JP7101056B2 - Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink - Google Patents

Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7101056B2
JP7101056B2 JP2018114565A JP2018114565A JP7101056B2 JP 7101056 B2 JP7101056 B2 JP 7101056B2 JP 2018114565 A JP2018114565 A JP 2018114565A JP 2018114565 A JP2018114565 A JP 2018114565A JP 7101056 B2 JP7101056 B2 JP 7101056B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
swallowing
correlation
test
evaluation
foods
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018114565A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019219185A (en
Inventor
喬 合田
和寛 前田
誠 中馬
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
San Ei Gen FFI Inc
Original Assignee
San Ei Gen FFI Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by San Ei Gen FFI Inc filed Critical San Ei Gen FFI Inc
Priority to JP2018114565A priority Critical patent/JP7101056B2/en
Publication of JP2019219185A publication Critical patent/JP2019219185A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7101056B2 publication Critical patent/JP7101056B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Jellies, Jams, And Syrups (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)

Description

本発明は、物理的な試験の結果と官能評価との相関性に基づいて飲食品の嚥下特性を評価する、飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks, which evaluates the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks based on the correlation between the results of physical tests and the sensory evaluation.

食品開発における食感は、商品の嗜好性を左右する重要な要素であり、介護食における嚥下のしやすさとも密接に関係している。そして、高齢化社会の進行により、飲み込んだ際に誤って気管に入ってしまう(=誤嚥)リスクを低減する目的で、液体にとろみを付与することで、のどを通過する速度をゆるやかにした、とろみ調整食品などの介護食の開発が急務となっている。 Texture in food development is an important factor that influences the taste of products, and is closely related to the ease of swallowing in long-term care foods. With the progress of the aging society, the liquid is thickened to slow down the speed of passing through the throat in order to reduce the risk of accidentally entering the trachea (= aspiration) when swallowed. There is an urgent need to develop nursing care foods such as thickened foods.

液体にとろみを付与する方法としては、水やお茶などに食品用の増粘剤を添加したり、増粘剤溶液を食品に添加する方法がある。このような増粘成分は、「とろみ」だけでなく、それ以外の食感を与えることが知られており、例えば、「なめらかさ」、「まとまりやすさ」、「べたつき」、「飲み込みやすさ」などの食感に影響する。これらは、介護食の嚥下性を左右する要因となる。 As a method of imparting thickening to a liquid, there are a method of adding a thickener for food to water, tea, etc., and a method of adding a thickener solution to food. It is known that such a thickening component gives not only "thickness" but also other textures, for example, "smoothness", "easy to organize", "stickiness", and "easy to swallow". It affects the texture such as. These are factors that affect the swallowability of long-term care foods.

このような飲食品用の増粘剤の食感を物理的な試験で評価する方法としては、レオロジー試験により、飲食品の粘弾性を測定する方法が知られていた。しかし、本発明者らの研究によると、レオロジー試験のみでは、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」などは、十分に評価できないことが判明した。 As a method for evaluating the texture of such a thickener for food and drink by a physical test, a method for measuring viscoelasticity of food and drink by a rheology test has been known. However, according to the research by the present inventors, it has been found that "ease of swallowing" and "ease of cohesion" cannot be sufficiently evaluated only by the rheology test.

一方、増粘剤に限らず、広く食品の官能口当たり特性を予測する方法として、トライボロジー試験の結果を用いる方法も提案されている。 On the other hand, a method using the results of a tribology test has been proposed as a method for predicting the sensory mouthfeel characteristics of foods, not limited to thickeners.

例えば、特許文献1には、トライボロジー装置を使用して、摺動速度の関数として、食品の摩擦因子を測定することによってトライボロジーデータセットを得るステップと、予め求めた相関モデルに基づいて前記食品の1つ以上の官能口当たり特性を求めるステップとを含む方法が開示されている。その際、前記相関モデルは、官能分析によって基準食品の1つ以上の官能口当たり特性を画定するステップと、そのステップで画定された前記1つ以上の官能口当たり特性に関する、前記基準食品の官能採点を行うことによって、官能データセットを収集するステップと、トライボロジー装置を使用して、摺動速度の関数として、前記基準食品の摩擦因子を測定することによって、トライボロジーデータセットを収集するステップと、前記1つ以上の官能口当たり特性を予測するために、前記トライボロジーのデータセットと前記官能データセットとの間の相関モデルを構築するステップとによって求められている。 For example, Patent Document 1 describes a step of obtaining a tribology data set by measuring a friction factor of a food as a function of a sliding speed using a tribology device, and a correlation model obtained in advance for the food. Disclosed are methods that include one or more steps to determine the functional mouthfeel. At that time, the correlation model determines a step of defining one or more functional mouthfeel characteristics of the reference food by sensory analysis and a sensory scoring of the reference food with respect to the one or more functional mouthfeel characteristics defined in the step. A step of collecting a tribology data set by performing, and a step of collecting a tribology data set by measuring the friction factor of the reference food as a function of sliding speed using a tribology device, and the above 1 In order to predict one or more functional mouthfeel properties, it is sought by the steps of constructing a correlation model between the tribological dataset and the functional dataset.

特許第5548612号公報Japanese Patent No. 5548612

しかしながら、特許文献1の評価方法では、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」などの嚥下特性の評価が行なわれておらず、このような評価がトライボロジー試験の結果から評価できるか否かは不明であった。また、この評価方法では、多数の成分を含む飲食品を対象としているため、摺動速度の関数として食品の摩擦因子を測定したトライボロジーデータセットを用いて主成分分析による相関モデルを構築する必要がある。このため、より簡易な方法で、飲食品の嚥下特性の評価が可能か否かについても不明であった。 However, in the evaluation method of Patent Document 1, the swallowing characteristics such as "ease of swallowing" and "ease of cohesion" have not been evaluated, and whether such evaluation can be evaluated from the results of the tribology test. Was unknown. In addition, since this evaluation method targets foods and drinks containing a large number of components, it is necessary to construct a correlation model by principal component analysis using a tribology data set that measures the friction factor of food as a function of sliding speed. be. Therefore, it was unclear whether the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks could be evaluated by a simpler method.

そこで、本発明は、トライボロジー試験で得られる摩擦特性を使用した簡易な方法で、飲食品の嚥下特性を精度良く評価することができる飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks, which can accurately evaluate the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks by a simple method using the frictional characteristics obtained in a tribology test. ..

本発明者らは、トライボロジー試験の条件を好適化することで、得られる摩擦特性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなることを見出し、かかる知見に基づいて、本発明を完成するに至った。 The present inventors have found that by optimizing the conditions of the tribology test, the correlation between the obtained frictional characteristics and the swallowing characteristics is enhanced, and based on such findings, the present invention has been completed.

