JP6986731B2 - Cultivation history details check processing method - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a cultivation history detail check processing method for managing the cultivation history.

In each area, for example, managers such as direct sales offices create and distribute cultivation guidelines for each cultivated item. The shipper cultivates with reference to this cultivation guideline, and the pesticides used for cultivation are handwritten to the manager.
However, handwritten information is unclear and has incorrect entries, and the management burden on the administrator is heavy, making it difficult to introduce traceability.
Patent Document 1 proposes a food traceability system for agricultural products, which allows the sales manager of the agricultural product to easily confirm that the agricultural product is safe and can show the fact to the consumer.
In Patent Document 1, the master data of the producer or the producer organization, the guideline / plan information data on the fertilization and control of the crop, the ledger data of the field where the crop is cultivated, and the fertilization and control of the cultivated crop for each field. It is equipped with a quality control database that includes a pesticide database that records and accumulates information on certified pesticides and actual data that records the results of harvesting, and the server device that manages this database is the producer or production. Each group is equipped with a progress management means that displays information on whether or not the cultivation of cultivated crops is proceeding as planned, as requested, and the production activities of each producer in each field proceed according to the set plan. It makes it easy to know whether or not it is done through the network.
Patent Document 2 proposes a cultivation history management device for ensuring food safety and security.
In Patent Document 2, in the information management means for transmitting the record of the history of pesticides and fertilizers in the cultivation process of the producer as information, the mark sheet for entering the cultivation history of the producer, the OMR for reading the information on the mark sheet, and the OMR are used. It has an input means for inputting the cultivation history of the producer who has been read and decoded into a personal computer, a storage means for storing the history from the input means in a database, and a management means for managing the cultivation history of the producer at the collection point.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2005-31875 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-326563

However, for pesticides that are important to be managed in terms of traceability, guidelines on how to use them, such as when and how many times they are used, have been issued, and it is extremely difficult to determine whether or not the method of using pesticides is appropriate.

Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a cultivation history detail check processing method capable of determining whether or not a pesticide complies with a guideline regarding a method of use.

In the cultivation history detail check processing method of the present invention according to claim 1, the detail items of the cultivation history are registered according to the work, the fertilizer to be used, and the pesticide to be used, and the work date is set in each of the details. Cultivation history detail check processing method for determining the suitability of the pesticide usage method for cultivation history data having day data, in which the server extracts the detail item in which the work date data is registered. The step, the pesticide detail item extraction step for extracting the detail item registered as the pesticide from the detail items extracted in the cultivation history detail extraction step as the pesticide detail item, and the pesticide detail item extraction step for extracting the pesticide. An application information acquisition step for acquiring application information for the pesticide in the pesticide specification item, and a pesticide check processing step for determining the suitability of the usage method of the pesticide based on the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step. In the pesticide check processing step, when the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step includes a time of use for a specific work, the specification extracted in the cultivation history detail extraction step. The specific work search step for searching the detailed item of the specific work from the items, the work date data registered in the detailed item of the specific work extracted in the specific work search step, and the pesticide detail. From the work date data registered in the pesticide detailed item extracted in the item extraction step, a timing determination processing step for determining whether or not the usage time corresponds to the specific work acquired in the application information acquisition step. And, when it is determined in the timing determination processing step that it corresponds to the usage time, OK output is output, when the detail item of the specific work cannot be extracted in the specific work search step, and the use in the timing determination processing step. It is characterized by having a result output step of performing NG output when it is determined that the time does not apply.
According to the second aspect of the present invention, in the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the first aspect, in the pesticide check processing step, the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step is added to the total number of times the pesticide is used for the pesticide. If is included, the total number of pesticide use count steps for totaling the number of pesticide items in the pesticide item in which the same pesticide as the pesticide in the pesticide item extracted in the pesticide item extraction step is registered. And the total number of pesticide use determination processing step for determining whether the number of pesticide items aggregated in the total number of pesticide use total step is less than or equal to the total number of pesticide use acquired in the application information acquisition step, and the total pesticide use. It is characterized by having a warning output step for outputting a warning when it is determined in the usage count determination processing step that the total number of uses of the pesticide has been exceeded.
According to the third aspect of the present invention, in the cultivation history detail check processing method according to claim 1 or 2, in the pesticide check processing step, the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step is added to the pesticide. When the total number of times of use of the specific component is included, the pesticide of the pesticide item item in which the same specific component as the specific component in the pesticide item item extracted in the pesticide item item extraction step is registered. A component that determines whether the number of pesticide items aggregated in the component total usage count aggregation step for totaling the number of items and the pesticide item totaling step is equal to or less than the total component usage count acquired in the application information acquisition step. It is characterized by having a total number of times of use determination processing step and a warning output step of outputting a warning when it is determined in the step of determining the total number of times of use of the component that the total number of times of use of the component has been exceeded.
According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, in the cultivation history detail check processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, the server performs the specific operation from the text data regarding the time of use for the pesticide. The reference value data is created by separating and extracting the timing data corresponding to the above, the context data for the timing data, and the number of days data for the timing data, and the source information data that cannot be created as the reference value data is registered. It has a time data conversion step, the time determination processing step is performed using the reference value data created in the usage time data conversion step, and the result output step is performed when the source information data is included. It is characterized by performing confirmation output.

According to the present invention, when the usage time is included in the application information, the time can be determined by using the work date of the detailed item of the specific work and the work date of the pesticide detailed item.

Image diagram of cultivation history data to be processed by the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the embodiment of the present invention. Conceptual diagram showing the processing flow of the same cultivation history detail check processing method Explanatory diagram showing the usage time data conversion step in the cultivation history detail check processing method Block diagram showing the device used for the cultivation history detail check processing method by the function realization means

In the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the details extracted by the cultivation history detail extraction step in which the server extracts the detail item in which the work date data is registered and the cultivation history detail extraction step. A pesticide detail item extraction step that extracts the detail item registered as a pesticide from the items as a pesticide detail item, and an application information acquisition step that acquires application information for the pesticide in the pesticide detail item extracted in the pesticide detail item extraction step. It has a pesticide check processing step that determines the suitability of the pesticide usage method based on the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step, and the pesticide check processing step specifies the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step. When the usage time for the work is included, the specific work search step for searching the detailed items of the specific work from the detailed items extracted in the cultivation history detailed extraction step, and the specific work search step.
From the work date data registered in the detail item of the specific work extracted in the specific work search step and the work date data registered in the pesticide detail item extracted in the pesticide detail item extraction step, in the application information acquisition step. A timing determination processing step for determining whether or not it corresponds to the usage time for the acquired specific work, an OK output when it is determined in the timing determination processing step to correspond to the usage time, and a detail of the specific work in the specific work search step. It has a result output step of performing NG output when the item cannot be extracted and when it is determined in the timing determination processing step that it does not correspond to the usage timing. According to the present embodiment, for example, when the specific work is harvesting and the application information includes the usage time such that the pesticide must be used 14 days before the harvest, the work year of the detailed item of the specific work. The timing can be determined using the date and the work date of the pesticide item.

In the second embodiment of the present invention, in the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the first embodiment, in the pesticide check processing step, the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step includes the total number of times the pesticide is used for the pesticide. If it is included, the total number of pesticide use count steps for totaling the number of pesticide items in the pesticide item item in which the same pesticide as the pesticide in the pesticide item item extracted in the pesticide item item extraction step is registered, and the total pesticide use The total number of pesticides used in the total number of pesticide use determination processing step and the total number of pesticide use determination processing step for determining whether the number of pesticide items aggregated in the number of times aggregation step is less than or equal to the total number of pesticide use acquired in the application information acquisition step. It has a warning output step that outputs a warning when it is determined that the value exceeds. According to the present embodiment, since the detailed items are registered for each working day, it can be determined from the number of registered pesticide items that the corresponding pesticide does not exceed the total number of times the pesticide is used.

A third embodiment of the present invention is the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the first or second embodiment. In the pesticide check processing step, the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step is included in the pesticide. If the total number of times the component has been used is included for a specific component, the component that aggregates the number of pesticide items in the pesticide item item in which the same specific component as the specific component in the pesticide item item extracted in the pesticide item item extraction step is registered. The total number of ingredients used determination processing step and the total number of ingredients used to determine whether the total number of pesticide items totaled in the total number of times used total step and the total number of used ingredients totaled step is less than or equal to the total number of used ingredients acquired in the application information acquisition step. It has a warning output step that outputs a warning when it is determined in the usage count determination processing step that the total number of uses of the component has been exceeded. According to the present embodiment, since the detailed items are registered for each working day, it is possible to determine whether or not the total number of times the component has been used has been exceeded from the number of pesticide items in the pesticide detailed item in which the specific component is registered.

