JPH05302451A - High damping building - Google Patents
High damping buildingInfo
- Publication number
- JPH05302451A JPH05302451A JP10655892A JP10655892A JPH05302451A JP H05302451 A JPH05302451 A JP H05302451A JP 10655892 A JP10655892 A JP 10655892A JP 10655892 A JP10655892 A JP 10655892A JP H05302451 A JPH05302451 A JP H05302451A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- damping
- building
- coefficient
- damping coefficient
- damping device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【０００１】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は高層建物の柱梁架構内に
設置したダンパーとしての減衰装置により、風や地震等
の振動外力に対し、高い減衰性を与えた高減衰建物に関
するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a high-damping building in which a damping device as a damper installed in a column-frame structure of a high-rise building provides a high damping property to a vibration external force such as wind or earthquake. ..
【０００２】[0002]
【従来の技術】出願人は構造物の柱梁架構内に、ブレー
スや壁等の形で可変剛性要素（耐震要素）を組み込み、
可変剛性要素自体の剛性、あるいは架構本体と可変剛性
要素との連結状態を可変とし、地震や風等の振動外力に
対し、振動外力の特性をコンピューターにより解析し
て、非共振となるよう構造物の剛性を変化させて構造物
の安全を図る能動型制震システム、可変剛性構造等を種
々提案している（例えば特開昭６２−２６８４７９号、
特開昭６３−１１４７７０号、特開昭６３−１１４７７
１号等）。2. Description of the Related Art The applicant has incorporated variable rigidity elements (seismic resistant elements) in the form of braces, walls, etc. in the column beam structure of a structure.
The rigidity of the variable stiffness element itself or the connection state between the frame body and the variable stiffness element is variable, and the characteristics of the vibration external force are analyzed by a computer against the vibration external force such as an earthquake or wind, and the structure is made non-resonant. Have proposed various active vibration control systems, variable rigidity structures, etc., which change the rigidity of the vehicle to ensure the safety of the structure (for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 268479/1987).
JP-A-63-114770, JP-A-63-11477
No. 1).
【０００３】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】従来の可変剛性要素を
組み込んだ形式の能動型制震システムは、主として地震
動等の卓越周期と、構造物の固有振動数との関係に着目
し、卓越周期に対し、構造物の固有振動数を能動的にず
らすことにより、共振現象を避け、応答量の低減を図っ
ている。The conventional active damping system of the type incorporating a variable stiffness element mainly focuses on the relationship between the predominant period such as earthquake motion and the natural frequency of the structure. On the other hand, by actively shifting the natural frequency of the structure, the resonance phenomenon is avoided and the response amount is reduced.
【０００４】しかし、能動型制震システムの場合、制御
用のコンピューターの他、駆動装置や、各種センサーを
用いるため、何らかの異常があった場合に対し、種々の
安全維持機構を必要とする等、制御機構が複雑となり、
コスト面での問題も考えられる。また、制御の遅れによ
り十分な効果を発揮するまで時間を要するような場合も
考えられる。However, in the case of an active vibration control system, in addition to a control computer, a driving device and various sensors are used, so that various safety maintenance mechanisms are required in case of any abnormality. The control mechanism becomes complicated,
There may be a cost problem. In addition, there may be a case where it takes time to exert a sufficient effect due to a control delay.
【０００５】これに対し、柱梁架構内にダンパーとして
の減衰装置を設置し、減衰装置の減衰係数ｃ（t/kine)
を適切な値に設定することで、建物の振動を低減する受
動型制振システムが構成される。On the other hand, a damping device as a damper is installed in the column / beam frame, and the damping coefficient c (t / kine) of the damping device is installed.
By setting to an appropriate value, a passive vibration control system that reduces the vibration of the building is constructed.
