JPH0353119A - Examining device of aptitude for pilot - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To examine the multiple information processing capability by receiving operation information from a stick and a pedal to move a cursor and recording positional relative relations between the cursor and a target. CONSTITUTION:This examination consists of 9 kinds of lower-order examination from examination 1 to examination 9, and various data select picture is displayed on a monitor 35 when lower-order examination is selected by a keyboard. For example, examination 1 purposes examining the coordinating capability, and an examinee sees the examination picture display on a front CRT 9F to control the motion of the picture by joysticks 19L and 19R or a ladder pedal 29. Check 2 purposes examining the multiple information processing capability, and he responds to motions of measuring gauges and arithmetic questions displayed on CRTs 9L and 9R. Examination 3 purposes examining the degree of mental composure, and he responds to an auditory stimulus given from a speaker 17. He is examined up to examination 9, and his number of heart is measured during examination and is fed back to his by a heart beat display light 13.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention relates to a flight control aptitude testing device for testing physiological and psychological aptitude as a flight pilot.

(Prior Art) In a training agency for flight pilots, it is common practice to select only those who are endowed with aptitude from a large number of applicants ψ as pilot trainees. A typical aptitude test device conventionally used for such selection tests is Hori et al., "Analysis of Hand-Hand-Hand Coordination Test Results," Aviation Medical Experimental Corps Report Vol. 3 (1)
, 1963, published by the Japan Air Self-Defense Force Aviation Medical Experimental Corps,
There is something written in.

In this device, a test paper with two irregularly curved lines printed on it is wound around a rotatably driven drum, and two pens are attached to this to trace the lines, one of which can be used manually. One stick is connected to the stick, and the other is connected to a pedal that is operated by the foot. When the drum rotates at a constant speed, the subject operates the stick with his hand and the pedal with his foot so as to trace the line with the pen.

The ability to coordinate vision and limbs is determined based on the amount of deviation of the pen's trajectory from the line.

In addition to these coordination tests, written intelligence tests are also commonly administered. A representative example of conventional intelligence tests is the rR-100 Human Intelligence Test published by Labor Science Testing Institute. This includes calculation, common sense, difference discrimination,
It consists of six subtests related to permutation, figure segmentation, and memory.

Additionally, an agitation response test will be conducted. That is, an object moving in a straight line at a speed of τ is placed in the field of view, and is hidden in the middle of the movement. Then, the subject predicts the time when the hidden object will reach a predetermined point and presses a button. This test examines the accuracy of time perception, that is, whether your time perception is appropriate, whether you tend to get anxious, or whether you tend to delay.

Mental health tests are also being conducted. For example, in a test in which randomly arranged numbers are picked up in numerical order, mental concentration is determined by the total time required for the task. Also, to check mental stability,
The quality of each PIF test result may be referred to, or the heart rate and brain waves during the test may be determined.

(Problem to be solved by the invention) The important qualities required of a flight pilot are: 1. Ability to coordinate hands and feet 2. Ability to process multiple information 3. Mental stability and mental reserve level 4. Of intelligence, form perception and memory are particularly important.

A very high degree of hand-foot coordination is required for flight maneuvers. For example, when operating an actual aircraft, there is a large time lag that cannot be ignored between the operator's operations and the movement of the aircraft. Therefore, there is a need for the ability to proactively execute maneuvers while predicting the future while taking time lag into account. Furthermore, there are many cases where the movements of both hands must be controlled separately, such as steering with one hand and operating other levers, etc. with the other hand. However, the above-mentioned conventional coordination ability testing device cannot test such complex limb coordination ability required for actual maneuvering.

Multiple information processing ability is the ability to accurately handle multiple information processing tasks at the same time. For example, it is the ability to accurately perform information processing such as monitoring instruments and making necessary situational judgments while performing appropriate piloting operations. be. However, active testing of this multiple information processing ability has not been done in the past.

Mental stability and mental reserve are the ability to accurately perform tasks that require mental concentration without causing mental disturbance even when a disturbing stimulus is loaded. For example, in the event that a 71PI situation occurs in the air, one must have sufficient mental stability and mental capacity to calmly respond to the situation and take appropriate measures. However, conventionally, if the results of the various tests mentioned above are good, it is assumed that the level of mental stability is high.
Alternatively, only simple tests are performed, such as measuring the heart rate during various tests and determining that the stability is high if there is little change in the heart rate. With such a simple test, it is difficult to accurately determine the API level of mental stability, which means that a person can maintain a state of mental concentration against disturbing stimuli.

Regarding the correlation between intelligence and flight maneuver aptitude, Hori et al., ``Report on research and development of intelligence tests (1) PI LOT
On the validity of current intelligence tests from the perspective of selection.”
, Aviation Medical Experiment Team Report Vol. I. 2(2), 1962, a noteworthy report was made. This is because the six sub-tests used in conventional intelligence tests do not all have the same degree of correlation with piloting aptitude; figure segmentation, memory, substitution, and difference/similarity discrimination have a relatively high degree of correlation. Calculation and general perception have a relatively low degree of correlation.Among these sub-tests that are said to have a high degree of correlation, division, substitution, and difference discrimination belong to form perception ability.

Therefore, in the pilot aptitude test, emphasis should be placed on the perceptual ability test and the memory test among the intelligence tests. However, conventional intelligence tests do not focus on these two subtests.

Furthermore, flight pilots are required to have high time perception during movements such as rotations and turns. However, since the conventional agitation reaction test only involves moving an object in a uniform linear motion, it is not possible to test time perception in circular motion.

Accordingly, a first object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus capable of testing complex limb coordination skills such as those required for critical flight maneuvers.

A second object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus capable of testing multiple information processing ability.

A third object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus that can accurately test mental stability and mental capacity.

A fourth object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus capable of conducting an intelligence test that focuses on form perception and memory.

A fifth object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus that can perform a fish drying reaction test in a circular motion.

