JP6990442B2 - Permeability evaluation method and device for filter membrane - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the water permeability of a water treatment filter membrane made of a reverse osmosis membrane or the like, and an apparatus for carrying out the method.

Conventionally, as shown in Patent Documents 1 and 2, for example, a filter membrane (filtration membrane) such as a reverse osmosis membrane or a nanofiltration membrane is used as one of the water treatment devices for removing a specific component contained in the water to be treated. Membrane filtration devices are widely used in practical use. A filter membrane such as a reverse osmosis membrane basically has a separation functional layer formed on one side of a support layer, and a specific component to be removed in an electrolytic solution as water to be treated is permeated by the separation functional layer. It has the function of blocking and separating from the solvent.

For this type of filter membrane, there is a need to know the water permeability, that is, the ease of permeation of the solvent. That is, since it is inevitable that this filter membrane will be clogged due to fouling (dirt) during continued use, the degree of clogging can be known by examining the water permeability, and the filter membrane should be replaced or backwashed. It can be used as a guide. Further, in addition to the water permeability that changes due to this clogging, there is also a demand for grasping the water permeability that the filter membrane originally has. That is, when producing this type of filter membrane, pinholes may occur in the membrane due to dust, etc., but if the inherent water permeability of the membrane material can be evaluated, it is useful for optimizing the synthesis of the membrane material. On the other hand, it is possible to classify the causes of characteristic deterioration due to the occurrence of pinholes on unintended processes. This distinguishes between the essential improvement in water permeability of the membrane and the membrane defects that occur in the process, and enables efficient start-up of the manufacturing process.

The term "water permeability" as used herein does not limit the solvent of the electrolytic solution to water (H ₂ O). That is, this "water permeability" indicates the ease with which the solvent in the electrolytic solution permeates the filter membrane regardless of the electrolytic solution.

Conventionally, as one of the methods for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane, a method of directly measuring the amount of a solvent permeating by applying a pressure in the water permeation direction of the filter membrane is known. Further, as another method for evaluating the water permeability of the filter membrane, for example, as shown in Patent Document 2, an AC is applied to the electrolytic solution in which the filter membrane is immersed, and one of the filter membranes is subjected to the condition. A method of measuring the impedance between one side and the other side (the front side and the rear side of filtration) and evaluating the water permeability based on the measured impedance is also known. This method can easily evaluate the water permeability while actually using the filter membrane, and is mainly applied to evaluate the water permeability that changes due to the above-mentioned clogging.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 1-228509 Special Table 2018-513383 Gazette

In the above method of directly measuring the amount of the permeating solvent, it is difficult to evaluate the water permeability of the non-defective part (the part showing the original performance of the membrane) without pinholes separately from the influence of pinholes. Met. Therefore, in this method, the water permeability may be improperly evaluated due to the influence of pinholes, and more specifically, the appearance may be improved. Further, the method for evaluating water permeability based on the above impedance measures the change in impedance due to the diffusion polarization layer on the surface of the separation function layer formed due to dirt or the like, and is inherently possessed by the membrane. It did not evaluate the permeability.

The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method capable of evaluating the water permeability inherent in a filter membrane with high accuracy. Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus capable of carrying out such a method for evaluating the water permeability of a filter film.

The method for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane according to the present invention is
A method for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane such as a reverse osmosis membrane having a support layer and a separation function layer.
Immerse the filter membrane in the electrolyte and
An alternating current of one or more frequencies is applied to the electrolytic solution through electrodes arranged on one side and the other side in the water permeation direction with a filter membrane in between.
The impedance between one side and the other side of the filter film is measured under the condition that alternating current is applied.
Pressure is applied to the electrolytic solution from one side or the other side of the filter membrane to apply pressure.
It is characterized in that the water permeability of the filter film is evaluated based on the relaxation characteristic of the impedance corresponding to the one or more frequencies with respect to the pressure.
The above-mentioned AC application, impedance measurement, and pressure application do not necessarily have to be performed in the same order as described above. For example, the pressure may be applied in parallel with the AC application before the impedance measurement.

Here, the frequency is specifically, for example, a frequency in the range of 200 Hz or more and 2 MHz or less, more preferably in the range of 2 kHz or more and 200 kHz or less.

Further, in the method for evaluating the permeability of a filter membrane according to the present invention, more specifically, the permeability is evaluated based on the relaxation time τ and / or the amount of change in conductance corresponding to the impedance ΔG in the relaxation characteristics with respect to the pressure of the impedance. ..

Further, in the method for evaluating the water permeability of the filter membrane according to the present invention,
Sweep the AC frequency between the first and second frequencies,
Repeat this frequency sweep multiple times,
It is desirable to evaluate the permeability based on the impedance measured at each frequency sweep.

However, such frequency sweeping may not be particularly performed, and the impedance corresponding to one predetermined specific frequency may be measured and the permeability may be evaluated based on the relaxation characteristic for the applied pressure.

Further, it is desirable that the impedance is measured between the electrodes to which the alternating current is applied. The electrodes used in that case are not limited to one pair, that is, two electrodes. In the measurement of this type of impedance, as shown in Patent Document 2 described above, it has been conventionally proposed to apply a 4-terminal impedance measurement method using a 4-electrode arrangement, and this 4-terminal impedance measurement method has been proposed. Can also be applied to the method for evaluating the water permeability of a filter film according to the present invention.

On the other hand, the water permeability evaluation device for the filter membrane according to the present invention is
A device for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane such as a reverse osmosis membrane having a support layer and a separation function layer.
A container that stores the electrolytic solution and holds the filter membrane in a state of being immersed in the electrolytic solution.
A pressure applying means for applying pressure to the electrolytic solution from one side or the other side in the water permeation direction with a filter membrane in between.
An alternating current application means for applying an alternating current of one or more frequencies to the electrolytic solution via the electrodes arranged on one side and the other side, respectively.
An impedance measuring instrument that measures the impedance between one side and the other side of the filter membrane,
A means for analyzing the permeability based on the relaxation characteristics of the impedance corresponding to one or more frequencies measured by this impedance measuring instrument with respect to the pressure.
It is characterized by having.

If the filter membrane is a reverse osmosis membrane,
It is desirable that the pressure applying means applies pressure to the electrolytic solution from the same side of the one side and the other side to which pressure is applied when desalting by reverse osmosis, and further, the reverse. It is more desirable that pressure can be applied to the electrolytic solution from the side opposite to the side to which pressure is applied when desalting by permeation.

According to the method for evaluating the permeability of a filter membrane according to the present invention, the permeability is evaluated based on the relaxation characteristics of impedance corresponding to one or more frequencies with respect to pressure application. Therefore, this frequency is appropriately used. By selecting it, it is possible to measure the change in impedance corresponding to the support layer portion (particularly the support layer near the separation functional layer) without defects such as pinholes described above. As a result, it is possible to accurately evaluate the water permeability inherent in the filter film by eliminating the influence of defective portions such as pinholes. Therefore, if this method is applied in the filter membrane manufacturing process, it is possible to immediately grasp whether the original water permeability characteristics of the membrane are obtained and whether defects such as pinholes have occurred, and the manufacturing process is short. It is also possible to give feedback in time.

On the other hand, the water permeability evaluation device for the filter membrane according to the present invention includes the container as described above, the pressure applying means, the alternating current applying means, the impedance measuring instrument, and the means for analyzing the water permeability. It is possible to carry out the method for evaluating the water permeability of the filter film having the effect described in 1.

Schematic block diagram showing a water permeability evaluation device for a filter membrane according to an embodiment of the present invention. A graph showing the relationship between impedance-related conductance and AC frequency obtained by the device of FIG. 1 (additional pressure: at 0.073 MPa). A graph showing how the conductance shown in FIG. 2 changes according to the elapsed time for each AC frequency (additional pressure: 0.073 MPa). A graph showing the relationship between impedance-related conductance and AC frequency obtained by the device of FIG. 1 (additional pressure: at 0.123 MPa). A graph showing how the conductance shown in FIG. 4 changes according to the elapsed time for each AC frequency (additional pressure: 0.123 MPa). A table showing the relationship between the above conductance value, the amount of change in conductance, and the elapsed time for each of the three AC frequencies (additional pressure: 0.073 MPa). A table showing the relationship between the above conductance value, the amount of change in conductance, and the elapsed time for each of the three AC frequencies (additional pressure: 0.123 MPa).

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows a schematic configuration of a water permeability evaluation device for a filter membrane according to an embodiment of the present invention. First, the device of FIG. 1 will be described. This apparatus has, for example, a pressure vessel 1 made of concrete or steel plate for storing an electrolytic solution used for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane. The pressure vessel 1 is composed of a first tank 2 and a second tank 3 which are separated from each other by a filter film described later. The electrolytic solution 4 and the electrolytic solution 5 are stored in the first tank 2 and the second tank 3, respectively. In this embodiment, as an example, KCl (potassium chloride) aqueous solution or NaCl (sodium chloride) aqueous solution is used as the electrolytic solutions 4 and 5.

The pressure vessel 1 may be specially formed for evaluating the water permeability of the filter membrane, or a vessel constituting an actually operating membrane filtration device may be used. In the pressure vessel 1, a filter film 6 as an object for evaluating water permeability is held between the first tank 2 and the second tank 3. The filter membrane 6 of this example is a reverse osmosis membrane (RO membrane). Therefore, in the following, this filter film will be referred to as RO film 6.

The RO film 6 has a composite film structure composed of a non-woven fabric (not shown), a support layer 6b, and a separation function layer 6a, and the separation function layer 6a is formed on one surface side of the support layer 6b (in FIG. 1, the non-woven fabric). Is omitted). As an example, the nonwoven fabric is made of polyester, the support layer 6b is made of polysulfone, the separation functional layer 6a is made of crosslinked aromatic polyamide, the thickness of the support layer 6b is about 30 μm, and the thickness of the separation functional layer 6a is about 200 nm. The RO membrane 6 held as described above is in a state of being immersed in the electrolytic solutions 4 and 5 at the time of evaluation of water permeability.

In the first tank 2 and the second tank 3, the first electrode 7 and the second electrode 8 are arranged, respectively, with the retained RO film 6 placed between them so as to face each other. The electrical connection between the first electrode 7 and the second electrode 8 will be described in detail later.

The electrolytic solution 4 may be stored in the first tank 2 in a state where pressure is applied. Hereinafter, the configuration for that purpose will be described. For example, a gas cylinder 11 filled with high-pressure air is connected to a first reservoir (storage container) 13 via a pipe 12. A valve 14 is interposed in the pipe 12 that communicates with each of the internal spaces of the gas cylinder 11 and the first reservoir 13. It is desirable that the valve 14 is, for example, a regulator (pressure regulating valve) provided in the gas cylinder 11 and capable of adjusting the pressure applied to each internal space of the first reservoir 13 and the first tank 2. .. The first reservoir 13 stores the electrolytic solution 4, and the internal space thereof is communicated with the internal space of the first tank 2 via the pipe 15.

As described above, the same configuration as that provided for the first tank 2 is also provided for the second tank 3. The configuration will not be explained one by one, but the corresponding elements will be described below. The gas cylinder 21, the pipe 22, the second reservoir 23 for storing the electrolytic solution 5, the valve 24, and the pipe 25 provided for the second tank 3 are the gas cylinder 11, the pipe 12, and the pipe 12 provided for the first tank 2. , The first reservoir 13, the valve 14, and the pipe 15, respectively.

