JPH01255614A - Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof - Google Patents

Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof

Info

Publication number
JPH01255614A
JPH01255614A JP8477788A JP8477788A JPH01255614A JP H01255614 A JPH01255614 A JP H01255614A JP 8477788 A JP8477788 A JP 8477788A JP 8477788 A JP8477788 A JP 8477788A JP H01255614 A JPH01255614 A JP H01255614A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
melting
metal
component
melting process
computer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP8477788A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yasuo Murasawa
村沢 泰雄
Masahiko Inui
正彦 犬井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to JP8477788A priority Critical patent/JPH01255614A/en
Publication of JPH01255614A publication Critical patent/JPH01255614A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Carbon Steel Or Casting Steel Manufacturing (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To save man-hour and to decide suitable melting process by calculating the aimed value for each component of a metal, the aimed temp. for melting and charging wt. for material based on decision rule for melting process and the upper and lower limit values for quality and component standards of the metal. CONSTITUTION:Each data of component standard means (a) and production planning control means (b) stored in a computer 1 for production control and knowledge base (d) having melting process decision rule stored in a computer 2 for expert system are input into an inference engine (e). The inference engine (e) calculates process path, the aimed value for each component to be melted, the aimed temp. for melting and charging wt. for the material based on the rule for deciding the melting process and the upper and lower values for the quality and the component standards of the metal to be melted. These calculated data are inputted in a calculator 3 for process control through communicating means (f), (c) to give the steelmaking equipment 4 the operational command. By this method, the man-hour is saved and the melting plan can be set up under the newest rule, to execute excellent melting.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、知識工学を用いて行う金属の溶製プロセスの
決定方法及びその制御方法に関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to a method for determining a metal melting process using knowledge engineering and a method for controlling the same.

〔従来技術〕[Prior art]

従来、金属、例えば鋼の溶製プロセスの指示(以下溶製
方案という)は熟練した専門家(エキスパート)のみが
与え得るものであり、エキスパートの保有知識の整理の
困難さによってシステム化は未だ実現していない。また
不十分な知識によって構築されたシステムはシステム完
成後に次々と発生する諸条件の変更に対応できなくなっ
て実用に供し得ないものとなっていた。そこで近年プロ
ダクションシステムをベースとしたハイプリント型エキ
スパートシステムを用いた溶製方案の作成について検討
がなされている。
Traditionally, instructions for the melting process of metals, such as steel (hereinafter referred to as melting plans), could only be given by skilled experts (experts), and systemization has yet to be realized due to the difficulty of organizing the knowledge possessed by experts. I haven't. Furthermore, systems constructed with insufficient knowledge cannot be put to practical use because they cannot cope with changes in various conditions that occur one after another after the system is completed. Therefore, in recent years, consideration has been given to creating a melting method using a high-print type expert system based on a production system.

〔発明が解決しようとする課B] 上述した如〈従来はエキスパートが溶製方案を作成する
場合に工数がかかり、また操業諸元の変更111合金鉄
原単の変化がある場合に多数の鋼種に対して溶製方案を
変更することは不可能であるため不適正な溶製方案のま
まで操業を行うことになり、成分外れ9合金鉄原単位の
悪化、低熱による鋳込み作業の能率低下又は中断と鋳片
の品質の不良等の問題があった。
[Problem B to be solved by the invention] As mentioned above, in the past, it took a lot of man-hours for an expert to create a melting plan, and it also required a large number of steel types when there was a change in operating specifications. Since it is impossible to change the melting method, operations will be carried out with an inappropriate melting method, resulting in deterioration of the ferroalloy unit due to component deviations, decreased efficiency of casting work due to low heat, or There were problems such as interruptions and poor quality of slabs.

