JP7165343B2 - Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove - Google Patents

Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7165343B2
JP7165343B2 JP2017142267A JP2017142267A JP7165343B2 JP 7165343 B2 JP7165343 B2 JP 7165343B2 JP 2017142267 A JP2017142267 A JP 2017142267A JP 2017142267 A JP2017142267 A JP 2017142267A JP 7165343 B2 JP7165343 B2 JP 7165343B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
groove
invasion
climbing
vines
test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2017142267A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019022451A (en
Inventor
勝 小笠原
静郎 佐々木
伸行 門倉
順也 村上
大樹 河村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Utsunomiya University
Kumagai Gumi Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Utsunomiya University
Kumagai Gumi Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Utsunomiya University, Kumagai Gumi Co Ltd filed Critical Utsunomiya University
Priority to JP2017142267A priority Critical patent/JP7165343B2/en
Publication of JP2019022451A publication Critical patent/JP2019022451A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7165343B2 publication Critical patent/JP7165343B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、蔓性植物の侵入を防止する方法と、前記蔓性植物の侵入を防止するために設けられる侵入防止溝とに関する。 The present invention relates to a method for preventing invasion of climbing plants and an invasion-preventing groove provided for preventing the invasion of said climbing plants.

蔓性植物のクズ(Pueraria Iobata Ohwi)は、線路、道路、造林地、公園、草地、河川敷など、あらゆる場所に育成し、非常に旺盛な成長力を有する多年草の植物で、放任すると、瞬く間に分布域を拡大させ、数年で優先種となる。その結果、有用樹木への巻き付き被覆による美観の低下や用地外への伸長により、近隣住民からの苦情の原因になる他、道路標識等に登攀・被覆することで交通安全施設の視認性を低下させるなど、様々な被害をもたらしている。
更に、生物多様性の保全を目的として施工するビオトープにおいては、ひとたびクズが繁茂すると、下草まで太陽の光が入らなくなるため、その成長が著しく阻害され、正常な植生遷移が行われなくなり、ビオトープの定義である多様な生物が棲む空間が失われる結果となる。すなわち、クズの蔓は、水平方向に伸長して生息域を拡大するため、下草に絡みつきその育成を抑制させるだけでなく、その大きな葉がもたらす遮光の影響により、草本種を枯死に到らす。特に、ホタルビオトープにおいては、ホタルの成虫は、背丈が比較的低い下草の裏面に産卵する特性があるため、クズの侵入により下草が減少すると、産卵場所の確保が困難となり、その結果、ホタルビオトープとしては致命的な被害を蒙ることになる。
Kudzu (Pueraria Iobata Ohwi) is a perennial plant that can be cultivated anywhere, such as railroad tracks, roads, plantations, parks, grasslands, riverbeds, etc., and has extremely vigorous growth. It expands its distribution area over time and becomes a priority species in a few years. As a result, it causes complaints from neighboring residents due to the deterioration of the aesthetic appearance due to the covering wrapped around useful trees and the extension outside the site, and the visibility of traffic safety facilities is reduced by climbing and covering road signs. causing various damages such as
Furthermore, in a biotope constructed with the aim of preserving biodiversity, once the kudzu grows thick, the sun's rays will not reach the undergrowth, which will significantly hinder its growth and prevent normal vegetation succession. As a result, the definition of a space inhabited by diverse organisms is lost. Kudzu vines extend horizontally to expand their habitat, so they not only entangle undergrowth and suppress their growth, but also cause herbaceous species to wither and die due to the effects of the shade brought by their large leaves. . Especially in the firefly biotope, firefly adults tend to lay their eggs on the underside of relatively low undergrowth. will suffer fatal injuries.