【０００６】この場合、振動低減の目標とする外力が地
震であるか、風外力であるかによって、最適な減衰係数
ｃの値が異なる。例えば、風による構造物の揺れは、日
常、頻繁に起こるものであり、特に高層建物等では固有
周期が長くなるため、風により長周期の大きな揺れが生
じやすく、船酔い現象の原因となっている。このような
風による建物の揺れは、建物の１次振動モードが支配的
であり、減衰装置に生じる速度と荷重の関係がほぼ線形
となるよう設定した場合において、減衰定数ｈが大きい
ほど、建物の応答が低減される。また、建物の剛性が大
きい（短周期）ほど、揺れは小さくなる。これに対し、
比較的規模の大きい地震を振動低減の目標と考えた場
合、最適な減衰係数ｃは、風外力に対する最適な減衰係
数ｃに比べ、小さい値となる。In this case, the optimum damping coefficient c differs depending on whether the target external force for vibration reduction is an earthquake or a wind external force. For example, swaying of structures due to wind is a frequent occurrence on a daily basis, and especially in high-rise buildings, where the natural period becomes long, large swaying of long periods is likely to occur due to wind, causing seasickness. There is. Such a sway of the building due to the wind is dominated by the primary vibration mode of the building, and in the case where the relationship between the speed and load generated in the damping device is set to be substantially linear, the larger the damping constant h, the larger the building constant. Response is reduced. Further, the greater the rigidity of the building (shorter period), the smaller the shaking. In contrast,
When considering a comparatively large-scale earthquake as a target for vibration reduction, the optimum damping coefficient c has a smaller value than the optimum damping coefficient c for the wind external force.
【０００７】一方、これらの外力に対し、最適な減衰係
数ｃを与えようとする場合、従来、種々の用途で用いら
れている一般的なダンパーでは、減衰係数が小さく、建
物における最適な減衰係数ｃを実現するためには、装置
の数が多くなり過ぎ、建物の設計が困難となるという問
題がある。特に、風振動の低減を目的として、建物の剛
性が大きく、１次固有周期が短くなる範囲に減衰係数ｃ
を設定しようとすると、通常、最適減衰係数ｃがかなり
大きな値となるため、装置の設計やその配置に関する設
計が困難となる場合が多い。本発明はコンピュータープ
ログラム等による制御システムを必要としない受動型の
制震システムにおいて、減衰装置の配置を工夫すること
で、上述のような問題点の解決を図ったものである。On the other hand, when an optimum damping coefficient c is given to these external forces, a general damper conventionally used for various purposes has a small damping coefficient, and the optimum damping coefficient in a building is required. In order to realize c, there is a problem that the number of devices becomes too large, which makes it difficult to design a building. In particular, for the purpose of reducing wind vibration, the damping coefficient c is set in a range where the rigidity of the building is high and the primary natural period is short.
In general, the optimum damping coefficient c has a considerably large value, so that it is often difficult to design the device and the layout thereof. The present invention intends to solve the above-mentioned problems by devising the arrangement of a damping device in a passive vibration control system that does not require a control system based on a computer program or the like.
【０００８】[0008]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の高減衰建物は受
動型の制震システムを構成するものであり、多層階の建
物の柱梁架構に対し、複数層にわたる耐震要素を設け、
柱梁架構と耐震要素間、または耐震要素の中間に、所定
の減衰係数を有するダンパーとしての減衰装置を介在さ
せ、建物内に設置した複数の減衰装置により建物に所定
の減衰定数ｈを与え、風振動や地震動に対し、建物の応
答を効果的に低減させるものである。The highly damped building of the present invention constitutes a passive damping system, in which a multi-story building is provided with seismic resistant elements over a plurality of layers.
A damping device as a damper having a predetermined damping coefficient is interposed between the column-beam structure and the seismic resistant element or in the middle of the seismic resistant element, and a predetermined damping constant h is given to the building by a plurality of damping devices installed in the building, It effectively reduces the response of the building to wind vibrations and earthquake motions.
【０００９】複数層にわたる耐震要素の形式としては、
例えば２層以上を通して逆Ｖ形に設けたブレースや、連
続する２層の上層階のＶ形ブレースと下層階の逆Ｖ型ブ
レースとを減衰装置を介してＸ形に連結したもの等が考
えられる。As the form of the seismic resistant element over a plurality of layers,
For example, a brace provided in an inverted V shape through two or more layers, or a structure in which two consecutive V-shaped braces on the upper floor and an inverted V-shaped brace on the lower floor are connected to each other through an attenuator in an X shape can be considered. ..
【００１０】[0010]
【実施例】以下、実施例として、本発明の高減衰建物に
おける減衰装置の配置及びその減衰特性を、各層ごと配
置した場合と比較しながら説明する。EXAMPLES As examples, the arrangement of the damping device and the damping characteristics thereof in the high damping building of the present invention will be described in comparison with the case where each layer is arranged.