A sixth object of the present invention is to provide a device that can perform all of the above tests with one device.

(Means for Solving the Problems) A first aspect of the present invention provides an inspection screen display device having a screen, and at least one pair of a cursor and a target that make a predetermined relative movement by driving this display device. means for displaying on a screen a cooperative test image representing , at least one stick for inputting hand operation information, a pedal for inputting foot operation information, and operation information from the stick and the pedal. To provide a flight maneuvering aptitude test device having a cursor moving means for moving a cursor in response to a received signal, and a means for recording a positional relationship between the cursor and a target.

In this inspection device, a first cursor and a first target making a first relative movement, a second cursor and a second target making a second relative movement are shown in the cooperative inspection image, and a second cursor and a second target making a second relative movement are shown in the cooperative inspection image. The first cursor moves according to the operation information from the stick, the second cursor moves according to the operation information from the pedal, and the positional relative relationship between the first cursor and the first target and the second cursor move according to the operation information from the pedal. The relative positional relationship between the cursor and the second target may be recorded.

Further, the inspection device of the first invention has a first stick for inputting right hand operation information and a second stick for inputting left hand operation information, and the cursor is a first element. and a second element, where the first element moves according to operation information from the first stick, and the second element moves according to operation information from the second stick. can do.

A plurality of different relative movements between the cursor and the target can be selected. moreover,
It is also possible to select a motion that is a combination of regular motion along a predetermined trajectory and irregular motion that suddenly deviates from the trajectory.

It is also possible to insert a predetermined time lag between the operation of the stick or pedal and the movement of the cursor.

In addition to the configuration of the first invention, a second invention of the present invention provides a monitoring screen display device having a screen and a monitoring screen display device that drives a monitoring screen display device to display a monitoring image that exhibits sporadic abnormal operations on the monitoring screen. means for displaying on the screen of the device; a response switch for inputting response information corresponding to the abnormal operation; and a recording means for receiving the response information and recording the temporal relative relationship between the winning cup and the redundant operation. Provided is a flight maneuverability testing device further comprising:

A third aspect of the present invention is to drive a question screen display device having a screen and a question double-sided display device to sporadically display an image representing a predetermined question on a question screen, according to the configuration of the first invention. A flight maneuver aptitude testing device further comprising means for displaying on the screen of the device, an answer switch for inputting an answer to a question, and a means for receiving the answer and recording the correctness or wrongness of the answer and the temporal relationship with the question. provide.

A fourth aspect of the present invention provides an inspection screen display device having a screen, and a target that moves along a predetermined trajectory including a trajectory by driving the inspection screen display device and displays a target hidden in the middle of the predetermined trajectory. a means for displaying on a screen a test image of a nervous system, a response switch for inputting response information at a predicted time point when the target reaches a predetermined position on the trajectory, and means for receiving the response information and recording an error at the predicted time point; Provided is a flight maneuver aptitude testing device having the following features.

A fifth aspect of the present invention is an examination screen display device having a screen, a means for driving the examination screen display device to display on the screen a consciousness concentration examination image representing a plurality of randomly arranged symbols; A flight maneuver having a coordinate switch for inputting coordinate information of symbols, and means for receiving the coordinate information and recording the time interval in which each of said symbols is located according to a predetermined order and the sum of 1 hour. Provides aptitude testing equipment.

In addition to the configuration of the fifth invention, a sixth invention of the present invention provides an acoustic device that sporadically generates auditory stimulation, a response switch for inputting response information corresponding to the auditory stimulation, and a response switch that receives response information. The present invention provides a flight maneuvering aptitude testing device further comprising means for recording the temporal relationship between the auditory stimulus and the appropriateness of the auditory stimulus.

A seventh aspect of the present invention provides an examination screen display device having a screen, and driving the examination screen display device to selectively display an image representing a predetermined visual memory problem and an image representing a predetermined form perception problem. To provide a flight maneuver aptitude testing device having means for displaying on a screen, an answer switch for inputting answers to each of the visual memory question and the perceptual question, and means for receiving the answers and recording their correctness. .

The device of the seventh invention includes an acoustic device that generates a predetermined auditory memory question, a response switch for inputting questions and answers to the auditory memory question, and means for receiving answers from the response switch and recording whether the answers are correct or incorrect. The configuration may further include the following.

An eighth aspect of the present invention provides a first screen display device having a first screen, a second screen display device having a second screen, a third screen display device having a third screen, and a third screen display device having a third screen. means for driving a screen display device to selectively display a predetermined coordination test image, a predetermined agitation reaction test image, a predetermined consciousness concentration test image, a predetermined memory test image, or a predetermined perceptual test image;
Means for driving a second double-sided display device to display a predetermined monitoring image on the second screen; and means for driving a third screen display device to display a predetermined question image on the third screen. a sound device that generates a predetermined auditory stimulus and a predetermined auditory memory problem; a stick for inputting hand operation information; a pedal for inputting foot operation information; and operation information from the stick and the pedal. means for controlling the movement of the cooperative image in response to the response, and response information for each of the agitation reaction test image, the consciousness concentration test image, the memory test image, the perceptual test image, the monitoring image, the question image, the auditory stimulus, and the auditory memory problem. To provide a flight maneuver aptitude testing device having a response switch for inputting information, and means for recording test results based on operation information from a stick and pedal and response information from the response switch, respectively.

(Function) According to the first invention, the cursor in the coordination test image moves in accordance with the stick operation by the hand and the pedal operation by the foot. The cursor and the target are making a predetermined relative movement, and the player controls the positional relationship between the cursor and the target by operating a stick and a pedal.

