JPH03209599A - Detector for abnormal traffic flow - Google Patents

Detector for abnormal traffic flow

Info

Publication number
JPH03209599A
JPH03209599A JP253190A JP253190A JPH03209599A JP H03209599 A JPH03209599 A JP H03209599A JP 253190 A JP253190 A JP 253190A JP 253190 A JP253190 A JP 253190A JP H03209599 A JPH03209599 A JP H03209599A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
traffic
traffic flow
state amount
abnormal
traffic state
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP253190A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2893544B2 (en
Inventor
Hisakuni Yokosuka
横須賀 久訓
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Signal Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nippon Signal Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Signal Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Signal Co Ltd
Priority to JP253190A priority Critical patent/JP2893544B2/en
Publication of JPH03209599A publication Critical patent/JPH03209599A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2893544B2 publication Critical patent/JP2893544B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To detect abnormal traffic flow by deciding the traffic flow is abnormal when a real traffic state amount detected after the lapse of prescribed time is out of a range between upper and lower set threshold values. CONSTITUTION:Based on the forecasted value of a traffic state amount forecasting means D to forecast the traffic state amount after the lapse of prescribed time from a current time point based on current traffic state amount data detected by a traffic state amount detecting means B, a threshold value setting means E sets the upper and lower threshold values for abnormal traffic flow after the lapse of prescribed time. Based on these set threshold values, a traffic flow abnormality deciding means F decides whether the real traffic state amount detected by the traffic state amount detecting means B is out of the range between the upper and lower threshold values after the lapse of prescribed time or not, and when the traffic state amount is out of the range, it is decided that the traffic flow is abnormal. Thus, the abnormal traffic flow which lower traffic capacity by an unexpected accident can be detected.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〈産業上の利用分野〉 本発明は、異常交通流の検出装置に関する。[Detailed description of the invention] <Industrial application field> The present invention relates to an abnormal traffic flow detection device.

〈従来の技術〉 従来の交通流の監視方式は、道路沿いに設置した車両感
知器からの車両感知データを基に算出された交通流の速
度を使用して、閾値による判定方式を採用している。
<Conventional technology> Conventional traffic flow monitoring methods employ a threshold-based determination method using traffic flow speed calculated based on vehicle detection data from vehicle detectors installed along the road. There is.

即ち、道路沿いに設置した超音波式の車両感知器で車両
検知を行い、車両感知器からの出力に基づいて、所定時
間内における車両検知時間と、車両台数とを求める。こ
れらのデータから、道路の一地点における単位時間当り
の車両検知時間割合(以下、占有率とする)0と、同し
く道路の一地点における単位時間当りの車両台数(以下
、交通量とする)Qとを算出する。更に、前記占有率○
を密度(道路の単位距離内に存在する車両台数)Kと見
なし、次式からその地点における車両の速度■を推定す
る。
That is, a vehicle is detected by an ultrasonic vehicle detector installed along the road, and the vehicle detection time and the number of vehicles within a predetermined time are determined based on the output from the vehicle detector. From these data, we can calculate that the vehicle detection time ratio per unit time at one point on the road (hereinafter referred to as occupancy rate) is 0 and the number of vehicles per unit time at one point on the road (hereinafter referred to as traffic volume). Calculate Q. Furthermore, the occupancy rate ○
is assumed to be the density (the number of vehicles existing within a unit distance of the road) K, and the speed of the vehicle at that point is estimated from the following equation.

Q=K ・ ■ そして、第7回に示すように、予め渋滞か否をを判定す
るための閾値V。を設定し、演算された現在の速度■と
前記閾値V。とを比較してV<V。
Q=K ・■ And, as shown in the seventh section, the threshold value V for determining whether there is a traffic jam or not in advance. , the calculated current speed ■ and the threshold value V. Compare with V<V.

であれば渋滞と判定していた。If so, it would have been determined that there was a traffic jam.

〈発明が解決しようとする課題〉 しかしながら、このような従来方式では、渋滞か否かの
判別しかできず、異常交通流(事故等の突発事象によっ
て交通容量の低下した交通流)の検出はできなかった。
<Problem to be solved by the invention> However, such conventional methods can only determine whether there is a traffic jam or not, but cannot detect abnormal traffic flows (traffic flows whose traffic capacity has decreased due to sudden events such as accidents). There wasn't.

例えば、第7図において、X点やY点で突発事象が発生
して速度が急低下したとしても何ら対応できず、現在の
速度値■が閾値V、を横切ったときに渋滞の発生成いは
消滅を検出するだけであった。
For example, in Fig. 7, even if an unexpected event occurs at point only detected extinction.

本発明は上記の事情に鑑みてなされたもので、従来対応
できなかった異常交通流の検出が可能な異常交通流の検
出装置を提供することを目的とする。また、異常交通流
の発生原因となる突発事象の発生場所及び時間を知るこ
とのできる異常交通流の検出装置を提供することを目的
とする。
The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and it is an object of the present invention to provide an abnormal traffic flow detection device that can detect abnormal traffic flows that could not be handled conventionally. Another object of the present invention is to provide an abnormal traffic flow detection device that can determine the location and time of occurrence of an unexpected event that causes abnormal traffic flow.

く課題を解決するための手段〉 このため本発明は、第1図に示すように、道路上の車両
を検知する車両検知手段Aと、該車両検知手段への出力
に基づいて一定時間毎に交通状態量を検出する交通状態
量検出手段Bと、該交通状態量検出手段Bで検出された
交通状態量と予め設定された渋滞判別用閾値とを比較し
て渋滞か否かを判定する渋滞判定手段Cと、前記交通状
態量検出手段Bで検出された現在までの交通状態量デー
タに基づいて現時点から所定時間後の交通状態量を予測
する交通状態量予測手段りと、該交通状態量予測手段り
の予測値に基づいて前記所定時間後の異常交通流判定用
上下閾値を設定する閾値設定手段Eと、前記所定時間後
において前記交通状態量検出手段Bで検出された実際の
交通状態量が前記閾値設定手段Eで設定された上下閾値
間の範囲外にあるとき交通流が異常であると判定する交
通流異常判定手段Fとを備えて構成した。
Means for Solving the Problems> Therefore, as shown in FIG. A traffic state amount detection means B that detects a traffic state amount, and a traffic jam that determines whether or not there is a traffic jam by comparing the traffic state amount detected by the traffic state amount detection means B with a preset threshold for determining a traffic jam. a determining means C; a traffic state quantity prediction means for predicting a traffic state quantity after a predetermined time from the present time based on the traffic state quantity data detected by the traffic state quantity detection means B; and the traffic state quantity. Threshold value setting means E for setting upper and lower thresholds for abnormal traffic flow determination after the predetermined time based on predicted values of the prediction means; and actual traffic conditions detected by the traffic state amount detection means B after the predetermined time. The traffic flow abnormality determination means F determines that the traffic flow is abnormal when the amount is outside the range between the upper and lower threshold values set by the threshold value setting means E.

また、第1図の破線で示すように、前記車両検知手段A
、交通状態量検出手段B、渋滞判定手段C2交通状態量
予測手段り、閾値設定手段E及び交通流異常判定手段F
とからなる組Gを、車両検知手段Aを道路に沿って間隔
を設けて設置して少なくとも2組設けると共に、互いに
隣接する組Gのそれぞれの交通流異常判定手段Fの判定
結果を比較する比較手段Hを備えて構成するようにした
Further, as shown by the broken line in FIG. 1, the vehicle detection means A
, traffic state amount detection means B, traffic jam determination means C2, traffic state amount prediction means, threshold value setting means E, and traffic flow abnormality determination means F
At least two sets of vehicle detection means A are installed at intervals along the road, and the determination results of the traffic flow abnormality determination means F of the adjacent sets of G are compared. The device is configured to include means H.

く作用〉 上記の構成において、交通状態量検出手段Bは、道路上
の車両を検知する車両検知手段Aの出力に基づいて一定
時間毎に交通状態量を検出する。
Function> In the above configuration, the traffic state quantity detection means B detects the traffic state quantity at regular intervals based on the output of the vehicle detection means A that detects vehicles on the road.

渋滞判定手段Cは、従来と同様にして交通状態量検出手
段Bで検出された交通状態量と予め設定された渋滞判別
用閾値とを比較して渋滞か否かを判定する。
The traffic jam determining means C compares the traffic state quantity detected by the traffic state quantity detecting means B with a preset congestion determination threshold value in the same manner as in the past to determine whether or not there is a traffic jam.

また、前記交通状態量検出手段Bで検出された現在まで
の交通状態量データに基づいて現時点から所定時間後の
交通状態量を予測する交通状態量予測手段りの予測値に
基づいて、閾値設定手段已により前記所定時間後の異常
交通流判定用上下閾値を設定し、この設定された閾値に
基づいて、交通流異常判定手段Fは、所定時間後におい
て前記交通状態量検出手段Bで検出された実際の交通状
態量が前記上下閾値間の範囲外にあるか否かを判定し、
範囲外にあるときに交通流が異常であると判定する。
Further, a threshold value is set based on a predicted value of a traffic state amount prediction means that predicts a traffic state amount after a predetermined time from the present time based on the traffic state amount data detected by the traffic state amount detection means B up to the present time. The means sets upper and lower thresholds for abnormal traffic flow determination after the predetermined time, and based on the set thresholds, the traffic flow abnormality determination means F determines whether the traffic flow abnormality is detected by the traffic state quantity detection means B after the predetermined time. determining whether the actual traffic state quantity is outside the range between the upper and lower thresholds;
It is determined that the traffic flow is abnormal when it is outside the range.

これにより、渋滞及び非渋滞に拘らず、従来検出できな
かった突発事象に起因して交通容量が低下する異常交通
流の検出が可能となる。
This makes it possible to detect abnormal traffic flows where traffic capacity is reduced due to unexpected events that could not be detected conventionally, regardless of whether the traffic is congested or not.

また、道路に沿って間隔を設けて設置した互いに隣接す
る車両検知手段Aに対応するそれぞれの交通流異常判定
手段Fからの判定結果を、比較手段Hで比較する。
Further, the comparison means H compares the determination results from the respective traffic flow abnormality determination means F corresponding to the mutually adjacent vehicle detection means A installed at intervals along the road.

これにより、異常交通流の発生場所及び時間を知ること
が可能となる。
This makes it possible to know the location and time when abnormal traffic flow occurs.

〈実施例〉 以下、本発明の一実施例を図面に基づいて説明する。<Example> Hereinafter, one embodiment of the present invention will be described based on the drawings.

本実施例の構成を示す第2図において、道路1に沿って
所定の間隔を設けて車両検知手段としての超音波式の車
両感知器2.3を設置しである。
In FIG. 2 showing the configuration of this embodiment, ultrasonic vehicle detectors 2.3 as vehicle detection means are installed at predetermined intervals along a road 1.

該車両感知器2,3は、道路lの上方に設けた送受器2
A、3Aと感知器本体2B、3Bとからなり、送受器2
A、3Aから道路1に向けて超音波を放射し、その地点
を車両が通過した時としないときとでその反射波の受信
に時間差が生じることを利用して車両の有無を検知する
。そして、車両を感知したときには、感知器本体2B、
3Bから、例えばHl/ベルの感知出力が発生する。
The vehicle detectors 2 and 3 are equipped with a transmitter/receiver 2 installed above the road l.
Consisting of A, 3A and sensor bodies 2B, 3B, the transmitter/receiver 2
Ultrasonic waves are emitted toward the road 1 from A and 3A, and the presence or absence of a vehicle is detected by utilizing the time difference that occurs in the reception of the reflected waves depending on whether or not a vehicle has passed through that point. When a vehicle is detected, the sensor body 2B,
3B generates a sensing output of, for example, Hl/Bell.

コントロールユニット4は、内蔵したマイクロコンピュ
ータにより、前記車両感知器2,3からの入力データに
基づいて、第3図及び第4図に示すフローチャートに従
って渋滞と異常交通流の各検出及び交通流異常判定用閾
値の設定を行う。
The control unit 4 uses a built-in microcomputer to detect traffic jams and abnormal traffic flows and determines traffic flow abnormalities according to the flowcharts shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 based on the input data from the vehicle detectors 2 and 3. Set the threshold for

尚、本実施例において、交通状態量検出手段。In this embodiment, the traffic state quantity detection means.

渋滞判定手段、交通状態量予測手段、閾値設定手段、交
通流異常判定手段及び比較手段としての機能は、第3図
及び第4図のフローチャートに示すように、ソフトウェ
ア的に備えられている。
The functions of a traffic jam determination means, a traffic state amount prediction means, a threshold value setting means, a traffic flow abnormality determination means, and a comparison means are provided in the form of software, as shown in the flowcharts of FIGS. 3 and 4.

第3図のフローチャートを参照して本実施例の渋滞及び
異常交通流の検出動作について説明する。
The operation for detecting congestion and abnormal traffic flow in this embodiment will be explained with reference to the flowchart in FIG.

ステップ1(図中31と記す。以下同様)では、一定時
間(例えば5分)毎の車両感知器2,3からのデータを
入力する。
In step 1 (denoted as 31 in the figure; the same applies hereinafter), data from the vehicle sensors 2 and 3 at fixed time intervals (for example, 5 minutes) are input.

ステップ2では、入力されたデータに基づいて交通状態
量、本実施例では速度Vを従来と同様にして算出する。
In step 2, the traffic state quantity, in this embodiment, the speed V, is calculated in the same way as in the conventional method based on the input data.

即ち、入力データから占有率Oと、交通量Qとを算出し
、占有率0を密度Kに置き換えて、Q=K・■ の関係式を用いて速度■を算出する。
That is, the occupancy rate O and the traffic volume Q are calculated from the input data, the occupancy rate 0 is replaced by the density K, and the speed ■ is calculated using the relational expression Q=K·■.

ステップ3では、ステップ2で算出された現在の交通状
態量即ち速度■が、第4図のフローチャートに従って前
回までの入力速度■データから予測した予測速度■2に
基づいて設定された交通流異常判定用の上限閾値■2+
αと下限閾値■2αとの間の範囲内にあるかどうかによ
り交通流が異常か否かを判定する。
In step 3, the current traffic state quantity, that is, the speed calculated in step 2 is changed to the traffic flow abnormality judgment set based on the previous input speed ■predicted speed predicted from the data according to the flowchart in Figure 4. Upper threshold for ■2+
It is determined whether the traffic flow is abnormal or not depending on whether the traffic flow is within the range between α and the lower limit threshold value ■2α.

そして、実測値Vと予測値V2との誤差e (=V−V
、)が、−α≦e≦αのときは交通流異常無しと判定(
No)Lステップ11に進む。一方、e〉±αのときは
交通流異常有りと判定(YES)してステップ4に進む
Then, the error e between the measured value V and the predicted value V2 (=V-V
, ) is -α≦e≦α, it is determined that there is no traffic flow abnormality (
No) L Proceed to step 11. On the other hand, when e>±α, it is determined that there is an abnormality in traffic flow (YES) and the process proceeds to step 4.

ステップ4では、実測値■を予め設定された渋滞判定用
閾値V0と比較して渋滞か否かを判定する。ここで、V
<Voであれば渋滞と判定されステ・ノブ5に進み、■
≧■。であればステップ9に進む。
In step 4, it is determined whether or not there is a traffic jam by comparing the actual measurement value ■ with a preset threshold value V0 for traffic congestion determination. Here, V
If it is <Vo, it will be determined that there is a traffic jam and proceed to Ste Nobu 5, ■
≧■. If so, proceed to step 9.

ステップ5では、隣接する車両感知器からのデータに基
づく交通流異常判定結果との比較を行い異常交通流の発
生位置と時間を確認する。
In step 5, a comparison is made with the traffic flow abnormality determination result based on data from an adjacent vehicle sensor to confirm the location and time of occurrence of the abnormal traffic flow.

例えば、車両感知器3.2からの入力データに基づく異
常判定結果がそれぞれ第5図の(A)。
For example, the abnormality determination results based on the input data from the vehicle sensor 3.2 are shown in FIG. 5(A).

(B)であったとすると、両地点を比較した場合に、図
中のTの期間で車両感知器2側の地点の速度が低下して
いるが、車両感知器3側の地点の速度は低下していない
。これにより、車両感知器3側では車両が今までと同様
の傾向で流れているのに対して車両感知器2側では今ま
でとは異なる車両の流れになっていることがわかり、こ
の間の場所で交通流の異常が発生していることがわかる
Assuming (B), when comparing both points, the speed at the point on the vehicle detector 2 side has decreased during the period T in the figure, but the speed at the point on the vehicle sensor 3 side has decreased. I haven't. As a result, it can be seen that on the vehicle detector 3 side, vehicles are flowing in the same manner as before, but on the vehicle sensor 2 side, the flow of vehicles is different from before. It can be seen that abnormalities in traffic flow are occurring.

ステップ6では、現在までの速度データを予め記憶させ
である本地点における通常の交通流傾向を示す過去のデ
ータと比較して、自然渋滞か突発事象による渋滞かを検
討する。
In step 6, the current speed data is stored in advance and compared with past data showing normal traffic flow trends at this location to examine whether the congestion is natural or caused by an unexpected event.

ここで、過去のデータとしては、例えば曜日毎の時間別
データベース等を用いる。この際、前の週の同じ曜日が
休日の場合には、更にその前の同じ曜日のデータを用い
ることとする。尚、この他のデータベースとしては体祭
日、5.10日を除いた平日のデータベース等が考えら
れる。
Here, as the past data, for example, an hourly database for each day of the week is used. At this time, if the same day of the week in the previous week is a holiday, data on the same day in the previous week is used. Note that other databases may include a database for weekdays excluding festival days, May 10th, and the like.

そして、過去のデータと同様の傾向であれば自然渋滞と
判断し、異なった傾向であれば突発事象の発生による渋
滞と判断して、それぞれステップ7またはステップ8に
進み、自然渋滞または突発事象の発生による渋滞の表示
出力をそれぞれ発生してドライバに知らせる。
Then, if the trend is similar to past data, it is determined that the traffic jam is natural, and if the trend is different, it is determined that the traffic jam is due to the occurrence of an unexpected event, and the process proceeds to step 7 or step 8, respectively. A display output is generated to notify the driver of the traffic jam caused by the occurrence of the traffic jam.

ステップ4で渋滞でないと判定されステップ9に進んだ
場合は、ステップ5と同様にして異常交通流の発生湯所
及び時間の確認を行う。
If it is determined in step 4 that there is no traffic jam and the process proceeds to step 9, the location and time at which the abnormal traffic flow occurs is confirmed in the same manner as in step 5.

ステップ10では、渋滞発生の注意報の表示出力を発生
して、ドライバに対して渋滞になる虞れがあることを知
らせる。
In step 10, a traffic jam warning message is generated to notify the driver that there is a risk of traffic congestion.

また、ステップ3で交通流が異常でないと判定されステ
ップ11に進んだときも、ステップ4と同様にして渋滞
か否かの判定を行い、渋滞でないときはステップ1に戻
り、渋滞と判定されたときは何ら交通流に異常が無く渋
滞になったことからステップ7に進んで自然渋滞の表示
出力を発生する。
Also, when it is determined in step 3 that the traffic flow is not abnormal and the process proceeds to step 11, it is determined whether or not there is a traffic jam in the same way as in step 4. If there is no traffic jam, the process returns to step 1 and it is determined that there is a traffic jam. At this time, there is no abnormality in the traffic flow and a traffic jam has occurred, so the process proceeds to step 7 and a display output of a natural traffic jam is generated.

次に、第4図のフローチャートに従って前述の渋滞及び
異常検出動作に使用する交通流異常判定用の閾値の設定
動作を説明する。
Next, the setting operation of the threshold value for traffic flow abnormality determination used in the above-mentioned congestion and abnormality detection operation will be explained according to the flowchart of FIG.

ステップ21では、一定時間(例えば5分)毎に車両感
知器から入力された現在までの速度■のデータに基づい
て所定時間(例えば5分)後の予測速度■2の設定を行
う。この予測方法としては、例えば現在までの速度デー
タの平均或いは移動子均等とする。
In step 21, a predicted speed (2) after a predetermined time (for example, 5 minutes) is set based on the data of the current speed (2) inputted from the vehicle sensor at regular intervals (for example, 5 minutes). This prediction method may be, for example, the average of speed data up to the present or the moving unit uniformity.

ステップ22では、ステップ21で得られた予測速度■
2に基づいて前述の交通流異常判定用の上限閾値■2+
α及び下限閾値■2−αの設定を行う。
In step 22, the predicted speed obtained in step 21 is
2 based on the above-mentioned upper limit threshold for traffic flow abnormality determination ■2+
Set α and lower limit threshold ■2−α.

ここで設定された閾値■2±αを用いて第3図のフロー
チャートにおける交通流の異常の検出が行われるのであ
る。
The threshold value ■2±α set here is used to detect an abnormality in the traffic flow in the flowchart of FIG. 3.

以上のようにすれば、従来検出できなかった第6図にお
けるX点やY点における交通流の異常を検出することが
できる。そして、渋滞する以前であれば、渋滞発生の注
意報を出すことができる。
By doing the above, it is possible to detect abnormalities in traffic flow at points X and Y in FIG. 6, which could not be detected conventionally. Then, before a traffic jam occurs, a traffic jam warning can be issued.

また、隣接する車両感知器の互いのデータを比較するこ
とによって、異常交通流の発生湯所及び時間を自動的に
確認することができる。更には、渋滞発生中に異常交通
流を検出した場合に、過去のデータとの比較を行うこと
で、かかる異常交通流が通常のものか否かを区別するこ
とができ、自然渋滞か突発事象による渋滞かをドライバ
に知らせることができるようになる。
Furthermore, by comparing data from adjacent vehicle detectors, it is possible to automatically confirm the location and time when abnormal traffic flow occurs. Furthermore, when abnormal traffic flow is detected during a traffic jam, by comparing it with past data, it is possible to distinguish whether the abnormal traffic flow is normal or not. It will be possible to notify drivers if there is a traffic jam due to traffic jams.

尚、本実施例では、渋滞検出や異常交通流検出のための
交通状態量として速度■を用いたが、これに限らず密度
にや交通量Qを用いることが可能であり、また、これら
の組合わせにより渋滞及び異常交通流の検出を行うこと
も可能である。
In this example, the speed ■ is used as the traffic state quantity for detecting congestion and abnormal traffic flow, but the speed is not limited to this, and density and traffic volume Q can also be used. It is also possible to detect congestion and abnormal traffic flow by combining these methods.

〈発明の効果〉 以上説明したように本発明によれば、従来検出すること
ができなかった事故や工事等の突発事象に起因する異常
交通流を検出することができ、渋滞発生の注意報を出す
ことが可能となる。また、異常交通流の発生湯所及び時
間を即座に知ることができる。従って、交通情報の精度
を向上でき、ドライバに対して従来よりも詳細な交通情
報を提供することができ、道路交通の緩和に極めて有効
である。
<Effects of the Invention> As explained above, according to the present invention, it is possible to detect abnormal traffic flows caused by sudden events such as accidents and construction work that could not be detected conventionally, and to issue warnings of traffic congestion. It becomes possible to take it out. In addition, the location and time of occurrence of abnormal traffic flow can be immediately known. Therefore, the accuracy of traffic information can be improved, and more detailed traffic information than before can be provided to drivers, which is extremely effective in alleviating road traffic.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明の詳細な説明するブロック図、第2図は
本発明の一実施例を示す構成図、第3図は同上実施例の
渋滞及び異常交通流の検出フローチャート、第4図は同
上実施例の交通流異常検出用閾値の設定フローチャート
、第5図は隣接車両感知器による交通流異常判定結果の
比較例を示す図、第6図は同上実施例の交通流の検出動
作を説明する図、第7図は従来例の検出動作を説明する
図である。 ■・・・道路 2 3・・・車両感知器 4・・・コン トロールユニッ ト
Fig. 1 is a block diagram explaining the present invention in detail, Fig. 2 is a configuration diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention, Fig. 3 is a flowchart for detecting congestion and abnormal traffic flow of the same embodiment, and Fig. 4 is a block diagram showing a detailed explanation of the present invention. A flowchart for setting the threshold for traffic flow abnormality detection in the above embodiment, Fig. 5 is a diagram showing a comparative example of traffic flow abnormality determination results by adjacent vehicle detectors, and Fig. 6 explains the traffic flow detection operation in the above embodiment. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the detection operation of the conventional example. ■...Road 2 3...Vehicle detector 4...Control unit

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] (1)道路上の車両を検知する車両検知手段と、該車両
検知手段の出力に基づいて一定時間毎に交通状態量を検
出する交通状態量検出手段と、該交通状態量検出手段で
検出された交通状態量と予め設定された渋滞判別用閾値
とを比較して渋滞か否かを判定する渋滞判定手段と、前
記交通状態量検出手段で検出された現在までの交通状態
量データに基づいて現時点から所定時間後の交通状態量
を予測する交通状態量予測手段と、該交通状態量予測手
段の予測値に基づいて前記所定時間後の異常交通流判定
用上下閾値を設定する閾値設定手段と、前記所定時間後
において前記交通状態量検出手段で検出された実際の交
通状態量が前記閾値設定手段で設定された上下閾値間の
範囲外にあるとき交通流が異常であると判定する交通流
異常判定手段とを備えて構成したことを特徴とする異常
交通流の検出装置。
(1) A vehicle detection means for detecting a vehicle on the road; a traffic state amount detection means for detecting a traffic state amount at regular intervals based on the output of the vehicle detection means; traffic condition determining means for determining whether or not there is a traffic jam by comparing the traffic condition amount with a preset traffic condition determination threshold; and based on the traffic condition amount data up to the present detected by the traffic condition amount detection means a traffic state amount prediction means for predicting a traffic state amount after a predetermined time from the present time; and a threshold value setting means for setting upper and lower thresholds for abnormal traffic flow determination after the predetermined time based on the predicted value of the traffic state amount prediction means. , a traffic flow in which the traffic flow is determined to be abnormal when the actual traffic state quantity detected by the traffic state quantity detection means after the predetermined time is outside the range between the upper and lower threshold values set by the threshold value setting means; What is claimed is: 1. An abnormal traffic flow detection device comprising: abnormality determination means.
(2)道路上の車両を検知する車両検知手段と、該車両
検知手段の出力に基づいて一定時間毎に交通状態量を検
出する交通状態量検出手段と、該交通状態量検出手段で
検出された交通状態量と予め設定された渋滞判別用閾値
とを比較して渋滞か否かを判定する渋滞判定手段と、前
記交通状態量検出手段で検出された現在までの交通状態
量データに基づいて現時点から所定時間後の交通状態量
を予測する交通状態量予測手段と、該交通状態量予測手
段の予測値に基づいて前記所定時間後の異常交通流判定
用上下閾値を設定する閾値設定手段と、前記所定時間後
において前記交通状態量検出手段で検出された実際の交
通状態量が前記閾値設定手段で設定された上下閾値間の
範囲外にあるとき交通流が異常であると判定する交通流
異常判定手段とからなる組を、前記車両検知手段を道路
に沿って間隔を設けて設置して少なくとも2組設けると
共に、互いに隣接する組のそれぞれの交通流異常判定手
段の判定結果を比較する比較手段を備えて構成したこと
を特徴とする異常交通流の検出装置。
(2) a vehicle detection means for detecting a vehicle on the road; a traffic state amount detection means for detecting a traffic state amount at regular intervals based on the output of the vehicle detection means; traffic condition determining means for determining whether or not there is a traffic jam by comparing the traffic condition amount with a preset traffic condition determination threshold; and based on the traffic condition amount data up to the present detected by the traffic condition amount detection means a traffic state amount prediction means for predicting a traffic state amount after a predetermined time from the present time; and a threshold value setting means for setting upper and lower thresholds for abnormal traffic flow determination after the predetermined time based on the predicted value of the traffic state amount prediction means. , a traffic flow in which the traffic flow is determined to be abnormal when the actual traffic state quantity detected by the traffic state quantity detection means after the predetermined time is outside the range between the upper and lower threshold values set by the threshold value setting means; At least two sets of the vehicle detecting means are installed at intervals along the road, and the determination results of the respective traffic flow abnormality determining means of the adjacent sets are compared. What is claimed is: 1. An abnormal traffic flow detection device comprising: means.
JP253190A 1990-01-11 1990-01-11 Abnormal traffic flow detection device Expired - Lifetime JP2893544B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP253190A JP2893544B2 (en) 1990-01-11 1990-01-11 Abnormal traffic flow detection device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP253190A JP2893544B2 (en) 1990-01-11 1990-01-11 Abnormal traffic flow detection device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH03209599A true JPH03209599A (en) 1991-09-12
JP2893544B2 JP2893544B2 (en) 1999-05-24