本発明は以下の態様を含む;
項1.
予め求めたトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性と官能評価との相関性に基づいて、飲食品のトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性から嚥下特性を評価する飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
項2.
前記嚥下特性の評価は、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」からなる評価項目の1つ以上の評価である、項1に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
項3.
前記相関性は、同じ粘度特性を有するように、複数の増粘成分を各々含む複数の液体試料を調製し、得られた複数の液体試料についてトライボロジー試験と官能評価を行なって求めたものである、項1又は2に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
項4.
前記相関性は、前記トライボロジー試験を複数の条件で行ない、摩擦係数と官能評価の相関性の高い条件を選択して決定されたものであり、
前記相関性に基づく嚥下特性の評価は、前記条件と同じ条件で行なわれたトライボロジー試験で測定した摩擦係数を用いて行なわれる、項1~3いずれか1項に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
項5.
前記評価項目が2つ以上選択されると共に、選択された評価項目を評価する際の前記トライボロジー試験の条件が各々異なる条件である、項2~4のいずれか1項に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
項6.
前記トライボロジー試験におけるすべり速度が、各評価項目に対して、下記の通りである、項2~5のいずれか1項に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
「なめらかさ」の場合、すべり速度が9.0×10-8~7.0×10-7m/s、又は0.05~0.6m/s
「飲み込みやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00006~0.035m/s、
「まとまりやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00014~0.0002m/s、又は0.015~0.8m/s。
項7.
前記トライボロジー試験におけるノーマルフォース(荷重)が0.1~1Nである、項1~6のいずれか1項に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
項8.
さらに、予め求めたレオロジー試験の結果と官能評価との相関性に基づいて、前記飲食品のレオロジー試験の結果から、「なめらかさ」、及び「べたつき」からなる評価項目の1つ以上を評価する、項1~7のいずれか1項記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
The present invention includes the following aspects;
Item 1.
A method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks, which evaluates the swallowing characteristics from the frictional characteristics of foods and drinks based on the correlation between the frictional characteristics in the tribology test and the sensory evaluation obtained in advance.
Item 2.
Item 2. The method for evaluating swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks according to Item 1, wherein the evaluation of the swallowing characteristics is an evaluation of one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion". ..
Item 3.
The correlation was obtained by preparing a plurality of liquid samples each containing a plurality of thickening components so as to have the same viscosity characteristics, and performing a tribology test and a sensory evaluation on the obtained plurality of liquid samples. , Item 1 or 2, the method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks.
Item 4.
The correlation was determined by conducting the tribology test under a plurality of conditions and selecting a condition having a high correlation between the friction coefficient and the sensory evaluation.
The evaluation of the swallowing characteristic based on the correlation is performed using the friction coefficient measured in the tribology test conducted under the same conditions as the above condition, and the swallowing characteristic of the food or drink according to any one of Items 1 to 3 is evaluated. Evaluation method.
Item 5.
The swallowing of the food or drink according to any one of Items 2 to 4, wherein two or more of the evaluation items are selected and the conditions of the tribology test when evaluating the selected evaluation items are different. How to evaluate the characteristics.
Item 6.
The method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks according to any one of Items 2 to 5, wherein the slip speed in the tribology test is as follows for each evaluation item.
In the case of "smoothness", the slip speed is 9.0 x 10-8 to 7.0 x 10-7 m / s, or 0.05 to 0.6 m / s.
In the case of "easy to swallow", the sliding speed is 0.00006 to 0.035 m / s,
In the case of "easiness of cohesion", the slip speed is 0.00014 to 0.0002 m / s or 0.015 to 0.8 m / s.
Item 7.
Item 6. The method for evaluating swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks according to any one of Items 1 to 6, wherein the normal force (load) in the tribology test is 0.1 to 1N.
Item 8.
Further, based on the correlation between the result of the rheology test obtained in advance and the sensory evaluation, one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "smoothness" and "stickiness" are evaluated from the result of the rheology test of the food and drink. , The method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of a food or drink according to any one of Items 1 to 7.

本発明によれば、トライボロジー試験の条件を好適化することで、飲食品の「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、「まとまりやすさ」などの嚥下特性と、トライボロジー試験での摩擦特性との相関性が高くなるため、当該相関性に基づいて、飲食品のトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性から、これらの嚥下特性を精度良く評価することができる。その結果、トライボロジー試験で得られる摩擦特性を使用した簡易な方法で、飲食品の嚥下特性を精度良く評価することができる飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法を提供することができた。 According to the present invention, by optimizing the conditions of the tribology test, the swallowing characteristics such as "smoothness", "easy to swallow", and "easy to organize" of food and drink and the friction characteristics in the tribology test can be obtained. Since the correlation is high, these swallowing characteristics can be accurately evaluated from the friction characteristics in the tribology test of foods and drinks based on the correlation. As a result, it was possible to provide a method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks, which can accurately evaluate the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks, by a simple method using the frictional characteristics obtained in the tribology test.

実施例における各試料A~Gに対する「なめらかさ」の官能評価の結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of the sensory evaluation of "smoothness" for each sample A to G in an Example. 実施例における各試料A~Gに対する「飲み込みやすさ」の官能評価の結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of the sensory evaluation of "ease of swallowing" for each sample A to G in an Example. 実施例における各試料A~Gに対する「まとまりやすさ」の官能評価の結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of the sensory evaluation of "ease of cohesion" for each sample A to G in an Example. 実施例における各試料A~Gに対する「べたつき」の官能評価の結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of the sensory evaluation of "stickiness" for each sample A to G in an Example. 実施例において用いたトライボロジーの試験装置を示す概略図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the test apparatus of the tribology used in an Example. 実施例において用いたレオロジーの試験装置を示す概略図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the rheology test apparatus used in an Example. 実施例(トライボロジー試験)における摩擦係数と「なめらかさ」との相関性を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the correlation between the friction coefficient and "smoothness" in an Example (tribology test). 実施例(トライボロジー試験)における摩擦係数と「飲み込みやすさ」との相関性を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the correlation between the friction coefficient and "ease of swallowing" in an Example (tribology test). 実施例(トライボロジー試験)における摩擦係数と「まとまりやすさ」との相関性を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the correlation between the friction coefficient and "ease of cohesion" in an Example (tribology test). 実施例(トライボロジー試験)におけるノーマルフォース0.1Nの場合のすべり速度と摩擦係数との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the slip speed and the friction coefficient in the case of the normal force 0.1N in an Example (tribology test). 実施例(トライボロジー試験)におけるノーマルフォース0.3Nの場合のすべり速度と摩擦係数との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the slip speed and the friction coefficient in the case of the normal force 0.3N in an Example (tribology test). 実施例(トライボロジー試験)におけるノーマルフォース1Nの場合のすべり速度と摩擦係数との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the slip speed and the friction coefficient in the case of a normal force 1N in an Example (tribology test). 実施例(トライボロジー試験)におけるノーマルフォース3Nの場合のすべり速度と摩擦係数との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the slip speed and the friction coefficient in the case of the normal force 3N in an Example (tribology test). ノーマルフォースが0.3Nの場合である図5Bに、各々の嚥下特性との相関性が高い領域を付加したグラフである。FIG. 5B is a graph in which a region having a high correlation with each swallowing characteristic is added to FIG. 5B in which the normal force is 0.3N. トライボロジー試験と官能評価との相関性が悪い場合の結果を示すグラフである(比較例)。It is a graph which shows the result when the correlation between a tribology test and a sensory evaluation is bad (comparative example). 実施例(レオロジー試験)における各試料についてひずみと貯蔵弾性率G’との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the strain and the storage elastic modulus G'for each sample in an Example (rheology test). 実施例(レオロジー試験)における「なめらかさ」について、ひずみが1.0%の場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G', and the sensory evaluation when the strain is 1.0% about "smoothness" in an Example (rheology test). 実施例(レオロジー試験)における「べたつき」について、ひずみが1.0%の場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G'and the sensory evaluation when the strain is 1.0% about "stickiness" in an Example (rheology test). 実施例(レオロジー試験)における各試料について周波数と貯蔵弾性率G’との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between the frequency and the storage elastic modulus G'for each sample in an Example (rheology test). 実施例(レオロジー試験)における「なめらかさ」について、角周波数が5.0rad/sの場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G', and the sensory evaluation at the time of the angular frequency of 5.0 rad / s about "smoothness" in an Example (rheology test). 実施例(レオロジー試験)における「べたつき」について、角周波数が5.0rad/sの場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフである。6 is a graph showing the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G'and the sensory evaluation when the angular frequency is 5.0 rad / s for "stickiness" in the example (rheology test).

(評価対象物)
本発明は、飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法に関するものであり、嚥下特性としては、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」からなる評価項目の1つ以上であることが好ましい。本発明では、飲食品の評価に当たって、増粘剤、分散剤、乳化剤、安定剤など、嚥下性に影響を与える成分を添加した飲食品を評価することも可能である。本発明の評価方法は、増粘成分を含有する飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法として、特に有効である。
(Evaluation target)
The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of food and drink, and the swallowing characteristics shall be one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion". Is preferable. In the present invention, in evaluating foods and drinks, it is also possible to evaluate foods and drinks to which components that affect swallowability, such as thickeners, dispersants, emulsifiers, and stabilizers, are added. The evaluation method of the present invention is particularly effective as a method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks containing a thickening component.

飲食品としては、飲料、食品が含まれ、咀嚼の有無にかかわらず経口で摂取されるものを指す。また、増粘成分は、粘性を高める作用を有する成分であり、増粘剤、飲食品に添加される添加剤であって粘性を付与するもの、飲食品に含まれている粘性成分などを指す。 Food and drink includes beverages and foods, and refers to those that are taken orally with or without chewing. Further, the thickening component is a component having an action of increasing viscosity, and refers to a thickening agent, an additive added to foods and drinks that imparts viscosity, a viscous component contained in foods and drinks, and the like. ..

飲食品としては、特に限定されず、後述するものが挙げられるが、とろみ調整食品などの介護食が重要な位置付けとなる。高齢化社会の進行により、飲み込んだ際に誤って気管に入ってしまう(=誤嚥)リスクを低減する目的で、液体にとろみを付与して、のどを通過する速度をゆるやかにした、とろみ調整食品などの介護食の開発が急がれているためである。 Foods and drinks are not particularly limited and include those described later, but long-term care foods such as thickened foods are important. With the progress of an aging society, the liquid is thickened to slow down the speed of passing through the throat in order to reduce the risk of accidentally entering the trachea (= aspiration) when swallowed. This is because the development of long-term care foods such as foods is urgently needed.

このような介護食には、増粘成分を添加した食品の他、食品以外の飲料である水、お茶、ジュースなどに増粘成分を添加したものも包含される。 Such long-term care foods include not only foods to which a thickening component is added, but also foods to which a thickening component is added to non-food beverages such as water, tea, and juice.

評価対象となる増粘剤、その他の増粘成分、分散剤としては、例えば、キサンタンガム、ウェランガム、カラギナン、グァーガム、グァーガム酵素分解物、ローカストビーンガム、アルギン酸、アルギン酸塩、グルコマンナン、でん粉、加工でん粉、化工でん粉、デキストリン、タマリンドシードガム、大豆多糖類、寒天、タラガム、ペクチン、ネイティブ型ジェランガム、脱アシル型ジェランガム、カシアガム、サイリウムシードガム、アマシードガム、サバクヨモギシードガム、トラガントガム、カラヤガム、アラビアガム、ガティガム、ラムザンガム、マクロホモプシスガム、カードラン、プルラン、サクシノグリカン、キチン、キトサン、マンナン、ゼラチン、セルロース、微結晶セルロース、微小繊維状セルロース、発酵セルロース、メチルセルロース、ヒドロキシプロピルセルロース、カルボキシメチルセルロース、ヒドロキシプロピルメチルセルロース、ヒドロキシエチルセルロース、水溶性ヘミセルロース、シトラスファイバー、こんにゃく粉等が挙げられる。これらは、同じ増粘成分であっても、製法や原料、精製方法によって、嚥下特性が変化する場合がある。また、これらを適宜混合したものや改質したものを評価対象とすることも可能である。また、本発明の評価方法によると、新たに開発した増粘剤の嚥下特性を評価したり、増粘成分と他の成分との相互作用の結果生じる嚥下特性の変化などについても評価することができる。
乳化剤、安定剤としては、例えば、グリセリン脂肪酸エステル(例えば、モノグリセリン脂肪酸エステル、ジグリセリン脂肪酸エステル、有機酸モノグリセライド、ポリグリセリン脂肪酸エステル、ポリグリセリン縮合リシノレイン酸エステル)、ショ糖脂肪酸エステル、ソルビタン脂肪酸エステル、プロピレングリコール脂肪酸エステル、ステアリン酸カルシウム、ポリソルベート、レシチン、サポニン等が挙げられる。
Examples of the thickener, other thickening components, and dispersants to be evaluated include xanthan gum, welan gum, caraginan, guar gum, guar gum enzymatic decomposition products, locust bean gum, alginic acid, arginate, glucomannan, starch, and processed starch. , Chemical starch, dextrin, tamarind seed gum, soybean polysaccharide, agar, tara gum, pectin, native gellan gum, deacylated gellan gum, cassia gum, psyllium seed gum, ama seed gum, savaku yomogi seed gum, tragant gum, karaya gum, arabic gum, gati gum , Lambzan gum, macrohomopsis gum, curdran, purulan, succinoglycan, chitin, chitosan, mannan, gelatin, cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, fine fibrous cellulose, fermented cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose , Hydroxyethyl cellulose, water-soluble hemicellulose, citrus fiber, konjac flour and the like. Even if these are the same thickening component, the swallowing characteristics may change depending on the manufacturing method, raw material, and purification method. It is also possible to evaluate a mixture of these as appropriate or a modified product. Further, according to the evaluation method of the present invention, it is possible to evaluate the swallowing characteristics of the newly developed thickener, and also evaluate the changes in swallowing characteristics resulting from the interaction between the thickening component and other components. can.
Examples of the emulsifier and stabilizer include glycerin fatty acid ester (for example, monoglycerin fatty acid ester, diglycerin fatty acid ester, organic acid monoglyceride, polyglycerin fatty acid ester, polyglycerin condensed lysinoreic acid ester), sucrose fatty acid ester, and sorbitan fatty acid ester. , Propylene glycol fatty acid ester, calcium stearate, polysorbate, lecithin, saponin and the like.

(トライボロジー試験による評価方法)
本発明の嚥下特性の評価方法では、予め求めたトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性と嚥下特性の官能評価との相関性を利用する。トライボロジー試験で測定される摩擦特性としては、摩擦係数、摩擦力などが挙げられる。官能評価の対象は、嚥下特性の評価の対象と同じものを含み、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」からなる評価項目の1つ以上が選択されることが好ましい。本発明の評価方法は、官能評価の結果を予測するための方法であり、官能評価により有意差が付くのであれば、官能評価の方法自体は、なんら限定されず、何れの官能評価方法にも対応し得る。
(Evaluation method by tribology test)
In the method for evaluating swallowing characteristics of the present invention, the correlation between the frictional characteristics and the sensory evaluation of swallowing characteristics in a tribology test obtained in advance is used. Friction characteristics measured in the tribology test include friction coefficient, friction force and the like. The target of the sensory evaluation includes the same as the target of the evaluation of the swallowing characteristic, and it is preferable that one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion" are selected. .. The evaluation method of the present invention is a method for predicting the result of sensory evaluation, and the sensory evaluation method itself is not limited to any sensory evaluation method as long as there is a significant difference in the sensory evaluation. Can be accommodated.

前記相関性は、複数の飲食品についてトライボロジー試験と官能評価を行なって求めることができる。但し、増粘成分を含有する飲食品を評価する場合、基準物性・性状が同じになるように、複数の増粘成分を各々含む複数の液体試料を調製し、得られた複数の液体試料についてトライボロジー試験と官能評価を行なって求めることが、基準物性・性状を一定にした上で、飲食品の嚥下特性を評価する観点から好ましい。基準物性・性状としては、粘度特性、重量濃度、モル濃度、貯蔵弾性率、摩擦係数、不溶性固形物の分散性、流動性等が挙げられるが、増粘成分の基本特性である粘度特性を同一にすることが好ましい。粘度特性としては、粘度、動粘度、損失弾性率などが挙げられる。 The correlation can be obtained by performing a tribology test and a sensory evaluation on a plurality of foods and drinks. However, when evaluating foods and drinks containing a thickening component, a plurality of liquid samples containing a plurality of thickening components are prepared so that the standard physical properties and properties are the same, and the obtained multiple liquid samples are used. It is preferable to perform a tribology test and a sensory evaluation from the viewpoint of evaluating the swallowing characteristics of food and drink while keeping the standard physical properties and properties constant. Reference physical properties / properties include viscosity characteristics, weight concentration, molar concentration, storage elastic modulus, friction coefficient, dispersibility of insoluble solids, fluidity, etc., but the viscosity characteristics that are the basic characteristics of the thickening component are the same. Is preferable. Viscosity characteristics include viscosity, kinematic viscosity, elastic modulus loss and the like.

相関性を求めるために使用する複数の飲食品としては、飲食品の嚥下特性の評価精度を高める観点から、3種以上が好ましく、5種以上がより好ましい。 As the plurality of foods and drinks used for obtaining the correlation, three or more kinds are preferable, and five or more kinds are more preferable, from the viewpoint of improving the evaluation accuracy of the swallowing characteristics of the foods and drinks.

相関性は、トライボロジー試験を複数の条件で行ない、摩擦係数と官能評価の相関性の高い条件を選択して決定されたものであることが好ましい。前記評価項目が2つ以上選択される場合、選択された評価項目を評価する際のトライボロジー試験の条件が各々異なる条件であることが、条件を最適化する観点から好ましい。このような条件の設定方法は、実施例の項で詳細に説明するが、トライボロジー試験におけるすべり速度が、各評価項目に対して、下記の通りであることが好ましい。 The correlation is preferably determined by conducting a tribology test under a plurality of conditions and selecting a condition having a high correlation between the friction coefficient and the sensory evaluation. When two or more evaluation items are selected, it is preferable that the conditions of the tribology test for evaluating the selected evaluation items are different from each other from the viewpoint of optimizing the conditions. The method for setting such conditions will be described in detail in the section of Examples, but it is preferable that the slip speed in the tribology test is as follows for each evaluation item.

「なめらかさ」の場合、すべり速度が9.0×10-8~7.0×10-7m/s、又は0.05~0.6m/sが好ましく、0.1~0.4m/sがより好ましい。「飲み込みやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00006~0.035m/sが好ましく、0.00014~0.0013m/sがより好ましい。「まとまりやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00014~0.0002m/s、又は0.015~0.8m/sが好ましく、0.18~0.77m/sがより好ましい。 In the case of "smoothness", the sliding speed is preferably 9.0 × 10-8 to 7.0 × 10-7 m / s, or 0.05 to 0.6 m / s, preferably 0.1 to 0.4 m / s. s is more preferable. In the case of "ease of swallowing", the sliding speed is preferably 0.00006 to 0.035 m / s, more preferably 0.00014 to 0.0013 m / s. In the case of "easiness of cohesion", the slip speed is preferably 0.00014 to 0.0002 m / s or 0.015 to 0.8 m / s, and more preferably 0.18 to 0.77 m / s.

トライボロジー試験におけるノーマルフォース(荷重)については、これが0.1~1Nの場合に、得られる摩擦特性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなるため好ましく、0.2~0.5Nの場合がより好ましい。 Regarding the normal force (load) in the tribology test, when it is 0.1 to 1N, the correlation between the obtained frictional characteristics and the swallowing characteristics is high, so it is preferable, and when it is 0.2 to 0.5N, it is more preferable. ..

本発明では、相関係数の絶対値が0.8以上となるトライボロジー試験の条件を採用することが好ましく、相関係数の絶対値として0.85以上がより好ましく、相関係数の絶対値として0.9以上が更に好ましい。 In the present invention, it is preferable to adopt the conditions of the tribology test in which the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is 0.8 or more, the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is more preferably 0.85 or more, and the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is 0.85 or more. 0.9 or more is more preferable.

本発明の評価方法は、上述した相関性に基づいて、増粘成分を含む液体試料のトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性から、嚥下特性、好ましくは「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」からなる評価項目の1つ以上を評価する。その際、相関性に基づく嚥下特性の評価は、相関性を求める際の条件と近似する条件(好ましくは同じ条件)で行なわれたトライボロジー試験で測定した摩擦特性を用いて行なうことが好ましい。
以上のように、トライボロジー試験の条件を好適化することで、嚥下特性、好ましくは「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」と、トライボロジー試験での摩擦特性との相関性が高くなるため、当該相関性に基づいて、飲食品のトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性から、これらの嚥下特性を精度良く評価することができる。
The evaluation method of the present invention is based on the above-mentioned correlation, based on the friction characteristics of a liquid sample containing a thickening component in a tribology test, the swallowing characteristics, preferably "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "cohesiveness". Evaluate one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "ease". At that time, it is preferable to evaluate the swallowing characteristics based on the correlation by using the friction characteristics measured in the tribology test conducted under the conditions similar to the conditions for obtaining the correlation (preferably the same conditions).
As described above, by optimizing the conditions of the tribology test, the correlation between the swallowing characteristics, preferably "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion" with the friction characteristics in the tribology test. Therefore, it is possible to accurately evaluate these swallowing characteristics from the friction characteristics in the tribology test of foods and drinks based on the correlation.

(レオロジー試験による評価方法)
本発明では、さらに、予め求めたレオロジー試験の結果と官能評価との相関性に基づいて、飲食品のレオロジー試験の結果から、「なめらかさ」、及び「べたつき」からなる評価項目の1つ以上を評価することができる。
(Evaluation method by rheology test)
In the present invention, further, based on the correlation between the result of the rheology test obtained in advance and the sensory evaluation, one or more evaluation items consisting of "smoothness" and "stickiness" are obtained from the result of the rheology test of food and drink. Can be evaluated.

レオロジー試験の結果として用いられる物性としては、貯蔵弾性率G’、損失弾性率G’’、又は損失正接tanδ、粘度が挙げられる。また、変化させる条件としては、せん断歪み、角周波数、せん断速度、温度が挙げられる。これらの条件を好適化することで、より高いレオロジー試験の結果と官能評価との相関性が得られる。 Physical properties used as a result of the rheology test include a storage modulus G ′, a loss modulus G ″, a loss tangent tan δ, and a viscosity. The conditions to be changed include shear strain, angular frequency, shear rate, and temperature. By optimizing these conditions, a higher correlation between rheological test results and sensory evaluation can be obtained.

本発明では、相関係数の絶対値が0.8以上となるレオロジー試験の条件を採用することが好ましく、相関係数の絶対値として0.85以上がより好ましく、相関係数の絶対値として0.87以上が更に好ましい。 In the present invention, it is preferable to adopt the conditions of the rhology test in which the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is 0.8 or more, the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is more preferably 0.85 or more, and the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is 0.85 or more. 0.87 or more is more preferable.

(対象となる飲食品)
飲食品の種類は特に制限されないが、具体的には、当該飲食品の例は、
水、牛乳、乳飲料、乳酸菌飲料、発酵乳飲料、炭酸飲料、果実飲料(例:果汁飲料、果汁入り清涼飲料、果汁入り炭酸飲料、果肉飲料)、野菜飲料、野菜及び果実飲料、コーヒー飲料、ココア飲料、粉末飲料、スポーツ飲料、機能性飲料、イオン飲料、ビタミン補給飲料、栄養補給バランス飲料、サプリメント飲料等の飲料類;
紅茶飲料、緑茶、ブレンド茶等の茶飲料類(なお、飲料類と茶飲料類は、「飲料」に包含される。);
日本酒、ビール、発泡酒、ビールテイスト風アルコール飲料、焼酎、ウィスキー、ブランデー、ワイン、スピリッツ類( ラム、ウォッカ、ジン、テキーラ等) 、リキュール類、エタノール等それぞれ単独の飲料、および前記飲用アルコール類を配合した各種カクテル類、あるいは果汁を醸造して得た赤ワイン等の果実酒等のアルコール飲料類;
コンソメスープ、ポタージュスープ、クリームスープ、中華スープ等のスープ類;
味噌汁、清汁、シチュウ、カレー、グラタン等の液状食品類;
セパレートドレッシング、ノンオイルドレッシング、ケチャップ、たれ、醤油、ソース等の液体調味料類;
蛋白質・リン・カリウム調整食品、塩分調整食品、油脂調整食品、整腸作用食品、カルシウム・鉄・ビタミン強化食品、低アレルギー食品、濃厚流動食、ミキサー食、及びキザミ食等の特殊食品や治療食類:
を包含する。
当該飲食品の例は、これらの製品の半製品、及び中間製品等も包含する。
(Target food and drink)
The type of food and drink is not particularly limited, but specifically, examples of the food and drink are
Water, milk, dairy drinks, lactic acid bacteria drinks, fermented milk drinks, carbonated drinks, fruit drinks (eg fruit juice drinks, soft drinks with fruit juice, carbonated drinks with fruit juice, fruit meat drinks), vegetable drinks, vegetable and fruit drinks, coffee drinks, Beverages such as cocoa beverages, powdered beverages, sports beverages, functional beverages, ion beverages, vitamin supplement beverages, nutritional balance beverages, supplement beverages, etc.;
Tea beverages such as black tea beverages, green tea, and blended tea (Beverages and tea beverages are included in "beverages");
Japanese liquor, beer, sparkling liquor, beer-taste-style alcoholic beverages, shochu, whiskey, brandy, wine, spirits (ram, voca, gin, tequila, etc.), liqueurs, ethanol, etc. Various mixed cocktails, or alcoholic beverages such as fruit liquor such as red wine obtained by brewing fruit juice;
Soups such as consomme soup, pottage soup, cream soup, Chinese soup;
Liquid foods such as miso soup, fresh juice, stew, curry, gratin;
Liquid seasonings such as separate dressing, non-oil dressing, ketchup, sauce, soy sauce, sauce;
Special foods such as protein / phosphorus / potassium-adjusted foods, salt-adjusted foods, fat-adjusted foods, intestinal-regulating foods, calcium / iron / vitamin-enriched foods, hypoallergenic foods, concentrated liquid foods, mixer foods, and shaving foods Kind:
Including.
Examples of the food and drink include semi-finished products of these products, intermediate products and the like.

以下、実施例を挙げて本発明を説明するが、本発明の範囲はこれらにより限定されるものではない。 Hereinafter, the present invention will be described with reference to examples, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

(液体試料の調製)
トライボロジー試験等での試験結果と官能評価との相関性を求めるために、トライボロジー試験等に用いる液体試料A~Gを調製した。各々の液体試料A~Gの調製には、増粘成分の主原料として表1に示す成分を含む市販のとろみ調整食品(A~E)又は多糖類素材(F~G)を用いた。
(Preparation of liquid sample)
Liquid samples A to G used for the tribology test and the like were prepared in order to obtain the correlation between the test result in the tribology test and the like and the sensory evaluation. For the preparation of each of the liquid samples A to G, a commercially available thickened food (A to E) or a polysaccharide material (FG) containing the components shown in Table 1 was used as the main raw material of the thickening component.

Figure 0007101056000001
Figure 0007101056000001

イオン交換水に上記のとろみ調整食品又は多糖類素材を溶解させ、20℃、ずり速度50s-1での粘度が約200mPa・s(嚥下調整食学会分類2013:中間のとろみ)となるように調整した。 Dissolve the above-mentioned thickening-adjusted food or polysaccharide material in ion-exchanged water, and adjust the viscosity to about 200 mPa · s (Swallowing adjusted food society classification 2013: intermediate thickening) at 20 ° C. and a shear rate of 50s -1 . did.

(官能評価)
被験者は20代~40代の男女7名であり、摂取方法として、とろみ液である各液体試料A~G15gを1回で全量飲み込み方法を採用した。評価方法としては、VAS(Visual analog scale)法による絶対評価とした。その際、評価項目:「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、「まとまりやすさ」、「べたつき」について、最低を0、最高を100とし、男女7名の平均値を算出した。
(sensory evaluation)
The subjects were 7 men and women in their 20s to 40s, and as an ingestion method, a method of swallowing 15 g of each liquid sample A to G, which is a thickening liquid, at one time was adopted. As an evaluation method, an absolute evaluation was performed by the VAS (Visual analog scale) method. At that time, for the evaluation items: "smoothness", "easy to swallow", "easy to organize", and "stickiness", the minimum was 0 and the maximum was 100, and the average value of 7 men and women was calculated.

その結果を図1A~図1Dにそれぞれ示した。各試料A~Gで官能評価の結果は異なっていた。 The results are shown in FIGS. 1A to 1D, respectively. The results of the sensory evaluation were different for each sample A to G.

(トライボロジー試験)
各試料A~Gについて、トライボロジー試験を図2に示す装置を用いて行なった。具体的には、試験機(MCR300、アントンパール社製)の回転部冶具をガラスボールとし、接触部冶具をポリジメチルシロキサン(PDMS)とし、温度:20℃、ノーマルフォース:0.1N~3Nの間で任意に設定し、すべり速度:1.0x10-7m/s→1.0m/sで、摩擦係数を測定した。
(Tribology test)
For each sample A to G, a tribology test was performed using the apparatus shown in FIG. Specifically, the rotating part jig of the testing machine (MCR300, manufactured by Anton Pearl Co., Ltd.) is a glass ball, the contact part jig is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), the temperature is 20 ° C., and the normal force is 0.1N to 3N. The friction coefficient was measured at a slip speed of 1.0 x 10-7 m / s → 1.0 m / s.

(レオロジー試験)
レオロジー試験を、図3に示す装置を用いて行なった。具体的には、試験機(MCR300、アントンパール社製)の測定冶具を50mmコーンプレートとし、温度:20℃、ひずみ依存性粘弾性測定ではせん断歪みを0.01%→500%とし、周波数依存性粘弾性測定では、角周波数を0.1rad/s→100rad/sとし、ずり依存性粘度測定ではせん断速度0.01s-1→500s-1の条件で測定した。
(Rheology test)
The rheology test was performed using the device shown in FIG. Specifically, the measuring tool of the testing machine (MCR300, manufactured by Anton Pearl Co., Ltd.) is a 50 mm cone plate, the temperature is 20 ° C., and the shear strain is changed from 0.01% to 500% in the strain-dependent viscoelastic measurement, and the frequency is dependent. In the viscous elasticity measurement, the angular frequency was set to 0.1 rad / s → 100 rad / s, and in the shear-dependent viscosity measurement, the shear rate was 0.01 s -1 → 500 s -1 .

(トライボロジー試験と官能評価との相関性)
トライボロジー試験の条件であるノーマルフォース及びすべり速度を変えて、各試料A~Gについて摩擦係数の測定を行ない、摩擦係数と各試料A~Gの官能評価の結果から、摩擦係数と官能評価の相関係数を求めた。「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、「まとまりやすさ」、「べたつき」について求めた相関係数を、表2~表5にそれぞれ示した。なお、表中の網かけ部分は、相関係数の絶対値が0.8以上のセルに付している。
(Correlation between tribology test and sensory evaluation)
The friction coefficient was measured for each sample A to G by changing the normal force and sliding speed, which are the conditions of the tribology test, and the friction coefficient and the phase of the sensory evaluation were obtained from the results of the friction coefficient and the sensory evaluation of each sample A to G. I asked for the number of relationships. Tables 2 to 5 show the correlation coefficients obtained for "smoothness", "easy to swallow", "easy to organize", and "stickiness", respectively. The shaded area in the table is attached to the cell whose absolute value of the correlation coefficient is 0.8 or more.

Figure 0007101056000002
Figure 0007101056000002

Figure 0007101056000003
Figure 0007101056000003

Figure 0007101056000004
Figure 0007101056000004

Figure 0007101056000005
Figure 0007101056000005

表2~表5のうち、表5の「べたつき」については網かけ部分が殆どなかったが、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」については、網かけ部分が一定以上の範囲で存在した。このことは、増粘成分のトライボロジー試験の条件を好適化することで、得られる摩擦特性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなる(すなわち、相関係数の絶対値が一定以上となる)ことを示している。そして、増粘成分に限らず、すべての飲食品について、摩擦特性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなることを示唆しており、当該相関性に基づいて、飲食品のトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性から、嚥下特性を精度良く評価することができる。 Of Tables 2 to 5, there was almost no shaded part for "stickiness" in Table 5, but the shaded part was constant for "smoothness", "easy to swallow", and "easy to organize". It existed in the above range. This means that by optimizing the conditions of the tribology test of the thickening component, the correlation between the obtained friction characteristics and the swallowing characteristics becomes high (that is, the absolute value of the correlation coefficient becomes a certain value or more). Shows. It is suggested that the correlation between the friction characteristics and the swallowing characteristics is high for all foods and drinks, not limited to the thickening component, and based on the correlation, the friction characteristics in the tribology test of the foods and drinks. Therefore, the swallowing characteristics can be evaluated with high accuracy.

そして、下記の条件において、得られる摩擦特性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなった。
「なめらかさ」の場合、すべり速度が9.99×10-8~6.55×10-7m/s、又は0.052079~0.58435m/s、
「飲み込みやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.000063095~0.030432m/s、
「まとまりやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00014125~0.00018479m/s、又は0.017783~0.76444m/s。
Then, under the following conditions, the correlation between the obtained frictional characteristics and the swallowing characteristics became high.
In the case of "smoothness", the slip speed is 9.99 × 10-8 to 6.55 × 10-7 m / s, or 0.052079 to 0.58435 m / s,
In the case of "easy to swallow", the sliding speed is 0.000063095 to 0.030432 m / s,
In the case of "easiness of cohesion", the slip speed is 0.00014125 to 0.00018479 m / s, or 0.017783 to 0.76444 m / s.

また、ノーマルフォース(荷重)が0.1~1Nの場合に、広い条件で得られる摩擦特性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなっており、特に0.3Nの場合がより高い相関性が得られた。 Further, when the normal force (load) is 0.1 to 1N, the correlation between the friction characteristics obtained under a wide range of conditions and the swallowing characteristics is high, and especially when the normal force is 0.3N, a higher correlation is obtained. Was done.

このため、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」について、ノーマルフォースが0.3Nの場合の相関性を示すグラフを図4A~図4Cにそれぞれ示した。なお、図4Aではすべり速度が0.26m/s、図4Bではすべり速度が0.0004m/s、図4Cではすべり速度が0.76m/sの条件が選択されている。図4A~図4Cの結果が示すように、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」について、高い相関性が得られている。 Therefore, graphs showing the correlations of "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion" when the normal force is 0.3N are shown in FIGS. 4A to 4C, respectively. The conditions of the slip speed of 0.26 m / s in FIG. 4A, the slip speed of 0.0004 m / s in FIG. 4B, and the slip speed of 0.76 m / s are selected in FIG. 4C. As the results of FIGS. 4A to 4C show, a high correlation is obtained with respect to "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion".

そして、ノーマルフォースが0.1N、0.3N、1N、3Nの場合について、各試料のすべり速度と摩擦係数との関係を図5A~図5Dに示した。図5Dでは、各試料の摩擦係数に差が出にくく、このことは、ノーマルフォース(荷重)が0.1~1Nの場合に、高い相関性が得られ易いことを示唆している。 Then, in the case where the normal force is 0.1N, 0.3N, 1N, and 3N, the relationship between the slip speed of each sample and the friction coefficient is shown in FIGS. 5A to 5D. In FIG. 5D, the coefficient of friction of each sample is unlikely to differ, which suggests that a high correlation can be easily obtained when the normal force (load) is 0.1 to 1N.

図6には、ノーマルフォースが0.3Nの場合である図5Bに、各々の嚥下特性との相関性が高い領域を付加して図示している。この図が示すように、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」について、相関性が高い領域が異なっている。 FIG. 6 is shown by adding a region having a high correlation with each swallowing characteristic to FIG. 5B in which the normal force is 0.3N. As this figure shows, the areas with high correlation are different for "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion".

(トライボロジー試験と官能評価との相関性が悪い場合:比較例)
比較のために、トライボロジー試験と官能評価との相関性が悪い場合の結果を図7に示す。図7は、ノーマルフォースが3N、すべり速度が0.00008m/sの場合について、摩擦係数と「飲み込みやすさ」との相関性を示すグラフである。この図が示すように、「飲み込みやすさ」の評価について、すべり速度が適切であっても、ノーマルフォースが適切でないと、相関性が低くなるため、相関性に基づく増粘成分の嚥下特性評価が困難となる。
(When the correlation between the tribology test and the sensory evaluation is poor: comparative example)
For comparison, FIG. 7 shows the results when the correlation between the tribology test and the sensory evaluation is poor. FIG. 7 is a graph showing the correlation between the friction coefficient and “easiness to swallow” when the normal force is 3N and the slip speed is 0.00008 m / s. As shown in this figure, regarding the evaluation of "ease of swallowing", even if the sliding speed is appropriate, if the normal force is not appropriate, the correlation will be low, so the evaluation of the swallowing characteristics of the thickening component based on the correlation. Becomes difficult.

(レオロジー試験と官能評価との相関性)
レオロジー試験の条件であるせん断歪み及び角周波数を変えて、各試料A~Gについての測定を行ない、貯蔵弾性率G’、損失弾性率G’’、又は損失正接tanδと、各試料A~Gの「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、「まとまりやすさ」、「べたつき」についての官能評価の結果から、各物性と官能評価の相関係数を求めた。また、レオロジー試験の条件であるせん断速度を変えて、各試料A~Gについての測定を行ない、粘度と各試料A~Gの「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、「まとまりやすさ」、「べたつき」についての官能評価の結果から、粘度と官能評価の相関係数を求めた。せん断歪み、角周波数及びせん断速度を変えた場合について求めた相関係数を、表6~表8にそれぞれ示した。なお、表中の網かけ部分は、相関係数の絶対値が0.8以上のセルに付している。
(Correlation between rheology test and sensory evaluation)
Measurements were performed for each sample A to G by changing the shear strain and angular frequency, which are the conditions of the rheology test. From the results of the sensory evaluation of "smoothness", "easy to swallow", "easy to organize", and "stickiness", the correlation coefficient between each physical property and the sensory evaluation was obtained. In addition, the shear rate, which is the condition of the rheology test, is changed to measure each sample A to G, and the viscosity and "smoothness", "easy to swallow", "easy to organize" of each sample A to G, From the results of the sensory evaluation of "stickiness", the correlation coefficient between the viscosity and the sensory evaluation was obtained. The correlation coefficients obtained when the shear strain, the angular frequency and the shear rate are changed are shown in Tables 6 to 8, respectively. The shaded area in the table is attached to the cell whose absolute value of the correlation coefficient is 0.8 or more.

Figure 0007101056000006
Figure 0007101056000006

Figure 0007101056000007
Figure 0007101056000007

Figure 0007101056000008
Figure 0007101056000008

表6~表8の結果から、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」については網かけ部分が殆どなかったが、「なめらかさ」、及び「べたつき」については、網かけ部分が一定以上の範囲で存在した。このことは、増粘成分のレオロジー試験の条件を好適化することで、得られる物性と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなる(すなわち、相関係数の絶対値の上限が一定以上となる)ことを示している。また、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」については、レオロジー試験の条件を好適化しても、増粘成分の嚥下特性評価が困難であることを示している。 From the results of Tables 6 to 8, there was almost no shaded part for "easy to swallow" and "easy to organize", but for "smoothness" and "stickiness", the shaded part was above a certain level. It existed in the range of. This means that by optimizing the conditions for the rheology test of the thickening component, the correlation between the obtained physical properties and the swallowing characteristics becomes high (that is, the upper limit of the absolute value of the correlation coefficient becomes a certain value or more). Is shown. Further, regarding "ease of swallowing" and "ease of cohesion", it is shown that it is difficult to evaluate the swallowing characteristics of the thickening component even if the conditions of the rheology test are optimized.

図8Aには、レオロジー試験の結果に基づき、各試料についてひずみと貯蔵弾性率G’との関係を示した。また、図8Bは、「なめらかさ」について、ひずみが1.0%の場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフであり、図8Cは、「べたつき」について、ひずみが1.0%の場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフである。表6に示すように、ひずみが0.01~6.58%の範囲で貯蔵弾性率G’は、「なめらかさ」と相関がみられ、ひずみが0.01~15%の範囲で貯蔵弾性率G’は、「べたつき」と相関がみられた。 FIG. 8A shows the relationship between strain and storage modulus G'for each sample based on the results of the rheology test. Further, FIG. 8B is a graph showing the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G'when the strain is 1.0% and the sensory evaluation for "smoothness", and FIG. 8C shows the strain for "stickiness". It is a graph which shows the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G'in the case of 1.0%, and the sensory evaluation. As shown in Table 6, the storage elastic modulus G'in the range of 0.01 to 6.58% of strain is correlated with "smoothness", and the storage elasticity is in the range of 0.01 to 15% of strain. The rate G'correled with "stickiness".

図9Aには、レオロジー試験の結果に基づき、各試料について周波数と貯蔵弾性率G’との関係を示した。また、図9Bは、「なめらかさ」について、角周波数が5.0rad/sの場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフであり、図9Cは、「べたつき」について、角周波数が5.0rad/sの場合の貯蔵弾性率G’と官能評価との相関性を示すグラフである。表7に示すように、0.1~100rad/sにおいて、貯蔵弾性率G’は、「なめらかさ」と相関がみられ、2.09~75.9rad/sにおいて、貯蔵弾性率G’は、「べたつき」と相関がみられた。このことは、増粘成分に限らず、すべての飲食品について、レオロジー試験の結果と嚥下特性との相関性が高くなり得ることを示唆しており、当該相関性に基づいて、飲食品のレオロジー試験の結果から、嚥下特性を精度良く評価することができる。
FIG. 9A shows the relationship between the frequency and the storage modulus G'for each sample based on the results of the rheology test. Further, FIG. 9B is a graph showing the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G'and the sensory evaluation when the angular frequency is 5.0 rad / s for "smoothness", and FIG. 9C is a graph showing the correlation between "stickiness" and "stickiness". It is a graph which shows the correlation between the storage elastic modulus G', and the sensory evaluation when the angular frequency is 5.0 rad / s. As shown in Table 7, at 0.1 to 100 rad / s, the storage modulus G'correlates with" smoothness ", and at 2.09 to 75.9 rad / s, the storage modulus G'is. , Correlation with "stickiness" was seen. This suggests that the correlation between the results of the rheology test and the swallowing characteristics can be high for all foods and drinks, not limited to the thickening component, and the rheology of foods and drinks is based on the correlation. From the results of the test, the swallowing characteristics can be evaluated accurately.