【００１１】図３は比較例として各層ごと減衰装置１０
を配置した場合の建物架構１を概略的に示したもので、
各層の柱梁架構内に逆Ｖ形ブレース４を配置し、ブレー
ス４の頂部と上側の梁３を減衰装置１０を介して連結し
た場合である。図４(a) はこれを解析モデルの形で示し
たもので、図中、各層の重量ｍi ＝ｍ、耐震要素として
のブレースの剛性ｋi ＝ｋ、減衰装置による各層の減衰
係数ｃi ＝ｃとしている。FIG. 3 shows a damping device 10 for each layer as a comparative example.
Is a schematic view of the building frame 1 when the
This is a case where the inverted V-shaped brace 4 is arranged in the column-beam frame of each layer, and the top portion of the brace 4 and the upper beam 3 are connected via the damping device 10. FIG. 4 (a) shows this in the form of an analytical model. In the figure, the weight of each layer m i = m, the rigidity of the brace as an earthquake-resistant element k i = k, and the damping coefficient c i of each layer by the damping device. = C.
【００１２】図１は本発明の一実施例における耐震要素
及び減衰装置の配置例を示したもので、耐震要素とし
て、２層を通した逆Ｖ形ブレース５を設置し、１層おき
に設置した減衰装置１０でブレース５の頂部と梁３を連
結した場合である。FIG. 1 shows an example of arrangement of seismic resistant elements and damping devices in one embodiment of the present invention. As seismic resistant elements, inverted V-shaped braces 5 through two layers are installed and every other layer is installed. This is the case where the top of the brace 5 and the beam 3 are connected by the damping device 10 described above.
【００１３】図２は本発明の他の実施例における耐震要
素及び減衰装置の配置例を示したもので、耐震要素とし
て、連続する２層の上層階にＶ形ブレース６を、下層階
に逆Ｖ型ブレース７を設置し、これらの頂部どうしを減
衰装置１０で連結することにより、２層に跨がるＸ形の
耐震要素を構成した場合である。FIG. 2 shows an arrangement example of seismic resistant elements and damping devices according to another embodiment of the present invention. As seismic resistant elements, a V-shaped brace 6 is provided on two consecutive upper floors, and an inverted V-shaped brace 6 is provided on the lower floor. This is a case where the V-shaped brace 7 is installed and the tops thereof are connected by the damping device 10 to form an X-shaped seismic resistant element that straddles two layers.
【００１４】図４(b) は図１、図２に対応する解析モデ
ル図であり、図４(b) の場合は、各ブレースの剛性をｋ
としている。また、図４(c) も図１、図２に対応する解
析モデル図であり、図４(c) の場合は各ブレースの剛性
をｋ／２とおいている。FIG. 4B is an analytical model diagram corresponding to FIGS. 1 and 2. In the case of FIG. 4B, the rigidity of each brace is represented by k.
I am trying. Further, FIG. 4 (c) is also an analytical model diagram corresponding to FIGS. 1 and 2, and in the case of FIG. 4 (c), the rigidity of each brace is set to k / 2.
【００１５】図５は図４(a) 〜(c) の解析モデルに対す
る複素固有値解析結果を示したもので、縦軸には減衰固
有周期Ｔ（秒）と建物全体の減衰定数ｈ（％）をとり、
横軸に１層分の減衰装置の減衰係数ｃ（t/kine) をとっ
ている。FIG. 5 shows the complex eigenvalue analysis results for the analytical models of FIGS. 4 (a) to 4 (c), where the vertical axis represents the damping natural period T (seconds) and the damping constant h (%) of the entire building. Take
The horizontal axis represents the damping coefficient c (t / kine) of the damping device for one layer.