Family

ID=11531966

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP253190A Expired - Lifetime JP2893544B2 (en) 1990-01-11 1990-01-11 Abnormal traffic flow detection device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2893544B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000242883A (en) * 1999-02-19 2000-09-08 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for processing vehicle sensor information
JP2007026301A (en) * 2005-07-20 2007-02-01 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Stopping/low-speed vehicle detector and stopping/low-speed vehicle detection method
EP2023308A1 (en) 2007-07-25 2009-02-11 Hitachi Ltd. Traffic incident detection system
CN103198711A (en) * 2013-03-21 2013-07-10 东南大学 Vehicle regulating and controlling method of lowering probability of traffic accidents of different severity
US8528455B2 (en) 2004-12-04 2013-09-10 Sms Siemag Ag Device for clamping a blade of shears, used in the transversal cutting of strips
CN103578274A (en) * 2013-11-15 2014-02-12 北京四通智能交通系统集成有限公司 Method and device for forecasting traffic flows
CN106920393A (en) * 2017-03-24 2017-07-04 银江股份有限公司 A kind of traffic behavior appraisal procedure based on threshold parameter configuration
CN115188186A (en) * 2022-06-28 2022-10-14 公安部交通管理科学研究所 Method for monitoring traffic flow in area

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116153074A (en) * 2018-10-05 2023-05-23 松下电器(美国)知识产权公司 Information processing method

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000242883A (en) * 1999-02-19 2000-09-08 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for processing vehicle sensor information
US8528455B2 (en) 2004-12-04 2013-09-10 Sms Siemag Ag Device for clamping a blade of shears, used in the transversal cutting of strips
JP2007026301A (en) * 2005-07-20 2007-02-01 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Stopping/low-speed vehicle detector and stopping/low-speed vehicle detection method
JP4600929B2 (en) * 2005-07-20 2010-12-22 パナソニック株式会社 Stop low-speed vehicle detection device
EP2023308A1 (en) 2007-07-25 2009-02-11 Hitachi Ltd. Traffic incident detection system
CN103198711A (en) * 2013-03-21 2013-07-10 东南大学 Vehicle regulating and controlling method of lowering probability of traffic accidents of different severity
CN103578274A (en) * 2013-11-15 2014-02-12 北京四通智能交通系统集成有限公司 Method and device for forecasting traffic flows
CN106920393A (en) * 2017-03-24 2017-07-04 银江股份有限公司 A kind of traffic behavior appraisal procedure based on threshold parameter configuration
CN106920393B (en) * 2017-03-24 2019-05-31 银江股份有限公司 A kind of traffic behavior appraisal procedure based on threshold parameter configuration
CN115188186A (en) * 2022-06-28 2022-10-14 公安部交通管理科学研究所 Method for monitoring traffic flow in area
CN115188186B (en) * 2022-06-28 2024-02-20 公安部交通管理科学研究所 Method for monitoring traffic flow in area

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2893544B2 (en) 1999-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5822712A (en) Prediction method of traffic parameters
Petty et al. Accurate estimation of travel times from single-loop detectors
CA2247372C (en) Road vehicle sensing apparatus and signal processing apparatus therefor
JPH0760478B2 (en) Traffic control system
EP0771447B1 (en) Detection and prediction of traffic disturbances
JPH03209599A (en) Detector for abnormal traffic flow
EP0470268B1 (en) Traffic flow change system
JP3305940B2 (en) Traffic condition prediction device
JP3876653B2 (en) Traffic flow anomaly detection apparatus and method
JP3249690B2 (en) Traffic congestion determination device
JP4126700B2 (en) Traveling time prediction device and traveling time prediction method
Hanbali et al. Methodology for evaluating effectiveness of traffic-responsive systems on intersection congestion and traffic safety
JPH076292A (en) Signal equipment control system
JPH09134493A (en) Device for collecting vehicle traveling information
JP3607330B2 (en) Congestion measurement method using sensor data
JP3734594B2 (en) Abnormal event detection device and traffic flow measurement device
JPH08106593A (en) Judging device for traffic flow state
Khoury et al. Performance comparison of automatic vehicle identification and inductive loop traffic detectors for incident detection
JPH0793678A (en) Detector for doze at wheel
JP2867552B2 (en) Traffic flow fluctuation monitoring device
JPH10134295A (en) Jam discrimination method for road traffic condition
JPH05290292A (en) Automatic sudden phenomenon detector
JP2003317184A (en) Individual vehicle monitoring device
Palmer et al. Comparing a bottleneck identification tool with the congested traffic pattern recognition system ASDA/FOTO using archived freeway data from Portland, Oregon
JPH08235485A (en) Vehicle sensor fault detector