JP6742039B1 - Organization development support device and organization development support program for supporting organization development - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an organization development support device for supporting permeation of a corporate philosophy to members. SOLUTION: An organization development support device has a self-evaluated evaluation value of understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy of a plurality of organizational members, and a purpose and a direction of a company having correlation with the understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy. Input section to enter the evaluation value that self-evaluates the category of corporate vision that means understanding of gender, the category of hierarchical relations within the organization and the category of collaboration between organizations, and the satisfaction of multiple element items belonging to the category of engagement And an operation unit that performs multivariate analysis of an operation expression that expresses the objective variable as a function of the explanatory variable, with the self-evaluation of understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy as the objective variable, and other self-evaluations as the explanatory variables. Select a predetermined number of coefficients from the order of increasing absolute value or positive number from each coefficient of the formula, and output the extracted element item and the priority element extraction unit that extracts the element item corresponding to the explanatory variable having the coefficient And an output unit for [Selection diagram] Figure 2

Description

The present invention relates to an organization development support device and an organization development support program that support organization development.

Conventionally, as an organizational development support system, for example, there is one described in Patent Document 1.

This organizational development support system obtains scores about expectation and satisfaction from the responses of multiple members to multiple survey questions, calculates the score indicating the overall motivation of the members using those as parameters, and outputs it. It had a feature in doing.

In addition, the analysis device for the occupational stress survey described in Patent Document 2 uses a plurality of self-evaluations corresponding to a plurality of self-evaluation items regarding the work of the surveyee as a plurality of explanatory variables to satisfy work and life. A self-assessed one is used as an objective variable, and a plurality of explanatory variables and an objective variable are input for each of a plurality of surveyed persons belonging to a certain population. Then, by calculating the relationship between the objective variable and the explanatory variable for a plurality of surveyed persons belonging to the population by multivariate analysis, the coefficient in each of the plurality of explanatory variables and the P-value (significant Probability) was calculated, and the larger one of the plurality of coefficients obtained by the calculation and its P-value were displayed as the characteristics of the population.

Patent Publication 2018-18152 Patent Publication No. 2018-136624

However, in the configuration described in Patent Document 1 of the above-mentioned conventional example, the purpose is to maintain/improve the motivation of the members of the organization, and an index is a variable that can have different types of expectations and satisfaction for each member. Therefore, there is a problem that measures to meet various requirements are required, and it is a great burden for an organization to formulate and execute measures to satisfy all members.

Further, in the configuration described in Patent Document 2, the items that affect the stress of the members of the organization are objectively analyzed, and the organization to which the members belong improves to improve the sales. There was a problem that it was not possible to derive the items that should be.

On the other hand, there is a correlation between the improvement of corporate sales and the degree of penetration of corporate philosophy to its members, and the research paper (Reitaku International Journal of It was also reported in "Economics Study Vol.18, No.1, March 2010", and the improvement of the performance of the organizational members leads to the improvement of the sales of the company.

However, in order to spread the corporate philosophy, it is necessary to observe the target companies from various viewpoints, analyze the factors for each company with different industries, scales, and climates, and take effective measures. there were.

The present invention is made in order to solve the above-mentioned conventional problems, and its purpose is to extract elements that enhance the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy into the members, which strongly affects the sales of the company. The purpose of the present invention is to provide an organizational development support device capable of presenting measures for strengthening it and adaptable to various organizations having different industries, sizes of organizations, and climates.

The corporate philosophy is a basic idea that the founders and managers of a company have in corporate management, and has the same meaning as the corporate philosophy, mission, and company motto. It also includes what is used in the term "vision" as a vision based on this corporate philosophy.

An organization development support apparatus according to the present invention which solves the above-mentioned conventional problems is an apparatus for supporting the performance improvement of an organization composed of a plurality of persons, in which a plurality of organization members understand the corporate philosophy and have mutual sensitivity. Self-assessed the evaluation value of self-assessment and the degree of comprehension of multiple items belonging to the category of the corporate vision, which means the understanding of the company's purpose and the direction toward which it relates , which correlates with the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy. And the evaluation value that self-assessed the strength of multiple items belonging to the category of hierarchical relations within the organization and cooperation between organizations, which also correlates with the understanding and mutual sensitivity of the corporate philosophy, and the same corporate philosophy. Understanding and co-sensitivity, the input part for inputting the evaluation value that self-evaluates the satisfaction of multiple items belonging to the category of engagement, and the understanding and co-sensitivity of the corporate philosophy input from the input part. An arithmetic unit that performs multivariate analysis of an arithmetic expression that expresses the objective variable as a function of the explanatory variable, with the self-evaluation as the objective variable and other self-evaluations as the explanatory variables, and each coefficient of the arithmetic expression calculated by the arithmetic unit Of the absolute value or the positive number, a predetermined number of coefficients are selected, and a priority element extraction unit that extracts an element item corresponding to an explanatory variable that has the coefficient as a coefficient of an arithmetic expression and a priority element extraction unit and an output unit for notifying the extracted element item, element item according to any of the evaluation value to be input to the input section, you characterized in that an element item correlated with the understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy ..

As a result, it is possible to extract the element items that have a great influence on the understanding of the corporate philosophy and the empathy of the surveyed company. Further, since the self-evaluation results of the members of the surveyed company are used, it can be applied to various companies.

Further, the operation unit of the organizational development support apparatus according to the present invention calculates the correlation coefficient between the objective variable and the explanatory variable using the evaluation value input from the input unit, and the value becomes an explanatory variable of a predetermined value or more. Multivariate analysis of arithmetic expressions expressed by limited ones.
As a result, it is possible to reduce the calculation amount of the multivariate analysis without substantially reducing the correlation coefficient between the objective variable and the function of the explanatory variable.

Further, the calculation unit of the organization development support apparatus according to the present invention uses the evaluation value of the explanatory variable corresponding to the priority element item and the evaluation value of the other explanatory variables to explain the explanatory variable corresponding to the priority element item and other The correlation coefficient with the explanatory variable is calculated, and the emphasis element extraction unit extracts the explanatory variable for which the correlation coefficient is the maximum, and the output unit displays the element item corresponding to the newly extracted explanatory variable. Further output as priority element items.

As a result, the element items that have a high correlation with the element items that have a high impact on the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy of the surveyed company are also extracted, so the extraction accuracy of the elements that have a high impact is improved. be able to.