ところで、現在のクズ等の雑草の対策手法としては、以下のものが挙げられる。
(イ)抜根除草・草刈り
抜根除草は、人力で雑草を根元から抜き取る方法で、草刈りは、機械や鎌を用いて地上部を刈り取る方法である。前者の特徴は・美観に優れ、効果の持続性も高いが手間暇がかかることである。後者の特徴は、除草面積が大きい箇所では効率的であるが、根茎が残るため効果は一時的なものとなることである。いずれにしても、夏季の成長期には繁雑に実施する必要がある。
(ロ)除草剤散布除
薬剤により雑草の発芽や育成を阻害したり枯死させたりする方法で、特徴は、作業性、効果の持続に優れているが、人体への健康影響や、対象外の有用植物への影響に留意する必要があることである。一般的には、一度散布すると数カ月は効果が持続するとされている。しかし、できるだけ長く効果を維持させようとして標準量よりも多めに散布すると、逆に土壌に残留することになり、環境破壊の一因にもなりかねないおそれがある。
(ハ)砂利・砕石により被覆
人工的に加工された砕石や、自然の力で小さくなった砂利などを敷き詰める方法で、施工精度が高いと、3~5年は効果を発揮するとされている。しかし、砕石や砂利はその重みで徐々に沈むため、相対的に土が表面に出でくることになり、雑草がすぐ生える結果となる。また、砂利の上に落ち葉が落ちると掃き取りきれなくなり、手で1枚1枚除去するしか手段がないため、かなりやっかいになる。
(ニ)雑草防止シート(防草シート、複層シート)により被覆
防草シートは、物理的に表土を覆うことで雑草抑制を図る方法で、施工実績は多いが、緑地の機能を損なう上、基本的にシートの色が黒色であるため、人工的な景観となる。また、シートの継ぎ目から雑草が侵入するなど、雑草の抑制効果は施工精度に左右される。
複層シートは、表土を繊維質のシートで覆いながら雑草を防除するとともに、緑化植物を穴植えし、シート事態を緑化基盤として活用させる方法で、景観には優れるが、緑化植物が育成するまで一定の維持管理が必要となるので、コストは高価となる。その結果、適用箇所が限られるので、雑草抑制技術としては汎用性に欠ける。
防草シート及び被覆シートの耐用年数は5年程度とされている。
(ホ)固化材等により被覆
水と反応して固化する材料で、土に似た色合いであるため、景観上は自然な印象となる。また、雑草防止効果は上述の方法に比べて高い。敷厚さは約5cm以上が望ましく、またその下に水平性を維持するための基礎砂利敷き詰めが必須となるため、専門業者に依頼する必要がある。したがって、その分費用は高価となる。
By the way, current countermeasures against weeds such as kudzu include the following.
(b) Root weeding and mowing Root weeding is a method of manually pulling out weeds from the roots, and weeding is a method of cutting the above ground portion using a machine or sickle. The features of the former are: excellent appearance and long-lasting effect, but it takes time and effort. The latter feature is that although it is effective in areas with large weeding areas, the effect is temporary because rhizomes remain. In any case, it is necessary to carry out frequently during the summer growing season.
(b) Spraying herbicides This is a method of using chemicals to inhibit the germination and growth of weeds or kill them. It is necessary to pay attention to the influence on useful plants. Generally, once sprayed, the effect is said to last for several months. However, if a larger amount than the standard amount is sprayed in order to maintain the effect as long as possible, it will conversely remain in the soil and may contribute to environmental destruction.
(C) Covering with gravel and crushed stone Artificially processed crushed stone or gravel that has become smaller due to the force of nature is laid down. If the construction accuracy is high, it is said that the effect will be exhibited for 3 to 5 years. However, since the crushed stone and gravel gradually sink under their weight, the soil relatively rises to the surface, resulting in the rapid growth of weeds. In addition, when fallen leaves fall on the gravel, they cannot be swept away, and the only means is to remove them one by one by hand, which is quite troublesome.
(d) Covering with weed prevention sheets (grass prevention sheets, multi-layered sheets) Weed prevention sheets are a method of suppressing weeds by physically covering the topsoil. Since the color of the sheet is basically black, it becomes an artificial landscape. In addition, weeds can invade through the seams of the sheets, and the effect of suppressing weeds depends on the accuracy of construction.
A multi-layer sheet covers the topsoil with a fibrous sheet to control weeds, and at the same time, plants are planted in holes to use the sheet as a greening base. Costs are high due to the need for constant maintenance. As a result, it lacks versatility as a weed control technology because its application is limited.
The useful life of the weed control sheet and covering sheet is about 5 years.
(v) Covering with a solidifying material, etc. A material that solidifies when it reacts with water, and has a color similar to that of soil, giving a natural impression to the landscape. In addition, the weed control effect is higher than that of the above methods. It is desirable that the thickness of the bed should be about 5 cm or more, and since it is essential to lay the foundation gravel under it to maintain the horizontality, it is necessary to ask a specialist. Therefore, the cost becomes high accordingly.

