JPH042451A - Control unit for progress of work - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To prepare a practical progress control list, by selecting the person having the highest execution ability selectable at the time when selecting a person in charge for a certain process and selecting the process where the execution ability can be displayed most when the process is selected for a certain person in charge. CONSTITUTION:A process information and charging ability information are input by an initial data input means 1 and the schedulings of each process are performed by a scheduling mean 4. Now, the person having ability most among the persons in charge who can undertake a certain process is allocated as the person in charge of the process thereof and the person in charge thereof is allocated for the process where the ability can be displayed most among the processes where the person in charge can undertake in the selection of the process. Also, the data of the start, completion, etc., of each processes are input to the scheduling mean 4 from an actual result data input mean 6 and an ability renewing mean 7 renews the ability information on each processes of each persons in charge.

Description

[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Object of the Invention] (Industrial Application Field) The present invention is a work progress management device that divides a predetermined work into processes and creates and manages a progress management table for managing the processes. Regarding.

(Prior Art) Conventionally, progress management tables for managing tasks such as design and manufacturing were scheduled based on the experience of the project leader or the person in charge of the project, and were created by hand or using a word processor, etc. Ta.

(Problem to be solved by the invention) For this reason, it took time to adjust the context of each process, and the number of man-hours for each process was all set at standard values without taking into account the ability of the person in charge. As a result, it was difficult to accurately represent the critical path in the progress management table, causing problems such as process delays.

The present invention was made in view of these circumstances, and
It is an object of the present invention to provide a work progress management device that reduces the burden on a progress management table creator and creates and manages a practical progress management table.

[Configuration of the Invention (Means for Solving the Problems) In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides information on each step constituting a predetermined business, the standard time of the step, and the context of each step. , a work progress management system that creates and manages a progress management table for managing the progress of each process using performance information of the person in charge of each process. When determining the person in charge of a process, select the person who has the highest ability to carry out the process among the people who can be in charge at the time of the start of the process, and when deciding which process a person will be in charge of for multiple processes. The person in charge is in charge of the process in which the person in charge can best demonstrate his or her ability to perform.

In other words, information on the ability of each person in charge of each process is created, and when determining the person in charge of each process, the person who has the highest ability to perform that process among the people who can be in charge at the time of the start of that process is selected. Similarly, when deciding which processes a person will be responsible for, we ensure that the person in charge is responsible for the process in which they can best demonstrate their ability to perform.

(Function) When each person is in charge of multiple processes and the processes are carried out, at the start of work, it is normal for the person with the highest ability to carry out that process to be selected for each process. When a process finishes and moves on to the next process, the person who finishes first and has the longest waiting time is often assigned the task.

In contrast, in the present invention, regardless of whether there is a person who has been waiting for a long time or a person who has just finished, the person who has the highest ability to carry out the next process among them is assigned as the person in charge of the next process.

In addition, when deciding which process a person will be responsible for, that person will be assigned to the process where they can best demonstrate their ability to perform, ensuring that the process progresses as planned or is further improved, ensuring that the work is carried out reliably. be able to.

(Example) An example of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. 1 to 4.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a business progress management device according to an embodiment. This work progress management device includes an initial data input means 1 for inputting each work process, the standard time of the process, context information of each process, and the execution ability of the person in charge of each process, and from this initial data input means 1. A process information memory 2 stores process information consisting of each input process, standard time of the process, and context information of each process, and personnel ability information consisting of the execution ability of the person in charge of each process. Person in charge ability information memory 3, process information memory 2. A scheduling means 4 that creates and manages a work progress management table based on the information in the staff ability information memory 3; a progress management table data memory 5 that stores the management table data created by the scheduling means 4; The actual performance ability of each person in charge is determined from the output of the performance data input means 6 which inputs the performance data of the person in charge into the scheduling means 4 and the scheduling means 4 which performs progress management based on this performance data. ability updating means 8 for updating the stored contents of the person-in-charge ability information memory 3;
It is comprised of a printer 8 for recording the progress management table created by the scheduling means 4 and the ability data updated by the ability updating means 7.