【００１６】図５のグラフにおいて、破線が図４(a) の
比較例の場合であり、ａ（Ｔ1 ）の曲線で示されるよう
に、減衰係数ｃが増大するに従って、建物の固有周期
（このグラフでは１次固有周期のみ示している）が短く
なっている。風振動を対象とする場合には、減衰係数ｃ
を建物の剛性が大きく、短い周期で安定する範囲に設定
することで、効果的な制振が図れる。また、ａ
（ｈ1 ）、ａ（ｈ2 ）、ａ（ｈ3）の曲線はそれぞれ図
４(a) の比較例における１層分の減衰係数ｃと１〜３次
の減衰定数ｈ1 〜ｈ3 の関係を示したものである。地震
動に対しては、減衰係数ｃを、これら１〜３次の減衰定
数ｈ1 〜ｈ3 が大きくなる範囲に設定することで、減衰
性の高い振動抑制効果が得られる。In the graph of FIG. 5, the broken line represents the case of the comparative example of FIG. 4 (a), and as shown by the curve of a (T 1 ), as the damping coefficient c increases, the natural period of the building ( In this graph, only the first natural period is shown). When targeting wind vibration, the damping coefficient c
The effective vibration control can be achieved by setting to the range in which the rigidity of the building is large and stable in a short cycle. Also, a
(H 1), a (h 2), a (h 3) of each curve 4 1-3 primary and damping coefficient c of one layer in the comparative example (a) of the damping constant h 1 to h 3 It shows the relationship. For ground motion, the damping coefficient c, by setting the range of these 1-3 order decay constant h 1 to h 3 is increased, a high damping vibration suppression effect is obtained.
【００１７】図４(a) の比較例における減衰特性に対
し、剛性ｋはそのままで、２層にわたるブレース５（ま
たは６及び７）を設け、減衰装置を１層おきの配置とし
た図４(b) の実施例では、ｂ（Ｔ1 ）の曲線で示される
ように、１次固有周期の変化が減衰係数の変化に対して
敏感になり、周期変化が急峻となる。従って、ａ
（Ｔ1）の曲線との比較でも明らかなように、減衰係数
ｃの選択範囲を絞ることができ、かつより小さい減衰係
数で短い周期側に安定するため、減衰装置に生じる減衰
力を小さくすることができ、設計が容易となる。あるい
は、減衰装置の設置数を減らすことで、建物架構の設計
が容易となる。With respect to the damping characteristics in the comparative example of FIG. 4 (a), the brace 5 (or 6 and 7) extending over two layers is provided while the rigidity k remains unchanged, and the damping devices are arranged every other layer. In the example of b), as shown by the curve of b (T 1 ), the change of the primary natural period becomes sensitive to the change of the damping coefficient, and the period change becomes sharp. Therefore, a
As is clear from comparison with the curve of (T 1 ), the selection range of the damping coefficient c can be narrowed down, and the damping force generated in the damping device can be reduced because the damping coefficient c stabilizes on the short cycle side with a smaller damping coefficient. And the design is easy. Alternatively, reducing the number of installed damping devices facilitates the design of the building frame.
【００１８】また、ｂ（ｈ1 ）の曲線は、減衰係数ｃと
１次減衰定数ｈ1 の関係を示したもので、曲線ａ
（ｈ1 ）との比較で明らかなように、より小さい減衰係
数でピークに達し、かつピークの近傍ではより大きな減
衰定数が得られる。従って、地震動に対しても、風振動
の場合と同様、減衰装置の設計が容易で、減衰装置の設
置数を減少させることができるとともに、建物に高い減
衰性を与えることができる。The curve b (h 1 ) shows the relationship between the damping coefficient c and the first-order damping constant h 1.
As is clear from the comparison with (h 1 ), the peak is reached with a smaller damping coefficient, and a larger damping constant is obtained near the peak. Therefore, even with respect to seismic motion, the design of the damping device is easy as in the case of wind vibration, the number of installed damping devices can be reduced, and a high damping property can be given to the building.
【００１９】図４(b) の実施例に対し、ブレース５（ま
たは６及び７）の剛性を１／２にした図４(c) の実施例
の場合、曲線ｃ（Ｔ1 ）とｂ（Ｔ1 ）、及び曲線ｃ（ｈ
1 ）とｂ（ｈ1 ）の比較で明らかなように、周期変化の
急峻性やピークにおける１次減衰定数ｈ1 の値では劣る
ものの、１次固有周期が短い周期に移行する点、及び１
次減衰定数ｈ1 のピークを与える減衰係数が、図４(b)
の実施例に比べてより小さい値となるため、減衰装置自
体の機構やその配置等に関する設計に関しては有利とな
る。また、振動を抑制するための最適な減衰係数がより
小さくなることで、風振動に対する最適減衰係数と、地
震動に対する最適減衰係数の差も小さくなり、両者に対
処させるのが容易となる。In the case of the embodiment of FIG. 4 (c) in which the rigidity of the brace 5 (or 6 and 7) is halved compared to the embodiment of FIG. 4 (b), the curves c (T 1 ) and b ( T 1 ) and the curve c (h
As is clear from the comparison between 1 ) and b (h 1 ), although the steepness of the period change and the value of the first-order damping constant h 1 at the peak are inferior, the 1st natural period shifts to a shorter period, and 1
The damping coefficient that gives the peak of the next damping coefficient h 1 is shown in Fig. 4 (b).