The results of this control are recorded for evaluation. It represents a first cursor and target that makes a first relative movement in the inspection image, and a second cursor and target that makes a second relative movement, where the first cursor moves according to the stick operation, and the second cursor moves in accordance with the stick operation. In a device that moves in response to pedal operation, the first relative motion is set to a motion similar to the control stick operation of an actual aircraft, and the second relative motion is set to a motion similar to the rudder pedal operation of an actual aircraft. By doing so, it is possible to test the cooperative ability similar to operating a long-range aircraft. Furthermore, with a device in which the cursor is divided into two elements and each element is controlled separately by two sticks operated by the left and right hands, the ability to control the movements of the left and right hands independently can be tested. . Furthermore, by inserting a time lag between the operation of the stick or pedal and the movement of the cursor, it is possible to test the ability to perform proactive maneuvering required for piloting an actual aircraft. Furthermore, if a combination of regular motion and sudden irregular motion can be selected as the relative motion, the ability to adapt to all unexpected situations can also be tested.

According to the second and third inventions, in addition to the above-described cooperative work, the subject is required to respond appropriately and quickly to the monitoring image and the question image. Therefore, it is possible to test the ability to process multiple information.

According to the fourth invention, an irritation reaction test in circular motion is performed.

According to the fifth invention, the time required for each symbol and the total time required in the symbol search task are recorded. In conventional tests, mental concentration was determined only from the overall time required.
In this invention, the time required for each symbol can also be used as a judgment material, and based on this, it is possible to judge whether or not there is a blocking phenomenon (a phenomenon that is detected visually but not recognized by the brain) when a person lacks calmness. It is possible to test mental stability.

According to the sixth invention, in addition to the above symbol search operation,
A response to the auditory stimulus is required from the victim. Therefore,
Mental stability can be tested from the viewpoint of how well a person can maintain a state of concentration on symbol retrieval tasks while resisting auditory stimuli as interfering stimuli. It is also possible to test mental dispersion ability from the perspective of whether or not one can effectively distribute consciousness between symbol search tasks and response tasks to auditory stimuli.

According to the seventh invention, an intelligence test can be performed that focuses on a memory test and a form perception test.

According to the eighth invention, it is possible to test limb coordination ability, multiple information processing ability, jJA reaction, mental concentration, mental stability, mental dispersion, memory, and form perception ability with one device. .

(Embodiments) Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

First, the configuration of the device will be explained.

FIG. 1 shows the overall appearance of this embodiment, and FIGS. 2 and 3 show the relative positional relationship with the examinee in a state where the examinee is in position, together with a reference dimension example. This device is composed of a main body part 1 and an operation part 3 installed at a location apart from the main body part 1. The main body 1 includes an examination table 5, and a seat 7 for a patient is installed in front of the table 5. This seat 7 can be adjusted in position forward and backward and up and down depending on the person's physique. There are three CRT9Fs in front of the inspection table 3.
, 9L. 9R are installed, and are located in front of seat 7, diagonally to the left, and diagonally to the right, respectively. These three CRT9s
F, 9L, and 9R are arranged so as to almost completely fit within the left and right visual field of the subject in position.

A TV camera 11 and heart rate display light 13 are installed on the top of the front CRT 9F, and an alarm light 1 is installed on the top of the left CRT 9L.
5, a speaker 17 is attached to the upper part of the right CRT 9R.

On the inspection table 5, there are two left and right joysticks 19L, 19R and four types of response switches 21, 23.
, 25 and 27 are attached respectively. The first response switch 21 consists of 20 pushbutton switches displaying numbers O to 9 and alphabets A to J, and the second response switch 23 consists of four pushbutton switches displaying numbers 1 to 4. The third response switch 25 consists of two push-button switches displaying the alphabets H and L, and the fourth response switch 27 is a single push-button switch. Furthermore, two rudder pedals are arranged below the inspection table 1. While in position, the subject should hold both f. Alternatively, the joystick 19 and response switches 21 to 27 may be operated with one hand, or the rudder pedals 29 may be operated with both feet.

The operation unit 3 includes an operation table 31, on which a control personal computer 33, a data monitor 35,
A keyboard 37, three δ-Midorikawa printers, a magnetic tape unit 41 for data storage, and a TV monitor 43 for observing the subject are installed.

A rack 45 containing various control boards, amplifiers, power supplies, etc. is placed under the table 31, and these are connected to various devices of the main body by wiring 47.

FIG. 4 shows the connection relationships of various devices in this embodiment. A keyboard 37, three recording printers, and a data monitor 35 are connected to the control personal computer 33. Further, in the expansion slot 51 of this personal computer 33, a RAM board 5 for memory expansion is provided.
3 and a magnetic tape interface board 55 are inserted, and a data storage magnetic tape unit 41 is connected to the magnetic tape interface board 55.

Furthermore, this personal computer 33 includes various control boards in the rack 45, that is, a parallel input/output board 57, five A/D conversion boards, and a display board 61.
, 63, 65 and a sound board 67 are connected.

The parallel human output board 57 includes a heart rate display light 13,
An alarm light 15 and response switches 21 to 27 are connected. The parallel human output board 57 turns on/off the heart rate display light 13 and alarm light 15 according to signals from the personal computer 33, and also turns on/off the response switch 21.
27 is detected and the personal computer 33 is notified.

A pickup 73 is connected to the A/D conversion board 59 via six amplifiers and a head amplifier 7l, and an amplifier 75 is connected to the A/D conversion board 59.
A joystick 19L119R and a rudder pedal 29 are connected to each other via. The pickup 73 is attached to the subject's body, for example, the ear shell, and detects the heartbeat. The heartbeat signal from the pickup 73 and the operation signals from the joysticks 19L, 19R and the two rudder pedals are each amplified and input to five A/D conversion boards. The five A/D conversion boards convert these input signals into digital codes according to the amplitude and send them to the personal computer 33.

The display boards 61, 63, and 65 have CRT9F
, 9L, and 9R are connected to each other.

Each display board 61, 63, 65 is connected to each CRT9F, 9L, 9R under the control of the personal computer 33.
to drive.