Next, the operation of the business progress management device configured as described above will be explained.

First, process information and responsible ability information are input through the initial data input means 1, and the scheduling means 4 schedules each process. I will explain using Second
The figure is a management table that determines the order of implementation of each process and manages the progress of this process.

In FIG. 2(a), when steps 1 to 4 are completed, steps 5 to 4 are completed.
8 is started, but among the remaining steps 5 to 8, the earliest time t1 can be started judging from the context information of the steps.
seek. In this case, time 1 is the start time of step 5. The time t1 obtained in this manner is determined only from the context of the process, and it does not necessarily mean that there is a person in charge who can start the process (process 5) at that time.

Next, process information memory 2. Using the standard working time of the process and the ability information of the person in charge stored in the person in charge ability information memory 3, the completion time of the process (Process 1) that has been completed the earliest to date among all the people in charge. Find t2. The time t2 obtained in this way is determined only from the completion of the process by each person in charge, and it does not necessarily mean that there is a process that can be started at that time.

From another perspective, this means that at least time t1 and time t2
This means that both the process that can be started and the person in charge of it exist at the point when the process has passed. Therefore, time t1 and time t
2, and if time t is equal to or greater than time t2 (1+≧t2), there is at least a person in charge who can start the process after time t, so the process is started at time t1. Person in charge who can start the process (process 1゜2
．． Assign the most capable person among the persons in charge of step 4 as the person in charge of that process.

Conversely, as shown in FIG. 2(b), time t1 becomes time t2.
If it is smaller (t+<i2), after time t2, at least the person in charge (the person in charge of process 1 that ended at time t2) will be able to start the process that the person in charge can start at time t2 (process 5, 7) Assign the person in charge to the process where they can best demonstrate their abilities.

These processes are repeated until there are no more processes for which a person in charge has not been determined, and a progress management table is output from the printer 8. Also, start each process.

Data such as completion is input to the scheduling means 4 from the performance data input means 6 and processed. Using this data, the ability updating means 7 calculates the scheduled work time and actual work obtained from the standard work time and ability information of each process. The ability information for each process of each person in charge is updated using the relational expression shown below from the time, the stored contents of the person in charge ability information memory 3 are updated, and the printer 8
It is also output to the person in charge's ability when creating the next progress management table.

P, ++ -f (P,,Y,J) ---(1)P
ail: Next ability information for a certain process of a certain person in charge Po: Current ability information for a certain process of a certain person in charge Y 2 Current scheduled work time for a certain process of a certain person in charge J: A certain person in charge The current work performance time for the process or f (P, , Y, J) is a capability evaluation function, and is a function that determines the proportion of the current performance to be reflected in the next capability information. This function is set by the users of this device to suit the nature of the project they are in charge of.

Next, explanation will be given using specific data. 1 to 6 in the process
The standard working times T1 to T6 are as follows.

KI K2 K3 K4 K5 K6TI
T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 In addition, the context information of the process is as follows.

(Kl can start unconditionally) K2-K 1 (K2 can start when 1 is completed) 3-KI CK3 can start when 1 is completed) K4-1 (K4 can start when 1 is completed) ) K5- to 20
RK3 (K5 can be started if at least either K2 or 3 is completed) K6-4 AND K5 CK6 can be started if both K4 and 3 are completed) The above relationship is shown in Figure 3. Shown below.

The ability information for the processes 1 to 6 of the person in charge of M1 and M2 is as follows: 1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6Ml
1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0M2
1.2 1.0 1. (11,00°81,2 Here, 0.8 means that the corresponding process is completed in 80% of the standard working time.

A progress management table is created from the above data according to the flowchart shown in FIG. First, in S (step) 0, all processes (6 in Kl~) remain, so judging from the context information of each process, the time t when it can be started
When calculating -, K1 can be started unconditionally, so time tt+''=0, and K2., 3 and 4 cannot be calculated because 1 has not yet appeared in the progress management table. Therefore, time i ,,woo9 time i,,smo
o1 time i, 4woo. Also about 5 and 2
．． 3 does not appear in the progress management table, so time tk5-
■It becomes 4. for K6 as well. 5. Since has not yet appeared in the progress management table, time j, 6sa (Kl).