本発明は斯かる事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、その
目的とするところは、エキスパートシステムの知識ベー
スを用いることにより、溶製方案作成にかけていた工数
を削減し、常に最新諸元、最新ルールによる溶製方案の
作成を可能にして成分外れ、合金鉄原単位の悪化、低熱
による鋳込み作業の能率低下又は中断と鋳片の品質の不
良がない金属の溶製プロセスの決定方法及びその制御方
法を提案することにある。
The present invention was made in view of the above circumstances, and its purpose is to reduce the number of man-hours required to create a melting plan by using the knowledge base of an expert system, and to always keep up to date with the latest specifications and latest rules. A method for determining a metal melting process that enables the creation of a melting plan by eliminating composition deviations, deterioration of ferroalloy basic unit, efficiency reduction or interruption of casting work due to low heat, and defective quality of slabs, and its control method. The aim is to propose the following.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means to solve the problem]

本発明に係る金属の溶製プロセスの決定方法は所定の成
分規格を有する金属を溶製する場合のプロセスを決定す
る方法において、溶製プロセス決定のためのルールを知
識ベースとして予め用意しておき、前記ルールと前記金
属の材質及び成分規格の上、下限値とに基づいて、プロ
セスパス、溶製すべき金属の各成分の目標値、溶製の目
標温度及び材料投入量を算出させることを特徴とする。
The method for determining a metal melting process according to the present invention is a method for determining a process for melting a metal having a predetermined composition standard, in which rules for determining the melting process are prepared in advance as a knowledge base. , to calculate the process path, the target value of each component of the metal to be melted, the target temperature for melting, and the material input amount based on the rules and the upper and lower limit values of the material and component standards of the metal. Features.

また本発明の溶製プロセスの制御方法は上述の算出の結
果に基づいて溶製プロセスを制御するにある。
Further, the method for controlling the melting process of the present invention consists in controlling the melting process based on the results of the above-mentioned calculations.

〔作用〕[Effect]

知識ベースシステムは、これに入力された材質及び成分
規格の上下限値と、予め用意しである知識ベースとヲ用
いてその推論エンジンがプロセスパス等を算出する。
In the knowledge base system, its inference engine calculates process paths, etc. using the upper and lower limits of the material and component specifications inputted thereto and a knowledge base prepared in advance.

[実施例〕 以下、本発明方法を図面に基づき具体的に説明する。第
1図は本発明方法の実施に使用する装置の構成を示すブ
ロック図である。図に示す如くこの発明は生産管理用計
算機1.エキスパートシステム用計算機2及びプロセス
制御用計算機3の3つの計算機により実施される。
[Example] Hereinafter, the method of the present invention will be specifically explained based on the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an apparatus used to implement the method of the present invention. As shown in the figure, this invention is a production management computer 1. It is implemented by three computers: an expert system computer 2 and a process control computer 3.

生産管理用計算機1は、手続き型知識を用いる計算機で
あり、下記(a)〜(C)に示す3つの機能実現手段を
有している。
The production management computer 1 is a computer that uses procedural knowledge, and has three function implementation means shown in (a) to (C) below.

(a)、材質毎に成品成分の規格上下限を格納し管理す
る手段 (b)、製鋼工場における製造計画を格納し、管理する
手段 (C)、エキスパートシステム用計算機2及びプロセス
制御用計算機3と通信を行う手段 また、エキスパートシステム用計算機2は、下記(d)
〜(f)に示す3つの機能実現手段を有している。
(a) Means for storing and managing the upper and lower limits of specifications for product components for each material (b) Means for storing and managing manufacturing plans in a steelmaking factory (C) Expert system computer 2 and process control computer 3 In addition, the expert system computer 2 has the following (d)
It has three function realizing means shown in ~(f).

(d)、溶製プロセス決定のためのルールを格納しであ
る知識ベース (e)、この知識ベースに格納されているルール等を用
いて溶製プロセスを決定する推論エンジン (f)、生産管理用計算機1と通信を行う手段一方、プ
ロセス制御用計算機3は生産管理用計算機1からの情報
を受け、製鋼設備(転炉、RH,LT等の溶製設備及び
連鋳機等の鋳造設備)4の稼働を制御し、その稼働状態
は生産管理用計算機1ヘフイードバツクされる。
(d), a knowledge base (e) that stores rules for determining the melting process, an inference engine (f) that determines the melting process using the rules stored in this knowledge base, and production management. On the other hand, the process control computer 3 receives information from the production control computer 1, and processes steelmaking equipment (smelting equipment such as a converter, RH, LT, etc., and casting equipment such as a continuous caster). 4, and its operating status is fed back to the production control computer 1.

次に、本発明方法につき具体的に説明する。エキスパー
トシステム用計算機2が決定するのは次の4項目である
Next, the method of the present invention will be specifically explained. The expert system computer 2 determines the following four items.

(1)、プロセスパス (2)、目標成分 (3)、目標温度 (4)6合金鉄投入量及びその銘柄 以下、上記各項目別に述べる。(1), Process path (2), target component (3), target temperature (4) Amount of input of 6 ferroalloys and its brand Each of the above items will be explained below.

(1)、プロセスパス決定方法 例えば、転炉、 RH脱ガス装置、LT(取鍋精錬装置
)及び連鋳機等の製鋼設備4を保有する製fiE工場に
おいては第2図へ、B、Cに示す如き3種類のプロセス
パスが存在し得るため、生産管理用計算機1に格納され
ている製造計画管理手段(b)とエキスパートシステム
用計算機2に格納されている知識ベース(d)とのマツ
チングを行った後、推論エンジン(e)が推論を行い、
^、B、Cのうち最適のプロセスパスを決定し、その決
定情報を、エキスパートシステム用計算機2の通信手段
げ)によって生産管理用計算機1の通信手段(C)へ人
力し、該通信手段(C)によってプロセス制御用計算機
3へ入力し、該計算機3が製鋼設備4に稼働指令を与え
る。なお、プロセスパスA、B、Cで製造された連鋳綱
材は、夫々LT材、RH材、Ca処理材と呼ぶ。
(1) Process path determination method For example, in a fiE factory that has steelmaking equipment 4 such as a converter, RH degasser, LT (ladle refining equipment), and continuous caster, the method shown in Fig. 2, B, C. Since there may be three types of process paths as shown in Figure 1, matching of the manufacturing plan management means (b) stored in the production management computer 1 and the knowledge base (d) stored in the expert system computer 2 is necessary. After performing, the inference engine (e) performs inference,
^, B, and C, and manually transmits the determined information to the communication means (C) of the production management computer 1 through the communication means (C) of the expert system computer 2. C) is input to the process control computer 3, and the computer 3 gives an operation command to the steelmaking equipment 4. The continuously cast steel materials produced in process passes A, B, and C are respectively referred to as LT material, RH material, and Ca-treated material.

(2)、目標成分値の決定方法 目標成分の規格は溶製材の材質及び元素により上限値の
み定められたもの、下限値のみ定められたもの、上限値
及び下限値が定められたものの3種類があり、溶製の場
合の目標成分値は、成分値低下にコストを要する元素に
ついては上限値付近、成分値上昇にコストを要する元素
については下限値付近に設定する。コスト面だけから言
えば、上限値又は下限値の近傍の値を目標値として設定
すれば良いが、実際は投入合金鉄の品質のばらつき、歩
留まりのばらつき、制御性、成分外れの場合の振替鋼種
の有無、リカバリーの方法等の要因を考慮して目標値を
設定している。本発明方法ではこれら成分に関する情報
をルール化し、知識ベース(d)としてエキスパートシ
ステム用計算機2に格納する。
(2) Method for determining target component values There are three types of target component specifications: those with only the upper limit determined, those with only the lower limit determined, and those with both the upper and lower limits determined, depending on the material and element of the ingot material. In the case of melting, the target component values are set near the upper limit for elements that require cost to lower the component value, and near the lower limit for elements that require cost to increase the component value. From a cost perspective, it is sufficient to set a value close to the upper limit or lower limit as a target value, but in reality, it is necessary to set a value near the upper limit or lower limit as a target value, but in reality, it is necessary to change the steel type in case of variations in the quality of input ferroalloy, variations in yield, controllability, and composition deviations. Target values are set taking into consideration factors such as presence or absence and recovery method. In the method of the present invention, information regarding these components is made into rules and stored in the expert system computer 2 as a knowledge base (d).

前述した連鋳材のうちLT材について目標成分値の決定
方法を以下に述べる。LT材の成分目標値はLT処理後
の成分値として設定するため、エキスパートシステム用
計算機2の目標成分決定ルールに従って推論エンジン(
e)が、成分規格の上限値又は下限値よりLT処理後の
目標成分値を推論して決定し、次に転炉出鋼後目標成分
値、転炉終点目標成分値を推論して決定し、これらの決
定情報をエキスパートシステム用計算機2の通信手段(
f)により生産管理用計算機2の通信手段(C)へ入力
し、該通信手段(C)によってプロセス制御用計算n3
へ入力し、該計算機3が製鋼設備4に稼働指令を与える
A method for determining target component values for the LT material among the continuous casting materials described above will be described below. In order to set the component target value of the LT material as the component value after LT processing, the inference engine (
e) Infers and determines the target component value after LT treatment from the upper limit or lower limit value of the component specifications, and then infers and determines the target component value after converter tapping and the target component value at the end point of the converter. , these decision information are transmitted to the communication means of the expert system computer 2 (
f) to the communication means (C) of the production management computer 2, and the process control calculation n3 is inputted by the communication means (C).
The computer 3 gives an operation command to the steelmaking equipment 4.

なお、R11材、Ca処理材についてもLT材と同様の
考え方によって目標成分値の推論及び決定を行うことが
できる。
Note that the target component values can be inferred and determined for the R11 material and the Ca-treated material using the same concept as for the LT material.

(3)、目標温度の決定方法 LT材の目標温度決定方法について以下に述べる。(3) How to determine the target temperature The method for determining the target temperature of the LT material will be described below.

LT処理後の目標成分より凝固温度を決定し、これに基
づいて、タンデイツシュ内目標温度を計算し、各プロセ
スにおける処理方法9時間経過、温度降下に関するルー
ルによりLT処理後、 LT処理前、転炉出鋼後、及び
転炉終点の各目標温度を推論エンジン(e)が推論して
決定し、これらの決定情報を(1)。
The solidification temperature is determined from the target components after LT treatment, and based on this, the target temperature in the tandye is calculated, and the treatment method in each process is determined after 9 hours, according to the rules regarding temperature drop, after LT treatment, before LT treatment, and in the converter. The inference engine (e) infers and determines each target temperature after tapping and at the end point of the converter, and uses these determination information as (1).

(2)の場合と同様に通信手段げ)、 (C)を用いて
プロセス制御用計算機3へ入力し、該計算機3が製鋼設
備4に稼働指令を与える。但し、転炉終点目標温度は、
合金鉄投入による温度降下を考慮して、次項で述べる合
金鉄投入量の計算後に計算する。
As in the case of (2), the communication means (G) and (C) are used to input to the process control computer 3, and the computer 3 gives an operation command to the steelmaking equipment 4. However, the target temperature at the end point of the converter is
This is calculated after calculating the amount of ferroalloy input described in the next section, taking into account the temperature drop due to ferroalloy input.

なお、R11材、 Ca処理材についてもLT材と同様
の考え方によって目標温度の決定を行うことができる。
Note that the target temperature can also be determined for the R11 material and the Ca-treated material using the same concept as for the LT material.

(4)6合金鉄の銘柄及び投入量の決定転炉終点目標成
分値と転炉終点目標成分値(以下、溶解目標値という)
との差を取消内への合金鉄の投入によって埋めるべ(該
合金鉄の銘柄及び投入量を、エキスパートシステム用計
算機2が計算によって求める。
(4) Determining the brand and amount of ferroalloy 6
(The expert system computer 2 calculates the brand and amount of the ferroalloy to be filled.)

この計算には線形計画法が用いられ、推論エンジン(e
)によって状況に応じた最新の最適解が求められ、プロ
セス制御用計算機3が各制御設備4に制御指令を与える
。但し、ここで計算した合金鉄投入量は転炉終点目標成
分値が目標通り達成されると仮定した場合の値であり、
実際には操業時のばらつきによって上記(1)〜(3)
の溶製方案の決定結果に基づいてプロセス制御用計算機
3が再計算する。そしてこのようにして計算した結果に
基づいて溶製プロセスの制御を行う。
Linear programming is used for this calculation, and an inference engine (e
) is used to find the latest optimal solution according to the situation, and the process control computer 3 gives control commands to each control equipment 4. However, the amount of ferroalloy input calculated here is the value assuming that the target component value at the end point of the converter is achieved as targeted.
In reality, depending on the variations during operation, the above (1) to (3)
The process control computer 3 recalculates based on the determination result of the melting plan. Then, the melting process is controlled based on the results calculated in this way.

〔数値例] LT材の溶製プロセスを決定する方法について、具体的
な数値を用いて以下に説明する。
[Numerical Example] A method for determining the melting process for LT material will be described below using specific numerical values.

表1は本実施例に用いる溶鋼の成分のうち主な成分規格
の上下限値及び推論によって得られたLT処理後目標値
、溶解目標値、転炉終点目標値を示し、また表2はLT
処理後目標値を求めるための知識ベース(d)のルール
(IP−TIIEN〜)の−例を示す表である。
Table 1 shows the upper and lower limit values of the main component specifications among the components of the molten steel used in this example, and the target value after LT treatment, melting target value, and converter end point target value obtained by inference, and Table 2 shows the target value after LT treatment, melting target value, and converter end point target value obtained by inference.
It is a table showing an example of the rule (IP-TIIEN~) of the knowledge base (d) for determining the post-processing target value.

表1の成分規格上限値及び下限値と表2のルールとのマ
ツチングを行うことによりしT処理後の目標成分値を推
論エンジン(e)が推論して決定し、次に該目標成分値
と、予め定めた溶解目標値を求めるためのルールとのマ
ツチングを行うことにより溶解目標値を推論エンジン(
e)が推論し、また同様に転炉終点目標値を推論して決
定する。
The inference engine (e) infers and determines the target component value after T processing by matching the component standard upper and lower limit values in Table 1 with the rules in Table 2. , the dissolution target value is determined by the inference engine (
e) is inferred, and the converter end point target value is similarly inferred and determined.

但し、転炉終点目標値のC成分については、投入合金鉄
量の決定後に該合金鉄中のC量を考慮して再計算する必
要がある。
However, the C component of the converter end point target value needs to be recalculated by taking into account the C amount in the ferroalloy after determining the amount of ferroalloy to be input.

また、目標温度は製造計画管理手段(b)と知識ベース
(d)の目標温度決定ルールとのマツチングを行うこと
により推論エンジン(e)が推論して決定する。
Further, the target temperature is determined by inference by the inference engine (e) by matching the target temperature determination rules of the manufacturing plan management means (b) and the knowledge base (d).

表     1 表    2 上記表1に示したLT処理後目標値、溶解目標値及び転
炉終点目標値等の推論値は目標温度と共に生産管理用計
算機1によって日々の製造計画に従いプロセス制御用計
算機3に設定される。
Table 1 Table 2 The inferred values such as the post-LT treatment target value, melting target value, converter end point target value, etc. shown in Table 1 above are sent to the process control computer 3 along with the target temperature by the production control computer 1 according to the daily manufacturing plan. Set.

なお、本数値例ではLT材について述べたが、R11材
、Ca処理材についても同様に溶製方案の決定を行い得
る。
In this numerical example, the LT material has been described, but the melting method can be similarly determined for the R11 material and the Ca-treated material.

〔効果〕〔effect〕

以上に詳述した如く本発明方法においては、製造計画管
理手段及び成分規格管理手段を用いてデータベースと知
識ベースとの比較を行って適正な溶製方案を作成してい
くため、エキスパートがかけていた工数を削減すること
ができ、また常に最新諸元、最新ルールによる溶製方案
の作成が可能になるため、成分外れ、合金鉄原単位の悪
化、低熱による鋳込み作業の能率低下又は中断と鋳片の
品質の不良がなくなる等本発明は優れた効果を奏する。
As detailed above, in the method of the present invention, experts are required to create an appropriate melting plan by comparing the database and knowledge base using the manufacturing plan management means and component specification management means. In addition, it is possible to always create a melting plan based on the latest specifications and rules, which prevents component deviations, deterioration of the ferroalloy unit consumption, and decreased efficiency or interruption of casting work due to low heat. The present invention has excellent effects such as eliminating defects in the quality of pieces.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明方法の実施に用いる装置のブロック図、
第2図は本発明方法によるプロセスパスの種類を示す模
式図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus used to carry out the method of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the types of process passes according to the method of the present invention.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1、所定の成分規格を有する金属を溶製する場合のプロ
セスを決定する方法において、溶製プロセス決定のため
のルールを知識ベースとして予め用意しておき、前記ル
ールと前記金属の材質及び成分規格の上、下限値とに基
づいて、プロセスパス、溶製すべき金属の各成分の目標
値、溶製の目標温度及び材料投入量を算出させることを
特徴とする金属の溶製プロセスの決定方法。 2、所定の成分規格を有する金属を溶製する場合のプロ
セスを決定する方法において、溶製プロセス決定のため
のルールを知識ベースとして予め用意しておき、前記ル
ールと前記金属の材質及び成分規格の上、下限値とに基
づいて、プロセスパス、溶製すべき金属の各成分の目標
値、溶製の目標温度及び材料投入量を算出させ、この算
出結果に基づいて溶製プロセスの制御を行うことを特徴
とする金属の溶製プロセスの制御方法。
[Claims] 1. In a method for determining a process for melting a metal having a predetermined composition standard, rules for determining the melting process are prepared in advance as a knowledge base, and the rules and the A process path, a target value of each component of a metal to be melted, a target temperature for melting, and a material input amount are calculated based on the material of the metal and the upper and lower limit values of the component specifications. How to determine the melting process. 2. In a method for determining a process for ingotting a metal having a predetermined composition standard, rules for determining the ingot process are prepared in advance as a knowledge base, and the rules and the material and composition specifications of the metal are prepared in advance. Based on the upper and lower limit values, the process path, the target value of each component of the metal to be melted, the target temperature for melting, and the amount of material input are calculated, and the melting process is controlled based on the calculation results. 1. A method for controlling a metal melting process.
JP8477788A 1988-04-05 1988-04-05 Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof Pending JPH01255614A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP8477788A JPH01255614A (en) 1988-04-05 1988-04-05 Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP8477788A JPH01255614A (en) 1988-04-05 1988-04-05 Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01255614A true JPH01255614A (en) 1989-10-12