Since the value is smaller than that of the embodiment, it is advantageous for the design of the mechanism of the damping device itself and its arrangement. Further, since the optimum damping coefficient for suppressing the vibration becomes smaller, the difference between the optimum damping coefficient for the wind vibration and the optimum damping coefficient for the seismic motion also becomes smaller, and it becomes easy to deal with both.
【００２０】本発明で使用する減衰装置は装置部に生じ
る荷重Ｆと速度Ｖの関係が線形に近くなる特性を有する
装置であり、構造物にとって最適となる減衰係数（Ｆ／
Ｖ〔t/kine〕) を実現できるものであれば、特に限定さ
れない。例えば、図６に概念的に示すように、シリンダ
ー１１とピストン１２及び比例弁等の調圧弁１３で構成
されたオイルダンパーが使用できる。この場合、シリン
ダー１１がブレース等の耐震要素側に連結され、シリン
ダー１１内で往復動する両ロッド形式のピストン１２が
柱梁架構側に連結され、調圧弁１３の開度の調節により
所定の減衰係数が得られる。The damping device used in the present invention is a device having a characteristic that the relationship between the load F generated in the device part and the speed V is almost linear, and the damping coefficient (F / F /
There is no particular limitation so long as it can realize V [t / kine]). For example, as conceptually shown in FIG. 6, an oil damper including a cylinder 11, a piston 12, and a pressure regulating valve 13 such as a proportional valve can be used. In this case, the cylinder 11 is connected to the seismic resistant element such as a brace, the double rod type piston 12 that reciprocates in the cylinder 11 is connected to the column beam structure side, and a predetermined damping is achieved by adjusting the opening of the pressure regulating valve 13. The coefficient is obtained.
【００２１】図７は減衰装置１０の一例をより具体的に
示したもので、基本構造は図６の概念図に示される通り
であり、シリンダー１１内に両ロッド形式のピストン１
２が組み込まれている。ただし、ロッド１２ａは一方向
のみシリンダー１１から突出し、その突出部分及び反対
側のシリンダー１１の外面に、耐震要素または柱梁架構
と連結するための取付部１５、１６を設けている。FIG. 7 shows one example of the damping device 10 more concretely. The basic structure is as shown in the conceptual diagram of FIG.
2 is incorporated. However, the rod 12a projects from the cylinder 11 only in one direction, and the projecting portion and the outer surface of the cylinder 11 on the opposite side are provided with mounting portions 15 and 16 for coupling with a seismic element or a beam structure.
【００２２】高減衰、高剛性を確保するための条件とし
ては、まずピストン１２移動方向と反対側の油圧室１４
を負圧としないことが必要で、そのためピストン１２を
貫通する流路に調圧弁１７ａ、１７ｂを設け、移動油量
が直接的に反対側の油圧室１４へ流れる構造としてい
る。また、作動中の油の圧縮を考慮して不足油量を補償
する必要があるので、補給用のアキュムレーター１８が
必要となり、アキュムレーター１８を設けたバイパス１
９にはチェック弁２０ａ、２０ｂを設けている。さらに
停止すると、油が元の状態に戻る（膨張）ので、補償さ
れた油をアキュムレーター１８に戻す必要があり、チェ
ック弁２０ａ、２０ｂと並列にオリフィス（絞り）２１
ａ、２１ｂを設けている。As a condition for ensuring high damping and high rigidity, first, the hydraulic chamber 14 on the side opposite to the moving direction of the piston 12 is used.
Is not required to be a negative pressure. Therefore, pressure control valves 17a and 17b are provided in the flow path that penetrates the piston 12 so that the moving oil amount directly flows to the hydraulic chamber 14 on the opposite side. Further, since it is necessary to compensate for the insufficient oil amount in consideration of the compression of the operating oil, the replenishment accumulator 18 is required, and the bypass 1 provided with the accumulator 18 is required.