And the earliest time t among these times tk1 to tk6
1, it is found that K1 can start at time t1-0.

Next, in step 81, when determining the time tMfi for each person in charge to complete all processes to date based on the progress management table, both Ml and M2 find that no processes have appeared in the progress management table yet. Since it is possible to start immediately, the time tM is -0 and the time tM2 is 0, respectively. Then, when finding the earliest time t2 among these times tMl to tM2, it is found that both Ml and M2 have completed their processes up to the present at time t2-0 (in fact, there are no processes up to the present). I understand.

Then, as a result of comparing time t1 and time t2 in S2, time t1 is equal to or greater than time t2 (1+≧
t2) Since the condition is satisfied, proceed to S3.

In S3, the person in charge who can start work 1 at time t1 is Ml.
and M2, so looking at the ability information for each person in charge of 1, M1 is 1.0 and M2 is 1.2. That is, the person in charge of 1 at time t is Ml, and in this process, the optimal person for 1 is determined to be Ml, and this is expressed in the progress management table. If time t1 is smaller than time t2 in S2, the process advances to S4. In S4, time t2
If the processes that M can start at are Km and Kn, then Ml
Looking at the capability information for KIII and Kn, it is determined that the process with the smallest capacity is the one in which Ml can demonstrate its capabilities the most among the processes that Ml can start at time t2, and that Mn should be in charge of that process in this process. Determine the process to be optimal and express it in a progress management table. The relational expression for calculating the scheduled work time is as follows.

(Scheduled work time) - (Standard work time) × (Ability information of the person in charge for that process)...
(2) Using this formula (2) to find the scheduled work time for 1 in Ml, (scheduled work time for 1 in Ml) - T I Xl
, 0-'T I (3). In the same manner, all processes are scheduled and a progress management table is created. Then, enter the actual work time for each process,
The ability information of the person in charge is updated based on the scheduled work time and actual work time. In this embodiment, the following function is adopted as the function f (Pn, Y, J).

For example, if K1's actual work time is 0.8XT1, the next ability information for M1's 1 will be as follows.

(Next ability information about Ml 1) -0,98・
... (5) Other ability information will be updated in the same manner below.

In this way, in this example, the conditions for starting a certain process depend on the completion of the previous process, and each person in charge has different abilities for each process, and their abilities change. Based on this information, we select the most suitable person for a certain process and assign it as the person in charge.We also update the ability information of each person in charge for each process based on the current work performance to update the ability information for each process for the next time. This can be reflected when creating a progress management table, allowing for appropriate progress management.

[Effects of the Invention] As explained above, according to the work progress management device of the present invention, when selecting a person in charge of a certain process, the person with the highest ability to perform the process selectable at that time is selected, When choosing a process for a person in charge, I chose the process in which that person can best demonstrate their ability to perform.
Able to appropriately manage progress.

[BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS] The figure shows a work progress management device according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the schematic configuration of the embodiment device, and FIG. Figure 3 is a diagram explaining the context information of the process, and Figure 4 is the operation. This is a flowchart. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1... Initial data input means, 2... Process information memory, 3... Person in charge ability information memory, 4... Scheduling means, 5... Progress management table data memory, 6...
- Achievement data input means, 7... Ability update means, 8...
・Printer. Applicant's agent Patent attorney Takehiko Suzue (a) Figure 2

Claims (1)

[Scope of Claims] The progress of each process is managed using each process that constitutes a predetermined work, the standard time of that process, the context information of each process, and the execution ability information of the person in charge of each process. In a work progress management system that creates and manages a progress management table, when deciding who is in charge of a certain process from among multiple people, it is necessary to select the person in charge of that process from among those who are available at the start of the process. The person in charge is the person who has the highest ability to carry out the process among the people involved in the process, and when deciding which process to be in charge of for multiple processes, the person in charge is in charge of the process where the person in charge can best demonstrate their ability to perform. A business progress management device.