JPH036745A - Diagnostic system - Google Patents

Diagnostic system

Info

Publication number
JPH036745A
JPH036745A JP1142749A JP14274989A JPH036745A JP H036745 A JPH036745 A JP H036745A JP 1142749 A JP1142749 A JP 1142749A JP 14274989 A JP14274989 A JP 14274989A JP H036745 A JPH036745 A JP H036745A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
answer
answers
weight information
fault
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP1142749A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2750898B2 (en
Inventor
Minoru Horiuchi
実 堀内
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Engineering Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Engineering Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Engineering Corp filed Critical Toshiba Engineering Corp
Priority to JP1142749A priority Critical patent/JP2750898B2/en
Publication of JPH036745A publication Critical patent/JPH036745A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2750898B2 publication Critical patent/JP2750898B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Test And Diagnosis Of Digital Computers (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To shorten the restoring time of a fault system by outputting the weighted answers prepared for recovery of faults in the order of the weight priority and at the same time correcting and changing each weighting of each answer based on the fault recovery result. CONSTITUTION:A diagnostic system 5 analyzes the faults and the answers prepared for the recovery of faults, i.e., the analyzing results are weighted. In this case, the initial value is set according to the importance, for example, of each answer and the weighting is decided by the value obtained based on the hit frequency showing the correct answers and the recovery results. Then the priority is decided in the order of larger weight levels of the weighting. This weighting is however corrected based on the recovery results of faults. Then plural answers having each priority are shown on a display and printed out. As a result, the fault recovering time is shortened in a fault system.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 [発明の目的コ (産業上の利用分野) 本発明はたとえばコンビュータンステムなどのシステム
における保守を行う際のシステムの障害を診断する診断
システムに関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Object of the Invention (Industrial Application Field) The present invention relates to a diagnostic system for diagnosing system failures during maintenance of a system such as a convertan stem.

(従来の技術) コンピュータは近年、各種の分野で使用されており、た
とえばミニコンピユータを主処理装置とし、これに複数
の端末をLAN等のネットワークで接続して各種の処理
をたとえば時分割方式で行うシステムがある。
(Prior Art) In recent years, computers have been used in various fields. For example, a minicomputer is used as the main processing unit, and multiple terminals are connected to this via a network such as a LAN to perform various processing in a time-sharing manner. There is a system to do it.

このようなシステムにおいて、主処理装置であるコンピ
ュータにおいて何等かの障害か発生すると処理停止ある
いはシステム停止舌の事態か発生する。
In such a system, if some kind of failure occurs in the computer, which is the main processing unit, processing will stop or the system will stop.

そこで、システムの定期点検等の保守サービスが行われ
ているが、上述の障害はバースト的に発生するため、結
局、ユーザは保守サービス側に、システムに障害が発生
した旨を通知し、これにより保守サービス側のサービス
マンかユーザ側に出向してシステム障害の解析および仮
装置を施した後、システムの障害情報を専門部門におい
て解析し、その解析結果に基づいて所定の部品等を用意
し、サービスマンが再度ユーザ側に出向して対策を講じ
ている。
Therefore, maintenance services such as periodic inspections of the system are performed, but since the above-mentioned failures occur in bursts, the user ends up notifying the maintenance service that a failure has occurred in the system, and After a service person from the maintenance service side or the user's side is dispatched to analyze the system failure and install a temporary device, the system failure information is analyzed in a specialized department, and based on the analysis results, predetermined parts etc. are prepared. A service engineer is once again dispatched to the user's site to take measures.

したがって、システムの障害発生からこれを復旧するま
でに長時間を要するため、迅速な対応が要望されている
Therefore, since it takes a long time to recover from the occurrence of a system failure, a prompt response is required.

そこで、ユーザーズシステムにたとえば公衆網を介して
診断システムを接続可能に構築し、保守サービス側にお
いて診断システムによりユーザーズシステムからの障害
情報を得てこれを解析し、その解析結果である複数の解
答に基づいて所定の部品等を用意し、サービスマンがユ
ーザ側に出向して対策を講じることが行われている。
Therefore, a diagnostic system is constructed so that it can be connected to the user's system via, for example, a public network, and the maintenance service side uses the diagnostic system to obtain fault information from the user's system, analyze it, and generate multiple answers as the result of the analysis. Based on this, predetermined parts and the like are prepared, and a service person is dispatched to the user's side to take countermeasures.

しかしながら、上述の診断システムでは、予め障害情報
およびこの障害子情報に対応する複数の解答を統計的に
蓄積しておき、その蓄積情報に基づいて上述の解答を求
めるため、解答が偏りやすく必ずしも正解の解答1害を
対処する解答)を得ることができず、結局、1回のサー
ビスマンの出向でシステムの障害を復旧することができ
ず、サービスマンが再度出向する必要が発生するという
課題がある。
However, in the above-mentioned diagnostic system, multiple answers corresponding to the disability information and the disabled child information are statistically accumulated in advance, and the above-mentioned answer is obtained based on the accumulated information, so the answers tend to be biased and are not necessarily correct. (Answer 1 to deal with the problem), and in the end, the system failure could not be recovered by a single dispatch of a service engineer, resulting in the problem that the service engineer would need to be dispatched again. be.

(発明が解決しようとする課題) 上述したように従来では、システムに障害が発生すると
、その復旧に長時間を要し、迅速なメンテナンスサービ
スを提供することが困難であるという課題がある。
(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) As described above, in the conventional system, there is a problem in that when a failure occurs in a system, it takes a long time to restore the system, making it difficult to provide prompt maintenance services.

本発明は上述した従来の課題を解決するためのもので、
障害システムの復旧時間を短縮することができ、迅速な
メンテナンスサービスの提供を実現することのできる診
断システムを提供することを目的としている。
The present invention is intended to solve the above-mentioned conventional problems,
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a diagnostic system that can shorten the recovery time of a faulty system and provide prompt maintenance services.

[発明の構成] (課題を解決するための手段) 本発明は、上記目的を達成するために、被診断システム
と診断システムとのmjで網を介してデータの通信が可
能とされ、前記診断システムが前記被診断システムから
の障害情報に基づきその障害を診断するように構成され
たリモート保守診断システムにおいて、前記被診断シス
テムで発生した障害を解消すべく求められた複数の解答
およびこれら各解答に対応して付加された重み情報とを
蓄積する手段と、前記複数の解答のうち前記障害を解消
した正解の解答に対応する重み情報に所定の適正値を加
算し、正解とならなかった各解答の各重み情報に全重み
情報に基づくバランス補正値を加算して前記各重み情報
を補正するとともに、前記複数の解答のうち補正すべき
所定の解答に対応する重み情報に所定の補正値を加算し
、この補正すべき解答以外の各解答の各重み情報から全
重み情報に基づくバランス補正値を減算して前記各重み
情報を補正し、これらの情報を前記蓄積する手段にフィ
ードバックする手段とを具備する。
[Structure of the Invention] (Means for Solving the Problems) In order to achieve the above object, the present invention enables data communication via a network at MJ between a system to be diagnosed and a diagnostic system, and In a remote maintenance diagnosis system configured to diagnose a fault based on fault information from the system to be diagnosed, a plurality of answers required to resolve the fault that has occurred in the system to be diagnosed, and each of these answers. a means for accumulating weight information added corresponding to the answer, and a means for adding a predetermined appropriate value to the weight information corresponding to the correct answer that solved the problem among the plurality of answers, A balance correction value based on all weight information is added to each weight information of the answer to correct each weight information, and a predetermined correction value is added to weight information corresponding to a predetermined answer to be corrected among the plurality of answers. means for correcting each of the weight information by subtracting a balance correction value based on the total weight information from each weight information of each answer other than the answer to be corrected, and feeding back these information to the accumulating means; Equipped with.

(作 用) 本発明では、被診断システムで発生した障害を解消すべ
く求められた複数の解答およびこれら各解答に対応して
付加された重み情報とを蓄積するとともに、複数の解答
のうち障害を解消した正解の解答に対応する重み情報に
所定の適正値を加算し、正解とならなかった各解答の各
重み情報に全重み情報に基づくバランス補正値を加算し
て各重み情報を補正し、また、複数の解答のうち補正す
べき所定の解答に対応する重み情報に所定の補正値を加
算し、この補正すべき解答以外の各解答の各重み情報か
ら全重み情報に基づくバランス補正値を減算して各重み
情報を補正し、これらの情報を上述の蓄積情報にフィー
ドバックするので、発生した障害に対応する適切な解答
を得ることができ、これにより、障害システムの復旧時
間を短縮することができ、迅速なメンテナンスサービス
の提供を実現することができる。
(Function) In the present invention, a plurality of answers obtained in order to eliminate a fault that has occurred in the system to be diagnosed and weight information added corresponding to each of these answers are accumulated, and a fault is detected among the plural answers. A predetermined appropriate value is added to the weight information corresponding to the correct answer that solved the problem, and a balance correction value based on the total weight information is added to each weight information of each answer that was not correct to correct each weight information. , In addition, a predetermined correction value is added to the weight information corresponding to a predetermined answer to be corrected among the plurality of answers, and a balance correction value based on all weight information is calculated from each weight information of each answer other than the answer to be corrected. Since each weight information is corrected by subtracting , and this information is fed back to the above-mentioned accumulated information, it is possible to obtain an appropriate answer corresponding to the fault that has occurred, thereby shortening the recovery time of the faulty system. This makes it possible to provide prompt maintenance services.

(実施例) 以下、本発明の実施例を図面を用いて説明する。(Example) Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

第1図は本発明の一実施例の診断システムが適用された
リモート保守診断システムの全体構成を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the overall configuration of a remote maintenance diagnosis system to which a diagnosis system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied.

同図に示すように、このシステムは、ユーザズシステム
である被診断システム1と、被診断システム1をモデム
2を介して接続するたとえば公衆網や専用網等の通信網
3と、通信網3にモデム4を介して接続され被診断シス
テムlの障害の診断を行う診断システム5とから1h成
される。
As shown in the figure, this system includes a system to be diagnosed 1, which is a user's system, a communication network 3, such as a public network or a private network, which connects the system 1 to be diagnosed via a modem 2, and a communication network 3, such as a public network or a private network. A diagnostic system 5 connected via a modem 4 and diagnosing a fault in the system to be diagnosed l is constructed for 1h.

被診断システム1において、障害が発生すると、ハード
ウェア上の障害情報とソフトウェア上の障害情報とがた
とえばバイナリ情報で、モデム2、通信網3およびモデ
ム4を介して診断システム5に転送される。これにより
、診断システム5において、障害の解析が行われ、その
解析結果である複数の解答が所定の優先順位で得られる
。これにより、サービスマンが優先順位の解答に基−)
f l’ で所定の部品等を用意し被診断システム1側
に出向して障害修復の作業を行う。
When a fault occurs in the system to be diagnosed 1, hardware fault information and software fault information are transferred, for example, as binary information, to the diagnostic system 5 via the modem 2, communication network 3, and modem 4. As a result, the diagnostic system 5 analyzes the failure, and obtains a plurality of answers as the analysis results in a predetermined priority order. This allows service personnel to base their answers on priorities.
At fl', predetermined parts and the like are prepared, and the system is dispatched to the system 1 to be diagnosed to perform trouble repair work.

そして、障害が復旧されると、診断システム5において
、障害情報およびその障害に対する上述の優先順位のあ
る複数の解答およびこれらの解答のうち正解であった解
答(障害を解消した解答)の情報が蓄積され、次回の障
害の解析に反映させる。
When the fault is recovered, the diagnostic system 5 stores the fault information, the plurality of answers with the above-mentioned priorities for the fault, and information on the correct answer among these answers (answer that resolved the fault). It is accumulated and reflected in the next failure analysis.

次に、第2図を用いて上述の解析の流れについて説明す
る。
Next, the flow of the above-mentioned analysis will be explained using FIG.

上述したように、障害が発生した被診断システム1から
ハードウェア上の障害情報とソフトウェア上の障害情報
とがたとえばバイナリ情報で診断システム5に転送され
ると、データーベース6を参照して、ダメージモード、
エラーコード、エラー名称がそれぞれ判断されるととし
に、障害に対応する解析情報1〜nがそれぞれ判断され
る。
As described above, when hardware failure information and software failure information are transferred from the system 1 to be diagnosed where a failure has occurred to the diagnosis system 5 in the form of binary information, the database 6 is referred to and the damage information is determined. mode,
When the error code and error name are determined, the analysis information 1 to n corresponding to the failure is determined.

そして上述の各要因に基づいて解答群が求められる。Then, a group of answers is determined based on each of the above-mentioned factors.

この後、解答群における複数の解答の優先順位が判定さ
れ、最終的に、優先順位のある複数の解答が得られ、た
とえばデイスプレィ表示、プリントアウトにより出力さ
れる。なお、上述の最終的に求められた優先順位のある
複数の解答は次回の障害の解析に反映させるようデータ
ーベース6に蓄積されるとともに、この優先順位のある
複数の解答に括づいて障害復旧を行った際の復旧結果、
つまり優先順位のある複数の解答のうちどの解答により
障害を修復することができたかの結果もデーターベース
6にフィードバックする。
Thereafter, the priority order of the plurality of answers in the answer group is determined, and finally, a plurality of answers with priority order are obtained and outputted, for example, on a display or as a printout. The above-mentioned multiple answers with a priority order are accumulated in the database 6 so as to be reflected in the next failure analysis, and failure recovery is performed based on these multiple answers with a priority order. Restoration results when performing
In other words, the result of which answer among the plurality of answers with priorities was able to repair the fault is also fed back to the database 6.

次に、解答群における優先順位の決定について第3図を
用いて説明する。
Next, the determination of priority order in the answer group will be explained using FIG. 3.

同図に示すように、解答群Kには、複数の解答1〜nが
あり、これらの解答1〜nには、それぞれ重み付けがな
されている。
As shown in the figure, the answer group K includes a plurality of answers 1 to n, and each of these answers 1 to n is weighted.

この重み付けは、各解答におけるたとえば重要度等によ
り初期値が設定され、さらに正解となったヒツト回数お
よび修理結果に基づく値により決定される。
The initial value of this weighting is set based on, for example, the importance level of each answer, and is further determined based on the number of correct answers and a value based on the repair results.

そして、この重み付けの重みが重いものから順に優先順
位が決定される。なお、上述の重み付けは、障害の修復
結果に基づいて補正される。
Then, the priorities are determined in descending order of weight. Note that the above-mentioned weighting is corrected based on the result of fault repair.

次に、各解答における重み付けの補正処理を第4図およ
び第5図を用いて説明する。
Next, the weighting correction process for each answer will be explained using FIGS. 4 and 5.

まず、解答群の各解答をKai 1、Kai 2、・・
・Kainとしく但し、nはQ<n) 、各解答の重み
を冒eight(1) 、Weight(2) 、−W
eight(n) とする。
First, each answer in the answer group is Kai 1, Kai 2, etc.
・As Kain, where n is Q<n), the weight of each answer is eight(1), Weight(2), -W
Let eight(n) be.

解答群のうち解答Kal Xが正解となったときの各解
答の重み付けは第4図のフローチャートに示すように変
更される(但し、0くX≦n)。
When the answer Kal

まず、解答群における正解の有無が確認され(ステップ
1)、解答Kai Xの重み変更が、次式%式%() (Aはシステムでの適正加算値) により行われる(ステップ2)。
First, the presence or absence of a correct answer in the answer group is confirmed (Step 1), and the weight of the answer Kai

次に、解答全体の重みの和Sが、 S = A Weight(K) により求められ(ステップ3)、さらに、各解答の重み
が、 Weight(a)  X  1 0 解答の重みが、 Weight(a) −Weight(a) +S −
Weight(a) によりそれぞれ求められ(ステップ4)、各解答の重み
付けが変更される。
Next, the sum S of the weights of all the answers is calculated by S = A Weight (K) (step 3), and the weight of each answer is Weight (a) ) −Weight(a) +S −
Weight(a) is calculated respectively (step 4), and the weighting of each answer is changed.

次に、解答群のうちの解答Kai Yの重みを補正する
場合、各解答の重み付けは第5図のフローチャートに示
すように変更される(但し、O<Y≦n)。
Next, when correcting the weight of the answer Kai Y in the answer group, the weighting of each answer is changed as shown in the flowchart of FIG. 5 (however, O<Y≦n).

まず、解答群における補正光の解答か決定され(ステッ
プ11)、解答Kai Yの重み変更が、次式 %式%) (Aはシステムでの適正補正値) により行われる(ステップ12)。
First, the answer of the correction light in the answer group is determined (step 11), and the weight of the answer Kai Y is changed using the following formula (% formula %) (A is an appropriate correction value in the system) (step 12).

次に、解答全体の重みの和Sが、 S = A Weight(K) により求められ(ステップ13)、さらに、6讐eig
ht(a)  X  ]  0veight(a)  
=Weighc(a)S −WeighL(a) によりそれぞれ求められ(ステップ14)、各解答の重
み付けが変更される。
Next, the sum S of the weights of all answers is determined by S = A Weight (K) (step 13), and
ht(a)
=Weightc(a) S -WeightL(a) (step 14), and the weighting of each answer is changed.

このように上述の実施例における診断システムでは、障
害情報に基づいて重み付けのされた解答がその重みの優
先順位で出力されるとともに、各解答の各重み付けは、
障害修復結果により解答群の全体のバランスに合せて補
正、変更されるので、重み付けの極端な偏りが防止され
、障害に対して出力される解答群が適切なものとするこ
とができる。
In this manner, in the diagnostic system in the above-described embodiment, answers weighted based on the fault information are output in the priority order of the weights, and each weight of each answer is
Since the fault repair results are corrected and changed in accordance with the overall balance of the answer group, extreme bias in weighting can be prevented, and the answer group output for the fault can be made appropriate.

[発明の効果] 以上説明したように本発明の診断システムは、被診断シ
ステムで発生した障害を解消すべく求められた複数の解
答およびこれら各解答に対応して付加された重み情報と
を蓄櫃するとともに、複数の解答のうち障害を解消した
正解の解答に対応する重み情報に所定の適正値を加算し
、正解とならなかった各解答の各重み情報に全重み情報
に基づくバランス補正値を加算して各重み情報を補正し
、また、複数の解答のうち補正すべき所定の解答に対応
する重み情報に所定の補正値を加算し、この補正すべき
解答以外の各解答の各重み情報から全重み情報に基づく
バランス補正値を減算して各重み情報を補正するので、
発生した障害に対応する適切な解答を得ることができ、
これにより、障害システムの復旧時間を短縮することが
でき、迅速なメンテナンスサービスの提供を実現するこ
とができる。
[Effects of the Invention] As explained above, the diagnostic system of the present invention stores a plurality of answers required to eliminate a fault occurring in a diagnosed system and weight information added corresponding to each of these answers. At the same time, a predetermined appropriate value is added to the weight information corresponding to the correct answer that solved the problem among the multiple answers, and a balance correction value based on the total weight information is added to each weight information of each answer that was not correct. is added to correct each weight information, and a predetermined correction value is added to the weight information corresponding to a predetermined answer to be corrected among multiple answers, and each weight of each answer other than the answer to be corrected is Since each weight information is corrected by subtracting the balance correction value based on the total weight information from the information,
You can get an appropriate answer to the problem that occurs,
This makes it possible to shorten the recovery time of a faulty system and realize prompt provision of maintenance services.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明の一実施例の診断システムが適用された
リモート保守診断システムの全体構成を説明するための
図、第2図は本発明における解析の流れを説明するため
の図、第3図は本発明における解答群の優先順位の決定
を説明するための図、第4図および第5図は本発明にお
ける各解答の重み付けの補正処理を説明するためのフロ
ーチャートである。 1・・・被診断システム、2.4・・・モデム、3・・
・通信網、5・・診断システム、6・・・データーベー
ス。
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the overall configuration of a remote maintenance diagnosis system to which a diagnosis system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied, FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the flow of analysis in the present invention, and FIG. The figure is a diagram for explaining the determination of the priority order of answer groups in the present invention, and FIGS. 4 and 5 are flowcharts for explaining the correction process of weighting of each answer in the present invention. 1... System to be diagnosed, 2.4... Modem, 3...
-Communication network, 5...Diagnostic system, 6...Database.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 被診断システムと診断システムとの間で網を介してデー
タの通信が可能とされ、前記診断システムが前記被診断
システムからの障害情報に基づきその障害を診断するよ
うに構成されたリモート保守診断システムにおいて、 前記被診断システムで発生した障害を解消すべく求めら
れた複数の解答およびこれら各解答に対応して付加され
た重み情報とを蓄積する手段と、前記複数の解答のうち
前記障害を解消した正解の解答に対応する重み情報に所
定の適正値を加算し、正解とならなかった各解答の各重
み情報に全重み情報に基づくバランス補正値を加算して
前記各重み情報を補正するとともに、前記複数の解答の
うち補正すべき所定の解答に対応する重み情報に所定の
補正値を加算し、この補正すべき解答以外の各解答の各
重み情報から全重み情報に基づくバランス補正値を減算
して前記各重み情報を補正し、これらの情報を前記蓄積
する手段にフィードバックする手段と を具備する診断システム。
[Scope of Claims] Data communication is possible between a system to be diagnosed and a diagnostic system via a network, and the diagnostic system is configured to diagnose a fault based on fault information from the system to be diagnosed. A remote maintenance diagnosis system comprising: a means for accumulating a plurality of answers required to resolve a fault occurring in the diagnosed system and weight information added corresponding to each of the answers; and a means for storing the plurality of answers. Among them, a predetermined appropriate value is added to the weight information corresponding to the correct answer that eliminates the above-mentioned obstacle, and a balance correction value based on the total weight information is added to each weight information of each answer that is not correct. At the same time as correcting the weight information, a predetermined correction value is added to the weight information corresponding to the predetermined answer to be corrected among the plurality of answers, and total weight information is calculated from each weight information of each answer other than the answer to be corrected. A diagnostic system comprising: means for correcting each of the weight information by subtracting a balance correction value based on the above, and feeding back this information to the means for accumulating.
JP1142749A 1989-06-05 1989-06-05 Diagnostic system Expired - Lifetime JP2750898B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1142749A JP2750898B2 (en) 1989-06-05 1989-06-05 Diagnostic system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1142749A JP2750898B2 (en) 1989-06-05 1989-06-05 Diagnostic system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH036745A true JPH036745A (en) 1991-01-14
JP2750898B2 JP2750898B2 (en) 1998-05-13

