JP5617601B2 - Pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to an agrochemical or fertilizer usage history management system, and more particularly to a system for storing and managing information on an agricultural chemical or fertilizer usage history for a crop according to access from a terminal device.

  In today's growing interest in food safety, there is a demand for traceability to fully manage the production history in the production process of agricultural products and to reliably convey the production history to the end consumer. In particular, it is desirable to keep a history of what agricultural chemicals and fertilizers were used in the production process for individual agricultural products, and to be able to present such history information as needed according to consumer demand. .

  In order to meet such a demand, for example, the following Patent Documents 1 and 2 disclose a production history management system that manages the production history of agricultural products using a computer. A production history management system that manages cultivated farmland, sprayed agricultural chemicals, and the like is disclosed for each order.

JP 2004-334446 A JP 2009-70019 A WO2004 / 036472 Publication

  As in the examples disclosed in the above-mentioned publications, if a conventional general production history management system is used, information on agricultural chemicals and fertilizers used by producers is sequentially accumulated as usage history in the computer, and consumed. The person can access the history information via the Internet or the like as necessary.

  On the other hand, regarding the use of agricultural chemicals and fertilizers on agricultural products, the administrative agency and local governments have established standards from various viewpoints, and producers use agricultural chemicals and fertilizers with these standards in mind. It is necessary to make a plan and to actually use pesticides and fertilizers according to the plan and to keep the results as a history. For example, in order to ship a crop under the name “low pesticide vegetables”, there are standards for the number and use of pesticides. In the production process of a specific crop, If the tolerances indicated by the standards are exceeded, the crops can no longer be shipped as “low pesticide vegetables”.

  The conventional production history management system is a system that has been devised mainly to ensure traceability, so when consumers and sales distributors check the production history of individual agricultural products in the market. Can fulfill the function of efficiently providing useful information. However, a producer does not necessarily have a function of providing sufficient information in order to use agricultural chemicals and fertilizers within the range of appropriate usage standards in the process of producing agricultural products.

  Therefore, the present invention provides a pesticide or fertilizer use history management system that can provide useful information when using agricultural chemicals and fertilizers within the scope of appropriate usage standards when producers produce agricultural products. The purpose is to provide.

(1) A first aspect of the present invention is a pesticide or fertilizer use history management system that stores information on the use history of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for agricultural crops according to access from a terminal device, and manages the information.
A field area control table storage unit for storing a field area control table in which a field ID for specifying a field where the crop is cultivated and a field ID for specifying a region where the field is located are associated with each other;
An allowable range table storage unit that stores an allowable range table in which an area ID is associated with an allowable range related to the use of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for individual crops in the area specified by the area ID;
A use plan table storage unit for storing a use plan table in which a field ID and a use plan of an agrochemical or a fertilizer for a crop cultivated in a field specified by the field ID are associated with each other;
A usage record table storage unit for storing a use record table in which a field ID and a use record of an agrochemical or a fertilizer for a crop cultivated in the field specified by the field ID are associated with each other;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the field area comparison table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the field area comparison table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device A field region comparison data input / output unit that reads data constituting the field region comparison table from the field region comparison table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the allowable range table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the allowable range table storage unit. An allowable range data input / output unit for reading data constituting the range table from the allowable range table storage unit and providing the read data to the terminal device;
In response to a registration request from a terminal device, data for configuring the usage plan table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the usage plan table storage unit and used in response to a browsing request from the terminal device. A use plan data input / output unit for reading data constituting the plan table from the use plan table storage unit and providing the data to the terminal device;
In response to a registration request from a terminal device, data for configuring the usage record table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is used in response to a browsing request from the terminal device, which is written in the usage record table storage unit. A usage result data input / output unit that reads data constituting the result table from the use result table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device; and
Provided,
Usage plan data input / output section
A specific field ID, information indicating a specific crop associated with the specific field ID, and a specific use plan for the specific crop are registered as use plan registration targets from the terminal device for use plan registration. A use plan area specifying unit that reads out a specific area ID corresponding to a specific field ID by referring to the field area comparison table when given,
A use plan allowable range specifying unit that reads a specific allowable range for a specific crop corresponding to a specific area ID by referring to the allowable range table;
A use plan determination unit that determines whether or not a specific use plan is within a specific allowable range;
A use plan registration unit that performs a registration process of writing a use plan registration target in a use plan table storage unit when the use plan determination unit makes a positive determination;
A use plan warning unit that gives a warning that the use plan registration target is out of the allowable range to the terminal device for use plan registration when the use plan determination unit makes a negative determination;
In response to a browsing request from the terminal device, a part or all of the data constituting the usage plan table is read from the usage plan table storage unit, and a usage plan browsing processing unit that performs browsing processing to provide this to the terminal device;
Have
The usage data input / output section
When a predetermined field ID and a predetermined use result associated with the predetermined field ID are given as a use result registration target from the use result registration terminal device, refer to the field region comparison table. A use result area specifying unit that reads a predetermined area ID corresponding to a predetermined field ID;
By referring to the use plan table, the predetermined crop corresponding to the predetermined farm field ID is specified, and by referring to the allowable range table, the predetermined allowable range for the predetermined crop corresponding to the predetermined area ID is read out. The actual usage allowable range identification part,
A usage record determination unit that determines whether a predetermined track record or a past track record of accumulating a predetermined track record is within a predetermined allowable range;
A usage record registration unit that performs a registration process to write a use record registration target in a use record table storage unit when the use record determination unit makes a positive determination;
When the use result determination unit makes a negative determination, a use result warning unit that warns the use result registration terminal device that the use result registration target is out of the allowable range; and
In response to a browsing request from the terminal device, a part or all of the data constituting the usage record table is read from the usage record table storage unit, and a use record browsing processing unit that performs a browsing process for providing this to the terminal device;
Have
The usage plan data input / output unit has a function of accepting a correction request for correcting the contents of the usage plan table already stored in the usage plan table storage unit from the terminal device,
The use plan determination unit determines whether the correction based on the correction request is a correction away from the range boundary of the allowable range,
The use plan registration unit performs a correction based on the correction request on the use plan table storage unit when the use plan determination unit makes a positive determination about the correction request,
The usage plan warning unit warns the terminal device that made the correction request that the correction request is rejected when the usage plan determination unit makes a negative determination regarding the correction request. is there.

(2) The second aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizer according to the first aspect described above,
If the registration request is issued again for the same usage plan registration target from the usage plan registration terminal device even though the usage plan warning unit has issued a warning, the usage plan registration unit registers the usage plan. A registration process for writing the target in the use plan table storage unit is performed.

(3) The third aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizer according to the first or second aspect described above,
Even if the usage record warning unit gives a warning, if a registration request is made again for the same use record registration target from the terminal unit for use record registration, the use record registration unit registers the use record A registration process for writing the target in the usage record table storage unit is performed.

(4) The fourth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to third aspects described above.
The usage record determination unit makes an affirmative determination and issues a proximity warning when the accumulated record is within the allowable range but close to the boundary of the range,
The usage history warning section gives a preliminary warning to the terminal for usage record registration that it is close to the boundary of the allowable range when a proximity warning is issued. .

(5) The fifth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fourth aspects described above,
The usage record judgment unit checks whether the cumulative record matches the use plan by referring to the use plan table, and if it does not match the use plan, issues an unplanned warning,
When the unplanned warning is issued, the usage record warning unit issues a warning that the usage record registration terminal device does not match the usage plan.

(6) The sixth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
The tolerance table is a table including the upper limit value of the total number of times the agricultural chemical or fertilizer is used for each crop as the tolerance range,
The use plan table is a table including the plan value of the total number of times the agricultural chemical or fertilizer is used for each crop as the use plan.
The usage record table is a table that includes the date of use of pesticides or fertilizers for individual fields as usage records.
The usage plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned value of the total usage count is less than or equal to the upper limit of the total usage count,
The use result determination unit is configured to determine whether or not the cumulative use number of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers is equal to or less than the upper limit value of the total use number.

(7) The seventh aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
The tolerance table is a table including the upper limit of the number of times of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each crop as the tolerance,
The use plan table is a table including the plan values of the number of times of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each crop as a use plan,
The use result table is a table including the date of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as a use result,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned number of times of use is less than or equal to the upper limit of the number of times of use for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer,
The use result determination unit is configured to determine whether or not the cumulative number of uses is less than or equal to the upper limit value of the number of uses for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer.

(8) The eighth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
The tolerance range table is a table including the upper limit value of each agricultural chemical or fertilizer for each crop as the tolerance range,
The usage plan table is a table including the planned values of the usage amounts of individual agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for each crop as the usage plan.
The use result table is a table including the use amount at the time of individual use for each agricultural field or fertilizer for each field, as the use result.
The usage plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned amount of usage is less than or equal to the upper limit of the usage amount for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer,
The use result determination unit is configured to determine whether or not each usage amount or cumulative usage amount is less than or equal to the upper limit value of the usage amount for each of the individual agricultural chemicals or fertilizers.

(9) The ninth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
The tolerance range table is a table including the tolerance range of the dilution rate at the time of use of each agricultural chemical or fertilizer for each crop as the tolerance range,
The use plan table is a table including the plan value of the dilution rate at the time of use of each agricultural chemical or fertilizer for each crop as a use plan,
The use result table is a table including the dilution rate at the time of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as the use result,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned value of the dilution factor is within the allowable range of the dilution factor for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer,
The use result determination unit is configured to determine whether or not the dilution rate at the time of use is within the allowable range of the dilution rate for each agricultural chemical or fertilizer.

(10) The tenth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
An active ingredient table storage unit for storing an active ingredient table indicating an active ingredient contained in each pesticide or fertilizer;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the active ingredient table is fetched from the terminal device and written into the active ingredient table storage unit, and valid in response to a browsing request from the terminal device. An effective component data input / output unit that reads data constituting the component table from the effective component table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device; and
Further provided,
The allowable range table is a table including the upper limit value of the number of times each active ingredient is used for each crop as the allowable range,
The usage plan table is a table including the planned value of the number of times each active ingredient is used for each crop as a usage plan,
The use result table is a table including the date of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as a use result,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned value of the number of times of use is less than or equal to the upper limit of the number of times of use for each active ingredient,
The use result determination unit calculates the cumulative number of times of use for each individual active ingredient by referring to the active ingredient table, and determines whether the calculated cumulative number of uses is less than or equal to the upper limit of the number of times of use. It is what I do.

(11) The eleventh aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
An active ingredient table storage unit for storing an active ingredient table indicating an active ingredient contained in each pesticide or fertilizer and its content rate;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the active ingredient table is fetched from the terminal device and written into the active ingredient table storage unit, and valid in response to a browsing request from the terminal device. An effective component data input / output unit that reads data constituting the component table from the effective component table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device; and
Further provided,
The allowable range table is a table including the upper limit value of the amount of each active ingredient for each crop as the allowable range,
The usage plan table is a table including the planned values of the usage amounts of the individual active ingredients for each crop as the usage plan,
The use result table is a table including the use amount at the time of individual use for each agricultural field or fertilizer for each field, as the use result.
The usage plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned amount of usage is less than or equal to the upper limit of the usage amount for each active ingredient,
The usage record determination unit calculates the cumulative usage for each of the active ingredients by referring to the active ingredient table, and determines whether the calculated cumulative usage is equal to or less than the upper limit of the usage. It is what I do.

(12) The twelfth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
For each agrochemical or fertilizer, a harvesting regulation table storage unit that stores a harvesting regulation table that indicates a harvesting regulation period that regulates the harvesting of crops after use of the agrochemical or fertilizer;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the harvesting regulation table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the harvesting regulation table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device, the harvesting is performed. A harvesting regulation data input / output unit that reads data constituting the regulation table from the harvesting regulation table storage unit and performs browsing processing to provide this to the terminal device;
Further provided,
The use result table is a table including the date of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as a use result,
The use result warning unit calculates the harvest control time for the crops grown in each field by referring to the use result table and the harvest control table, and further has a function of presenting this to the terminal device. Is.

(13) In the thirteenth aspect of the present invention, in the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fifth aspects described above,
An authorization revocation table storage unit for storing an authorization revocation table indicating that the use authorization for each pesticide or fertilizer has expired;
In response to the registration request from the terminal device, the registration process for reading the data for configuring the authorization revocation table from the terminal device and writing it in the authorization revocation table storage unit, and the authorization in response to the browsing request from the terminal device An authorization revocation data input / output unit that reads the data constituting the revocation table from the authorization revocation table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device,
Further provided,
The use plan judgment unit refers to the authorization revocation table, determines that the use plan for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers whose use authorization has expired is always outside the allowable range,
The use result determination unit refers to the authorization revocation table, and determines that the use result of the agricultural chemical or fertilizer whose use authorization has expired is always outside the allowable range.

(14) The fourteenth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the thirteenth aspect described above,
The usage plan data input / output unit and the usage record data input / output unit have a function of recognizing the user of the terminal device when receiving access from the terminal device,
When the usage plan data input / output unit performs the registration process of registering the usage plan in the usage plan table, it also registers information that identifies the user who registered the usage plan,
When the usage plan data input / output unit and usage result data input / output unit receive access from a terminal device, the usage plan table and authorization revocation table are referred to, and the usage plan registered by the accessing user Is included in the terminal device, and if it is included, warning information indicating that the pesticide or fertilizer has expired is displayed on the terminal device. It has the function to perform further.

(15) The fifteenth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fourteenth aspects described above,
Each data input / output unit has a function of recognizing a user of the terminal device by a pre-registered account and password when receiving an access from the terminal device. Data registration and browsing are permitted within the scope of certain access rights.

(16) The sixteenth aspect of the present invention is the use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the first to fourteenth aspects described above,
When there is a progress confirmation request from the terminal device, the usage plan data input / output unit and the usage result data input / output unit work together to accumulate the usage plan in the usage plan table and the usage result accumulated in the usage result table. The progress confirmation information shown in contrast is provided.

(17) In a seventeenth aspect of the present invention, the agrochemical or fertilizer use history management system according to the first to sixteenth aspects described above is configured by incorporating a program into a computer.

  The use history management system for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers according to the present invention includes an allowable range table for recording the allowable ranges for the use of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for individual agricultural products, and the agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for agricultural products grown in each field. A use plan table for recording the use plan and a use result table for recording the use results of the agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for the crops cultivated in each field are prepared. Then, when the producer registers the use plan of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers and the actual use in the table, it is checked whether or not the registration target is within the range of the use standard set in the tolerance table, and the range is set. If exceeded, a warning is given. Therefore, producers can be warned if they try to register usage plans and actual results that exceed the range of use standards, and obtain useful information for using pesticides and fertilizers within the appropriate use standards. be able to.

  In addition, when local governments and others set their own standards for the use of pesticides and fertilizers, the permissible standard range will vary from region to region, but each field is associated with information that identifies the region. By adopting an embodiment in which an area comparison table is prepared, the area to which each farm belongs can be specified, and the usage plan and usage results to be registered are set to a specific allowable range set independently for the area. A warning can be given if exceeded. Therefore, even when an original standard is set for each region, it is possible to flexibly cope with it.

  Furthermore, when registering the usage record, even if it does not exceed the allowable range, if it is close to the boundary of the allowable range, a producer can It can recognize that it is approaching the boundary, and can be reflected in future schedules. Similarly, by adopting an embodiment in which a warning is given when the usage plan is not met even if the allowable range is not exceeded, the producer can recognize that he / she has deviated from the planned plan. Can be reflected. Further, when the usage plan is corrected, if the same determination as that at the time of registration is performed, a warning can be received even if the corrected plan is out of the allowable range. Furthermore, if the modification is permitted only when the modification is a modification away from the range boundary of the allowable range, only the plan change that imposes stricter conditions than the originally registered use plan is permitted. It is possible to prevent the person from relaxing the condition from the middle.

  Permissible ranges for the use of pesticides or fertilizers include the upper limit of the total number of uses, the upper limit of the number of uses for each pesticide or fertilizer, the upper limit of the amount used for each pesticide or fertilizer, and the individual pesticide or fertilizer Since the contents such as the range of the dilution ratio at the time of use can be set, the standard can be set by various methods according to the demands of producers, consumers, distributors and the like. Furthermore, if an embodiment in which an active ingredient table showing active ingredients contained in individual agricultural chemicals or fertilizers is prepared, it is possible to set an allowable range for the number of uses and usage for each active ingredient. Become. In addition, if an embodiment is prepared in which a harvest regulation table indicating the harvest regulation period that regulates the harvest of crops after the use of a specific pesticide or fertilizer is used, useful information such as the harvest regulation time will be provided to the producer. Is also possible. In addition, if an embodiment is used in which an authorization revocation table is prepared to indicate that the authorization for use of individual pesticides or fertilizers has expired, it will also be possible to provide useful information on authorization expiration to producers. .

  Furthermore, for each table, when registering or browsing data, each user is given a predetermined access right, and when registering or browsing data, registration or browsing is performed within the range of the access right. If this is possible, security can be ensured for information unique to each user. In addition, if the progress confirmation information showing the use plan in the use plan table and the accumulated result of the use result in the use result table is presented, the producer can follow the plan in the process of producing crops. It will be possible to check the progress status of whether or not it is progressing.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the use log | history management system of the agrochemical which concerns on basic embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the agricultural field area | region contrast table T1 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the tolerance | permissible_range table T2 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the use plan table T3 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the use performance table T4 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a block diagram which shows the specific structural example of the use plan data input / output part 130 in the system shown in FIG. It is a top view which shows an example of the input screen for inputting usage plan data with respect to the usage plan data input / output part 130 in the system shown in FIG. It is a top view which shows the state by which the warning screen was displayed by inputting each data shown in FIG. It is a top view which shows the state which input another data into the input screen shown in FIG. FIG. 10 is a plan view showing a state in which a registration completion screen is displayed by inputting each data shown in FIG. 9. It is a figure which shows the state which registered each data shown in FIG. 9 in the use plan table T3. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a state in which each data shown in FIG. 7 is registered in a use plan table T3 ignoring a warning. It is a block diagram which shows the specific structural example of the use performance data input / output part 140 in the system shown in FIG. It is a top view which shows an example of the input screen for inputting usage record data with respect to the usage record data input / output part 140 in the system shown in FIG. FIG. 15 is a plan view showing a state where a registration completion screen is displayed by inputting each data shown in FIG. 14. It is a figure which shows the state which registered each data shown in FIG. 14 in the use performance table T4. It is a top view which shows the state by which the warning screen was displayed by inputting usage record data. It is a top view which shows the state where the preliminary warning was displayed with the completion of registration by inputting usage record data. It is a top view which shows the state where the warning screen to the effect that it exceeded the range of the usage plan by inputting usage result data was displayed. It is a top view which shows the state in which the progress confirmation screen was displayed by the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the example which set the frequency | count of use for every agrochemical, the usage-amount / time, and the dilution magnification range as an allowable range. It is a top view which shows an example of the input screen for inputting use plan data for every pesticide. It is a top view which shows an example of the input screen for inputting use performance data for every pesticide. It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the utilization log | history management system of the agrochemical which concerns on the modification which uses an additional table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the active ingredient table T5 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the example which set the tolerance | permissible_range for every component of an agrochemical. It is a top view which shows an example of the input screen for inputting use performance data for every component of an agrochemical. It is a figure which shows the specific example of active ingredient table T5 'containing the content rate used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the example which sets the tolerance | permissible_range containing the usage-amount of each agrochemical component. It is a top view which shows an example of the input screen for inputting the usage record data containing the usage-amount of each agrochemical. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the harvest control table T6 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the use performance table T4 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the harvest regulation screen displayed by the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the authorization revocation table T7 used with the system shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the authorization revocation screen displayed by the system shown in FIG.

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be described based on the illustrated embodiments.

<<< §1. Configuration of basic embodiment >>
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a pesticide use history management system 500 according to a basic embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated, the usage history management system 500 includes a data input / output unit 100 shown in the upper part and a table storage part 200 shown in the lower part. The data input / output unit 100 is connected to the network 50 and can receive access from the terminal devices 10, 20, and 30 that are also connected to the network 50. Eventually, this usage history management system 500 is a system having a function of storing and managing information on the usage history of agricultural chemicals for agricultural products in response to access from the terminal devices 10 to 30.

  In the case of the illustrated embodiment, the network 50 is the Internet, and each of the terminal devices 10 to 30 is a personal computer equipped with a Web browser. For convenience of illustration, FIG. 1 shows a state in which three terminal devices 10 to 30 are connected. In practice, however, access to the data input / output unit 100 is made from a large number of terminal devices that can be connected to the Internet. Is possible. Of course, each terminal device does not necessarily have to be a personal computer, and any device such as a mobile phone or a tablet computer that has an environment connectable to the network 50 may be used.

  The usage history management system 500 according to the present invention is actually configured by a server device connected to the Internet, and each component shown in the block in the figure is hardware (computer) that constitutes the server device. (A main body, a storage device, etc.) and software (program) incorporated in the hardware.

  In the case of this embodiment, the data input / output unit 100 is constituted by a Web server, and can provide various information in the form of a Web screen to each terminal device 10-30 equipped with a Web browser. Moreover, the information which the user who operates each terminal device 10-30 input on the Web screen can be taken in as needed. Further, as will be described later, it has a function of determining whether or not the information input by the user is appropriate, and displaying a warning on the screen of each terminal device 10 to 30 if it is inappropriate. .

  On the other hand, in the case of this embodiment, the table storage unit 200 is configured by a database server, and plays a role of storing information that the data input / output unit 100 takes in from each of the terminal devices 10 to 30. As described above, the data input / output unit 100 provides the information stored in the table storage unit 200 to each terminal device 10-30 in the form of a Web page in response to a request from each terminal device 10-30. . In addition, since the information stored in the table storage unit 200 is information indicating a correspondence relationship between a plurality of data, in the present application, these pieces of information are referred to as various tables.

  In the case of the basic embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the table storage unit 200 includes a field region comparison table storage unit 210 that stores a field region comparison table T1, an allowable range table storage unit 220 that stores an allowable range table T2, and a usage plan table. The usage plan table storage unit 230 stores T3 and the usage result table storage unit 240 stores the usage result table T4. Further, the data input / output unit 100 is an allowable range data input / output that inputs / outputs data to / from the field region reference data input / output unit 110 that inputs / outputs data to / from the field region reference table storage unit 210. A usage plan data input / output unit 130 for inputting / outputting data to / from the usage plan table storage unit 230, and a usage result data input / output unit 140 for inputting / outputting data to / from the usage result table storage unit 240.

  In FIG. 1, a line is drawn between the field area reference data input / output unit 110 and the field area reference table storage unit 210, and between the allowable range data input / output unit 120 and the allowable range table storage unit 220. A line is drawn between the use plan data input / output unit 130 and the use plan table storage unit 230, and between the use result data input / output unit 140 and the use result table storage unit 240. The lines between these blocks indicate the main input / output paths of the data, and in fact, there is data input / output between the blocks where no lines are drawn. To do. For example, as will be described later, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 and the usage record data input / output unit 140 read out data from the field area reference table T1 and the allowable range table T2 and perform various determinations as necessary. have.

  Subsequently, the contents of the tables T1 to T4 stored in the table storage unit 200 and the data input / output to / from these tables will be described with specific examples.

<§1-1: Field area comparison table>
The field area comparison table T1 stored in the field area comparison table storage unit 210 is a table in which a field ID that identifies a field where the crop is cultivated and a region ID that identifies the area where the field is located are associated with each other. It is. FIG. 2 shows a specific example of the field area comparison table T1. In the case of the illustrated example, the field ID is configured by a user code and a field code. For example, the field ID in the first line is composed of a character string “A101”, where “A” is a user code and “101” is a field code.

  The user code is a code for identifying a user who uses the use history management system 500 (such as a crop producer), that is, a user who is accessing the use history management system 500 from a terminal device. This corresponds to an account for using this system. On the other hand, the field code is a code for identifying individual fields (fields) that produce crops. In the example shown here, serial codes are assigned to individual users so that the codes are unique to each other. They are numbered. Specifically, the farm number managed by user A is assigned a serial number in the 100s starting from 101, and the farm field managed by user B is assigned a serial number in the 200s starting from 201. The farm fields managed by the user C are assigned serial numbers in the 300s starting from the 301st.

  Thus, in the case of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the field codes themselves are unique to each other. Therefore, it is possible to omit the user code and use only the field code as the field ID. However, in this embodiment, the field code is composed of a character string such as “A101” by putting the user code at the head of the field code so that the user who manages each field is clear. ing. In this usage history management system 500, if the field ID is a unique ID, no problem occurs. Therefore, when the user code is used, the field code itself does not necessarily have to be a unique code. . For example, the field code of the fourth line in FIG. 2 is “201”, but even if this is “101”, the field ID of the first line is “A101” and the field ID of the fourth line is “B101”. Therefore, there is no practical problem.

  Of course, as the field ID, any symbol or number may be used as long as each user can identify an actual field and is unique to each other in the system. For example, the address and latitude / longitude of the field can be used as the field ID as it is.

  On the other hand, the area ID is an ID for identifying the area where each field is located. In the example shown in the figure, the prefecture names such as “Nagano prefecture”, “Yamanashi prefecture”, and “Gunma prefecture” are used as the area ID. ing. In this way, the region where each field is located is specified by the region ID because, as will be described later, there are many cases in which the use standards of agricultural chemicals for agricultural products differ depending on the individual region. Therefore, it is preferable that the “region” in the present invention is set so that the range in which the pesticide use standards are the same is one region. From this point of view, it would be common practice to set up one region for each administrative division, such as a prefecture unit or a municipal unit.

  Of course, even in the same prefecture, in cases where pesticide use standards differ in the north and south, for example, “Nagano Prefecture North” and “Nagano Prefecture South” are treated as different regions, and each region is different. What is necessary is just to attach ID. On the other hand, when the use standards of pesticides are the same in two adjacent prefectures, for example, “Niigata Prefecture & Toyama Prefecture” may be assigned one area ID to an area that is divided into two prefectures. Good. Here, for the sake of convenience, the following description will be given on the assumption that each region ID is set in units of prefectures as in the example shown in FIG.

  In response to a registration request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, the field region comparison data input / output unit 110 takes in data for configuring the field region comparison table T1 from the terminal device and stores this data in the field region comparison table storage unit. In response to the registration process to be written in 210 and the browsing request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, the data constituting the field region comparison table T1 is read from the field region comparison table storage unit 210 and provided to the terminal device. Processing (the processing on the system 500 side is “processing to be browsed” on the terminal device side, but in the present application, it is simply referred to as “viewing processing” for convenience).

  Here, for example, let us consider a case where a user A who has completed use registration with an account of user code A in order to use this system performs information registration in the field area comparison table T1. In this case, user information such as a user code related to the user A is stored in advance in the system 500 (the storage destination of the user information is not shown).

  When the user A accesses the system 500 with the account of the user code A using the terminal device 10 and makes a registration request to the field area comparison table T1, the field area comparison data input / output unit 110 displays the field area. Processing for displaying a registration Web page on the screen of the terminal device 10 is performed. User A wants to register on this Web page for the three fields that he manages, and the locations of these fields are “Nagano Prefecture”, “Nagano Prefecture”, and “Yamanashi Prefecture”, respectively. Is input, the field code “101”, “102”, “103” is automatically generated by the field area reference data input / output unit 110, and the first to third lines of the field area reference table T1 in FIG. A registration process for writing the data shown to the field area comparison table storage unit 210 is executed.

  Further, when the user A accesses the system 500 with the account of the user code A using the terminal device 10 and makes a browsing request for the field region comparison table T1, the field region comparison data input / output unit 110 is requested. The information is read from the field area comparison table storage unit 210, and this is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10 as information on the Web page. Therefore, the user A can browse the web page for confirming the farm field ID and the area ID at any time for each farm field he has registered.