ところで、生物多様性保全を要求されるフィールドに対しては、生態系の維持・保全、植生の自然遷移の観点から、上記(ロ)~(ホ)の手法を採用することは難しいと考えられる。
したがって、ビオトープに対する雑草対策手法としては、(イ)の手法を丁寧に地道に行ってゆく管理手法を用いざるを得ないのが現状である。
しかしながら、(イ)の手法では、夏季の成長期における抜根除草・草刈りを頻繁に実施する必要があるため、維持管理産業に要する経費削減が困難であるだけでなく、刈払機による傷害事故に対する作業者への安全確保が必要であった。
そこで、効果的・効率的・安全・安心な防草手法が求められている。
By the way, it is considered difficult to adopt the above methods (b) to (e) for fields that require biodiversity conservation from the viewpoint of ecosystem maintenance and conservation and natural succession of vegetation. .
Therefore, as a weed control method for a biotope, it is the current situation that there is no choice but to use the management method in which the method (a) is carefully and steadily performed.
However, with method (a), it is necessary to frequently remove weeds and weeds during the growing season in summer. It was necessary to ensure the safety of those involved.
Therefore, an effective, efficient, safe and secure weed control method is required.

本発明は、従来の問題点に鑑みてなされたもので、農薬等の化学薬品に頼らずに、蔓性植物の侵入を効果的に防ぐ方法と、蔓性植物の侵入を防止するために設けられる侵入防止溝を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the problems of the prior art. It is an object of the present invention to provide an anti-intrusion groove that is

本発明者は、鋭意検討の結果、蔓性植物は茎が細くかつ柔軟性を有するので、自重を支
えるがことが困難であることから、重力に逆らって水平方向へ伸長することができないの
で、蔓性植物の生息区域と予め指定された保護区域との間に一定幅以上の溝を設ければ、
蔓性植物の保護区域内への侵入を防止できることを見出し本発明に到ったものである。
すなわち、本発明は、蔓性植物の生息区域と、予め指定された保護区域(ビオトープな
どの、生物多様性保全を要求されるフィールド)との間に、前記蔓性植物の茎部分(以下、蔓という)の侵入を防止するための、幅寸法が50cm以上、200cm以下で、かつ、深さ寸法が50cm以上、150cm以下である侵入防止溝を設けることを特徴とする。
これにより、除草剤などの化学薬品に頼らずに蔓性植物の侵入を防ぐことができるので
、環境に負荷を与えることなく、保護区域を蔓性植物の被害から守ることができる。
また、本発明は、蔓性植物の生息区域と予め指定された保護区域との間に設けられて、
前記蔓性植物の蔓の侵入を防止するための侵入防止溝であって、前記侵入防止溝の幅寸法が50cm以上、200cm以下で、かつ、前記侵入防止溝の深さ寸法が50cm以上、150cm以下であることを特徴とする。
このような侵入防止溝を設けることにより、蔓が侵入防止溝を渡ることができないので、蔓性植物の保護区域内への侵入を確実に防止することができる。
また、前記侵入防止溝の延長方向を水平方向で、かつ、蔓性植物の蔓の伸長方向に垂直な方向することで、溝の長さを短くできるので、蔓性植物の侵入を効率よく防止することができる。
また、蔓性植物は水を嫌うので、前記侵入防止溝に水を貯留しておけば、蔓性植物の侵
入を効果的に防止することができる。なお、侵入防止溝内の水は必ずしも循環水である必
要はなく、溝底部に溜まった雨水であってもよい。
As a result of intensive studies, the present inventors have found that since lianas have thin and flexible stems, it is difficult for them to support their own weight, and therefore they cannot grow horizontally against gravity. If a ditch of a certain width or more is provided between the vine habitat and the pre-designated protected area,
The inventors have found that it is possible to prevent climbing plants from entering protected areas, and have arrived at the present invention.
That is, the present invention provides the stem portion of the climbing plant (hereinafter referred to as It is characterized by providing an invasion prevention groove having a width dimension of 50 cm or more and 200 cm or less and a depth dimension of 50 cm or more and 150 cm or less for preventing invasion of vines.
As a result, invasion of vines can be prevented without relying on chemicals such as herbicides, so that protected areas can be protected from damage by vines without imposing a burden on the environment.
In addition, the present invention is provided between a habitat area of climbing plants and a pre-designated protection area,
The entry-preventing groove for preventing invasion of the vines of the climbing plant, wherein the entry-preventing groove has a width dimension of 50 cm or more and 200 cm or less, and a depth dimension of the invasion prevention groove is 50 cm or more and 150 cm. It is characterized by the following.
By providing such invasion-preventing grooves, vines cannot cross the invasion-preventing grooves, so that it is possible to reliably prevent creeping plants from entering the protected area.
In addition, since the length of the groove can be shortened by setting the extension direction of the invasion prevention groove in the horizontal direction and in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the vine of the climbing plant, the invasion of the climbing plant can be efficiently prevented. can do.
In addition, since the creeping plants dislike water, if water is retained in the invasion-preventing grooves, the invasion of the climbing plants can be effectively prevented. It should be noted that the water in the intrusion prevention groove does not necessarily have to be circulating water, and may be rainwater collected at the bottom of the groove.