Further, the organizational development support apparatus according to the present invention is an action plan storage unit that stores action plan information for improving the evaluation value for each element item, and the most important element item from all extracted important element items. And an action plan selection unit that reads out action plan information corresponding to the most important element item from the action plan storage unit.

This makes it possible to provide an action plan that is most effective in increasing the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy of the surveyed company.

Further, the arithmetic expression used by the arithmetic unit of the organizational development support apparatus according to the present invention is a regression equation for performing multiple regression analysis, and the coefficient is a partial regression coefficient.

As a result, the partial regression coefficient can be accurately calculated for any number of explanatory variables, so that the priority element item can be correctly extracted.

Further, the computing unit of the organizational development support apparatus according to the present invention receives the designation of the hierarchy of the organization to be evaluated, and the average value of the evaluation values of the designated hierarchy for the priority element item and the rank lower than the average value. The difference between the evaluation value of all members and the average value is calculated, and the action plan selection unit reads the action plan information corresponding to the priority element item with the maximum difference from the action plan storage unit, and the output unit selects the action. Output plan information.

As a result, the designated leader layer members receive an action plan that strengthens the element items that have a large discrepancy with the members of the lower layer, and thus the management ability of the leader layer can be expected to be strengthened. By strengthening the management ability of this leader layer, the corporate philosophy will be permeated to the members of the hierarchy below the leader layer.

In addition, the operation unit of the organization development support apparatus according to the present invention receives the designation of the hierarchy and division of the job system to be evaluated, and all the configurations lower than the designated hierarchy of the designated division regarding the priority element items Calculate the difference between the average evaluation value of all members and the average evaluation value of all members below the designated hierarchy in all departments, and the action plan selection section will focus on the key element that has the maximum difference. The action plan information corresponding to the item is read from the action plan storage unit, and the output unit outputs the action plan information.

As a result, the members of the designated leader hierarchy in the designated department will receive an action plan to strengthen the factors that cause the largest discrepancy in the evaluation values between the department and the company, which will strengthen the management ability of the leaders. Can be expected. By strengthening the management ability of this leader layer, the corporate philosophy will be permeated to the members of the hierarchy below the leader layer.

According to the present invention, it becomes possible for various companies to permeate members of the corporate philosophy, and it is expected that the sales of the companies will be improved.

System configuration diagram showing a configuration of an organization development support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention Block diagram for explaining the function of the organization development support apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention Flowchart explaining the operation of the organization development support apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention Flowchart explaining the analysis processing of the organization development support apparatus in the first embodiment of the present invention The figure which shows the hardware constitutions of the server of the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention. The figure which shows a part of questionnaire information memorize|stored in the database of the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention. The figure which shows the company-wide report which the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention outputs. The figure which shows the deviation status report of the specific hierarchy and the hierarchy directly under which the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention outputs. The figure which shows the deviation status report of the specific department and company-wide average which the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention outputs. The figure which shows a part of action plan information memorize|stored in the action plan memory|storage part of the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention. Block diagram for explaining the function of the organization development support apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating an analysis process of the organization development support device according to the second embodiment of the present invention. The figure which shows the table which put together the priority element list memorize|stored in the analysis result memory|storage part of the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 2 of this invention, and the strength determination result of organization. The figure which shows the ranking report of the strengths and weaknesses of the organization which the organization development support apparatus in Embodiment 2 of this invention outputs. Diagnostic diagram of multiple regression analysis performed by the organization development support device of the present invention

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
(Embodiment 1)

FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram showing a configuration of an organization development support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

In FIG. 1, the organization development support system is composed of an organization development support apparatus 101, a plurality of user communication terminals 103, and a communication network 102 connecting them, and between the organization development support apparatus 101 and the user communication terminals 103. Two-way communication is performed.

The organization development support apparatus 101 is composed of a server 104 and a database 105, and is also connected to a terminal 106 by LAN. The server 104 has a firewall function, but a configuration in which a router connects the communication network 102 and the LAN 107 and the router has a firewall function is also possible.

The server 104 is, for example, the computer shown in FIG. In FIG. 5, the server 104 has a CPU 501, a memory 502, a non-volatile storage unit 503, an input/output interface 504, a first network interface 505, and a second network interface 506. The memory 502 is a semiconductor memory and is a volatile memory capable of reading and writing at high speed. The non-volatile storage unit 503 is a hard disk device and stores programs that realize various functions described below. The CPU 501 reads these programs from the non-volatile storage unit 503, expands them in the memory 502, and executes the programs. A monitor and a keyboard are connected to the input/output interface 504. The first network interface 505 is connected to the network 102, which is the Internet, and the second network interface 506 is connected to the LAN 107.

The database 105 is a large-capacity storage device having a RAID structure and stores user information, questionnaire survey information, and various action plans for organizational development. The database 105 also reads and writes various information in the storage device in response to a request from the server 104.

The terminal 106 is a computer equipped with a network interface, and a consultant who is an expert in organizational development support can add or update the action plans stored in the database 105 or respond to inquiries from the user terminal 103 by using this terminal. The reply from 106 is sent to the user terminal 103.

Next, an outline of the operation of the organization development support system in this embodiment will be described.

First, when the user communication terminal 103 accesses the server 104 of the organizational development support apparatus 101, the server 104 reads the user information from the database 105 and authenticates the user who is the access source. After that, the server 104 reads out predetermined questionnaire survey information from the database 105 and transmits it to the user communication terminal 103 of the access source. After that, when the server 104 receives the reply information to the questionnaire from the user communication terminal 103, the questionnaire reply information is aggregated and analyzed, the user information in the database 105 is updated, and the analysis result is sent to the user communication terminal 103 and the consultant communication terminal. To send. Further, the server 104 reads out an action plan according to the analysis result from the database 105 and transmits the action plan to the user communication terminal 103 or the consultant communication terminal.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram for explaining the functional configuration of the development support apparatus 101.

In FIG. 2, the input unit 201 receives from the user communication terminal 103 user information, a questionnaire execution request for receiving the organizational development support service, and reply information which is a self-evaluation to the questionnaire.

The output unit 209 receives information from the control unit 202 and the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 and transmits information to the user communication terminal 103 and the consultant communication terminal 106.

The user information storage unit 210 stores user information. This user information consists of a company ID that identifies the company, the name of the user's employee, the PIN code, the name of the organization to which the user belongs, the position and the authentication code, and is the basic item of data analysis.

The questionnaire information storage unit 211 stores questionnaire information in which questions about the survey target person are described. This questionnaire information is based on the results of various questionnaire surveys conducted by the inventor Mitsuhiro Ikeda on the organization of a company, which has approximately 238,000 employees in 2,906 companies in 24 industries. This is a set of questions that are extracted for each element that affects the. This extraction consists of a self-assessment value that indicates the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy regarding the results of the questionnaire conducted in the pre-survey, and a self-assessment value of the surveyee for multiple questions that are important in organizational development. The correlation coefficient was calculated, and it was determined whether the question had an absolute value of the correlation coefficient exceeding a predetermined numerical value (0.2).

FIG. 6 shows a part of the questionnaire information stored in the questionnaire information storage unit 211 according to this embodiment.

In FIG. 6, categories are classifications of important elements in organizational development, and they are three categories: a vision category, a relation category, and an engagement category.

The element item defines each of the above elements.

Element No. Is an identification number given to the element and has a one-to-one correspondence with the element item or question.

First, the elements that belong to the vision category are the elements that measure the understanding of the company's purpose and the direction in which it aims, and the elements of the domain such as understanding of the ideal strategy (for example, “Understanding and empathizing with the idea” of element No. 1) and Elements in the domain of understanding the foundation of company management (for example, "Stability of customer base" in element No. 7) and elements in the domain of understanding the external environment (for example, "Understanding customer needs" in element No. 10), etc. Is. The question is for evaluating the comprehension level of each element. The first question, "Do you understand the management policy of the company and the significance of existence of the company?" evaluates the degree of understanding of the corporate philosophy and empathy of the target person who receives this question.

Next, the elements belonging to the relationship category are elements that measure the relationship strength of the organization such as the hierarchical relationship within the organization and the goodness of cooperation between the organizations, and the element in the area such as the boss relationship (for example, “direct report of element No. 18”). Elements in areas such as “communication with boss” and behavior evaluation (eg, “listening attitude of opinion” in element No. 23) and areas in areas such as human resource understanding (eg, grasping the strengths and characteristics of members in element No. 26) )) and organizational elements such as organizational relations (for example, “Mutual respect of element No. 32”). The question is for evaluating the comprehension level of each element. The 18th question, "Is communication with your direct supervisor smooth?" evaluates the degree of communication between the subject who receives this question and your direct supervisor.

Next, the elements belonging to the engagement category are elements that measure engagement satisfaction such as employee attachment to the company or work, and elements in the area such as work content (for example, “No. 40 “Contribution to customers and society”). Elements of the area such as "mind", "impact on society" of element No. 42) and performance (for example, "real feeling of self-growth" of element No. 45) and elements of areas such as the work environment (for example of element No. 48). "Challenge environment"). The question is for evaluating the comprehension level of each element. Forty questions, "Do you want to contribute to society and customers?" evaluates the engagement satisfaction of the people who receive this question.

The questionnaire answer storage unit 212 stores questionnaire answer information, which is the answer to the questionnaire by the surveyee. This questionnaire response information is a self-evaluation of the answers to each question in seven levels, with the highest evaluation being "7" and the lowest evaluation being "1". These questionnaire response information are stored in association with the user information.

The user authentication unit 203 authenticates the access from the surveyed person in order to receive the organizational development support service, and the authentication code and the like input by the user who has accessed and the user information registered in the user information storage unit 210. Match with.

The questionnaire result analysis unit 204 uses an operation unit 205 and an important factor extraction unit 206, which will be described below, to find an element that has a great influence on the penetration of the corporate philosophy.

In the present embodiment, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 sets the self-evaluation to the question (element No. 1) about the degree of comprehension and empathy of the corporate philosophy, which is one element of the vision category, as the objective variable. Multivariate analysis was performed on the questionnaire response information from the users of the user company and all employees, using the self-assessment for the questions of other elements and the questions of all elements of other categories as explanatory variables, and the effect on the objective variables was large. List the explanatory variables. In this embodiment, multiple regression analysis is performed as multivariate analysis.

The calculation unit 205 calculates the partial regression coefficient of the multiple regression equation shown in Formula 1, calculates the deviation value of the self-evaluation value and the average value for each department, and calculates the difference between the hierarchies having different job structures and the difference between departments. Is calculated.

This multiple regression equation regresses the objective variable y with a plurality of explanatory variables x1, x2,..., Xk, and partial regression coefficients a1,. There is. That is, the weight for each explanatory variable when the correlation coefficient between the objective variable and the right side of the multiple regression equation is maximum is shown. Therefore, it can be said that maximizing the explanatory variable having a large weight is the most effective in increasing the objective variable.

The calculation unit 205 calculates the intercept and partial regression coefficient of Expression 1 by a known calculation formula, with the objective variable passed from the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 as y and the explanatory variable as xi.

The calculation unit 205 also calculates a correlation coefficient between variables. The correlation coefficient is expressed by Equation 2, and is calculated from the standard deviations of the variables xi and xj and the covariance of the variables xi and xj.

The priority element extraction unit 206 extracts a predetermined number of explanatory variables from the partial regression coefficients having a large positive value among the partial regression coefficients calculated by the calculation unit 205, and has a large influence on the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy (objective variable y). It creates a list of elements.

The report creating unit 207 creates analysis result information for notifying the user communication terminal 103 or the terminal 106 of these analysis results.

The analysis result storage unit 213 stores the analysis result information.

The action plan storage unit 214 stores an action plan that is a measure for increasing the self-evaluation value for every element.

FIG. 10 shows a part of the action plan information stored in the action plan storage unit 214 in this embodiment.

In FIG. 10, one or two or more action plans are registered for each element item.

The action plan selection unit 208 selects an action plan corresponding to the element from the action plan storage unit 214 based on the analysis result information.

The control unit 202 controls the entire organization development support device in order to provide the organization development support service.

Each of the above functions is realized by each process when the CPU executes the program stored in the nonvolatile storage unit 503 described above. That is, the input unit 201 realizes the input process, and the output unit 209 realizes the output process. Further, the user authentication unit 203 realizes a user authentication process, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 realizes a questionnaire result analysis process, the calculation unit 205 realizes a calculation process, and the priority element extraction unit 206 realizes a priority element extraction process. The report creating unit 207 implements the report creating process, the action plan selecting unit 208 implements the action plan selecting process, and the control unit 202 implements the control process.

The operation and action of the organizational development support apparatus configured as described above will be described below.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the organization development support device.

First, when the input unit 201 receives an access from the user communication terminal 103, the control unit 202 instructs the user authentication unit 203 to perform an authentication check on the user of the source user communication terminal 103.