The above configuration shown in FIG. 1 is used for evaluating the water permeability of the RO membrane 6, but in performing the evaluation, it operates in the same manner as a general membrane filtration device actually used. Will be done. In that case, the pressure applied to the internal space of the first tank 2, that is, the electrolytic solution 4 from the gas bomb 11 via the pipe 12, the valve 14, the first reservoir 13, and the pipe 15 is P ₁ , and the pressure applied from the gas bomb 21 to the pipe 22 and the valve. 24, the pressure applied to the internal space of the second tank 3, that is, the electrolytic solution 5 via the second reservoir 23 and the pipe 25 is P ₂ , and the osmotic pressure in the RO film 6 is assumed to be 0 (zero).
P ₁ > P ₂
If set to, the electrolytic solution 4 in the first tank 2 permeates the RO membrane 6 and permeates the second tank 3 side.

At that time, ions in the electrolytic solution 4, other impurities, and the like are blocked from permeation by the separation functional layer 6a of the RO membrane 6. That is, when the device of FIG. 1 functions as a water permeability evaluation device or a membrane filtration device, the water permeation direction is the direction from the first tank 2 to the second tank 3. Therefore, in this case, the electrolytic solution 4 in the first tank 2 is a so-called concentrated liquid, and the electrolytic solution 5 in the second tank 3 is a so-called permeated liquid.

When the device shown in FIG. 1 is operated as a general membrane filtration device, the osmotic pressure Π may act from the permeate side to the concentrate side. In that case, the applied pressures P ₁ and P ₂ are applied.
P ₁ -P ₂ > Π
The membrane is filtered by reverse osmosis.

The first electrode 7 in the first tank 2 and the second electrode 8 in the second tank 3 described above are connected to the impedance meter 33 via connection lines 31 and 32, respectively. As will be described later, the impedance meter 33 constitutes an alternating current applying means for applying alternating current to the electrolytic solutions 4 and 5 via the first electrode 7 and the second electrode 8. At the same time, the impedance meter 33 measures the impedance between the first electrode 7 and the second electrode 8, that is, between one side and the other side of the RO film 6 in the water permeation direction. An analysis unit 34 made of, for example, a computer system is connected to the impedance meter 33, and a display unit 35 made of, for example, a liquid crystal display device is connected to the analysis unit 34.

Next, the water permeability evaluation method of the present embodiment, which is performed using the above apparatus, will be described with an example. In the following, the measured impedance and the like that change with the passage of time are expressed as a function of the time t, and the time t indicates the reference time described later as t = 0 (zero). Therefore, each procedure performed in carrying out this method is performed at a time point before time t = 0, at a time point t = 0, and at a time point after time t = 0. There will be three things. The time zone in which each of these three procedures is executed is expressed as t <0, t = 0, and t> 0 in the above-mentioned description order, that is, in the order of passage of time.

Further, in the apparatus of FIG. 1, the pressure applied to the electrolytic solution 4 of the first tank 2 is P ₁ and the pressure applied to the electrolytic solution 5 of the second tank 3 is P ₂ as described above. If the osmotic pressure acts from the electrolytic solution 4 to the electrolytic solution 5 side, it is referred to as Π ₁ , and if the osmotic pressure acts from the electrolytic solution 5 to the electrolytic solution 4 side, it is referred to as Π ₂ .

[Procedure 1] When t <0 In this case, the equilibrium state is reached, that is, the medium of the electrolytic solution 5 or the electrolytic solution 4 does not move through the RO membrane 6. This equilibrium state is most simply the case where Π ₁ = Π ₂ and P ₁ = P ₂ = 0. It should be noted that the equilibrium state is similarly obtained when Π ₁ − P ₁ = Π ₂ under the condition that Π ₁ > Π ₂ is satisfied, but here, the explanation will be continued assuming the simplest case described above.

Under this equilibrium state, alternating current is applied from the impedance meter 33 to the electrolytic solutions 4 and 5 via the first electrode 7 and the second electrode 8. In this example, alternating current is performed by sweeping the frequency within the range of 200 Hz or more and 2 MHz or less. This frequency sweep is repeated 12 times with a cycle of 40 s (seconds) as an example. When the alternating current is applied in this way, the impedance meter 33 measures the impedance between the first electrode 7 and the second electrode 8, that is, between one side and the other side of the RO film 6 in the water permeation direction. This impedance measurement result is input to the analysis unit 34.

The analysis unit 34 measures the frequency dependence of the complex impedance Z from the input impedance measurement result. That is, assuming that the AC frequencies for measuring the dependence are n ways of f ₁ , f ₂ , f ₃ ... f _n , the analysis unit 34 sets Z (f ₁ ), Z (f ₂ ), Z (f ₃ ). ... Find Z (f _n ). Further, the analysis unit 34 decomposes the complex impedance Z into a G (conductance) component and a C (capacitance) component.
{G (f ₁ ), C (f ₁ )}, {G (f ₂ ), C (f ₂ )}, {G (f ₃ ), C (f ₃ )} ...
Let {G (f _n ), C (f _n )}. The analysis unit 34 stores the data related to the G component thus obtained in the built-in memory.

[Procedure 2] When t = 0 With this time as a reference time, for example, the valve 14 shown in FIG. 1 is opened. As a result, Π ₁ = Π ₂ , P ₁ > 0, P ₂ = 0, and the pressure P ₁ is applied to the electrolytic solution 4 of the first tank 2. Due to this pressure application, the medium of the electrolytic solution 4 of the first tank 2 flows from the separation functional layer 6a to the inside of the support layer 6b, permeates the RO membrane 6, and the water permeation to flow to the second tank 3 starts. That is, the above-mentioned equilibrium state changes to an unbalanced state at this time t = 0. Also in this case, the same AC application and impedance measurement as in the case of [Procedure 1] are performed in parallel with the pressure application, and the impedance measurement result is stored in the built-in memory of the analysis unit 34. The AC application and impedance measurement may be performed before the pressure application to the electrolytic solution 4 is started.

[Procedure 3] When t> 0, the valve 14 is kept open, and the states of Π ₁ = Π ₂ , P ₁ > 0, and P ₂ = 0 are maintained. The frequency-swept AC application and impedance measurement described above are continued from the above [Procedure 1]. In this [Procedure 3], the analysis unit 34 determines the frequency f and time t of the applied AC. Each complex impedance Z (f, t) is measured. Also at this time, the analysis unit 34 decomposes the complex impedance Z into a G (conductance) component and a C (conductance) component to obtain the complex impedance Z. That is, more specifically, the real part and the imaginary part of the complex impedance Z are ReZ and ImZ, respectively, and the angular frequency is ω.
ReZ = 1 / G, ImZ = − (1 / ωC).

The analysis unit 34 stores, in particular, the G component in the built-in memory as a function G (f, t) of the frequency f and the time t. That is, the first frequency sweep is G (f ₁ , t ₁ ), G (f ₂ , t ₂ ) ... G (f _n , t _n ).
The second time, G (f ₁ , t _{1 + T} ), G (f ₂ , t _{2 + T} ) ... G (f _n , t _{n + T} )
・
・
The mth time is G (f ₁ , t _{1+ (m-1) T} ), G (f ₂ , t _{2+ (m-1) T} ) ... G (f _n , t _{n + (m-1) T} )
Is recorded. The T is the frequency sweep cycle (seconds), and in this example, it is 40 s (seconds) as described above. This completes the impedance measurement and returns P ₂ = 0 in preparation for the next measurement.

In this example, m = 12 and n = 17. That is, the impedance measurement is performed by repeating the frequency sweep 12 times, and the impedance measurement is performed for each of 17 different frequencies at the time of one frequency sweep. FIG. 2 shows an example of the relationship between the conductance G (unit: S: Siemens) obtained by this measurement and the AC frequency f. Further, FIG. 3 shows how the conductance G changes according to the elapsed time, separately for each AC frequency f. The relationship shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 is when the pressure P ₁ applied to the electrolytic solution 4 of the first tank 2 is 0.073 MPa. Further, the relationship similar to that shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 when the applied pressure P ₁ is changed to 0.123 MPa is shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, respectively.

[Procedure 4]
Next, the analysis unit 34 analyzes the water permeability of the RO membrane 6 from the relaxation characteristics for the pressure applied to the RO membrane 6 based on the conductance G obtained as described above. That is, the analysis unit 34 is the data string related to the conductance G obtained in the above procedure 3.
G ( _fi , ti), G ( _fi , ti _{+ T )} , G ( _fi , ti _{+ 2T} ) ...
From (i = 1, 2, 3 ...), the data G ( _fi , t _<0 ) obtained in the procedure 1, and the data G ( _fi , ₀ ) obtained in the procedure 2.
G ( _fi , t) = G0 + ΔG (e ^{− (t / τ)} -1) (when t ≧ 0)
G ( _fi , t) = G0 (when t <0)
As a result, the conductance change amount ΔG from the time t = 0 to infinity and the relaxation time τ are obtained. Specifically, the obtained data is fitted to the above equation by the least squares method using a computer, a spreadsheet application, or the like, and G0, ΔG, and τ are obtained.

Basically, it can be evaluated that the smaller the relaxation time τ and the larger the conductance change amount ΔG, the better the water permeability of the RO membrane 6. Therefore, if the values of τ and ΔG obtained by the analysis unit 34 are displayed on the display unit 35, for example, the evaluator can grasp the water permeability of the RO membrane 6 from the display. Alternatively, these values of τ and ΔG may be fed back to the manufacturing process of the RO film 6 to minimize the occurrence of defective products.

As is the case with this embodiment, it is desirable that the frequency of the applied alternating current is a value within the range of 200 Hz or more and 2 MHz or less. By applying frequencies in this range, changes in ion concentrations such as K ⁺ and Cl ⁻ in the electrolytic solution inside the support layer 6b of the RO membrane 6 can be captured, and as a result, the permeability of the RO membrane 6 can be accurately measured. Can be evaluated. Basically, the lower the frequency, the more observable the state of water permeability in the portion of the support layer 6b close to the separation function layer 6a. However, if the frequency is close to 200 Hz, it may be observed under the influence of the separation function layer 6a. Therefore, from the viewpoint of observation accuracy, it is more preferable that this frequency is set to a value in the range of 2 kHz or more and 200 kHz or less.

Here, in FIGS. 6 and 7, the values of G0, ΔG, and τ obtained in the method of the present embodiment when the electrolytic solution is KCl (concentration: 10 mM) are applied at 2 kHz, 20 kHz, and 200 kHz. A case is extracted and shown. FIG. 6 shows the values when the applied pressure P ₁ is 0.073 MPa, and FIG. 7 shows the values when the applied pressure P ₁ is 0.123 MPa. The unit of G0 and ΔG is μS (micro Siemens).

As shown in comparison with these figures, at _each frequency, the larger the applied pressure P1, the smaller the relaxation time τ and the larger the conductance change amount ΔG. The larger the applied pressure P ₁ , the larger the amount of water that permeates the RO membrane 6, and this result indicates that the higher the water permeability of the RO membrane 6, the smaller τ and the larger ΔG. Therefore, it can be said that the water permeability of the RO membrane 6 can be evaluated by applying a constant pressure and measuring τ and ΔG. The change width and ΔG of the value of τ that changes by changing the applied pressure P ₁ are maximum in the case of 2 kHz, which is the lowest AC frequency. Therefore, in order to detect the change in the value of τ and ΔG with higher sensitivity, it is desirable to lower the frequency of the alternating current.

In the embodiment described above, the pressure P1 applied to the RO membrane 6 is applied from the electrolytic solution ₄ toward the electrolytic solution 5 side in the same manner as in the case of performing filtration by reverse osmosis using the RO membrane 6. There is. In this case, as a result of the gradual concentration of ions such as K ⁺ and Cl ⁻ in the vicinity of the separation functional layer 6a of the RO membrane 6, the water permeability of the RO membrane 6 can be evaluated. However, on the contrary, the pressure P ₂ in the direction from the electrolytic solution 5 toward the electrolytic solution 4 may be applied to the RO membrane 6. In that case, ions such as K ⁺ and Cl ⁻ in the vicinity of the separation function layer 6a of the RO membrane 6 are gradually diluted, but the permeability of the RO membrane 6 can be evaluated in the same manner. Is.

1 Pressure vessel 2 Pressure vessel 1st tank 3 Pressure vessel 2nd tank 4 Electrolyte (concentrate)
5 Electrolyte (permeate)
6 RO membrane 6a RO membrane separation functional layer 6b RO membrane support layer 7 1st electrode 8 2nd electrode 11, 21 Gas cylinder 12, 15, 22, 25 Piping 13 1st reservoir 14, 24 Valve 23 2nd reservoir 31, 32 Connection line 33 Impedance meter 34 Analysis unit 35 Display unit

Claims (9)

It is a method of evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane having a support layer and a separation function layer.
The filter membrane is immersed in the electrolytic solution, and the filter film is immersed in the electrolytic solution.
An alternating current of one or more frequencies is applied to the electrolytic solution via electrodes arranged on one side and the other side in the water permeation direction with the filter membrane in between.
The impedance between one side and the other side of the filter film was measured under the condition that the alternating current was applied.
Pressure is applied to the electrolytic solution from one side or the other side of the filter membrane to apply pressure.
A method for evaluating the permeability of a filter membrane, which comprises evaluating the permeability of the filter membrane based on the relaxation characteristic of the impedance corresponding to the one or a plurality of frequencies with respect to the pressure. The method for evaluating the permeability of a filter film according to claim 1, wherein the frequency is in the range of 200 Hz or more and 2 MHz or less. The method for evaluating the permeability of a filter membrane according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the permeability is evaluated based on the relaxation time τ and / or the change amount ΔG of the conductance corresponding to the impedance in the relaxation characteristic of the impedance with respect to the pressure. The frequency is swept between the first frequency and the second frequency.
Repeat this frequency sweep multiple times,
The method for evaluating the permeability of a filter membrane according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the permeability is evaluated based on the impedance measured at each frequency sweep. The method for evaluating the permeability of a filter film according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the impedance is measured between the electrodes to which the alternating current is applied. The method for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the water permeability of the reverse osmosis membrane as the filter membrane is evaluated. A device for evaluating the water permeability of a filter membrane having a support layer and a separation function layer.
A container that stores the electrolytic solution and holds the filter membrane in a state of being immersed in the electrolytic solution.
A pressure applying means for applying pressure to the electrolytic solution from one side or the other side in the water permeation direction with a filter membrane in between.
An alternating current application means for applying an alternating current of one or more frequencies to the electrolytic solution via electrodes arranged on one side and the other side, respectively.
An impedance measuring instrument that measures the impedance between one side and the other side of the filter film,
A means for analyzing the permeability based on the relaxation characteristics of the impedance corresponding to one or more frequencies measured by the impedance measuring instrument with respect to the pressure.
A water permeability evaluation device for a filter membrane having. The filter membrane is a reverse osmosis membrane.
The pressure applying means applies pressure to the electrolytic solution from the same side of the one side and the other side as the side to which the pressure is applied when the reverse osmosis membrane is formed.
The water permeability evaluation device for a filter membrane according to claim 7. The water permeability evaluation of the filter membrane according to claim 8, wherein the pressure applying means can apply pressure from the side opposite to the side to which the pressure is applied when the reverse osmosis membrane is formed on one side and the other side. Device.

Images