なお、前記発明の概要は、本発明の必要な全ての特徴を列挙したものではなく、これらの特徴群のサブコンビネーションもまた、発明となり得る。 It should be noted that the summary of the invention does not list all the necessary features of the present invention, and subcombinations of these feature groups can also be inventions.

本実施の形態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows this Embodiment. 侵入防止溝の溝幅を設定するための実験方法を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an experimental method for setting the groove width of an intrusion prevention groove; 侵入防止溝の溝幅とクズの伸長状態との関係を示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the relationship between the groove width of an intrusion prevention groove and the state of extension of debris. 実験結果を示す表である。It is a table|surface which shows an experimental result. クズの侵入状態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the invasion|invasion state of waste.

図1は本実施の形態を示す図で、同図において、1はビオトープなどの予め指定された保護区域、2は蔓性植物であるクズ3の生息区域、4は保護区域とクズの生息区域2との間に設けられた、断面がU字状のコンクリート製の溝である。なお、4aはクズ侵入防止溝4のクズ3の生息区域2側の側壁、4bは保護区域1側の側壁、4cは底面である。
本例では、クズ侵入防止溝4の幅寸法Wを、50cm≦W≦200cmの範囲とした。
幅寸法Wの下限値を50cmとしたのは、クズ3は茎(以下、蔓3Lという)が細くて柔らかいので、蔓3Lの太さにもよるが、伸長長さが20cm~30cmになると自重を支えるがことが困難になり、水平方向へ伸長することができなくなるからである。また、幅寸法Wの上限値を200cmとしたのは、溝幅をこれ以上大きくしても、クズ3の侵入防止効果が変わらないからである。
このとき、侵入防止溝4の延長方向を蔓性植物の伸長方向と垂直な方向とすることが好ましい。これにより、侵入防止溝4の長さを短くできるので、蔓性植物の侵入を効率よく防止することができる。
なお、クズ侵入防止溝4が浅すぎると、溝幅Wが広くても、侵入防止溝4内に侵入した蔓3Lが、保護区域側の側壁4bを登って保護区域1内に侵入する場合がある。本例では、クズ侵入防止溝4の深さ寸法Dを50cm以上とすることで、蔓3Lが侵入防止溝4内に侵入しても、保護区域1内には侵入しないようにしている。なお、溝深さは100cmあれば十分であり、100cmより深くしてもクズ3の侵入防止効果が変わらない。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing this embodiment, in which 1 is a pre-designated protected area such as a biotope, 2 is a habitat for kudzu 3, which is a climbing plant, and 4 is a protected area and a habitat for kudzu. 2 is a concrete groove with a U-shaped cross section. 4a is the side wall of the dwarf invasion preventing groove 4 on the side of the habitat 2 of the dwarf 3, 4b is the side wall on the protected area 1 side, and 4c is the bottom.
In this example, the width dimension W of the dust entry prevention groove 4 is in the range of 50 cm≦W≦200 cm.
The reason why the lower limit of the width dimension W is set to 50 cm is that the stem of the kudzu 3 (hereinafter referred to as the vine 3L) is thin and soft. This is because it becomes difficult to support the body and cannot be stretched horizontally. The reason why the upper limit of the width W is set to 200 cm is that even if the width of the groove is increased further, the effect of preventing the dust 3 from entering does not change.
At this time, it is preferable that the extending direction of the invasion-preventing groove 4 is perpendicular to the extending direction of the climbing plant. As a result, the length of the intrusion prevention groove 4 can be shortened, so that the intrusion of climbing plants can be efficiently prevented.
If the debris entry prevention groove 4 is too shallow, the tendrils 3L that have entered the entry prevention groove 4 may climb the side wall 4b on the protected area side and enter the protected area 1 even if the groove width W is wide. be. In this example, by setting the depth D of the debris entry prevention groove 4 to 50 cm or more, even if the tendrils 3L enter the entry prevention groove 4, they are prevented from entering the protected area 1.例文帳に追加A groove depth of 100 cm is sufficient, and even if the groove is deeper than 100 cm, the effect of preventing the debris 3 from entering does not change.

図2(a),(b)は、侵入防止溝の溝幅を設定するための実験方法を示す図である。実験は、クズを育成するための試験区5に試験溝6を設けるとともに、試験溝6の幅方向の一方の側(以下、クズ生息側5aという)にクズ7の幼苗を植え、自然条件下でクズ7の生育し、成長したクズ7が試験溝6の幅方向の他方の側(以下、保護域側5bという)に侵入するか否かを観察した。
クズ7の幼苗は、水稲用培土、腐葉土、芝の目土、赤土を混合充填した内径9.5cm、深さ8.5cmのポットにクズ種子を播種し、自然光下のガラス温室内で、適宜灌水しながら、三出複葉が8枚になるまで育成したものの中から、株元から蔓の先端までの長さが10cm前後のものを用いた。
試験溝6は、厚さ12mmのベニヤ板を用いて作製された、長さがL=180cm、深さがD=75cm、幅がWの直方体状の溝で、本実験では、試験溝の溝幅Wを、25cm,50cm,75cm,100cmの4種類とするとともに、試験区5を4箇所とし、試験区5ごとに異なる幅Wの試験溝6を作製した。
クズ7の幼苗は、試験溝6のクズ生息側5a側の側壁6aの位置からa=45cm離れた地点に、真ん中の幼苗が試験溝6の長さ方向の中心線の延長上にくるように、b=30cmずつ隔して計3株地植えした。
2(a) and 2(b) are diagrams showing an experimental method for setting the groove width of the intrusion prevention groove. In the experiment, a test groove 6 was provided in a test section 5 for growing kudzu, and seedlings of kudzu 7 were planted on one side of the test groove 6 in the width direction (hereinafter referred to as the kudzu inhabited side 5a). It was observed whether or not the grown scraps 7 invaded the other side of the test groove 6 in the width direction (hereinafter referred to as the protective area side 5b).
Seedlings of Kudzu 7 are sown in a pot with an inner diameter of 9.5 cm and a depth of 8.5 cm filled with a mixture of paddy rice culture soil, leaf soil, turf grout, and red soil, and placed in a glass greenhouse under natural light. Among the plants grown with watering until they had 8 trifoliate compound leaves, plants with a length of about 10 cm from the base of the vine to the tip of the vine were used.
The test groove 6 is a rectangular parallelepiped groove having a length of L = 180 cm, a depth of D = 75 cm, and a width of W made using a plywood board having a thickness of 12 mm. W was set to four types of 25 cm, 50 cm, 75 cm, and 100 cm, and four test sections 5 were provided, and test grooves 6 having different widths W were prepared for each test section 5 .
Seedlings of kudzu 7 are placed at a point a = 45 cm away from the position of the side wall 6a on the side 5a of the kudzu inhabitation side of the test groove 6, so that the seedling in the middle is on the extension of the center line in the longitudinal direction of the test groove 6. , b = 30 cm apart, and a total of 3 strains were planted in the ground.