  The example shown in FIG. 2 shows a state in which the user B and the user C have also performed the registration process. It should be noted that the registration process for the field area comparison table T1 is not necessarily performed by the individual users A, B, and C themselves. In actual operation, the field area comparison table T1 is managed by the system 500. It may be done by the administrator. For example, when using this system 500, each user A, B, C is asked to submit a use application, and this user application is filled with information about each user's field. When the operation is adopted, the system administrator can perform the registration process for the field area comparison table T1 on the basis of the description items of the use application form submitted by each user.

<§1-2: Allowable range table>
The permissible range table T2 stored in the permissible range table storage unit 220 associates the region ID with the permissible range (standard) related to the use of pesticides for individual crops in the region specified by the region ID. It is a table. FIG. 3 shows a specific example of the allowable range table T2. In the case of the illustrated example, the upper limit value of the total number of times the agricultural chemical is used is recorded as an allowable range. In this basic embodiment, for convenience of explanation, a simple example in which the upper limit value of the total use number of agricultural chemicals is set as an allowable range will be described, but in practice, as shown in a modification example described later. In addition, the usage amount for each agricultural chemical or the usage amount for each component can be set as an allowable range.

  In the specific example shown in FIG. 3, in the first row of the tolerance table T2, the total number of agricultural chemicals used is “within 30 times” for the crop “lettuce” in the region indicated by the region ID “Nagano Prefecture”. The standard (allowable range of 0 to 30 times) is recorded. Even in the same region, the allowable range differs for each crop. For example, in Nagano Prefecture, lettuce is “within 30 times”, tomato is “within 10 times”, and cucumber is “within 15 times”.

  Similarly, even for the same crop, there are cases where the allowable range varies from region to region. For example, even for the same “lettuce” standard, Nagano Prefecture is “within 30 times” and Yamanashi Prefecture is “within 20 times”. The reason why different standards are set for each region is that there are differences in climate, climate, pests, plagues, etc. depending on the region, and it is not reasonable to apply the same standard nationwide. Therefore, at present, each local government sets its own standards according to the circumstances. In addition, the specific numerical value of the allowable range illustrated in the embodiment of the present application is a convenient numerical value for explaining the invention, and does not indicate an actual pesticide use standard set by each local government.

  In addition, the “acceptable range” in the present invention may indicate an absolute use standard for agricultural chemicals stipulated in ordinances or the like, or may indicate a use standard for shipping with a product name such as “low agricultural chemical vegetables”. In some cases. In the former case, the use of pesticides exceeding the “acceptable range” is against the law, but in the latter case, even if the “acceptable range” is exceeded, the product cannot be shipped with a product name such as “low pesticide vegetables”. It is.

  In response to a registration request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, the allowable range data input / output unit 120 takes in data for configuring the allowable range table T <b> 2 from the terminal device and writes it into the allowable range table storage unit 220. In response to a browsing request from the terminal device 10 to 30, a registration process and a browsing process of reading the data constituting the allowable range table T 2 from the allowable range table storage unit 220 and providing it to the terminal device are performed. .

  Information registration in the allowable range table T2 can be performed by a user (a crop producer), but in practice, the administrator of the system 500 will perform it. The administrator registers the information necessary for constructing the tolerance table T2 in consideration of the agricultural chemical use standards for each agricultural product established by local governments, etc. for each region, and if necessary What is necessary is just to perform the work which corrects registration information suitably.

  For example, when the administrator Z uses the terminal device 30 to access the system 500 with an administrator account and makes a registration request to the allowable range table T2, the allowable range data input / output unit 120 causes the allowable range information registration. A process of displaying the Web page on the screen of the terminal device 30 is performed. When the administrator Z performs an operation of inputting data as shown in the allowable range table T2 of FIG. 3 on this Web page, the allowable range data input / output unit 120 stores these data in the allowable range table storage unit 220. The registration process to write to is executed.

  Further, when each user A to C or the administrator Z accesses the system 500 with each account using each terminal device and makes a browsing request for the allowable range table T2, the allowable range data input / output unit 120 The requested information is read from the allowable range table storage unit 220, and a browsing process is performed in which the requested information is displayed on the screen of each terminal device as information on the Web page. Thereby, the browsing person can confirm the content of tolerance range table T2 which is illustrated in FIG. 3 on the screen of a terminal device, for example.

<§1-3: Usage plan table>
The use plan table T3 stored in the use plan table storage unit 230 is a table in which the field ID is associated with the use plan of the pesticide for the crop grown in the field specified by the field ID. FIG. 4 shows a specific example of this use plan table T3. As described above, in the embodiment shown here, the field ID is configured by a user code and the field code. For example, the field ID in the first line is configured by a character string “A101”. The information on the first line indicates a plan for cultivating the crop “lettuce” in the field identified by the field ID “A101” and further using the pesticide for the field 25 times in total. . Similarly, the information on the second row indicates a plan for cultivating a crop “tomato” in the field identified by the field ID “A102” and further using the agricultural chemical eight times for the field. It is.

  As described above, in this basic embodiment, in order to describe a simple example in which the upper limit value of the total use number of pesticides is set as an allowable range, FIG. 4 also shows some pesticide regardless of the type and amount of pesticide. In this example, the number of times of use is counted as “one use”, and the total number of uses is counted as a use plan.

  In this embodiment, since the field ID field of the use plan table T3 is automatically input in cooperation with the field ID field of the field area control table T1, the use plan table shown in FIG. The field ID data of T3 is copied from the field ID of the field area control table T1 shown in FIG. In FIG. 4, fields where the fields of crops and usage plans are blank are fields where usage plans have not yet been registered by the user.

  In response to a registration request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 takes in data for configuring the usage plan table T 3 from the terminal device and writes it into the usage plan table storage unit 230. In response to the browsing request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, the registration processing and the browsing processing for reading the data constituting the usage plan table T3 from the usage plan table storage unit 230 and providing it to the terminal device are performed. .

  Information Z can be registered in the use plan table T3 by the administrator Z who has received a request from the user (a crop producer), but in general, the user himself who produces the crop It is more convenient to have registered. Here, a case where the user A performs registration work by himself will be described. First, the user A accesses the system 500 with the account of the user code A using the terminal device 10 and makes a registration request to the use plan table T3. Then, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 performs processing for displaying a usage plan registration Web page on the screen of the terminal device 10. When the user A inputs the total number of times of use of the crops and agricultural chemicals to be cultivated and the pesticides (use plan) for each field managed by the user A on the Web page, the use plan data input / output unit 130 inputs these information. Registration processing to be written in the use plan table storage unit 230 is executed.

  In the example of the use plan table T3 shown in FIG. 4, the user A performs the operation of registering the use plan for the farm field identified by the farm field IDs “A101” and “A102” in this way. Shows a state in which an operation for registering a use plan for the field identified by the field ID “A201” is performed. As described above, the use plan data input / output unit 130 has a function of reading data in the field ID column of the field region comparison table T1 and copying the data to the field ID column of the use plan table T3. For this reason, the use plans for the field IDs “A103”, “C301”, and “C302” are not registered, but the copied field ID is already written in the field ID column of the use plan table T3 shown in FIG. It is in the state.

  On the other hand, when the user A accesses the system 500 with the account of the user code A using the terminal device 10 and makes a browsing request for the usage plan table T3, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 receives the requested information. Is read from the use plan table storage unit 230, and a browsing process is performed to display this on the screen of the terminal device 10 as information on the Web page. Therefore, the user A can browse the web page for confirming the agricultural chemical use plan for each field registered by the user A at any time.

<§1-4: Usage record table>
The use record table T4 stored in the use record table storage unit 240 is a table in which the farm field ID is associated with the use record of the agricultural chemicals for the crops cultivated in the farm field specified by the farm field ID. FIG. 5 shows a specific example of this usage record table T4. In the embodiment shown here, the field ID is configured by a user code and a field code, and the field ID in the first line is configured by a character string “A101”. The information on the first line indicates a use record that “agricultural chemicals were used on August 10, 2010” in the field identified by the field ID “A101”. Similarly, the information on the second line indicates the usage record that “Agricultural chemicals were also used on August 12, 2010” in the same field identified by the field ID “A101”. This information indicates the usage record of “Agricultural chemicals used on August 12, 2010” in another field identified by the field ID “A102”.

  As described above, this basic embodiment is a simple example in which the upper limit value of the total use number of pesticides is set as an allowable range, so it is sufficient to simply register the use date of the pesticides as the actual usage. Practically, as shown in a modified example to be described later, the name of the agricultural chemical used, the amount used, and the like can be registered as the usage record.

  In response to a registration request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, the usage record data input / output unit 140 takes in data for configuring the usage record table T <b> 4 from the terminal device and writes it into the use record table storage unit 240. In response to a browsing request from the terminal devices 10 to 30, a registration process and a browsing process of reading data constituting the usage record table T4 from the use record table storage unit 240 and providing it to the terminal device are performed. .

  Registration of information in the usage record table T4 can be performed by the administrator Z who has received a request from the user (a crop producer), but in general, the user himself who produces the crop It is more convenient to have registered. Here, a case where the user A performs registration work by himself will be described. First, the user A accesses the system 500 with the account of the user code A using the terminal device 10 and makes a registration request to the usage record table T4. Then, the usage record data input / output unit 140 performs processing for displaying a usage record registration Web page on the screen of the terminal device 10. When user A specifies the field managed by himself / herself on this Web page and inputs the use date (practice record) of the pesticide for the field, the use record data input / output unit 140 causes the use A registration process for writing the results to the use result table storage unit 240 is executed.

  The example of the usage record table T4 shown in FIG. 5 shows a state in which the user A has performed an operation of registering the usage record for the field identified by the field IDs “A101” and “A102”. ing.

  On the other hand, when the user A accesses the system 500 with the account of the user code A using the terminal device 10 and makes a browsing request for the usage record table T4, the usage record data input / output unit 140 receives the requested information. Is read from the usage record table storage unit 240, and a browsing process is performed to display this on the screen of the terminal device 10 as information on the Web page. Therefore, the user A can browse the web page for confirming the past usage record that he / she has registered at any time.

<§1-5: Features of Usage History Management System 500>
As described so far, the table storage unit 200 in the use history management system 500 shown in FIG. 1 includes the field area comparison table T1 in which the field ID is associated with the area ID that identifies the area where the field is located. , An allowable range table T2 that records the allowable range related to the use of pesticides for each individual crop, a field ID that identifies the field where the crop is cultivated, and a pesticide for the crop that is cultivated in the field specified by the field ID The usage plan table T3 that associates the usage plan, the field ID, and the usage record table T4 that associates the use record of the pesticides with respect to the crops grown in the field identified by the field ID are stored. Will be. Here, in the tolerance range table T2, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the region ID is associated with the tolerance range regarding the use of pesticides for individual crops in the region identified by the region ID. .

  On the other hand, in response to a registration request from each terminal device 10-30, the data input / output unit 100 takes in data for configuring each table T1 to T4 from the terminal device and writes it to each table T1 to T4 And according to the browsing request from each terminal device 10-30, it has a function which performs the browsing process which reads predetermined data from each table T1-T4, and provides this to the said terminal device.

  An important feature of the usage history management system 500 is that the registration target is within the range of the usage standard defined in the allowable range table T2 when the data input / output unit 100 registers the agricultural chemical use plan and usage results. It is a point to check whether or not, and if it exceeds the range, it has a function of warning. That is, the data input / output unit 100 refers to the allowable range table T2 when performing registration processing for writing data to the usage plan table T3 or the usage record table T4 in response to a registration request from the terminal devices 10 to 30. To determine whether the usage plan or usage record to be written is within the set allowable range, and if a negative determination is made, the terminal device that made the registration request Warning. For this reason, users (agricultural producers) can receive warnings when attempting to register usage plans and usage results that exceed the range of use standards, and are useful for use within the appropriate use standards. Information can be obtained.

  In particular, in the case of the basic embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the data input / output unit 100 receives data from the use plan table T3 or the use result table T4 in response to a registration request including a specific field ID from the terminal device. When the registration process for writing is performed, by referring to the field area comparison table T1, the specific area ID corresponding to the specific field ID is recognized, and by referring to the allowable range table T2, It is determined whether or not the usage plan or the actual usage is within a specific allowable range associated with the specific area ID, and when a negative determination is made, the terminal device that made the registration request It has a function to give a warning.

  Therefore, even when local governments and others set their own standards for the use of pesticides, by preparing the field region comparison table T1 that associates information for specifying each region for each field, the affiliation of each field The area to be registered can be identified, and a warning can be given when the usage plan or usage record to be registered exceeds a specific allowable range uniquely set for the area. That is, even when an original standard is set for each region, it is possible to flexibly cope with it.

  The process of determining whether or not the usage plan is within the allowable range is performed by the usage plan data input / output unit 130, and the process of determining whether or not the usage record is within the allowable range is This is performed by the result data input / output unit 140. Therefore, hereinafter, a specific configuration example of the usage plan data input / output unit 130 will be described in §2, and a specific configuration example of the usage record data input / output unit 140 will be described in §3.

<<< §2. Specific Configuration of Usage Plan Data Input / Output Unit 130 >>
FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a specific configuration example of the use plan data input / output unit 130 in the system shown in FIG. In the case of this example, the use plan data input / output unit 130 includes a use plan area specifying unit 131, a use plan allowable range specifying unit 132, a use plan determining unit 133, a use plan, as indicated by the dashed line in the figure. The warning unit 134, the usage plan registration unit 135, and the usage plan browsing processing unit 136 are configured. However, as described in §1, each of these components is actually configured by incorporating a dedicated program into a computer.

  As already described, in response to a registration request from the terminal device, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 takes in data for configuring the usage plan table T3 from the terminal device, and uses this data in the usage plan table storage unit 230. A function of performing a registration process for writing to the terminal device and a browsing process for reading data constituting the usage plan table T3 from the usage plan table storage unit 230 and providing the data to the terminal device in response to a browsing request from the terminal device. Have.

  First, the operation of each component when a registration request is given from the terminal device 10 will be described. Here, as a specific example, when the registration state in the use plan table T3 is the state shown in FIG. 4, the user A uses the use plan related to the farm field specified by the blank farm field ID “A103”. Let's consider the case of registering. In this case, the user A accesses the system 500 from the terminal device 10 as a terminal device for use plan registration and makes a registration request for the use plan.

  In response to this registration request, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 performs processing for taking in information to be registered (hereinafter referred to as usage plan registration target 15) from the terminal device 10. As shown in FIG. 6, the use plan registration target 15 includes a specific field ID, information indicating a specific crop associated with the specific field ID, a specific use plan for the specific crop, It is included. Here, specifically, the user A cultivates the crop “lettuce” for the field identified by the field ID “A103”, and develops a plan in which the total number of times the agricultural chemical is used (use plan) is “25”. It shall be. In this case, the use plan registration target 15 including information of the field ID “A103”, the crop “lettuce”, and the use plan “25” is taken from the terminal device 10 into the use plan data input / output unit 130.

  FIG. 6 does not show an interface unit for performing communication and data exchange with the terminal device 10, but actually, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 displays a usage plan registration Web page. A function of transmitting data in the “.html” format to the terminal device 10 and an interface unit for capturing data input on the Web page are provided. Therefore, the process in which the user A inputs the use plan registration object 15 from the terminal device 10 and takes it into the use plan data input / output unit 130 is performed by the function of the interface unit (such as Since the function of the user interface using the Web page is a general-purpose publicly known technique, a detailed description is omitted here.

  FIG. 7 is a plan view showing an example of an input screen for inputting usage plan data to the usage plan data input / output unit 130. When the user A accesses the system 500 from the terminal device 10 and makes a registration request for the usage plan, a usage plan data input window W1 as shown in FIG. 7 is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10. It will be. User A may use this input window W1 to perform work for inputting necessary information. In FIG. 7, the user A inputs the characters “A” in the user code column, “103” in the field code column, “lettuce” in the crop column, and “25” in the total use count column. The state is illustrated.

  When the user inputs data in each field of the input window W1 and clicks the “Register” button, the “A” in the user code field and the field code field “103” are captured as the field ID “A103”. The “lettuce” in the crop column is captured as information indicating the crop, and the “25” in the total use count column is captured as information indicating the use plan. If the user A has already entered the user code “A” as an account when accessing the system 500, the input of the user code “A” in the input window W1 is omitted. be able to.

  Here, for convenience of explanation, an example is shown in which characters are entered in each input field by using a keyboard or the like. However, as input candidates for the field code field, the user code “A” is specified. 2 in the field area comparison table T1 shown in FIG. 2 (in the example shown, the field codes corresponding to the user code “A” are “101”, “102”, “103”. In any case, for practical use, it is preferable to display selection candidates on the screen and allow the user to select one by a click operation or the like. The same applies to the crop field, and it is preferable to display the expected crop candidates on the screen and allow the user to select and input.

  The field ID, the crop, and the usage plan information thus captured from the terminal device 10 are provided to the usage plan area specifying unit 131, the usage plan allowable range specifying unit 132, and the usage plan determining unit 133, respectively. Processing is executed.

  First, the use plan area specific | specification part 131 accesses the agricultural field area | region contrast table storage part 210, and reads the specific area ID corresponding to the given specific agricultural field ID by referring the agricultural field area | region contrast table T1. Do. For example, when the field ID “A103” is given, the corresponding area ID “Yamanashi Prefecture” is read out by referring to the field area comparison table T1 shown in FIG. The area ID is delivered to the use plan allowable range specifying unit 132.

  On the other hand, the use plan permissible range specifying unit 132 accesses the permissible range table storage unit 220 and refers to the permissible range table T2, thereby using the use plan region specifying unit for a specific crop taken as the use plan registration target 15. A process of reading a specific allowable range corresponding to the specific area ID handed over from 131 is performed. In the case of the above example, the specific crop to be registered is “lettuce”, and the specific area ID delivered is “Yamanashi Prefecture”. Therefore, if the allowable range table T2 shown in FIG. The allowable range “20” is read out. The permissible range is handed over to the use plan determination unit 133.

  Then, the use plan determination unit 133 determines whether or not the specific use plan taken in as the use plan registration target 15 is within the range of the specific allowable range delivered from the use plan allowable range specifying unit 132. . In the case of the above example, the specific usage plan fetched as the usage plan registration target 15 is “25”, whereas the specific allowable range delivered from the usage plan allowable range specifying unit 132 is “20”. Therefore, the usage plan of “total number of pesticide use 25 times” that user A intends to register is the tolerance set for the crop (lettuce) in the region (Yamanashi Prefecture) (total number of pesticide use 20 times) Negative) is out of range.

  When the use plan determining unit 133 makes a negative determination, the use plan warning unit 134 warns the use plan registration terminal device 10 that the use plan registration target 15 is outside the allowable range. I do. In the case of the above example, since a negative determination is made, a warning message that the usage plan to be registered is outside the allowable range is transmitted as a result report to the terminal device 10.

  FIG. 8 is a plan view showing a state in which a warning screen is displayed by inputting each data shown in FIG. In other words, in this example, the usage plan warning unit 134 displays the usage plan warning window W2 on the screen of the terminal device 10, and issues a warning that the content input in the input window W1 is outside the allowable range. In the case of the illustrated example, the message “Allowable range is within 20 times!” Is presented, and it is also communicated to the user that the numerical value (upper limit number) indicating the boundary of the allowable range is 20. Further, in this embodiment, the total use number field of the input window W1 is displayed in color (shown by hatching in the figure), and it is clearly indicated that the problematic input field is the total use number field.

  User A who has received such a result report will make a new registration request after changing the plan. Specifically, the user clicks the “OK” button in the warning window W2 to delete the window W2, and then changes the value in the total use number column of the input window W1. Here, consider a case where user A changes the total number of uses to “20”, which is the upper limit, and makes a registration request again. FIG. 9 is a plan view showing a state in which such a change has been made. When the “Register” button is clicked in this state, the corrected information is again taken in as information indicating the use plan. This time, since the total number of uses is corrected to “20”, the use plan determination unit 133 makes a positive determination.

  When the use plan determination unit 133 makes a positive determination, the use plan registration unit 135 performs registration processing to write the use plan registration target in the use plan table storage unit 230 (use plan table T3), and completes the registration. A result report to that effect is transmitted to the terminal device 10. FIG. 10 is a plan view showing a state where a use plan registration completion window W3 for performing such a result report is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10, and FIG. 11 shows a use plan table T3 after completion of registration. It is a figure which shows the state of. The newly registered information is stored in the third line which is blank.

  Thus, when the user performs the registration work for the usage plan, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 automatically determines whether or not the usage plan is within the preset allowable range, and the allowable range. If it is outside, a warning will be given. Thus, the user can make a plan within a preset allowable range.

  On the other hand, when a browsing request is given from the terminal device 10, the browsing request is processed by the usage plan browsing processing unit 136. That is, the usage plan browsing processing unit 136 reads part or all of the data constituting the usage plan table T3 from the usage plan table storage unit 230 in response to a browsing request from the terminal device 10, and this is read out from the terminal device 10 Browsing process to be sent and provided as a result report. Specifically, the usage plan browsing processing unit 136 creates a data file in “.html” format for displaying a usage plan browsing Web page based on the data read from the usage plan table storage unit 230. This is transmitted to the terminal device 10.

  For example, when a browsing request is made for all data constituting the usage plan table T3, the usage plan table T3 as shown in FIG. 11 is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10. If there is some problem with another user's usage plan being viewed by another user, all data browsing of the usage plan table T3 is allowed only by the administrator, For the browsing request from the user, only browsing of data including the user code of the user may be permitted.

  The example illustrated in FIG. 6 is an example in which the use plan registration unit 135 performs an operation of registering in the use plan table T3 only when the use plan determination unit 133 makes a positive determination. When the unit 133 makes a negative determination, a warning is issued from the use plan warning unit 134, and registration is rejected. Such strict operation is effective in a case where it is required to strictly observe the allowable range recorded in the allowable range table T2. For example, the allowable range shown in the allowable range table T2 of FIG. 3 is a statutory standard that should be strictly observed when shipping as agricultural products, and the usage mode of agricultural chemicals exceeding the allowable range is illegal. Then, such a strict operation can be adopted.

  However, practically, the allowable range shown in the allowable range table T2 is not necessarily limited to a legal standard to be strictly observed as an agricultural product. For example, there is a case where the allowable range shown in the allowable range table T2 indicates a use standard for shipping with a product name such as “low agricultural chemical vegetable”. In such a case, even if the “acceptable range” is exceeded, it is not possible to ship with a product name such as “low agricultural chemical vegetables”, and it is not illegal to ship as agricultural products. Therefore, some producers dare to set a usage plan that exceeds the “allowable range”.

  In order to be able to flexibly cope with such a case, the use plan warning unit 134 issues a warning, but the same use plan registration object is re-applied from the terminal device 10 for use plan registration. When a registration request is made, the usage plan registration unit 135 may perform a registration process for writing the usage plan registration target into the usage plan table storage unit 230. Specifically, when a registration request is made again for the same usage plan registration target, the usage plan determination unit 133 makes a negative determination again. When the negative determination is made again, the use plan registration unit 135 may perform a process of registering the registration target in the use plan table T3.

  Specifically, in the example shown in FIG. 8, the user A deletes the warning window W2 by clicking the “OK” button, and then again corrects the data in the input fields of the input window W1 without any modification. When the operation of clicking the “Register” button is performed, the usage plan with the total usage count “25” is registered as it is in the usage plan table T3. In this case, the usage plan warning unit 134 may display a warning indicating that registration has been performed, although it exceeds the allowable range.

  It should be noted that it is preferable that the information on the registered use plan that is out of the permissible range is displayed so as to call attention during browsing. For example, the display examples of the usage plan table T3 shown in FIG. 11 are examples in which usage plans within the allowable range are registered. However, as shown in the above example, the usage plan table T3 is outside the allowable range of the total usage count “25”. When the usage plan is registered in the usage plan table T3, at the time of browsing, for example, as shown in FIG. 12, the portion of the usage plan that exceeds the allowable range is colored (indicated by hatching in the figure). And call attention.

<<< §3. Specific configuration of usage record data input / output unit 140 >>
FIG. 13 is a block diagram showing a specific configuration example of the usage record data input / output unit 140 in the system shown in FIG. In the case of this example, the usage record data input / output unit 140 is, as shown in the figure surrounded by a one-dot chain line, a usage record area specifying unit 141, a use record allowable range specifying unit 142, a use record determining unit 143, and a use record. A warning unit 144, a usage record registration unit 145, and a usage record browsing processing unit 146 are included. However, as described in §1, each of these components is actually configured by incorporating a dedicated program into a computer.

  As described above, the usage record data input / output unit 140 takes in data for configuring the usage record table T4 from the terminal device in response to a registration request from the terminal device, and uses this data as the usage record table storage unit 240. In response to a browsing request from the terminal device, the data constituting the usage record table T4 is read from the usage record table storage unit 240 and provided to the terminal device. Have.

  First, the operation of each component when a registration request is given from the terminal device 10 will be described. Here, as a specific example, when the registration state in the use record table T4 is the state shown in FIG. 5, the user A registers the new use record related to the field identified by the field ID “A101”. Consider the case of doing. In this case, the user A accesses the system 500 from the terminal device 10 as the terminal device for use record registration, and makes a registration request for the use record.

  In response to this registration request, the usage record data input / output unit 140 performs processing for taking in information to be registered (hereinafter referred to as a usage record registration target 16) from the terminal device 10. As shown in FIG. 13, the use record registration target 16 includes a predetermined field ID and a predetermined use record associated with the predetermined field ID. Here, the use record “Usage date of August 15, 2010” is used for the field specified by the field ID “A101” by the user A (the use record indicating that the pesticide was used once on August 15, 2010). Shall be registered. In this case, the usage record registration target 16 including the information of the farm field ID “A101” and the usage record “August 15, 2010” is taken from the terminal device 10 into the use record data input / output unit 140.

  Although an interface unit for performing communication and data exchange with the terminal device 10 is not shown in FIG. 13, in practice, the usage record data input / output unit 140 displays a Web page for use record registration. A function of transmitting data in the “.html” format to the terminal device 10 and an interface unit for capturing data input on the Web page are provided. Therefore, the process in which the user A inputs the usage record registration target 16 from the terminal device 10 and takes it into the usage record data input / output unit 140 is performed by the function of this interface unit (as described above, Since the function of the user interface using the Web page is a general-purpose publicly known technique, a detailed description is omitted here.

  FIG. 14 is a plan view showing an example of an input screen for inputting usage record data to the usage record data input / output unit 140. When the user A accesses the system 500 from the terminal device 10 and makes a registration request for the usage record, a usage record data input window W4 as shown in FIG. 14 is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10. It will be. User A may use this input window W4 to input necessary information. FIG. 14 shows a state in which the characters “A”, “101” in the field code column, and “2010/8/15” in the agricultural chemical use column are input by user A's input operation. Illustrated.

  When the user inputs data in each field of the input window W4 and clicks the “Register” button, the “A” in the user code field and the field code field “101” are captured as the field ID “A101”. “2010/8/15” in the agrochemical use column is incorporated as information indicating the use record (information indicating that the pesticide was used once on August 15, 2010). Note that if the user A has already entered the user code “A” as an account when accessing the system 500, the input of the user code “A” in the input window W4 is omitted. be able to.

  In addition, input candidates in the field code field can be recognized by referring to the field area comparison table T1 shown in FIG. 2 when the user code “A” is specified. It is preferable to make the user select one of them by a click operation or the like. Also, if the current date is automatically entered by default in the agrochemical use column, the labor of inputting work can be saved.

  When the field ID and the usage record information are thus fetched from the terminal device 10, the field ID is sent to the use record area specifying unit 141, the use record allowable range specifying unit 142, and the use record determining unit 143 as shown in FIG. 13. The usage record is given to the usage record determination unit 143. Since the usage results input from the terminal device 10 are sequentially accumulated in the usage result table T4, the usage results newly input from the terminal device 10 are referred to as “usage results (current ) ", And the use results accumulated in the use result table T4 so far will be referred to as" use results (past) "for distinction.

  The use result area specifying unit 141 performs a process of reading a predetermined area ID corresponding to a given predetermined field ID by accessing the field area comparison table storage unit 210 and referring to the field area comparison table T1. For example, when the field ID “A101” is given, the corresponding area ID “Nagano Prefecture” is read out by referring to the field area comparison table T1 shown in FIG. The area ID is delivered to the use result allowable range specifying unit 142.

  On the other hand, the use result allowable range specifying unit 142 first accesses the use plan table storage unit 230 and refers to the use plan table T3 to specify a predetermined crop corresponding to a given predetermined field ID. For example, when the field ID “A101” is given, referring to the use plan table T3 shown in FIG. 4, the corresponding crop “lettuce” is read and specified as a predetermined crop. Subsequently, the use result allowable range specifying unit 142 accesses the allowable range table storage unit 220 and refers to the allowable range table T2, thereby determining a predetermined value for the predetermined crop corresponding to the given predetermined region ID. Processing to read the allowable range is performed. In the case of the above example, the permissible range for “lettuce” corresponding to “Nagano Prefecture” is read out. Therefore, referring to the permissible range table T2 shown in FIG. 3, the corresponding permissible range “total number of uses: within 30 times” Will be read out. The permissible range is delivered to the usage record determination unit 143.

  Then, the usage record determination unit 143 determines that a given usage record (current) or a cumulative record obtained by accumulating the use record (present) in the use record (past) stored in the use record table T4 is a predetermined allowable range. It is determined whether it is within the range. That is, if the actual use (current) itself is outside the allowable range, it is possible to determine that the actual use is out of the allowable range without referring to the actual use (past). Otherwise, the usage record determination unit 143 reads the usage record (past) from the use record table T4, performs a process of calculating a cumulative record obtained by accumulating the use record (present), and the cumulative record is a predetermined allowable value. It is determined whether it is within the range.

  In the case of the above example, the usage record (current) taken in as the usage record registration target 16 is information on the date “2010/8/15”, but this date information is “Agricultural chemicals on August 15, 2010. "Used once" shows the usage record of "used once", so in comparison with the allowable range for "total number of pesticide use", the usage record (current) is information that means "one time" Yes. Therefore, the actual use (current) is within the allowable range. Also, assuming that the contents of the usage record table T4 at this time are as shown in FIG. 5, the use record (current) in the use record (past) related to the field ID “A101” read from the use record table T4. ) Will be “3 times”. Therefore, the cumulative performance is also within the allowable range.

  When the usage record determination unit 143 makes a positive determination, the usage record registration unit 145 performs a registration process of writing the usage record registration target in the use record table storage unit 240 (use record table T4), and completes the registration. A result report to that effect is transmitted to the terminal device 10. FIG. 15 is a plan view showing a state where a usage record registration completion window W5 for performing such a result report is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10, and FIG. 16 shows a usage record table T4 after registration completion. It is a figure which shows the state of. The newly registered information is stored in the fourth line which is blank.

  As described above, as long as the use record determination unit 143 makes a positive determination, the use record registration unit 145 sequentially registers the use record registration target in the use record table T4. When a negative determination is made, the usage record warning unit 144 issues a warning to the usage record registration terminal device 10 that the use record registration target 16 is outside the allowable range. For example, if the agricultural field has been used 30 times for the field identified by the field ID “A101”, the usage record (usage date) for the field ID “A101” is 30 times in the usage record table T4. It is in a state that has been registered over. In this state, if an attempt is made to register the 31st use record for the field ID “A101”, the accumulated record is 31 times, and the use record determination unit 143 makes a negative determination. In this case, the usage result warning unit 144 issues a warning.

  FIG. 17 shows a state where a warning screen is displayed by inputting the field ID “A101” and the use of agricultural chemical “2010/11/28” (when using the 31st agricultural chemical) in the usage record data input window W4. It is a top view. In other words, in this example, the usage history warning unit 144 displays the usage history warning window W6 on the screen of the terminal device 10, and gives a warning that the content input in the input window W4 is out of the allowable range. In the case of the example in the figure, the message “It is the 31st use! The allowable range is within 30 times” is presented, and the number of pesticide use including the current usage results will be the 31st, and the allowable range The user is notified that the numerical value indicating the boundary (upper limit number) is 30 times.

  The user A who has received such a result report recognizes that if an agricultural chemical is used on the field identified by the field ID “A101” on November 28, 2010, the allowable range is exceeded. be able to. Therefore, as a method of using this system 500, if the operation of pre-registering the use of the pesticide as the actual use is performed immediately before performing the work of actually spraying the pesticide on the field, Since it is possible to receive warnings, it is possible to prevent the use of agricultural chemicals exceeding the permissible range if the application of agricultural chemicals is stopped when the warning is received. In the case of the above example, the user only has to click the “OK” button in the warning window W6 to delete the window W6, and then cancel the use record registration through the input window W4.

  Thus, when the user performs the registration work for the use record, the use record data input / output unit 140 automatically determines whether the accumulated record including the use record is within a preset allowable range. If it is determined and it is out of the allowable range, a warning is given. Therefore, the user can stop the use of agricultural chemicals exceeding the allowable range in advance.

  On the other hand, when a browsing request is given from the terminal device 10, the browsing request is processed by the usage record browsing processing unit 146. That is, the usage record browsing processing unit 146 reads out part or all of the data constituting the usage record table T4 from the use record table storage unit 240 in response to a browsing request from the terminal apparatus 10, and this is read out from the terminal apparatus 10 Browsing process to be sent and provided as a result report. Specifically, the usage record browsing processing unit 146 creates a data file in the “.html” format for displaying a Web page for browsing the use record based on the data read from the use record table storage unit 240. This is transmitted to the terminal device 10.

  For example, when a browsing request is made for data registered by the user A as of August 15, 2010, a usage record table T4 as shown in FIG. 16 is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10. It will be. Similarly to the browsing of the usage plan table T3, when there is a problem when the usage record of another user is browsed by another user, all data browsing of the usage record table T4 is performed by the administrator. It is sufficient that only browsing of data including its own user code is permitted for browsing requests from individual users.

  The example shown in FIG. 13 is an example in which the use record registration unit 145 performs an operation of registering in the use record table T4 only when the use record determination unit 143 makes a positive determination. When the unit 143 makes a negative determination, a warning is given from the usage record warning unit 144, and registration is rejected. Such strict operation is effective in cases where it is required to strictly observe the tolerances recorded in the tolerance table T2, but the tolerances are shipped under product names such as “low pesticide vegetables”. In cases where the standard of use is shown, there may be cases where the use of agricultural chemicals exceeding the “acceptable range” is carried out with the abandonment of shipment under the product name such as “low agricultural chemical vegetables”.

  In order to be able to flexibly cope with such a case, the same usage record registration target is re-applied from the terminal unit 10 for use record registration even though the use record warning unit 144 has issued a warning. When a registration request is made, the usage record registration unit 145 may perform a registration process for writing the usage record registration target in the usage record table storage unit 240. Specifically, when a registration request is made again for the same usage record registration target, the usage record determination unit 143 makes a negative determination again. If a negative determination is made again, the usage record registration unit 145 may perform a process of registering the registration target in the usage record table T4.

  Specifically, in the example shown in FIG. 17, the user A deletes the warning window W6 by clicking the “OK” button, and then again corrects the data in the input fields of the input window W4 without any modification. When the operation of clicking the “Register” button is performed, the usage record indicating that the 31st agricultural chemical use was performed on November 28, 2010 is directly registered in the usage record table T4. In this case, the usage record warning unit 144 may display a warning indicating that registration has been performed, although the allowable range is exceeded.

<<< §4. Modification to basic embodiment >>
Subsequently, in this §4, some modifications to the basic embodiment described in §1 to §3 will be described.

<§4-1: Modified example for performing preliminary warning>
In the basic embodiment described above, when the accumulated request is out of the allowable range when the user makes a registration request for the use record, the use record warning unit 144 performs, for example, the use record shown in FIG. An explanation has been given that a warning such as the warning window W6 is issued. Such a warning is useful when the user takes an operation of pre-registering the use record of the pesticide spraying before performing the work of actually spraying the pesticide on the field. If, after actually carrying out the work of spraying the pesticide, the post-registration of the usage record for the spraying of the pesticide is no longer meaningful as a warning.

  That is, when the operation of post-registering the usage record is adopted, even if the usage record warning window W6 of FIG. 17 is displayed, the user A already has 31 for the field specified by the field ID “A101”. Since the use of the pesticide has been performed for the first time, the 31st pesticide use record cannot be canceled even if such a warning is displayed.

  Therefore, when an operation of post-registering the usage record is taken, a preliminary warning may be given when the boundary of the allowable range is approached. In other words, the usage record determination unit 143 makes an affirmative determination and issues a proximity warning when the cumulative record is within the allowable range but is close to the boundary of the range. When the warning unit 144 issues this proximity warning, it may be configured to give a preliminary warning to the usage record registration terminal device that it is close to the boundary of the allowable range.

  FIG. 18 is a plan view showing a state in which a preliminary warning is displayed when registration is completed by inputting usage record data. In this example, the user A enters the field ID “A101” and “2010/11/26” (when the 28th agricultural chemical is used) into the usage record data input window W4 and clicks the “Register” button. By clicking, a state where the use record registration completion and the preliminary warning window W7 are displayed is shown.

  In the case of this example, the usage record to be registered corresponds to the 28th pesticide use, so the cumulative record is “28” times, which is below the upper limit “30” of the allowable range. Accordingly, the use result determination unit 143 makes an affirmative determination, but issues a proximity warning because it is close to the boundary of the allowable range (for example, “the upper limit value of the allowable range is −2 times”). Then you can decide to issue a proximity warning). Therefore, the usage record warning unit 144 receives this proximity warning and, as shown in the figure, reports that the registration has been completed successfully, and “to the allowable range, there are two more times.” A preliminary warning will be made.

  At a later date, when user A registers the usage record indicating that the 29th pesticide use has been performed for this field, a preliminary warning display “This is one more time until the permissible range.” Will be made. Furthermore, when the usage record indicating that the 30th pesticide use has been registered, a preliminary warning message “To the permissible range, there are 0 more times” is displayed. It can be recognized that pesticides can no longer be used in the field.

  In this way, when registering the usage record, if the proximity is close to the boundary of the allowable range even if the allowable range is not exceeded, the producer can accept the case by adopting an embodiment in which a preliminary warning is given. It is possible to recognize that the boundary of the range is approached, and it can be reflected in the subsequent schedule. Note that when performing a preliminary warning, if the display is performed using different colors according to the degree of proximity to the upper limit value of the allowable range, the degree of proximity can be intuitively recognized.

<§4-2: Modified example in which warning of plan inconsistency>
As described above, in the present invention, when using an agrochemical, a use plan is first prepared and registered in the use plan table T3, and the actual use is registered in the use result table T4 when actually using the pesticide. It will be. In any case, at the time of registration, it is determined whether the registration target is within the allowable range. If it is determined that the registration target is outside the allowable range, a warning is presented.

  The modification described here adds a function of presenting a warning to the user even when the usage record does not match the usage plan. That is, in the configuration shown in FIG. 13, the usage record determination unit 143 further checks whether or not the cumulative record matches the use plan by referring to the use plan table T3, and does not match the use plan. An unplanned warning is issued, and when this unplanned warning is issued, the usage result warning unit 144 warns the terminal device for usage record registration that it does not match the usage plan. Should be done.

  For example, consider a case where a usage plan as shown in the usage plan table T3 of FIG. In this case, for the farm field ID “A101”, a pesticide use plan of “25 times” for lettuce is drawn up. Here, since the field identified by the field ID “A101” is the field of “Nagano Prefecture” as shown in the field region control table T1 of FIG. 2, according to the tolerance table T2 of FIG. The upper limit of the total number of pesticides used for lettuce in Nagano Prefecture is “30 times”, and “25 times” in the usage plan is below the upper limit “30 times”. Therefore, when the user intends to register the use result of the 26th use of agricultural chemicals, the system according to the basic embodiment described so far does not issue a warning.

  In the case of the modification described here, for example, as shown in FIG. 19, in the usage record data input window W4, the user A uses the track record “2010/11/20” for the field ID “A101” (November 2010). On the 20th, if you are trying to register the results of use of pesticides) and the use results are the 26th use of pesticides, an unplanned warning window W8 will be displayed as shown in the figure. Is beyond the scope of the usage plan. " As a result, the user A can recognize that the usage record is within the allowable range but deviates from the usage plan that the user A has planned in the past, and can reflect it in the subsequent schedule. it can.

  If such a plan mismatch warning is presented as mere reference information, even if the use result warning unit 144 displays the unplanned warning window W8, the use result registration unit 145 converts the use result as usual. The operation registered in the table T4 may be taken. On the other hand, in the case of plan mismatch, in the case of taking an operation for reconfirming the user, after clicking the “OK” button in the unplanned warning window W8, the “Register” button in the usage result data input window W4 is again displayed. Only when it is clicked, the use record may be registered in the use record table T4.

<§4-3: Modified example in which determination is made even when a plan is revised>
Generally, a period of several months is required from planting to harvesting of crops, and the weather and climate conditions change every year. Therefore, in practice, the contents of the usage plan table T3 should be corrected as necessary. It is preferable to be able to. When the usage plan is corrected in this way, if the same determination as that at the time of registration is performed, the user can receive a warning even if the corrected plan is out of the allowable range.

  That is, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 has a function of accepting a correction request for correcting the contents of the usage plan table T3 already stored in the usage plan table storage unit 230 from the terminal device. If there is, the content of the usage plan table T3 may be corrected. Specifically, in the configuration shown in FIG. 6, the use plan determination unit 133 determines whether the corrected use plan is within the allowable range when correction based on the correction request is performed. The use plan registration unit 135 may perform correction based on the correction request on the use plan table storage unit 230 when the use plan determination unit 133 makes a positive determination regarding the correction request.

  On the other hand, when the use plan determination unit 133 makes a negative determination regarding the correction request, the use plan warning unit 134 determines that the content of the correction request is out of the allowable range with respect to the terminal device that has made the correction request. A warning to the effect may be made. Of course, when the same correction request is made again despite the above warning, the usage plan registration unit 135 performs correction based on the correction request to the usage plan table storage unit 230. A flexible response may be taken.

  In addition, operations such as agricultural cooperatives and other personnel who check and understand in advance the use plan of agricultural chemicals formulated by individual producers, and make plans from harvesting to shipment according to the use plan. If a pesticide is taken, it may be difficult to correct the use plan of the pesticide along the way. In particular, if a modification that makes the conditions looser than the originally planned conditions for the use of agricultural chemicals is made in the middle, there are many cases in which inconveniences such as agricultural cooperatives cannot ship as originally planned. To deal with such a case, once a usage plan that has been registered is to be corrected only when it is a correction that moves away from the boundary of the allowable range (a correction that becomes an inner ring), it is registered first. Only plan changes that impose conditions that are more stringent than the usage plan that has been made are permitted, and the act of the producer relaxing the condition from the middle can be suppressed.

  Specifically, the use plan data input / output unit 130 has a function of accepting a correction request for correcting the contents of the use plan table T3 already stored in the use plan table storage unit 230 from the terminal device. When there is a correction request, the use plan determination unit 133 determines whether or not the correction based on the correction request is a correction that moves away from the range boundary of the allowable range, and makes a positive determination. In such a case, the usage plan registration unit 135 may perform correction based on the correction request for the usage plan table storage unit 230. On the other hand, when the use plan determination unit 133 makes a negative determination regarding the correction request, the use plan warning unit 134 issues a warning that the correction request is rejected to the terminal device that has made the correction request. You just have to do it.

<§4-4: Modification for presenting progress>
In the usage history management system according to the present invention, the planned usage plan is registered in the usage plan table T3, and the actual usage record is registered in the usage record table T4. Therefore, the user (producer) can check the current progress by comparing the use plan in the use plan table T3 with the accumulated result of the use results in the use result table T4.

  Therefore, in the configuration shown in FIG. 1, it is possible to make a progress confirmation request from each of the terminal devices 10 to 30 to the system 500. The terminal unit displays progress confirmation information indicating that the output unit 130 and the usage record data input / output unit 140 cooperate with each other to compare the usage plan in the usage plan table T3 with the cumulative result of the usage record in the usage record table T4. It is convenient to provide the functions provided in More specifically, the user makes a progress confirmation request designating a specific field, and the usage plan browsing processing unit 136 shown in FIG. 6 and the usage result browsing processing unit 146 shown in FIG. The usage plan related to the designated field and the accumulated result of the usage record may be compared and presented on the screen of the terminal device of the user.

  FIG. 20 is a plan view showing an example of the progress confirmation screen presented in this way. In the illustrated example, when the user A makes a progress confirmation request from the terminal device 10 to the system 500, a progress confirmation window W9 is displayed on the screen of the terminal device 10, and the user code “ In the example, the progress status is displayed in the lower part of the window W9 by inputting “A” and the field code “101”. As for the progress, the total number of use “25 times” is registered as a pesticide use plan for the field specified by the field ID “A101”, and the cumulative use result of the pesticide at the present time is “15 times”. It shows that.

  In the bottom row, a bar indicating the ratio of the current cumulative usage record to the usage plan is displayed. The horizontal width of the display frame of the bar is a dimension corresponding to the usage plan, that is, “25 times”, and the length of the bar is a dimension corresponding to the current cumulative usage record, that is, “15 times”. Using this progress confirmation screen, the user (producer) can grasp the state of pesticide use related to the field, and in the process of producing crops, the progress status of whether or not pesticide use is proceeding as planned. Can be confirmed.

<§4-5: Modified example for restricting access>
As shown in FIG. 1, a usage history management system 500 according to the present invention can be accessed from a large number of terminal devices 10 to 30 via a network (Internet) 50. It is preferable that a predetermined access right is given to each of them, and that data can be registered and browsed within the range of the access right when registering or browsing data.

  Specifically, in the configuration shown in FIG. 1, an account and a password are given to each user, and this account and password may be requested at the time of access. That is, when each data input / output unit 110-140 receives access from the terminal device 10-30, it recognizes the user of the terminal device by the account and password registered in advance, Data registration and viewing may be permitted within the range of access rights set in advance.

  For example, for general users (individual producers), set access rights that allow access only to information about fields that include their user codes, and for managers (for example, agricultural cooperative staff) It is possible to operate in such a manner that an access right for permitting access to all information is set. Alternatively, in order to ensure traceability, it is possible to operate the browsing so that it can be freely accessed not only by producers but also by distributors and general consumers.

<<< §5. Variations on acceptable range >>>
Subsequently, here, some modified examples of the allowable range will be described. In the basic embodiments described so far, for convenience, the simple example in which the upper limit value of the total number of times of use of the agricultural chemical is set as the allowable range has been described. However, in practice, it is possible to set a finer allowable range than just the allowable range related to the total number of times the pesticide is used.

  For example, FIG. 21 is a diagram illustrating an example in which the number of uses, the amount used / time, and the dilution rate range for each agricultural chemical are set as the allowable range. In other words, for the pesticide S, the upper limit value “3 times”, the upper limit value “2 liters / 10 are”, and the allowable range of the dilution rate range “15-20 times” when sprayed. For pesticide T, the upper limit of the number of times of use is “10 times”, the upper limit of the amount of use for each time is “100 liters / 10 are”, and the range of dilution ratios during spraying is “1000 to 2000 times” The upper limit value “10 times” for the number of uses, the upper limit value “200 liter / 10 are” for each use amount, and the range of the dilution rate at the time of spraying “ An allowable range of “1000 to 2000 times” is set. Regarding the usage amount, an upper limit value of “cumulative usage amount” may be set instead of the upper limit value of “use amount / time”.

  Therefore, when this modification is implemented, the individual contents in the tolerance range column of the tolerance range table T2 shown in FIG. 3 are replaced with the contents shown in FIG. For example, in the example of FIG. 3, information “total number of use: within 30 times” is set as an allowable range for “lettuce” of “Nagano Prefecture”, but instead of the information, as shown in FIG. Information will be set. After all, in the field where “lettuce” is produced in “Nagano Prefecture”, the upper limit of the total number of use of pesticides is 23 times, using pesticide S 3 times, pesticide T 10 times and pesticide U 10 times. become.

  As described above, when a fine tolerance is set for each agricultural chemical, it is necessary to register detailed information for each agricultural chemical in the same manner for the usage plan and the actual usage. FIG. 22 is a plan view showing an example of an input screen for inputting usage plan data for each agricultural chemical. That is, in the case of this modification, the usage plan data input / output unit 130 displays a usage plan data input window W10 as shown in the figure on the screen of the terminal device, and the user A enters each column of this window W10. By entering the necessary items, the usage plan is registered.

  In the case of the illustrated example, the field ID “A103” is specified by the user code “A” and the field code “103”, and the crop “lettuce” produced in the field is specified. First, as the usage plan of “Agricultural Chemicals S”, information on the number of times of use “2”, the amount of use / time “1.5” liter / 10 ares, and the dilution factor “20” times is input. If the “Register” button is clicked here, these pieces of information are registered as a usage plan. Of course, it is determined whether or not the usage plan is within the allowable range shown in FIG. 21, and if there is information outside the range, a warning to that effect is given. If necessary, the usage plans for “Agricultural Chemicals T” and “Agricultural Chemicals U” are registered in the same manner.

  On the other hand, FIG. 23 is a plan view showing an example of an input screen for inputting usage record data for each agricultural chemical. That is, in the case of this modification, the usage record data input / output unit 140 displays a usage record data input window W11 as shown in the figure on the screen of the terminal device, and the user A enters each column of this window W11. By entering the necessary items, the usage record will be registered.

  In the case of the illustrated example, the farm field ID “A101” is specified by the user code “A” and the farm field code “101”, “Agricultural Chemical S” is added to the date “2010/8/15”, and “1.5” liter. Results information indicating that the product is used at a dilution factor of “20” by an amount of / 10 are. Here, if the “Register” button is clicked, these pieces of information are registered as usage records. Of course, it is determined whether or not the use record or the accumulated record including the use record is within the allowable range shown in FIG. 21, and if there is information outside the range, a warning to that effect is given. Is made. If necessary, the use results of “Pesticide T” and “Pesticide U” are registered in the same manner.

  Eventually, in the case of the usage history management system according to the basic embodiment described in §1, the allowable range table T2 becomes a table including the upper limit value of the total number of times the agricultural chemical is used for each crop as the allowable range. The plan table T3 becomes a table including the planned value of the total number of times of use of the pesticide for each crop as the use plan, and the use result table T4 has used the pesticide for each field as the use result. It becomes a table containing the day. And the use plan determination part 133 determines whether the plan value of the total use frequency of an agrochemical is below the upper limit of the total use frequency, and the use results determination part 143 is the total use frequency of an agrochemical. It is determined whether or not the number is less than the upper limit value. On the other hand, in the case of the modification described here, the number of uses for each agricultural chemical, the amount used for each agricultural chemical, and the dilution rate for each agricultural chemical are set as the allowable range. Specifically, it is as follows.

  First, when setting the number of times of use for each agricultural chemical, the allowable range table T2 becomes a table including the upper limit value of the number of times of use of each agricultural chemical as the allowable range, and the usage plan table T3 is As a use plan, it becomes a table containing the planned value of each use number of each pesticide for each crop, and the use result table T4 has used each individual pesticide for each field as a use result. The table contains the date. Then, the use plan determining unit 133 determines whether or not the planned number of uses is equal to or less than the upper limit of the number of uses for each individual pesticide, and the use result determining unit 143 is used for each individual pesticide. It is determined whether or not the cumulative number of uses is less than or equal to the upper limit of the number of uses.

  Moreover, when setting the usage-amount for every pesticide, tolerance | permissible_range table T2 contains the upper limit of each usage-amount (usage / time or cumulative usage) of each pesticide about each crop as a tolerance | permissible_range. It becomes a table, and the usage plan table T3 becomes a table including the planned values of the respective usage amounts of the individual pesticides as the usage plans, and the usage results table T4 becomes the usage results for the individual fields. For each pesticide, a table containing the amount used at the time of individual use. Then, the use plan determination unit 133 determines whether or not the planned amount of use is less than or equal to the upper limit of the use amount for each individual pesticide, and the use result determination unit 143 determines each of the individual pesticides. It is determined whether or not the usage amount or the cumulative usage amount is less than or equal to the upper limit value of the usage amount.

  Furthermore, when setting the dilution rate for each agricultural chemical, the allowable range table T2 is a table including the allowable range of the dilution rate at the time of use of each of the individual agricultural chemicals as the allowable range. T3 becomes a table including the planned values of the dilution ratio at the time of use of each individual pesticide for each crop as the use plan, and the use result table T4 shows the individual pesticide for each field as the use result. The table contains the dilution factor for each use. Then, the use plan determination unit 133 determines whether or not the plan value of the dilution rate is within the allowable range of the dilution rate for each individual pesticide, and the use result determination unit 134 determines each of the individual pesticides. Therefore, it is determined whether or not the dilution factor at the time of use is within the allowable range of the dilution factor.

<<< §6. Variant with additional table >>>
In the basic embodiment shown in FIG. 1, as shown in the figure, four tables are used: a field area contrast table T1, an allowable range table T2, a use plan table T3, and a use result table T4. Here, a modified example in which additional tables are added will be described.

  FIG. 24 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a pesticide use history management system 500 ′ according to a modification using this additional table. A system 500 ′ according to this modification is obtained by adding some additional components to the system 500 shown in FIG.

  That is, the data input / output unit 100 ′ includes various data input / output units (the field area reference data input / output unit 110, the allowable range data input / output unit 120, the use plan data input / output unit 130, the usage result data input / output unit shown in FIG. In addition, an effective component data input / output unit 150, a harvest regulation data input / output unit 160, and an authorization revocation data input / output unit 170 are added to the unit 140).

  In addition, the table storage unit 200 ′ further includes various table storage units (the field area comparison table storage unit 210, the allowable range table storage unit 220, the use plan table storage unit 230, and the use result table storage unit 240 shown in FIG. 1). An effective component table storage unit 250 for storing the effective component table T5, a harvest control table storage unit 260 for storing the harvest control table T6, and an authorization revocation table storage unit 270 for storing the authorization revocation table T7 are added. It is a thing. Hereinafter, functions of these newly added components will be described in order.

<§6-1: Active ingredient table>
The active ingredient table storage unit 250 is a component that stores an active ingredient table T5 indicating active ingredients contained in individual pesticides. The active ingredient data input / output unit 150 receives registration requests from the terminal devices 10 to 30. In response to the registration process for reading the data for configuring the active ingredient table T5 from the terminal device and writing it into the active component table storage unit 250, and the browsing request from the terminal devices 10-30, the active ingredient It is a component that performs a browsing process of reading data constituting the table T5 from the active ingredient table storage unit 250 and providing it to the terminal device.

  FIG. 25 shows a specific example of the effective component table T5. This example shows active ingredients for four types of pesticides S, T, U, and V. For pesticides S, components X and Y, for pesticides T, component Z, for pesticides U, component X, and pesticides V For X, components X and Y are registered as effective components. Such an active ingredient table T5 may be registered by the system administrator and updated as needed. If such an active ingredient table T5 is prepared, it is possible to set an allowable range for restricting the number of uses for each active ingredient of the agricultural chemical.

  For example, the allowable range table T2 is a table including the upper limit value of the number of times of use of each active ingredient for each crop as the allowable range, and the use plan table T3 is an individual for each crop as the use plan. A table including the planned values of the number of times each active ingredient is used, and the usage record table T4 includes a table containing the dates of use of each of the individual pesticides for each field as a use record. By doing so, the usage plan determination unit 133 can determine whether or not the planned number of times of use is equal to or less than the upper limit value of the number of times of use for each of the effective components, The unit 143 refers to the active ingredient table T5 to calculate the cumulative number of times of use for each of the active ingredients. Product number of uses it is possible to determine whether it is not more than the upper limit number of uses.

  FIG. 26 is a diagram illustrating an example in which an allowable range is set for each agrochemical component. In this example, the upper limit of the number of times of use of the pesticide containing the component X is 3, the upper limit of the number of times of use of the pesticide containing the component Y is 4, and the upper limit of the number of uses of the pesticide containing the component Z is 10 times. An acceptable range is set. Accordingly, the use plan also registers the number of uses for each of the components X, Y, and Z, and the use plan determination unit 133 sets the upper limit of the number of uses for each effective component. If the value is less than or equal to the value, a positive determination is made.

  FIG. 27 is a plan view illustrating an example of an input screen for inputting usage record data for each agricultural chemical. In the case of this example, the usage record data input / output unit 140 displays a usage record data input window W12 as shown in the figure on the screen of the terminal device, and the user A is required for each column of the window W12. By inputting, the usage record is registered. In the illustrated example, the field ID “A101” is identified by the user code “A” and the field code “101”, and the record information indicating that “Agricultural Chemical S” is used on the date “2010/8/15” is displayed. Have been entered. Here, if the “Register” button is clicked, these pieces of information are registered as usage records.

  At this time, the usage record determination unit 143 refers to the effective component table T5 to calculate the cumulative use count for each of the effective components. That is, since the usage record determination unit 143 can recognize that the pesticide S has been used this time based on the input information of the window W12 illustrated in FIG. 27, by referring to the active ingredient table T5 illustrated in FIG. It can be recognized that the active ingredients X and Y have been used this time. Similarly, the active ingredient can be recognized from the used agricultural chemicals in the past use record registered in the use record table T4. Therefore, it is possible to calculate the cumulative number of times used to date for each active ingredient. Therefore, it is possible to determine whether or not the calculated cumulative number of times of use for each active ingredient is equal to or less than the upper limit of the number of times of use shown in FIG.

  FIG. 28 shows an example of another active ingredient table T5 ′. This active ingredient table T5 ′ is obtained by adding a content rate to the active ingredient table T5 shown in FIG. That is, it is a table showing active ingredients contained in individual agricultural chemicals and their contents. If an active ingredient table T5 ′ including such a content rate is prepared in the active ingredient table storage unit 250, it is possible to set an allowable range for regulating the amount of use of each agricultural chemical active ingredient.

  For example, the allowable range table T2 is a table including the upper limit value of the amount of use (cumulative usage amount) of each active ingredient for each crop as the allowable range, and the usage plan table T3 is the usage plan. For each crop, a table including the planned values of the amount of each active ingredient is used, and the use result table T4 is used as an actual result for each field, for each individual pesticide, and for each individual use. If the table includes the usage amount, the usage plan determination unit 133 determines whether or not the planned usage amount is less than or equal to the upper limit value of the usage amount for each active ingredient. The usage record determination unit 143 calculates the cumulative usage amount for each active ingredient by referring to the active ingredient table T5. And the calculated cumulative consumption was that it is possible to determine whether it is not more than the upper limit of the amount used.

  FIG. 29 is a diagram illustrating an example in which an allowable range of cumulative usage is set for each agrochemical component. In this example, the upper limit of the amount of pesticide containing component X is 1000 g / 10 are, the upper limit of the amount of pesticide containing component Y is 1000 g / 10 are, and the upper limit of the amount of pesticide containing component Z is An allowable range of 2000 g / 10 are set. Accordingly, the usage plan also registers the usage amount for each of the components X, Y, and Z, and the usage plan determination unit 133 sets the usage amount plan value to the upper limit of the usage amount for all active ingredients. If the value is less than or equal to the value, a positive determination is made.

  FIG. 30 is a plan view illustrating an example of an input screen for inputting usage record data indicating the usage amount for each agricultural chemical. In the case of this example, the usage record data input / output unit 140 displays a usage record data input window W13 as shown in the figure on the screen of the terminal device, and the user A is required for each column of the window W13. By inputting, the usage record is registered. In the case of the illustrated example, the field ID “A101” is specified by the user code “A” and the field code “101”, and “Agricultural Chemical S” is set to “0.5” liter / day on the date “2010/8/15”. Results information indicating that only 10 ares have been used. Here, if the “Register” button is clicked, these pieces of information are registered as usage records.

  At this time, the usage record determination unit 143 refers to the effective component table T5 to calculate the cumulative usage amount for each effective component. That is, the usage record determination unit 143 can recognize that the agricultural chemical S has been used only “0.5” liter / 10 ares this time based on the input information in the window W13 shown in FIG. By referring to the effective component table T5 ′, it can be recognized that only 25 g / 10 are effective component X and 25 g / 10 are effective component Y are used this time. Similarly, with respect to past use records registered in the use record table T4, it is possible to recognize the used active ingredients and their use amounts from the used pesticides and their use amounts. Therefore, the cumulative usage amount up to the present time can be calculated for each active ingredient. Therefore, it is possible to determine whether or not the calculated cumulative usage amount for each active ingredient is equal to or less than the upper limit value of the usage amount shown in FIG.

<§6-2: Harvest regulation table>
The harvest regulation table storage unit 260 is a component that stores a harvest regulation table T6 indicating a harvest regulation period for regulating the harvesting of crops after the use of the agrochemical for each individual pesticide. The harvest regulation data input / output unit 160 In response to a registration request from the terminal device 10-30, a registration process for fetching data for configuring the harvesting regulation table T6 from the terminal device and writing it in the harvesting regulation table storage unit 260, and the terminal devices 10-30 In response to a browsing request from, the data constituting the harvesting regulation table T6 is read from the harvesting regulation table storage unit 260, and a browsing process for providing the data to the terminal device is performed.

  FIG. 31 shows a specific example of the harvest regulation table T6. This example shows the harvest control period for four types of pesticides S, T, U, and V: 3 days for pesticide S, 7 days for pesticide T, 0 days for pesticide U, and pesticide V 3 days are registered as harvest control periods. Such a harvesting regulation table T6 may be registered by the system administrator and updated as needed.

  In general, pesticides remain in crops at the beginning of spraying, but they change chemically as time passes and eventually disappear. Therefore, if the crop is harvested and shipped immediately after the application of the pesticide, the consumer will not be able to obtain the crop with the pesticide remaining. Since this residual period varies from pesticide to pesticide, as shown in the example shown in FIG. 31, a harvest control period is set for each pesticide. After the use of the pesticide, crops are harvested until the harvest control period elapses. Can't do it. When a harvesting regulation table T6 as shown in FIG. 31 is prepared, useful information such as harvest regulation time can be provided to the producer.

  In order to provide such information on the harvest regulation time, the use result table T4 is a table including the date of use of each individual pesticide for each field as the use result. The usage record warning unit 144 refers to the use record table T4 and the harvest regulation table T6 to calculate the harvest regulation time for the crops to be cultivated in the individual fields, and presents this to the terminal device. You can do it.

  For example, as shown in FIG. 32, when the usage record “Pesticide S use: August 10, 2010” is registered for the field ID “A101” in the use record table T4, the use record warning unit 144 By referring to the harvest regulation table T6 shown in FIG. 31, it is possible to know that the harvest regulation period for the pesticide S is 3 days. Therefore, the field ID “A101” is specified based on the use record. It can be recognized that the crop produced in the field cannot be harvested until August 13, 2010. Therefore, the usage record warning unit 144 displays a harvest regulation notification window W14 as shown in FIG. 33 on the screen of the terminal device used by the user A for access to inform the user A of the harvest regulation period. can do.

  Such notification of the harvest regulation period can be performed at an arbitrary time when access from the user A is performed. For example, when the user A enters an account and a password and starts to access the system 500 ′, the use result warning unit 144 confirms the presence / absence of harvest regulation information including the user code A, If there is information to be notified, at that time, the harvest regulation notification window W14 as shown in FIG. 33 may be displayed on the login screen. Alternatively, such notification may be performed when the user A makes a registration request for registering the usage record. It is also possible to notify the harvesting regulation information using another means such as an e-mail.

<§6-3: Authorization revocation table>
The authorization revocation table storage unit 270 is a component that stores an authorization revocation table T7 indicating that the use authorization for each pesticide has expired, and the authorization revocation data input / output unit 170 is received from the terminal devices 10 to 30. In response to the registration request, the registration processing for fetching data for configuring the authorization revocation table T7 from the terminal device and writing it into the authorization revocation table storage unit 270, and the browsing request from the terminal devices 10 to 30 The component that performs the browsing process of reading the data constituting the authorization revocation table T7 from the authorization revocation table storage unit 270 and providing it to the terminal device.

  FIG. 34 shows a specific example of the authorization revocation table T7. This example shows a record of authorization revocation for four types of pesticides S, T, U, and V. It is registered that the authorization for pesticide T has expired on September 30, 2010. Authorization for other pesticides will still be effective. Authorization for use of pesticides is made by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and individual local governments and published in the official gazette. Therefore, the authorization revocation table T7 must be registered by the system administrator and updated as needed. Can do. By preparing such an authorization revocation table T7, it is possible to provide useful information on the authorization revocation to the producer.

  Specifically, first, the use plan determination unit 133 refers to the authorization revocation table T7 and determines that the use plan for the agricultural chemicals whose use authorization has expired is always outside the allowable range. The use record determination unit 143 may refer to the authorization revocation table T7 to determine that the use record for the agricultural chemicals whose use authorization has expired is always outside the allowable range. Then, the user (producer) may recognize that the use of the pesticide is out of the acceptable range at the time of attempting to register the use plan and actual use of the pesticide whose license has expired. it can.

  Practically, the usage plan warning unit 134 or the usage result warning unit 144 displays, for example, an authorization revocation notification window W15 as shown in FIG. 35 on the screen of the user's terminal device, and the authorization has expired. It is preferable to notify the correct date.

  In addition, such notification of authorization revocation is performed not only when the user makes a registration request for a usage plan or a registration request for a usage record, but also at any time when access from the user is performed. be able to. For example, for one week from the date of expiration, when an access from the user is started, it is possible to always display an authorization expiration notification window W15 as shown in FIG. 35 on the login screen. It is.

  In addition, if the system 500 ′ has a function that can recognize the user of the terminal device from the account and password information when receiving access from the terminal device, the revocation necessary for the accessing user is provided. It is also possible to notify only information.

  In this case, when the usage plan data input / output unit 130 performs a registration process for registering the usage plan in the usage plan table T3, information for identifying the user who registered the usage plan is also registered. When the usage plan data input / output unit 130 and the usage result data input / output unit 140 receive access from the terminal device, the usage plan table T3 and the authorization revocation table T7 are referred to, and Investigate whether or not the registered use plan includes the use plan of the expired pesticide. If it is included, warning information indicating that the relevant pesticide has expired is sent to the terminal device. It should be presented in

  Alternatively, when a new revocation record is registered, the use plan table T3 is referred to, and a user who has made a use plan for the expired pesticide is notified of revocation information using means such as e-mail. You can also encourage the revision of the plan.

<<< §7. Other variations >>
Finally, some further modifications will be described.

(1) Variations in the format of each table In the embodiments described so far, various tables are stored and used in the table storage units 200 and 200 '. The table is not limited to the format of the embodiment, and any format table may be used as long as the correspondence relationship between a plurality of data is recorded.

  In particular, in the embodiments described so far, for convenience of explaining individual functions, an example in which seven tables T1 to T7 are prepared separately and independently has been shown. However, these tables can be merged with each other. is there. For example, the active ingredient table T5 shown in FIG. 25, the harvest regulation table T6 shown in FIG. 31, and the authorization revocation table T7 shown in FIG. 34 can be merged into one table. In addition, the table storage units 210 to 270 for storing each table can be practically configured by a single hard disk device or the like incorporated in the server device, and in fact, seven independent components. There is no need to divide it.

(2) Variation of Data Input Method In the embodiments described so far, as an example of a method for a user to input each data to the data input / output unit 100, an example of inputting data from a keyboard or the like into an input field of various input windows. Of course, the method of inputting data to the data input / output unit 100 is not limited to such a method, and various other methods can be employed. Therefore, it is not always necessary to use a personal computer equipped with a keyboard and a mouse as the terminal device, and various electronic devices can be used as the terminal device.

  For example, as a means to perform the input function of the terminal device, a form for writing consisting of a bundle of paper, a digital pen with a function of reading two-dimensional position information, and filling in the form from the position information read from this digital pen A recognition device for recognizing the position and the contents of the entry, and the information entered on the form by the user using the digital pen is taken in as digital data, and this is input to the data input / output unit 100 via the network 50. It is also possible to adopt a configuration for transmitting.

(3) Use of agricultural products for sales promotion In the use history management system according to the present invention, the use plan and use results of agricultural chemicals are managed as history in the form of use plan table T3 and use result table T4. It is also possible to use these history information as sales promotion information for agricultural products. For example, if you publish usage plans and usage results on a web page, as an advertisement to the general consumer that the crops produced by a specific producer are cultivated with low or no pesticides Can be used. Alternatively, if such public information is displayed as electronic POP information at a supermarket sales floor or the like, a sales promotion effect at the store can be obtained. In addition, it is possible to promote sales by distributing such information in the form of an e-mail to distributors and general consumers.

(4) Application to fertilizer The embodiments described so far are all pesticide use history management systems, which are systems for storing and managing information on pesticide use histories for crops. However, the technical idea of the present invention is also applicable to a fertilizer usage history management system that stores and manages information related to the use history of fertilizers for agricultural products. That is, by replacing “agricultural chemicals” in the embodiments described so far with “fertilizer”, these embodiments can be used as a fertilizer usage history management system. Of course, it is also possible to configure an agrochemical fertilizer usage history management system that handles both agricultural chemicals and fertilizers simultaneously.

10: Terminal device 15: Usage plan registration target 16: Usage result registration target 20: Terminal device 30: Terminal device 50: Network (Internet)
100, 100 ': Data input / output unit 110: Field area reference data input / output unit 120: Allowable range data input / output unit 130: Use plan data input / output unit 131: Use plan area specifying unit 132: Use plan allowable range specifying unit 133 : Use plan determination unit 134: use plan warning unit 135: use plan registration unit 136: use plan browsing processing unit 140: use result data input / output unit 141: use result region specifying unit 142: use result allowable range specifying unit 143: use Result determination unit 144: Use result warning unit 145: Use result registration unit 146: Use result browsing processing unit 150: Effective ingredient data input / output unit 160: Harvest regulation data input / output unit 170: Authorization revocation data input / output unit 200, 200 ′ : Table storage unit 210: Field area comparison table storage unit 220: Allowable range table storage unit 230: Use plan table storage 240: Use result table storage unit 250: Effective ingredient table storage unit 260: Harvest regulation table storage unit 270: Authorization revocation table storage unit 500, 500 ': Usage history management system T1: Field area reference table T2: Allowable range table T3: Use plan table T4: Use result table T5: Effective ingredient table T5 ′: Effective ingredient table T6: Harvest restriction table T7: Authorization revocation table W1: Use plan data input window W2: Use plan warning window W3: Use plan registration completion window W4 : Use result data input window W5: use result registration completion window W6: use result warning window W7: use result registration completion and preliminary warning window W8: unplanned warning window W9: progress confirmation window W10: use plan data input window W1 : Use the actual data input window W12: use actual data input window W13: use actual data input window W14: harvest regulations notification window W15: approval revoked the notification window

Claims (17)

A system for storing and managing information related to the use history of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for crops according to access from terminal devices,
A field area control table storage unit for storing a field area control table in which a field ID for specifying a field where the crop is cultivated and a field ID for specifying a region where the field is located are associated with each other;
An allowable range table storage unit that stores an allowable range table in which an area ID is associated with an allowable range related to the use of agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for individual crops in the area specified by the area ID;
A use plan table storage unit for storing a use plan table in which a field ID and a use plan of an agrochemical or a fertilizer for a crop cultivated in a field specified by the field ID are associated with each other;
A usage record table storage unit for storing a use record table in which a field ID and a use record of an agrochemical or a fertilizer for a crop cultivated in the field specified by the field ID are associated with each other;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the field area comparison table is fetched from the terminal apparatus, and this is written into the field area comparison table storage unit and a browsing request from the terminal apparatus. In response, the field area control data input / output unit for reading the data configuring the field area control table from the field area control table storage unit and providing the data to the terminal device,
In response to a registration request from a terminal device, data for configuring the allowable range table is fetched from the terminal device and written in the allowable range table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device An allowable range data input / output unit that reads data constituting the allowable range table from the allowable range table storage unit and provides the data to the terminal device;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the use plan table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the use plan table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device A usage plan data input / output unit that reads the data constituting the usage plan table from the usage plan table storage unit and provides the data to the terminal device;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, data for configuring the usage record table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the usage record table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device A usage record data input / output unit that reads the data constituting the use record table from the use record table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device; and
With
The usage plan data input / output unit is
A specific field ID, information indicating a specific crop associated with the specific field ID, and a specific use plan for the specific crop are registered as use plan registration targets from the terminal device for use plan registration. A use plan area specifying unit that reads a specific area ID corresponding to the specific field ID by referring to the field area comparison table when given,
A use plan allowable range specifying unit that reads out a specific allowable range for the specific crop corresponding to the specific area ID by referring to the allowable range table;
A use plan determination unit that determines whether or not the specific use plan is within the specific allowable range;
When the use plan determination unit makes a positive determination, a use plan registration unit that performs a registration process of writing the use plan registration target in the use plan table storage unit;
A use plan warning unit that gives a warning to the terminal device for use plan registration that the use plan registration target is out of an allowable range when the use plan determination unit makes a negative determination; ,
In response to a browsing request from a terminal device, a usage plan browsing processing unit that reads a part or all of the data constituting the usage plan table from the usage plan table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device. When,
Have
The usage record data input / output unit is
When a predetermined field ID and a predetermined use result associated with the predetermined field ID are given as a use result registration target from the use result registration terminal device, the field field comparison table is referred to. Thus, a use result area specifying unit that reads a predetermined area ID corresponding to the predetermined field ID,
A predetermined crop corresponding to the predetermined field ID is identified by referring to the use plan table, and a predetermined about the predetermined crop corresponding to the predetermined area ID is referred to by referring to the allowable range table. The usage results tolerance range identifying part that reads the tolerance range of
A usage record determination unit for determining whether or not a cumulative record obtained by accumulating the predetermined use record in the predetermined use record or a past use record is within the predetermined allowable range;
A usage record registration unit that performs a registration process of writing the usage record registration target in the use record table storage unit when the use record determination unit makes a positive determination;
A usage record warning unit that gives a warning that the usage record registration target is out of an allowable range with respect to the use record registration terminal device when the use record determination unit makes a negative determination; ,
In response to a browsing request from a terminal device, a part or all of the data constituting the usage record table is read from the use record table storage unit, and a use record browsing processing unit that performs a browsing process for providing this to the terminal device When,
Have
The use plan data input / output unit has a function of accepting a correction request for correcting the contents of the use plan table already stored in the use plan table storage unit from the terminal device,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the correction based on the correction request is a correction away from the range boundary of the allowable range,
The usage plan registration unit, when the usage plan determination unit makes an affirmative determination on the correction request, performs a correction based on the correction request to the usage plan table storage unit,
The usage plan warning unit warns the terminal device that has made the correction request that the correction request is rejected when the usage plan determination unit makes a negative determination regarding the correction request. A pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system characterized by that. In the usage history management system according to claim 1 ,
If the registration request is issued again for the same usage plan registration object from the usage plan registration terminal device even though the usage plan warning unit has issued the warning, the usage plan registration unit A use history management system for pesticides or fertilizers, which performs a registration process for writing a registration target in a use plan table storage unit. In the usage history management system according to claim 1 or 2 ,
Even if the usage record warning unit gives a warning, when a registration request is made again for the same use record registration target from the terminal unit for use record registration, the use record registration unit A pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system, which performs a registration process for writing a registration target into a usage record table storage unit. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 3 ,
The usage record determination unit makes an affirmative determination and issues a proximity warning when the accumulated record is within the allowable range but close to the boundary of the range,
When the proximity warning is issued, the usage record warning unit gives a preliminary warning to the terminal unit for usage record registration that it is close to the boundary of the allowable range. Pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 4 ,
The usage record judgment unit checks whether the cumulative record matches the use plan by referring to the use plan table, and if it does not match the use plan, issues an unplanned warning,
Usage history of agrochemicals or fertilizers, characterized in that when the unforeseen warning is issued, the usage record warning unit warns the terminal unit for usage record registration that it does not match the usage plan. Management system. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
The tolerance table is a table including the upper limit value of the total number of times the agricultural chemical or fertilizer is used for each crop as the tolerance range,
The use plan table is a table including the plan value of the total number of times the agricultural chemical or fertilizer is used for each crop as the use plan.
The usage record table is a table that includes the date of use of pesticides or fertilizers for individual fields as usage records.
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the plan value of the total use count is equal to or less than the upper limit value of the total use count,
A use history management system for pesticides or fertilizers, characterized in that a use record determination unit determines whether or not the cumulative number of uses of pesticides or fertilizers is less than or equal to the upper limit of the total number of uses. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
The tolerance table is a table including the upper limit of the number of times of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each crop as the tolerance,
The use plan table is a table including the plan values of the number of times of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each crop as a use plan,
The use result table is a table including the date of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as a use result,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned value of the number of times of use is less than or equal to the upper limit of the number of times of use for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer,
A use history management system for a pesticide or fertilizer, characterized in that a use record determination unit determines whether or not the cumulative use count is equal to or less than the upper limit of the use count for each individual pesticide or fertilizer. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
The tolerance range table is a table including the upper limit value of each agricultural chemical or fertilizer for each crop as the tolerance range,
The usage plan table is a table including the planned values of the usage amounts of individual agricultural chemicals or fertilizers for each crop as the usage plan.
The use result table is a table including the use amount at the time of individual use for each agricultural field or fertilizer for each field, as the use result.
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the plan value of the use amount is less than or equal to the upper limit value of the use amount for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer,
Use of pesticides or fertilizers, characterized in that the usage record determination unit determines whether each usage or cumulative usage is less than or equal to the upper limit of the usage for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer History management system. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
The tolerance range table is a table including the tolerance range of the dilution rate at the time of use of each agricultural chemical or fertilizer for each crop as the tolerance range,
The use plan table is a table including the plan value of the dilution rate at the time of use of each agricultural chemical or fertilizer for each crop as a use plan,
The use result table is a table including the dilution rate at the time of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as the use result,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned value of the dilution factor is within the allowable range of the dilution factor for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer,
Usage history management system for pesticides or fertilizers, characterized in that the use results judgment unit judges whether or not the dilution factor at the time of use is within the allowable range of the dilution factor for each individual agricultural chemical or fertilizer . In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
An active ingredient table storage unit for storing an active ingredient table indicating an active ingredient contained in each pesticide or fertilizer;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, a registration process for taking in data for configuring the active ingredient table from the terminal device and writing it into the active ingredient table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device An effective component data input / output unit that reads data constituting the effective component table from the effective component table storage unit and provides the data to the terminal device;
Further comprising
The allowable range table is a table including the upper limit value of the number of times each active ingredient is used for each crop as the allowable range,
The usage plan table is a table including the planned value of the number of times each active ingredient is used for each crop as a usage plan,
The use result table is a table including the date of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as a use result,
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the planned number of times of use is equal to or lower than the upper limit of the number of uses for each of the active ingredients,
The use result determination unit refers to the effective component table to calculate the cumulative use count for each of the active components, and whether the calculated cumulative use count is less than or equal to the upper limit value of the use count A pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system characterized by making a judgment. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
An active ingredient table storage unit for storing an active ingredient table indicating an active ingredient contained in each pesticide or fertilizer and its content rate;
In response to a registration request from the terminal device, a registration process for taking in data for configuring the active ingredient table from the terminal device and writing it into the active ingredient table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device An effective component data input / output unit that reads data constituting the effective component table from the effective component table storage unit and provides the data to the terminal device;
Further comprising
The allowable range table is a table including the upper limit value of the amount of each active ingredient for each crop as the allowable range,
The usage plan table is a table including the planned values of the usage amounts of the individual active ingredients for each crop as the usage plan,
The use result table is a table including the use amount at the time of individual use for each agricultural field or fertilizer for each field, as the use result.
The use plan determination unit determines whether or not the plan value of the use amount is not more than the upper limit value of the use amount for each of the active ingredients,
The usage record determination unit calculates the cumulative usage amount for each of the active components by referring to the effective component table, and whether or not the calculated cumulative usage amount is equal to or less than the upper limit value of the usage amount. A pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system characterized by making a judgment. In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
For each agrochemical or fertilizer, a harvesting regulation table storage unit that stores a harvesting regulation table that indicates a harvesting regulation period that regulates the harvesting of crops after use of the agrochemical or fertilizer;
In response to a registration request from a terminal device, data for configuring the harvesting regulation table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the harvesting regulation table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device A harvesting regulation data input / output unit that reads the data constituting the harvesting regulation table from the harvesting regulation table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device;
Further comprising
The use result table is a table including the date of use of each pesticide or fertilizer for each field as a use result,
The use result warning unit further has a function of calculating a harvest control time for a crop cultivated in each field by referring to the use result table and the harvest control table, and presenting this to the terminal device. Pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system characterized by In the usage history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 5 ,
An authorization revocation table storage unit for storing an authorization revocation table indicating that the use authorization for each pesticide or fertilizer has expired;
In response to a registration request from a terminal device, data for configuring the authorization revocation table is fetched from the terminal device, and this is written in the authorization revocation table storage unit, and in response to a browsing request from the terminal device An authorization revocation data input / output unit that reads the data constituting the authorization revocation table from the authorization revocation table storage unit and provides this to the terminal device;
Further comprising
The use plan judgment unit refers to the authorization revocation table, and determines that the use plan for agricultural chemicals or fertilizers whose use authorization has expired is always outside the allowable range,
The use record determination unit refers to the authorization revocation table, and the use record for the pesticide or fertilizer for which use approval has expired is always determined to be outside the allowable range, Fertilizer usage history management system. In the usage history management system according to claim 13 ,
The usage plan data input / output unit and the usage record data input / output unit have a function of recognizing the user of the terminal device when receiving access from the terminal device,
When the usage plan data input / output unit performs the registration process of registering the usage plan in the usage plan table, it also registers information that identifies the user who registered the usage plan,
When the usage plan data input / output unit and usage result data input / output unit receive access from a terminal device, the usage plan table and authorization revocation table are referred to, and the usage plan registered by the accessing user Is included in the terminal device, and if it is included, warning information indicating that the pesticide or fertilizer has expired is displayed on the terminal device. A history of pesticide or fertilizer use history management system, further having a function of In the use history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 14 ,
Each data input / output unit has a function of recognizing a user of the terminal device by a pre-registered account and password when receiving an access from the terminal device. A pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system that allows registration and browsing of data within the scope of certain access rights. In the use history management system according to any one of claims 1 to 14 ,
When there is a progress confirmation request from the terminal device, the usage plan data input / output unit and the usage result data input / output unit work together to accumulate the usage plan in the usage plan table and the usage result accumulated in the usage result table. A pesticide or fertilizer usage history management system characterized by providing progress confirmation information in comparison with A program for causing a computer to function as the use history management system according to claim 1 .

Images