Claims (3)

予め求めたトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性と官能評価との相関性に基づいて、飲食品のトライボロジー試験での摩擦特性から嚥下特性を評価する飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法であって、
前記嚥下特性の評価は、「なめらかさ」、「飲み込みやすさ」、及び「まとまりやすさ」からなる評価項目の1つ以上の評価であり、
前記相関性は、同じ粘度特性を有するように、複数の増粘成分を各々含む複数の液体試料を調製し、得られた複数の液体試料についてトライボロジー試験と官能評価を行なって予め求めたものであり、
前記トライボロジー試験におけるすべり速度が、各評価項目に対して、下記の通りである、飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
「なめらかさ」の場合、すべり速度が9.0×10 -8 ~7.0×10 -7 m/s、又は0.05~0.6m/s、
「飲み込みやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00006~0.035m/s、
「まとまりやすさ」の場合、すべり速度が0.00014~0.0002m/s、又は0.015~0.8m/s。
It is a method of evaluating the swallowing characteristics of foods and drinks, which evaluates the swallowing characteristics from the frictional characteristics of foods and drinks based on the correlation between the frictional characteristics in the tribology test and the sensory evaluation obtained in advance.
The evaluation of the swallowing characteristic is an evaluation of one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "smoothness", "ease of swallowing", and "ease of cohesion".
The correlation was obtained in advance by preparing a plurality of liquid samples each containing a plurality of thickening components so as to have the same viscosity characteristics, and performing a tribology test and a sensory evaluation on the obtained plurality of liquid samples. can be,
A method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of food and drink, wherein the slip speed in the tribology test is as follows for each evaluation item.
In the case of "smoothness", the sliding speed is 9.0 x 10-8 to 7.0 x 10-7 m / s, or 0.05 to 0.6 m / s.
In the case of "easy to swallow", the sliding speed is 0.00006 to 0.035 m / s,
In the case of "easiness of cohesion", the slip speed is 0.00014 to 0.0002 m / s or 0.015 to 0.8 m / s.
前記トライボロジー試験におけるノーマルフォース(荷重)が0.1~1Nである、請求項1に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。 The method for evaluating swallowing characteristics of food and drink according to claim 1 , wherein the normal force (load) in the tribology test is 0.1 to 1N. さらに、予め求めたレオロジー試験の結果と官能評価との相関性に基づいて、前記飲食品のレオロジー試験の結果から、「なめらかさ」、及び「べたつき」からなる評価項目の1つ以上を評価する、請求項1に記載の飲食品の嚥下特性の評価方法。
Further, based on the correlation between the result of the rheology test obtained in advance and the sensory evaluation, one or more of the evaluation items consisting of "smoothness" and "stickiness" are evaluated from the result of the rheology test of the food and drink. , The method for evaluating the swallowing characteristics of a food or drink according to claim 1 .
JP2018114565A 2018-06-15 2018-06-15 Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink Active JP7101056B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018114565A JP7101056B2 (en) 2018-06-15 2018-06-15 Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018114565A JP7101056B2 (en) 2018-06-15 2018-06-15 Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019219185A JP2019219185A (en) 2019-12-26
JP7101056B2 true JP7101056B2 (en) 2022-07-14

Family

ID=69096165

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018114565A Active JP7101056B2 (en) 2018-06-15 2018-06-15 Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7101056B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20240219281A1 (en) * 2021-03-12 2024-07-04 San-Ei Gen F.F.I., Inc. Method for evaluating texture upon swallowing foods or drinks and method for producing formulation for improving swallowing texture

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006109723A (en) 2004-10-13 2006-04-27 Meiji Milk Prod Co Ltd Easily swallowing liquid composition
JP2006129783A (en) 2004-11-05 2006-05-25 Nisshi:Kk Swallowing food base material and method for producing the same
JP5548612B2 (en) 2007-06-05 2014-07-16 カーギル インコーポレイテッド Evaluation method of mouthfeel characteristics of foods using tribology equipment
US20150068273A1 (en) 2013-09-06 2015-03-12 Anton Paar Gmbh Tribometer, rheometer, module and a method for tribological measurements
WO2017014290A1 (en) 2015-07-23 2017-01-26 株式会社明治 Fermented milk and method for producing same
JP2017078666A (en) 2015-10-21 2017-04-27 不二製油株式会社 Method for evaluating chewing/swallowing suitability of gelatinous food
JP2017104465A (en) 2014-12-27 2017-06-15 三栄源エフ・エフ・アイ株式会社 Evaluation method of ingesta deglutition sensation

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006109723A (en) 2004-10-13 2006-04-27 Meiji Milk Prod Co Ltd Easily swallowing liquid composition
JP2006129783A (en) 2004-11-05 2006-05-25 Nisshi:Kk Swallowing food base material and method for producing the same
JP5548612B2 (en) 2007-06-05 2014-07-16 カーギル インコーポレイテッド Evaluation method of mouthfeel characteristics of foods using tribology equipment
US20150068273A1 (en) 2013-09-06 2015-03-12 Anton Paar Gmbh Tribometer, rheometer, module and a method for tribological measurements
JP2017104465A (en) 2014-12-27 2017-06-15 三栄源エフ・エフ・アイ株式会社 Evaluation method of ingesta deglutition sensation
WO2017014290A1 (en) 2015-07-23 2017-01-26 株式会社明治 Fermented milk and method for producing same
JP2017078666A (en) 2015-10-21 2017-04-27 不二製油株式会社 Method for evaluating chewing/swallowing suitability of gelatinous food

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019219185A (en) 2019-12-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Besbes et al. Adding value to hard date (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Compositional, functional and sensory characteristics of date jam
Raikos et al. Use of β-glucan from spent brewer's yeast as a thickener in skimmed yogurt: Physicochemical, textural, and structural properties related to sensory perception
Moret-Tatay et al. Commercial thickeners used by patients with dysphagia: Rheological and structural behaviour in different food matrices
Osundahunsi et al. Comparison of the physicochemical properties and pasting characteristics of flour and starch from red and white sweet potato cultivars
Germain et al. Rheological characterization of thickened beverages used in the treatment of dysphagia
Zheng et al. Influence of bamboo shoot dietary fiber on the rheological and textural properties of milk pudding
JP7101056B2 (en) Evaluation method of swallowing characteristics of food and drink
Gayathry Production of nata de coco-a natural dietary fibre product from mature coconut water using Gluconacetobacter xylinum (sju-1)
Chetachukwu et al. Effect of short‐chain inulin on the rheological and sensory characteristics of reduced fat set coconut milk yoghurt
Ribes et al. Physical, sensory, and simulated mastication properties of texture-modified Spanish sauce using different texturing agents
CN113736713A (en) Weissen's lactobacillus paraguatus NC516·11 and exopolysaccharide and application thereof
Şahin et al. Effect of some hydrocolloids on the serum separation of different formulated ketchups
Hou et al. Physicochemical, rheological and sensory properties of different brands of sesame pastes
JP7031825B2 (en) Tomato ketchup with improved storage stability
CN106942380A (en) A kind of yoghourt stabilizer containing tamarind gum and its application in Yoghourt is prepared
CN104792721A (en) Method for determining bitterness of bamboo shoot
CN104777192A (en) Detection method of food sweetness degree
Bayili et al. Technological properties of indigenous Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from Lait caillé, a spontaneous fermented milk from Burkina Faso
CN106665846A (en) Tara gum-containing yoghurt stabilizing agent and application thereof to preparation of yoghurt
CN101856123B (en) Composite nutrient peptone and production method thereof
CN105136613A (en) Evaluation method of rice starch retrogradation
CN111965280B (en) Method for rapidly determining sugar mixing ratio of Dangshan pear syrup
CN105076406B (en) A kind of leben and preparation method thereof rich in levulan
Arora et al. Development of Yoghurt ‘‘rich-in’’dietary fiber and its physico-chemical characterization
Onweluzo et al. Detarium microcarpum polysaccharide as a stabilizer in processed fruit products

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20210601

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20220309

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220405

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220510

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20220630

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20220704

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7101056

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150