図3(a)~(d)は、溝幅Wがそれぞれ、25cm,50cm,75cm,100cmの試験溝におけるクズの伸長状況を示す図で、左側が実験開始直後の図、右側が40日経過後の図である。
図3に示すように、幅W=25cmの試験区では多数の蔓が試験溝6を乗り越えた。
一方、その他の試験区では、試験溝6を乗り越えた蔓は全く認められなかった。
実験結果の詳細を図4の表に示す。
表の「供試数」は、試験溝6内に侵入した蔓のうち、長さが、溝幅Wに株元から溝までの距離(45cm)を加えた長さに達した蔓(以下、供試蔓という)の本数である。
また、「溝を乗り越した蔓の数」は、図5(a)に示すように、蔓7Lが試験溝6を乗り越えて保護区域5b側に達した供試蔓の数で、「A状態の蔓の数」は、図5(b)に示すように、試験溝6の底面6cに達したものの、試験溝6を乗り越えられなかった供試蔓の数である。また、「B状態の蔓の数」は、図5(c)に示すように、試験溝6の保護区域5b側の側壁6bに達したものの、試験溝6を乗り越えられなかった供試蔓の数である。なお、同表に示すように、蔓の平均長さと平均太さは、各試験区でほぼ同じである。
図4の表に示すように、溝幅Wが25cmの試験区では、17本の供試蔓のうち、8本が試験溝6を乗り越えた。これに対して、幅Wが、50cm,75cm,100cmの試験区では、試験溝6を乗り越えた供試蔓は1本もなかった。
これにより、クズの蔓は、溝幅が50cm以上の溝を乗り越えることができないことが確認された。
なお、溝幅Wが広くなると、保護区域5b側の側壁6bに達するものは減少し、試験溝6の底面6c供試蔓が試験溝6の底面6cで止まる場合の方が増加していることも分かった。
3 (a) to (d) are diagrams showing the elongation of crumbs in test grooves with groove widths W of 25 cm, 50 cm, 75 cm, and 100 cm, respectively. is a diagram.
As shown in FIG. 3, a large number of tendrils climbed over the test groove 6 in the test section with a width W of 25 cm.
On the other hand, in the other test plots, no vines that climbed over the test groove 6 were observed.
Details of the experimental results are shown in the table of FIG.
The "number of samples" in the table refers to the number of vines that have entered the test groove 6 and whose length has reached the groove width W plus the distance from the base of the plant to the groove (45 cm) (hereinafter referred to as vines).
Further, "the number of vines that climbed over the groove" is the number of test vines that climbed over the test groove 6 and reached the protected area 5b side, as shown in Fig. 5(a). The number of vines” is the number of test vines that reached the bottom surface 6c of the test groove 6 but could not climb over the test groove 6, as shown in FIG. 5(b). Also, as shown in FIG. 5(c), the "number of vines in state B" indicates the number of test vines that reached the side wall 6b on the protected area 5b side of the test groove 6 but could not climb over the test groove 6. is a number. In addition, as shown in the same table, the average length and average thickness of the vines are almost the same in each test plot.
As shown in the table of FIG. 4, eight of the 17 test vines climbed over the test groove 6 in the test section where the groove width W was 25 cm. On the other hand, in the test plots with widths W of 50 cm, 75 cm, and 100 cm, none of the test vines climbed over the test groove 6 .
As a result, it was confirmed that the kudzu vines could not climb over grooves with a groove width of 50 cm or more.
It should be noted that when the groove width W increases, the number of vines reaching the side wall 6b on the side of the protected area 5b decreases, and the number of test vines that stop at the bottom surface 6c of the test groove 6 increases. I also found out.

以上、本発明を実施の形態を用いて説明したが、本発明の技術的範囲は前記実施の形態に記載の範囲には限定されない。前記実施の形態に、多様な変更または改良を加えることが可能であることが当業者にも明らかである。そのような変更または改良を加えた形態も発明の技術的範囲に含まれ得ることが、特許請求の範囲から明らかである。 Although the present invention has been described above using the embodiments, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the scope described in the above embodiments. It is also obvious to those skilled in the art that various modifications and improvements can be made to the above embodiments. It is clear from the scope of the claims that forms with such modifications or improvements can also be included in the technical scope of the invention.

例えば、前記実施の形態では、蔓性植物をクズとしたが、本発明の侵入防止溝4は、他の蔓性植物の侵入防止にも有効である。
また、蔓性植物は水を嫌うので、侵入防止溝4に水を貯留しておけば、蔓性植物の侵入防止効果を更に高めることができる。なお、水としては、雨水などであってもよい。侵入防止溝4に水を貯留する場合には、水が侵入防止溝4から溢れ出ることがないように、侵入防止溝4内に下水等に連通する排水孔を設けることが好ましい。
また、前記実施の形態では、侵入防止溝4をコンクリート製の溝としたが、クズ侵入防止溝4をベニヤ板や合成樹脂板などの板材から構成してもよい。コンクリート製の溝は耐久性には優れているが、クズの生息分布が変化した場合など、クズ侵入防止溝4を作り直すときには、板材の方が有利である。
For example, in the above-described embodiment, vines are used as kudzu.
In addition, since the creeping plants dislike water, if water is stored in the invasion prevention groove 4, the effect of preventing the invasion of the climbing plants can be further enhanced. The water may be rainwater or the like. When water is stored in the entry-preventing groove 4, it is preferable to provide a drainage hole communicating with sewage or the like in the entry-preventing groove 4 so that the water does not overflow from the entry-preventing groove 4.
In addition, in the above-described embodiment, the entry prevention groove 4 is made of concrete. Concrete grooves are excellent in durability, but plate material is more advantageous when recreating the waste entry prevention grooves 4, such as when the waste distribution has changed.

1 保護区域、2 クズの生息区域、3 クズ(蔓性植物)、4 侵入防止溝、
4a,4b 側壁、4c 底面。
1 protected area, 2 kudzu habitat, 3 kudzu (vines), 4 anti-intrusion ditches,
4a, 4b sidewalls, 4c bottom.

Claims (4)

蔓性植物の生息区域と予め指定された保護区域との間に、
前記蔓性植物の蔓の侵入を防止するための、幅寸法が50cm以上、200cm以下で、
かつ、深さ寸法が50cm以上、150cm以下である侵入防止溝を設けることを特徴とする蔓性植物の侵入防止方法。
Between the habitat of the climbing plants and the pre-designated protected area,
A width dimension of 50 cm or more and 200 cm or less for preventing invasion of the vines of the climbing plant,
A method for preventing invasion of climbing plants, characterized by providing an invasion-preventing groove having a depth of 50 cm or more and 150 cm or less.
性植物の生息区域と予め指定された保護区域との間に設けられて、前記蔓性植物の蔓の侵入を防止するための溝であって、
前記侵入防止溝の幅寸法が50cm以上、200cm以下で、
かつ、前記侵入防止溝の深さ寸法が50cm以上、150cm以下であることを特徴とする蔓性植物の侵入防止溝。
A groove provided between a climbing plant habitat area and a pre-designated protected area for preventing invasion of the climbing plant vines ,
The width dimension of the intrusion prevention groove is 50 cm or more and 200 cm or less,
In addition, the penetration prevention groove for climbing plants is characterized in that the penetration prevention groove has a depth dimension of 50 cm or more and 150 cm or less.
前記侵入防止溝の延長方向が水平方向であり、かつ、前記蔓性植物の蔓の伸長方向に垂直な方向であることを特徴とする請求項2に記載の蔓性植物の侵入防止溝。 3. The groove for preventing invasion of climbing plants according to claim 2, wherein the extending direction of the groove for preventing invasion is horizontal and perpendicular to the extending direction of the tendrils of the climbing plant. 前記侵入防止溝には水が貯留されていることを特徴とする請求項2または請求項3に記載の蔓性植物の侵入防止溝。 4. The groove for preventing invasion of climbing plants according to claim 2 or 3, wherein water is stored in the groove for preventing invasion.
JP2017142267A 2017-07-21 2017-07-21 Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove Active JP7165343B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017142267A JP7165343B2 (en) 2017-07-21 2017-07-21 Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017142267A JP7165343B2 (en) 2017-07-21 2017-07-21 Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019022451A JP2019022451A (en) 2019-02-14
JP7165343B2 true JP7165343B2 (en) 2022-11-04

Family

ID=65368066

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017142267A Active JP7165343B2 (en) 2017-07-21 2017-07-21 Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7165343B2 (en)