9 is provided with check valves 20a and 20b. Further stop causes the oil to return to its original state (expansion), so it is necessary to return the compensated oil to the accumulator 18, and the orifice (throttle) 21 in parallel with the check valves 20a and 20b.
a and 21b are provided.
【００２３】[0023]
【発明の効果】 各層ごとに耐震要素を設け、減衰装置で連結する場
合に比べ、より小さな減衰係数で１次減衰定数のピーク
に達し、かつより大きな減衰定数が得られる。EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION Compared to the case where a seismic resistant element is provided for each layer and connected by a damping device, the peak of the primary damping constant is reached with a smaller damping coefficient, and a larger damping constant is obtained.
【００２４】 １次固有周期の変化が減衰係数の変化
に対して敏感になり、周期変化が急峻となる。The change in the primary natural period becomes sensitive to the change in the damping coefficient, and the period change becomes sharp.
【００２５】 、より、小さい減衰係数で大きな
減衰性、振動低減効果が得られるため、減衰装置の設計
が容易となり、また減衰装置の数を減らすことができ、
建物架構への減衰装置の配置に関する設計も容易とな
る。Since a large damping property and a vibration reducing effect can be obtained with a smaller damping coefficient, the design of the damping device can be facilitated, and the number of damping devices can be reduced.
It also facilitates the design of the placement of damping devices in the building frame.
【００２６】 風振動に対する応答低減に最適な減衰
係数と、比較的規模の大きい地震動に対する応答低減に
最適な減衰係数との差も小さくなるため、両者、それぞ
れに対し振動低減を図る場合にも有利である。The difference between the optimum damping coefficient for reducing the response to wind vibrations and the optimum damping coefficient for reducing the response to a relatively large-scale earthquake motion is small, which is also advantageous when reducing vibrations for both of them. Is.
【図１】本発明の一実施例における耐震要素及び減衰装
置の配置例を示す建物架構の概要図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a building frame showing an arrangement example of a seismic element and a damping device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
【図２】本発明の他の実施例における耐震要素及び減衰
装置の配置例を示す建物架構の概要図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a building frame showing an arrangement example of seismic resistant elements and damping devices according to another embodiment of the present invention.
【図３】比較例として各層ごと減衰装置を配置した場合
の建物架構の概要図である。FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a building frame in which a damping device is arranged for each layer as a comparative example.
【図４】(a) は比較例としての各層ごと減衰装置を設け
た場合の解析モデル図、(b) 、(c) は本発明の高減衰建
物における減衰装置の配置例に対応する解析モデル図で
あり、(c) は耐震要素としてのブレースの断面剛性を１
／２とした場合である。FIG. 4 (a) is an analysis model diagram when a damping device is provided for each layer as a comparative example, and (b) and (c) are analysis models corresponding to an example of arrangement of damping devices in a high damping building of the present invention. Figure (c) shows the cross-sectional rigidity of the brace as a seismic element, which is 1
/ 2.
【図５】図４(a) 〜(c) の解析モデルに対する複素固有
値解析結果を示すグラフである。FIG. 5 is a graph showing the complex eigenvalue analysis results for the analytical models of FIGS. 4 (a) to 4 (c).
【図６】本発明で用いる減衰装置を概念的に示した断面
図である。FIG. 6 is a sectional view conceptually showing a damping device used in the present invention.
【図７】本発明で用いる減衰装置の一例を示す装置全体
の概略説明図である。FIG. 7 is a schematic explanatory diagram of the entire device showing an example of the damping device used in the present invention.
１…建物架構、２…柱、３…梁、４〜７…ブレース １０…減衰装置、１１…シリンダー、１２…ピストン、
１４…油圧室、１５…取付部、１７…調圧弁1 ... Building frame, 2 ... Pillar, 3 ... Beam, 4-7 ... Brace 10 ... Damping device, 11 ... Cylinder, 12 ... Piston,
14 ... Hydraulic chamber, 15 ... Mounting part, 17 ... Pressure regulating valve
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 丹羽 直幹 東京都港区元赤坂１丁目２番７号 鹿島建 設株式会社内 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continued Front Page (72) Inventor Naoki Niwa 1-2-7 Moto-Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo Kashima Construction Co., Ltd.