The speaker 17 is connected to the sound board 67 via a power amplifier 77. The sound board 67 synthesizes audio according to commands from the personal computer 33 and outputs it to the speaker 17 via the power amplifier 77.

A TV monitor 43 for observing the subject is connected to the TV camera 11.

Next, the operation of this embodiment will be explained.

The tests are 9N from test 1 to test 9 as shown in Table 1.
It consists of sub-tests of the same category. Selection of each sub-test is performed using the keyboard 37. First, when you start up the system, the test selection screen shown in Figure 5 appears on the data monitor 3.
5. When a certain sub-test is selected from this screen using the keyboard 37, a specification selection screen is displayed on the monitor 35 that displays the contents of the preset specifications for that sub-test.
displayed above. As an example, FIG. 6 shows a specification selection screen when inspection 1 is selected. After a specification is selected from this screen, its lower-level inspection is executed by an execution command from the keyboard 37.

Referring to Table 1, lPEf of each sub-test is as follows.

Tests 1 to 3 are tests mainly related to visual and limb coordination abilities. Test 1 is called the r11 pure coordination test, and its purpose is to test only coordination ability. In this test, the subject looks at the test screen displayed on the CRT 9F in front of him and controls the movement of both sides using the gigoi sticks 19L, 19R or two rudder pedals. Test 2 is called the complex response test, which tests not only the ability to cooperate but also the ability to process multiple information.

In this test, in addition to performing control tasks similar to Test 1, the subject must respond to instrument movements and calculation questions displayed on the left and right CRTs 9L and 9R. Test 3 is called the irregular coordination test, and tests not only coordination ability and multiple information processing ability, but also mental capacity. In this test, in addition to redundant tasks similar to test 2, the test subject also has to deal with irregular movements that occur during the test screen in front of him,
must respond to auditory stimuli provided by

Test 4 is called the impatience reaction test, and tests the accuracy of judgment regarding time perception, that is, whether it is appropriate, has a tendency to become anxious, or has a tendency to delay. In this test, a target moving in a straight line at a constant velocity or moving at a constant velocity is displayed on the CRT 9F in front, and is hidden in the middle. The examiner predicts the time when the target will arrive at the goal and presses the response switch 27 at that time.

Tests 5 and 6 are mainly tests related to mental concentration. Test 5 is called the consciousness concentration test, and tests mental concentration and mental stability. In this test, the subject is placed in front of C.
Look at the 49 randomly arranged numbers displayed on the RT9F, find the number in descending order, and answer its coordinates using the response switch 21. Test 6 is called the consciousness distribution test, and tests the mental dispersion ability, that is, the ability to distribute attention, and the degree of mental stability. In this test, the subject must identify two types of pure tones given from the speaker 17 and respond using the response switch 25 in parallel with the same search task as in Test 5.

Tests 7 and 8 fall under the category of intelligence tests.

Test 7 is called a memory test and tests short-term memory. The examinee looks at several numbers, letters, and figures displayed on the CRTQF in front of him for a certain period of time, and after a few seconds responds with the response switch 23 while the numbers are displayed on the CRT9F, or presses the screener 1.
Hear a several-digit number from 7 and reproduce the number with the response switch 21 after a few seconds. Test 8 is called a cognitive test and tests the speed and accuracy of form perception. The subject is
Compare and match a pair of number strings, character strings, or figure strings displayed on the front CRT 9F, and respond with a match/mismatch switch 25
Answer with.

Test 9 is called a reaction time test, and tests the physiological reaction time to sensory and auditory stimuli. The examiner is Subika 17.
The response switch 25 responds to the auditory stimulus from the alarm light and the visual stimulus from the alarm light 15.

During each of the above sub-tests, the subject's heart rate is measured,
This is fed back to the subject by the heartbeat display light 13. Due to this biofeedback, mentally unstable people tend to become more unstable. Therefore,
Compared to simply measuring heartbeats, mental stability can be predicted with higher accuracy.

Next, each sub-test will be explained in detail.

Test 1: Simple coordination test FIG. 7 shows an example of an inspection screen in this inspection.

The inspection screen is displayed only on the front CRT9F.

On the screen, a circular target a moves at a constant speed on a trajectory indicated by a chain line (not displayed on the actual screen).

A circular target b is stationary at the center of the screen.

The +-shaped cursor A is linked to the operation of the joystick 19R or 19L. The type 1 cursor B moves slowly left and right with a large amplitude near the center of the screen, and is linked to the operation of the two rudder pedals. The examiner operates the joystick 19R or 19L so that the cursor A is always positioned within the circularly moving target a, and also operates the two ladder pedals so that the reciprocating cursor B does not come out of the width of the target b.

By selecting the specifications, the size of the cursor A, the size of the target a, the moving direction, the moving speed, the moving radius, the moving speed of the cursor B, the moving amplitude, and the size of the target b can be selected from a plurality of variations. The relationship between the operating amount and operating direction of one joystick and the rudder pedal 29 and the moving speed and moving direction of the cursors A and B is also variable. By intentionally changing these specifications (particularly the relationship between the operating direction and the moving direction) during the test, the ability to adapt to new circumstances can also be tested.

Joystick 19L. The interlocking relationship between the two rudder pedals 19R and cursors A and B, that is, the relationship between the joysticks 19L and 19R and the rudder pedal 29 to which the cursors A and B are interlocked is also variable. It is also possible to divide the ten-shaped cursor A into two elements, "-°" and "B," and to have each element linked to a separate joystick. In this case, a more advanced level of coordination can be tested by controlling both hands separately.

Furthermore, a time lag can be inserted between the operation of the joystick 19 and the rudder pedal 29 and the movement of the cursors A and B. The length of this time lag is also variable. By inserting a time lag, the ability to predict the future and proactively maneuver can be tested.

