JPH04158480A - Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit - Google Patents

Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit

Info

Publication number
JPH04158480A
JPH04158480A JP2284840A JP28484090A JPH04158480A JP H04158480 A JPH04158480 A JP H04158480A JP 2284840 A JP2284840 A JP 2284840A JP 28484090 A JP28484090 A JP 28484090A JP H04158480 A JPH04158480 A JP H04158480A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pairs
transition table
sequential circuit
information
pair
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2284840A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Shigeki Sakai
堺 茂樹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Corp
Original Assignee
NEC Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NEC Corp filed Critical NEC Corp
Priority to JP2284840A priority Critical patent/JPH04158480A/en
Publication of JPH04158480A publication Critical patent/JPH04158480A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To accelerate processing speed by generating a sequential circuit by generating the characteristic information of a set of pairs of internal states obtained from the data of an inputted state transition table, and selecting and applying the optimum method out of plural methods prepared in advance corresponding to the information. CONSTITUTION:A user inputs a transition table, and obtains the information for a pair of compatibility and a pair of incompatibility to retrieve the maximum compatible class generation program optimum for an inputted transition table by a judgement information generating means 1. A discriminating means 3 applies applies the pair of compatibility to a method when the number of pairs of compatibility is less than that of pairs of incompatability, and the maximum compatible class by the optimum method can be obtained, and the minimum internal state can be obtained. Thereby, the processing speed can be increased by two to five times.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、順序回路の最小化方法に関し、特に回路の状
態遷移表のデータを端末から入力し、回路のレジスタ等
の数を最小とするための状態数最小を得る順序回路の最
小化方法に関する。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to a method for minimizing sequential circuits, and in particular, a method for minimizing the number of registers, etc. in a circuit by inputting data of a state transition table of the circuit from a terminal. This paper relates to a method for minimizing the number of states for sequential circuits.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

従来この種の方法は、第4図に示すようにまず、端末か
ら入力された順序回路のデータ、すなわち状態遷移表の
データから両立性対、非両立性対を生成ステップC2に
より生成した後に、これら両立性対、非両立性対等の数
などの回路固有の特徴を考慮せず、順序回路に対して固
定のプログラムを用い、最小の状態を生成していた。
Conventionally, this type of method, as shown in FIG. 4, first generates compatible pairs and incompatible pairs from sequential circuit data input from a terminal, that is, state transition table data, in step C2. A fixed program was used for sequential circuits to generate the minimum state without considering circuit-specific characteristics such as the number of compatible pairs and incompatible pairs.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problem to be solved by the invention]

しかしながら、従来は、固定のプラグラム、すなわち特
定の状態遷移表のデータから得られる回路固有の特徴を
有しているデータに対してのみ有効なプログラムを用い
ているので、システムが有している固定の手法に適した
状態遷移表に対しては、必要最小限の内部状態の対にた
いしてのみ処理を行うため処理速度は速いが、適さない
状態遷移表にないしては、状態数最小化の処理に必要の
ない内部状態の対にないしても処理を行っているために
処理が冗長なものになり、最適の手法を用いた処理に比
べて処理速度の点で2倍から5倍町程度遅くなるという
欠点がある。
However, conventionally, a fixed program, that is, a program that is effective only for data that has circuit-specific characteristics obtained from data in a specific state transition table, is used. A state transition table that is suitable for this method has a high processing speed because it processes only the minimum number of pairs of internal states required, but a state transition table that is not suitable for this method is difficult to minimize the number of states. Processing is performed even if there are no pairs of internal states that are not needed, so the processing becomes redundant, and the processing speed is about 2 to 5 times slower than processing using the optimal method. There is a drawback.

本発明の目的は、処理速度が速い不完全指定順序回路最
小化方法を提供することにある。
An object of the present invention is to provide an incompletely specified sequential circuit minimization method with high processing speed.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means to solve the problem]

本発明の不完全指定順序回路最小化方法は、不完全指定
順序回路の状態遷移表のデータを入力し不完全指定順序
回路の最小化を行う方法において、前記入力された状態
遷移表のデータから得られる内部状態対の集合の特性情
報を生成する手段と、前記情報に応じて予め用意されて
いる複数の手法の中から最適の手法を選択し適用するこ
とにより状態数最小の順序回路を生成する手段を有する
ことを特徴とする。
The incompletely specified sequential circuit minimization method of the present invention is a method for minimizing an incompletely specified sequential circuit by inputting data of a state transition table of the incompletely specified sequential circuit. A sequential circuit with the minimum number of states is generated by means of generating characteristic information of the set of internal state pairs obtained, and by selecting and applying an optimal method from among a plurality of methods prepared in advance according to the information. It is characterized by having means for