The fourth embodiment of the present invention is the time when the server corresponds to the specific work from the text data regarding the time of use for the pesticide in the cultivation history detail check processing method according to any one of the first to the third embodiments. It has a usage time data conversion step to create reference value data by separating and extracting data, context data for time data, and day data for time data, and registering source information data that cannot be created as reference value data. In the timing determination processing step, the reference value data created in the usage timing data conversion step is used, and in the result output step, if the source information data is included, confirmation output is performed. According to this embodiment, since the reference value data is created in the usage time data conversion step, the time can be determined by the server, and the source information data that cannot be created as the reference value data is output as confirmation required. By doing so, it is possible to support human checks that cannot be checked on the server.

Hereinafter, a cultivation history detail check processing method according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described.
FIG. 1 is an image diagram of cultivation history data to be processed by the cultivation history detail check processing method according to this embodiment.
Cultivation history data is registered by the shipper for the shipped product.
In the cultivation history, detailed items are registered for each work, fertilizer used, and pesticide used.
In FIG. 1, item 1A, 1E, and 1J are fertilizer item items, item items 1B, 1D, 1F, 1H, 1K, and 1L are pesticide item items, and item items 1C, 1G, and 1M are work item items.
Work date data can be registered for each of the item items 1A to 1H and 1J to 1M.

FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram showing a processing flow of the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the present embodiment.
The cultivation history detail check processing method according to this embodiment includes the cultivation history detail extraction step 10 for extracting the detail items in which the work date data is registered, and the detail items 1A to 1D, 1F extracted in the cultivation history detail extraction step 10. Information applied to pesticides in the pesticide detailed item extraction step 20 for extracting the detailed items registered as pesticides from 1H to 1J to 1M as pesticide detailed items and the pesticide detailed item extracted in the pesticide detailed item extraction step 20. It has an application information acquisition step 30 for acquiring the application information, and a pesticide check processing step 40 for determining the suitability of the pesticide usage method based on the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step 30.
In the cultivation history detail extraction step 10, among the detail items 1A to 1H and 1J to 1M shown in FIG. 1, items other than the detail item 1E are extracted. If the work date data is not registered, it is judged that the work has not been performed.
In the pesticide detailed item extraction step 20, the detailed items 1B, 1D, 1F, 1H, 1K, and 1L shown in FIG. 1 are extracted as pesticide history items.
The application information acquired in the application information acquisition step 30 is a usage standard determined for each pesticide, and is the dilution factor usage amount, spray liquid amount, usage time, total number of times the pesticide is used, and total of the components contained in the pesticide. There are times of use.

In the pesticide check processing step 40, when the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step 30 includes the usage time for a specific work (use time data conversion step 41A), the total number of times the pesticide is used for the pesticide is included. A case (step 41B for converting the total number of times the pesticide used) and a case (step 41C for converting the total number of times the pesticide component used) include the total number of times the component has been used for the specific component contained in the pesticide will be described below.

When there is a time of use in step 41A, the detailed items of the specific work are searched from the detailed items 1A to 1D, 1F to 1H, and 1J to 1M extracted in the cultivation history detailed extraction step 10 (specific work search step 42A). ).
As a result of the search in the specific work search step in step 42A, if there is a specific work detailed item corresponding to the specific work detailed item determination step 43A, it is determined whether or not the usage time is suitable (time determination processing step 45A).
In the timing determination processing step in step 45A, the work date data registered in the specific work detail item extracted in the specific work search step 42A and the work registered in the pesticide detail item extracted in the pesticide detail item extraction step 20. From the date data, it is determined whether or not it corresponds to the usage time for the specific work acquired in the application information acquisition step 30.
If it is determined in step 45A that it corresponds to the usage time, OK output is performed (result output step 46A).
If there is no corresponding detailed item of the specific work in step 43A, NG output is performed (result output step 47A).
If it is determined in step 45A that the usage time does not apply, NG output is performed (result output step 47A).
Step 46A for performing OK output and step 47A for performing NG output are result output steps.

For example, a case where the application information of the pesticide "ABC wettable powder" used in the detailed items 1D and 1K shown in FIG. 1 includes the use time of "up to 14 days before harvest" will be described.
In this case, since the specific work is "harvest", the detailed items related to "harvest" are searched from the detailed items 1A to 1D, 1F to 1H, and 1J to 1M extracted in the cultivation history detailed extraction step 10. ..
Since there is a detailed item 1M relating to "harvest", the timing determination process in step 45A is performed.
Because the work date data registered in the detail item 1D is "2017/4/25" and the work date data registered in the detail item 1M regarding "harvest" is "2017/6/30". , Corresponds to the usage period of "up to 14 days before harvest".
Therefore, OK output is performed for the item 1D (step 46A).
On the other hand, the work date data registered in the detail item 1K is "2017/6/25", and the work date data registered in the detail item 1M regarding "harvest" is "2017/6/30". Therefore, it does not correspond to the usage period of "up to 14 days before harvest".
Therefore, NG output is performed for the item 1K (step 47A).
In this way, when the usage time is included in the application information, the time can be determined by using the work date of the detailed item of the specific work and the work date of the pesticide detailed item.

If there is a total number of pesticide use in step 41B, the number of pesticide item items in the pesticide item item in which the same pesticide as the pesticide in the pesticide item item extracted in step 20 is registered is totaled (total number of pesticide use). Aggregation step 42B).
It is determined whether the number of pesticide items totaled in the total number of pesticide use count steps in step 42B is equal to or less than the total number of pesticide use acquired in the application information acquisition step 30 (total pesticide use count determination processing step 45B).
As a result of determination in the step of determining the total number of pesticides used in step 45B, if it is determined in step 45B that the total number of times of pesticide use has not been exceeded, no warning output is performed (warning output step 46B).
If it is determined in step 45B that the total number of times the pesticide has been used has been exceeded, a warning output is performed (warning output step 47B).

For example, a case where the application information of the pesticide "ABC wettable powder" includes the total number of times of use "within one time" will be described.
In this case, since the pesticide "ABC wettable powder" is used in the detailed items 1D and 1K shown in FIG. 1, the number of pesticide items is "2", and the total number of times of use is "within 1 time". Go over. Therefore, the warning output in step 47B is performed.
It is more preferable to perform the following treatment for the total number of times the pesticide is used.
The work date data registered in item 1D is "2017/4/25", and the pesticide "ABC wettable powder" in item 1D has not been used before "2017/4/25". ..
Therefore, the warning output is not performed for the item 1D (step 46B).
On the other hand, the work date data registered in the item 1K is "2017/6/25", and the pesticide "ABC wettable powder" in the item 1K is "2017" before "2017/6/25". Since it is used in item 1D on "/ 4/25", the number of pesticide items is "2".
Therefore, a warning is output for the item 1K (step 47B).
In this way, since the detailed items are registered for each work day, it can be determined from the number of registered pesticide items that the corresponding pesticide does not exceed the total number of times the pesticide is used.

If there is a total number of times the component has been used in step 41C, the number of pesticide items in the pesticide item item in which the same specific component as the specific component in the pesticide item item extracted in step 20 is registered is totaled (total component item). Number of uses total step 42C).
It is determined whether the number of pesticide items totaled in the total number of times of component use in step 42C is equal to or less than the total number of times of component use acquired in the application information acquisition step 30 (total number of component use determination processing step 45C).
As a result of determination in the component total usage count determination processing step in step 45C, if it is determined in step 45C that the total component usage count is not exceeded, no warning output is performed (warning output step 46C).
If it is determined in step 45C that the total number of times the component has been used has been exceeded, a warning output is performed (warning output step 47C).

For example, a case where the application information of the specific component contained in the pesticide "BC Sumithion Emulsion" includes the total number of times of use of the component "within 3 times" will be described. It is assumed that the specific component contained in the pesticide "BC Sumithion Emulsion" is also contained in the pesticide "AB Sumithion Emulsion" and "BS Sumithion Emulsion".
In this case, since the specific component is used in the detailed items 1B, 1F, 1H, and 1L shown in FIG. 1, the number of pesticide items is "4", and the total number of times the component is used is "within 3 times". Go over. Therefore, the warning output in step 47C is performed.
It is more preferable to perform the following processing for the total number of times the components are used.

The work date data registered in the item 1B is "2017/4/2", and the specific component contained in the "AB Sumithion emulsion" in the item 1B is used before "2017/4/2". It has not been.
Therefore, the warning output is not performed for the item 1B (step 46C).
The work date data registered in the item 1F is "2017/5/1", and the specific component contained in the "BS Sumithion emulsion" in the item 1F is detailed before "2017/5/1". Since it is used in item 1B, the number of pesticide items is "2", which does not exceed the total number of times the ingredient is used, which is "within 3 times".
Therefore, no warning is output for the item 1F (step 46C).
The work date data registered in the item 1H is "2017/6/2", and the specific component contained in the "BC Sumithion emulsion" in the item 1H is described before "2017/6/2". Since it is used in item 1B and item 1F, the number of pesticide items is "3", which does not exceed the total number of times the ingredient is used, which is "within 3 times".
Therefore, the warning output is not performed for the item 1H (step 46C).
On the other hand, the work date data registered in the item 1L is "2017/6/27", and the specific component contained in the "BC Sumithion emulsion" in the item 1L is before "2017/6/27". Since is used in item 1B, item 1F, and item 1H, the number of pesticide items is "4", which exceeds the total number of times the component is used as "within 3 times".
Therefore, a warning is output for the item 1L (step 47C).
In this way, since the detailed items are registered for each working day, it is possible to determine whether or not the total number of times the component has been used has been exceeded from the number of pesticide items in the pesticide detailed item in which the specific component is registered.

Next, the usage time data conversion step in the cultivation history detail check processing method according to this embodiment will be described.
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing the usage time data conversion step.
In the usage time data conversion step 41A, from the text data 2 regarding the usage time for pesticides, the time data 3A corresponding to the work name (specific work) , the context data 3B for the time data 3A, and the number of days data 3C for the time data 3A. Is separated and extracted to create the reference value data 3, and the source information data 4 that cannot be created as the reference value data 3 is registered.

For example, in FIG. 3, if the text data 2 is "up to 14 days before harvest", "harvest" is used as the time data 3A1 (3A), "before" is used as the context data 3B1 (3B), and the number of days data 3C1 (day data 3C1). As 3C), "14" is separated and extracted to create reference value data 3.
As shown in FIG. 3, the text data 2 may have a plurality of time data 3A, such as "3 months before the scheduled harvest date, but up to 45 days before the harvest". In this case, "harvest" is separated and extracted as the time data 3A1, "before" as the context data 3B1, and "90" is separated and extracted as the number of days data 3C1, and "harvest" is used as the time data 3A2, and the context data 3B2. The reference value data 3 is created by separating and extracting "until before" as the number of days data 3C2 and "45" as the number of days data 3C2.
When the text data 2 is "1 day after transplantation to 2.5 leaf stage of Novie, but up to 30 days after transplantation", "Nobie 2.5 leaf stage" that cannot be separated and extracted is included. When such data that cannot be separated and extracted is included, the text "1 day after transplantation to Nobie 2.5 leaf stage, but up to 30 days after transplantation" is used as the source information data 4 that cannot be created as the reference value data 3. Register data 2.

The reference value data 3 created in the usage timing data conversion step 41A in this way is used in the timing determination processing step 45A in FIG.
Further, when the source information data 4 is included, in the result output steps 46A and 47A, by performing confirmation output, it is possible to support a human check that cannot be checked by the server 50 (see FIG. 4).

FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the apparatus used for the cultivation history detail check processing method according to the present embodiment by the function realizing means.
The server 50 that realizes the cultivation history registration method according to the present embodiment is a periodic update change means 51, a pesticide information conversion means 52, a detailed item extraction means 53, a pesticide detailed item extraction means 54, an application information acquisition means 55, and a use time determination means. 56, a means for determining the total number of times the pesticide has been used 57, a means for determining the total number of times the component has been used 58, and a database 59 are provided.
The server 50 is connected to the pesticide information database 61, the administrator terminal processing device 62, and the shipper terminal processing device 63 via a communication network such as the Internet.

The periodic update change means 51 periodically obtains data from the pesticide information database 61, which is an external database, and registers the added, changed, and revoked pesticide data in the pesticide database 59A.
The pesticide information conversion means 52 converts the data obtained from the pesticide information database 61.
The added, changed, and expired pesticide data obtained by the periodic update changing means 51 is converted by the pesticide information converting means 52 and registered in the pesticide database 59A.
The pesticide information conversion means 52 performs a usage time data conversion process.
That is, the pesticide information conversion means 52 separates and extracts the time data 3A corresponding to the work name, the context data 3B for the time data 3A, and the number of days data 3C for the time data 3A from the text data 2 regarding the time of use for the pesticide. Then, the reference value data 3 is created, and the source information data 4 that cannot be created as the reference value data 3 is registered.

The database 59 has a pesticide database 59A and a cultivation history database 59B.
The pesticide database 59A stores pesticide data from the pesticide information database 61 converted by the pesticide information conversion means 52. The pesticide database 59A is periodically updated by the periodical update change means 51, and the pesticides that have been changed or expired are added as change and expiration information.
The cultivation history registered by the shipper is registered in the cultivation history database 59B.

The detail item extraction means 53 extracts the detail item in which the work date data is registered from the cultivation history data to be processed.
The pesticide detailed item extracting means 54 extracts the detailed items registered as pesticides as the pesticide detailed items from the detailed items extracted by the detailed item extracting means 53.
The application information acquisition means 55 acquires application information for the pesticide in the pesticide detail item extracted by the pesticide detail item extraction means 54.

The use time determination means 56 determines whether or not the pesticide is used when the application information acquired by the application information acquisition means 55 includes the use time for a specific work.
The specific work search means 56A searches for the detail item of the specific work from the detail items extracted by the detail item extraction means 53.
In the use time determination means 56B, the work date data registered in the detail item of the specific work searched by the specific work search means 56A and the work year registered in the pesticide detail item extracted by the pesticide detail item extraction means 54. From the date data, it is determined whether or not it corresponds to the usage time for the specific work acquired by the application information acquisition means 55.
In the output means 56C, if the use time determination means 56B determines that the use time is applicable, the OK output is output, and if the specific work search means 56A does not have the corresponding specific work item, the NG output is output and the use time determination is made. If it is determined in the means 56B that it does not correspond to the usage time, NG output is performed.

When the application information acquired by the application information acquisition means 55 includes the total number of times the pesticide is used, the means 57 for determining the total number of times the pesticide is used determines whether or not the number of times the pesticide is used is appropriate.
In the pesticide detailed item totaling means 57A, the number of pesticide items in the pesticide detailed item in which the same pesticide as the pesticide in the pesticide detailed item extracted by the pesticide detailed item extracting means 54 is registered is totaled.
The pesticide total number of times of use determination means 57B determines whether the number of pesticide items totaled by the pesticide detailed item totaling means 57A is equal to or less than the total number of pesticide uses acquired by the application information acquisition means 55.
The output means 57C does not output a warning when it is determined that the total number of times the pesticide has been used has not been exceeded as a result of the determination by the means 57B for determining the total number of times the pesticide has been used, and when it is determined that the total number of times the pesticide has been used has been exceeded. Outputs a warning.

When the application information acquired by the application information acquisition means 55 includes the total number of times the component has been used for the specific component contained in the pesticide, the means for determining the total number of times of use of the component 58 determines the appropriateness of the number of times the specific component has been used. ..
In the pesticide detail item totaling means 58A, the number of pesticide items of the pesticide detail item in which the same specific component as the specific component in the pesticide detail item extracted by the pesticide detail item extraction means 54 is registered is totaled.
The component total usage frequency determination means 58B determines whether the number of pesticide items aggregated by the pesticide detailed item aggregation means 58A is equal to or less than the total component usage frequency acquired by the application information acquisition means 55.
The output means 58C does not output a warning when it is determined that the total number of times the component has been used has not been exceeded as a result of the determination by the means for determining the total number of times the component has been used 58B, and when it is determined that the total number of times the component has been used has been exceeded. Outputs a warning.

According to this embodiment, since the reference value data 3 is created in the pesticide information conversion means 52, the timing can be determined by the server 50, and the source information data 4 that cannot be created as the reference value data 3 needs to be confirmed. By outputting, it is possible to support a human check that cannot be checked by the server 50.

According to the cultivation history detail check processing method of the present invention, the superiority of the traceability system can be enhanced and it can be utilized as producer information.

1A, 1E, 1J Fertilizer detail item 1B, 1D, 1F, 1H, 1K, 1L Pesticide detail item 1C, 1G, 1M Work detail item 10 Cultivation history detail extraction step 20 Pesticide detail item extraction step 30 Application information acquisition step 40 Pesticide check Processing step 41A Usage time data conversion step 42A Specific work search step 43A Specific work detail item judgment step 45A Timing judgment processing step 46A Result output step 47A Result output step 41B Total number of pesticide use data conversion step 42B Total number of pesticide use Total step 45B Agricultural chemicals Total usage count determination processing step 46B Warning output step 47B Warning output step 41C Agricultural chemical ingredient total usage count data conversion step 42C Component total usage count aggregation step 45C Component total usage count determination processing step 46C Warning output step 47C Warning output step 50 Server 51 Periodic Update change means 52 Agricultural chemical information conversion means 53 Detailed item extraction means 54 Agricultural chemicals detailed item extraction means 55 Applicable information acquisition means 56 Use time judgment means 56A Specific work search means 56B Use time judgment means 56C Output means 57 Pesticide total number of times judgment means 57A Agricultural chemicals item totaling means 57B Agricultural chemicals total usage frequency determination means 57C Output means 58 Ingredients total usage frequency determination means 58A Agricultural chemicals detailed item aggregation means 58B Ingredients total usage frequency determination means 58C Output means 59 database 59A Agricultural chemicals database 59B Cultivation history database

Claims (4)

The detailed items of the cultivation history are registered according to the work, the fertilizer used, and the pesticide used, and each of the detailed items has the work date data. It is a cultivation history detail check processing method to judge,
A cultivation history detail extraction step in which the server extracts the detail item in which the work date data is registered, and
A pesticide detail item extraction step for extracting the detail item registered as the pesticide from the detail items extracted in the cultivation history detail extraction step as a pesticide detail item, and a pesticide detail item extraction step.
The application information acquisition step for acquiring the application information for the pesticide in the pesticide specification item extracted in the pesticide specification item extraction step, and the application information acquisition step.
It has a pesticide check processing step for determining the suitability of the method of using the pesticide based on the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step.
In the pesticide check processing step,
If the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step includes the time of use for a specific work,
A specific work search step for searching the detailed item of the specific work from the detailed items extracted in the cultivation history detailed extraction step, and a specific work search step.
The work date data registered in the detail item of the specific work extracted in the specific work search step, and the work date data registered in the pesticide detail item extracted in the pesticide detail item extraction step. From the time determination processing step for determining whether or not it corresponds to the usage time for the specific work acquired in the application information acquisition step, and
If it is determined in the timing determination processing step that it corresponds to the usage time, an OK output is output, if the detail item of the specific work cannot be extracted in the specific work search step, or in the usage timing in the timing determination processing step. A cultivation history detail check processing method comprising: a result output step of performing NG output when it is determined that it does not correspond. In the pesticide check processing step,
If the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step includes the total number of times the pesticide has been used for the pesticide,
A total number of pesticide use count steps for totaling the number of pesticide items in the pesticide item in which the same pesticide as the pesticide in the pesticide item extracted in the pesticide item extraction step is registered.
A pesticide total number of times determination processing step for determining whether the number of pesticide items aggregated in the total pesticide use count step is equal to or less than the total pesticide use count acquired in the application information acquisition step.
The cultivation history detail check process according to claim 1, further comprising a warning output step that outputs a warning when it is determined that the total number of times the pesticide has been used has been exceeded in the step for determining the total number of times the pesticide has been used. Method. In the pesticide check processing step,
When the application information acquired in the application information acquisition step includes the total number of times the component has been used for the specific component contained in the pesticide,
A component total usage count totaling step for totaling the number of pesticide items in the pesticide item in which the same specific component as the specific component in the pesticide item extracted in the pesticide item extraction step is registered.
A component total usage frequency determination processing step for determining whether the number of pesticide items aggregated in the component total usage frequency aggregation step is equal to or less than the component total usage frequency acquired in the application information acquisition step.
The cultivation according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising a warning output step that outputs a warning when it is determined in the component total number of times of use determination processing step that the total number of times of component use has been exceeded. History detail check processing method. The server
From the text data regarding the usage time for the pesticide, the time data corresponding to the specific work , the context data for the time data, and the number of days data for the time data are separated and extracted to create reference value data. It has a usage time data conversion step to register source information data that cannot be created as the reference value data.
In the timing determination processing step, the reference value data created in the usage timing data conversion step is used.
The cultivation history detail check processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein in the result output step, when the source information data is included, confirmation output is performed.

Images