Upon receiving this, the user authentication unit 203 determines whether or not the user information and the authentication code transmitted from the user communication terminal 103 match those registered in the user information storage unit 210 in advance (step S301), If they do not match, a request for transmission is sent to the output unit 209 to reject access, and the output unit 209 sends a reply to the user communication terminal 103 that is the transmission source (step S302).

Next, if the user authentication is OK, the control unit 202 determines whether or not the request from the user communication terminal 103 requests the transmission of a questionnaire for receiving the organizational development support (step S303), If the request is a questionnaire transmission request, the questionnaire information is read from the questionnaire information storage unit 211 and the output unit 209 is requested to transmit it. In response to this, the output unit 209 transmits the questionnaire information to the request source user communication terminal 103 (step S304). After that, the control unit 2020 ends the post-authentication processing of the user communication terminal 103, and waits again for a notification from the input unit.

On the other hand, when the request from the user communication terminal 103 is not the questionnaire transmission request, the control unit 202 determines whether the request is a questionnaire response information reception request (step S305). Then, when the request is to receive the questionnaire reply information, the control unit 202 stores the received questionnaire reply information in the questionnaire reply storage unit 212 (step S306). After that, the control unit 202 ends the post-authentication processing of the user communication terminal 103, and waits again for a notification from the input unit.

When the request is not the reception request, the control unit 202 determines whether the request from the user communication terminal 103 requests the questionnaire analysis result (step S307), and requests the questionnaire analysis result. In this case, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 is instructed to analyze the questionnaire response information.

On the other hand, if the questionnaire analysis result is not requested, the control unit 202 ends the post-authentication processing of the user communication terminal 103, and waits again for a notification from the input unit.

Upon receiving the request from the control unit 202, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 reads out the questionnaire response information of all the survey target persons of the requesting user company from the questionnaire response storage unit 212 (step S308), and uses the calculation unit 205. Analysis processing is performed (step S309).

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating this analysis processing.

First, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 uses the calculation unit 205 as the objective variable as a self-evaluation for the question about the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy, and the explanatory variable as a self-evaluation for all other questions using the arithmetic unit 205. I do.

That is, the self-evaluation values of the objective variables and the explanatory variables of all the surveyed persons are set as arguments to the calculation unit 205 in a multiple regression analysis processing program that calculates a known partial regression coefficient, and the intercept a0 and the partial deviation represented by Equation 1 are calculated. The regression coefficients a1, a2,... Ak are calculated (step S401).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 instructs the priority element extraction unit 205 to extract a predetermined number from the partial regression coefficients calculated as a positive number that is larger.

Upon receiving this, the priority element extraction unit 205 rearranges the calculated partial regression coefficients in ascending order, and extracts a predetermined number from the largest positive regression number. Then, the explanatory variables having the extracted partial regression coefficient as a coefficient are ranked, and a ranking list of element items corresponding to the explanatory variable is created (step S402).

As described above, since the partial regression coefficient indicates the weight, the created ranking list shows the higher-order elements that influence the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy of the surveyed companies at the company level.
When the processing of step S402 is shown as a specific example, when the partial regression coefficient calculation result is as follows,
a40>a48>a23>a26>a10>... >0>...
The emphasis element extraction unit 205 extracts, for example, the fifth partial regression variable a10 counted from the maximum value a40, and the explanatory variables having the coefficients as the coefficients, that is, x40, x48, x23, x26, and x10 are respectively the first rank, The second item is ranked as the fifth item, and the element item corresponding to each explanatory variable, that is, the element number. 40, element number. 48, element number. 23, element number. 26, element number. 10 is ranked first, second,..., Fifth, respectively, and a ranking list is created.

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 calculates the correlation coefficient with each other element for each of the extracted upper elements by using the operation unit 205 in order to obtain the element highly correlated with the extracted upper element. To do.

That is, for each extracted upper element, in order to obtain the correlation coefficient with the other elements, the self-evaluation value of the upper explanatory variables extracted from the response information of all the surveyed persons and the other explanatory variables The self-evaluation value of 1 is set as an argument to the arithmetic unit 205 in the correlation coefficient calculation program represented by Expression 2 to calculate the correlation coefficient. This process is performed for all extracted upper explanatory variables (elements) (step S403).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 associates the element item corresponding to the explanatory variable having the largest calculated correlation coefficient with the upper-ranked element item. In this way, the priority element list is created (step S404).
When the processing of steps S403 and S404 is shown as a continuation of the specific example of step S402, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 uses the correlation coefficient between the first explanatory variable x40 and the other explanatory variables using Equation 2. To calculate. As a result, when the correlation coefficient with the explanatory variable x42 becomes maximum, the element No. corresponding to the explanatory variable x40. 40 and the element number corresponding to the explanatory variable x42. Associate 42. Similarly, for the explanatory variables x48, x23, x26, and x10, correlation coefficients with other explanatory variables are calculated, and the maximum explanatory variables are, for example, x45, x18, x32, and x7, respectively. Element No., which is the element corresponding to the variable. 45 is the element number. 48 in the element number. 18 is the element number. 23, the element No. 32 is the element number. 26, the element No. 7 is the element number. Associate with 10.

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 uses the calculation unit 205 for each of the elements associated with the high-impact high-order elements obtained in step S402 and step S403, using the operation unit 205 The average value of the self-evaluation values of is calculated (step S405).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 uses the calculation unit 205 to determine the element number. From the self-evaluation values of all the surveyed persons for the question of understanding and empathy of the idea of No. 1, calculate the average value of this user company at the company level and the average value for each department/department. Then, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 compares these average values with the number of employees of approximately 238,000 employees in 24 industries and 2,906 companies, which have been previously stored and are implemented by the inventor Mitsuhiro Ikeda. The deviation value at the company level or the deviation value at the department/department level of the user company is calculated from the average value of the self-evaluation values for the same question for each company. These represent the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy at the company level or department/department level of the user company (step S406).

The above is the questionnaire analysis process (step S309) performed by the questionnaire result analysis unit 204.

Then, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 stores the analysis result calculated in step S309 in the analysis result storage unit 213 (step S310) and notifies the control unit 202 of the end of the analysis process.

In response to this, the control unit 202 instructs the report creation unit 207 to create a report.

The report creating unit 207 creates the report requested by the user communication terminal 103 using the analysis result (step S311). At this time, the analysis result request regarding the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy from the user communication terminal 103 can be a company-wide level of the user company, a specific hierarchy of the employee system, a specific department, a specific department, or the like. Is.