Family

ID=15322688

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1142749A Expired - Lifetime JP2750898B2 (en) 1989-06-05 1989-06-05 Diagnostic system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2750898B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009064101A (en) * 2007-09-04 2009-03-26 Toshiba Corp Remote monitoring system and remote monitoring method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009064101A (en) * 2007-09-04 2009-03-26 Toshiba Corp Remote monitoring system and remote monitoring method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2750898B2 (en) 1998-05-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU768166B2 (en) Method and apparatus for diagnosing difficult to diagnose faults in a complex system
US6446058B1 (en) Computer platform alarm and control system
US5287505A (en) On-line problem management of remote data processing systems, using local problem determination procedures and a centralized database
EP1234407B1 (en) Network event correlation system using protocol models
CN110032463B (en) System fault positioning method and system based on Bayesian network
Walter et al. Formally verified on-line diagnosis
US20040153864A1 (en) Device for aiding the locating of failure of a complex system
JPH036745A (en) Diagnostic system
JP2003032253A (en) In-advance countermeasure on-line diagnosis in manageable network
US20070271486A1 (en) Method and system to detect software faults
CN110238878A (en) Self checking method and device for robot
CN110213093B (en) Method and system for reporting node fault auxiliary diagnosis based on airport internet of things
Syrotkina et al. Mathematical Methods for Detecting and Localizing Failures in Complex Hardware/Software Systems
JP2853215B2 (en) Network reliability analysis system
Cabasino et al. Fault model identification with Petri nets
CN117034195B (en) Nuclear power instrument overhaul scheduling method and device, storage medium and computer equipment
JP2641509B2 (en) Failure dictionary creation method
JP7362573B2 (en) Elevator failure recovery method and elevator failure recovery support system
CN114328163A (en) Intelligent diagnosis method, system and equipment for software system
JPH10200527A (en) Method and device for diagnosing fault in network service
CN117097752A (en) Intelligent operation and maintenance system and method for Internet of vehicles system
Albini et al. A generalized model for distributed comparison-based system-level diagnosis
CN115421959A (en) Fault processing method and system
TR202019105A2 (en) Source detection method in multiple faults for telecommunication systems
CN113420917A (en) Method, computer device and storage medium for predicting future failure of business system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080227

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100227

Year of fee payment: 12

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100227

Year of fee payment: 12

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100227

Year of fee payment: 12