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005102520A (en) 2003-09-29 2005-04-21 Osamu Yoshida Tool preventing elongation of vine
JP2005218359A (en) 2004-02-05 2005-08-18 Japan Highway Public Corp Method for exterminating liana
JP2006296323A (en) 2005-04-22 2006-11-02 Zenitaka Corp Device for preventing invasion of crawling insects
JP2007159485A (en) 2005-12-14 2007-06-28 Ikari Shodoku Kk Tool for preventing invasion of insect pest and structure for preventing invasion of insect pest having the same
JP2007252241A (en) 2006-03-22 2007-10-04 Kankyo Hozen Consul:Kk Method for killing rhizome
WO2012048377A1 (en) 2010-10-13 2012-04-19 The University Of Queensland Control of weeds
JP2012102494A (en) 2010-11-09 2012-05-31 Hidemitsu Kakudo Weed-proof fence
JP2013234487A (en) 2012-05-09 2013-11-21 Hidemitsu Kakudo Weed-proof fence for ivy
JP2013240282A (en) 2012-05-18 2013-12-05 West Nippon Expressway Co Ltd Structure and method for preventing entering of animal
JP2014225977A (en) 2013-05-16 2014-12-04 中国電力株式会社 Guidance system of climbing plant
JP2017063780A (en) 2015-10-01 2017-04-06 角銅 秀光 Ivy return member and weed control ivy return unit

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0591283U (en) * 1992-05-22 1993-12-14 株式会社ミヤデン Fence for preventing overgrowth of lawns

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005102520A (en) 2003-09-29 2005-04-21 Osamu Yoshida Tool preventing elongation of vine
JP2005218359A (en) 2004-02-05 2005-08-18 Japan Highway Public Corp Method for exterminating liana
JP2006296323A (en) 2005-04-22 2006-11-02 Zenitaka Corp Device for preventing invasion of crawling insects
JP2007159485A (en) 2005-12-14 2007-06-28 Ikari Shodoku Kk Tool for preventing invasion of insect pest and structure for preventing invasion of insect pest having the same
JP2007252241A (en) 2006-03-22 2007-10-04 Kankyo Hozen Consul:Kk Method for killing rhizome
WO2012048377A1 (en) 2010-10-13 2012-04-19 The University Of Queensland Control of weeds
JP2012102494A (en) 2010-11-09 2012-05-31 Hidemitsu Kakudo Weed-proof fence
JP2013234487A (en) 2012-05-09 2013-11-21 Hidemitsu Kakudo Weed-proof fence for ivy
JP2013240282A (en) 2012-05-18 2013-12-05 West Nippon Expressway Co Ltd Structure and method for preventing entering of animal
JP2014225977A (en) 2013-05-16 2014-12-04 中国電力株式会社 Guidance system of climbing plant
JP2017063780A (en) 2015-10-01 2017-04-06 角銅 秀光 Ivy return member and weed control ivy return unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019022451A (en) 2019-02-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106900195B (en) One kind taking native field ecological restoring method
JP5083507B2 (en) Lotus root cultivation method and cultivation apparatus using shallow bed cultivation tank
JP7165343B2 (en) Climbing plant invasion prevention method and vine invasion prevention groove
US9629341B2 (en) Method for inhibiting shore erosion
JP6205547B2 (en) Grass como greening sheet and construction method
EP2347646A1 (en) Growth protector for plant
JP5408463B2 (en) Planting mat
JP2756095B2 (en) Plant growth inhibiting mat and greening method using the mat
Hill et al. Vetiver grass for erosion control, Hong Kong and Guizhou, China
JP2005054477A (en) Buried solidified layer seeding and planting method
DeMoranville et al. Planting new cranberry beds
JPH08199529A (en) Soil-covering block for river and concrete soil-covering block revetment
Lieberman et al. Vegetation use in coastal ecosystems
Singh et al. Treatment technologies for watershed development and management in north east hill region
JP3116273U (en) TK thin planting mat body
Rickards Landscaping to Protect Your Coastal Property from Storm Damage and Flooding
JP2017127245A (en) Weed preventing and greening sheet, and weed preventing and greening method using the same
Bernhardt et al. Long-term performance of minimum-input oak restoration plantings
KR101703675B1 (en) Method for cultivating crop without chemical
TWI601870B (en) Embankment greening methods and dike
JP2006045846A (en) Grating crib with bite damage preventive net
KR20170127821A (en) Mat for preventing Weeds
Holiman Evaluation and Recommendations for a Portion of the East Brook
KR20120079950A (en) Mulching sheet for covering on flower bed
Taylor A practical guide to ecological management of the golf course

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200707

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20200707

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20210611

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20210706

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20210831

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220208

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220315

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220802

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220907

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20221011

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20221014

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7165343

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150