production device and the product, a plurality of rules for allocating the product to the production device, means for accumulating the result of the allocation processing, and A means for outputting the result of processing a plurality of kinds of state quantities of the production equipment and the product and a plurality of rules for allocating the production equipment to the production equipment, and the production equipment having the highest evaluation point as the production equipment. It has display means such as a display for displaying the allocated result. In this system, the input means is one of dispatching rules for allocating a product to a production device.
Different rules such as rule 2, rule 1, rule 3, etc. are inputted, and the above-mentioned input means also inputs information for calculating a plurality of kinds of state quantities of the production device and the product, A calculation formula of an evaluation point indicating the priority of allocation to the production device of the product is also input, and the accumulating means accumulates the allocation rule selected from the plurality of rules, and further, the product. Accumulation of the calculated value of the evaluation amount, which is the value of the number of delivery days remaining to be evaluated, remaining work amount, work time, etc., Accumulation of calculation formulas, accumulation of evaluation points indicating the priority of product allocation calculated based on the evaluation amount, and based on the evaluation points, the calculation means controls the production process of the production apparatus. The results assigned to the time axis in the figure are also accumulated.
【0016】また、上記出力手段は生産物を生産装置の
工程管理図の時間軸に対して割り付けた結果を出力し、
ガントチャ−トとして、出力するものであり、上記表示
手段は、評価点を基に、生産物を生産装置の工程管理図
の時間軸に割り付けた結果を縦軸が工程、横軸が時間軸
のガントチャ−トとして表示するものであり、上記各処
理により、生産物と生産装置の状態量を考慮した最適な
生産計画の立案と、その確認が行なえる。The output means outputs the result of allocating the product to the time axis of the process control chart of the production apparatus,
The display means outputs as a Gantt chart, and the display means allocates the product to the time axis of the process control chart of the production device based on the evaluation points, and the vertical axis represents the process and the horizontal axis represents the time axis. This is displayed as a Gantt chart, and by the above-mentioned respective processes, an optimum production plan can be drafted and confirmed in consideration of the state quantities of the product and the production apparatus.
【0017】[0017]
【実施例】以下本発明による実施例を図を用いて説明す
る。まず、図1を用いて、実施例を計算機システム上で
実現する方法について述べる。Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. First, a method for implementing the embodiment on a computer system will be described with reference to FIG.
【0018】図1は、本実施例を実現するための計算機
システムのハ−ドウェア構成を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the hardware configuration of a computer system for realizing this embodiment.
【0019】図1に示す様に、本システムは、処理部
1、ディスプレイ2、キ−ボ−ド3、主記憶装置4、外
部記憶装置5、プリンタ6からなる。ここで、前記処理
部1は、状態量算出手段101、状態量のランク付け手
段102、ル−ル選択手段103、評価量算出手段10
4、評価点算出手段105、生産物の割り付け手段10
6からなる。As shown in FIG. 1, this system comprises a processing unit 1, a display 2, a keyboard 3, a main storage device 4, an external storage device 5, and a printer 6. Here, the processing unit 1 includes a state quantity calculation means 101, a state quantity ranking means 102, a rule selection means 103, and an evaluation quantity calculation means 10.
4, evaluation point calculation means 105, product allocation means 10
It consists of 6.
【0020】キ−ボ−ド3は生産物を生産装置に割り付
けるためのディスパッチングル−ルの1種であるル−ル
2等のル−ルと生産物及び生産装置の状態量の入力に用
いられる。処理部1は納期余裕等の生産物の状態量や作
業時間等の生産装置の状態量の測定、状態量のランク付
け、ディスパッチングル−ルの1種であるル−ル2ル−
ル1やル−ル3等の異なったル−ルを蓄積する外部記憶
装置5からの割り付けル−ルの選択、評価の対象となる
納期余裕日数、残作業量、作業時間等の値である評価量
算出、生産単位毎の割り付けの優先度を示す評価点の算
出、生産物の割り付けの実行に用いられる。主記憶装置
4は処理に必要なル−ルと生産物及び生産装置の状態の
展開と、各処理の結果の記載に用いられる。外部記憶装
置5は、前述のル−ルや生産物及び生産装置の状態、及
び処理結果等の情報を蓄積する。ディスプレイとプリン
タは処理の実行状況と処理結果の表示、出力に用いられ
る。図2を用いて、本発明の処理の流れを説明する。The key board 3 is used for inputting rules such as rule 2 which is one kind of dispatching rule for allocating the product to the production device and the state quantity of the product and the production device. To be The processing unit 1 measures the quantity of state of the product such as delivery time margin and the quantity of state of the production apparatus such as working time, ranks the quantity of state, and is a type of dispatching rule.
It is a value such as selection of an allocation rule from the external storage device 5 that accumulates different rules such as rule 1 and rule 3, spare delivery days to be evaluated, remaining work amount, and working time. It is used for calculation of the evaluation amount, calculation of evaluation points indicating the priority of allocation for each production unit, and allocation of products. The main storage device 4 is used for developing rules necessary for processing, development of states of products and production apparatuses, and description of results of each processing. The external storage device 5 stores information such as the above-mentioned rules, products and states of production devices, and processing results. The display and printer are used for displaying and outputting the execution status of the processing and the processing result. The processing flow of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.
【0021】まず、外部記憶装置5から生産物及び生産
装置の情報を読み込み主記憶装置上4に展開し、処理部
1に読み込む(ステップ7、8)。First, the information of the product and the production apparatus is read from the external storage device 5, expanded on the main storage device 4, and read into the processing unit 1 (steps 7 and 8).
【0022】次に、未処理の生産物があるかどうかを判
定し、生産物があるならば、残生産物の割り付け処理を
行なう(ステップ9)。残生産物の割り付け処理は、ま
ず、状態量の算出手段101を用いて、生産装置と生産
物の状態量を算出し(ステップ10)、算出した生産装
置及び生産物の状態に応じて、生産物の複数種類の状態
量をランク付けする(ステップ11)。次にそのランク
に基づいて、蓄積された複数のル−ル1、ル−ル2等の
ル−ルから割り付けに最も適したル−ルを選択/変更す
る(ステップ12)。Next, it is judged whether or not there is an unprocessed product, and if there is a product, the remaining product is allocated (step 9). In the allocation processing of the remaining products, first, the state quantity calculation means 101 is used to calculate the state quantities of the production apparatus and the products (step 10), and the production is performed according to the calculated states of the production apparatus and the products. The state quantities of a plurality of types of objects are ranked (step 11). Next, based on the rank, the most suitable rule for allocation is selected / changed from a plurality of accumulated rules 1, rule 2, etc. (step 12).
【0023】次に、キ−ボ−ドより入力された評価量の
算出式を用いて、選択したル−ルに基づく評価量の算出
を行ない(ステップ13)、評価量に基づいて、生産物
の割り付けの優先度を示す評価点の算出を行ない(ステ
ップ14)、評価点の高い順に生産物の割り付け処理を
行ない生産計画を立案する(ステップ15)。未処理の
生産物がなくなったらば、計画立案結果を出力し(ステ
ップ16)、立案計画を記憶装置に格納する(ステップ
17)。Next, the evaluation amount based on the selected rule is calculated using the evaluation amount calculation formula input from the keyboard (step 13), and the product is calculated based on the evaluation amount. The evaluation points indicating the priority of allocation are calculated (step 14), the products are allocated in the descending order of evaluation points, and the production plan is prepared (step 15). When there are no unprocessed products, the planning result is output (step 16) and the planning plan is stored in the storage device (step 17).
【0024】従来技術(確定的/確率的ディスパッチン
グ法)と本発明の大きな違いは、生産装置及び生産物の
状態量により、割り付けル−ルを決定し、さらにこのル
−ルに柔軟性を持たせたことである。The major difference between the prior art (deterministic / stochastic dispatching method) and the present invention is that the allocation rule is determined by the state quantity of the production equipment and the product, and the flexibility is given to this rule. That is what I had.
【0025】次に、図3の(1)を用いて具体的な本発
明による生産計画の立案結果の例を説明する。
図3の(1)は、納期の状態について、ゆるい、普
通、きつい等の3ランクに分類し、各ランクに基づいて
ル−ルの選択/変更を行ない、生産計画を立案した結果
の最良解の出現頻度を示している。ここでのル−ルは、
ディスパッチングル−ルであり、納期余裕の最も少ない
ものを選ぶというル−ル1、作業時間の最も少ないもの
を選ぶというル−ル2、残りの作業量の最も大きいもの
を選ぶというル−ル3、全くランダムに生産物を選択す
るル−ル4を使用した場合を示している。また、最良解
は、納期遅れ日数が最少のスケジュ−ルを立案したもの
であり、表においては、各ル−ルの最良解の出現頻度を
相対的に%の単位で算出した回数を ○、△、□の3つ
の種類に分類してある。図3の(1)に示す計画立案結
果より、生産物の状態量の1つである納期余裕の値によ
り、割り付けル−ルは変化させた方が、最良解の出現頻
度は高くなることがわかる。Next, an example of a concrete production plan drafting result according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.
3 (1) shows the best solution as a result of classifying the delivery status into 3 ranks such as loose, normal, and tight, selecting / changing the rule based on each rank, and formulating a production plan. Shows the appearance frequency of. The rule here is
It is a dispatching rule, that is, the rule 1 that chooses the one with the least deadline, the rule 2 that chooses the one that requires the least amount of work time, and the rule 3 that chooses the one that has the most remaining work. , Shows the case of using rule 4 which selects products at random. In addition, the best solution is a schedule with the least number of delivery days late, and in the table, the number of times the appearance frequency of the best solution of each rule is calculated in% is It is classified into three types, △ and □. From the planning result shown in (1) of FIG. 3, the frequency of occurrence of the best solution may be higher when the allocation rule is changed depending on the value of the delivery time margin, which is one of the state quantities of the product. Recognize.
【0026】具体的には、図3の(2)に示す様に、納
期の状態がランク1の場合は、ル−ル2が他のル−ルに
比べ高い割合で良い計画を作成し、納期状態がランク3
の場合は、ル−ル1が他のル−ルに比べ高い割合で良い
計画を作成する。この結果より、納期の状態がランク1
の場合はル−ル2を用いて、状態がランク3の場合はル
−ル1を用いて、生産順序を決定すれば、ル−ルを固定
して割り付け処理を行なう確定的ディスパッチング法に
比べて、最良解がさらに出やすくなることがわかる。Specifically, as shown in (2) of FIG. 3, when the delivery date is rank 1, a good plan is prepared with a higher ratio of rule 2 than other rules, Delivery status is rank 3
In the case of, rule 1 creates a good plan at a higher rate than other rules. From this result, the delivery status is rank 1
If the production order is determined by using rule 2 in the case of, and rule 1 in the case of the state of rank 3, the rule is fixed in the deterministic dispatching method for performing the allocation process. By comparison, it is clear that the best solution is even easier to obtain.
【0027】図3の(3)の例を用いて、具体的に生産
装置及び生産物の状態量に基づいて、割り付けル−ルを
選択/変更し、そのル−ルに基づいて、生産計画の立案
を行なう。Using the example of (3) in FIG. 3, the allocation rule is specifically selected / changed based on the state quantity of the production device and the product, and the production plan is selected based on the rule. Plan.
【0028】図3の(3)の生産装置では、すでに、納
期の状態がゆるい場合はル−ル1を用いて、生産物をW
→X→Yという順序で生産し、状態がきつい場合はル−
ル2を用いて、Zを生産している。次には、ル−ル1を
用いて、納期余裕の一番少ないCが生産され、工程1に
割り付けられることになる。この様に、適用するル−ル
を動的に変更することによって、状況の変化に応じた割
リ付けが可能になる。In the production apparatus (3) of FIG. 3, when the delivery date is already loose, the rule 1 is used to produce the product by W.
->X-> Y is produced in order, and if the condition is tight,
R2 is used to produce Z. Next, using the rule 1, C having the smallest delivery deadline is produced and allocated to the process 1. In this way, by dynamically changing the rules to be applied, it is possible to make allocations according to changes in the situation.
【0029】ところで、「納期」という1つの条件だけ
を重視して計画を作成したい場合はこれで良いが、実際
の生産順序の決定では、生産装置の生産の効率や負荷の
状況などが変化するため他の条件をも考慮することが必
要となる。そこで、割り付け状況の変化に応じて、この
様な項目を総合的に考慮できる様に、生産物の割り付け
優先度(評価点)を算出し、それにより割り付ける方式
を実現する。例えば、図4に示す様に、納期の他に、生
産可能個数に対する割り付け個数の割合(負荷率)や割
り付け可能個数に対する段取り損失を考慮した実際の割
り付け個数の割合(生産の効率)を考慮した計画を立案
するものとする。現在の割り付け状態は、納期余裕がふ
つうで、負荷率は15%(ランク2)、生産の効率は4
0%(ランク2)とする。By the way, when it is desired to create a plan by emphasizing only one condition of "delivery date", this is sufficient, but in the actual determination of the production sequence, the production efficiency of the production apparatus and the load situation change. Therefore, it is necessary to consider other conditions. Therefore, according to the change of the allocation situation, the allocation priority (evaluation point) of the products is calculated so that such items can be comprehensively considered, and the allocation method is realized by the calculation. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, in addition to the delivery date, the ratio of the allocation number to the producible number (load factor) and the ratio of the actual allocation number considering the setup loss to the allocable number (production efficiency) are considered. A plan shall be drawn up. The current allocation status is that the delivery time is usually marginal, the load factor is 15% (rank 2), and the production efficiency is 4
0% (rank 2).
【0030】このとき、本発明では、例えばル−ル2、
ル−ル3等のそれぞれの状態量に適した適用すべきル−
ルの評価量と、そのル−ルをどの程度重視するかという
重要度の積和から、生産物の割り付け順序の評価点Ex
nを まだ割り付けられていない全ての生産物に対して
算出する。 Exn=x{評価量(r)*重要度(r)} そして評価点が最大な生産物を生産装置に割り付けるこ
とを繰り返し、計画を立案する。まず、図5の評価量及
び生産条件の重要度のデ−タを用いて具体的な評価量の
決定を説明する。At this time, in the present invention, for example, rule 2,
Applicable rules suitable for each state quantity such as rule 3
From the product sum of the evaluation amount of the rule and the degree of importance of the rule, the evaluation point Ex of the allocation order of the products
Calculate n for all products not yet assigned. Exn = x {evaluation amount (r) * importance (r)} Then, the product having the largest evaluation point is repeatedly assigned to the production apparatus to make a plan. First, the specific determination of the evaluation amount will be described using the data of the evaluation amount and the importance of the production conditions in FIG.
【0031】図4のル−ル1は、納期余裕の少ないもの
を選ぶル−ルであり、ル−ル2は、作業時間の少ないも
のを選ぶル−ルであり、ル−ル3は、残作業量の少ない
ものを選ぶル−ルである。例では、納期余裕が普通(ラ
ンク2)であるため、図4に示す通り、ル−ル2を選択
して、作業時間を評価した値を評価量として算出する。
また、負荷率は15%(ランク2)の為、ル−ル3を選
択して、残作業量を評価した値を評価量として算出す
る。また、生産の効率は40%(ランク2)の為、ル−
ル2を選択して、作業時間を評価した値を評価量として
算出する。図5に示す生産物ABCの評価点の算出式
は、以下の通りである。Ex1=x{評価量(r)*重
要度(r)}=(ル−ル2を適用したときの評価量)*
(納期余裕に対する優先度)+(ル−ル3を適用したと
きの評価量)*(負荷率に対する優先度)+(ル−ル2
を適用したときの評価量)*(生産の効率に対する優先
度)Ea1=納期余裕*納期余裕の重要度+残作業量*
負荷率の重要度+残作業時間*生産の効率の重要度Eb
1=納期余裕*納期余裕の重要度+残作業量*負荷率の
重要度+残作業時間*生産の効率の重要度Ec1=納期
余裕*納期余裕の重要度+残作業量*負荷率の重要度+
残作業時間*生産の効率の重要度Ea1=5*(−0.
6)+60*0.2+1*(−0.3)=9+0.3=
9.3Eb1=3*(−0.6)+70*0.2+5*
(−0.3)=14−3.3=11.3Ec1=2*
(−0.6)+30*0.2+3*(−0.3)=6−
2.1=3.1従って、優先順位は、評価点の高い順に
B→A→Cの順になる。The rule 1 in FIG. 4 is a rule for selecting a product having a small delivery time margin, the rule 2 is a rule for selecting a product having a short working time, and the rule 3 is a rule. It is a rule to choose a machine with a small amount of remaining work. In the example, since the delivery time margin is normal (rank 2), as shown in FIG. 4, the rule 2 is selected and the value obtained by evaluating the working time is calculated as the evaluation amount.
Further, since the load factor is 15% (rank 2), the rule 3 is selected, and the evaluation value of the remaining work amount is calculated as the evaluation amount. In addition, since the production efficiency is 40% (rank 2),
2 is selected, and the value obtained by evaluating the working time is calculated as the evaluation amount. The calculation formula of the evaluation score of the product ABC shown in FIG. 5 is as follows. Ex1 = x {evaluation amount (r) * importance (r)} = (evaluation amount when rule 2 is applied) *
(Priority for delivery margin) + (evaluation amount when rule 3 is applied) * (priority for load factor) + (rule 2
(Evaluation amount when applying) * (Priority to production efficiency) Ea1 = Delivery time margin * Importance of delivery time margin + Remaining work volume *
Importance of load factor + remaining work time * Importance of production efficiency Eb
1 = Delivery time margin * Importance of delivery time margin + Remaining work amount * Importance of load factor + Remaining work time * Importance of production efficiency Ec1 = Delivery time margin * Importance of delivery time allowance + Remaining work volume * Importance of load factor Degree +
Remaining work time * Importance of production efficiency Ea1 = 5 * (-0.
6) + 60 * 0.2 + 1 * (-0.3) = 9 + 0.3 =
9.3Eb1 = 3 * (-0.6) + 70 * 0.2 + 5 *
(-0.3) = 14-3.3 = 11.3 Ec1 = 2 *
(-0.6) + 30 * 0.2 + 3 * (-0.3) = 6-
2.1 = 3.1 Therefore, the priority order is B → A → C in descending order of evaluation points.
【0032】次に先の例の生産装置及び生産物の状態量
が以下の様に変化した時のル−ルの選択と評価点の算出
式を示す。Next, the formulas for selecting the rules and calculating the evaluation points when the state quantity of the production apparatus and the product of the above example are changed as follows are shown.
【0033】 納期余裕:きつい → ル−ル1を適用する。Delivery time allowance: Tight → Rule 1 is applied.
【0034】 負荷率 :20% → ル−ル3を適用する。Load factor: 20% → Rule 3 is applied.
【0035】 生産の効率 :40%→ ル−ル2を適用する。Production efficiency: 40% → Rule 2 is applied.
【0036】 Ex2=x{評価量(r)*重要度(r)} =(ル−ル1を適用したときの評価量)*(納期余裕に
対する優先度) +(ル−ル3を適用したときの評価量)*(負荷率に対
する優先度) +(ル−ル2を適用したときの評価量)*(生産の効率
に対する優先度) Ea2=納期余裕*納期余裕の重要度+残作業量*負荷
率の重要度+納期余裕*生産の効率の重要度 Eb2=納期余裕*納期余裕の重要度+残作業量*負荷
率の重要度+納期余裕*生産の効率の重要度 Ec2=納期余裕*納期余裕の重要度+残作業量*負荷
率の重要度+納期余裕*生産の効率の重要度 Ea2=1*(−0.6)+60*0.2+1*(−
0.3) =12−0.9=11.1 Eb2=5*(−0.6)+70*0.2+5*(−
0.3)=14−4.5=9.5 Ec2=3*(−0.6)+30*0.2+3*(−
0.3)=10−2.7=7.3 従って、各生産物の評価点はAが11.1、Bが9.
5、Cが7.3であり、優先順位は、評価点の高い順に
A→B→Cの順になる。Ex2 = x {evaluation amount (r) * importance (r)} = (evaluation amount when rule 1 is applied) * (priority for delivery margin) + (rule 3 is applied) Evaluation amount) * (Priority for load factor) + (Evaluation amount when rule 2 is applied) * (Priority for production efficiency) Ea2 = Deadline margin * Importance of deadline margin + remaining work volume * Importance of load factor + margin of delivery time * Importance of production efficiency Eb2 = margin of delivery date * Importance of delivery allowance + remaining work amount * Importance of load factor + delivery margin * Importance of production efficiency Ec2 = delivery allowance * Importance of delivery time margin + remaining work volume * Importance of load factor + delivery time margin * Importance of production efficiency Ea2 = 1 * (-0.6) + 60 * 0.2 + 1 * (-
0.3) = 12-0.9 = 11.1 Eb2 = 5 * (-0.6) + 70 * 0.2 + 5 * (-
0.3) = 14−4.5 = 9.5 Ec2 = 3 * (− 0.6) + 30 * 0.2 + 3 * (−
0.3) = 10-2.7 = 7.3 Therefore, the evaluation points of each product are 11.1 for A and 9. for B.
5 and C are 7.3, and the priority order is A → B → C in descending order of evaluation points.
【0037】各生産物を優先順位の高い順に生産装置の
工程管理図の時間軸に割り付ける処理を生産物がなくな
るまで繰り返すことにより、生産計画の立案を行なう。A production plan is created by repeating the process of assigning each product to the time axis of the process control chart of the production apparatus in the order of priority.
【0038】また、上記の様な計画立案結果は、図6に
示す様にガントチャ−トとして出力する(図6)。この
ガントチャ−トは、縦軸に工程種別、横軸に生産装置の
工程管理図の時間軸を示したものである。The above planning result is output as a Gantt chart as shown in FIG. 6 (FIG. 6). In this Gantt chart, the vertical axis shows the process type and the horizontal axis shows the time axis of the process control chart of the production apparatus.
【0039】[0039]
【発明の効果】以上説明した様に、本発明によれば、デ
ィスパッチングル−ルの複数ル−ルを合成することによ
り、計画立案過程において、流動的に変化する生産の効
率等の生産装置の状態量や納期余裕等の生産物の状態量
の変化に応じて、生産物や生産装置の状態量を総合的に
考慮した最適な生産計画の立案を短時間で行ない、計画
立案結果を確認できる。As described above, according to the present invention, by synthesizing a plurality of dispatching rules, a production apparatus such as a production efficiency which is fluidly changed in a planning process. According to changes in the state quantity of the product such as the state quantity and the delivery time margin, the optimal production plan that comprehensively considers the state quantity of the product and the production equipment can be created in a short time, and the planning result can be confirmed. .
【図1】本発明を実現するための計算機システムのハ−
ドウェア構成を示す図である。FIG. 1 shows a computer system for implementing the present invention.
It is a figure which shows a hardware structure.
【図2】本発明の実施例の処理フロ−を示す図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a processing flow of an embodiment of the present invention.
【図3】(1)は、ディスパッチング法による生産計画
立案結果の最良解の出現頻度を示す図である。(2)
は、生産物の納期余裕の状態量による割り付けル−ルの
選択/変更を示す図である。(3)は、選択したル−ル
に基づいた生産物の割り付けを示す図である。FIG. 3 (1) is a diagram showing the appearance frequency of the best solution of the production planning result by the dispatching method. (2)
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing selection / change of an allocation rule according to a state quantity of a delivery time margin of a product. (3) is a figure which shows allocation of the product based on the selected rule.
【図4】(1)は、納期余裕の状態による割り付けル−
ルの選択を示す図である。(2)は、負荷率の状態量に
よる割り付けル−ルの選択を示す図である。(3)は、
生産の効率の状態量による割り付けル−ルの選択を示す
図である。[Fig. 4] (1) shows an allocation rule depending on a state of delivery time margin.
It is a figure which shows selection of a rule. (2) is a figure which shows selection of the allocation rule by the state quantity of a load factor. (3) is
It is a figure which shows the selection of the allocation rule by the state quantity of the efficiency of production.
【図5】選択ル−ルを基に算出した評価点を示す図であ
る。FIG. 5 is a diagram showing evaluation points calculated based on selected rules.
【図6】本発明により生産物を生産装置に割り付けた結
果を展開したガントチャ−トを示す図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a Gantt chart in which a result of allocating a product to a production apparatus according to the present invention is developed.
【図7】(1)は、ディスパッチング法におけるル−ル
デ−タを示す図である。(2)は、生産物と生産装置の
状態量のデ−タフォ−マットを示す図である。(3)
は、確定的ディスパッチング法による計画作成結果を示
す図である。FIG. 7 (1) is a diagram showing rule data in the dispatching method. (2) is a diagram showing a data format of state quantities of a product and a production apparatus. (3)
[Fig. 6] is a diagram showing a plan creation result by the deterministic dispatching method.
Claims (3)
において、生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量を算
出する手段と、前記生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状
態量をランク付けする手段と、予め異なった複数のディ
スパッチングル−ルを蓄積する蓄積手段と、ランク付け
された状態量のランクを用いて該蓄積手段から最適なル
−ルを選択する手段と、前記選択されたル−ルに基づ
き、生産物及び生産装置の評価の対象となる評価量を算
出する手段と、前記評価量を用いて、生産単位毎に生産
物の割り付けの優先度を示す評価点の算出式に基づいて
評価点の算出を行なう手段と、前記算出手段により算出
された評価点のうち、最も評価点の高い生産物を生産装
置の工程管理図の時間軸に割り付ける手段とを具備する
ことを特徴とする生産計画立案方式。1. In a system for planning a production plan for each production unit, a means for calculating a plurality of types of state quantities of a production device and a product and a ranking of the plurality of types of state quantities of the production device and a product. Means, accumulating means for accumulating a plurality of different dispatching rules in advance, means for selecting an optimum rule from the accumulating means using the rank of the ranked state quantity, and the selected rule. -A means for calculating an evaluation amount that is an object of evaluation of a product and a production apparatus based on a rule, and a calculation formula of an evaluation point indicating a priority of allocation of a product for each production unit by using the evaluation amount. And a means for allocating a product having the highest evaluation score among the evaluation scores calculated by the calculating device to the time axis of the process control chart of the production apparatus. To live Planning method.
率や生産の効率の状態量を算出し、前記評価量の算出手
段は、納期余裕日数、残作業量、作業時間等の値である
評価量を算出し、前記評価点の算出手段は、複数のル-
ルの合成により評価点を算出することを特徴とする請求
項第1項記載の生産計画立案方式。2. The state quantity calculating means calculates a state quantity of a delivery deadline, a load factor, and production efficiency, and the evaluation amount calculating means calculates a value of a delivery deadline, remaining work amount, working time, and the like. The calculation means of the evaluation point is a plurality of rules.
The production planning method according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation points are calculated by synthesizing the rules.
算出するための情報及び生産物を生産装置に対して割り
付けるための複数のル−ルを入力する手段と、前記生産
装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量及び生産物を生産装
置に対して割り付けるための複数のル−ルを処理する処
理手段と、前記生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量
と生産物を生産装置に対して割り付けるための複数のル
−ルと、それらを割り付け処理した結果を蓄積する手段
と、前記処理の生産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量
と生産物を生産装置に対して割り付けるための複数のル
−ルとを処理した結果を表示する手段と、前記処理の生
産装置及び生産物の複数種類の状態量と生産物を生産装
置に対して割り付けるための複数のル−ルとを処理した
結果を出力する手段とを有し、 前記入力手段は、生産単位毎に生産物の割り付けの優先
度を示す評価点の算出式を入力し、前記処理手段におい
て算出された評価点のうち、最も評価点の高い生産物を
生産装置に割り付けた結果を算出し、前記処理手段より
算出された評価点のうち、最も評価点の高い生産物を生
産装置に割り付けた結果を前記蓄積手段に蓄積すると共
に、前記表示手段に表示し、かつ出力手段に出力するこ
とを特徴とする生産計画立案方式。3. A means for inputting information for calculating a plurality of kinds of state quantities of a production device and a product and a plurality of rules for allocating the product to the production device, and the production device and the production. Processing means for processing a plurality of rules for allocating a plurality of kinds of state quantities of a product to a production apparatus, and a plurality of kinds of state quantities of the production apparatus and the product and a production apparatus A plurality of rules for allocation, means for accumulating the results of the allocation processing, a plurality of state quantities of the production apparatus and the product of the processing, and a product for allocating the product to the production apparatus Processing means for displaying a result of processing a plurality of rules, and a plurality of rules for allocating the production device and the plurality of state quantities of the product and the product to the production device of the processing To output the result Wherein the input means inputs a calculation formula of an evaluation score indicating the priority of product allocation for each production unit, and the production process with the highest evaluation score among the evaluation scores calculated by the processing means. The result of allocating the product to the production device is calculated, and the result of allocating the product having the highest evaluation score among the evaluation points calculated by the processing means to the production device is accumulated in the accumulating means, and the display means is provided. A production planning method, which is characterized in that it is displayed on and output to an output means.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP31816492A JPH06162037A (en) | 1992-11-27 | 1992-11-27 | Plan forming system for production planning |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP31816492A JPH06162037A (en) | 1992-11-27 | 1992-11-27 | Plan forming system for production planning |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH06162037A true JPH06162037A (en) | 1994-06-10 |
Family
ID=18096191
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP31816492A Pending JPH06162037A (en) | 1992-11-27 | 1992-11-27 | Plan forming system for production planning |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH06162037A (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH08249187A (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1996-09-27 | Nec Corp | Search device |
JP2005148940A (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2005-06-09 | Kawasaki Microelectronics Kk | Scheduling device |
JP2018147281A (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Ground-breaking rule alteration device and production management system |
JP2020119061A (en) * | 2019-01-21 | 2020-08-06 | アズビル株式会社 | Scheduling system, schedule generation device, and preference value calculation device, program and method therefor |
CN114980519A (en) * | 2022-05-25 | 2022-08-30 | 深圳友特精密配件有限公司 | Machining operation method and system based on ultra-long PCBA |
-
1992
- 1992-11-27 JP JP31816492A patent/JPH06162037A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH08249187A (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1996-09-27 | Nec Corp | Search device |
JP2005148940A (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2005-06-09 | Kawasaki Microelectronics Kk | Scheduling device |
JP2018147281A (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Ground-breaking rule alteration device and production management system |
JP2020119061A (en) * | 2019-01-21 | 2020-08-06 | アズビル株式会社 | Scheduling system, schedule generation device, and preference value calculation device, program and method therefor |
CN114980519A (en) * | 2022-05-25 | 2022-08-30 | 深圳友特精密配件有限公司 | Machining operation method and system based on ultra-long PCBA |
CN114980519B (en) * | 2022-05-25 | 2024-04-26 | 深圳友特精密配件有限公司 | Processing operation method and system based on ultra-long PCBA |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JPH05225205A (en) | Sequential defined production planning system | |
JP5134601B2 (en) | Production schedule creation device | |
JP2002373013A (en) | Production scheduling method, program for computer to execute the same method and computer-readable recording medium with the program recorded thereon | |
US7925365B2 (en) | Rough-cut capacity planning with production constraints and dynamic bottleneck considerations | |
CN111158320A (en) | Area use planning system, area use planning method, and area use planning device | |
Klevanskiy et al. | Multi-project scheduling: multicriteria time-cost trade-off problem | |
JPH06162037A (en) | Plan forming system for production planning | |
JP2013122733A (en) | Production planning program and production planning device | |
Meier et al. | Resource planning of industrial product-service systems (IPS 2) by a heuristic resource planning approach | |
JP2004145880A (en) | Method of preparing production schedule | |
JP3195385B2 (en) | Production planning system and production planning method | |
Lohmer et al. | Multi-factory job shop scheduling with due date objective | |
JP4595454B2 (en) | Production process organizing apparatus and method | |
Demir et al. | Process planning and scheduling with WNOPPT weighted due-date assignment where earliness, tardiness and due-dates are penalized | |
JP4313652B2 (en) | Scheduling device | |
JP2000040099A (en) | Device and method for preparing schedule, selecting method for job and recording medium recording software of schedule preparation | |
JP4648013B2 (en) | Production scheduling system | |
JPH0535747A (en) | Scheduling system | |
Demir et al. | Integrating Process Planning, WMS Dispatching, and WPPW Weighted Due Date Assignment Using a Genetic Algorithm | |
CN115239216B (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for preventive planned maintenance of production resources | |
JPH11126221A (en) | Production plan scheduling device | |
Yeung et al. | Using real options analysis to value reoptimization options in the shifting bottleneck heuristic | |
JPH10244442A (en) | Large-scale production planning method | |
JP3045075B2 (en) | Production scheduling method | |
Ismail et al. | Modeling of multi-level capacitated lot-size scheduling problem |