Family

ID=13840112

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP8477788A Pending JPH01255614A (en) 1988-04-05 1988-04-05 Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH01255614A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04109307A (en) * 1990-08-30 1992-04-10 Hitachi Metals Ltd Casting schedule formation system

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53109811A (en) * 1977-03-07 1978-09-26 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Oxygen steel-making process
JPS5856729A (en) * 1981-09-28 1983-04-04 Fanuc Ltd Working method of wire-cut electric discharge machine

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53109811A (en) * 1977-03-07 1978-09-26 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Oxygen steel-making process
JPS5856729A (en) * 1981-09-28 1983-04-04 Fanuc Ltd Working method of wire-cut electric discharge machine

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04109307A (en) * 1990-08-30 1992-04-10 Hitachi Metals Ltd Casting schedule formation system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
RU2492023C2 (en) Method and device for control over continuous cast billet solidification at continuous caster in starting casting process
CN104023875A (en) Casting method, more particularly continuous casting method
CN103984324B (en) Method for steel-making continuous casting dynamic dispatching based on heuristic algorithm cluster
JPH01255614A (en) Method for deciding melting process of metal and control method thereof
Dorčák et al. Monitoring and prediction of the liquid steel temperature in the ladle and tundish
JP5569413B2 (en) Production plan creation device and production plan creation method
JPH10211559A (en) Method for continuously casting different kinds of steels and continuous caster suitable to continuous casting of different kinds of steels
JP2006159274A (en) Cast-arranging device and cast-arranging method
Shukla et al. Lean operations strategy to combat uncertainties in temperture at bof end point, tapping, deoxidation, alloy addition and thermal history
JP3140799B2 (en) Control method of tapping temperature
JP7404394B2 (en) Method and associated computer program for monitoring steelmaking processes
JP7156023B2 (en) Continuous casting operation support device, continuous casting operation support method, and program
Kornet et al. Nonparametric Algorithm to Control the Temperature Regime of the Metal at BOF–CCM Section
JPH10249504A (en) Cutting method of continuously cast slab
JP2002333911A (en) Method for making production plan
JPH0732105A (en) Method for cutting cast slab in continuous casting
JP2000117400A (en) Method for adjusting components in metal
Sekhar et al. Four stage scheduling of steel making using earliest deadline first algorithm
Nandwana et al. Towards Digitalization of Steel Melt shop: A model-based approach
JPH0919749A (en) Method for controlling cut-off of cast slab in continuous casting
JP5827606B2 (en) Production schedule decision support system
JPH04124211A (en) Method for controlling blowing in oxygen steelmaking furnace
JPH06285603A (en) Device for predicting nozzle clogging in continuous casting process line
RU18859U1 (en) AUTOMATED CONVERTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
JP5428743B2 (en) Method and apparatus for knitting and determining cast for continuous casting