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

以下、本発明について図面を参照して説明する。第1図
は本発明の一実施例を説明するための構成図である。同
図に示すように、判断情報生成手段1、探索手段2、判
定手段3、適用手段4、最小解生成手段5から構成され
ている6第2図は、第1図を具体的に示したah図であ
る。同図に示すように、判断情報生成手段1は遷移表入
力ステップA1、両立性対、非両立性対生成ステップA
2を有し、探索手段2、判定手段3は最適の最大両立性
クラス生成プログラム探索ステップA3を有し、適用手
段4は最大両立性クラスの生成ステップA4を有し、最
小解生成手段5は最小状態機械の生成ステップA5から
構成されている。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be explained with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram for explaining one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the same figure, it is composed of a judgment information generation means 1, a search means 2, a judgment means 3, an application means 4, and a minimum solution generation means 5. This is a diagram. As shown in the figure, the judgment information generation means 1 includes a transition table input step A1, a compatible pair and incompatible pair generation step A
2, the search means 2 and the determination means 3 have an optimal maximum compatibility class generation program search step A3, the application means 4 has a maximum compatibility class generation step A4, and the minimum solution generation means 5 has It consists of step A5 of generating a minimum state machine.

第3図は判定手段3の構成を示す流れ図である。同図に
示すように、判定手段3は遷移表から得られた両立性対
と非両立性対の数の比較ステップB1、非両立性対の構
成状態の判定ステップB2、手法1の選択ステップB3
、手法2の選択ステップB4、手法3の選択ステップB
5から構成されている。
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the configuration of the determining means 3. As shown in the figure, the determining means 3 includes a step B1 of comparing the number of compatible pairs and incompatible pairs obtained from the transition table, a step B2 of determining the configuration state of the incompatible pairs, and a step B3 of selecting method 1.
, selection step B4 of method 2, selection step B of method 3
It consists of 5.

次に本発明の動作について、図面を参照して説明する。Next, the operation of the present invention will be explained with reference to the drawings.

まず、利用者は遷移表入力ステップA1から遷移表を入
力し、判断情報生成手段1により、入力された遷移表に
とり最適の最大両立性クラス生成プログラムを探索する
ための、両立性対、非両立性対の数、および非両立性対
の状態にないする情報を得る。この情報に基き、判定手
段3は両立性対と非両立性対の数の比較ステップB1に
おいて、両立性対の数が非両立性対の数よりも少なけれ
ば手法3の選択ステップB5により両立性対を手法3に
適用して、最適手法による最大両立性クラスの生成ステ
ップA4により最大両立性クラスを得て、最小解の生成
ステップA5により最小の内部状態を得ている。
First, the user inputs a transition table from the transition table input step A1, and the judgment information generation means 1 generates a list of compatible pairs, incompatibles, etc., in order to search for the optimal maximum compatibility class generation program for the input transition table. Obtain information about the number of sex pairs and whether or not they are in an incompatible pair state. Based on this information, the determining means 3 compares the number of compatible pairs and incompatible pairs in step B1, and if the number of compatible pairs is less than the number of incompatible pairs, then in selection step B5 of method 3, compatibility is determined. By applying the pair to method 3, the maximum compatibility class is obtained by the maximum compatibility class generation step A4 using the optimal method, and the minimum internal state is obtained by the minimum solution generation step A5.

一例を示すと、入力された状態遷移表から得られる非両
立性対の数が12対、両立性対の数が9対の状態遷移表
入力に対し、非両立性対を使用して最小解を得る手法と
してS、R,Dasの手法を採用し、両立性対を使用し
て最小解を得る手法としてに、E、Ftofferの手
法を採用して処理速度を比較すると、両立性対を使用す
るK。
As an example, for a state transition table input in which the number of incompatible pairs obtained from the input state transition table is 12 and the number of compatible pairs is 9, the minimum solution is found using the incompatible pairs. The S, R, Das method is used to obtain the minimum solution, and the E, Ftoffer method is used to obtain the minimum solution using compatible pairs. K to do.

E、5tofferの手法の方が約2倍速いことが確認
出来な。
E. It cannot be confirmed that the 5toffer method is about twice as fast.

第3図の非両立性対の状態判定B2から手法1の選択B
3.手法2の選択B4までは本発明の第2の実施例を説
明するためのものである。本実施例では、最大両立性ク
ス生成のために非両立性クラスを使うこと以外第1の実
施例と同一である。
Selection B of method 1 from state determination B2 of incompatible pairs in Figure 3
3. The steps up to selection B4 of method 2 are for explaining the second embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment is the same as the first embodiment except that an incompatibility class is used to generate a maximum compatibility class.

両立性対、非両立性対の数の判定ステップB1により、
非両立性対の数が両立性対の数よりも少なければ非両立
性対の状態判定ステップB2において、非両立性対の集
合が全ての状態を有していて、かつ重複する状態がない
場合は手法1の選択ステップB3により、最大両立性ク
ラスを得、その他の場合は手法2の選択ステップB4に
より最大両立性クラスを得る。
In step B1 of determining the number of compatible pairs and incompatible pairs,
If the number of incompatible pairs is less than the number of compatible pairs, in incompatible pair state determination step B2, if the set of incompatible pairs has all the states and there are no overlapping states. obtains the maximum compatibility class by selection step B3 of method 1; otherwise obtains the maximum compatibility class by selection step B4 of method 2.

一例を示すと、入力された状態遷移表から得られる両立
性対の数が28対、非両立性対の数が8対である状態遷
移表を入力し非両立性対を最小化のために使用する手法
としてS、R,Dasの手法を採用し、両立性対を用い
た手法としてに、E、5tofferを採用して、処理
速度を比較すると、対の数が少ない非両立性対を用いた
S、R,Dasの手法を採用した方が、3倍程度速いこ
とが確認された。
To give an example, input a state transition table in which the number of compatible pairs obtained from the input state transition table is 28 and the number of incompatible pairs is 8, and in order to minimize the incompatible pairs, Comparing the processing speeds using the S, R, Das method and the E,5toffer method using compatible pairs, we find that it uses incompatible pairs with a small number of pairs. It was confirmed that adopting the S, R, Das method was about three times faster.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

本発明は、利用者が遷移表を入力するだけで、最大両立
性クラス生成のための最適の手法をシステムが自動的に
選択することによって最適の手法を選択することにより
、処理速度が2倍から5倍程度速くなる。更に、最適の
手法を選択する判断をシステムに行わせることにより、
利用者が判断を意識せずに処理を行うことが出来るとい
う効果がある。
The present invention doubles the processing speed by allowing the system to automatically select the optimal method for generating maximum compatibility classes by simply inputting a transition table by the user. It will be about 5 times faster. Furthermore, by having the system make the decision to select the optimal method,
This has the effect that the user can perform processing without being conscious of the decision.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明の一実施例を示す構成図、第2図は第1
図を具体的に示した流れ図、第3図は第1図の判定手段
3の構成を示す流れ図、第4図は従来の技術を示す流れ
図である。 1・・・判断情報生成手段、2・・・探索手段、3・・
・判定手段、4・・・適用手段、5・・・最小群生成手
段。
FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing one embodiment of the present invention, and FIG.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the configuration of the determining means 3 of FIG. 1, and FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a conventional technique. 1... Judgment information generating means, 2... Searching means, 3...
- Determination means, 4... Application means, 5... Minimum group generation means.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 不完全指定順序回路の状態遷移表のデータを入力し不完
全指定順序回路の最小化を行う方法において、前記入力
された状態遷移表のデータから得られる内部状態対の集
合の特性情報を生成する手段と、前記情報に応じて予め
用意されている複数の手法の中から最適の手法を選択し
適用することにより状態数最小の順序回路を生成する手
段を有することを特徴とする不完全指定順序回路最小化
方法。
In a method for minimizing an incompletely specified sequential circuit by inputting data of a state transition table of the incompletely specified sequential circuit, characteristic information of a set of internal state pairs obtained from the input state transition table data is generated. and a means for generating a sequential circuit with a minimum number of states by selecting and applying an optimal method from a plurality of methods prepared in advance according to the information. Circuit minimization method.
JP2284840A 1990-10-23 1990-10-23 Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit Pending JPH04158480A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2284840A JPH04158480A (en) 1990-10-23 1990-10-23 Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2284840A JPH04158480A (en) 1990-10-23 1990-10-23 Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04158480A true JPH04158480A (en) 1992-06-01

Family

ID=17683701

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2284840A Pending JPH04158480A (en) 1990-10-23 1990-10-23 Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH04158480A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009054147A (en) * 2007-07-02 2009-03-12 Cadence Design Systems Inc Method, system, and computer program product for generating automated assumption for compositional verification

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009054147A (en) * 2007-07-02 2009-03-12 Cadence Design Systems Inc Method, system, and computer program product for generating automated assumption for compositional verification

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chang et al. The analysis of decomposition methods for support vector machines
CN103425382B (en) Icon lookup method, device and terminal
JPH06162228A (en) Data flow processor device
JPH04158480A (en) Minimizing method for incomplete designation sequential circuit
JP2585895B2 (en) Communication control device and information processing device
JPH0528088A (en) Method for automatically generating hardware constitution information
JP2001101029A (en) Method and device for recording system call information
JPH08202525A (en) Device and method for screen input
JP3606372B2 (en) Computer-aided design method
JP2578777B2 (en) Set-occurrence storage order determining device for multi-tier database
JPH09212212A (en) Method for collating sequence circuit
JPH0224584A (en) Preparing method of test pattern
JPS6057436A (en) Arithmetic processor
JPH0736860A (en) Word processor
Li et al. A rule based image segmentation system (RBISS)
JPH1118005A (en) Image effect processing system and computer
JP2519336B2 (en) Technology-mapping method
JPH02150920A (en) Retrieving system for maximum value data
JP2928128B2 (en) CPU peripheral device simulation method and method
JPS61235929A (en) Data input controlling system
JPH02162458A (en) Parallel processor
JP2002185510A (en) Datagram transfer system
JPS6325723A (en) Permutation generating device with preference degree
JPH0452760A (en) Vector processor
JPS6371072A (en) Recording device