JP6895858B2 - Assist device, display control method and display control program - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a support device, a display control method, and a display control program.

Traditionally, methods for managing food safety and food hygiene have been institutionalized. Examples of such a system include JGAP (Japan Good Agricultural Practice), HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point), FCP (Food Communication Project) common factory management, AIB, JIB, ISO22000 and the like.

Each of these systems has its own standards for obtaining certification, and instructors who provide guidance on the systems inspect whether they meet the standards.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 7-193843 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2014-41595 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-88454

However, depending on the skill of the instructor, the test result of whether or not the criteria are met may vary. Skilled instructors know the points to note for each standard. For this reason, it may seem a bad example to an inexperienced instructor, but it may not be evaluated poorly by a skilled instructor.

One aspect is to provide support devices, display control methods and display control programs that can support the development of instructors.

According to one aspect of the present invention, the support device includes a reception unit, a calculation unit, and a display control unit. The reception department receives an evaluation from an instructor who gives guidance on a predetermined system to see if the content to be evaluated meets the criteria of the system. The calculation unit weights the evaluation received by the reception unit according to the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the content, and calculates the evaluation value for the content. When displaying the contents side by side, the display control unit controls the display mode of the contents according to the evaluation value calculated by the calculation unit.

According to one aspect of the present invention, it has the effect of being able to support the training of instructors.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a system according to the first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing the configuration of the server device according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of JGAP reference data. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of check items included in the sub-items of FIG. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the instructor table. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of inspection data. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of image management data. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of image evaluation data. FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically showing an operation screen. FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of the evaluation value of the image. FIG. 11 is a diagram schematically showing a case screen. FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the calculation process. FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the display control processing. FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a configuration of a computer that executes a display control program.

Hereinafter, examples of the support device, the display control method, and the display control program disclosed in the present application will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The disclosed technology is not limited by the present embodiment. In addition, the examples shown below may be appropriately combined as long as they do not cause a contradiction. In the following, an example of applying the present invention to the training of instructors of JGAP will be described, but the present invention may be applied to the training of instructors of other systems.

JGAP is a certification given to farms working on food safety and environmental protection. Farms that have passed the JGAP-based examination by a third-party examination will be given JGAP certification. This JGAP certified farm can prove to consumers and agricultural buyers that it is a farm that can be purchased and traded with peace of mind. In order for a farm to be certified by JGAP, it must meet the "JGAP Farm Management and Conformity Standards". In the following description, "JGAP Farm Management and Conformity Standards" will be simply referred to as the JGAP Standards. Since the content of the JGAP standard is complicated and there are multiple check items, it is difficult for the farm manager himself to understand the content of the JGAP standard and improve the farm. For this reason, the farm manager improves the farm so that it meets the JGAP standards by undergoing inspection and guidance by a JGAP instructor before being examined by a third-party organization.

Next, an example of the configuration of the system according to the first embodiment will be described. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a system according to the first embodiment. System 10 is a system that supports JGAP inspection and training of instructors. As shown in FIG. 1, the system 10 includes a server device 11 and a terminal device 12. For example, the server device 11 and the terminal device 12 are connected to each other via the network N. As one aspect of the network N, any kind of communication network such as LAN (Local Area Network), VPN (Virtual Private Network), and mobile communication network can be adopted regardless of whether it is wired or wireless. In the example of FIG. 1, two terminal devices 12 are shown, but the number of terminal devices 12 can be arbitrary.

The server device 11 is a computer that provides a support service that supports JGAP inspection and training of instructors. In this embodiment, the server device 11 corresponds to the support device. The server device 11 may be implemented by one computer, or may be implemented as a computer system by a plurality of computers. In this embodiment, in order to simplify the explanation, a case where the server device 11 is used as one computer will be described as an example.

The server device 11 stores various information such as the JGAP standard, and provides the terminal device 12 with various tools and Web (World Wide Web) services used by the instructor for guidance and inspection of JGAP. For example, the server device 11 provides the terminal device 12 with a tool for displaying each check item of the JGAP standard and a Web operation screen. Further, the server device 11 collects and manages various information such as information on the inspection result with respect to the JGAP standard carried out by the terminal device 12.

The terminal device 12 is, for example, a device used by an instructor when instructing a farm manager or the like in order to satisfy the JGAP standard. For example, the terminal device 12 is a mobile terminal device that can be carried and used by an instructor such as a smartphone or a tablet PC. The terminal device 12 has a camera 12a.

The terminal device 12 displays each check item of the JGAP standard by using a tool downloaded in advance from the server device 11 or by accessing the Web service provided by the server device 11. The instructor inputs to the terminal device 12 whether or not the check items are satisfied.

