JP6824322B2 - How to check the member mounting position - Google Patents

How to check the member mounting position Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6824322B2
JP6824322B2 JP2019079137A JP2019079137A JP6824322B2 JP 6824322 B2 JP6824322 B2 JP 6824322B2 JP 2019079137 A JP2019079137 A JP 2019079137A JP 2019079137 A JP2019079137 A JP 2019079137A JP 6824322 B2 JP6824322 B2 JP 6824322B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mounting position
mounting
shape
welded structure
confirming
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2019079137A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020176912A (en
Inventor
裕 平川
裕 平川
誠 三宅
誠 三宅
康 田部井
康 田部井
敦 瀬戸川
敦 瀬戸川
横山 徹
徹 横山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
IHI Infrastructure Systems Co Ltd
Original Assignee
IHI Infrastructure Systems Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IHI Infrastructure Systems Co Ltd filed Critical IHI Infrastructure Systems Co Ltd
Priority to JP2019079137A priority Critical patent/JP6824322B2/en
Publication of JP2020176912A publication Critical patent/JP2020176912A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6824322B2 publication Critical patent/JP6824322B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、溶接構造物における部材取付位置の確認方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for confirming a member mounting position in a welded structure.

従来より、特に大型の溶接構造物の所定位置に設計通りに部材が取り付けられたかを確認するには、メジャーなどの測定器で実寸を測って確認を行っていた。 Conventionally, in order to confirm whether or not a member has been attached to a predetermined position of a particularly large welded structure as designed, the actual size has been measured with a measuring instrument such as a measure.

一方、例えば、特許文献1のように、評価対象物の三次元形状・位置品質の評価を行う三次元形状・位置品質評価方法が知られている。この方法では、データ入力工程と、特徴抽出工程と、品質評価工程とを有し、位置合わせが行われた座標変換後の計測データ及び評価対象物のCADデータから評価対象物に対して品質評価を行うようにしている。 On the other hand, for example, as in Patent Document 1, there is known a three-dimensional shape / position quality evaluation method for evaluating the three-dimensional shape / position quality of an evaluation object. This method has a data input process, a feature extraction process, and a quality evaluation process, and quality evaluation is performed on the evaluation object from the measured measurement data after coordinate conversion in which alignment is performed and the CAD data of the evaluation object. I try to do.

特開2009−264956号公報JP-A-2009-264965

特許文献1のような方法は、小型の製品に対する品質評価について行われており、橋桁などの大型の溶接構造物の品質評価については評価対象とはしていない。 The method as in Patent Document 1 is performed for quality evaluation of small products, and does not include quality evaluation of large welded structures such as bridge girders.

一方、大型溶接構造物についてメジャー等で測定する場合には、一人での測定は難しく、複数人で測定する必要がある上に、非常に時間が多くかかる。このため、工程内の限られた時間内で全てを照査することは現実的ではなく、もれが生じる可能性がある。 On the other hand, when measuring a large welded structure with a tape measure or the like, it is difficult to measure by one person, it is necessary to measure by a plurality of people, and it takes a very long time. For this reason, it is not realistic to check everything within the limited time in the process, and leakage may occur.

取付部材の取付位置がずれたまま本溶接されて製品が完成した後、現場で組み立てたときに取付部材が干渉するなどの不具合が発生すると、作業を止めて取付部材を取り付け直さないといけないという問題が発生する。 After the product is completed by main welding with the mounting position of the mounting member shifted, if a problem such as interference of the mounting member occurs when assembling at the site, the work must be stopped and the mounting member must be remounted. Problems occur.

本発明は、かかる点に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的とするところは、少ない人数で簡単且つ確実に部品が正しい位置に取り付けられているかを確認できるようにすることにある。 The present invention has been made in view of this point, and an object of the present invention is to enable a small number of people to easily and surely confirm whether or not a component is installed in a correct position.

上記の目的を達成するために、第1の発明では、溶接構造物における取付部材の取付位置を確認する部材取付位置の確認方法を対象とする。 In order to achieve the above object, the first invention covers a method of confirming a member mounting position for confirming a mounting position of a mounting member in a welded structure.

そして、上記確認方法は、
溶接構造物の三次元設計形状を予め記憶装置に記憶させる設計形状記憶工程と、
上記取付部材が取り付けられた本溶接前の上記溶接構造物を載置する溶接構造物載置工程と、
上記溶接構造物の形状を撮像可能な位置に三次元形状計測器を配置する計測器配置工程と、
上記三次元形状計測器を用いて上記溶接構造物の形状を計測して送信する三次元形状計測工程と、
コンピュータによって上記三次元形状計測器で計測された三次元計測形状と、予め記憶された三次元設計形状とを比較し、上記取付部材の板厚方向における取付位置の相違の有無を抽出する相違点抽出工程と、
上記コンピュータによって相違点が抽出された取付部材を表示部に視覚的に明示する相違点明示工程と、
表示部に明示された相違点のうち、取付部材の取付位置を変更する必要があるか否かを判定する取付位置修正有無判断工程と、
取付位置の変更が必要と判断された取付部材を上記三次元設計形状と同一の正しい位置に取り付け直す取付位置修正実行工程とを含む構成とする。
And the above confirmation method is
A design shape storage process that stores the three-dimensional design shape of the welded structure in a storage device in advance,
The welded structure mounting process for mounting the welded structure before the main welding to which the mounting member is attached, and
The measuring instrument placement process of arranging the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument at a position where the shape of the welded structure can be imaged,
The three-dimensional shape measurement process of measuring and transmitting the shape of the welded structure using the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument, and
Differences in which the three-dimensional measurement shape measured by the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument by a computer is compared with the three-dimensional design shape stored in advance, and the presence or absence of a difference in the mounting position in the plate thickness direction of the mounting member is extracted. Extraction process and
The difference specification step of visually indicating the mounting member whose difference has been extracted by the above computer on the display unit, and
Among the differences specified on the display unit, the mounting position correction presence / absence determination process for determining whether or not the mounting position of the mounting member needs to be changed, and
The configuration includes a mounting position correction execution step of remounting the mounting member for which it is determined that the mounting position needs to be changed to the same correct position as the above three-dimensional design shape.

上記の構成によると、大型の溶接構造物でも計測可能な三次元形状計測器を用いることで、一人でも溶接構造物の外形形状を容易に測定できる。そして、予め記憶した三次元設計形状と実測した三次元計測形状とを比較して明示することで、従来行われていた複数人でのメジャーで測定した測定の場合に比べ、少ない人数でより正確に迅速に取付位置を確認することができる。そして、取付位置が違っているときに取付位置を修正することで、そのまま後工程に進むのを防止することができる。なお、「本溶接」とは、取付部材の取付のための溶接(仮付け溶接、仮溶接、組立溶接ともいう)に対し、溶接強度など製品として必要な条件を満たすために行う溶接のことをいう。 According to the above configuration, by using a three-dimensional shape measuring instrument that can measure even a large welded structure, even one person can easily measure the outer shape of the welded structure. Then, by comparing and clarifying the three-dimensional design shape memorized in advance and the actually measured three-dimensional measurement shape, it is more accurate with a smaller number of people than the conventional measurement with a measure by multiple people. The mounting position can be confirmed quickly. Then, by correcting the mounting position when the mounting position is different, it is possible to prevent the process from proceeding to the subsequent process as it is. In addition, "main welding" refers to welding performed to satisfy the necessary conditions as a product such as welding strength, as opposed to welding for mounting mounting members (also referred to as temporary welding, temporary welding, and assembly welding). Say.

第2の発明では、第1の発明において、
上記三次元設計形状は、上記取付部材の本溶接の前の自重による撓み及び溶接による縮み代を考慮した形状である。
In the second invention, in the first invention,
The three-dimensional design shape is a shape that takes into consideration the bending due to its own weight before the main welding of the mounting member and the shrinkage allowance due to welding.

最終的な完成後の製品形状は、溶接後の完成形状であり、取付部材の取付位置を確認するのは、本溶接する前の仮固定された状態であって、実際には、取付部材の自重や溶接時の縮みを考慮した形状にしないと、多くの部位で取付位置の相違点を検出してしまうことになる。しかし、上記の構成によると、三次元設計形状を取付部材の本溶接の前の自重による撓み及び溶接による縮み代を考慮した形状としているので、三次元計測形状と比較することで、より正確且つ確実に取付部材の取付位置の間違いを抽出することができる。 The final finished product shape is the finished shape after welding, and the mounting position of the mounting member is confirmed in the temporarily fixed state before the main welding, and in reality, the mounting member If the shape is not designed in consideration of its own weight and shrinkage during welding, differences in mounting positions will be detected in many parts. However, according to the above configuration, the three-dimensional design shape is a shape that takes into consideration the deflection due to its own weight before the main welding of the mounting member and the shrinkage allowance due to welding, so that it is more accurate and more accurate by comparing with the three-dimensional measurement shape. It is possible to reliably extract mistakes in the mounting position of the mounting member.

第3の発明では、第1又は第2の発明において、
上記溶接構造物は、橋桁の一部を構成する鈑桁ブロックであり、
上記取付部材は、上記鈑桁ブロックに位置決めされた本溶接前の鋼板である。
In the third invention, in the first or second invention,
The welded structure is a plate girder block that forms part of the bridge girder.
The mounting member is a steel plate before main welding positioned on the plate girder block.

鈑桁ブロックは、一般的に大型の溶接構造物であり、メジャー等による実測で取付部材の取付位置を確認するのは非常に困難且つ時間がかかるが、上記の構成によると、簡単且つ確実に取付部材の取付位置の間違いを抽出することができる。 The plate girder block is generally a large welded structure, and it is very difficult and time-consuming to confirm the mounting position of the mounting member by actual measurement with a measure or the like, but according to the above configuration, mounting is easy and reliable. It is possible to extract mistakes in the mounting position of members.

第4の発明では、第3の発明において、
上記溶接構造物は、長さ10m以上の大型溶接構造物である。
In the fourth invention, in the third invention,
The welded structure is a large welded structure having a length of 10 m or more.

特に10m以上の大型溶接構造物であると、溶接工程が終了した最終製品で現場に運ばれ、現場で組み立てられるので、取付位置の間違いがあると、作業を中断して取付位置の修正を行わなければならず、全体の作業工程に対する影響が大きいが、上記の構成によると、簡単且つ確実に取付部材の取付位置の間違いを抽出することができるので、現場での取付位置の修正が確実に防止される。 Especially for large welded structures of 10 m or more, the final product after the welding process is transported to the site and assembled at the site. Therefore, if there is a mistake in the mounting position, the work is interrupted and the mounting position is corrected. It has to be done, and it has a great influence on the whole work process. However, according to the above configuration, it is possible to easily and surely extract an error in the mounting position of the mounting member, so that the mounting position can be corrected on site. Be prevented.

以上説明したように、本発明によれば、少ない人数で簡単且つ確実に部品が正しい位置に取り付けられているかを確認できるようにする。 As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to easily and surely confirm whether or not the parts are mounted in the correct positions with a small number of people.

本発明の実施形態に係る部材取付位置の確認方法を説明するための斜視図である。It is a perspective view for demonstrating the method of confirming the member mounting position which concerns on embodiment of this invention. 鈑桁ブロックの一部を拡大して示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows a part of the plate girder block enlarged. (a)は、NC罫書き指示姿を示し、(b)は、正しい取付位置を示し、(c)は、間違った取付位置を示す図である。(A) shows the NC ruled instruction figure, (b) shows the correct mounting position, and (c) shows the wrong mounting position.

以下、本発明の実施形態を図面に基づいて説明する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

図1は、本発明の実施形態の部材取付位置の確認方法を示し、この確認方法は、例えば、溶接構造物としての鈑桁ブロック1における取付部材としての鋼板(例えば垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4)の取付位置を確認する方法である。 FIG. 1 shows a method for confirming a member mounting position according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which, for example, a steel plate as a mounting member (for example, a vertical stiffener 3 and a horizontal stiffener 3) in a plate girder block 1 as a welded structure is used. This is a method of confirming the mounting position of the rigid material 4).

この鈑桁ブロック1は、長さ10m以上の大型溶接構造物であり、図2にも拡大して示すように、I型の鈑桁本体2に垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4とが所定位置に溶接されている。以下の説明では、このうち垂直補剛材3又は水平補剛材4の取付位置の確認について説明するが、これに限定されない。 This plate girder block 1 is a large welded structure having a length of 10 m or more, and as shown in an enlarged view in FIG. 2, a vertical stiffener 3 and a horizontal stiffener 4 are predetermined on the I-shaped plate girder body 2. Welded in position. In the following description, confirmation of the mounting position of the vertical stiffener 3 or the horizontal stiffener 4 will be described, but the present invention is not limited to this.

鈑桁ブロック1の製造工程は、(1)鈑桁本体2の組立、(2)鈑桁本体2の溶接、(3)垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4の組立、(4)垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4の溶接、(5)歪み矯正といった手順で行われる。 The manufacturing process of the plate girder block 1 is as follows: (1) assembly of the plate girder body 2, (2) welding of the plate girder body 2, (3) assembly of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4, and (4) vertical stiffener. The procedure is as follows: welding 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 and (5) strain correction.

この確認方法は、(3)の垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4の組立工程の後に行われる。(3)の垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4の組立工程では、仮付け溶接のみが行われており、いわゆる本溶接は行われていない。 This confirmation method is performed after the assembling step of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 in (3). In the assembly process of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 of (3), only temporary welding is performed, and so-called main welding is not performed.

この取付位置の確認は、従来、複数人でメジャー等を用いて測定する必要がある上に、非常に時間が多くかかっていた。このため、工程内の限られた時間内で全てを照査することは現実的ではなく、実質的には取り付けの有無程度の確認は可能であったが、板厚程度の取付位置のズレを全ての取付部材について行うのは困難であった。 Conventionally, confirmation of this mounting position has required a large number of people to measure using a tape measure or the like, and it takes a very long time. For this reason, it is not realistic to check everything within the limited time in the process, and it was possible to confirm the presence or absence of mounting, but all the deviations in the mounting position of the plate thickness are all. It was difficult to do with the mounting members of.

図3(a)に示すように、鈑桁本体2には、NCによって罫書き指示5が書き込まれている。本来は、図3(b)に示すように、山の頂点6側に垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4が来るようにして、その外面が罫書き指示5に沿うように取り付けられる。取付は、点溶接などの仮付け溶接で行われる。しかし、取付は作業者が罫書き指示5を見ながら行うので、図3(b)に示すように、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4が取り付けられるべき側(山の頂点6側)と反対側に取り付けられることがある。 As shown in FIG. 3A, a ruled writing instruction 5 is written on the plate girder body 2 by NC. Originally, as shown in FIG. 3B, the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 come to the apex 6 side of the mountain, and the outer surface thereof is attached so as to follow the ruled instruction 5. Mounting is performed by temporary welding such as spot welding. However, since the operator performs the mounting while looking at the ruled instruction 5, as shown in FIG. 3 (b), the side to which the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 should be mounted (the peak 6 side of the mountain). May be installed on the opposite side.

この状態をメジャー等による実測で見落とした場合、(4)の本溶接で垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4を溶接し、そのままで出荷すると、現場で鈑桁ブロック1を組み立てるときに、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の取付位置がその板厚分だけずれていると、組立できないことがある。 If this condition is overlooked by actual measurement with a major or the like, if the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are welded in the main welding of (4) and shipped as they are, when the plate girder block 1 is assembled on site, it is vertical. If the mounting positions of the stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are deviated by the plate thickness, assembly may not be possible.

その場合、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の溶接を全て取り除いて正しい位置につけ直さなければならない。 In that case, all the welds of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 must be removed and reattached in the correct position.

その間、現場での作業が中断され、工程が大幅に遅れてしまうという問題がある。 During that time, there is a problem that the work at the site is interrupted and the process is significantly delayed.

しかしながら本実施形態の確認方法では、まず、設計形状記憶工程において、鈑桁ブロック1の三次元設計形状を予めサーバ13に記憶しておく。このとき記憶される三次元設計形状は、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4等の本溶接の前で、且つ橋桁として組み立てる前の、鈑桁ブロック1の自重による撓み(キャンバー値)及び溶接による縮み代などの補正値を考慮した形状である。要するに鈑桁ブロック1は、最終的に橋桁として組み立てたときに鈑桁ブロック1と他の部品とが設計通りに組み立てられるように寸法が決められるが、鈑桁ブロック1の製作途中では、自重や後工程における溶接変形などによる変形が考えられる。このため、パソコン12等において、予めインストールしたソフトウエアを用い、最終製品形状の三次元CADデータに対し、上記補正値を考慮して予め演算して作成しておき、記憶装置としてのサーバ13やパソコン12に記憶しておく。 However, in the confirmation method of the present embodiment, first, in the design shape storage step, the three-dimensional design shape of the plate girder block 1 is stored in the server 13 in advance. The three-dimensional design shape memorized at this time is the deflection (camber value) and welding due to the weight of the plate girder block 1 before the main welding of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 and before assembling as a bridge girder. It is a shape that takes into account the correction value such as the shrinkage allowance due to. In short, the dimensions of the plate girder block 1 are determined so that when the plate girder block 1 is finally assembled as a bridge girder, the plate girder block 1 and other parts can be assembled as designed. Deformation due to welding deformation is conceivable. Therefore, in a personal computer 12 or the like, using software installed in advance, the three-dimensional CAD data of the final product shape is calculated and created in advance in consideration of the above correction value, and the server 13 as a storage device or Store it in the personal computer 12.

次いで、図1に示すように、鈑桁ブロック載置工程において、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4が取り付けられた鈑桁ブロック1を載置する。このとき、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の取付位置がよく見える状態にして載置する。 Next, as shown in FIG. 1, in the plate girder block mounting step, the plate girder block 1 to which the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are attached is mounted. At this time, the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are placed so that the mounting positions can be clearly seen.

次いで、計測器配置工程において、鈑桁ブロック1の形状を撮像可能な位置に三次元形状計測器を配置する。三次元形状計測器としては、例えば、全天球カメラ搭載の3Dレーザースキャナーが使用される。この3Dスキャナー10は、例えば水平360°、垂直300°で0.6m〜60m程度の範囲の三次元形状をレーザーを用いて計測できる。三次元形状計測器は、これに限定されないが、本実施形態のような大型の溶接構造物の計測が可能なように計測範囲の広いものを使用する。 Next, in the measuring instrument arrangement step, the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument is arranged at a position where the shape of the plate girder block 1 can be imaged. As the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument, for example, a 3D laser scanner mounted on an omnidirectional camera is used. The 3D scanner 10 can measure a three-dimensional shape in a range of about 0.6 m to 60 m at a horizontal 360 ° and a vertical 300 ° using a laser, for example. The three-dimensional shape measuring instrument is not limited to this, but an instrument having a wide measuring range is used so as to be able to measure a large welded structure as in the present embodiment.

次いで、三次元形状計測工程において、3Dスキャナー10を用いて鈑桁ブロック1の形状を計測する。場合によっては、複数の3Dスキャナー10で計測したり、別の位置に3Dスキャナーを置き直して計測してもよい。3Dスキャナー10で計測されたデータは、無線LANルーター11等を介してコンピュータとしてのパソコン12やタブレットに送信される。また、サーバ13に記憶してもよい。 Next, in the three-dimensional shape measuring step, the shape of the plate girder block 1 is measured using the 3D scanner 10. In some cases, measurement may be performed by a plurality of 3D scanners 10, or the 3D scanner may be repositioned at another position for measurement. The data measured by the 3D scanner 10 is transmitted to a personal computer 12 or a tablet as a computer via a wireless LAN router 11 or the like. Further, it may be stored in the server 13.

次いで、相違点抽出工程において、3Dスキャナー10で計測された三次元計測形状と、予め記憶された三次元設計形状とを比較し、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の板厚方向における取付位置の相違の有無を抽出する。具体的には、図3(b)に示したような板厚方向への取付位置のズレがないかを判定する。この判定には、パソコン12に予めインストールされたソフトウエア等を用いればよい。例えば、ソフトウエアによって誤差が所定値よりも大きい部分を抽出する。三次元設計形状における垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の板厚方向における取付位置と、計測された垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の板厚方向における取付位置とを比較する。 Next, in the difference extraction step, the three-dimensional measurement shape measured by the 3D scanner 10 and the three-dimensional design shape stored in advance are compared, and the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are in the plate thickness direction. Extract the presence or absence of differences in mounting positions. Specifically, it is determined whether or not there is a deviation in the mounting position in the plate thickness direction as shown in FIG. 3 (b). For this determination, software or the like pre-installed on the personal computer 12 may be used. For example, software extracts a portion where the error is larger than a predetermined value. Compare the mounting position of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 in the plate thickness direction in the three-dimensional design shape with the measured mounting position of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 in the plate thickness direction. ..

次いで、相違点明示工程において、パソコン12は、ソフトウエアによって、取付位置の誤差が所定値よりも大きい部位を赤色で視覚的に明示する。表示はパソコン12の表示部14で行ってもよいし、タブレットの画面で行ってもよい。 Next, in the difference identification step, the personal computer 12 visually indicates the portion where the error of the mounting position is larger than the predetermined value in red by the software. The display may be performed on the display unit 14 of the personal computer 12 or on the screen of the tablet.

次いで、取付位置修正有無判断工程において、作業者は、表示部に明示された相違点のうち、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の取付位置を変更する必要があるか否かを判定する。表示部14に表示された色分けされた部分を確認し、例えば、板厚方向の取り付け間違いが発生していると判断すれば、取付位置を変更する必要があると判断する。 Next, in the mounting position correction presence / absence determination step, the operator determines whether or not it is necessary to change the mounting positions of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 among the differences indicated on the display unit. To do. The color-coded portion displayed on the display unit 14 is confirmed, and for example, if it is determined that a mounting error in the plate thickness direction has occurred, it is determined that the mounting position needs to be changed.

場合によっては、ヘッドセットを含むVR装置で相違点を確認するようにしてもよい。そうすれば、取付位置が間違っている部位をVR装置を用いた仮想空間で容易に確認することができる。作業者は、この明示された相違点を確認し、取付位置が誤っていることを視覚的に把握する。例えば、取付位置が板厚分だけずれていると、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の大部分が赤色等で明示され、取付位置の間違いを容易に見つけて修正が必要か否かを判断することができる。 In some cases, the difference may be confirmed with a VR device including a headset. Then, the part where the mounting position is wrong can be easily confirmed in the virtual space using the VR device. The operator confirms this explicit difference and visually grasps that the mounting position is incorrect. For example, if the mounting position is deviated by the plate thickness, most of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are clearly shown in red or the like, and it is easy to find an error in the mounting position and correct it. Can be judged.

次いで、取付位置修正実行工程において、取付位置の修正が必要と判断した垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の仮溶接を取り除き、三次元設計形状と同一の正しい位置に配置して仮溶接等によって取り付け直す。 Next, in the mounting position correction execution step, the temporary welding of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 that are determined to require correction of the mounting position is removed, and the temporary welding is placed at the same correct position as the three-dimensional design shape. Reinstall by etc.

次いで、後工程の(4)垂直補剛材3と水平補剛材4の溶接に進む。 Next, the process proceeds to the subsequent step (4) welding of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4.

このように、本実施形態では、大型の鈑桁ブロック1でも計測可能な3Dスキャナー10を用いることで、一人でも鈑桁ブロック1の外形形状を測定できる。そして、予め記憶した三次元設計形状と実測した三次元計測形状とを比較して明示することで、従来行われていた複数人でのメジャーで測定した測定の場合に比べ、少ない人数でより正確に迅速に取付位置を確認することができる。これにより、取付位置が違っているときに取付位置を修正することで、そのまま後工程に進むのを防止することができる。 As described above, in the present embodiment, by using the 3D scanner 10 that can measure even the large plate girder block 1, even one person can measure the outer shape of the plate girder block 1. Then, by comparing and clarifying the three-dimensional design shape memorized in advance and the actually measured three-dimensional measurement shape, it is more accurate with a smaller number of people than the conventional measurement with a measure by multiple people. The mounting position can be confirmed quickly. As a result, it is possible to prevent the process from proceeding to the subsequent process as it is by correcting the mounting position when the mounting position is different.

また、最終的な完成後の製品形状は、溶接後の完成形状であり、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の取付位置を確認するのは、本溶接する前の仮固定された状態であって、実際には、垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の自重や溶接時の縮みを考慮した形状にしないと、多くの部位で取付位置の相違点を検出することになる。しかし、本実施形態では、三次元設計形状を垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の本溶接の前の自重による撓み及び溶接による縮み代を考慮した形状としているので、三次元計測形状と比較することで、より正確且つ確実に垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の取付位置の間違いを抽出することができる。 Further, the final finished product shape is the finished shape after welding, and the mounting position of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 is confirmed in the temporarily fixed state before the main welding. However, in reality, if the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 are not shaped in consideration of their own weight and shrinkage during welding, differences in mounting positions will be detected in many parts. However, in the present embodiment, the three-dimensional design shape is a shape that takes into consideration the bending of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 due to their own weight before the main welding and the shrinkage allowance due to the welding. By comparing, it is possible to more accurately and surely extract an error in the mounting position of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4.

本実施形態のように、溶接構造物が10m以上の大型鈑桁ブロック1であると、溶接工程が終了した最終製品で現場に運ばれ、現場で組み立てられるので、取付位置の間違いがあると、作業を中断して取付位置の修正を行わなければならず、全体の作業工程に対する影響が大きいが、本実施形態によると、簡単且つ確実に垂直補剛材3や水平補剛材4の取付位置の間違いを抽出することができるので、現場での取付位置の修正が確実に防止される。 If the welded structure is a large plate girder block 1 of 10 m or more as in the present embodiment, the final product after the welding process is transported to the site and assembled at the site. Therefore, if there is an error in the mounting position, the work is performed. It is necessary to interrupt and correct the mounting position, which has a large effect on the entire work process. However, according to the present embodiment, the mounting position of the vertical stiffener 3 and the horizontal stiffener 4 is easily and surely determined. Since mistakes can be extracted, correction of the mounting position in the field is surely prevented.

したがって、本実施形態に係る部材取付位置の確認方法によると、少ない人数で簡単且つ確実に部品が正しい位置に取り付けられているかを確認できる。 Therefore, according to the method for confirming the member mounting position according to the present embodiment, it is possible to easily and surely confirm whether or not the parts are mounted at the correct positions with a small number of people.

(その他の実施形態)
本発明は、上記実施形態について、以下のような構成としてもよい。
(Other embodiments)
The present invention may have the following configuration with respect to the above embodiment.

すなわち、上記実施形態では、溶接構造物として大型の鈑桁ブロック1について説明したが、これに限定されず、橋梁箱桁等の他の大型溶接構造物にも適用できる。 That is, in the above embodiment, the large plate girder block 1 has been described as the welded structure, but the present invention is not limited to this, and can be applied to other large welded structures such as bridge box girders.

なお、以上の実施形態は、本質的に好ましい例示であって、本発明、その適用物や用途の範囲を制限することを意図するものではない。 It should be noted that the above embodiments are essentially preferable examples, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, its applications and applications.

1 鈑桁ブロック
2 鈑桁本体
3 垂直補剛材(取付部材)
4 水平補剛材
5 罫書き指示
6 山の頂点
10 3Dスキャナー(三次元形状計測器)
11 無線LANルーター
12 パソコン(コンピュータ/記憶装置)
13 サーバ(記憶装置)
14 表示部
1 plate girder block
2 Plate girder body
3 Vertical stiffener (mounting member)
4 Horizontal stiffener
5 Rule writing instruction
6 mountain peaks
10 3D scanner (3D shape measuring instrument)
11 Wireless LAN router
12 Personal computer (computer / storage device)
13 Server (storage device)
14 Display

Claims (4)

溶接構造物における取付部材の取付位置を確認する部材取付位置の確認方法において、
溶接構造物の三次元設計形状を予め記憶装置に記憶させる設計形状記憶工程と、
上記取付部材が取り付けられた本溶接前の上記溶接構造物を載置する溶接構造物載置工程と、
上記溶接構造物の形状を撮像可能な位置に三次元形状計測器を配置する計測器配置工程と、
上記三次元形状計測器を用いて上記溶接構造物の形状を計測して送信する三次元形状計測工程と、
コンピュータによって上記三次元形状計測器で計測された三次元計測形状と、予め記憶された三次元設計形状とを比較し、上記取付部材の板厚方向における取付位置の相違の有無を抽出する相違点抽出工程と、
上記コンピュータによって相違点が抽出された取付部材を表示部に視覚的に明示する相違点明示工程と、
表示部に明示された相違点のうち、取付部材の取付位置を変更する必要があるか否かを判定する取付位置修正有無判断工程と、
取付位置の変更が必要と判断された取付部材を上記三次元設計形状と同一の正しい位置に取り付け直す取付位置修正実行工程とを含む
ことを特徴とする部材取付位置の確認方法。
In the method of confirming the member mounting position for confirming the mounting position of the mounting member in the welded structure,
A design shape storage process that stores the three-dimensional design shape of the welded structure in a storage device in advance,
The welded structure mounting process for mounting the welded structure before the main welding to which the mounting member is attached, and
The measuring instrument placement process of arranging the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument at a position where the shape of the welded structure can be imaged,
The three-dimensional shape measurement process of measuring and transmitting the shape of the welded structure using the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument, and
Differences in which the three-dimensional measurement shape measured by the three-dimensional shape measuring instrument by a computer is compared with the three-dimensional design shape stored in advance, and the presence or absence of a difference in the mounting position in the plate thickness direction of the mounting member is extracted. Extraction process and
The difference specification step of visually indicating the mounting member whose difference has been extracted by the above computer on the display unit, and
Among the differences specified on the display unit, the mounting position correction presence / absence determination process for determining whether or not the mounting position of the mounting member needs to be changed, and
A method for confirming a member mounting position, which comprises a mounting position correction execution step of remounting a mounting member determined to need to be changed in the mounting position to the same correct position as the above three-dimensional design shape.
請求項1に記載の部材取付位置の確認方法において、
上記三次元設計形状は、上記取付部材の本溶接の前の自重による撓み及び溶接による縮み代を考慮した形状である
ことを特徴とする部材取付位置の確認方法。
In the method for confirming the member mounting position according to claim 1,
The three-dimensional design shape is a method for confirming a member mounting position, which is characterized in that the shape considers bending due to its own weight before main welding of the mounting member and shrinkage allowance due to welding.
請求項1又は2に記載の部材取付位置の確認方法において、
上記溶接構造物は、橋桁の一部を構成する鈑桁ブロックであり、
上記取付部材は、上記鈑桁ブロックに位置決めされた本溶接前の鋼板である
ことを特徴とする部材取付位置の確認方法。
In the method for confirming the member mounting position according to claim 1 or 2,
The welded structure is a plate girder block that forms part of the bridge girder.
A method for confirming a member mounting position, wherein the mounting member is a steel plate before main welding positioned on the plate girder block.
請求項3に記載の部材取付位置の確認方法において、
上記溶接構造物は、長さ10m以上の大型溶接構造物である
ことを特徴とする部材取付位置の確認方法。
In the method for confirming the member mounting position according to claim 3,
A method for confirming a member mounting position, wherein the welded structure is a large welded structure having a length of 10 m or more.
JP2019079137A 2019-04-18 2019-04-18 How to check the member mounting position Active JP6824322B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019079137A JP6824322B2 (en) 2019-04-18 2019-04-18 How to check the member mounting position