FIG. 8 is an example of an evaluation screen displayed on the data monitor 35 for evaluating the results of this test 1. Note that the same thing can also be output from the recording printer 39. This screen shows, in order from the top, the difference between cursor A and the center of target a (X kasu, yosuke, the sum of both), the difference between cursor B and the center of target b (X axis), heartbeat, and elapsed time. Is displayed.

Inspection 22 Complex Coordination Test FIG. 9 shows an example of both surfaces of this test. On the front CRT 9F, there is a circular target a that moves uniformly in a circular motion on a dotted line trajectory (not displayed on both sides), and a joystick 19R or a circular target a that moves in a sine wave on a broken line trajectory (not displayed) centered on the circular target a. Ten-shaped cursor A linked to 19L
, a circular target similar to Test 1 and an L-shaped cursor B are displayed. The subject operates the joystick 19R or 19L and the two rudder pedals so that the cursor A is placed within the target a and the cursor B is not deviated from the width of the target b. At the same time, four gauges are displayed on the left CRT 9L, each having a single needle, which is normally located at the 12 o'clock position, but occasionally swings to a position 45 degrees to the right at a predetermined frequency. When the subject finds an instrument that shows an abnormality (45 degrees to the right), he presses the corresponding button in the response switch 23. Furthermore, the right CRT9
On R, addition and subtraction problems of one-digit numbers are displayed one after another at a predetermined frequency, and the test subject answers the questions using the response switch 21. Depending on the test subject's response, the meter's needle returns to its original position and the calculation problem disappears. The examinee's main task is to control both front surfaces, and is required to monitor instruments and perform calculations simultaneously as much as possible.

The selection of specifications for the front screen is the same as in Inspection 1.

The amplitude of the sinusoidal motion is also variable. The display size of calculation problems is variable, and the content of the problem can be set arbitrarily.

FIG. 10 is an example of the evaluation screen for this inspection 2.

In addition to display items similar to those for Test 1 (graphs not shown), presentations (broken vA), correct answers (long lines), and incorrect answers (short lines) are displayed for calculation and instrument monitoring.

Test 3: Irregular coordination test FIG. 11 shows the inspection screen for this inspection.

On the screen of the front CRT 9F, the circular target a is stationary at the center of the screen. The ten-shaped cursor A moves on a sinusoidal trajectory centered on a circle with a predetermined radius, as shown by the dashed line trajectory (not displayed on the screen), and suddenly makes irregular leaps at a predetermined frequency. do.

This cursor A is linked to the joystick 19L or 19R. The subject operates the joystick 19L or 19R to place the cursor A within the target a.

The same display as in the case of inspection 2 is displayed on the left and right CRTs 9L and 9R. The subject's main task is to control the front screen, and monitor the instruments and perform calculations at the same time as much as possible.

The center radius of the sine wave trajectory of cursor A on the front screen,
The angular position at which the leaping motion occurs and its amplitude are variable. The angular position where the leaping motion occurs can be set at each position that is a multiple of 45 degrees, assuming that the 12 o'clock position is 0 degrees. If a chisel movement occurs at a position that is a multiple of 45 degrees, the direction of correction will be a combination of left/right and up/down h degrees, requiring a high degree of coordination ability. Other specifications of the front screen conform to Inspection 1. The selection of specifications for the left and right screens is based on Inspection 2.

FIG. 12 is an example of the evaluation screen for this test 3 (graphs are omitted). This is the same as the evaluation screen for Test 2, except that there is no item related to rudder pedal operation.

Test 4: Agitation reaction test Figures 13 and 14 show examples of two types of test screens used in this test. These are displayed on the front CRT9F. On the screen in Figure 13, circular target a is at point A.
It moves in a straight line at a constant velocity towards point C and disappears at point B along the way. The examiner presses the response switch 27 at the moment when he thinks that the target a, which has disappeared, continues to move in a straight line. On the screen shown in Figure 14,
Inside the black circle b, the radial line C rotates at a constant speed from the 12 o'clock position A, disappearing the circle b, and stops at the position B. The subject assumes that the radius line C continues to turn, and makes one revolution for 12n! The response switch 27 is pressed at the moment when it seems that position A of i has been reached.

The speed of the linear and pivoting movements is variable. The direction of the turning movement (clockwise or counterclockwise) can also be selected.

FIG. 15 is an evaluation screen for this test 3. The vertical dashed line indicates the correct expected arrival time, and the subject's response time is indicated by a square.

Test 5: Consciousness concentration test Figure 16 shows the test screen for this test. CRT9 in front
Numbers 0 to 48 randomly arranged in 7 rows and 7 columns are displayed in F, and their coordinates can be specified by alphabets A to G and numbers 1 to 7. The exhibitor searches for numbers from 0 to 40 in order and inputs the coordinates using the response switch 21. For example, D4, F2, F6
,...and so on. The number to be searched for next is displayed at the bottom of the screen, and when the test taker gives a correct answer, a predetermined signal sound is emitted from the speaker 17 and the display of the number to be searched for next is updated.

Any arrangement of numbers can be selected from several arrangements prepared in advance.

FIG. 17 shows the evaluation screen for this test 5. For each number, the input point of a correct answer is displayed as a long line, and the input point of an incorrect answer is displayed as a short line. This allows you to know whether the answer is correct or incorrect, the time required for each answer, and the time required for the entire task. By examining the time required for each answer, it is possible to know the frequency and extent of blocking phenomena, which can serve as powerful data for determining the level of mental stability.

Test 6: Attention Allocation Test In this test, the subject is given the same search task as in Test 5, and two different types of auditory stimuli are given from the speaker 17 at regular time intervals. While performing the search task, the person presenting the information discriminates between the two types of auditory stimuli and responds using the response switch 25. The auditory stimulation uses scales that are similar in pitch to the extent that they cannot be distinguished unless one listens carefully; for example, 104
They are 6Hz and 1244Hz. By using these similar auditory stimuli, the subject needs to concentrate not only on the search task but also on the auditory stimulus.