In addition, in the process of inspecting whether or not the check item criteria are met at various places on the farm, the instructor operates the terminal device 12 when, for example, finds a good case or a bad case. An image is taken by the camera 12a. When the image is taken, the terminal device 12 transmits the image data associated with the check item to the server device 11.

The server device 11 collects and manages information on inspection results such as JGAP standards transmitted from each terminal device 12 and image data associated with check items.

Next, the server device 11 according to the first embodiment will be described. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing the configuration of the server device according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, the server device 11 includes a communication unit 20, a storage unit 21, and a control unit 22.

The communication unit 20 is a communication interface such as a network card that performs data communication with the terminal device 12 and other devices via the network N. The control unit 22 exchanges data with the terminal device 12 and other devices via the communication unit 20.

The storage unit 21 is a storage device such as a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Drive), or an optical disk. The storage unit 21 may be a semiconductor memory in which data such as a RAM (Random Access Memory), a flash memory, and an NVSRAM (Non Volatile Static Random Access Memory) can be rewritten.

The storage unit 21 stores the OS (Operating System) and various programs executed by the control unit 22. For example, the storage unit 21 stores a program that executes a calculation process and a display control process, which will be described later. Further, the storage unit 21 stores various data used in the program executed by the control unit 22. For example, the storage unit 21 stores the JGAP reference data 30, the instructor table 31, the inspection data 32, the image management data 33, and the image evaluation data 34.

The JGAP standard data 30 is data having a plurality of check items arranged in a predetermined order to be inspected as to whether or not a predetermined standard is satisfied for agricultural products. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of JGAP reference data. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of check items included in the sub-items of FIG.

As shown in FIG. 3, the JGAP reference data 30 is classified into a large item, a medium item, and a small item. For example, the major item "A. Farm management and sales management" includes the middle items "1. Agricultural management", "2. Planning and recording", and "3. Sales management and traceability". For example, in the middle item "1. Farm management", the sub-items "1.1 Basic attitude", "1.2 Management of management resources", "1.3 Outsourcing management", "1.4 Violation of farm rules" Improvement and self-inspection ”is included.

As shown in FIG. 4, the small items in FIG. 3 correspond to the corresponding check items. Check items include, for example, item numbers, levels, control points, conformance criteria, and remarks. The item number is a number that uniquely identifies the check item. The level indicates the importance of the check item. There are essential, important, and effort in the level, and the magnitude relationship of importance is "effort <important <essential". The control points and conformance standards are defined by the standards required by the JGAP standards. The remarks show a supplementary explanation.

The instructor table 31 is a table that stores information about the instructor. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the instructor table. As shown in FIG. 5, the instructor table 31 has instructor ID, name, skill level, experience, and remarks items. The instructor ID is a number that uniquely identifies the instructor. The proficiency level indicates the proficiency level of the instructor for the JGAP inspection in a plurality of stages, and the higher the inspection skill, the higher the proficiency level. Although the instructor has sufficient knowledge about the JGAP standard, the skill level varies depending on the experience in the field. There are advanced, intermediate, and beginners in the skill level, and the magnitude relationship of the skill level is "advanced> intermediate> beginner". Experience indicates the number of years of experience of the instructor regarding the guidance and inspection of JGAP. The remarks show a supplementary explanation. For example, the instructor with the instructor ID "S0001" in FIG. 5 has a name of "XX XX", a skill level of "advanced", an experience of "10 years", and a remark "in XX month of XX year". It is remembered that it is "promotion".

The inspection data 32 is a table in which information about the inspection performed by the instructor is stored. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of inspection data. As shown in FIG. 6, the inspection data 32 has an inspection ID, an inspection target, an implementation instructor, a check item, an implementation date, and a result item. The inspection ID is a number that uniquely identifies the inspection. The inspection ID is newly assigned for each inspection performed on the inspection target such as a farm. The inspection target indicates the inspection target, and in this embodiment, the inspection target is indicated at the place where the inspection was performed, such as a farm. The check items indicate the item numbers and conformance criteria of the check items that were inspected. The implementation date indicates the date when the inspection of the check items was performed. The result shows the inspection result for the check item. The result is "OK" if it meets the criteria, and "NG" if it does not meet the criteria. For example, in the first line of FIG. 6, in the inspection of the inspection ID “E0001”, the instructor of the instructor ID “S0001” has the item number “1.1.1” shown in FIG. 4 for the inspection target “farm A”. Is performed on "September 1, 2017", indicating that the result is "OK". Further, in the second line of FIG. 6, in the inspection of the inspection ID “E0001”, the instructor of the instructor ID “S0001” has the item number “1.1.2” shown in FIG. 4 for the inspection target “farm A”. The inspection of the conformity standard "(1)" of "" is performed on "September 1, 2017", and the result is "OK".

The image management data 33 is a table that stores information about images taken in the inspection. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of image management data. As shown in FIG. 7, the image management data 33 has an inspection ID, a photographing location, a check item, and an image ID item. The inspection ID indicates the inspection ID of the inspection in which the image was taken. The photographing place indicates the place where the image was taken, and in this embodiment, it indicates the place where the inspection was performed such as a farm. The check item indicates the check item in which the image was taken. The image ID is a number that uniquely identifies the image data of the captured image. The image ID is newly assigned for each image data of the captured image. For example, in the inspection of the inspection ID "E0001" in FIG. 7, the image is taken at the "farm A", the check item is "1.1.1", and the image IDs are "G0001" and "G0002". Indicates that was taken. Further, in the inspection with the inspection ID "E0002", the image is taken at the "farm B", the check item is "1.1.1", and the image with the image ID "G0003" is taken. ..

The image evaluation data 34 is a table that stores information regarding the evaluation of the instructor with respect to the image taken in the inspection. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of image evaluation data. As shown in FIG. 8, the image evaluation data 34 has an image ID, an evaluator, and an evaluation item. The image ID indicates the image ID of the image evaluated by the instructor. The evaluator indicates the instructor ID of the instructor who evaluated the image. The evaluation indicates the evaluation for the image. The evaluation indicates a multi-step evaluation of whether the image is appropriate for the check item, and in this embodiment, there are good, no evaluation, and bad.

Returning to the description of FIG. The control unit 22 is a device that controls the server device 11. As the control unit 22, an electronic circuit such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) or MPU (Micro Processing Unit) or an integrated circuit such as an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) or FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) can be adopted. The control unit 22 has an internal memory for storing programs and control data that define various processing procedures, and executes various processing by these. The control unit 22 functions as various processing units by operating various programs. For example, the control unit 22 has a reception unit 40, a storage unit 41, a calculation unit 42, and a display control unit 43.

When the reception unit 40 receives the access, the reception unit 40 controls to send various operation screen information to the access source and display the operation screen on the access source. For example, the reception unit 40 displays the login screen on the terminal device 12 in response to the access from the terminal device 12, inputs the instructor ID and password of the instructor, and accepts the login. When the login is successful, the reception unit 40 controls the terminal device 12 to display various screens such as an operation screen.

The storage unit 41 collects and stores various types of data. For example, the storage unit 41 stores information regarding inspection results such as JGAP standards transmitted from each terminal device 12 in the storage unit 21. For example, the storage unit 41 stores the inspection ID of the inspection carried out, the farm to be inspected, the instructor who carried out the inspection, the actual check items, the date of the inspection, and the inspection result in the inspection data 32. Further, the storage unit 41 collects image data associated with the check items of the JGAP standard transmitted from each terminal device 12, and stores the collected image data in the storage unit 21. Further, the storage unit 41 stores the inspection ID, the shooting location, the check item, and the image ID of the collected image data in the image management data 33.

By the way, depending on the skill of the instructor, the inspection result of whether or not the conformity criteria of the check items are satisfied may vary. Skilled instructors know the points to note for each conformance criterion. For this reason, it may seem a bad example to an inexperienced instructor, but it may not be evaluated poorly by a skilled instructor. In order to reduce variations in such test results, it is preferable to train instructors using examples.

Therefore, the reception unit 40 receives an evaluation from the instructor on the image of the image data collected from each terminal device 12 as to whether or not the image satisfies the JGAP standard. For example, the reception unit 40 causes the terminal device 12 to display an operation screen for displaying a list of images associated with the check items for each check item of the JGAP standard. For example, the reception unit 40 accepts the designation of the check item for displaying the image on the operation screen, and displays a list of the images associated with the designated check item. Then, the reception unit 40 receives an evaluation from the instructor who operates the terminal device 12 on the operation screen whether the images displayed in the list satisfy the conformity criteria of the designated check items. The operation screen may be capable of specifying conditions for further narrowing down the images to be displayed. Further, it is preferable to display the conformity criteria of the designated check items on the operation screen.

FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically showing an operation screen. FIG. 9 schematically shows an operation screen 60 displayed on the browser of the terminal device 12. The operation screen 60 is an example of an operation screen that accepts an evaluation as to whether or not the image satisfies the conformity criteria of the check items. Images 1 to 9 are displayed on the operation screen 60. Each instructor evaluates the image. In the example of FIG. 9, each instructor with advanced skill level, intermediate skill level, and beginner level evaluates the image in three stages of good, non-evaluation, and bad. Images 1 to 9 show an example of the received evaluation results. “Medium / evil” shown in image 1 indicates that an instructor with an intermediate skill level evaluated it as bad. Further, "first / good" shown in image 3 indicates that the instructor with a beginner's skill level evaluated it as good.

The reception unit 40 stores information regarding the evaluation received on the operation screen in the storage unit 21. For example, the reception unit 40 stores the image ID of the evaluated image, the instructor ID of the instructor who evaluated the image, and the evaluation of the image in the image evaluation data 34. In this embodiment, the reception unit 40 stores the evaluation in the image evaluation data 34 for the image evaluated as good or bad, and does not store the evaluation in the image evaluation data 34 for the unevaluated image. It is supposed to be. However, the reception unit 40 may store the evaluation in the image evaluation data 34 even for the unevaluated image.

The calculation unit 42 calculates the evaluation value of the image based on the received evaluation. For example, the calculation unit 42 weights the received evaluation according to the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the image for the inspection, and calculates the evaluation value for the image. For example, the calculation unit 42 reads the evaluation value for each image from the image evaluation data 34. The calculation unit 42 weights the evaluation for each image according to the skill level of the instructor's inspection, totals the evaluation, and calculates the evaluation value for each image. For example, the calculation unit 42 obtains the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the image. Further, the calculation unit 42 initializes the evaluation value to zero. Then, when the instructor with an advanced skill level evaluates "good", the calculation unit 42 adds +3 to the evaluation value and -3 to the evaluation value evaluated as "bad". When the instructor with an intermediate skill level evaluates "good", the calculation unit 42 adds +2 to the evaluation value and gives -2 to the evaluation value evaluated as "bad". When the instructor whose skill level is beginner evaluates as "good", the calculation unit 42 adds +1 to the evaluation value and -1 to the evaluation value evaluated as "bad". The value that the calculation unit 42 adds or subtracts the evaluation value by weighting according to the skill level is an example, and is not limited to this.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of the evaluation value of the image. In the example of FIG. 10, an image having an image ID of "G0001" indicates that the evaluation value is "100".

By the way, as described above, in order to reduce the variation in the inspection results of each instructor, it is preferable to train the instructors by using examples. Therefore, the server device 11 according to the present embodiment provides, as an example, a case screen displaying an image collected at the time of inspection. This case screen is used when training instructors, for example, for training and guidance for instructors. The reception unit 40 receives a display instruction of the case screen from the operation screen. For example, the reception unit 40 accepts the designation of the check item for which the case is to be displayed on the operation screen.

The display control unit 43 controls to display the case screen. For example, the display control unit 43 reads out the image ID corresponding to the designated check item from the image management data 33. Then, the display control unit 43 controls to display a case screen in which the images of the read image IDs are arranged. For example, the display control unit 43 displays a case screen in which the image of the image ID is displayed as a thumbnail. Further, when displaying the images side by side, the display control unit 43 controls the display mode of the image to be displayed on the case screen according to the evaluation value for the image calculated by the calculation unit 42. For example, the display control unit 43 displays the images side by side in descending order of the evaluation value of the images. Further, for example, the display control unit 43 causes the image to be displayed larger as the evaluation value for the image is larger. For example, the display control unit 43 displays an image by gradually changing the size according to the evaluation value.

FIG. 11 is a diagram schematically showing a case screen. FIG. 11 schematically shows a case screen 70 displayed on the browser of the terminal device 12. Images 1 to 9 are displayed on the case screen 70. Images 1 to 9 are displayed side by side in descending order of evaluation value for the image. Further, the display size of the images 1 to 9 is changed according to the evaluation value for the image, and the larger the evaluation value is, the larger the display size is, and the smaller the evaluation value is displayed.

The control of the image display mode by the display control unit 43 is not limited to this, and any display mode can be used as long as it can distinguish between an image having a high evaluation value and an image having a low evaluation value. It may be. For example, the display control unit 43 may display a low-rated image by blinking the frame of the image or the entire image. For example, the display control unit 43 may display the image by gradually shortening the blinking cycle of the frame of the image or the entire image as the evaluation value for the image is smaller. Further, for example, the display control unit 43 may display the low-rated image in different colors, such as displaying the frame of the image or the entire image in red or gray.

Here, for example, when the server device 11 simply displays the images collected at the time of the inspection side by side on the case screen as an example at the time of training the instructor, the instructor displays a huge number of displayed images. It takes a very long time to determine which image is a good example (good management and high evaluation) and which image is a bad example (poor management and low evaluation). In addition, it may be difficult for an inexperienced instructor to even find out which image should be referred to because the confirmation points and the like are ambiguous.

On the other hand, the server device 11 changes the display mode of the image to be displayed on the case screen according to the evaluation value for the image. As a result, the instructor can distinguish between a good case image with a high evaluation value and a bad case image with a low evaluation value from the image displayed on the case screen, and check items from the good case image and the bad case image. You can quickly learn notable points for. In this way, the server device 11 can support the training of instructors.

Next, various processes of the server device 11 according to the first embodiment will be described. First, the calculation process in which the server device 11 calculates the evaluation value for each image will be described. FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the calculation process. This calculation process is executed at a predetermined timing, for example, at a predetermined time, when the operation screen for accepting the evaluation value of the image is completed, or at a timing before the display control process described later is executed.

As shown in FIG. 12, the calculation unit 42 initializes the evaluation values of all the images to zero (step S10). For example, the calculation unit 42 initializes the evaluation values for all the image IDs to zero.

The calculation unit 42 reads out the evaluation data for the image for each image from the image evaluation data 34 (step S11). For example, the calculation unit 42 reads out the evaluator and the evaluation of the image of the image ID in the order of the image ID from the image evaluation data 34.

The calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the number of evaluators and evaluations for the image read from the image evaluation data 34 is zero (step S12). When the number of cases is zero (step S12: Yes), the process proceeds to step S30 described later.

On the other hand, when the number of cases is not zero (step S12: No), the calculation unit 42 selects one unselected case from the evaluator and the evaluation for the image (step S13). The calculation unit 42 specifies the skill level of the instructor of the selected evaluator from the instructor table 31 (step S14).

The calculation unit 42 determines whether the instructor's skill level is advanced (step S15). When the skill level is advanced (step S15: Yes), the calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the selected evaluation is “good” (step S16). When the selected evaluation is "good" (step S16: Yes), the calculation unit 42 adds +3 to the evaluation value of the image ID for which the selected evaluation is obtained (step S17).

On the other hand, when the selected evaluation is not "good" (step S16: No), the calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the selected evaluation is "bad" (step S18). When the selected evaluation is "bad" (step S18: Yes), the calculation unit 42 performs -3 on the evaluation value of the image ID for which the selected evaluation is obtained (step S19).

On the other hand, when the selected evaluation is not "bad" (step S18: No), the evaluation is non-evaluation, so the process proceeds to step S29 described later.

On the other hand, when the instructor's skill level is not advanced (step S15: No), the calculation unit 42 determines whether the instructor's skill level is intermediate (step S20). When the skill level is intermediate (step S20: Yes), the calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the selected evaluation is “good” (step S21). When the selected evaluation is "good" (step S21: Yes), the calculation unit 42 performs +2 on the evaluation value of the image ID for which the selected evaluation is obtained (step S22).

On the other hand, when the selected evaluation is not "good" (step S21: No), the calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the selected evaluation is "bad" (step S23). When the selected evaluation is "bad" (step S23: Yes), the calculation unit 42 performs -2 on the evaluation value of the image ID for which the selected evaluation is obtained (step S24).

On the other hand, when the selected evaluation is not "bad" (step S23: No), the evaluation is non-evaluation, so the process proceeds to step S29 described later.

On the other hand, when the instructor's skill level is not intermediate (step S20: No), the instructor's skill level is a beginner. The calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the selected evaluation is “good” (step S25). When the selected evaluation is "good" (step S25: Yes), the calculation unit 42 adds +1 to the evaluation value of the image ID for which the selected evaluation is obtained (step S26).

On the other hand, when the selected evaluation is not "good" (step S25: No), the calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the selected evaluation is "bad" (step S27). When the selected evaluation is "bad" (step S27: Yes), the calculation unit 42 performs -1 on the evaluation value of the image ID for which the selected evaluation is obtained (step S28).

On the other hand, when the selected evaluation is not "bad" (step S27: No), the evaluation is non-evaluation, so the process proceeds to step S29 described later.

The calculation unit 42 determines whether or not all the evaluators and evaluations for the read image have been selected (step S29). If all are not selected (step S29: No), the process proceeds to step S13 described above.

On the other hand, when all are selected (step S29: Yes), the calculation unit 42 determines whether or not the evaluator and the evaluation are read from the image evaluation data 34 for all the image IDs (step S30). If it is not completed (step S30: No), the process proceeds to step S11 described above.

On the other hand, when completed (step S30: Yes), the calculation unit 42 stores the evaluation value of each image in the storage unit 21 (step S31), and ends the process.

Next, the display control process in which the server device 11 controls the display mode of the image according to the evaluation value will be described. FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the display control processing. This display control process is executed at a predetermined timing, for example, at a timing instructed to display the case screen by designating a check item for displaying the case.

As shown in FIG. 13, the display control unit 43 reads out the image ID of the image to be displayed corresponding to the designated check item from the image management data 33 (step S50). The display control unit 43 reads the evaluation value corresponding to each image ID from the storage unit 21 (step S51). The display control unit 43 selects image IDs in descending order of evaluation value (step S52). The display control unit 43 determines whether or not the evaluation value of the selected image ID is equal to or higher than a predetermined first threshold value (step S53). It is assumed that the magnitude relationship between the first threshold value and the second threshold value, which will be described later, is> the first threshold value> the second threshold value.

When the evaluation value is equal to or higher than the first threshold value (step S53: Yes), the display control unit 43 sets the display size to a large size and displays the images of the selected image ID on the case screen in order from the top (step S54). ).

On the other hand, when the evaluation value is not equal to or more than the first threshold value (step S53: No), it is determined whether or not the evaluation value is less than the first threshold value and equal to or more than the predetermined second threshold value (step S55). When the evaluation value is less than the first threshold value and equal to or more than the predetermined second threshold value (step S55: Yes), the display control unit 43 sets the display size to the medium size and displays the image of the selected image ID on the case screen. The images are displayed side by side in order from (step S56).

On the other hand, when the evaluation value is less than the first threshold value and not more than or equal to the predetermined second threshold value (step S55: No), the evaluation value is less than the second threshold value. The display control unit 43 sets the display size to a small size, and displays the images of the selected image ID on the case screen in order from the top (step S57).

The display control unit 43 determines whether or not the selection of all image IDs has been completed (step S58). If the selection of all image IDs has not been completed (step S58: No), the process proceeds to step S52 described above.

On the other hand, when the selection of all the image IDs is completed (step S58: Yes), the process ends.

Next, the effect will be described. The server device 11 receives an evaluation from an instructor who gives guidance on JGAP whether the image to be evaluated meets the criteria of JGAP. The server device 11 weights the received evaluation according to the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the image for the inspection, and calculates the evaluation value for the image. When displaying the images side by side, the server device 11 controls the display mode of the images according to the calculated evaluation value. As a result, the instructor can distinguish between an image having a high evaluation value and an image having a low evaluation value from the display mode of the image, and pays attention to satisfy the JGAP standard from the image having a high evaluation value and the image having a low evaluation value. You can quickly learn the points to be done. Therefore, the server device 11 can support the training of instructors.

Further, the server device 11 receives an evaluation of the image from the instructor for each evaluation item (check item) of JGAP. For each evaluation item, the server device 11 displays an image evaluated for the evaluation item in a display mode corresponding to the evaluation value. As a result, the instructor can distinguish between an image having a high evaluation value and an image having a low evaluation value from the display mode of the image for each evaluation item, and from an image having a high evaluation value and an image having a low evaluation value, for each evaluation item. In addition, you can quickly learn the points that should be noted in order to satisfy the criteria of the evaluation items. Therefore, the server device 11 can support the training of instructors.

In addition, the server device 11 accepts an evaluation of whether the image is a positive example or a negative example with respect to the JGAP standard. The server device 11 adds a weighted value to the evaluation value according to the proficiency level of the instructor who evaluated the evaluation for the evaluation with a positive example, and corresponds to the evaluation with a negative example. The evaluation value is calculated by subtracting the weighted value according to the skill level of the evaluated instructor from the evaluation value. As a result, the server device 11 can reflect a positive evaluation and a negative evaluation in the evaluation value, and for example, an image having many negative evaluations can be identifiablely displayed. By looking at images that are often negatively evaluated against the criteria, the instructor can grasp the points at which mistakes are likely to occur in the examination of the criteria.

Although the embodiments relating to the disclosed device have been described so far, the disclosed technique may be implemented in various different forms other than the above-described embodiments. Therefore, other examples included in the present invention will be described below.

For example, in Example 1 above, JGAP has been described as an example of the system, but it may be used for training instructors of other systems such as HACCP, FCP common factory management, AIB, JIB, and ISO22000.

Moreover, in the above-mentioned Example 1, the case where the content to be evaluated was imaged was illustrated. However, it is not limited to these. For example, the content to be evaluated may be a document file such as a moving image or a PDF file in which a manual or the like is described.

Further, in the first embodiment, the case where the server device 11 accepts the evaluation of the image, calculates the evaluation value, and controls the display of the case screen is illustrated. However, it is not limited to these. Part or all may be executed in the terminal device 12. For example, the terminal device 12 and the server device 11 may download necessary data or perform data synchronization, and the terminal device 12 may accept evaluations for images, calculate evaluation values, and control display of case screens. .. In this case, the terminal device 12 corresponds to the support device.

Further, in Example 1, a case where the display size of an image having a large evaluation value is increased is illustrated. However, it is not limited to these. The images may be arranged in ascending order of evaluation value, and the smaller the evaluation value, the larger the display size may be displayed on the case screen. As a result, an image of an example inappropriate for the check item can be displayed on the case screen. In addition, the reception unit 40 may accept designation of whether to display an appropriate example or an inappropriate example for the check item. When a designation to display an appropriate example is specified, the display control unit 43 arranges the images in descending order of the evaluation value, displays the display size on the case screen as the evaluation value increases, and displays an inappropriate example. If this is the case, the images may be arranged in ascending order of evaluation value, and the smaller the evaluation value, the larger the display size may be displayed on the case screen. Further, the display control unit 43 may select an image to be displayed according to the threshold value. For example, when the display control unit 43 is specified to display an appropriate example, the display control unit 43 displays an image having an evaluation value of a predetermined threshold value (for example, an evaluation value of 3) or more on the case screen, and displays an inappropriate example. When specified, an image having an evaluation value of a predetermined threshold value (for example, an evaluation value of -3) or less may be displayed on the case screen.

Further, in Example 1, the case where the evaluation value is calculated by weighting the evaluation of the image according to the skill level of the evaluated instructor is illustrated. However, it is not limited to these. For example, the calculation unit 42 may calculate the evaluation value for each skill level from the evaluation of the instructor of each skill level for the evaluation of the image. For example, the calculation unit 42 may calculate the evaluation value for each of advanced, intermediate, and beginners. Then, the display control unit 43 may control the display mode of the image based on the evaluation value for each skill level. For example, the reception unit 40 accepts the designation of the skill level to be displayed. The display control unit 43 may display the images by changing the display size and the arrangement order in descending order of the evaluation values of the designated proficiency among the evaluation values for each proficiency level. As a result, for example, an image having a high evaluation value or an image having a low evaluation value can be displayed by an instructor with a high skill level, and an instructor with a beginner or intermediate skill level can display an image with a high evaluation value. You can quickly learn the points you are paying attention to. Further, for example, the display control unit 43 may display an image having a large difference in evaluation value based on the evaluation value for each skill level in a different display mode. In this case, the evaluation value for each skill level may be obtained as the average value of the evaluation. For example, the reception unit 40 accepts the designation of displaying an image having a large difference in evaluation according to the skill level. The display control unit 43 obtains the difference between the evaluation value of the high skill level and the evaluation value of the low skill level based on the evaluation value for each skill level, and displays the images by changing the display size and the arrangement order in descending order of the difference. You may. For example, the display control unit 43 may obtain the difference between the evaluation value of the advanced user and the evaluation value of the beginner, and display an image having a large difference in a different display mode. For example, the display control unit 43 distinguishes and displays images in which the evaluation value of the advanced user is high, the evaluation value of the beginner is low, and the difference between the evaluation values is equal to or more than a predetermined threshold value. Further, the display control unit 43 distinguishes and displays images in which the evaluation value of the advanced user is low, the evaluation value of the beginner is high, and the difference between the evaluation values is equal to or more than a predetermined threshold value. As a result, an instructor with a beginner's skill level can quickly learn points that are easily misunderstood.

Further, the display control unit 43 may select images having various attributes more than the check items and display them on the case screen. For example, the reception unit 40 accepts the designation of the farm to be displayed. The display control unit 43 may display an image taken at a designated farm by changing the display mode according to the evaluation value of the image. In addition, for example, the target to be inspected such as a farm is divided into areas according to the characteristics such as area, climate, and geology. The storage unit 41 stores the image in the storage unit 21 in association with the information of the area in which the image was taken as an attribute. The reception unit 40 receives the designation of the area to be displayed. The display control unit 43 may display an image associated with the designated area by changing the display mode according to the evaluation value of the image. Further, the attribute associated with the image may be the information of the subject appearing in the captured image. For example, the attribute may be information on foods and agricultural products (plants, animals) shown in the image. The information of this attribute may be the name of the food or the agricultural product, or may be the information of the type in which the food or the agricultural product is classified. For example, when the foods and agricultural products handled on the farm are photographed, the attributes of the photographed foods and agricultural products may be associated with the images. When an instructor inspects a farm, the points to be noted in the inspection may differ depending on the area of the farm, the foods handled, and the agricultural products. Therefore, by designating the attributes of the area, food, and agricultural products so that the image of the case can be displayed, the instructor can quickly learn the points to be noted for each attribute of the area, food, and agricultural products. Further, the attribute associated with the image may be an industry to be inspected, such as agriculture, transportation, manufacturing, and stores. When an instructor inspects, the points to be noted in the inspection may differ depending on the type of industry to be inspected. Therefore, by designating the type of industry and making it possible to display the image of the case, the instructor can quickly learn the points to be noted for each type of industry.

Instructors may also have areas with high inspection experience, types of agricultural products, and industries. Therefore, the area, the type of agricultural product, the type of industry, etc. may be assigned to the image and the instructor as attributes. Then, the calculation unit 42 may calculate the evaluation value for the content by weighting the evaluation as much as the degree of matching between the attributes of the image and the attributes of the instructor who evaluated the image is higher. For example, when an image of an area A, an agricultural product A, and an industry A is evaluated by an instructor with an advanced skill level having the attributes of the area A, the agricultural product A, and the industry A, the calculation unit 42 has an attribute of 3. Since there are two matches, the value "3" to be added by the instructor of the advanced level may be added to the number "3" whose attributes match, and "+6" may be added to the evaluation value. The weighting based on the degree of matching of the attributes is an example, and is not limited to this.

Further, each component of each of the illustrated devices is a functional concept, and does not necessarily have to be physically configured as shown in the figure. That is, the specific state of distribution / integration of each device is not limited to the one shown in the figure, and all or part of it is functionally or physically distributed / physically in arbitrary units according to various loads and usage conditions. Can be integrated and configured. For example, the processing units of the reception unit 40, the storage unit 41, the calculation unit 42, and the display control unit 43 may be integrated as appropriate. Further, each processing function performed in each processing unit may be realized by a CPU and a program analyzed and executed by the CPU, or may be realized as hardware by wired logic. ..

[Display control program]
Further, the various processes described in the above-described embodiment can also be realized by executing a program prepared in advance on a computer system such as a personal computer or a workstation. Therefore, an example of a computer system that executes a program having the same function as that of the above embodiment will be described below. FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a configuration of a computer that executes a display control program.

As shown in FIG. 14, the computer 400 has a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 410, an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) 420, and a RAM (Random Access Memory) 440. Each of these 400 to 440 parts is connected via the bus 500.

The HDD 420 stores in advance a display control program 420a that exhibits the same functions as the reception unit 40, the storage unit 41, the calculation unit 42, and the display control unit 43. The display control program 420a may be separated as appropriate.

Further, the HDD 420 stores various information. For example, the HDD 420 stores various data used for determining the OS and the order quantity.

Then, the CPU 410 reads the display control program 420a from the HDD 420 and executes it to execute the same operation as each processing unit of the embodiment. That is, the display control program 420a executes the same operations as the reception unit 40, the storage unit 41, the calculation unit 42, and the display control unit 43.

The display control program 420a described above does not necessarily have to be stored in the HDD 420 from the beginning.

Further, for example, the display control program 420a may be stored in a "portable physical medium" such as a flexible disk (FD), a CD-ROM, a DVD disk, a magneto-optical disk, or an IC card inserted in the computer 400. .. Then, the computer 400 may read the program from these and execute the program.

Further, the program is stored in an "other computer (or server)" connected to the computer 400 via a public line, the Internet, a LAN, a WAN, or the like. Then, the computer 400 may read the program from these and execute the program.

10 System 11 Server device 12 Terminal device 22 Control unit 40 Reception unit 41 Storage unit 42 Calculation unit 43 Display control unit

Claims (7)

The reception department that receives evaluations from instructors who provide guidance on a predetermined system to see if the content to be evaluated meets the criteria of the system.
The evaluation unit that calculates the evaluation value for the content by weighting the evaluation received by the reception unit according to the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the content.
When displaying the contents side by side, a display control unit that controls the display mode of the contents according to an evaluation value calculated by the calculation unit, and a display control unit.
Support device with. The reception department receives evaluations for the content from the instructor for each evaluation item of the system.
The support device according to claim 1, wherein the display control unit displays the content evaluated for each evaluation item in a display mode according to the evaluation value. The reception department receives an evaluation of whether the content is a positive example or a negative example with respect to the standard of the system.
The calculation unit adds a weighted value to the evaluation value according to the proficiency level of the instructor who evaluated the evaluation for the evaluation with a positive example, and corresponds to the evaluation with a negative example. The support device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the evaluation value is calculated by subtracting the weighted value according to the skill level of the evaluated instructor from the evaluation value. A predetermined attribute is associated with the content, and the content is associated with the content.
The reception unit accepts the specification of the attribute of the content to be displayed,
The support device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the display control unit displays content associated with a designated attribute in a display mode according to an evaluation value. The content and the instructor are associated with predetermined attributes.
The calculation unit is characterized in that the evaluation value for the content is calculated by weighting the evaluation as much as the degree of matching between the attribute of the content and the attribute of the instructor who evaluated the content is higher. The support device according to any one of claims 1 to 4. We accept evaluations from instructors who provide guidance on the prescribed system to see if the content to be evaluated meets the criteria of the system.
The received evaluation is weighted according to the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the content, and the evaluation value for the content is calculated.
A display control method characterized in that, when displaying the contents side by side, a computer executes a process of controlling the display mode of the contents according to a calculated evaluation value. We accept evaluations from instructors who provide guidance on the prescribed system to see if the content to be evaluated meets the criteria of the system.
The received evaluation is weighted according to the skill level of the instructor who evaluated the content, and the evaluation value for the content is calculated.
A display control program comprising causing a computer to execute a process of controlling a display mode of the contents according to a calculated evaluation value when the contents are displayed side by side.

Images