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019079137A JP6824322B2 (en) 2019-04-18 2019-04-18 How to check the member mounting position

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020176912A JP2020176912A (en) 2020-10-29
JP6824322B2 true JP6824322B2 (en) 2021-02-03

Family

ID=72935526

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019079137A Active JP6824322B2 (en) 2019-04-18 2019-04-18 How to check the member mounting position

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6824322B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3284760B2 (en) * 1994-06-09 2002-05-20 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Support system for correction process of production equipment
JP2008106541A (en) * 2006-10-26 2008-05-08 Ihi Corp Method of evaluating shape of assembly member, and method of evaluating shape of assembly member after assembly
JP6015400B2 (en) * 2012-12-06 2016-10-26 株式会社Ihi Weld positioning method for welding member, welding member adjusting device used in the welding positioning method, and welding positioning device for welding member
JP2017068849A (en) * 2015-10-01 2017-04-06 株式会社巴コーポレーション Article assembling status information display device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020176912A (en) 2020-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4450775B2 (en) Hull block mounting method and hull block mounting simulation system usable in the method
JP4442661B2 (en) 3D measuring method and 3D measuring apparatus
KR101143292B1 (en) Shaft curve calculation system of turbine rotor
US11105615B2 (en) Deformation processing support system and deformation processing support method
EP3370035B1 (en) Gap measurement device and gap measurement method
EP1642692B1 (en) Robot program generating device and robot program analyzing device
JP6824322B2 (en) How to check the member mounting position
US6661930B1 (en) Method for nesting a computer model of a part with a computer model of a fixture
KR101220819B1 (en) Inspecting method of welding point
CN116972754A (en) Method and system for detecting welding seam of steel bar
KR102191401B1 (en) Virtual Inspection Method for Loading Container, Virtual Inspection System for Loading Container and Method for Repairing Ship
JP6660732B2 (en) Steel frame measurement system, method and program
KR101777615B1 (en) Method for calculating lifting lug position for bell mouth
JP2006088160A (en) Apparatus and program for inspecting welded position
JP5321357B2 (en) Three-dimensional shape data processing apparatus, three-dimensional shape data processing system, and three-dimensional shape measurement system
JP7169168B2 (en) Structure manufacturing method
JP2017004170A (en) Assembling facility inspection method
JP4604681B2 (en) Column building error measurement method, column beam building method, column beam building error measurement system, column beam building evaluation system.
CN112805532B (en) Method and device for analyzing curl of optical film
JP6689927B2 (en) Beam through hole placement determination program and beam through hole placement method
KR101748582B1 (en) Straight degree inspection apparatus and method for probe pin
JP5685788B2 (en) Building accuracy calculation device and building accuracy calculation method
JP4052213B2 (en) Three-dimensional workpiece evaluation apparatus and method
JP7438001B2 (en) Measuring device, measuring system, measuring method and program
JP5798698B1 (en) Intersection identification system for structural members, intersection identification method, and angle measuring instrument

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A80 Written request to apply exceptions to lack of novelty of invention

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A80

Effective date: 20190508

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20200114

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20201222

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20210112

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6824322

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250