Therefore, the auditory stimulus functions as a distracting stimulus that affects attentional concentration on the search task. Therefore, it is possible to test the ability to resist disturbing stimuli, that is, the level of mental stability.

It can also test the ability to divide attention between search tasks and auditory stimuli.

The time interval between scale occurrences is variable, and the volume can also be varied.

Other specifications conform to Inspection 5.

FIG. 18 shows the evaluation image of this test 6. In addition to the display items similar to Test 5, regarding the auditory response, the time point at which the scale occurs is displayed as a broken line, the time point at which a correct answer is inputted is displayed as a long line, and the time point at which an incorrect answer is inputted is displayed as a short line. This allows us to determine the accuracy of the auditory response and the time required for the response.

Test 7: Memory test This test consists of a visual test and a hearing test.

Figures 19 and 20 show display screens for visual inspection. First, a question screen as shown in FIG. 19 is displayed on the front CRT 9F, and disappears after a certain period of time. For example, 10 seconds after the problem screen disappears, a selection technique screen as shown in FIG. 20 is displayed. The test subject must identify the five numbers, letters, and letters displayed on both sides of the question.
After memorizing the symbols, select the numbers, letters, and symbols that appear on the question screen Φ from the selection technique screen, and press the response switch 21.
Press the corresponding button.

In the hearing test, a 5- to 9-digit number sequence, for example, is read out from the speaker 17. The reading speed is, for example, one character per second. When the reading of one number sequence is finished, for example, 5 seconds later, the speaker 17 sounds a signal to start a response. When the signal sound is heard, the subject inputs the number sequence read aloud using the response switch 21. During this time, a screen showing only the title of the problem as shown in FIG. 21 is displayed on the CRT 9F.

For both vision and hearing tests, the required number of questions are prepared in advance. Display of problem screen in visual inspection 11! The distance between f is variable. The size of displayed characters, etc. is also variable.

FIG. 22 shows the visual inspection evaluation screen. The display time of the question is shown as a square wave, and below that, correct answers are shown as long lines, and incorrect answers are shown as short lines.

FIG. 23 shows an evaluation screen for a hearing test. At the top, the time point at which each number is read out is indicated by a long line, and the time point at which the cue sound occurs is indicated by a dashed line. Below that, for each number, the correct answer is shown as a long line, and the incorrect answer is shown as a short line.

In addition, the number of correct answers, number of incorrect answers, and number of unknowns are recorded for both the visual and hearing tests.

Test 8: Cognitive test FIGS. 24 and 25 show examples of inspection screens for this inspection.

In this test, pairs of numerical sequences, character strings, or graphical sequences are displayed on the left and right sides of the CRT 9F in front of the patient.

The subject judges whether all the constituent elements are the same between the pairs (ignoring the order), and answers using the response switch 25.

For example, in the example of FIG. 24, the response switch 25
Press “L#” in the example shown in Figure 25, so press “H”.
"Press.

The required number of questions are prepared in advance. A number sequence, etc. is expressed in four or five terms. The size of each number, character, and figure is variable.

FIG. 26 shows the S/F value screen for this test 8. The question display time, that is, the time required to make a decision, is shown as a square wave, and below that, correct answers are shown as long lines, and incorrect answers are shown as short lines. Additionally, the number of responses, the number of correct answers, and the number of incorrect answers are recorded.

Test 9: Reaction Time Test This test consists of a visual r1t pure response test, an auditory 11j pure response test, and a choice response test.

In the visual simple reaction test, the examinee responds to the visual sting a (lit) generated in the alarm light 15 by pressing "H" on the response switch 25 as soon as possible. In the auditory simple response test, an auditory stimulus (for example, 1
046Hz scale), press "L" of the response switch 25 as soon as possible to respond. In the choice reaction test,
Visual and auditory stimuli are presented in random order.

The subject should press the response switch 25 "H" in response to the visual stimulus.
” for auditory stimuli, press “L” to respond. still,
At the same time as the test starts, a test title as shown in FIG. 27 is displayed on the front CRT 9F, and a stimulus is generated several seconds after this title is displayed. The number of seconds is variable.

FIG. 28 shows an evaluation screen for the visual and auditory simple reaction test. The test start is indicated by a vertical line and the stimulus by a square pulse. Below that, the response is indicated by a vertical line.

FIG. 29 shows a selection reaction evaluation screen. The test start is indicated by a vertical line, the visual stimulus is indicated by an upward square pulse, and the auditory stimulus is indicated by a downward square pulse. Below that, correct answers are shown as long lines and incorrect answers are shown as short lines.

In addition, the reaction time, average value, and drift deviation for each test are recorded.

Next, the arithmetic processing performed by the personal computer 33 in each of the above sub-examinations will be explained with reference to the flowcharts shown in FIGS. 30 to 37.

Test 2 will be explained first. Inspection 1 is obtained by omitting the control processing for the left and right screens from the processing of Inspection 2, so the explanation thereof will be omitted.

Referring to Figure 30, first, mark the target a on the front inspection screen.
Then, cursor B is displayed and moved at a set speed along the fth set trajectory (step Sl). Then,
Read the positions of the joystick 19 and the two rudder pedals and correct the positions of cursors A and B accordingly (
Steps S2, S3). In this case, joystick 1
9 and the rudder pedal 29, the faster the moving speed of the cursor A1B becomes.

When the target a comes to the position set for instrument monitoring, a predetermined instrument in the left inspection screen is caused to display an abnormality (step S4). Further, when the Yuichi get a reaches the position set for the calculation problem, the calculation problem prepared in advance is displayed on the right inspection screen (step S5). Then,
The on/off information of each button is read from the response switches 21 and 23 (step S6). Then, the test results, that is, the control results on the front screen and the response results for the left and right screens are displayed on the data monitor screen (step S7).
.

After repeating the above operation a set number of times (step S8), the test results are evaluated using the set method, and the test results and evaluation results are stored in a file in the magnetic tape unit 41 (step S9, SIO ).

Next, the processing of inspection 3 will be explained with reference to FIG. First, cursor A on the front inspection screen is moved along the next trajectory at a set speed.

When the cursor A comes to the position set for irregular movement, the cursor A is instantly moved outward by the set vibration distance (step S12). Next, joystick 1
The position of cursor A is read in and the position of cursor A is corrected (steps S13 and S14).

Also, when cursor A comes to the position set for instrument monitoring and calculation problem, a failure is displayed on the predetermined instrument in the Noi inspection screen, and a predetermined calculation problem is displayed on the stone display screen ( Steps S15, S16). Next, information from the response switches 21 and 23 is read (step S17).
.

The following processes (steps S18 to S21) are the same as those for inspection 2, so description thereof will be omitted.

Next is inspection 4. In the case of linear motion, referring to FIG. 32, first the target a is moved linearly at a uniform speed in the front inspection screen, and is hidden at a predetermined point along the way. Next, the signal from the response switch 27 is read (step S24). The following processing (steps 525 to S27) is performed using the test 'I! t2
It is similar to

The processing in the case of circular motion is also similar to the above, so the explanation will be omitted.

Next, inspection 6 will be explained. It should be noted that the processing of Test 5 is the same as Test 6 without the auditory response processing, so the explanation will be omitted.

Referring to FIG. 33, first, a random number table is displayed on the front inspection screen (step S28), and the number to be searched for is displayed (
step 329). Furthermore, a musical scale is generated from the speaker 17 at set time intervals (step S30). Next, information indicating the coordinate position and the scale discrimination result is read from the response switches 21 and 25 (step S31), and the response status is displayed on the monitor screen (step S32). That's it,
Steps S29 to S32 are repeated a predetermined number of times. The subsequent processing (steps 333 to S35) is similar to inspection 2.

In the visual inspection of inspection 7, referring to FIG. 34, first, a predetermined symbol string is displayed on the front inspection screen for a set time (step S36). Next, options are displayed on the front inspection screen (step S37). Thereafter, information from the response switch 21 is read (step S38). The subsequent process fl (steps S39 to S42) is similar to inspection 2.

Similarly, in the hearing test, referring to FIG. 35, first a set number sequence is read out (step S43), and then information from the response switch 21 is read (step S44). The subsequent processing (steps 545 to S48) is similar to test 2.

In inspection 8, referring to FIG. 36, first, a pair of symbol strings with the set number of digits is displayed on the front inspection screen (step S
49). Next, information from the response switch 25 is read (step 550). Subsequent processing (steps 351 to S
54) is similar to test 2.

Finally, inspection 9 will be explained. Since the visual reaction and auditory reaction tests are processed by rm Iit of the selection reaction test, only the selection reaction test will be explained.

Referring to FIG. 37, after a set time has elapsed from the start of the test, the alarm lamp 15 is turned on or the speaker 17 generates a musical scale according to the setting (step S55).

Next, information from the response switch 25 is read. The following processing (steps 857 to S60) is similar to test 2.

Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described above, it goes without saying that the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. There are countless variations of the layout of the inspection screen and monitor screen. Regarding the number of inspection screens, 3
The number is not limited to 1, but may be 2 or 4. As for the number of sub-tests, some of the sub-tests in the embodiment may be omitted or other sub-tests may be added as necessary.

For example, in the example, regarding form perception, test 8 mainly tests movement discrimination ability, but it is also possible to add sub-tests that independently test the ability to divide and replace figures. be.

(Effects of the Invention) As explained above, according to the present invention, it is possible to test complex limb coordination abilities such as those required for near flight maneuvers. Additionally, multiple information processing ability can be tested. Also, time perception in circular motion can be tested. Furthermore, it is possible to conduct a highly reliable test of mental stability. In addition, intelligence tests that focus on memory and perceptual abilities can be conducted. Furthermore, 1
These tests can be performed using a single device.

[Brief Description of the Drawings] Fig. 1 is a perspective view showing the overall appearance of a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and Fig. 2 is a side view showing the positional relationship between each part of the embodiment and the examiner. , Fig. 3 is a plan view showing the positional relationship between each part of the same embodiment and the subject, Fig. 4 is a system block diagram showing the connection relationship of each device in the same embodiment, and Fig. 5 is an examination selection screen. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the specification selection screen, FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the test screen for the simple coordination test, FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the evaluation screen for the simple coordination test, and FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the evaluation screen for the simple coordination test. The figure shows the test screen for the complex coordination test, Figure 10 shows the evaluation screen for the complex coordination test, Figure 11 shows the test screen for the irregular coordination test, and Figure 12 shows the irregular coordination test. Figure 13 is a diagram showing the evaluation screen of the cooperative test; Figure 13 is a diagram showing the test screen using linear motion in the agitation reaction test; Figure 14 is a diagram showing the test screen using circular motion in the agitation reaction test; Figure 15 shows the evaluation screen for the agitation reaction test, Figure 16 shows the test screen for the consciousness concentration test and consciousness distribution test, Figure 17 shows the evaluation screen for the consciousness concentration test, and Figure 18 shows the evaluation screen for the consciousness concentration test. Figure 19 shows the test screen showing memory questions in the visual memory test; Figure 20 shows the test screen showing options in the visual memory test. , FIG. 21 is a diagram showing the test screen for the auditory memory test, FIG. 22 is a diagram showing the evaluation screen for the visual memory test, and FIG. 23 is a diagram showing the evaluation screen for the auditory memory test.
Figures 24 and 25 are diagrams showing the test screen for the cognitive test, Figure 26 is a diagram showing the evaluation screen for the cognitive test, Figure 27 is a diagram showing the test screen for the reaction test, and Figure 28 is a diagram showing the 111 pure test screen. The figure showing the evaluation screen of the reaction test, Prisoner 29 is the figure showing the evaluation screen of the selective reaction test, and the figure 30 is? 12tI! A flowchart showing the processing procedure of a personal computer in the k-coordination test, FIG. 31 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure in the irregular coordination test, FIG. 32 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure in the agitation reaction test, and FIG. 33 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure in the agitation reaction test. Flowchart showing processing procedure in inspection, No. 34
Figure 35 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure in the visual memory test, Figure 35 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure in the auditory TA test, Figure 36 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure in the cognitive test, and Figure 37 is the processing procedure in the choice reaction test. It is a flowchart which shows. 9...CRT, 11...TV camera for photographing the examiner,
13... Heart rate display light, 15... Warning light, 1
7... Subika, 19... Joystick, 21
, 23, 25, 27...Response switch, 29...Rudder petal, 33...Controlling personal computer, 35...Data monitor, 37...Keyboard, 3
1...Recording printer, 41...Magnetic tape unit for data storage, 43...TV monitor for patient observation, 73...Big up.

Claims (1)

[Claims] 1. A device for testing the qualifications required of a flight pilot, comprising: a test screen display device having a screen; and at least one pair of display devices that drive the display device to make a predetermined relative movement. means for displaying a coordination test image representing a cursor and a target on the screen; at least one stick for inputting hand operation information; a pedal for inputting foot operation information; and the stick. and cursor moving means for moving the cursor in response to operation information from the pedal; and means for recording a relative positional relationship between the cursor and the target. 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the cooperative inspection image includes a first cursor and a first target making a first relative movement, and a second cursor and a second target making a second relative movement. a target is displayed, the cursor moving means moves the first cursor according to operation information from the stick, and moves the second cursor according to operation information from the pedal, and the recording means A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device that records a relative positional relationship between the first cursor and the first target, and a relative positional relationship between the second cursor and the second target. . 3. The device according to claim 1, further comprising: a first stick for inputting right hand operation information; and a second stick for inputting left hand operation information; and a second element, the cursor moving means moves the first element according to operation information from the first stick, and moves the first element according to operation information from the second stick. A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device characterized by moving the second element. 4. The flight maneuver aptitude testing device according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of different motions can be selected as the relative motion. 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a combination of a regular motion along a predetermined trajectory and an irregular motion suddenly deviating from the trajectory can be selected as the relative motion. Flight maneuver aptitude testing device. 6. The flight aptitude test device according to claim 1, wherein the cursor moving means inserts a predetermined time lag between receiving the operation information and moving the cursor. 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a monitoring screen display device having a screen; and means for driving the monitoring screen display device to display a monitoring image that sporadically exhibits abnormal operation on the screen of the monitoring screen display device. and a response switch for inputting response information corresponding to the abnormal operation; and means for receiving the response information and recording its validity and temporal relative relationship with the abnormal operation. Flight maneuver aptitude testing device. 8. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a question screen display device having a screen; and means for driving the question screen display device to sporadically display images representing predetermined questions on the screen of the question screen display device. A flight maneuver aptitude testing device further comprising: an answer switch for inputting an answer to the question; and means for receiving the answer and recording its correctness or wrongness and the temporal relationship with the question. . 9. A device for testing the qualifications required of a flight pilot, comprising: a test screen display device having a screen; and a device for driving the test screen display device to move along a predetermined trajectory including a circular trajectory. means for displaying on the screen an impatience reaction test image representing a target hidden in the middle of a predetermined trajectory; a response switch for inputting response information at a predicted time point when the target reaches a predetermined position on the trajectory; A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device comprising: means for receiving response information and recording an error at the predicted time point. 10. A device for testing the qualifications required of a flight pilot, comprising: a test screen display device having a screen; and a consciousness concentration screen displaying a plurality of randomly arranged symbols for driving the test screen display device. means for displaying an inspection image on the screen; a coordinate switch for inputting coordinate information of the symbol; and a time interval and a total time interval during which each of the symbols is searched in a predetermined order in response to the coordinate information. A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device characterized by having: a means for recording time; and a means for recording time. 11. The device according to claim 10, comprising: an acoustic device that sporadically generates an auditory stimulus; a response switch for inputting response information corresponding to the auditory stimulus; A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device further comprising: means for recording a temporal relative relationship with a stimulus; 12. A device for testing the qualifications required of a flight pilot, comprising: a test screen display device having a screen; and driving the test screen display device to display a memory test image representing a predetermined visual memory problem and a predetermined test screen display device. means for selectively displaying a perceptual test image representing a form perception problem on the screen; an answer switch for inputting an answer to each of the visual memory problem and the perceptual problem; A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device comprising: means for recording correctness or failure. 13. The apparatus according to claim 12, further comprising: an acoustic device that generates a predetermined auditory memory question; a response switch for inputting an answer to the auditory memory question; and a device that receives the answer from the response switch and records whether it is correct or not. A flight maneuvering aptitude testing device further comprising: means for determining; 14. A device for testing the qualifications required of a flight pilot, comprising a first screen display device having a first screen, a second screen display device having a second screen, and a third screen. A third screen display device, and the first screen display device are driven to display a predetermined cooperation test image, a predetermined agitation reaction test image, a predetermined consciousness concentration test image,
means for selectively displaying a predetermined memory test image or a predetermined perceptual test image; means for driving the second screen display device to display a predetermined monitoring image on the second screen; means for driving a screen display device to display a predetermined question image on the third screen; an audio device for generating a predetermined auditory stimulus and a predetermined auditory memory problem; and a means for inputting hand operation information. a stick, a pedal for inputting foot operation information, means for receiving operation information from the stick and the pedal to control movement of the cooperative image, the agitation reaction test image, and the consciousness concentration test image. , a response switch for inputting response information for each of the memory test image, the perceptual test image, the monitoring image, the question image, the auditory stimulus, and the auditory memory question; and each of the operation information and the response information. A flight maneuvering aptitude test device comprising: test result recording means for recording test results based on the respective test results.