For example, in the case of a report request designating a general manager position at the company-wide level, the report creating unit 207, for each element item of the priority element list extracted in the questionnaire analysis process (step S309), does not exceed all survey target persons and section manager positions. The average value of the self-evaluation points of all the employees and the general manager position is extracted from the analysis result storage unit 213 to create a report.

FIG. 7 is a company-level report targeting general managers of factors that have a large effect on the penetration of the corporate philosophy at the company-wide level of this user company.

7, the element number. The columns are the priority elements extracted from the above-mentioned priority element extraction unit in descending order of influence (weight), from the first to the fifth, and the related element columns are the elements having a large correlation with those elements, respectively. “Everyone” in the evaluation average value column indicates the self-evaluation average value of all employees, “employee” indicates the self-evaluation average value of all employees below the manager in this example, and “manager” indicates in this example The average value of the self-evaluation of the hierarchy of managers is shown.

In addition, when the report creation unit 207 is requested by designating a general manager position of a specific department, each of the elements of the priority element list extracted in the questionnaire analysis process (step S309) is less than or equal to the section manager position of the specified department. An average value of self-evaluation values of all employees and general managers is extracted from the analysis result storage unit 213 to create a report.

FIG. 8 is an occupational hierarchy divergence report showing the degree of divergence in the self-evaluation value between the tiers of the job system in a specific department of the user company.

8, the element number. In the column, the elements from the first to the fifth, which have a high influence on the penetration of the corporate philosophy, and the related elements are arranged vertically. In addition, in the evaluation average value column, the target manager is described as a direct manager, and employees in a lower hierarchy than that are described as employees. Then, in the evaluation average value column, the average value of self-evaluation for the question of each priority element item of the employee, the average value of self-evaluation of all direct managers, and the deviation value which is the difference between the two are shown.

Further, when the request is for a report designating a general manager position regarding the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy of a specific department, the report creating unit 207 targets each element item of the priority element list extracted in the questionnaire analysis process (step S309). The average value of the self-evaluation points of all employees below the section manager position and the average value of the self-evaluation points of all employees below the section manager position at the company level are extracted from the analysis result storage unit 213 to create a report.

FIG. 9 is an inter-divisional deviation report showing how much a specific department of the user company deviates from the company-wide average.

9, the element number. In the column, the element numbers from 1st to 5th, which have a high influence on the penetration of the corporate philosophy, are listed. And related elements No. And are arranged vertically. Also, in the evaluation average value column, the average of the self-evaluation values of the employees in the hierarchy lower than the general manager of the target department (indicated as "target department") and the employees in the hierarchy lower than the general manager of all departments The average value of the self-evaluation values (expressed as “company-wide average”) and the deviation value that is the difference between the two are shown.

Further, when the request is for the company-wide report of the user company, the report creation unit 207 reads the penetration level of the company philosophy of the company level from the analysis result storage unit 213 and writes it in the report. In addition, even when a report request is issued from a specific department or department, the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy of the specific department or department is read out from the analysis result storage unit 213 and written in the report. This allows the user company to know the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy compared to many companies. Further, it is possible to know the effect of implementing the action plan described later by comparing the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy before and after implementation.

Next, the report creation unit 207 creates the requested report, stores the report information in the analysis result storage unit 213, and notifies the control unit 202 of the end of the report creation process.

In addition, in the above example, the report is created for the general manager position, but not limited to this, various leader layers such as a section manager position and a group leader can be designated.

Next, the control unit 202 instructs the action plan selection unit 208 to select an action plan.

When the user communication terminal 103 requests the creation of a report on the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy at the company level, the action plan selection unit 208 reads the company level report of FIG. 7 from the analysis result storage unit 213 and lists it. Which of the element numbers is the most important element is determined (step S312). For example, the action plan selection unit determines from the company-wide report (Fig. 7) that the element No. with the lowest self-evaluation average value of the employees (section manager or lower). (The element No. 48 in FIG. 7) is determined to be the most important element, and the element No. 10 is extracted (in FIG. 10, an element No. 48 “provides a place to praise the challenged human resources.” “an open recruitment of employees who entrust a part of daily work”) is performed (step). S313). Then, it requests the output unit 209 to send the action plan to the user communication terminal 103 of the manager (step S314).

In addition, when the report creation request from the user communication terminal 103 specifies a specific job hierarchy of a specific department, the action plan selecting unit 208 separates the job hierarchy of FIG. 8 from the analysis result storage unit 213. The report is read, and it is determined which of the listed element numbers is the most important element (step S312). For example, the action plan selection unit 208 determines from the report of FIG. 8 that the element No. having the largest difference (deviation) in the evaluation average value between the employee and the direct manager. (The element No. 7 in FIG. 8) is determined to be the most important element, and the element No. 10 corresponding to the action plan (in FIG. 10, "Open a strategy meeting for reviewing the value of existing products and services" of element No. 7 "Develop an after-sales service for existing customers (good customers).") (Step S313).

Further, when the report creation request from the user communication terminal 103 specifies a specific department, the action plan selection unit 208 reads the specific department deviation report of FIG. 9 from the analysis result storage unit 213 and lists it. It is determined which of the displayed element numbers is the most important element (step S312). For example, the action plan selecting unit 208 determines that the element No. having the largest difference (deviation) between the evaluation average value of the target department and the evaluation average value of the entire company from the report of FIG. (Element No. 26 in FIG. 9) is determined to be the most important element and the element No. 10 is extracted (in FIG. 10, an element No. 26 “provides an opportunity for members to understand each other's strengths and characteristics (or to create such a mechanism)”) (step S313).

Next, the action plan selection unit requests the output unit 209 to transmit these action plans to the designated user communication terminal 103.

In response to this, the output unit 209 transmits the action plan together with the report to the user communication terminal 103 of the designated manager position (step S314).

As described above, in the present embodiment, the action plan is transmitted to the general manager who is the evaluation target because the cause of the deviation of the priority elements is the general manager who reports directly to the employee (in this example, below the manager). This is because it is considered that there is a lack of management ability in the job hierarchy. The action plan of this most important factor is carried out by the manager who reports directly to the employee and strengthens the management ability, so that the members of the lower hierarchy (employees under the section manager) become more aware of the relevant important factor. It can be expected that the evaluation value will increase. Then, the self-evaluation value of a large element of the degree of influence (weight) is increased, and as a result, the understanding and mutual sensitivity of the corporate philosophy are effectively improved, and the corporate philosophy of the members is permeated. ..

As described above, in the present embodiment, the organizational development support device has a self-evaluated evaluation value of the understanding/sympathy of the corporate philosophy of all employees and a correlation with the understanding/sympathy of the corporate philosophy, It belongs to the category of hierarchical relations within the organization and cooperation between organizations, which is also correlated with the evaluation value that self-evaluates the degree of comprehension of multiple element items belonging to the category of corporate vision, and also with the understanding and mutual sensitivity of the corporate philosophy. User companies have a self-rated evaluation value of the strength of multiple element items and a self-rated evaluation value of the satisfaction level of multiple element items belonging to the category of engagement, which is also correlated with the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy. Then, the calculation unit calculates the partial regression coefficient of the multiple regression equation with the self-evaluation of understanding and sympathy of the received corporate philosophy as the objective variable and the other self-evaluations as explanatory variables. Among the coefficients, a predetermined number of coefficients are selected in order from the largest positive number, the element item corresponding to the explanatory variable having the coefficient is extracted, and the user company is notified. As a result, the user company can know the element items that should be strengthened in order to effectively increase the understanding and mutual sensitivity of the company's corporate philosophy.

Further, in the present embodiment, the organization development support apparatus reads out the action plan for strengthening the most important element items from the action plan storage unit of the organization development support apparatus and presents it to the user company, so that the user company is the employee company. It becomes easy to implement measures to spread the idea.

In this way, it is possible to determine the element items that are effective for increasing the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy, that is, the multiple regression that expresses the relationship between the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy and other factors. This is because the equation is valid, but the regression diagnostic chart is known to show this validity.

FIG. 15 is a regression diagnostic diagram of the multiple regression analysis of the present embodiment created from the answers of the questionnaire survey of the present embodiment to the organization of 20 surveyed persons.

In FIG. 15, the vertical axis represents the self-evaluation value (number from 1 to 7) for the questions about the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy answered by each surveyee, and the self-evaluation value for other questions (from 1 to 7) Is the residual with the predicted value applied to the multiple regression equation obtained in step S401 of FIG. 4, and the horizontal axis shows the predicted value. The black circles in the figure show the relationship between the residual and the predicted value calculated from the self-evaluation values answered by each of the 20 surveyed persons.

As shown in the figure, the residuals are appropriately dispersed for each predicted value, and the range of the residuals is approximately within the range of −0.5 to +0.5.
Therefore, it can be said that the multiple regression equation is appropriate for predicting the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy.

In the present embodiment, the multiple regression analysis, which is one of the multivariate analysis methods, is shown as an example, but the present invention is not limited to this, and other multivariate analysis methods can be used.

Further, in the present embodiment, in the questionnaire analysis process (step S309 in FIG. 3), the company-level ones are extracted based on the self-evaluation of all the employees, but the invention is not limited to this. It is also effective to perform questionnaire analysis processing. This is because the business content and the characteristics of the members are different for each department such as the sales department, the manufacturing department, or the technical department, and thus there may be cases where the priority elements to be strengthened in order to improve the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy are different.

Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the report creating unit 207 creates a report in response to a request from the user communication terminal 103, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, a report as shown in FIGS. It is also possible to create the action plan and select the action plans of the plurality of most important elements extracted from the respective reports by the action plan selecting unit 208, and send the action plans to the members of the job hierarchy to be strengthened.

Further, in the present embodiment, the consultant who is an expert in the organizational development support uses the terminal 106 existing in the local network 107, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the consultant terminal directly connects to the Internet 102 to perform user communication. It is also possible to adopt a configuration in which the inquiry from the terminal 103 is directly answered.

Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the organization development support apparatus has a configuration in which the server and the database are connected by the LAN, but the configuration is not limited to this, and the server and the database can be realized by a single computer.

Further, in the present embodiment, one question is shown corresponding to each element, but the present invention is not limited to this, and it is possible to set a plurality of questions for one element. In this case, the average value of the evaluation values of a plurality of questions is used as the explanatory variable of the multiple regression equation so that the maximum evaluation value of each element is the same.

Further, in the present embodiment, the priority element extraction unit selects the predetermined number of partial regression coefficients from the largest positive number among the partial regression coefficients, but the present invention is not limited to this, and selects from the largest absolute value. It is also possible. In this case, it is also necessary to select a negative element, which is an objective variable (element), in order to improve understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy, but in that case, the self-evaluation value for that element becomes zero. Providing action plans that approach people can improve the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy as a whole efficiently.

(Embodiment 2)
The configuration of the organization development support system and the hardware configuration of the organization development support apparatus of this embodiment are the same as those of the first embodiment, but a part of the functional configuration of the development support apparatus 101 is different.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating the functional configuration of the development support device 101 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

11, the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 indicates that the element number. Perform multiple regression analysis on the questionnaire response information from all of the user companies, using the self-evaluation for the question about the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy of 1 as the objective variable and the self-evaluation for the questions of other factors as the explanatory variable. Is the same as that of the first embodiment, but multiple regression analysis is performed after the number of explanatory variables of multiple regression analysis is narrowed down beforehand, and an element having a high correlation with the extracted priority element is extracted as a related element. It is different from the questionnaire result analysis unit of the first embodiment in that there is no point and that the priority element is classified into the strength and weakness of the company.

Further, the report creating unit 1107 creates the analysis result information for notifying the user communication terminal 103 and the terminal 106 of these analysis results as in the first embodiment, but the extracted priority elements are The difference is that a report is further categorized into strengths and weaknesses.

Next, the operation and action of the organization development support apparatus according to the present embodiment will be described, but the overall operation flow is the same as that of the first embodiment shown in FIG.
Differences from the operation and action of the first embodiment are the questionnaire analysis process (step S309) and the analysis result report creation process (step S311).

FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating the analysis process (step S309) performed by the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 according to the second embodiment.

First, the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 sets the variable 1 (xi) to the self-evaluation for the question about the degree of understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy of all the user companies, and sets the variable 2 (self) to the self-evaluation for all other questions. As xj), the calculation unit 205 is used to calculate the correlation coefficient between the variable 1 and each variable 2 using Equation 2.

That is, the self-evaluation values of the variables 1 and 2 of all the surveyed persons are set in the correlation coefficient calculation program represented by the equation 2 as arguments to the calculation unit 205, and the correlation between the variables 1 and 2 is set. The number of relationships is calculated (step S1201).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 extracts the explanatory variables whose calculated correlation coefficient is a predetermined value, which is 0.6 in this embodiment, but which is more than that value, and further extracts the highest rank among them. Variables 2 to 20 (k is 20 in this embodiment) are selected as explanatory variables for performing the multiple regression analysis (step S1202).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 sets the self-evaluation to the question about the degree of comprehension and empathy of the corporate philosophy as an objective variable, and the objective variable and the variable selected in step S1202 as explanatory variables, and the self-evaluation value of each. When the analysis unit 205 is instructed to analyze by using as an argument, the calculation unit 205 executes a known multiple regression analysis processing program for calculating partial regression coefficients, and the intercept a0 and partial regression coefficients a1, a2,... -Calculate ak (step S1203).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 204 instructs the priority element extraction unit 1106 to extract a predetermined number from the largest positive positive numbers among the partial regression coefficients calculated as in the first embodiment ( Step S1204).

Upon receiving this, the priority element extraction unit 1106 arranges the partial regression coefficients in descending order. Then, partial regression coefficients from the highest ranking to the 10th partial regression coefficient are extracted, and the element item corresponding to the explanatory variable having the coefficient is determined as the priority element item. Then, a rank list is created in which the extracted priority element items are ranked first, second,..., And tenth (step S1205).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 uses the self-evaluation value stored in the analysis result storage unit 213 for the explanatory variable selected in step S1202, in addition to the company-level self-evaluation average value, The self-evaluation average value for each department is calculated using the calculation unit 205 (step S1206).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 determines whether or not the self-evaluation average value of all of the questions for each priority element item is equal to or larger than a predetermined value, and classifies each priority element into the strength or weakness of the organization (step S1207). ).

FIG. 13 is a table summarizing the above-mentioned priority element list and the strength determination result of the organization.

13, the element number. The columns are the priority elements extracted from the above-mentioned priority element extraction unit in descending order of impact (weight) from the 1st to 10th, and the evaluation average value column shows the self-evaluation average value of all employees. The columns show the strengths and weaknesses of the organization of the user company. In addition, S shows a strength and W shows a weakness. Further, in the present embodiment, the evaluation average value of 5.3 or more is determined to be strong, and the evaluation average value of less than that is determined to be weak. Note that this table is stored in the analysis result storage unit 213 in the next analysis result storage process (step S310).

Next, the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 calculates the deviation value at the company level or the deviation value at the department/department level of the user company by the same method as in the first embodiment. These are the penetration levels of the corporate philosophy of the entire company or department/department level of the user company (step S1208).

The above is the questionnaire analysis processing performed by the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 of the present embodiment. As described above, the reason why the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 calculates the correlation coefficient between the objective variable and all the explanatory variables and narrows down the explanatory variables of the multiple regression analysis is the partial regression coefficient of the multiple regression analysis. This is to reduce the amount of calculation required.

Next, the report generation process (step S311) of the analysis result of the present embodiment will be described below.

The report creating unit 1107 creates the report requested by the user communication terminal 103 using the analysis result as in the first embodiment.

Also in the present embodiment, the evaluation average value report between the employees and the managers at the company level as shown in FIGS. 7 to 9 for the elements of the priority element list, and the deviation status between the specific hierarchy and the hierarchy immediately below , Or a report showing the deviation between the specific department and the company-wide average, but there is no related element of the priority element, and all the evaluation average values corresponding to the priority elements listed in the priority element list are used. Is different.

In addition, in the present embodiment, the report creating unit 1107 reads out the degree of penetration of the company-level corporate philosophy from the analysis result storage unit 213 and writes it in the report when a company-level report request of the user company is made. Then, based on the priority element list created by the questionnaire result analysis unit 1104 and a table summarizing the strength determination results of the organization, a report ranking the strengths and weaknesses of the organization is created.

FIG. 14 is an example of this report. In this figure, the degree of penetration of the corporate philosophy is the deviation value at the company-wide level of the user company, and the strength list of the organization is the element No. of the table shown in FIG. 14, element number. 40, element number. 17, element number. 3, element No. 6 is an element item corresponding to element 6, and the weakness list of the organization is the element number. 47, element number. 9, element number. 15, element number. 4, element number. 13 shows the element items corresponding to 13.

Next, the difference between the most important factor determination process (step S312) of the present embodiment and the process of the first embodiment will be described below.

That is, the action plan selection unit 208 according to the first embodiment selects the element No. having the lowest average self-evaluation value of the employee among the priority elements. However, in the present embodiment, among the elements of the weakness list of the organization, the element No. having the lowest self-evaluation average value is determined. Is determined to be the most important factor.

In FIG. 13, the element number. Since the self-evaluation average value of 9 is the lowest than the other weakness list elements, this is determined as the most important element. Then, the action plan selection unit 208 determines that the element number of the element number from the action plan storage unit 211. The output unit is requested to extract the action plan corresponding to and transmit it to the user communication terminal 103 of the manager.

As another determination method, in the strength list of the organization, the highest priority element, that is, the first priority element is determined as the highest priority element. However, if the self-evaluation average value of the explanatory variable corresponding to the priority element is, for example, "6.5" or more, it is not the highest priority element, but it is the second most important element and the self evaluation Those with an average value of less than "6.5" are determined as the most important factors.

In this way, even if the partial regression coefficient is high, the fact that the self-evaluation average value of the explanatory variable is greater than or equal to the predetermined value is not considered as a priority element item. This is because the effect is more likely to be manifested by strengthening the element having a smaller self-evaluation average value than by carrying out.

As described above, in the present embodiment, the organization development support device has a correlation between the evaluation value obtained by self-evaluating the understanding/sympathy of the corporate philosophy from all the user companies and the understanding/sympathy of the corporate philosophy. , The category of the hierarchical relationship within the organization and the cooperation between the organizations, which is correlated with the evaluation value that self-evaluates the degree of understanding of multiple element items belonging to the category of corporate vision, and the understanding and mutual sensitivity of the corporate philosophy. Receives an evaluation value that self-evaluates the strength of multiple element items that belong to it, and an evaluation value that self-evaluates the degree of satisfaction of multiple element items that belong to the category of engagement that also correlates with the understanding and mutual sensitivity of the corporate philosophy. However, since the partial regression coefficient of the multiple regression equation is calculated by focusing on the explanatory variables of the elements that have a large correlation coefficient with the understanding of the corporate philosophy and the self-evaluation of sympathy, the calculation load of the multiple regression analysis is implemented. It can be reduced compared to the case of 1.

Furthermore, since the strengths and weaknesses of the organization are judged from the extracted self-evaluation averages of the priority element items and ranked and reported, the leaders of the user companies can know the problems of their own organization and give priority to them. You can objectively judge the element items to be tackled.

In selecting an action plan, the element with the lowest self-evaluation average value among the elements considered to be the weakness of the organization is determined to be the most important element, or the element ranked as the highest among the elements considered to be the organizational strength. Check if the self-evaluation average value of the explanatory variable that has a partial regression coefficient as a coefficient is sufficiently large. If the self-evaluation average value is sufficiently large, do not consider it as an action plan target, and the self-evaluation average value is not too large. The element item corresponding to the explanatory variable is set as the most important element, and the action plan for this is notified to the user company. As a result, the user company can strengthen the element items that have a high degree of influence on the self-evaluation of understanding and sympathy for the company's corporate philosophy, and that have the capacity to sufficiently enhance the self-evaluation for the element items. ..

In the present embodiment, in the questionnaire analysis process (step S309 in FIG. 3), the company-level ones are extracted based on the self-evaluation of all the employees, but the invention is not limited to this. It is also effective to perform questionnaire analysis processing. This is because the business content and the characteristics of the members are different for each department such as the sales department, the manufacturing department, or the technical department, and thus there may be cases where the priority elements to be strengthened in order to improve the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy are different.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is useful for supporting organizational development, and is suitable for promoting the corporate philosophy to the members, which strongly influences the sales increase of the company.

101 Organizational Development Support Device 102 Communication Network 103 User Communication Terminal 104 Server 105 Database 106 Terminal 107 LAN
201 input unit 202 control unit 203 user authentication unit 204, 1104 questionnaire result analysis unit 205 calculation unit 206, 1106 focus element extraction unit 207, 1107 report creation unit 208 action plan selection unit 209 output unit 210 user information storage unit 211 questionnaire information storage Part 212 Questionnaire answer storage part 213 Analysis result storage part 214 Action plan storage part 501 CPU
502 memory 503 non-volatile storage unit 504 input/output interface 505 first network interface 506 second network interface

Claims (8)

An organization development support device for supporting performance improvement of an organization composed of a plurality of persons,
A number of organizational members self-evaluate their understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy, and an understanding of the company's purpose and direction that correlates with the understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy. Evaluation values that self-evaluate the degree of comprehension of multiple element items belonging to the vision category, as well as multiple Input section to input self-evaluated evaluation value of strength of element item and self-evaluated evaluation value of satisfaction degree of multiple element items belonging to the category of engagement, which also correlates with understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy. When,
A self-evaluation of understanding/sympathy of the corporate philosophy input from the input unit is used as an objective variable, and the other self-assessment is used as an explanatory variable, and a plurality of arithmetic expressions expressing the objective variable as a function of the explanatory variable. A calculation unit that performs random analysis,
The element item corresponding to the explanatory variable that has a predetermined number of coefficients selected in descending order of absolute value or positive number among the coefficients of the arithmetic expression calculated by the arithmetic unit, and has the coefficient as a coefficient of the arithmetic expression And a key element extraction unit for extracting as a key element item,
An output unit for outputting the priority element item ,
The element item according to any of the evaluation value to be input to the input section, the tissue development support apparatus you being a component item correlated with the understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy. The explanatory variable of the arithmetic expression is limited to the explanatory variable whose correlation coefficient between the objective variable and the explanatory variable calculated using the evaluation value input from the input unit is a predetermined value or more. The organization development support device according to claim 1. The calculation unit uses the evaluation value of the explanatory variable corresponding to the priority element item and the evaluation value of the other explanatory variable to describe the explanatory variable corresponding to the priority element item and the other description. Calculate the correlation coefficient with the variable,
The emphasis element extraction unit extracts the explanatory variable having the maximum correlation coefficient, and the output unit further outputs the element item corresponding to the newly extracted explanatory variable as an emphasis element item. The organization development support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein: An action plan storage unit that stores action plan information for improving the evaluation value for each of the element items;
The action plan selecting unit which selects the most important element item from all the extracted important element items and reads out the action plan information corresponding to the most important element item from the action plan storage unit. 3. The organization development support device described in any one of 3. The organizational development support apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the arithmetic expression is a regression expression for performing multiple regression analysis, and the coefficient is a partial regression coefficient. The calculation unit receives a designation of a hierarchy of a job system to be evaluated, and an average value of the evaluation values of the designated hierarchy for the priority element item and an average of the evaluation values of all members below the hierarchy. Calculate the difference from the value,
The action plan selection unit reads the action plan information corresponding to the priority element item having the maximum difference from the action plan storage unit,
The organization development support apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the output unit outputs the action plan information. The calculation unit accepts the designation of the hierarchy and department of the job system to be evaluated, and the average value of the evaluation values of all members below the designated hierarchy of the designated department for the priority element item, , Calculate the difference from the average value of the evaluation values of all members below the designated hierarchy of all departments,
The action plan selection unit reads the action plan information corresponding to the priority element item having the maximum difference from the action plan storage unit,
The organization development support apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the output unit outputs the action plan information. On the computer,
Multiple organizations members are companies which means the evaluation value, which is self-evaluated understanding and sympathy of the corporate philosophy, a correlation with understanding and empathy index of the corporate philosophy, the understanding of the purpose and aim corporate direction Of a plurality of elements belonging to the category of vision of the company, and a plurality of categories belonging to the category of hierarchical relationships within the organization and the cooperation between the organizations, which is also correlated with the evaluation value of self-evaluation of the degree of comprehension of the corporate philosophy. Processing to receive the self-evaluated evaluation value of the strength of each element item and the self-evaluated evaluation value of the satisfaction degree of a plurality of element items belonging to the category of engagement, which is also correlated with the understanding and empathy of the corporate philosophy. When,
The multivariate analysis of the arithmetic expression expressing the objective variable as a function of the explanatory variable is performed by using the received self-evaluation of the corporate philosophy and self-evaluation of sympathy as the objective variable, and the other self-evaluation as the explanatory variable. , A process of calculating a coefficient of each of the explanatory variables of the arithmetic expression,
A process of selecting a predetermined number of coefficients from the calculated coefficient in descending order of absolute value or positive number, and extracting the element item corresponding to an explanatory variable having the coefficient as a coefficient, as an emphasis element item,
A process for outputting the priority element item ,
The organizational development support program, wherein the element items related to all evaluation values in the received processing are element items having a correlation with understanding and sympathy of a corporate philosophy .

Images