Claims (3)
にわたる耐震要素を設け、前記柱梁架構と前記耐震要素
間、または前記耐震要素の中間に、所定の減衰係数を有
するダンパーとしての減衰装置を介在させ、前記建物内
に設置した複数の減衰装置により該建物に所定の減衰係
数を与えたことを特徴とする高減衰建物。1. A damper having a predetermined damping coefficient between the column-beam frame and the earthquake-proof element or between the column-beam frame and the earthquake-proof element for a column-beam frame of a multi-story building. A high-damping building characterized in that a predetermined damping coefficient is given to the building by a plurality of damping devices installed in the building with the damping device of (1) interposed.
に設けたブレースである請求項１記載の高減衰建物。2. The high damping building according to claim 1, wherein the seismic resistant element is a brace provided in an inverted V shape through two or more layers.
Ｖ形ブレースと下層階の逆Ｖ型ブレースとを減衰装置を
介してＸ形に連結したものである請求項１記載の高減衰
建物。3. The high-damping element according to claim 1, wherein the seismic resistant element is formed by connecting two consecutive V-shaped braces on the upper floor and an inverted V-shaped brace on the lower floor in an X-shape through a damping device. building.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4106558A JP2600559B2 (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1992-04-24 | High attenuation building |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4106558A JP2600559B2 (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1992-04-24 | High attenuation building |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH05302451A true JPH05302451A (en) | 1993-11-16 |
| JP2600559B2 JP2600559B2 (en) | 1997-04-16 |
Family
ID=14436655
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4106558A Expired - Fee Related JP2600559B2 (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1992-04-24 | High attenuation building |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2600559B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5819484A (en) * | 1995-07-28 | 1998-10-13 | Kar; Ramapada | Building structure with friction based supplementary damping in its bracing system for dissipating seismic energy |
| JP2011058175A (en) * | 2009-09-07 | 2011-03-24 | Shimizu Corp | Seismic control structure |
| JP2020094388A (en) * | 2018-12-12 | 2020-06-18 | 清水建設株式会社 | Architectural structure |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH02261171A (en) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-23 | Kajima Corp | Damping applying device for earthquake-proof structure |
-
1992
- 1992-04-24 JP JP4106558A patent/JP2600559B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH02261171A (en) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-23 | Kajima Corp | Damping applying device for earthquake-proof structure |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5819484A (en) * | 1995-07-28 | 1998-10-13 | Kar; Ramapada | Building structure with friction based supplementary damping in its bracing system for dissipating seismic energy |
| JP2011058175A (en) * | 2009-09-07 | 2011-03-24 | Shimizu Corp | Seismic control structure |
| JP2020094388A (en) * | 2018-12-12 | 2020-06-18 | 清水建設株式会社 | Architectural structure |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2600559B2 (en) | 1997-04-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5265387A (en) | Vibration suppressing structure | |
| JP2528589B2 (en) | High damping system for damping structures with multi-linear damping coefficient | |
| JPH05302451A (en) | High damping building | |
| JP2513358B2 (en) | Active damping system using cylinder-locking device | |
| JP2842159B2 (en) | Bending deformation control type vibration control structure | |
| JP2001152695A (en) | Three-storied house | |
| JP2528573B2 (en) | High damping device for vibration control structures | |
| JP2616334B2 (en) | High damping structure for control of column axial deformation | |
| JP2601070B2 (en) | High damping structure | |
| JP3248684B2 (en) | Damping structure | |
| JP2513356B2 (en) | High damping structure | |
| JPH08277650A (en) | Bending deformation control type vibration damping structure | |
| JP2541073B2 (en) | Vibration control method for structures | |
| JPH0742723B2 (en) | Damping method for structure and damping device using damping device | |
| JPH04277273A (en) | Damping structure | |
| JP2940223B2 (en) | Active damping bridge | |
| JP2541065B2 (en) | High damping structure for wind response control | |
| JP3228180B2 (en) | Damping structure | |
| JPH04272371A (en) | Vibration controlling structure | |
| JP2526660B2 (en) | High damping addition device for structures | |
| JPH0860895A (en) | Bending-deflection control type earthquake control frame | |
| JP2528563B2 (en) | High damping device for vibration control structures | |
| JP3156061B2 (en) | High-rise building damping structure | |
| JPH0742735B2 (en) | Vibration control frame with bending deformation control mechanism | |
| JP2663835B2 (en) | Compound control type vibration control structure |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 19961119 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |