JPH056288A - Mutual standby system - Google Patents

Mutual standby system

Info

Publication number
JPH056288A
JPH056288A JP3157331A JP15733191A JPH056288A JP H056288 A JPH056288 A JP H056288A JP 3157331 A JP3157331 A JP 3157331A JP 15733191 A JP15733191 A JP 15733191A JP H056288 A JPH056288 A JP H056288A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
processing system
business processing
host
business
threshold
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP3157331A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2666611B2 (en
Inventor
Sumi Asakura
寿美 朝倉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Corp
Original Assignee
NEC Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NEC Corp filed Critical NEC Corp
Priority to JP3157331A priority Critical patent/JP2666611B2/en
Publication of JPH056288A publication Critical patent/JPH056288A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2666611B2 publication Critical patent/JP2666611B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To continue the work of another work processing system without switching a host even in the case of completing the work processing system with a high priority order. CONSTITUTION:A group 31 (32) composed of a work processing system 11 (12) of a host 1 and a work processing system 21 (22) of a host 2 has a priority order 41 (42). When the work processing system 11 with the higher priority order 41 is turned to the state of dividing a threshold value, the host is switched. Even when the work processing system 12 with the lower priority order 42 is turned to the state of dividing the threshold value, the host is not switched. When the work processing system 12 recovers the threshold value dividing state, the state is canceled. Even when the work processing system 11 is completed, the host is not switched but the work processing system 12 is continued.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は相互スタンバイシステム
に関し、特に複数の業務処理系を有するホストで、各業
務処理系それぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を有する相互
スタンバイシステムに関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a mutual standby system, and more particularly to a mutual standby system which is a host having a plurality of business processing systems and has a threshold value relating to the processing capacity of each business processing system.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来の相互スタンバイシステムは、利用
者が要求する処理を行っている稼働業務処理系と、稼働
業務処理系の障害時に業務を引き継ぐ待機業務処理系と
を一つのグループとし、各ホストにグループからの異な
る稼働業務処理系や待機業務処理系を有し、それぞれの
稼働業務を行いながらお互いに監視し合い、他ホストが
処理続行の不可能状態となった時には、処理続行の不可
能状態なったホストの稼働業務処理系と同一グループで
ある自ホストの待機業務処理系に業務を引き継ぐことに
より、利用者には処理続行の不可能状態とみえないよう
にしている。
2. Description of the Related Art In a conventional mutual standby system, an active business processing system that performs processing requested by a user and a standby business processing system that takes over the business in the event of a failure of the active business processing system are grouped into one group. The host has different active business processing systems and standby business processing systems from the group, monitors each other while performing their respective active business, and when other hosts become unable to continue processing By handing over the work to the standby job processing system of the local host that is in the same group as the operating job processing system of the enabled host, the user does not think that the processing cannot be continued.

【0003】そして、従来の相互スタンバイシステム
は、複数の業務処理系を有するホストで、各業務処理系
がそれぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を有し、最優先順位
でない稼働業務処理系の該閾値が最も大きい場合に、最
優先順位の稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態と
なった場合にはホストの切り替えを行い、最優先順位で
ない稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態となった
場合にはホストの切り替えを行わず、該業務処理系の処
理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復している場合も、該業務
処理系よりも優先順位の高い稼働業務処理系の終了時に
はホストの切り替え行うことにより、該業務を継続して
いた。
A conventional mutual standby system is a host having a plurality of business processing systems. Each business processing system has a threshold value relating to its processing capacity, and the threshold value of an operating business processing system that is not the highest priority is the highest. When the processing capacity of the highest priority active business processing system is below the threshold level, the host is switched, and the processing capacity of the non-highest priority active business processing system is below the threshold level. Even if the processing capacity of the business processing system has recovered from the threshold value broken state, the host should be switched at the end of the active business processing system with a higher priority than the business processing system. Therefore, the business was continued.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上述した従来の相互ス
タンバイシステムは、複数の業務処理系を有するホスト
で、各業務処理系がそれぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を
有し、最優先順位でない稼働業務処理系の該閾値が最も
大きい場合に、最優先順位の稼働業務処理系の処理能力
が閾値割れ状態となった場合にはホストの切り替えを行
い、最優先順位でない稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値
割れ状態となった場合にはホストの切り替えを行わず、
該業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復してい
る場合にも、該業務処理系よりも優先順位の高い稼働業
務処理系の終了時には、該業務を継続するためにホスト
の切り替えを行わなければならないという欠点を有して
いる。
The conventional mutual standby system described above is a host having a plurality of business processing systems, each business processing system having a threshold value relating to its processing capacity, and operating business processing which is not the highest priority. When the threshold value of the system is the largest and the processing capacity of the operating task processing system with the highest priority falls below the threshold value, the host is switched, and the processing capacity of the operating task processing system without the highest priority is the threshold value. If it becomes cracked, do not switch the host,
Even when the processing capacity of the business processing system is recovered from the threshold value broken state, the host is switched to continue the business at the end of the active business processing system having a higher priority than the business processing system. It has the drawback of having to be.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の相互スタンバイ
システムは、利用者が要求する処理を行っている稼働業
務処理系と、前記稼働業務処理系の障害時に業務を引き
継ぐ待機業務処理系とを一つのグループとし、各ホスト
にグループの異なる稼働業務処理系や待機業務処理系を
有し、それぞれの稼働業務を行いながらお互いに監視し
合い、他ホストが処理続行の不可能状態となった時に
は、処理続行の不可能状態となったホストの稼働業務処
理系と同一グループである自ホストの待機業務処理系に
業務を引き継ぐことにより、利用者には処理続行の不可
能状態とみえないようにする相互スタンバイシステムに
おいて、複数の業務処理系を有するホストで、各業務処
理系がそれぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を有し、最優先
順位でない稼働業務処理系の該閾値が最も大きい場合
に、 処理能力の縮退回復検知手段と、各業務処理系の
閾値管理表と、各業務処理系の閾値管理表参照手段と、
各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態検知手段と、各業務処理系
の閾値割れ状態回復検知手段とを有することにより、最
優先順位の稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態と
なった場合にはホストの切り替えを行い、最優先順位で
ない稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態となった
場合にはホストの切り替えを行わず、該業務処理系の処
理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復した時にそれを認識して
閾値割れ状態を解除することにより、該業務処理系より
も優先順位の高い稼働業務処理系の終了時にもホストの
切り替えを行うことなく業務を続行する、ことにより構
成されている。
The mutual standby system of the present invention comprises an active business processing system which performs processing requested by a user and a standby business processing system which takes over the business when the active business processing system fails. When a single group is used, and each host has operating and standby business processing systems of different groups, monitor each other while performing their respective operating tasks, and when other hosts become unable to continue processing , By not handing over the work to the standby job processing system of the local host, which is in the same group as the operating job processing system of the host in which processing cannot be continued, prevents the user from seeing that the processing cannot be continued In a mutual standby system, in a host having multiple business processing systems, each business processing system has a threshold value related to its processing capacity, and the operational business is not the highest priority. If the threshold value of science largest, and degenerate recovery detection means processing power, a threshold management table for each business processing system, a threshold management table reference means for each business processing system,
When the threshold value broken state detection means of each business processing system and the threshold value broken state recovery detection means of each business processing system are provided, when the processing capacity of the highest priority operating business processing system becomes the threshold value broken state. When the host is switched and the processing capacity of the operating processing system that is not the highest priority is in the threshold cracking state, the host is not switched, and when the processing capacity of the business processing system is recovered from the threshold breaking state Is recognized and the state in which the threshold value is broken is cancelled, the work is continued without switching the host even when the active work processing system having a higher priority than the work processing system is terminated.

【0006】[0006]

【実施例】次に、本発明の実施例について図面を参照し
て説明する。
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings.

【0007】図1は本発明の相互スタンバイシステムの
一実施例を示すブロック図である。図1の相互スタンバ
イシステムは、ホスト1と、ホスト2とから構成されて
おり、ホスト1とホスト2とはパス3を介して接続され
ている。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of the mutual standby system of the present invention. The mutual standby system in FIG. 1 is composed of a host 1 and a host 2, and the host 1 and the host 2 are connected via a path 3.

【0008】また、ホスト1が有する稼働業務処理系1
1とホスト2が有する待機業務処理系21とから成るグ
ループ31は、優先順位41を有し、ホスト1が有する
稼働業務処理系12とホスト2が有する待機業務処理系
22とから成るグループ32は、優先順位42を有し、
グループ31の優先順位41の方がグループ32の優先
順位42よりも高いものとする。
[0008] Also, the operating task processing system 1 of the host 1
1 and the standby work processing system 21 of the host 2 have a priority order 41, and the group 32 of the active work processing system 12 of the host 1 and the standby work processing system 22 of the host 2 , With priority 42,
It is assumed that the priority order 41 of the group 31 is higher than the priority order 42 of the group 32.

【0009】そして、ホスト1は、グループ31に含ま
れる稼働業務処理系11と、グループ32に含まれる稼
働業務処理系12と、処理能力の縮退回復検知手段13
と、各業務処理系の閾値管理表14と、各業務処理系の
閾値管理表参照手段15と、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状
態検知手段16と、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態回復検
知手段17とを含んで構成されている。
Then, the host 1 includes an operating task processing system 11 included in the group 31, an operating task processing system 12 included in the group 32, and a processing capacity degradation recovery detecting means 13.
A threshold management table 14 for each business processing system, a threshold management table reference means 15 for each business processing system, a threshold cracked state detection means 16 for each business processing system, and a threshold cracked state recovery detection means for each business processing system. And 17 are included.

【0010】一方、ホスト2は、グループ31に含まれ
る待機業務処理系21と、グループ32に含まれる待機
業務処理系22と、処理能力の縮退回復検知手段23
と、各業務処理系の閾値管理表24と、各業務処理系の
閾値管理表参照手段25と、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状
態検知手段26と、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態回復検
知手段27とを含んで構成されいる。
On the other hand, the host 2 has a standby business processing system 21 included in the group 31, a standby business processing system 22 included in the group 32, and a degrading recovery detecting means 23 of the processing capacity.
A threshold management table 24 for each business processing system, a threshold management table reference means 25 for each business processing system, a threshold cracked state detection means 26 for each business processing system, and a threshold cracked state recovery detection means for each business processing system. And 27.

【0011】次に、図1の相互スタンバイシステムにお
ける情報処理能力に関する閾値制御について説明する。
Next, threshold control regarding information processing capability in the mutual standby system of FIG. 1 will be described.

【0012】利用者がホスト1及びホスト2を相互スタ
ンバイシステムとして利用を開始した時に、ホスト1の
処理能力の縮退により稼働業務処理系12の処理能力が
閾値割れ状態になったとすると、ホスト1は、ホスト1
に存在する処理能力の縮退回復検知手段13により処理
能力の縮退を検知し、各業務処理系の閾値管理表参照手
段15により稼働業務処理系11と稼働業務処理系12
との閾値を認識し、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態検知手
段16により稼働業務処理系12の処理能力が閾値割れ
状態となったことを認識するが、稼働業務処理系12の
有する優先順位42よりも稼働業務処理系11の有する
優先順位41の方が高く、稼働業務処理系11は閾値割
れ状態となっていないのでホストの切り替えを行わな
い。
When the user starts using the host 1 and the host 2 as a mutual standby system and the processing capacity of the host 1 is reduced and the processing capacity of the active task processing system 12 falls below a threshold value, the host 1 , Host 1
The degeneration of the processing capacity is detected by the degeneracy recovery detecting means 13 of the existing processing capacity, and the threshold management table referring means 15 of each business processing system operates the operating business processing system 11 and the operating business processing system 12.
Is recognized, and the threshold value cracking state detection means 16 of each task processing system recognizes that the processing capacity of the working task processing system 12 is in the threshold cracking state. However, the priority order 42 of the working task processing system 12 is recognized. The priority order 41 of the active work processing system 11 is higher than that of the active work processing system 11. Since the active work processing system 11 is not in a threshold value cracking state, the host is not switched.

【0013】この後に、ホスト1の処理能力の回復によ
り稼働業務処理系12の処理能力が閾値割れ状態から回
復したとすると、ホスト1は、ホスト1に存在する処理
能力の縮退回復検知手段13により処理能力の回復を検
知し、各業務処理系の閾値管理表参照手段15により稼
働業務処理系11と稼働業務処理系12との閾値を認識
し、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態回復検知手段17によ
り稼働業務処理系12の処理能力が閾値割れ状態から回
復したことを認識する。
After that, if the processing capacity of the active task processing system 12 is recovered from the threshold value broken state due to the recovery of the processing capacity of the host 1, the host 1 detects by the degeneracy recovery detecting means 13 of the processing capacity existing in the host 1. The recovery of the processing capacity is detected, the threshold value management table reference means 15 of each business processing system recognizes the threshold values of the active business processing system 11 and the active business processing system 12, and the threshold value broken state recovery detection means 17 of each business processing system is detected. By doing so, it is recognized that the processing capacity of the operating task processing system 12 has recovered from the threshold value breaking state.

【0014】次に、稼働業務処理系11が終了すると、
稼働業務処理系12がホスト1内で一番優先順位の高い
業務処理系となり、ホスト1に存在する各業務処理系の
閾値割れ状態回復検知手段17により稼働業務処理系1
2の処理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復したことを認識し
て閾値割れ状態を解除することにより、ホストの切り替
えを行うことなく稼働業務処理系12の業務を続行す
る。
Next, when the operation processing system 11 is finished,
The active business processing system 12 becomes the highest priority business processing system in the host 1, and the active business processing system 1 is detected by the threshold value break state recovery detection means 17 of each business processing system existing in the host 1.
By recognizing that the processing capacity of No. 2 has recovered from the threshold value broken state and canceling the threshold value broken state, the work of the work processing system 12 is continued without switching the host.

【0015】以上述べたように、本実施例の相互スタン
バイシステムは、複数の業務処理系を有するホストで、
各業務処理系がそれぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を有
し、最優先順位でない稼働業務処理系の該閾値が最も大
きい場合に、処理能力の縮退回復検知手段と、各業務処
理系の閾値管理表と、各業務処理系の閾値管理表参照手
段と、各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態検知手段と、各業務
処理系の閾値割れ状態回復検知手段とを有することによ
り、最優先順位の稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ
状態となった場合にはホストの切り替えを行い、最優先
順位でない稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態と
なった場合にはホストの切り替えを行わず、該業務処理
系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復した時にそれを認
識して閾値割れ状態を解除することにより、該業務処理
系よりも優先順位の高い稼働業務処理系の終了時にもホ
ストの切り替えを行うことなく業務を続行する。
As described above, the mutual standby system of this embodiment is a host having a plurality of business processing systems,
Each business processing system has a threshold value related to its processing capacity, and when the threshold value of the operating business processing system which is not the highest priority is the largest, the degeneracy recovery detection means of the processing capacity and the threshold management table of each business processing system By including the threshold management table reference means for each business processing system, the threshold cracked state detection means for each business processing system, and the threshold cracked state recovery detection means for each business processing system, the highest priority operational business processing system is provided. If the processing capacity of the above is in the threshold cracking state, the host is switched, and if the processing capacity of the operating task processing system that is not the highest priority is in the threshold cracking state, the host is not switched and the task processing is performed. When the processing capacity of the system recovers from the threshold value cracking state, it is recognized and the threshold value cracking state is canceled, and the host is switched even when the operating task processing system having a higher priority than the task processing system is terminated. To continue the business without.

【0016】[0016]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明の相互スタ
ンバイシステムは、複数の業務処理系を有するホスト
で、各業務処理系がそれぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を
有し、最優先順位でない稼働業務処理系の該閾値が最も
大きい場合に、最優先順位の稼働業務処理系の処理能力
が閾値割れ状態となった場合にはホストの切り替えを行
い、最優先順位でない稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値
割れ状態となった場合にはホストの切り替えを行わず、
該業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復した時
にそれを認識して閾値割れ状態を解除することにより、
該業務処理系よりも優先順位の高い稼働業務処理系の終
了時にもホストの切り替えを行うことなく業務を続行す
ることができるという効果を有している。
As described above, the mutual standby system of the present invention is a host having a plurality of business processing systems, and each business processing system has a threshold value relating to its processing capacity, and the operating business is not the highest priority. When the threshold of the processing system is the largest, and the processing capacity of the operating task processing system with the highest priority falls into the threshold cracking state, the host is switched, and the processing capacity of the operating task processing system not with the highest priority is If the threshold is broken, do not switch the host,
By recognizing it when the processing capacity of the business processing system recovers from the threshold value cracking state and canceling the threshold value cracking state,
This has the effect that the work can be continued without switching the host even when the active work processing system having a higher priority than the work processing system ends.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の相互スタンバイシステムの一実施例を
示すブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of a mutual standby system of the present invention.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1,2 ホスト 3 パス 11,12 稼働業務処理系 13,23 処理能力の縮退回復検知手段 14,24 閾値管理表 15,25 閾値管理表参照手段 16,26 閾値割れ状態検知手段 17,27 閾値割れ状態回復検知手段 21,22 待機業務処理系 31,32 グループ 41,42 優先順位 1, 2 Hosts 3 paths 11, 12 Operating work processing system 13, 23 Degradation recovery detection means for processing capacity 14, 24 Threshold management table 15, 25 Threshold management table reference means 16, 26 Threshold crack status detection means 17, 27 Threshold crack State recovery detection means 21,22 Standby task processing system 31,32 Group 41,42 Priority

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 【請求項1】 利用者が要求する処理を行っている稼働
業務処理系と、前記稼働業務処理系の障害時に業務を引
き継ぐ待機業務処理系とを一つのグループとし、各ホス
トにグループの異なる稼働業務処理系や待機業務処理系
を有し、それぞれの稼働業務を行いながらお互いに監視
し合い、他ホストが処理続行の不可能状態となった時に
は、処理続行の不可能状態となったホストの稼働業務処
理系と同一グループである自ホストの待機業務処理系に
業務を引き継ぐことにより、利用者には処理続行の不可
能状態とみえないようにする相互スタンバイシステムに
おいて、複数の業務処理系を有するホストで、各業務処
理系がそれぞれの処理能力に関する閾値を有し、最優先
順位でない稼働業務処理系の該閾値が最も大きい場合
に、 処理能力の縮退回復検知手段と、各業務処理系の
閾値管理表と、各業務処理系の閾値管理表参照手段と、
各業務処理系の閾値割れ状態検知手段と、各業務処理系
の閾値割れ状態回復検知手段とを有することにより、最
優先順位の稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態と
なった場合にはホストの切り替えを行い、最優先順位で
ない稼働業務処理系の処理能力が閾値割れ状態となった
場合にはホストの切り替えを行わず、該業務処理系の処
理能力が閾値割れ状態から回復した時にそれを認識して
閾値割れ状態を解除することにより、該業務処理系より
も優先順位の高い稼働業務処理系の終了時にもホストの
切り替えを行うことなく業務を続行する、ことを特徴と
する相互スタンバイシステム。
Claims: 1. An active business processing system that performs processing requested by a user and a standby business processing system that takes over the business in the event of a failure of the active business processing system are grouped into one group. Hosts have operating business processing systems and standby business processing systems in different groups, and monitor each other while performing each operating business, and when other hosts become unable to continue processing, processing cannot continue In a mutual standby system, which takes over the work to the standby work processing system of the local host that is in the same group as the running business processing system of the host in the status In a host that has a business processing system of, each business processing system has a threshold value related to its processing capacity, and the threshold value of the operating business processing system that is not the highest priority is the largest. A degenerate recovery detection means processing power, a threshold management table for each business processing system, a threshold management table reference means for each business processing system,
When the threshold value broken state detection means of each business processing system and the threshold value broken state recovery detection means of each business processing system are provided, when the processing capacity of the highest priority operating business processing system becomes the threshold value broken state. When the host is switched and the processing capacity of the operating processing system that is not the highest priority is in the threshold cracking state, the host is not switched, and when the processing capacity of the business processing system is recovered from the threshold breaking state By recognizing the above and canceling the threshold breached state, the mutual standby characterized by continuing the operation without switching the host even when the active business processing system having a higher priority than the business processing system ends system.
JP3157331A 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Mutual standby system Expired - Fee Related JP2666611B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3157331A JP2666611B2 (en) 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Mutual standby system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3157331A JP2666611B2 (en) 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Mutual standby system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH056288A true JPH056288A (en) 1993-01-14
JP2666611B2 JP2666611B2 (en) 1997-10-22

Family

ID=15647360

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP3157331A Expired - Fee Related JP2666611B2 (en) 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Mutual standby system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2666611B2 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01188977A (en) * 1988-01-22 1989-07-28 Nec Corp Job execution control system
JPH0341524A (en) * 1989-07-07 1991-02-22 Nec Corp Hot stand-by system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01188977A (en) * 1988-01-22 1989-07-28 Nec Corp Job execution control system
JPH0341524A (en) * 1989-07-07 1991-02-22 Nec Corp Hot stand-by system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2666611B2 (en) 1997-10-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6859889B2 (en) Backup system and method for distributed systems
US10764119B2 (en) Link handover method for service in storage system, and storage device
CN105302661A (en) System and method for implementing virtualization management platform high availability
JPH056288A (en) Mutual standby system
JP2003345620A (en) Process monitoring method for multi-node cluster system
CN100499387C (en) A method of singleboard N+1 backup in communication system
JP2503663B2 (en) Hot standby system
JP2513122B2 (en) Hot standby switching system
JPH03105632A (en) Mutual stand-by system
JP3085239B2 (en) Redundant system of basic processing unit
JP2013222310A (en) Task continuation method
JP2699599B2 (en) Dynamic switching control method for mutual standby system
JPH04181434A (en) Control system for separating device concerning throughput of information processing system at mutual standby system
JP2658683B2 (en) System stall monitoring and control method for mutual standby system
JPS6399653A (en) Fault recovery system for line adaptor
JPH09179792A (en) Recovering method for shared scsi device from fault
JP2630514B2 (en) Line switching method
JP2704137B2 (en) Current / spare switching method
JPH03278238A (en) Mutual hot stand-by system
JPH05165798A (en) System controlling system for two-series system
JP2871816B2 (en) Redundant system switching status monitoring method
JPH0628206A (en) Recovery system for fault in data processing station of cluster system
JPS628640A (en) Packet exchanging system
JP4747758B2 (en) Network equipment
JPH0250737A (en) Duplex system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 19970527

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080627

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090627

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100627

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100627

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110627

Year of fee payment: 14

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees